(a) T-account for Labor Cost:
Debit | Credit
-------|--------
935 hrs * $70 = $65,450 | Cash/Bank $65,450
T-account for Applied Service Overhead:
Debit | Credit
-------|--------
935 hrs * $57 = $53,295 | Service Overhead Payable $53,295
(b) Income Statement for TechMaster for August:
Revenue:
935 hrs * $220 = $205,700
Cost of Services Billed:
935 hrs * $70 = $65,450
+ Applied Service Overhead: $53,295
Total Cost of Services Billed: $118,745
Gross Profit: $86,955
Operating Expenses:
Overhead Costs: $47,000
Marketing and Administrative Costs: $67,000
Total Operating Expenses: $114,000
Net Loss: ($27,045)
Note: Since the total operating expenses are higher than the gross profit, the company incurred a net loss for the month of August.
Learn more about Labor Cost here:
https://brainly.com/question/30011394
#SPJ11
Alanco, Inc. manufactures a variety of products and is currently manufacturing all of their own component parts. An outside supplier has offered to sell one of those components to Alanco. To evaluate this offer, the following information has been gathered relating to the cost of producing the component internally: Direct Materials$4Direct Labor$6Variable Manufacturing Overhead$2Fix Manufacturing Overhead, Traceable*$5Fix Manufacturing Overhead, Common but Allocated$8Total Cost$25.00Supplier Price= $21Units Per Year= 12,000
Fix manufacturing overhead, traceable is composed of two items:
Depreciation of Equipment:30%Supervisor Salary:70%
Assuming the company has no alternative use for the facilities now being used to produce the component, complete the following analysis to determine if the outside supplier's offer should be accepted.
Based on this analysis, write an if statement to determine if Alanco should make or buy the component.
Alanco should ............. the component.
To determine if Alanco should make or buy the component, we need to compare the cost of producing the component internally with the cost of purchasing it from the outside supplier.
The relevant costs of making the component are:
Direct materials: $4
Direct labor: $6
Variable manufacturing overhead: $2
Traceable fixed manufacturing overhead (30% x $5): $1.50
Total relevant cost per unit: $13.50
If Alanco buys the component from the supplier, the cost will be $21 per unit.
Since the relevant cost of making the component internally is less than the cost of buying it from the supplier, Alanco should make the component.
Therefore, the if statement should be:
if (13.50 < 21) {
Alanco should make the component.
} else {
Alanco should buy the component.
}
The cost of producing the component internally is $25 per unit, while the outside supplier is offering it for $21 per unit. This means that Alanco can save $4 per unit by purchasing from the outside supplier.
Therefore, the if statement to determine if Alanco should make or buy the component would be:
If the cost of producing the component internally is greater than the cost of purchasing it from the outside supplier, Alanco should buy the component.
In this case, since the cost of purchasing the component from the outside supplier is lower than the cost of producing it internally, Alanco should buy the component.
Learn more about relevant here:
https://brainly.com/question/13036889
#SPJ11
johanna wants to set aside funds to take an around the world cruise in four years. jane expects that she will need $20,000 for her dream vacation. if she can earn 8% per annum on an investment, how much will she have to set aside today so that she will have sufficient funds available?
Johanna needs to set aside $14,238 today to have sufficient funds available to take an around the world cruise in four years, assuming an 8% return on her investment.To calculate the amount Johanna needs to set aside today for her dream vacation, she needs to use the present value formula.
Using an 8% annual interest rate and a four-year timeframe, the calculation would be: Present Value = Future Value / (1 + r) ^ n, where r is the annual interest rate, and n is the number of years. Plugging in the values, we get: Present Value = $20,000 / (1 + 0.08) ^ 4, which comes out to be approximately $14,238.
Therefore, Johanna needs to set aside $14,238 today to have sufficient funds available to take an around the world cruise in four years, assuming an 8% return on her investment.
To know more about value, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/30145972#
#SPJ11
stare decisis is a doctrine obligating judges to help persons who failed to protect their own rights. a. true b. false
The statement "tare decisis is a doctrine obligating judges to help persons who failed to protect their own rights" is false.
Stare decisis is a legal doctrine that emphasizes the importance of precedent in judicial decision-making. This doctrine obligates judges to follow the rulings of previously decided cases, particularly those from higher courts, when facing similar legal issues. The primary purpose of stare decisis is to promote stability, predictability, and consistency in the legal system.
Stare decisis does not directly obligate judges to help persons who failed to protect their own rights. Rather, it guides judges in making decisions based on established principles and ensures that similar cases are treated consistently over time. This can indirectly benefit individuals by creating a more predictable legal environment, making it easier for them to understand and protect their rights.
In summary, stare decisis is a fundamental principle in the legal system that requires judges to adhere to precedent. It does not directly involve helping individuals who have failed to protect their own rights, but rather seeks to create a stable and consistent legal framework for all individuals to navigate.
To learn more about doctrine refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30613074
#SPJ11
Assume that the Fed intervenes by exchanging dollars for euros in the foreign exchange market. This will cause an ____ U.S. dollars and an ____ euros.
This intervention can be used by the Fed to influence exchange rates and achieve economic objectives, such as stabilizing currency values or supporting international trade.
