Answer:
a. The effect on reported income in 2020 is a foreign exchange gain of $6,400.
b-1. The effecton reported income in 2020 is a foreign exchange loss of -$12,800.
b-1. The effect on reported income in 2021 is a foreign exchange gain of $9,600.
c-1. The effect on reported income in 2020 is a foreign exchange loss of -$6,400.
c-1. The effect on reported income in 2021 is a foreign exchange gain of $9,600.
Explanation:
a. Assume that Spindler acquired the surfboards on September 1, 2020, and made payment on December 1, 2020. What is the effect of the exchange rate fluctuations on reported income in 2020?
Since the U.S. Dollar per Brazilian Real on 1-Sep-20 is higher than the U.S. Dollar per Brazilian Real on 31-Dec-20, the effect of the exchange rate fluctuations on reported income in 2020 is a foreign exchange gain calculated as follows:
Foreign exchange gain on 31-Dec-20 = Value of surfboards in Brazilian real * (U.S. Dollar per Brazilian Real on 1-Sep-20 - U.S. Dollar per Brazilian Real on 31-Dec-20) = BRL640,000.00 * ($0.24 - $0.23) = $6,400
b. Assume that Spindler acquired the surfboards on December 1, 2020, and made payment on March 1, 2021. What is the effect of the exchange rate fluctuations on reported income in 2020 and 2021?
b-1. Since the U.S. Dollar per Brazilian Real on 1-Dec-20 is lower than the U.S. Dollar per Brazilian Real on 31-Dec-20, the effect of the exchange rate fluctuations on reported income in 2020 is a foreign exchange loss calculated as follows:
Foreign exchange loss on 31-Dec-20 = Value of surfboards in Brazilian real * (U.S. Dollar per Brazilian Real on 1-De-20 - U.S. Dollar per Brazilian Real on 31-Dec-20) = BRL640,000.00 * ($0.23 - $0.25) = -$12,800
b-2. Since the U.S. Dollar per Brazilian Real on 31-Dec-20 is higher than the U.S. Dollar per Brazilian Real on 1-Mar-21, the effect of the exchange rate fluctuations on reported income in 2021 is a foreign exchange gain calculated as follows:
Foreign exchange gain on 31-Mar-21 = Value of surfboards in Brazilian real * (U.S. Dollar per Brazilian Real on 1-Dec-20 - U.S. Dollar per Brazilian Real on 1-Mar-21) = BRL640,000.00 * ($0.25 - $0.235) = $9,600
c. Assume that Spindler acquired the surfboards on September 1, 2020, and made payment on March 1, 2021. What is the effect of the exchange rate fluctuations on reported income in 2020 and in 2021?
c-1. Since the U.S. Dollar per Brazilian Real on 1-Sep-20 is lower than the U.S. Dollar per Brazilian Real on 31-Dec-20, the effect of the exchange rate fluctuations on reported income in 2020 is a foreign exchange loss calculated as follows:
Foreign exchange loss on 31-Dec-20 = Value of surfboards in Brazilian real * (U.S. Dollar per Brazilian Real on 1-Sep-20 - U.S. Dollar per Brazilian Real on 31-Dec-20) = BRL640,000.00 * ($0.24 - $0.25) = -$6,400
c-2. Since the U.S. Dollar per Brazilian Real on 31-Dec-20 is higher than the U.S. Dollar per Brazilian Real on 1-Mar-21, the effect of the exchange rate fluctuations on reported income in 2021 is a foreign exchange gain calculated as follows:
Foreign exchange gain on 31-Mar-21 = Value of surfboards in Brazilian real * (U.S. Dollar per Brazilian Real on 1-Dec-20 - U.S. Dollar per Brazilian Real on 1-Mar-21) = BRL640,000.00 * ($0.25 - $0.235) = $9,600
Clothing retail stores are an example of this market structure.
a monopoly
monopolistic competition
perfect competition
an oligopoly
Answer:Monopolistic Competition
Explanation:
Savers make deposits and investments in order to earn what?
Why don't savers invest their money directly with the businesses?
Answer:
Savers make deposits and investment in order to earn interest on their money. This often works very well because they do not earn only interest as a percentage of their money, but also interest as a percentage of previously accrued interest, something known as compound interest.
Savers do not invest their money directly with the businesses because real economic activity tends to be riskier (although it could also be more profitable for this same reason). This is why they often prefer to invest the money on financial instruments.
Financial analysis Group of answer choices uses historical financial statements and is thus useful only to assess past performance uses historical financial statements and is thus useful only to assess past performance uses historical financial statements to measure a company's performance and in making financial projections of future performance. is accounting record-keeping using generally accepted accounting principles
Answer:
uses historical financial statements to measure a company's performance and in making financial projections of future performance.
