Answer:b B, it was important avoid conflicts with eropean countries
Explanation:
Answer:
A
Explanation:
trust me
An obligation is an act or duty that someone is morally or legally bound to do. Which of the following is an obligation of a good citizen? voting for the same candidate as a friend putting campaign signs in one’s front yard getting good grades in college classes serving on a jury when called to do so
Answer: serving on a jury when called to do so
Explanation:
If asked to serve on a jury, it is a responsibility. An responsibility is an act or responsibility that someone is ethically or legally obligated to perform.
An responsibility is a legal need to contribute, do, or not do something. A responsibility or obligation is an act or way to proceed to which a person is ethically or legally obligated. Obligations that give a creditors or obligee the legal right to demand their fulfilment in a court of law.
So, Option "D" is the correct answer to the following question.
Learn more:
https://brainly.com/question/17071279?referrer=searchResults
The main reason George H.W. Bush was victorious in 1988 was the fact that he promised which of the following to voters?
Answer:
I think its B, i wasnt around then but hope i helped (:^])
Arrange the events that led to the September 11 attacks in the correct sequence.
Osama bin Laden’s organization of mujahideen fighters
rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan
beginning of the Cold war
attacks on US Embassies in North Africa September 11 attacks
US support of the mujahideen with weapons and training Soviet invasion of Afghanistan
the events that led to the September 11 attacks in the correct sequence are.
1.) beginning of the Cold war
2.) Soviet invasion of Afghanistan
3.) US support of the mujahideen with weapons and training
4.) rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan
5.) Osama bin Laden’s organization of mujahideen fighters
6.) attacks on US Embassies in North Africa
7.) September 11 attacks
Answer: Plato test takers I just took the test and this is the correct orde
1.) beginning of the Cold war
2.) Soviet invasion of Afghanistan
3.) US support of the mujahideen with weapons and training
4.) rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan
5.) Osama bin Laden’s organization of mujahideen fighters
6.) attacks on US Embassies in North Africa
7.) September 11 attacks
Explanation: Hope you click on enough of the brainly answers to get to this is the correct sequence
((Please help asap!! Will give brainliest to correct answer.
!!))
Use the map of Korea below to answer the following question:
Map above^^
The white line politically dividing Korea represents
Select one:
a. the Iron Curtain
b. the Berlin War
c. the 38th parallel
d. the Demarcation Line of 1954
Answer:
The white line politically dividing Korea represents the 38th parallel.After WWII Korea was divided at the 38th parallel for purposes of military occupation. This line then solidified into a political frontier between American-supported Republic of Korea and the Soviet backed Democratic People's Republic of Korea. North Korean troops swept across the 38th parallel to attack South Korea.
Explanation:
i hope this will help you :)
Answer:
D
Explanation:
This is still the line today, and notice how in some areas they are more into the north or some more into the south? The few days and even the few hours before the war ended. The commanders of both sides ordered their forces to make a massive push to claim as much land as they could for their country. How did that work out? It was nearly pointless. Still, the fact that a South Korea exists. And KPOP (For some people...) Exists.
Addendum: Plus, the 38th Parallel division was once a straight line until wars end.
Compare Mussolini's rise to power and totalitarian state in Italy that of Hitler's rise to power and totalitarian state in Germany.
Answer:
Explanation: Both, like most of the world then and now, was developing an economic depression from hordes of excess labor undercutting wages and depleting resources. Overpopulation was not under control anywhere then and the world had overwhelmed the current technology's ability to access sufficient resources for the expanding hordes of people. So it was once again time for the most desperate to attack neighbors and take their land and resources. WW I had slaughtered some excess people but its stagnant trench warfare did almost nothing to acquire more useful land for anyone.
The people of Italy, Spain, and Germany became interested in Marxist international socialist and fascist national socialist policies in their growing desperation. Because the national socialists promised to protect national industries and its jobs against foreign competition undercutting them, they won the competition between the two radical socialist philosophies.
Italy's Mussolini developed the fascist "corporatist" national socialist structure. It was a more efficient shallow bureaucratic system that "incorporated" each industry under a single government bureau that controlled it.