Assuming that the Fed intervenes by exchanging dollars for euros in the foreign exchange market, this will cause an increase in the supply of U.S. dollars and a decrease in the supply of euros.
When the Fed buys euros with U.S. dollars, it increases the demand for euros while simultaneously increasing the supply of U.S. dollars in the foreign exchange market. This increase in supply of U.S. dollars will lead to a decrease in its value relative to the euro, causing the exchange rate to decline.
On the other hand, since the Fed is buying euros, the demand for euros increases, which leads to an increase in the value of the euro relative to the U.S. dollar. This means that it will take more U.S. dollars to buy the same amount of euros as before the intervention. Overall, this intervention by the Fed will result in a depreciation of the U.S. dollar and an appreciation of the euro.
to know about currency visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14372075
#SPJ11
A machine costing $215,400 with a four-year life and an estimated $19,000 salvage value is installed in Luther Company’s factory on January 1. The factory manager estimates the machine will produce 491,000 units of product during its life. It actually produces the following units: year 1, 122,700; year 2, 123,400; year 3, 119,600; and year 4, 135,300. The total number of units produced by the end of year 4 exceeds the original estimate—this difference was not predicted. (The machine must not be depreciated below its estimated salvage value.)
Based on the given information, the machine's cost is $215,400 with a four-year life and an estimated $19,000 salvage value. The factory manager estimated the machine would produce 491,000 units of product during its life. However, it actually produces a total of 501,000 units over the four years, which is 10,000 more than the original estimate.
To calculate the depreciation of the machine, we need to first determine the annual depreciation expense using the straight-line depreciation method. Straight-line depreciation is calculated by subtracting the salvage value from the cost of the asset and dividing that amount by the useful life of the asset. In this case, the annual depreciation expense is:
($215,400 - $19,000) / 4 years = $49,850 per year
Using this annual depreciation expense, we can calculate the accumulated depreciation for each year:
Year 1: $49,850
Year 2: $99,700
Year 3: $149,550
Year 4: $199,400
Now we can calculate the book value of the machine at the end of each year by subtracting the accumulated depreciation from the cost of the asset:
Year 1: $165,550
Year 2: $115,700
Year 3: $65,850
Year 4: $16,000 (not below the estimated salvage value)
Since the machine produced more units than originally estimated, it does not affect the depreciation calculation. The machine must not be depreciated below its estimated salvage value of $19,000. Therefore, at the end of year 4, the book value of the machine is $19,000, which is also the salvage value.
To know more about depreciation, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30531944
#SPJ11
Exercise 9-14 (Algorithmic) (LO.3) In November 2021, Kortney (who is a self-employed management consultant) travels from Chicago to Barcelona (Spain) on business. She is gone 10 days (including 2 days of travel) during which time she spends 5 days conducting business and 3 days sightseeing. Her expenses are$2,590(airfare),$290per day (meals at local restaurants), and$525per night (lodging). Because Kortney stayed with relatives while sightseeing, she only paid for 5 nights of lodging. Compute Kortney's deductions for the following: If required, round your answers to the nearest dollar. a. Deduction for airfare: Feentse T Check My Werk An itemized deduction is allowed for unreimbursed travel expenses related to a taxpayer's employment. Travel expenses are more broadly defined in the Code than are transportation expenses. b. Deduction for meals:xFexalusk T Creck My Wark Incortect c. Deduction for lodging:
the deduction for lodging is $1,575. In November 2021, Kortney (who is a self-employed management consultant) travels from Chicago to Barcelona (Spain) on business. She is gone 10 days (including 2 days of travel) during which time she spends 5 days conducting business and 3 days sightseeing.
a. Deduction for airfare:
Kortney's airfare expense is fully deductible as it is a necessary and ordinary expense directly related to her business travel. Therefore, the deduction for airfare is $2,590.
b. Deduction for meals:
Kortney's meal expense is partially deductible. According to the IRS, taxpayers can deduct 50% of the cost of meals incurred while traveling for business purposes. Since Kortney spent 5 days conducting business during her 10-day trip, the deductible amount for meals is calculated as:
5 business days x $290 per day x 50% = $725
Therefore, the deduction for meals is $725.
c. Deduction for lodging:
Kortney's lodging expense is also partially deductible. However, the amount of the deduction depends on whether she stayed in a hotel or with relatives. Since Kortney stayed with relatives for 5 out of the 8 nights she was away, she can only deduct the lodging expenses incurred for the 3 nights she stayed in a hotel. The deductible amount is calculated as:
3 hotel nights x $525 per night = $1,575
Learn more about business here:.
https://brainly.com/question/15826604
#SPJ11
Selected information about income statement accounts for the Reed Company is presented below (the company's fiscal year ends on December 31):
2018 2017
Sales $ 4,450,000 $ 3,550,000
Cost of goods sold 2,870,000 2,010,000
Administrative expenses 810,000 685,000
Selling expenses 370,000 322,000
Interest revenue 151,000 141,000
Interest expense 202,000 202,000
Loss on sale of assets of discontinued component 54,000 —
On July 1, 2018, the company adopted a plan to discontinue a division that qualifies as a component of an entity as defined by GAAP. The assets of the component were sold on September 30, 2018, for $54,000 less than their book value. Results of operations for the component (included in the above account balances) were as follows:
1/1/18-9/30/18 2017 Sales $ 410,000 $ 510,000 Cost of goods sold (295,000) (326,000)
Administrative expenses (51,000) (41,000)
Selling expenses (21,000) (31,000)
Operating income before taxes $ 43,000 $ 112,000 In addition to the account balances above, several events occurred during 2018 that have not yet been reflected in the above accounts:
A fire caused $51,000 in uninsured damages to the main office building. The fire was considered to be an infrequent but not unusual event.
