The half-life of a radioactive substance is 140 days. An initial sample is 300 mg. a) Find the mass, to the nearest milligram, that remains after 50 days. (2marks) b) After how many days will the sample decay to 200 mg? (2marks) c) At what rate, to the nearest tenth of a milligram per day, is the mass decaying after 50 days? (2marks)

To prove that A is a subset of B, we need to show that every element in A is also an element of B. A is an arbitrary element .

Let's consider an arbitrary element n in A, where (n mod 18) = 7. Since n satisfies this condition, it means that n leaves a remainder of 7 when divided by 18.

Now, we need to show that n is also an odd number. An odd number is defined as an integer that is not divisible by 2.

Since n leaves a remainder of 7 when divided by 18, it implies that n is not divisible by 2. Hence, n is an odd number.

Therefore, we have shown that for any arbitrary element n in A, it is also an element of B. Hence, A is a subset of B.

To learn more about Integer - brainly.com/question/1768254

#SPJ11

Question 11 discusses the joint PDF of X and Y, with conditions on their ranges and an expression involving their relationship.

The paragraph mentions question 11, which involves random variables X and Y with a joint probability density function (PDF) represented by a constant c.

It further mentions the conditions for the variables, such as x ranging from 0 to 20 and y ranging from 0 to 20.

The expression "fx+ys1" suggests a mathematical relationship between X and Y, but the specific details and context are not provided.

The paragraph also refers to the need to validate and mark the question, indicating an evaluation or assessment process.

However, without further information or context, it is difficult to provide a detailed explanation of the paragraph's content.

Learn more about Question 11

brainly.com/question/16882326

#SPJ11

To solve the equation, we will add tan θ on both sides:1 - tan θ + tan θ = -17.6 + tan θ0.375 tanθ = -17.6

Then, we will divide both sides by 0.375tanθ = -17.6/0.375= -46.93

Using the inverse tangent function, we can find θθ = tan⁻¹(-46.93)θ = -88.21Explanation:We have solved the equation using the formula derived from trigonometric ratios.

After rearranging the equation and adding tanθ to both sides, we were left with 0.375 tanθ = -17.6. We then divided the equation by 0.375 and found that tanθ = -46.93.

Using the inverse tangent function, we can find θ. The resulting value is -88.21.

Summary:To solve the equation 1 - tan θ = -17.6, we added tan θ to both sides and derived the formula from trigonometric ratios. After rearranging the equation, we found the value of tanθ and then used the inverse tangent function to find the value of θ. The final value of θ was found to be -88.21.

Learn more about equation click here:

https://brainly.com/question/2972832

#SPJ11

Deviation is referred to as the distance of a single score from the mean - for example, the distance of your exam score from the average exam score for the entire class

The distance of a single score from the mean - for example, the distance of your exam score from the average exam score for the entire class - is referred to as Deviation.

:In statistics, deviation refers to the amount by which a single observation or an entire dataset varies or differs from the given data's average value, such as the mean.

This definition encompasses the concept of deviation in both descriptive and inferential statistics. Deviation is usually measured by standard deviation or variance. A deviation is a measure of how far away from the central tendency an individual data point is.

Summary: Deviation is referred to as the distance of a single score from the mean - for example, the distance of your exam score from the average exam score for the entire class. The formula for deviation is given by: Deviation = Observation value - Mean value of the given data set.

Learn more about mean click here:

https://brainly.com/question/1136789

#SPJ11

To set up the triple integral for the moment about the xy-plane of an object in the shape of E, with density given by the function 8(x, y, z) = xy + 1, we need to determine the limits of integration.

The plane x + y + z = 3 intersects the first octant at three points: (3, 0, 0), (0, 3, 0), and (0, 0, 3). These points form a triangle in the xy-plane.

To set up the triple integral, we can express the limits of integration in terms of the variables x and y. The z-coordinate will range from 0 up to the height of the plane at each point in the xy-plane.

For the region in the xy-plane, we can use the limits of integration based on the triangle formed by the points of intersection.

Let's express the limits of integration:

x: 0 to 3 - y - z

y: 0 to 3 - x - z

z: 0 to 3 - x - y

Now, we can set up the triple integral for the moment about the xy-plane:

∫∫∫ (xy + 1) dz dy dx,

with the limits of integration as mentioned above.

To learn more about integration: brainly.com/question/31744185

#SPJ11

The completed and balanced half-reaction in basic solution is, cr(oh)3(s) + 4OH− (aq) → cro2−4(aq) + 3H2O (l).

The half-reaction that is completed and balanced in basic solution for the reaction, cr(oh)3(s) → cro2−4(aq) is as follows:

Firstly, balance all of the atoms except H and OCr(OH)3 (s) → CrO42− (aq)

Now, add water to balance oxygen atoms

Cr(OH)3 (s) → CrO42− (aq) + 2H2O (l)

Then, balance the charge by adding OH− ionsCr(OH)3 (s) + 4OH− (aq) → CrO42− (aq) + 3H2O (l)

Thus, the completed and balanced half-reaction in basic solution is, cr(oh)3(s) + 4OH− (aq) → cro2−4(aq) + 3H2O (l).

Learn more about chemical reaction at:

https://brainly.com/question/29321325

#SPJ11

Given that f"(x) = -4 sin(2x), f'(0) = 0, and f(0) = 6, we need to find the value of f(π/4). By integrating, we can obtain the equation for f(x) up to a constant. Thus, f(π/4) = π/2 + 5.

To find the value of f(π/4), we can integrate the given equation f"(x) = -4 sin(2x) twice. By integrating, we can obtain the equation for f(x) up to a constant.

Integrating f"(x) = -4 sin(2x) once gives us f'(x) = -2 cos(2x) + C1, where C1 is the constant of integration.

Using the given condition f'(0) = 0, we can substitute x = 0 into the equation f'(x) = -2 cos(2x) + C1, which gives us 0 = -2 cos(0) + C1. Simplifying, we find C1 = 2.

Now, integrating f'(x) = -2 cos(2x) + C1 once again gives us f(x) = -sin(2x) + 2x + C2, where C2 is another constant of integration.

Using the condition f(0) = 6, we substitute x = 0 into the equation f(x) = -sin(2x) + 2x + C2, which gives us 6 = -sin(0) + 2(0) + C2. Simplifying, we find C2 = 6.

Therefore, the equation for f(x) is f(x) = -sin(2x) + 2x + 6.

To find the value of f(π/4), we substitute x = π/4 into the equation and evaluate:

f(π/4) = -sin(2(π/4)) + 2(π/4) + 6 = -sin(π/2) + π/2 + 6 = -1 + π/2 + 6 = π/2 + 5.

Thus, f(π/4) = π/2 + 5.

Learn more about  equation here:

https://brainly.com/question/29657983

#SPJ11

The length of the curve y = sin(3x)

from x = 0

to x = π/6 is given by

[tex]\frac{1}{3}(\sqrt {10} + 3\ln (2 + \sqrt 3 ))[/tex]

The length of the curve y = sin(3x)

from x = 0

to x = π/6 is given by:

 [tex]$\int\limits_0^{\pi/6} {\sqrt {1 + {({y^{'}})^2}} dx}$[/tex]
Given, the curve is y = sin(3x)
We have to find the length of the curve from x = 0

to x = π/6 using the formula

[tex]$\int\limits_0^{\pi/6} {\sqrt {1 + {({y^{'}})^2}} dx}$[/tex]
We know that the derivative of y with respect to x is y',

so y' = 3cos(3x)
Using the formula we get,

[tex]$\int\limits_0^{\pi/6} {\sqrt {1 + {({y^{'}})^2}} dx}[/tex]

=[tex]\int\limits_0^{\pi/6} {\sqrt {1 + 9{{\cos }^2}3x} dx} $[/tex]
Now, substitute u = 3x,

then [tex]$\frac{du}{dx} = 3$[/tex]

and [tex]$dx = \frac{1}{3}du$[/tex]
Hence, the integral becomes

[tex]$\int\limits_0^{\pi/6} {\sqrt {1 + 9{{\cos }^2}3x} dx}[/tex]

= [tex]\frac{1}{3}\int\limits_0^{\pi/2} {\sqrt {1 + 9{{\cos }^2}u} du}[/tex]

Let's substitute [tex]$t = \tan u$[/tex],

then dt =[tex]{\sec ^2}udu$ and $\sec^2 u[/tex]

=1 + \tan^2 u

=[tex]1 + {t^2}$[/tex]

Also, when $u = 0,

t =[tex]\tan 0[/tex]

= 0

and when [tex]$u = \frac{\pi}{6},[/tex]

t =[tex]\tan \frac{\pi}{6}[/tex]

= [tex]\frac{\sqrt 3 }{3}$[/tex]
Hence, the integral becomes

[tex]$\frac{1}{3}\int\limits_0^{\pi/2} {\sqrt {1 + 9{{\cos }^2}u} du}[/tex]

=[tex]\frac{1}{3}\int\limits_0^{\sqrt 3 /3} {\sqrt {1 + {{\sec }^2}{\tan ^{ - 1}}t} dt} \\[/tex]

=[tex]\frac{1}{3}\int\limits_0^{\sqrt 3 /3} {\sqrt {1 + {{(1 + {t^2})}^2}} dt} \frac{1}{3}\int\limits_0^{\sqrt 3 /3} {\sqrt {1 + {{(1 + {t^2})}^2}} dt}[/tex]