Spain and Germany copied Italy's model. Italy's economy started improving and it began more conquests south into Africa and east into the Balkans to feed it. Spain became mired with a war against its Marxists who were raging jealous against the national socialist's popularity "stealing" their proletariat from them. Communists from other countries, including the US, entered Spain to help their communists. The German national socialists sided with Franco, Spain's fascist leader, and helped defeat the communists in a fierce civil war made famous by writers like Hemingway.
Germany was the most successful with the system. It was well suited to the traditional German culture's stricter discipline and socialist origins (according to Marx). Their economy improved most rapidly and the world was fascinated at it's initial success until it began its conquest for the land needed by it's expanding population. LIke Greece, Rome, and France before it, it decided to take so much as it could, not just what it needed for the immediate future. The rest is history you should already know.
I hope this helps :D
Which of the following is true for both presidents roosevelt and wilson
Answer:
The options are
A. They believed in a policy of non-interference in Latin America.
B. They resorted frequently to the use of U.S. troops in Latin America.
C. They feared that Latin America countries would invade the United States.
D. They worked to promote human rights and national integrity in Latin America.
The answer is B. They resorted frequently to the use of U.S. troops in Latin America.
President Roosevelt and Wilson both ruled the US and were similar and different in their approach to various conditions.
Roosevelt believed in a policy of non-interference in Latin America while Wilson didn’t.They also had differences in fearing that Latin America countries would invade the United States and working to promote human rights and national integrity in Latin America. They had a similar policy in the aspect of resorting frequently to the use of U.S. troops in Latin America.
match the descriptions with the historical figures that they describe
Answer: good leaders
Explanation:
Diffrent chararistics
How did the religious beliefs of the Aztec and the conquistadores differ?
Answer:
How did the religious beliefs of the Aztec and the conquistadores differ? A. The Aztec worshiped multiple deities, while the conquistadores worshiped a single deity. ... The Aztec didn't perform religious rituals, while the conquistadores sacrificed animals.
Explanation:
how did Adams work for fairness for Native Americans
Explanation:
He overturned a treaty that was signed unfairly.
Answer:
He overturned a treaty signed with Creek nation because it he believed it was made unfairly with the natives.
art A Read the excerpt and answer the question that follows. The first object which saluted my eyes when I arrived on the coast was the sea, and a slave ship, which was then riding at anchor, and waiting for its cargo. These filled me with astonishment, which was soon converted into terror when I was carried on board. I was immediately handled and tossed up to see if I were sound by some of the crew; and I was now persuaded that I had gotten into a world of bad spirits, and that they were going to kill me. Their complexions too differing so much from ours, their long hair, and the language they spoke, (which was very different from any I had ever heard) united to confirm me in this belief. What were some of the differences Equiano observed between himself and the crew on the slave ship?
Answer:
The complexion
The language
The long hair
Explanation:
From this excerpt, the narrator describes his experience as he first arrived the coast and how his astonishment at seeing the sea was quickly converted to terror when he realized he was no longer a spectator but now a part of the slave ship.
He described the captors and spoke about their differences with other slaves which included their complexion, hair and language.
"Their complexions too differing so much from ours, their long hair, and the language they spoke, (which was very different from any I had ever heard). . ."
Describe the course of the war 1812 in 400 words
Answer:
I'll save you the points because my answer may not appease your guidelines. Here is it in basic form. America want's Canada or what is at the time just a territory of Great Britan with a little autonomy. Essentially a territory and if given leniency for the sake of governance it could be considered a puppet/dominion. Basically America was sick of the Britis. They took their sailors who at the time were getting taken by the numerically superior British Navy and well enslaved them for lack of better terms well the technical term is impressment but yeah its work against their will by that of a foreign power. It angered American Politicians and they felt that at this time they did not get the respect nor recognition they deserved. If Canada was indeed taken maybe the British would leave America alone and pursue the Monroe doctrine. Although unlike most modern Wars it was a war declared by Congress and approved by the president. Problem was we didn't really have a great Army or even one to begin with. You could argue some divisions of the Federal government did exist like Merchant marines, American legion, etc. but lets just say we didn't have a grandstanding army. We win, we loose, our navy ain't so hot. Our generals not so smart we burn Ontario. Go into Quebec it's cold so we get out. Canada burns us too and our