Inventory that had cost $41,000 had become obsolete because a competitor introduced a better product. The inventory was sold as scrap for $5,000.
Income taxes have not yet been recorded.
Required:
Prepare a multiple-step income statement for the Reed Company for 2018, showing 2017 information in comparative format, including income taxes computed at 40% and EPS disclosures assuming 400,000 shares of common stock. (Amounts to be deducted should be indicated with a minus sign. Round EPS answers to 2 decimal places.)
An income statement, also known as a profit and loss statement, is a financial statement that reports a company's revenues, expenses, gains, and losses over a specific period of time, usually a quarter or a fiscal year.
For the Year Ended December 31, 2018
2018 2017
Sales 4,450,000 3,550,000
Cost of goods sold 2,870,000 2,010,000
Gross profit 1,580,000 1,540,000
Operating expenses:
Administrative expenses 810,000 685,000
Selling expenses 370,000 322,000
Total operating expenses 1,180,000 1,007,000
Operating income 400,000 533,000
Other income (expense):
Interest revenue 151,000 141,000
Interest expense (202,000) (202,000)
Loss on sale of assets (54,000) —
Income before taxes 295,000 472,000
Income tax expense (118,000) (188,800)
Net income 177,000 283,200
EPS = Net income / Shares outstanding
Shares outstanding = 400,000
EPS for 2018 = 177,000 / 400,000 = $0.44
EPS for 2017 = 283,200 / 400,000 = $0.71
The fire damage and inventory write-off are not separately disclosed in the income statement as they are not considered material events.
To learn more about “EPS” refer to the https://brainly.com/question/28506840
#SPJ11
True or False: Price Objection occurs when a Professional Sales Representative either stalls or declines to sell a product/service due to the products varying cost
False. Price objection occurs when a potential customer objects to the price of a product or service and believes it is too high or not worth the cost.
It is not related to the sales representative's willingness to sell the product/service due to its varying cost.
False. Price objection occurs when a customer or prospect raises concerns about the cost of a product/service, not when a Professional Sales Representative stalls or declines to sell it. The sales representative's role is to address these objections and provide solutions to overcome them.
Price objection is a common objection raised by customers when they perceive the price of a product or service to be too high relative to its perceived value or compared to other available options. It is a challenge faced by businesses when trying to sell their products or services.
Price objections can arise for various reasons, such as the customer's perception of the product's value, their budget constraints, their prior experiences with similar products or services, or the availability of cheaper alternatives. Overcoming price objections requires businesses to demonstrate the value and benefits of their products or services and to address any misconceptions or concerns that customers may have about the price.
Visit here to learn more about sales representative brainly.com/question/29395497
#SPJ11
We are about to make an investment that is going to generate $ 3560000 in the next 19 years annually at the end of each years. Similar investments offer 14 8% annual percentage rate. Assuming that we deposit this money at the end of each years on our savings account than how much money are we going to have at the end of year 19? (Give the answer in dollars without the $ sign Eg, if the answeis 142.15 than write 142)
You will have approximately 188,527,000 dollars in your savings account. To calculate the total amount of money we will have at the end of year 19.
We can use the formula for calculating the future value of an annuity:
FV = PMT x [(1 + r)^n - 1] / r
Where FV is the future value, PMT is the annual payment, r is the annual interest rate, and n is the number of years.
In this case, PMT = $3560000, r = 14.8%, and n = 19.
First, we need to calculate the deposit amount:
Deposit = PMT / (1 + r) = $3560000 / (1 + 0.148) = $3090865.69
So we will need to deposit $3090865.69 at the end of each year for 19 years.
Using the formula, we can calculate the future value:
FV = $3090865.69 x [(1 + 0.148)^19 - 1] / 0.148 = $132447982.58
Therefore, we will have $132447982.58 at the end of year 19.
Learn more about money here:
https://brainly.com/question/22984856
#SPJ11
discuss the different types of parameters that are used in cost functions. where is this information kept?
In cost functions, there are various types of parameters used to represent different aspects of the function. The most common types of parameters include fixed costs, variable costs, and marginal costs. Fixed costs are costs that remain constant regardless of the level of output, such as rent or salaries.
Variable costs, on the other hand, change based on the level of output, such as materials or labor. Marginal costs refer to the cost of producing one additional unit of output.
Other parameters that may be used in cost functions include average costs, total costs, revenue, and profit. Average costs refer to the total cost divided by the level of output, while total costs are the sum of all costs.Revenue is the income earned from selling a product or service, and profit is the difference between revenue and total costs.
This information is typically kept in cost accounting systems, which are designed to track and analyze the various costs associated with producing goods or services.Cost accounting systems may be maintained manually or using software programs that integrate with other financial systems.
These systems provide critical information for decision-making related to pricing, production levels, and overall profitability.
