Solve each of the following equations for the missing variable.

2x – 14 = -9


x = 10

x = 2.5


x = -2.5

x = -10

Answer: I think the answer is B.) 570

Answer:

what questions need to be done? We need to know the problems before we answer them. :/

you need to show his steps or else i cant find his mistake

Answer:

Know the properties of vertical angles.

Step-by-step explanation:

Vertical angles are equal to each other, so we must make them equal to each other in an equation:

6x+2=80

6x=78

x=13

Answer:

It is irrational

Step-by-step explanation:

Rational numbers do not have decimals.

Answer:

tuff

guess you will fail

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: the answer is the second one

Step-by-step explanation:

9514 1404 393

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The "associative property" can apply to any number of operations. The ones we're usually concerned with are multiplication and addition.

Basically, the associative property says you can regroup elements that have the same operation being performed on them. Effectively, that regrouping lets you perform the sequence of operations in whatever order you may choose.

For multiplication, the associative property can be written:

  (ab)c = a(bc)

This form matches the first of the choices shown:

  3(ab) = (3a)b

__

For addition, the associative property can be written:

  (a+b)+c = a+(b+c)

This form matches the second of the choices shown:

  (3 + a) + b = 3 + (a + b)

__

If you must select one answer, you need to know which associative property you're talking about.

Answer:

Decision rule

Fail to reject the null  hypothesis

Conclusion

The sample evidence is not sufficient to conclude that more than three out of four financial institutions that offer online banking facilities are prone to fraud.

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

  The sample size is  n =  214

   The sample proportion is p = 0.78

   The level of significance is [tex]\alpha = 0.05[/tex]

Generally the population proportion is mathematically represented as

      [tex]p = \frac{3}{4} =0.75[/tex] (gotten from the statement  ''three out of four'' in the question)

The null hypothesis is [tex]H_o : p = 0.75[/tex]

The alternative hypothesis [tex]H_a : p > 0.75[/tex]

Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented as

     [tex]z = \frac{\^{p} - p}{ \sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n} } }[/tex]

=>    [tex]z = \frac{0.78- 0.75}{ \sqrt{\frac{ 0.75(1-0.75)}{214} } }[/tex]

=>  [tex]z = 1.01[/tex]

Generally the p-value is mathematically represented as

    [tex]p-value  = P(Z > z )[/tex]

=> [tex]p-value  = P(Z > 1.01 )[/tex]

From the z-table  

    [tex]P(Z > 1.01 ) = 0.15625[/tex]

So

    [tex]p-value  = 0.15625 [/tex]

From the obtained values we see that [tex]p-value > \alpha[/tex] hence we fail to reject the null hypothesis

 Therefore we can conclude that the sample evidence is  not  sufficient to conclude that more than three out of four financial institutions that offer online banking facilities are prone to fraud.

Answer:

1) P(1,0)Q(-2,3)R(-3,3)S(3,2)

2) (3,4)

3) (0,-4)

4) (1,2)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

2 3/5 inches in a year

Step-by-step explanation:

28 1/5 - 25 3/5 = 141/5 - 128/5 = 13/5 = 10/5 + 3/5 = 2 + 3/5 = 2 3/5

Answer:

y = 2

Step-by-step explanation:

....................

If a, b, and c are all positive integers and 6a + 9b + 20c = 61, then right away you know c < 3, because if c = 3, then 20c = 60, and there are no solutions for a and b.

So consider two cases:

• If c = 2, then we're left with 6a + 9b = 21.

• If c = 1, then 6a + 9b = 41.

We have gcd(6, 9) = 3, but 41 is prime and 3 does not divide 41. So we throw out the second case.

This leaves us with 6a + 9b = 21. Notice that if a = b = 1, then 6a + 9b = 15. Add 6 to both sides to get 21. So a = 2, b = 1, and c = 2, and hence a + b + c = 5.

Answer:

Three consecutive even integers are x, x+2, x+4.

Step-by-step explanation:

Their sum is x+x+2+x+4 = 3x+6.

Hope this helped! <3

Answer:

your answer is A

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Main difference between circle & ellipse

Step-by-step explanation:

Circle is a line forming a close loop, all points on the loop line are at equal distance from the centre, that distance is called Radius. Eg : Wheel

Ellipse is also a close loop line, such that distance of locus of all points on the plane to two fixed points (foci) always sum up to same constant. Eg : Orbits of planets

Cricle is the round shape entity in which it contains only radius and double of radius is diameter Thus below explanation is the answer to the Question

Explanation:

Thus we conclude that cricle is totally different from ellipse

To know more about cricle and ellipse

https://brainly.com/question/9689499

Answer:

SAS

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

A). g(x) = x² - 9x + 14

     Since coefficient of highest degree term (x²) is positive, parabola will open upwards.

    For any parabola opening upwards,

    Right end behavior,

    y → ∞ as x → ∞

B). Let the equation of the linear function is,

    f(x) = mx + b

    Where m = slope of the function

    b = y-intercept

    From the graph attached,

    Slope 'm' = [tex]\frac{\text{Rise}}{\text{Run}}=\frac{-(2+1)}{(0+1)}[/tex]

    m = -3

    b = -1

    Therefore, function 'f' will be,

    f(x) = (-3)x - 1

    f(x) = -3x - 1    

    g(x) = x² - 9x + 14

           = x² - 7x - 2x + 14

           = x(x - 7) - 2(x - 7)

           = (x - 2)(x - 7)

    If h(x) = f(x)g(x)

    h(x) = -(3x + 1)(x -2)(x - 7)

    For h(x) ≥ 0

    -(3x + 1)(x - 2)(x - 7) ≥ 0

     [tex]x\leq -\frac{1}{3}[/tex] Or 2 ≤ x ≤ 7

    Therefore, for 2 ≤ x ≤ 7, h(x) ≥ 0

C). If k(x) = [tex]\frac{h(x)}{(x-2)}[/tex]

    k(x) = [tex]\frac{-(3x+1)(x-2)(x-7)}{(x-2)}[/tex]

    k(x) = -(3x + 1)(x - 7)

    For k(x) = -56

    -(3x + 1)(x - 7) = -56

     3x² -20x - 7 = 56

     3x² - 20x - 63 = 0

     3x² - 27x + 7x - 63 = 0

     3x(x - 9) + 7(x - 9) = 0

     (3x + 7)(x - 9) = 0

     [tex]x=-\frac{7}{3},9[/tex]

Answer:

-16.7

Step-by-step explanation:

(2°F − 32) × 5/9 = -16.7°C

Answer:

4 of the conspiracy theories were true

Step-by-step explanation:

Percentages

Phil read a book with 16 conspiracy theories, 75% of which were false. It means that 25% of them were true.

25% of 16 is 25 * 16 / 100 =400 / 100 = 4

Thus, 4 of the conspiracy theories were true