White house. Madison somehow leads the people of D.C. to believe in him and surprisingly keeps moral up after their literal Capital is burnt. Also didn't really end until 1814. Also in D.C the invading British forces somehow by a miracle a tornado I kid you not pushed the British out of D.C. and stopped their invasion. Sometimes luck really was on America's side so if you believe in providence I mean that's a great example. Basically 1814 fort mchenry happens. Star Spangled banner. It's the entiphasis of America. Also flag is 15 stars 15 bars extremely unique but fitting for the time. General Andrew Jackson leads his men to victory. The entire city of Baltimore was into the effort. All races, creeds, and people united by one nation indivisible. That day proved to show how we could all one day be simply Americans. We won although being outnumbered and through each day of bombs bursting in air we came back with a bigger flag. This battle created our national anthem. There was a treaty signed between both nations. Basically agreeing to stop mess with one another and recognize each other. It even allowed for some trade so that was a positive. Some speculate on who actually won the War. Is it the British or Americans. Brits don't care since the Napolean wars and such and although I believe the Canadians do well they weren't exactly autonomous and didn't gain much quite either. America did not get to annex Canada but they did gain as some call it their second Independence and solidification into the world stage. They held off so we should give credit where its due. I usually say its a wish wash. A tie if you will. All gains were negated and all losses for very little political points. I say it matters and yet matters not. Lots of lives to be lost for little gain in land. I guess you can say it was just a war of pride although it did not start that way. It ended up just showing capabilities and even both sides really couldn't win at least without changing a large portion of each individual nations history. The brits lists a building America Lost a building and none lost land so yeah lots of people lost over political recognition and withdraw from aggressive tactics but such is war.
Explanation:
Which program denied American Indians the use of their languages, forced them to cut their hair, denied the practice of traditional ceremonies, and forced adoption of American names?
A.
the Dawes Severalty Act
B.
the Curtis Act
C.
the Trail of Tears
D.
Indian Boarding Schools
E.
the reservation lifestyle
D) Indian Boarding Schools
Answer:
its d
Explanation:
Property rights are important to individuals because they provide the
needed to secure credit. This
Mallows people to invest in small businesses or pay for education. Property rights also ensure
Y use of resources. That's because individuals will use their resources carefully and wisely to
profit
Answer:
Property rights are important to individuals because they provide the
collateral to secure credit. This credit allows people to invest in small businesses or pay for education. Property rights also ensure efficient use of resources. That’s because individuals will use their resources carefully and wisely to maximize profit.
Explanation:
Which of the following was not a device that advertisers used to try and sell more goods to
maximize their profits in the late 1800s?
Answer: what are the options
Explanation:
Where were scientific advancements being made during the dark ages
Answer:
During the time period in the dark ages, there several scientific advancements that were made that changed the world. These things are:
1. Mechanical clock
2. Printing press
3. Gunpowder
4. Water and Wind Mills
5. Eye glasses
6. Public library
7. Paper money
8. Quadrant and Astrolabe
Explanation:
Answer:
China
Explanation:
Scientific advancements were being made in China.
How did the 20th-century independence movement in Vietnam differ from the
one in India?
A. The Vietnamese movement was a popular nationalist revolution,
while the Indian movement was part of a proxy war.
B. The Vietnamese movement produced a new democratic state,
while the Indian movement produced a communist state.
C. The Vietnamese movement removed a European colonial power,
while the Indian movement reformed a colonial government
D. The Vietnamese movement escalated into a full-scale
revolutionary war, while the Indian movement was largely
nonviolent
Answer: B the vietnamese movement was a popular nationalist revoulution, while indian movement was part of a proxy war.
Explanation:
Select the answer that matches the following definition. This purpose of joint operations is to maintain an arsenal capable of deterring potential adversaries and to assure U.S. allies and other security partners that they can count on America's security commitments
Answer:
Deter and defeat aggression.
Explanation:
The United States Armed Forces is the agency formed by the US that consists of military forces, that is, Army, Marine Corps, Navy, and so on.
Deter and Defeat aggression is one of the primary mission of the US Armed Forces. Under this mission the US is able to deter and defeat aggression of the enemy. A true deterrence is considered to be the one in whic army is able to deny an aggressor from achieving his purposes and to impose necessary penalties on the aggressor. Under this purpose, the US Armed Force is able to ensure the safety and security of territory and population.
The given definition is concerned with the primary purpose of 'Deter and Defeat Aggression' of the US Armed Forces.