On simplifying and solving the integral, we get the length of the curve from x = 0

to x = π/6 is given by

[tex]L = \frac{1}{3}(\sqrt {10} + 3\ln (2 + \sqrt 3 ))[/tex]

Therefore, the length of the curve y = sin(3x) from x = 0 to x = π/6 is given by [tex]$\frac{1}{3}(\sqrt {10} + 3\ln (2 + \sqrt 3 ))$[/tex]

To know more about integral visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30094386

#SPJ11

It is true that ANOVA tests use F distributions. ANOVA tests use F distributions. It is a statistical technique used to evaluate the differences between two or more means.

The null hypothesis in ANOVA is that all population means are equal, and the alternative hypothesis is that at least one population mean is different.

Therefore, the alternative hypothesis for ANOVA is that all populations mean are different.

The total degrees of freedom are n – 1

= 25 – 1

= 24.

The degrees of freedom for treatment are k - 1, where k is the number of groups or treatments. In this case, there are 5 groups or treatments,

so the degrees of freedom for treatment are 5 - 1

= 4.

Therefore, there are 4 degrees of freedom for treatment.

To know more about statistical technique, refer

https://brainly.com/question/30787558

#SPJ11

The null hypothesis is rejected, and the confidence interval does not include 7,495 hours. We conclude that the mean life of the CFLs is different from 7,495 hours.

a. At the 0.05 level of significance, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the mean life of the CFLs is different from 7,495 hours.

b. The 95% confidence interval for the population mean life of the light bulbs is 7,429.8 to 7,494.2 hours.

c. The results of (a) and (c) are consistent. The confidence interval does not include 7,495 hours, which supports the conclusion that the mean life of the CFLs is different from 7,495 hours.

Learn more about null hypothesis here:

brainly.com/question/19263925

#SPJ11

The set {0,2,3} is a partition of [0,3].

So, the answer is B

A partition of a set is a collection of non-empty subsets, which are mutually exclusive and exhaustive. In other words, each element of the original set is assigned to exactly one of the subsets in the partition.

Therefore, we can conclude that a partition should satisfy the following conditions:

All subsets in the partition are non-empty

.The intersection of any two distinct subsets in the partition is empty.

The union of all the subsets in the partition is equal to the original set.Let's examine each of the given sets to see which one is a partition of [0, 3].(A) {0,1,3/2, 2,5/2}

The set (A) contains the element 0, so it satisfies the first condition. However, it does not contain the element 3, which means it is not a subset of [0, 3]. Therefore, it cannot be a partition of [0, 3].(B) {0,2,3}

The set (B) contains the elements 0, 2, and 3, so it satisfies the first condition. It also satisfies the second condition because the intersection of any two distinct subsets is empty.

Finally, the union of the three subsets is [0, 3], which satisfies the third condition. Therefore, (B) is a partition of [0, 3].(C) {1,2,3}The set (C) does not contain the element 0, so it is not a subset of [0, 3]. Therefore, it cannot be a partition of [0, 3].(D) {0,2/11, 1, 2, 7/3, 8/3}The set (D) contains the element 0, so it satisfies the first condition. However, it contains the elements 2/11 and 8/3, which are not in [0, 3]. Therefore, it is not a subset of [0, 3]. Therefore, it cannot be a partition of [0, 3].

Thus, the correct option is (B) {0,2,3}.

Learn more about partition at:

https://brainly.com/question/31844329

#SPJ11

After the debt repayments, the total debt is down to £15 million, and the exit Enterprise Value relative to EBITDA multiple assumed is [tex]7x[/tex]. The IRR of the investment is 12.16%, and the cash return is 1.41.

Dara Bank conducted a leveraged buyout of BallbackCo in 2017.

The equity contribution was £25 million, and the LBO was funded with a term loan of £24 million and senior notes of £6 million. Five years later, Dara is looking to sell the company.

The estimated EBITDA for 2022 is £10 million, and after debt repayments, the total debt is now down to £15 million.

The exit Enterprise Value relative to EBITDA multiple assumed is [tex]7x[/tex].

The IRR of the investment is 12.16%, and the cash return is 1.41. Conclusion: Dara Bank conducted an LBO of BallbackCo in 2017, and they are now looking to sell it five years later.

After the debt repayments, the total debt is down to £15 million, and the exit Enterprise Value relative to EBITDA multiple assumed is [tex]7x[/tex]. The IRR of the investment is 12.16%, and the cash return is 1.41.

To know more about Enterprise Value visit:

brainly.com/question/30767816

#SPJ11

The polynomial and power methods are numerical techniques used to determine the eigenvalues of a matrix.