To know more about refer cost functions here
brainly.com/question/24020943#
#SPJ11
GDP rises from $8 trillion in 1986, the base year, to $10
trillion in 1989. The GDP deflator in 1989 is 120.
Find real GDP in 1989.
Instructions: Round your answer to three decimal places.
Real GDP in 1989: trillion.
Find the percentage increase in real GDP between 1986 and
1989.
Instructions: Enter your answer as a percentage rounded to one
decimal place.
Percentage increase in real GDP between 1986 and 1989: %
Percentage increase in real GDP between 1986 and 1989: 4.2% . To find the real GDP in 1989.
We need to use the GDP deflator formula:
Real GDP = Nominal GDP / GDP deflator x 100
Substituting the given values, we get:
Real GDP in 1989 = $10 trillion / 120 x 100 = $8.333 trillion
Rounding to three decimal places, we get:
Real GDP in 1989: $8.333 trillion
To find the percentage increase in real GDP between 1986 and 1989, we can use the formula:
Percentage increase = (New value - Old value) / Old value x 100
Substituting the given values, we get:
Percentage increase in real GDP = ($8.333 trillion - $8 trillion) / $8 trillion x 100
Simplifying, we get:
Percentage increase in real GDP between 1986 and 1989: 4.162%
Rounding to one decimal place, we get:
Percentage increase in real GDP between 1986 and 1989: 4.2%
Learn more about Percentage here:
https://brainly.com/question/29306119
#SPJ11
DigCo is considering the purchase of a backhoe for the pipeline contracting firm. The machine will cost $110,000, last six years with a salvage value of $20,000, and reduce annual maintenance, insurance, and labour costs by $30,000 per year. The after tax MARR is 9% and DigCo's corporate tax rate is 55% (a) What is the exact after tax IRR for this investment? (5 marks) (b) Should DigCo buy the backhoe? (2 marks)
The after-tax IRR for the investment in the backhoe can be calculated by using the formula:
ATIRR = [(PV of cash inflows - PV of cash outflows) / PV of cash outflows] x (1 - corporate tax rate)
Here, the PV of cash inflows will be the total cash savings over the six-year period, which is calculated as follows:
Total cash savings = Annual cash savings x number of years
= $30,000 x 6
= $180,000
The PV of cash savings can be calculated using the present value formula as:
[tex]PV = FV / (1 + r) ^ n[/tex]
Where FV is the future value of cash savings, r is the discount rate, and n is the number of years.
Assuming a discount rate of 9%, the PV of cash savings will be:
[tex]PV = $180,000 / (1 + 0.09) ^ 1 + $180,000 / (1 + 0.09) ^ 2 + $180,000 / (1 + 0.09) ^ 3 + $180,000 / (1 + 0.09) ^ 4 + $180,000 / (1 + 0.09) ^ 5 + $180,000 / (1 + 0.09) ^ 6[/tex]
= $870,223.52
The PV of cash outflows will be the initial cost of the backhoe minus the salvage value, which is calculated as:
PV of cash outflows = ($110,000 - $20,000) / (1 + 0.09) ^ 1
= $87,155.96
Using the above values in the ATIRR formula, we get:
ATIRR = [($870,223.52 - $87,155.96) / $87,155.96] x (1 - 0.55)
= 0.1255 or 12.55%
Therefore, the exact after-tax IRR for this investment is 12.55%.
As for whether DigCo should buy the backhoe, we can compare the ATIRR with the MARR of 9%. Since the ATIRR is greater than the MARR,
the investment is expected to generate a positive return for DigCo. Therefore, it would be recommended for DigCo to buy the backhoe.
To know more about after-tax IRR refer here
https://brainly.com/question/17166677#
#SPJ11
The emerging international markets that receive the most attention from global retailers are collectively referred to as the ________ nations.A) Asian TigersB) Next ElevenC) MIKTD) CIVETSE) BRIC
The emerging international markets that receive the most attention from global retailers are collectively referred to as the Next Eleven (B). These nations are a group of countries identified by Goldman Sachs economist Jim O'Neill as having the potential to become some of the world's largest economies in the 21st century, alongside the BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India, China) nations. Option B.
The Next Eleven nations include Bangladesh, Egypt, Indonesia, Iran, Mexico, Nigeria, Pakistan, the Philippines, South Korea, Turkey, and Vietnam. These countries are characterized by a large and growing middle class, favorable demographics, and significant economic potential.
Global retailers are particularly interested in the Next Eleven nations because of their large populations, increasing disposable incomes, and expanding consumer markets. These markets offer significant growth opportunities for retailers looking to expand their operations and tap into new sources of revenue.
However, operating in these emerging markets can also present significant challenges, including navigating complex regulatory environments, cultural differences, and supply chain issues. Retailers must be prepared to invest in local infrastructure and adapt their business models to succeed in these dynamic markets.
In summary, the Next Eleven nations are a group of emerging markets that offer significant growth opportunities for global retailers. While operating in these markets can be challenging, the potential rewards make them an attractive target for retailers looking to expand their global footprint. Option B.
For more such questions on economies
https://brainly.com/question/28210218
#SPJ11
a company has 20,000 shares of $10 par stock outstanding and declares a stock dividend of 8%. the number of shares outstanding will increase by
The number of shares outstanding will increase by 1,600.