Why must the misuse of prescription and illegal drugs be avoided? reduces the risk of serious side effects decreases blood pressure reduces respiratory diseases decreases the risk of cancer
Answer: Reduces the risk of serious side effects.
Explanation:
Answer:
reduces the risk of serious side effects
hope this helps.
The English Bill of Rights (1689), which guarantees the freedom of speech, the right to a fair trial, and a ban on cruel or unusual punishment, inspired the US Bill of Rights, which is another name for
Answer:
The set of the first 10 amendments to the Constitution of the United States.
Explanation:
Bill of Rights is the name given to the set of the first 10 amendments to the United States Constitution, approved as a consequence of political pressure exerted by the anti-federalists, who wanted to guarantee that the individual rights of citizens were not curtailed by eventual tyrannical governments, and ratified in 1791.
Thus, these amendments began to protect the individual as a subject of rights, based on the principles of the Enlightenment and understanding man as the bearer of the fundamental rights to life and liberty. Thus, they guaranteed these rights to American citizens (not to African Americans, who were not considered citizens).
Answer:
The first ten amendments to the Constitution.
Explanation:
Write a paragraph of 5-8 sentences explaining how change in the 1920s led to a rise of fear and hatred by some people. What could leaders or people do to prevent this from happening in the feature?
Answer:
in the 1920s the usa had the great depression and many people staved because of less food leaders could have shared food but people went crazy
Explanation:
i learn about this in history hope it helps
Write a petition of at least two paragraphs explaining your proposal for a new law or government measure. Be sure to aim it at the right audience, explain why your proposal is important, and describe how you will pay for it.
Racism in the judicial and law systems is something that matters to me. This issue can be addressed through legal measures by changing laws, changing police training, and demanding change from governments, companies, and people in higher power who are able to make the change. This issue should matter to everyone. It should matter to every person even if it doesn't affect them because it is just wrong and disgusting. People of color lose their lives at the hands of police because of an unjust system and people should consider why this is happening. I would want my law to distinctly change the behavior from people and cops towards people of color. Anything that needs to happen and be addressed for it to be changed should be taken in to account. Having laws and different training against racial discrimination in our system would most likely decrease hate crimes commit by police towards any person of color. If people were trained against it and it was illegal to do so, maybe people would realize that they need to stop. This law would decrease unnecessary deaths, attacks, and criminalization of POC. People should support this because it is wrong. There are wrongful deaths, arrests, and hate crimes happening towards innocent people because of race. This system is corrupted and needs to be changed to be just and fair. It would be funded by donations and lowering the funds towards the government, police, etc.
6. Describe a time in the debate when someone made a point and did not back it up
with strong reasons and evidence.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, the question is incomplete because it does not provide what kind of debate it is referring to, or who were their protagonists.
However, we can comment on the following.
As we do not know what debate the question is referring to, lets put an example when a candidate did not provide hard data or back it up
with strong reasons and evidence.
In the last presidential election, the Republican candidate accused immigrants to be dangerous people that killed American citizens in the border zone. He told that they were a threat to America. It was a simple accusation just to enrage their followers. He did not prove it with serious data. Indeed, the Media published that there had been many more crimes committed by American citizens that immigrants. But what the candidate wanted to create was a sentiment of hate to support its platform against immigration.
Answer:
In the last presidential election, the Republican candidate accused immigrants to be dangerous people that killed American citizens in the border zone
Explanation:
4. Which of the following descriptions apply to both John Locke and Thomas Hobbes?
French philosopher
English philospher
English mathematician
French mathematician
Answer:
English philosopher
Explanation:
Both John Locke and Thomas Hobbes are very well-known english philosphers for their massive contribution to the field of english philosophy and related fields such as political philosophy as well. Both are also fairly known for their contribution in English Enlightment or widely known as just Enlightment.
Both shared common world views and some extreme views unfit for current times but were substantially great for their times.
Hobbes believed that being selfish and bad is people's nature so need for absolute monarch or authority is a must as it will keep people's behavior in check and establish societal peace and prosperity.
Locke had similar perspectives on nature of people and is well known for his ideas about rebellion and government's role. He viewed government as this entity which is in place to protect people's rights so if government doesn't do that people have right to overthrow it and make a new one.
English philospher is the descriptions apply to both John Locke and Thomas Hobbes. Hence, option B is correct.