The polynomial method is based on the fact that if a matrix A has an eigenvalue λ, then the determinant of the matrix (A - λI) is zero, where I is the identity matrix. This leads to a polynomial equation of degree n (where n is the size of the matrix) that can be solved to find the eigenvalues. The power method, on the other hand, utilizes the dominant eigenvalue and its corresponding eigenvector. It starts with an initial guess for the dominant eigenvector and iteratively multiplies it by matrix A, normalizing it at each step. This process converges to the dominant eigenvector, and the corresponding eigenvalue can be obtained by the Rayleigh quotient.

The strengths of the polynomial method include its ability to find all eigenvalues of a matrix and its simplicity in implementation. However, it can be computationally expensive for large matrices and is sensitive to ill-conditioned matrices. The power method is efficient for finding the dominant eigenvalue and corresponding eigenvector of a matrix. It converges quickly for matrices with a clear dominant eigenvalue. However, it may fail to converge for matrices without a dominant eigenvalue or when multiple eigenvalues have similar magnitudes.

The polynomial method is suitable for finding all eigenvalues, while the power method is effective for determining the dominant eigenvalue. Both methods have their strengths and limitations, and the choice of method depends on the specific characteristics of the matrix and the desired eigenvalue information.

Learn more about polynomials here: brainly.com/question/54172210
#SPJ11

Given that n = 470 and p (p-hat) = 0.53 and we are required to find the margin of error at a 90% confidence level.

First, we find the value of z from the standard normal distribution table that corresponds to a 90% confidence level, which is the complement of the significance level α = 1 - 0.90 = 0.10. Then, we use the formula for the margin of error that involves zα/2, p-hat and q-hat.

As per the formula:

Margin of error = zα/2 [sqrt(p-hat * q-hat)/n]

Here, p-hat = 0.53q-hat = 1 - p-hat = 1 - 0.53 = 0.47

n = 470So,

Margin of error = zα/2 [sqrt(p-hat * q-hat)/n] = z0.05 [sqrt(0.53 * 0.47)/470] = 0.048

We know that at a 90% confidence level, the value of zα/2 is 1.645

Hence, the answer is:

Margin of error = zα/2 [sqrt(p-hat * q-hat)/n] = z0.05 [sqrt(0.53 * 0.47)/470] = 0.048

The margin of error is 0.048, which means that the true population proportion is estimated to be within 0.048 of the sample proportion with 90% confidence. Now, we can construct the confidence interval as:

p-hat ± Margin of error = 0.53 ± 0.048

The lower limit is 0.53 - 0.048 = 0.482

The upper limit is 0.53 + 0.048 = 0.578

Hence, we can conclude that the true population proportion is estimated to be between 0.482 and 0.578 with 90% confidence. Therefore, the conclusion is that the confidence interval for the population proportion at a 90% confidence level is (0.482, 0.578).

To know more about margin of error visit:

brainly.com/question/29419047

#SPJ11

To find value of t for which the tangent line to curve r(t) = (12t-12, cos(3mt)-12mt, 3t²) is perpendicular to plane 3x-3πy+30z=-5, we to tangent vector to curve is proportional to the normal vector of the plane.

The tangent vector to the curve r(t) is given by the derivative of r(t) with respect to t. Taking the derivative, we find r'(t) = (12, -3m sin(3mt)-12m, 6t).

The normal vector to the plane 3x-3πy+30z=-5 is (3, -3π, 30).For the tangent line to be perpendicular to the plane, the dot product of the tangent vector and the normal vector should be zero. Calculating the dot product, we have:

(12, -3m sin(3mt)-12m, 6t) · (3, -3π, 30) = 12(3) + (-3m sin(3mt)-12m)(-3π) + 6t(30) = 36 + 9πm sin(3mt) + 36m - 180t = 0.

Now, we need to solve this equation to find the value of t. This may involve using numerical methods or further simplification depending on the given value of m.Once the equation is solved, we will obtain the value of t, which corresponds to the point on the curve where the tangent line is perpendicular to the given plane.

To learn more about tangent line click here :

brainly.com/question/23416900

#SPJ11

Answer:500kWh

Step-by-step explanation:you subtract 500kWh to 1000kWh equals to 500

A.To evaluate the

limit lim

(x² - 2x)/(x² - 2x - 8) as x approaches 4, we can simplify the expression and then substitute the value of x into the simplified expression.

b) To evaluate the limit lim(x² - 16)/(√(2x + 1) - 3) as x approaches 4, we can simplify the expression and then substitute the value of x into the simplified expression.