A stock dividend is a distribution of additional shares of stock to existing shareholders. In this case, the company has 20,000 shares of $10 par stock outstanding and declares a stock dividend of 8%.
To determine the number of additional shares issued, we first calculate the total value of the dividend.
The value of the dividend is 8% of the total value of the outstanding shares, which is:
0.08 x ($10 x 20,000) = $16,000
This means that the company will issue $16,000 worth of new shares as the stock dividend. Since each share has a par value of $10, the number of new shares issued will be:
$16,000 / $10 = 1,600
Therefore, the number of shares outstanding will increase by 1,600 as a result of the stock dividend. After the dividend, the company will have a total of 21,600 shares outstanding (20,000 + 1,600).
To know more about shares outstanding, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/14300612#
#SPJ11
kent received the following interest income: on veterans administration insurance dividends left on deposit with the va $20 on us treasury certificates 30 on state income tax refund 40 what amount should kent include for interest income in his tax return?
Assuming that the state income tax refund is not taxable in Kent's case, he should include: only the $30 from US Treasury Certificates as interest income in his tax return.
To determine the amount Kent should include for interest income in his tax return, let's consider the three sources of interest income he received:
1. Veterans Administration Insurance Dividends: $20
2. US Treasury Certificates: $30
3. State Income Tax Refund: $40
First, we need to identify which of these sources are taxable and should be included in Kent's tax return.
1. Veterans Administration Insurance Dividends: According to the IRS, the interest on insurance dividends left on deposit with the VA is not taxable. Therefore, Kent does not need to include this $20 in his tax return.
2. US Treasury Certificates: Interest on US Treasury Certificates is taxable on federal tax returns. So, Kent should include the $30 from this source in his tax return.
3. State Income Tax Refund: The state income tax refund is not considered as interest income, and its taxability depends on whether Kent had itemized deductions in the previous year. If Kent itemized his deductions and claimed a deduction for state income tax, the $40 refund may be taxable. Otherwise, it is not taxable.
Assuming that the state income tax refund is not taxable in Kent's case, he should include only the $30 from US Treasury Certificates as interest income in his tax return.
To know more about tax refund, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/19577427#
#SPJ11
In the US, the nominal GDP per capita is $60 000. In Turkey, it is 510 000. From this, can we conclude that an average Americans times better than an average Turk? (.e., does he consume 6 times more goods and services, if not do you think an areas less than or more than 6 times better off than a Turk? And why do you think so? Provide at least two justifications for your answer Note: To get credits, you need to EXPLAIN your answer. Without explanation, you will get no credits
Simply looking at the nominal GDP per capita figures, we cannot conclude that an average American is six times better off than an average Turk.
Nominal GDP per capita is a measure of the total economic output of a country divided by its population, and it does not account for differences in the cost of living, income inequality, or distribution of wealth within a country.
One justification for this is the purchasing power parity (PPP) of each country. PPP adjusts for differences in the cost of living between countries and provides a more accurate comparison of the standard of living. According to the World Bank, the PPP-adjusted GDP per capita in the US is $65,112, while in Turkey it is $29,143.
This means that the average American's purchasing power is only 2.2 times higher than the average Turk's, not six times.
Another justification is income inequality. GDP per capita is an average measure, meaning that it does not account for the distribution of income within a country.
In the US, there is a significant wealth gap, with the top 10% owning 70% of the wealth. In Turkey, the wealth gap is also significant, with the top 20% owning 52% of the wealth.
This means that while the average American may have a higher GDP per capita than the average Turk, there are likely many Americans who are not better off than the average Turk.
In conclusion, while the nominal GDP per capita figures may suggest that an average American is six times better off than an average Turk, this is not a valid conclusion.
When accounting for differences in the cost of living and income inequality, the difference in standard of living between the two countries is much smaller.
To know more about GDP per capita refer here
https://brainly.com/question/13601488#
#SPJ11
e-eyes has a new issue of preferred stock it calls 20/20 preferred. the stock will pay a $20 dividend per year, but the first dividend will not be paid until 20 years from today. if you require a return of 6.8 percent on this stock, how much should you pay today?
If you require a return of 6.8 percent on this stock, you should pay $294.12 today to purchase one share of the 20/20 preferred stock.
To calculate the price of the 20/20 preferred stock, we need to find the present value of all future dividends discounted at the required rate of return of 6.8%.
Since the first dividend will not be paid until 20 years from today, we can use the formula for the present value of perpetuity:
Present Value = Annual Dividend / Required Rate of Return
The annual dividend is $20, so we can calculate the present value as follows:
Present Value = $20 / 0.068
Present Value = $294.12
Therefore, you should pay $294.12 today to purchase one share.
To know more about preferred stock refer here
https://brainly.com/question/32359644
#SPJ11
When a company uses one allocation base, it gives the appearance that when a company drops a segment, all overhead costs will:__________
When a company uses one allocation base, it gives the appearance that when a company drops a segment, all overhead costs associated with that segment will be eliminated.
This may or may not be the case, as the overhead costs may be shifted to other segments. In some cases, it can be beneficial for a company to drop a segment, as this may free up resources to be used in other areas.
In other cases, it may be more beneficial to keep the segment, as the overhead costs associated with that segment may be better allocated across multiple segments. It is important to consider the overall impact of dropping a segment before making a final decision.
A thorough analysis of the costs, benefits, and potential outcomes should be conducted to ensure the decision is in the best interest of the company.
Know more about Interest here
https://brainly.com/question/30393144#
#SPJ11
rosa, the ceo of down home fashion, has legitimate power at work. employees are likely to do what rosa says because:
Employees are likely to do what Rosa says because she has legitimate power as the CEO of Down Home Fashion.
Legitimate power is the power that comes from a person's position or role within an organization. As the CEO of Down Home Fashion, Rosa has the authority to make decisions and give orders that are expected to be followed by her subordinates. This power is seen as legitimate because it is based on her position and responsibilities within the organization. Therefore, employees are likely to comply with her requests or orders because they understand that it is part of their job duties to do so.
Legitimate power is derived from an individual's position or role within an organization. As the CEO, Rosa has the authority to make decisions and give directions to her employees, who are expected to comply because they recognize her position and its associated responsibilities.
Learn more about legitimate power: https://brainly.com/question/11655781
#SPJ11
suppose there is a simple two good economy that produces fish and cars. when the economy increases its production of fish from 0 to 15 tons of fish, it has a relatively small opportunity cost in terms of cars. what is the most likely explanation for this? group of answer choices workers are being converted from the car sector to the fish sector that have a comparative advantage in the fish sector technical inefficiency when converting the resources the economy is better suited for car production technical inefficiency when converting the resources workers are being converted from the car sector to the fish sector that have a comparative advantage in the car sector
The most suitable explanation for the relatively small opportunity cost of increasing fish production from 0 to 15 tons in a simple two good economy that produces fish and cars is that workers are being converted from the car sector to the fish sector who have a comparative advantage in the fish sector.
This means that the workers are better at producing fish than cars, and so when they switch to producing more fish, the economy is able to produce more of it with relatively little sacrifice of car production.Comparative advantage is a fundamental concept in economics that explains why countries specialize in certain industries and trade with each other.
It means that a country or individual can produce a good at a lower opportunity cost than another, which leads to a more efficient allocation of resources and increased overall output. In this case, the workers who are switching to fish production likely have a natural talent or expertise in that area, making it easier for them to produce more fish with less of a sacrifice in car production.
To know more about opportunity cost click here
brainly.com/question/12121515
#SPJ11
PLEASE HELP PLEASE N THANK YOU .
Your friend Marco loves being on his phone and interacting on social media. He knows that you are studying different careers and asks you what kinds of careers he might consider that would allow him to learn more about communications. You know that advances in telecommunication are always being introduced, and in the future more and more people will be needed in the Energy cluster to design, create, advertise, and sell new ways of communicating. List two careers that he could pursue along the telecommunication pathway. What kind of skills or talents would he need in these two careers? How could he gain the talents or skills to succeed in these two careers?
For Marco, two prospective career paths along the telecommunication avenue stand out more than the rest—Telecommunications Engineer and Digital Marketing Specialist.
How should Marco make his choice?If Marco chooses to pursue the former role, problem-solving aptitude, programming savviness, circuit scheme competency, and grasping of transmission conduction would be essential.
Therefore it is strongly recommended that he accumulate specific qualifications in either electrical engineering, computer science, or telecommunications engineering as preparation.
As for becoming a Digital Marketing Expert, epitomes of communicability, originality, and nimbleness when being apprised regarding current digital promotion resources coupled with the capacity to assay data analytically should be implemented.
Read more about Telecommunications Engineer here:
https://brainly.com/question/29062236
#SPJ1
market share goals are often set by managers when multiple choice a target return objective has not been met previously. the product category is new. they are coupled with penetration pricing to establish a maximizing current profit objective. industry sales are relatively flat or declining. they insist on long-run profits.
Market share goals are often set by managers when c) they are coupled with penetration pricing to establish a maximizing current profit objective.
A company's market share is the percentage of the overall market for its products and services that it controls. Market share is an important business metric since it indicates a company's profitability and performance.
It might indicate an industry's dominance and how successfully a company's revenue-generating initiatives are performing to fulfill corporate objectives.
Market share can have an impact on operations, product and service pricing, and potentially stock market performance. Growing market share leads to increased revenue. As a result, a company can scale up its operations and increase its profitability. Gaining market share should be a serious business objective.
To know more about market share goals:
https://brainly.com/question/31194082
#SPJ4
Correct question:
Market share goals are often set by managers when
a) a target return objective has not been met previously.
b) the product category is new.
c) they are coupled with penetration pricing to establish a maximizing current profit objective.
d) industry sales are relatively flat or declining.
e) they insist on long-run profits.
Market share goals are set by managers to establish a maximizing current profit objective or when seeking long-run profits. This strategy is often employed in scenarios where industry sales are flat or declining, when introducing a new product, or under regulatory conditions such as price cap regulation.
Explanation:Market share goals are often set by managers when they are coupled with penetration pricing to establish a maximizing current profit objective, when industry sales are relatively flat or declining, or when companies insist on long-run profits. Market share is essentially the percentage of total sales in the market. Managers could use this strategy when the product category is new, looking to establish the brand in the market.
An example of this scenario could be a new technology firm entering an established market. The firm might have a goal to obtain a certain percentage of the market share within a given timescale, therefore a market share goal would be set.