What is the concept of the passage?John Locke and Thomas Hobbes are both well-known English philosophers due to their substantial contributions to English philosophy and related fields like political philosophy. Both enjoy a respectable reputation for their contributions to the English Enlightenment, more commonly referred to as the Enlightenment.
Hobbes believed that in order to preserve societal harmony and prosperity, there must be an absolute ruler or power because selfishness and bad behavior are inherently a part of human nature.
Locke, who is renowned for his thoughts about insurrection and the function of the state, held similar beliefs about human nature. He believes that the government is a body established to protect citizens' rights.
Thus, option B is correct.
For more information about concept of the passage, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/1476553
#SPJ5
According to Bolívar, how should senators be chosen?
Answer: The office should be passed from father to son. HOPE IT HELPED <3
Which of the following was shipped from Europe to Africa?
EUROPE
NORTH
AMERICA
AFRICA
SOUTH
AMERICA
O A. Guns
B. Cotton
O C. Spices
D. Slaves
I believe it was spices.
Answer: A. Guns
Explanation:
Hitler's hatred of the Jews began with what assumption
Which sentence contains a dangling modifier? Hungry after practice, the team gobbled up their sandwiches. Looking through his backpack, Tyler finally spotted his calculator. After trying the new recipe, chicken pizza tasted delicious. With a sigh of exhaustion, Mrs. Granger put her feet up.
Answer:
After trying the new recipe, chicken pizza tasted delicious.
Explanation:
Dangling modifiers are those words or phrases that are used as modifiers of a particular word but is often misinterpreted as modifying some other word. They may be placed in such a way that their intended modifying work is instead taken or interpreted as modifying a different word.
Among the given sentences, the dangling modifier is found in sentence 3. The proposed meaning of the sentence was supposed to be that after trying a new recipe, a person/ persons found that chicken pizza tasted delicious. But, with the way the sentence has been grammatically structured, it seemed as it the new recipe was tried and taste by the chicken.
Thus, the third option is the correct answer.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
1. What "American truism' was re-confirmed by the 2008 elections? Why does the author take that position?
Answer and Explanation:
Undecideds always vote for the challenger, so they voted for Barak Obama. His campaign was staged in the limelight of change. He raised the slogan, “Washington must change.” The change against prolonged US war policy in Iraq. While John McCain emphasized his experience and supported the war in continuation of George W. Bush’s war policies. Moreover, Obama`s firm standing with his ideology during the times of significant financial crisis in 2008 established trust in his name. Meanwhile, McCain suspended the election campaign. The emerged challenger`s role of Barak Obama staged him with a tremendous decisive victory.
First time in American history that more than half of the voters’ population went online to get connected to the election process in 2008 elections, according to the Pew Internet & American Life Project. This represents fifty-five percent of the American adult population. The internet`s role in the 2008 elections painted true colors of the technology revolution in the millennials era.
What wasWhich technological advance did not become popular in the 1920s?
Answer:
Indoor Plumbing
Explanation:
During the 1920s, American's society and culture changed in developing into new by introducing roaring twenty, with new gadgets which helped women getting to involve in modernity. Automobiles, the radio, television, the refrigerator, and electric razor were some of the inventions that became popular in the 1920s. Many people used chamber pots to relieve themselves, which would be put under the bed or in a closet. In the 1920s, city people had indoor bathrooms and running water. Indoor plumbing arrives in rural areas during the 1930s. Farm families living in the country were accustomed to older methods of drawing water from wells and hand pumps as they did not have a water supply system.
Answer: Televisions
Explanation: I chose plumbing on the test and got it wrong. The correct answer is televisions.
Describe three examples of anti-democratic actions by the U.S. during and after the war.
Answer:
The Middle East, Afghanistan and Taliban regime and World War I
Explanation:
During the World War I, promises were made to restore pleasant democratic practices and to ensure the rule of law take it course, apparently all these were short-lived when these promises were not effectively delivered. George W. Bush also held out promises during and after the war in Iraq which was to oust the sitting regime of Saddam Hussein so as to restore democracy and make it safe for the citizens. This later turned out to be the same disappointment and anti-democratic conclusions that were followed by Woodrow Wilson in the First World War and the Middle East was engaged in endless cycles of bloodshed after the war. A third example is that of the Taliban Regime in Afghanistan that ended in the same fate and it turned out that most times, promises that were made were likely not being prepared to be fulfilled by those who made them.