C)To evaluate the limit lim(2x - 8)[(3 + h)² + 6(3 + h) + 7 - (3)² - 6(3) - 7]/h as h approaches 0, we can simplify the expression and then substitute the value of h into the simplified expression.

d)To evaluate the limit lim(2x + 7) as h approaches 0, we can substitute the value of h into the expression.

e) To evaluate the limit lim(x - 39 - x²)/(6x² - 3x + 8) as x approaches 0, we can simplify the expression and then substitute the value of x into the simplified expression.

f) To evaluate the limit lim(4x² - 16)/(1/2) as x approaches infinity, we can simplify the expression and then substitute the value of x into the simplified expression.

To evaluate the limit lim(x² - 2x)/(x² - 2x - 8) as x approaches 4, we can factor the numerator and denominator. The expression becomes lim[x(x - 2)]/[(x - 4)(x + 2)]. Canceling out the common factors of (x - 2), we get lim[x/(x + 2)]. Now we can substitute x = 4 into the expression, which gives us 4/(4 + 2) = 4/6 = 2/3.

b) To evaluate the limit lim(x² - 16)/(√(2x + 1) - 3) as x approaches 4, we can factor the numerator as (x + 4)(x - 4). The denominator can be simplified using the difference of squares: √(2x + 1) - 3 = (√(2x + 1) - 3) * (√(2x + 1) + 3) / (√(2x + 1) + 3). Canceling out the common factor of (√(2x + 1) - 3), we get lim[(x + 4)/(√(2x + 1) + 3)]. Now we can substitute x = 4 into the expression, which gives us 8/7.

c) To evaluate the limit lim(2x - 8)[(3 + h)² + 6(3 + h) + 7 - (3)² - 6(3) - 7]/h as h approaches 0, we can expand and simplify the numerator. Expanding the numerator gives us (2x - 8)(9 + 6h + h² + 18 + 6h + 7 - 9 - 18 - 7). Combining like terms, we get (2x - 8)(h² + 12h). Now we can cancel out the common factor of (2x - 8) and substitute h = 0, which gives us 0.

d)To evaluate the limit lim(2x + 7) as h approaches 0, we can substitute h = 0 into the expression. The result is 2x + 7.

e)To evaluate the limit lim(x - 39 - x²)/(6x² - 3x + 8) as x approaches 0, we can simplify the expression. The numerator simplifies to -x² - x + 39, and the denominator remains the same. Now we can substitute x = 0 into the expression, which gives us 39/8.

f) To evaluate the limit lim(4x² - 16)/(1/2) as x approaches infinity, we can simplify the expression. Multiplying by 2/1, we get lim(8x² - 32) as x approaches infinity. Since the coefficient of the highest power of x is positive, the limit as x approaches infinity is

infinity

.

To learn more about

trigonometric

brainly.com/question/29156330

#SPJ11

The derivative statement is if f(x) = axⁿ, then f'(x) = naxⁿ⁻¹

The positive dimensions are 225 cm by 225 cm

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

The power function, f(x) = axⁿ

The derivative of the functions can be calculated using the first principle which states that

if f(x) = axⁿ, then f'(x) = naxⁿ⁻¹

So, the derivative statement is if f(x) = axⁿ, then f'(x) = naxⁿ⁻¹

Here, we have

Perimeter, P = 900

Represent the dimensions with x and y

So, we have

2(x + y) = 900

Divide by 2

x + y = 450

This gives

y = 450 - x

The area is then calculated as

A = xy

So, we have

A = x(450 - x)

Expand

A = 450x - x²

Differentiate and set to 0

450 - 2x = 0

So, we have

2x = 450

Divide

x = 225

Recall that

y = 450 - x

So, we have

y = 450 - 225

Evaluate

y = 225

Hence, the dimensions are 225 cm by 225 cm

Read more about area at

https://brainly.com/question/24487155

#SPJ4

The probability of obtaining a sample mean as large or larger is 0.0228.

option B.

The probability of obtaining a sample mean as large or larger is calculated as follows;

The given parameters;

The standard error (SE) of the sampling distribution is calculated as;

SE = σ / √n

SE = 0.8 / √64

SE = 0.8 / 8

SE = 0.1

The z-score of the sample mean is calculated as follows;

z = (x - μ) / SE

z = (3.4 - 3.2) / 0.1

z = 0.2 / 0.1

z = 2

Using a z-score calculator;

P (X > Z) = 0.0228

Learn more about z-score here: https://brainly.com/question/25638875

#SPJ4

The probability of obtaining a sample mean as large or larger than 3.4 pounds is 0.0228.

The correct answer is: b. 0.0228

Given data:

Population mean (μ) = 3.2 pounds

Population standard deviation (σ) = 0.8 pound

Sample size (n) = 64

Sample mean (x) = 3.4 pounds

We have to standardize the sample mean using the z-score formula and then find the corresponding area under the standard normal distribution curve.

The formula for calculating the z-score is:

z = (x - μ) / (σ / √n)

substituting the values:

z = (3.4 - 3.2) / (0.8 / √64)

z = 0.2 / (0.8 / 8)

z = 0.2 / 0.1

z = 2

Using a calculator, the area to the right of z = 2 is the probability 0.0228.

Learn more about probability at:

#SPJ4

The general solution is Option (A).

Given equation is (D²-2D+1)y=2sin x

We know that, D²-2D+1=(D-1)²

So, the equation becomes (D-1)²y = 2sinx

Since (D-1)² = D² - 2D +1 is a second-order homogeneous differential equation with constant coefficients with the characteristic equation r²-2r+1=0

The roots of the equation are r=1

The general solution of the differential equation

(D²-2D+1)y=2sin x

is given by the equation

y = (c₁ + c₂x)e^x + sin(x)

Where c₁ and c₂ are constants.

Hence the correct option is (A) y=c₁ex+c₂xex + sinx+cosx.

#SPJ11

Let us know more about general solution : https://brainly.com/question/32062078.

First derivative of the function g′(x)=x³/√x for x > 0

The value of g(5) is  250/3√5 - 23/3.

Let's find the solution to the given question.

We have, First derivative of the function g′(x)=x³/√x for x > 0

Integrating the first derivative to get the function, we have

∫g′(x) dx=∫x³/√x dx=∫x²√x dx

=x²(2/3)x³/2/3 + C

=2/3[tex]x^{5/2}[/tex] + C where

C is a constant of integration,

which we get from the boundary condition g(2) = -7.

So, g(2) = -7

=>2²(2/3) + C = -7

=> C = -23/3

Therefore, g(x) = 2/3[tex]x^{5/2}[/tex] - 23/3

Therefore, g(5) = [tex]2/3(5)^{(5/2)}[/tex]- 23/3

=[tex]2/3(5\times5\times5^{(1/2)})[/tex] - 23/3

=2 × 125/3×√5 - 23/3

= 250/3√5 - 23/3

Therefore, the value of g(5) is  250/3√5 - 23/3.

To know more about constant of integration, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29166386

#SPJ11

Answer:

This geometric series is convergent:

[tex] \frac{10}{1 - ( - \frac{1}{5}) } = \frac{10}{ \frac{6}{5} } = 10( \frac{5}{6} ) = \frac{25}{3} = 8 \frac{1}{3} [/tex]

The geometric series 10 - 2 + 0.4 - 0.08 + ... is convergent.

To determine if the geometric series 10 - 2 + 0.4 - 0.08 + ... is convergent or divergent, we need to examine the common ratio (r) between consecutive terms.

The common ratio (r) can be found by dividing any term by its preceding term.

Let's calculate it:

r = (-2) ÷ 10 = -0.2

r = 0.4 ÷ (-2) = -0.2

r = (-0.08) ÷ 0.4 = -0.2

In this series, the common ratio (r) is -0.2.

For a geometric series to be convergent, the absolute value of the common ratio (|r|) must be less than 1. If |r| ≥ 1, the series is divergent.

In this case, |r| = |-0.2| = 0.2 < 1.

Since the absolute value of the common ratio is less than 1, the geometric series 10 - 2 + 0.4 - 0.08 + ... is convergent.

To know more about Geometric Series:

https://brainly.com/question/11873791

The points corresponding to the parameter values are: (-2, -7), (-1, -4), (0, -1), (1, 2), (2, 5).To find the points (x, y) corresponding to the parameter values t = -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, we substitute these values of 't' into the given parametric equations:

For t = -2: x = [tex]5(-2)^2[/tex] + 5(-2) = 20 - 10 = 10

y = 3(-2) - 1 = -6 - 1 = -7

So the point is (10, -7).

For t = -1: x = [tex]5(-1)^2[/tex] + 5(-1) = 5 - 5 = 0,y = 3(-1) - 1 = -3 - 1 = -4

So the point is (0, -4).

For t = 0: x =[tex]5(0)^2[/tex]+ 5(0) = 0 + 0 = 0, y = 3(0) - 1 = 0 - 1 = -1

So the point is (0, -1).

For t = 1: x = [tex]5(1)^2[/tex] + 5(1) = 5 + 5 = 10, y = 3(1) - 1 = 3 - 1 = 2

So the point is (10, 2).

For t = 2: x = [tex]5(2)^2[/tex]+ 5(2) = 20 + 10 = 30,y = 3(2) - 1 = 6 - 1 = 5

So the point is (30, 5).

Therefore, the points corresponding to the parameter values are:

(-2, -7), (-1, -4), (0, -1), (1, 2), (2, 5).