Further, this can also be used as a strategy to affect competition. For instance, consider price cap regulation, where regulators set a price that a firm cannot exceed over a specific period. Firms may set market share goals under these conditions to increase competition.
Learn more about Market Share Goals here:https://brainly.com/question/32747939
#SPJ6
On 11/15/20, Jen purchased $100,000 of
TV Stock. On 6/1/21, the stock becomes completely
worthless. How should Jen treat this loss on her 2021 return?
On her 2021 tax return, Jen should treat the loss from the completely worthless TV stock as a capital loss.
Since Jen purchased the TV stock on 11/15/20 and it became completely worthless on 6/1/21, this investment falls under a long-term capital loss, as she held the stock for more than one year. In general, capital losses can be used to offset capital gains, and if there are any excess losses, they can be deducted from ordinary income up to a limit of $3,000 per year ($1,500 if married filing separately).
1. Determine the holding period: Jen held the stock from 11/15/20 to 6/1/21, which is more than one year, making it a long-term capital loss.
2. Calculate the loss: Jen's loss is $100,000 (the entire value of the stock).
3. Offset capital gains (if any): If Jen has any capital gains, she can use this loss to offset those gains.
4. Deduct the remaining loss from ordinary income: If there are excess losses, Jen can deduct up to $3,000 ($1,500 if married filing separately) from her ordinary income.
In summary, Jen should treat the loss from the completely worthless TV stock as a long-term capital loss on her 2021 tax return, offset any capital gains she might have, and potentially deduct the remaining loss from her ordinary income up to the allowable limit.
For more information on capital loss kindly visit to
https://brainly.com/question/23917348
#SPJ11
a petty cash fund is an efficient way to handle what type of payments? multiple choice question. interest payments inventory purchases accounts payable to vendors. low cost office supply purchases.
A petty cash fund is an efficient way to handle low-cost office supply purchases. These are small purchases that do not require the involvement of the accounting department or the approval of senior management.
By having a small amount of cash on hand, employees can purchase these items quickly and easily without having to go through a lengthy reimbursement process. The use of a petty cash fund can help streamline operations and reduce the administrative burden associated with these small purchases. Instead of employees having to submit expense reports for reimbursement, they can simply withdraw cash from the petty cash fund and make the necessary purchases. However, a petty cash fund is not typically used for inventory purchases, accounts payable to vendors, or interest payments. These types of transactions usually involve larger amounts of money and require more extensive documentation and approvals. Petty cash funds are designed to handle small expenses, typically under $100, and are not appropriate for larger purchases or payments.
Learn more about petty cash fund here:
https://brainly.com/question/15258796
#SPJ11
a company with 300,000 authorized shares of $4 par common stock issued 120,000 shares at $8. subsequently, the company declared a 3% stock dividend on a date when the market price was $13 per share. what is the amount transferred from the retained earnings account to the paid-in capital accounts as a result of the stock dividend?
The amount transferred from the retained earnings account to the paid-in capital accounts as a result of the stock dividend is $4,428.
To calculate the amount transferred from the retained earnings account to the paid-in capital accounts as a result of the stock dividend, we need to follow a few steps:
Calculate the total par value of the issued shares:
Total par value = Number of shares issued × Par value per shareTotal par value = 120,000 shares × $4 par value per shareTotal par value = $480,000Calculate the value of the stock dividend:
Stock dividend = Total par value × Stock dividend percentageStock dividend = $480,000 × 3%Stock dividend = $14,400Determine the number of additional shares issued as a result of the stock dividend:
Number of additional shares = Stock dividend value / Market price per shareNumber of additional shares = $14,400 / $13 market price per shareNumber of additional shares ≈ 1,107.69 (rounded down to 1,107 shares)Calculate the par value of the additional shares:
Par value of additional shares = Number of additional shares × Par value per sharePar value of additional shares = 1,107 shares × $4 par value per sharePar value of additional shares = $4,428Calculate the amount transferred from retained earnings to paid-in capital:
Amount transferred = Par value of additional sharesAmount transferred = $4,428Therefore, the amount transferred from the retained earnings account to the paid-in capital accounts as a result of the stock dividend is $4,428.
Learn more about dividend : brainly.com/question/2960815
#SPJ11
Walton Corporation sells products for $37 each that have variable costs of $15 per unit. Walton's annual fixed cost is $486,200. Required Use the per-unit contribution margin approach to determine the break-even point in units and dollars. Break-even point in units Break-even point in dollars
To calculate the break-even point using the per-unit contribution margin approach, we need to first calculate the per-unit contribution margin. Per-unit contribution margin = selling price - variable costs
Per-unit contribution margin = $37 - $15
Per-unit contribution margin = $22
Next, we can use the formula for the break-even point in units:
Break-even point (units) = Annual fixed cost / Per-unit contribution margin
Break-even point (units) = $486,200 / $22
Break-even point (units) = 22,100 units
Therefore, Walton Corporation needs to sell 22,100 units in order to break even.
To calculate the break-even point in dollars, we can multiply the break-even point (units) by the selling price:
Break-even point (dollars) = Break-even point (units) x Selling price
Break-even point (dollars) = 22,100 units x $37
Break-even point (dollars) = $817,700
Therefore, Walton Corporation needs to generate $817,700 in sales in order to break even.
