Answer:
El estado de emergencia por el coronavirus ha impuesto una situación inusual en la mayor parte del mundo civilizado: ha obligado al confinamiento de miles de millones de personas, con el objetivo de frenar la circulación del virus y así reducir la tasa de contagios, frenando la escalada de muertes que esta enfermedad ha causado.
Ahora bien, el confinamiento ha alterado las dinámicas laborales y domésticas en toda la sociedad: ha llevado a la suspensión y el desempleo de millones de trabajadores, mientras los mas afortunados comenzaron a desarrollar sus empleos a través del teletrabajo. Esto ha modificado las relaciones interpersonales a nivel laboral, pero mayormente a nivel doméstico, ya que las personas pasan todo su tiempo en sus hogares, en vez de mantener un ritmo de vida rutinario con salidas constantes de su domicilio.
En este contexto, es necesario el compromiso y el desarrollo de acuerdos que propendan a evitar posibles conflictos. Estos compromisos deben basarse en criterios democráticos y equitativos, que puedan imponer un manto de justicia e igualdad en las tareas domesticas y el uso de los determinados espacios y cosas del hogar.
En ese sentido, un compromiso democrático que pudiese pactarse en medio del confinamiento por coronavirus sería la división democrática y equitativa de las tareas del hogar, utilizando un medio de selección neutro e imparcial como pudiera serlo un sorteo, donde todos y cada uno de los miembros de un hogar asumieran responsabilidades que propendan al bien común de la familia.
he state of New Jersey says it is sovereign over certain landfilled portions of Ellis Island. The state of New York disagrees, asserting that it is sovereign over the whole of the island. New Jersey brings an action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Should the court hear the case
Answer:
No, it shouldn't. In the present case, it is a conflict of interest between two states: the states of New York and New Jersey, with respect to Ellis Island and the inter-jurisdictional waters of the Hudson River. Therefore, due to being a controversial matter between two states, the provisions of Article III Section 2 of the United States Constitution, which establishes the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in the case. In addition, in case of recourse to the internal courts of a state, a state would be brought to litigate outside its original jurisdiction.
What are your final thoughts about Larry Lessig’s video and his arguments about copyright?
I believe that Larry Lessig's arguments are very important for us to understand copyright and its importance for those who own it. That's because Lessig can show us that creating something requires effort, work and dedication that are often demanded of a single person. Allowing anyone to use the work created by someone who has given so much of themselves can be cruel. In other words, through his arguments we can see that the creators have the total right to own their works and limit their destruction, since the creation of that work required so much of him / her.
To prevent collisions and violations at intersections that have traffic lights, use the ___ to ensure the intersection is clear before you enter it.
Answer:
Delayed acceleration technique
Explanation:
This refers to waiting to go through an intersection until you have a chance to search for other vehicles
Strickland attempted to bribe Judge Sylvania Woods to show leniency toward one of Strickland's friends who had a case pending before the judge. Judge Woods immediately reported this to the state's attorney and was asked to play along with Strickland until the actual payment of money occurred. Strickland gave $2,500 to the judge, who promptly turned it over to the state's attorney's office. Strickland was indicted for bribery, pled guilty, and was sentenced to a four-year prison term. Three months after the criminal trial, Strickland filed a motion for the return of his $2,500. Will the court order the return of his money
Answer:
No, the court will not return the $2500 back to Strickland but rather, the money has been forfeited to the government due to the circumstances around it.
Since the money was a bribe offered, it is within the view of the government to withheld the money as evidence as well as take the money due to the illegal purpose it tends to actualize when it was offered.
Explanation:
24.
Most police academies strive to blend training with education.
25.
Generally, basic preservice training is academy-based training that introduces recruits
to police work, provides an overview of the justice system, and includes classes on
specific skills and knowledge areas related to police work.
In addition to the traditional skill-based subjects (e.g., firearms, defensive tactics) and
concepts (e.g., criminal law) taught in basic pre-service training, recruits should be
required to master subjects related to
26.
27.
Obedience-oriented, military-style, stress recruit training programs
28.
Stress-related training in police academies, where it exists, should
29.
The Field training officer (FTO) is a knowledgeable, seasoned, and competent officer
trained in adult education and evaluation procedures, who supervises recruits' on-the-job
(field) training
Answer:
29 the field training officer fto
Who argues that individuals have natural rights to life, liberty, and property that constrain what government is allowed to do?
Answer:
John Locke
Explanation:
Answer:Locke
Explanation:
The Constitution protects free speech, free press, free assembly, and freedom of religion. Additionally, the Supreme Court has upheld protection for freedom of expression. How has this culture of freedom led to the society we have today?
Answer:
Explanation:
Today people are generally capable of expressing themselves freely as they want. It allows people to come together with all sorts of different backgrounds. It lets people choose their lifestyle.