To know more about Parametric equations visit-

brainly.com/question/30748687

#SPJ11

The deposit will triple in 20.11 yrs & the deposit will increase by 85% in 11.63 yrs.

(a) Compound Interest is calculated on the initial principal amount & the interests accumulated henceforth. In order to find the time it'll take for a deposit to triple when compounded at an interest of 5.25% annually, we can use the formula

t = ln(3) / r

Here, t = time taken for the deposit to triple

         r = interest rate.

t = ln(3) / 0.0525 = 20.11 years

(b) In order to find the time it'll take for a deposit to increase by 85% when compounded at an interest of 5.25% annually, we can use the formula

t = ln(1.85) / r

Here, t = time taken for the deposit to triple

         r = interest rate.

t = ln(1.85) / 0.0525 = 11.63 years

Therefore, The deposit will triple in 20.11 yrs & the deposit will increase by 85% in 11.63 yrs.

To learn more about Compound Interest:

https://brainly.com/question/28020457

(a) we can approximate the value of t, which is 13.19 years.

(b) we can approximate the value of t, which is 8.25 years.

a) To determine how soon a deposit will triple with a continuous compounding interest rate of 5.25%, we can use the formula for continuous compound interest:

A = P * e^(rt)

Where A is the final amount, P is the initial principal, e is the base of the natural logarithm, r is the interest rate, and t is the time in years. In this case, we want to find the time it takes for the deposit to triple, so we have:

3P = P * e^(0.0525t)

Dividing both sides by P, we get:

3 = e^(0.0525t)

Taking the natural logarithm of both sides, we have:

ln(3) = 0.0525t

Solving for t, we find:

t = ln(3) / 0.0525

Using a calculator, we can approximate the value of t, which is approximately 13.19 years.

b) To determine how soon a deposit will increase by 85% with continuous compounding at a rate of 5.25%, we can use a similar approach. We have:

1.85P = P * e^(0.0525t)

Dividing both sides by P, we get:

1.85 = e^(0.0525t)

Taking the natural logarithm of both sides, we have:

ln(1.85) = 0.0525t

Solving for t, we find:

t = ln(1.85) / 0.0525

Using a calculator, we can approximate the value of t, which is approximately 8.25 years.



To learn more about logarithm click here: brainly.com/question/30226560

#SPJ11

The true statements about the normal distribution are A. Approximately 95% of scores/values will fall between +/- 2 standard deviations from the mean and C. The majority of scores/values will fall within +/- 1 standard deviation of the mean.

In a normal distribution, approximately 95% of the scores/values will fall within two standard deviations (plus or minus) from the mean. This means that the distribution is symmetric, and the majority of values are concentrated around the mean. Therefore, statement A is true.

Regarding statement C, in a normal distribution, the majority of scores/values (around 68%) will fall within one standard deviation (plus or minus) from the mean. This shows that the distribution is relatively tightly clustered around the mean. Hence, statement C is also true.

Statement B is not true for the normal distribution. In a normal distribution, the tails on both sides of the distribution have equal lengths, making it a symmetric bell-shaped curve. Therefore, the right tail is not longer than the left tail.

Statement D is also not true. While the vast majority of scores/values fall within three standard deviations from the mean, it is not accurate to say that 100% of the values will fall within this range. The normal distribution extends infinitely in both directions, so there is a small possibility of extreme values lying beyond three standard deviations from the mean.

Learn more about mean here: https://brainly.com/question/24182582

#SPJ11

If-else statements are used to generate results based on the inputs of the player and the dealer. These statements help generate the best possible outcome for the player by analyzing the dealer's card and the player's card.

Blackjack is a card game played at casinos with the goal of obtaining cards that total up to 21 or as close as possible without going over. The objective is to beat the dealer, who is the representative of the house. To help players make decisions on whether to hit or stand, a simple strategy has been implemented in this program. The strategy follows specific rules: if your cards = 17 or higher, always stand regardless of what the dealer is showing in their face-up card; if your cards total 11 or lower, always hit. If your cards add up to 13 to 16 (inclusive), hit if the dealer is showing 7 or higher, otherwise stand. If your cards add up to 12 or = 12, hit unless the dealer is showing 4 to 6 (inclusive). In that case, stand. The program makes use of if-else statements to generate results based on the player's card and the dealer's card. With these statements, the program generates the best possible outcome for the player by analyzing the dealer's card and the player's card.

In conclusion, this program simulates a game of Blackjack with a simple strategy to help the player decide whether to hit or stand based on their cards and the dealer's card. The if-else statements in the program are used to generate results based on the player's and the dealer's cards. The implementation of the simple strategy may cause the player to lose money slowly at the casino, but following no strategy may lead to the player losing money quickly.

Learn more about If-else statements here:

brainly.com/question/32241479

#SPJ11

The distribution of X is normally distributed.

The given information states that the THC content of marijuana sold on the street is normally distributed with a mean of 9.8% and a standard deviation of 2%. This means that the THC content follows a bell-shaped curve, where the majority of values will be around the mean of 9.8%.

In statistical terms, we can represent the THC content as a random variable X. Since X is normally distributed, we can use the notation X ~ N(9.8, 0.02^2), where N represents the normal distribution, 9.8 is the mean, and 0.02 is the standard deviation.

To find the probability that a randomly selected bag of marijuana sold on the street will have a THC content greater than 9.1, we need to calculate the area under the curve to the right of 9.1. This can be done by finding the z-score corresponding to 9.1, which measures the number of standard deviations a value is away from the mean. Using the formula z = (X - μ) / σ, we can calculate the z-score as (9.1 - 9.8) / 0.02 = -3.5.

Now, we can use a standard normal distribution table or a calculator to find the probability associated with a z-score of -3.5. The probability corresponds to the area under the curve to the right of the z-score. In this case, the probability is approximately 0.0002327, rounded to 4 decimal places. Therefore, the probability that a randomly selected bag of marijuana sold on the street will have a THC content greater than 9.1 is approximately 0.0002.

Learn more about normal distribution

brainly.com/question/15103234

#SPJ11

To select the cost of the best alternative, we need to calculate the Present Worth (PW) of each alternative and choose the one with the lowest PW. The Minimum Acceptable Rate of Return (MARR) is given as 10% per year.

Let's calculate the PW for each alternative:

Alternative A:

Initial Cost: -$25,000

Annual Cost: -$9,000

Annual Revenue: $3,200

Deposit Return: $5,000

n: 4 years

The PW of Alternative A can be calculated as follows:

[tex]PW(A) = \text{Initial Cost} + \text{Annual Cost}(P/A, 10\%, 4) + \text{Annual Revenue}(P/G, 10\%, 4) + \text{Deposit Return}(P/F, 10\%, 4)\\\\= -25000 + (-9000)(P/A, 10\%, 4) + (3200)(P/G, 10\%, 4) + (5000)(P/F, 10\%, 4)[/tex]

Using the interest rate table, we can find the factors:

[tex]P/A, 10\%, 4 = 3.16986 \\P/G, 10\%, 4 = 3.16986 \\P/F, 10\%, 4 = 0.68301 \\[/tex]

Substituting these values into the equation:

[tex]PW(A) = -25000 + (-9000)(3.16986) + (3200)(3.16986) + (5000)(0.68301) \\= -25000 - 28529.74 + 10156.99 + 3415.05 \\= -\$39957.70[/tex]

Alternative B:

Initial Cost: -$32,000

Annual Cost: -$7,000

Annual Revenue: $1,900

Deposit Return: $9,000

n: 4 years

Using the same approach, we can calculate the PW of Alternative B:

[tex]PW(B) = -32000 + (-7000)(P/A, 10\%, 4) + (1900)(P/G, 10\%, 4) + (9000)(P/F, 10\%, 4)[/tex]

Using the interest rate table:

[tex]P/A, 10\%, 4 = 3.16986 \\P/G, 10\%, 4 = 3.16986 \\P/F, 10\%, 4 = 0.68301 \\[/tex]

Substituting the values:

[tex]PW(B) = -32000 + (-7000)(3.16986) + (1900)(3.16986) + (9000)(0.68301) \\= -32000 - 22189.02 + 6010.74 + 6147.09 \\= -\$42031.19[/tex]

Comparing the PWs of the two alternatives, we see that PW(A) is -$39957.70 and PW(B) is -$42031.19. Since PW(A) has a lower value, the cost of the best alternative is -$39957.70.

Therefore, the correct answer is:

c. 39986

To know more about Value visit-

brainly.com/question/30760879

#SPJ11

The New median price = $570 and

New IQR = $370

To find the new values of each summary statistic after increasing the price of every television by $20:

New lowest price = $250 + $20 = $270

New mean price = $700 + $20 = $720

New median price remains the same at $570 (since the increase is constant for all prices)

New range = $1250 (since the increase is constant for all prices)

New IQR = $350 (since the increase is constant for all prices)

New Q₁ = $395 + $20 = $415

New standard deviation remains the same at $200 (since the increase is constant for all prices)

Therefore, the new values are:

New median price = $570

New IQR = $370

To know more about statistic, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30599436

#SPJ11

Step-by-step explanation:

There are 52 cards     13 are diamonds   26 are black

   13 out of 52   times    26 out of 52 =

     13/52 X 26/52 = 1/8 = .125