To know more about per-unit contribution margin
https://brainly.com/question/27773337
#SPJ11
a job was budgeted to require 5 hours of labor per unit at $10.00 per hour. the job consisted of 8,900 units and was completed in 41,500 hours at a total labor cost of $447,600. what is the direct labor rate variance?
The Direct Labor Rate Variance is $2,600. The direct labor rate variance measures the difference between the actual cost of labor and the budgeted cost of labor for a particular job.
In this case, the budgeted labor cost per unit was $50 ($10 per hour x 5 hours per unit), and the total budgeted labor cost for the job was $445,000 ($50 x 8,900 units). However, the actual labor cost for the job was $447,600, which is $2,600 more than the budgeted cost.
To calculate the direct labor rate variance, we need to compare the actual hours worked to the budgeted hours and apply the budgeted labor rate. In this case, the actual hours worked were 41,500, which is the same as the budgeted hours. Therefore, the direct labor rate variance is simply the difference between the actual labor cost and the budgeted labor cost:
Direct Labor Rate Variance = Actual Labor Cost - Budgeted Labor Cost
Direct Labor Rate Variance = $447,600 - $445,000
Direct Labor Rate Variance = $2,600 (Favorable)
The favorable variance means that the actual labor cost was lower than the budgeted labor cost. This could be due to a lower hourly rate or more efficient use of labor hours. It is important to analyze variances to identify areas of improvement and to make adjustments to the budget or operations as necessary.
For more about direct labor rate:
https://brainly.com/question/14259749
#SPJ11
14. A hybrid costing system would be appropriate for a company that manufactures several varieties of jam.
Answer: False, a hybrid costing system would not be appropriate for a company that manufactures several varieties of jam. Hope this helps! :)
The statement given "A hybrid costing system would be appropriate for a company that manufactures several varieties of jam." is true because a hybrid costing system would be appropriate for a company that manufactures several varieties of jam.
A hybrid costing system combines elements of both job costing and process costing systems. This allows a company to use different costing methods for different types of products or production processes.
In the case of a company that manufactures several varieties of jam, a hybrid costing system would be appropriate because each variety of jam may require different production processes and have different costs associated with it. Job costing would be appropriate for the production of customized or specialized jams, while process costing would be more appropriate for the production of standard or mass-produced jams.
Using a hybrid costing system would allow the company to accurately allocate costs to each product or production process, and provide more accurate information for decision-making and pricing strategies. This would help the company to better understand its profitability for each variety of jam, and make more informed decisions about which products to continue producing and which to discontinue.
"
Complete question
A hybrid costing system would be appropriate for a company that manufactures several varieties of jam.
True
False
"
You can learn more about hybrid costing system at
https://brainly.com/question/31377586
#SPJ11
in which of the following situations would personal selling be the least cost-effective choice? question 23 options: a computer systems firm selling hardware and software to a large business an automobile dealer selling luxury cars a real estate agent selling a home a chain of supermarkets selling convenience products a manufacturer selling a line of running shoes to a chain of department stores
Out of the given options, the situation in which personal selling would be the least cost-effective choice would be a chain of supermarkets selling convenience products.
This is because convenience products are low-priced items that are purchased frequently and do not require significant investment from the buyer. Therefore, personal selling may not be necessary as customers tend to make their purchasing decisions based on convenience, price, and location.
Additionally, supermarkets typically have a high volume of foot traffic, making it difficult for sales representatives to provide personalized attention to each customer. Instead, supermarkets may benefit from other marketing strategies such as in-store promotions, advertisements, and product placement to attract customers and increase sales.
To know more about investment refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/15105766
#SPJ11
When the simple regression equation y; = B2 + B2x, +u,, t=1,2,...,I is written in matrix notation, the OLS estimator is ß =(XX)" Xy. Then: Select one: A. X'X has dimension 2 x 2 and its inverse can always be found. B. X'y has dimension 2 x1 C. B^ has dimension 1x1 i.e. it is a scalar D. X'X has dimension T x T and its inverse can not always be found. E. X'y has dimension T x1
Previous question
X'y has dimension T x1 of the equation and scalar D .The correct answer is E.
In matrix notation, the simple regression equation can be written as y = Xß + u, where y is an I x 1 vector of the dependent variable, X is an I x 2 matrix of the independent variable (with the first column being all ones for the intercept), ß is a 2 x 1 vector of coefficients (including the intercept), and u is an I x 1 vector of the error term.
To estimate ß using ordinary least squares (OLS), we minimize the sum of squared residuals (SSR), which can be expressed as SSR = (y - Xß)'(y - Xß). Taking the derivative of SSR with respect to ß and setting it equal to zero yields the OLS estimator ß = (X'X)-1 X'y.
X'X is a 2 x 2 matrix that represents the sum of squares and cross-products of the independent variable. Its inverse can be found as long as it is non-singular, which requires that the columns of X are linearly independent. However, the dimension of X'X equation with scalar D is not T x T, as T is not explicitly given in the question.
X'y is a 2 x 1 matrix that represents the sum of cross-products between the independent and dependent variable. Its dimension is T x 1, where T is the number of observations.
B^ does not have dimension 1x1, as it is a vector of length 2 (including the intercept and slope coefficient).
For more information on equations with dimension and scalar D refer https://brainly.com/question/356987
#SPJ11