Explanation:
Financial accounting is an accounting technique used for analyzing, summarizing and reporting of financial transactions like sales costs, purchase costs, payables and receivables of an organization using standard financial guidelines such as Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and financial accounting standards board (FASB).
Financial analysis uses historical financial statements to measure a company's performance and in making financial projections of future performance.
In Financial accounting, the horizontal financial analysis can be defined as an analysis and evaluation of a financial statement which illustrates or gives information about changes in the amount of corresponding financial statement items, benchmarks or financial ratio over a specific period of time. It is one of the most important technique that is used to measure how a business is doing financially. Hence, it is also referred to as the trend analysis.
Under the horizontal analysis of financial statement, we use the financial statements of two or more periods; earliest and latter periods.
Generally, the earliest is chosen as the base period while all other items on the statement for a latter period will be compared with the items on the statement of the base period.
Selected transactions for Therow Corporation during its first month in business are presented below.
Sept. 1 Issued common stock in exchange for $20,000 cash received from investors.
5 Purchased equipment for $9,000, paying $3,000 in cash and the balance on account.
8 Performed services on account for $18,000.
14 Paid salaries of $1,200.
25 Paid $4,000 cash on balance owed for equipment.
30 Paid $500 cash dividend.
Required:
a. Prepare a tabular analysis of the transactions.
b. Journalize the transactions. Do not provide explanations.
c. Post the transactions to T-accounts.
Answer:
Therow Corporation
a) Tabular Analysis of Transactions:
Assets = Liabilities + Equity
1. Cash $20,000 = + Common Stock $20,000
2. Cash -$3,000
Equipment $9,000 = $6,000
3. Accounts
Receivable $18,000 = + Retained Earnings $18,000
4. Cash -$1,200 + Retained Earnings -$1,200
5. Cash -$4,000 -$4,000
6. Cash -$500 + Retained Earnings -$500
b. Sept. 1:
Debit Cash $20,000
Credit Common Stock $20,000
Sept. 5:
Debit Equipment $9,000
Credit Cash $3,000
Credit Accounts Payable $6,000
Sept. 8:
Debit Accounts Receivable $18,000
Credit Service Revenue $18,000
Sept. 14:
Debit Salaries Expense $1,200
Credit Cash $1,200
Sept. 25:
Debit Accounts Payable $4,000
Credit Cash $4,000
Sept. 30:
Debit Dividends $500
Credit Cash $500
c. T-accounts:
Cash
Account Titles Debit Credit
Common Stock $20,000
Equipment $3,000
Salaries Expense 1,200
Accounts payable 4,000
Dividends 500
Accounts Receivable
Account Titles Debit Credit
Service Revenue $18,000
Common Stock
Account Titles Debit Credit
Cash $20,000
Equipment
Account Titles Debit Credit
Cash $3,000
Accounts payable 6,000
Accounts Payable
Account Titles Debit Credit
Equipment $6,000
Cash $4,000
Service Revenue
Account Titles Debit Credit
Accounts receivable $18,000
Salaries Expense
Account Titles Debit Credit
Cash $1,200
Dividends
Account Titles Debit Credit
Cash $500
Explanation:
a) Data and Analysis:
Sept. 1: Cash $20,000 Common Stock $20,000
Sept. 5: Equipment $9,000 Cash $3,000 Accounts Payable $6,000
Sept. 8: Accounts Receivable $18,000 Service Revenue $18,000
Sept. 14: Salaries Expense $1,200 Cash $1,200
Sept. 25: Accounts Payable $4,000 Cash $4,000
Sept. 30: Dividends $500 Cash $500
On June 30, 2021, the High Five Surfboard Company had outstanding accounts receivable of $720,000. On July 1, 2021, the company borrowed $570,000 from the Equitable Finance Corporation and signed a promissory note. Interest at 10% is payable monthly. The company assigned specific receivables totaling $720,000 as collateral for the loan. Equitable Finance charges a finance fee equal to 1.2% of the accounts receivable assigned.
Required: Prepare the journal entry to record the borrowing on the books of High Five Surfboard. (If no entry is required for a transaction/event, select "No journal entry required" in the first account field.)
Answer:
Dr Cash$561,360
Dr Finance charge expense $8,640
Cr Finance arrangement $570,000
Explanation:
Preparation of the journal entry to record the borrowing on the books of High Five Surfboard.
Dr Cash$561,360
[$570,000-($720,000*1.2%)]
$570,000-$8,640
=$561,360
Dr Finance charge expense $8,640
($720,000*1.2%)
Cr Finance arrangement $570,000
(Being to record the borrowing on the books of High Five Surfboard )
The Richmond Corporation uses the weighted-average method in its process costing system. The company has only a single processing department. The company's ending work in process inventory on August 31 consisted of 18,000 units. The units in the ending work in process inventory were 100% complete with respect to materials and 60% complete with respect to labor and overhead. If the cost per equivalent unit for August was $2.75 for materials and $4.25 for labor and overhead, the total cost assigned to the ending work in process inventory was:
Answer:
$95,400
Explanation:
Step 1 : Find the equivalent units of production in Ending Work in Progress
Materials = 18,000 x 100 % = 18,000 units
Conversion costs = 18,000 x 60 % = 10,800 units
Step 2 : Calculate the Cost of units in Ending Work in Progress
Cost of units in Ending Work in Progress = 18,000 x $2.75 + 10,800 x $4.25
= $95,400
Conclusion :
The ending work in process inventory was $95,400.
Helppppp pleaseeee!!!!!!!!!
A borrower is interested in comparing the monthly payments on two otherwise equivalent 30 year FRMs. Both loans are for $100,000 and have a 7% interest rate. Loan 1 is fully amortizing, where as Loan 2 has negative amortization with a $120,000 balloon payment due at the end of the life of the loan. How much higher is the monthly payment on loan 1 versus loan 2
Answer:
The monthly payment in Loan 1 is higher than in loan 2 by:
(665.30 - 566.94) = $98.36
Explanation:
Solution:
Comparison of Loan 1 and Loan 2 in terms of monthly payments.
For the first loan, we have to calculate equal monthly payments with the following details:
Principal = $ 100,000,
Monthly Interest rate = 7/12 = 0.58% ,
Term = 360 months
Use the PV = C (1 - (1+r)-n ) / r ,
where PV = Principal, r = monthly rate, n = 360 and
find C (EMI) = $665.30
NOTE: (Excel function is used: PMT(rate, year, PV) formula for convenience)
For Loan 2, we have to understand a few things.
The original loan principal is $ 100,000,
but you are allowed to do a balloon payment of $ 120000 at the end of 30 years.
The present value of the Balloon payment can be deducted from the principal to find out the monthly cash payments to be done.
The monthly payments will of course be lower since a lump sum balloon payment is done at the end.
The calculation is similar to the above. In this scenario, the Monthly payment comes out to be $ 566.94
Hence,
The monthly payment in Loan 1 is higher than in loan 2 by:
(665.30 - 566.94) = $98.36
Since a cell phone is a private good, if Neha chooses to spend $300 on a cell phone, Neha would get $300 of benefit from the cell phone and Teresa wouldn't receive any benefit from Neha's choice. If Neha still spends $300 on a cell phone and Teresa chooses to contribute $300 to the public park, Neha would still receive the $270 of benefit from Teresa's generosity. In other words, if Neha decides to keep the $300 for a cell phone and Teresa decides to contribute the $300 to the public project, then Neha would receive a total benefit of $300 $270
Answer:
In other words, if Neha decides to keep the $300 for a cell phone and Teresa decides to contribute the $300 to the public project, then Neha would receive a total benefit of:
$570.
Explanation:
Neha has, in this situation, maximized his benefits to the detriment of the public good. This is an illustration of the tragedy of the commons. The tragedy of the common is an economic problem that explains the loss that the society incurs when some persons like Neha neglect to contribute to the common good because they are solely concentrated on pursuing their individual goals for personal gains.
You are the beneficiary of a life insurance policy. The insurance company informs you that you have two options for receiving the insurance proceeds. You can receive a one-time cash of $200,000 today or receive payments of $1,400 a month starting at the end of this month for 20 years. Assuming the APR is 6 percent with monthly compounding, which option should you take and why
Answer:
Option 1 PV lumpsum = $200000
Option2 PV of Annuity = $195413.08035 rounded off to $195413.08
Based on the present value of both the options, Option 1 should be chosen as it has a higher present value than option 2.
Explanation:
To decide on the best option to choose among the given two, we need to find the present value of both the options.
As the first option is to receive a lumpsum payment of $200000 today, the present value of this option is also equal to $200000 as it will be received today.
Option two, on the other hand, is an annuity as fixed payments will be received after equal intervals of time and for a limited time period and at the end of the period which satisfies the criteria of annuity ordinary. We will use the formula for the present value of annuity which is,
PV of Annuity = C * [( 1 - (1+r)^-n) / r]
Where,
C is the periodic paymentr is the rate of return of discount raten is the number of periodsThe periodic payment is provided as $1400. We are also provided with and APR of 6% which is the Annual rate. We will have to convert it into monthly rate by dividing it by 12. We are also provided with the number of years which we will need to convert into number of months by multiplying it by 12.
Monthly r = 6%/12 = 0.5%
Number of periods = 20 * 12 = 240
PV of Annuity = 1400 * [( 1 - (1+0.5%)^-240) / 0.5%]
PV of Annuity = $195413.08035 rounded off to $195413.08