A buyer has made an earnest money deposit of $6,500 on a house selling for $112,500. A lender has agreed to lend 85% of the purchase price at 6% interest for 30 years. If the buyer's closing costs amount to $4,375, how much additional cash must the buyer bring to closing?
Answer:
$14,750
Explanation:
Since the lender has agreed to lend 85% of the purchase price, the buyer must provide 15% of the purchase price.
Purchase Price = $112,500
Cash Deposit (15%) = 15% of 112,500 =0.15 X 112,500 =$16,875
Amount to be Paid by the buyer
= Cash Deposit + Closing Cost
=$16,875 + $4,375
=$21,250
Since the buyer has made an earnest money deposit of $6,500,
The additional cash which the buyer must bring to closing
=Amount to be Paid by the buyer - Earnest Deposit
=21250 - 6500
=$14,750
Cash is a form of legal cash than can be used to trade commodities or pay debts. The value of assets can be turned into cash quickly is commonly referred to as "cash".
Given Information:-
Deposit money=$6,500Sale price=$112,500Interest rate=6%closing costs=$4,375
Since the lender has agreed to lend 85% of the purchase price, the buyer must provide 15% of the purchase price.
Purchase Price = $112,500
Cash Deposit (15%) = 15% of 112,500 =0.15 X 112,500 =$16,875
Amount to be Paid by the buyer:-
= Cash Deposit + Closing Cost
=$16,875 + $4,375
=$21,250
Since, the buyer has made an earnest money deposit of $6,500,
The additional cash which the buyer must bring to closing
=Amount to be Paid by the buyer - Earnest Deposit
=21250 - 6500
=$14,750
To know more about purchase price, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/1698287
LEA
What is rule of law
Answer:
the principle that all people and institutions are subject to and accountable to law that isfairly applied and enforced; the principle of government by law.
How might Aristotle reply to the claim that individuals should be free to pursue their own conceptions of the good life and that participating in politics is only one life option among many? a) Participating in politics, broadly conceived as the practice of deliberation, is actually the condition for the ability to pursue one’s own conception of the good life. b) One can only achieve the good by receiving the highest honors in the city. c) Although the state should guide people’s life choices, it should not enforce any conception of the good through law. d) One should avoid participating in politics only if it detracts from one’s happiness. e) All of the above.
Answer:
Correct Answer:
e) All of the above.
Explanation:
Aristotle, as one of the greatest philosopher ever lived wrote discusses on various aspect of life. One of them was his works on good life. According to him, good life is one in which a person cultivates and exercises their rational faculties which could be engaging in scientific inquiry, philosophical discussion, artistic creation, or legislation. This is because,what separate humans from animals is the human reason to rationalize things.
Answer: A
Explanation:
When a contract does not accurately reflect the intentions of the parties because of some mechanical or clerical error in the document, what legal action is necessary to correct or modify the contract? Retraction Repeal Reformation Rescission
Reformation is the answer
Hope that helped :)
Which of the following best describes a green light purpose
[tex] \huge\bf{where \: is \: the \: pic}[/tex]
legal principles applicable to execution of a will in kenya
Answer:
In testate succession, you need to file the following documents • Form P.A 78 (petition) • Form P & A 3 (affidavit) • the original will plus 2 photocopies of the will & • original death certificate. contains the prayers, if one wants to be an executor or administrator.
Explanation:
Side note: there is a PDF form on google that you can look at about this topic also.
Officer Tom is executing a validly obtained search warrant in Kathryn's home. The warrant gives him the right to search every room in the house but is limited to a search for automatic weapons and handguns. When he walks into the kitchen, he sees an open box filled with small plastic bags containing small pills. A closer inspection reveals that the pills are ecstasy, an illegal narcotic. May Officer Tom seize the drugs even though the warrant did not include a search for drugs. Would the drugs be admissible in court?
Answer:
Drugs would not be admissible in court.
Explanation:
A warrant is a document that authorizes a bailiff to perform certain actions on behalf of the local court. In short, so that the police of a city can make searches in a house, arrest and confiscate objects, things and people, there must be a specific warrant that authorizes the situation, otherwise the police act against the law and have their activity disregarded. .
In the case shown in the question above, we can see that there was a warrant that made it possible to search all rooms in Kathryn's house, but it is limited to a search for automatic weapons and firearms. In this case, even if the police find illegal substances, he cannot arrest them, as he does not have this authorization. If he arrested the substances, they would be disregarded in court.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulates the
distribution of Gensol. The FDA is a federal executive
agency. Because it has rulemaking authority and may
impose fines against businesses in violation, it is known
as a:
non-regulatory agency.
regulatory agency.
rulemaking agency.
creation agency.
Answer:
it is known as a regulatory agency
Do you believe that there are too many lawsuits in the United States? If so, do you place more blame for the problem on lawyers or on individuals who go to court? Is there anything that would help the problem?
What if any are the positive outcomes of lawsuits?
Answer:
do a protest
Explanation: