Solve and show your work. Plz :)

Answer:

1

Step-by-step explanation:

Anything to the power of 0 is 1, so the answer is 1.

A. Noncolinear

ABE although they are in the same side, but they don't lie on the same line.

so its a noncolinear.

Answer:

ABE although they are in the same side, but they don't lie on the same line.

so its a noncolinear.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

A = x²+6x+8

Step-by-step explanation:

(x+4)(x+2)

x²+2x+4x+8

x²+6x+8

Answer:

i am sorry i don't know but i will try to find the answers as soon as possible i am sorry

To solve this problem, you have to know that the measure of all the angles of a triangle is equal to 180 degrees.

Let's add each angle together and set them equal to 180 degrees.

180 degrees = 3x + 2x + 1 + x + 5

Combine like terms

180 degrees = 6x + 6

Subtract 6 from both sides

174 degrees = 6x

Divide both sides by 6

29 = x

We know that angle A = 3x = 3(29) = 87 degrees.

Answer:

The answer is 15ab. You can just simply multiply the two given number

Answer:

x = 6

Step-by-step explanation:

2(4x - 3) = 3(x + 8)

1. Distribute the 2 and 3 into the parentheses.

2(4x) + 2(-3) = 3(x) + 3(8)

= 8x - 6 = 3x + 24

2. Subtract 3x from both sides.

8x - 3x - 6 = 3x - 3x + 24

= 5x - 6 = 24

3. Add 6 on both sides.

5x - 6 + 6 = 24 + 6

5x = 30

4. Divide by 5.

5x ÷ 5 = 30 ÷ 5

x = 6

Hope that helps.

Answer:

Let a be a rational number and b be an irrational number. b = c - a, which means that b is rational. ... Since an irrational number cannot equal a rational number.

Step-by-step explanation:

PLZ MARK BRAINLIEST

The answer is that an irrational number cannot equal a rational number.

Irrational numbers are all real numbers that are not rational numbers in mathematics. Irrational numbers, on the other hand, cannot be stated as the ratio of two integers.

Let a be a rational number and b be an irrational number. b = c - a, which means that b is rational. Since an irrational number cannot equal a rational number.

Therefore an answer is that an irrational number cannot equal a rational number.

To know more about irrational numbers follow

https://brainly.com/question/1300130

#SPJ2

Step-by-step explanation:

400,000x600x30/32+1

400,000x600=240,000,000x30=7,200,000,000/32=

225,000,000+1=225,000,001

Really? -_-

Answer:

Ratio [Pam to her brother] = 2:5

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

Pam saves every two dollar

Her brother saves fives dollar (For every two dollar)

Find:

Ratio [Pam saving and his brothers saving]

Computation:

It is given that if Pam saves $2 her brother saves $5

So,

Ratio [Pam to her brother] = 2/5

Ratio [Pam to her brother] = 2:5

Answer:

38 kids on each team about.

I am Not 100% sure but I hope this Helps!

So D.

Answer:

12

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

a

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

60

Step-by-step explanation:

asked google

Answer:

60

Step-by-step explanation:

5: 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70

12: 12 24 36 48 60 72 84

Answer:

The answer for this question is 1e+110

Answer:

It is a function.

Step-by-step explanation:

Functions are relations in which one domain value is assigned to exactly one range value. The x-value must not repeat in the relation set for it to be a function.

{(2,3), (4,3), (6,3), (5,9), (3,9)}

There are no repeating x-values given.

The relation should be a function.

Hope this helps.

Functions are relationships where a single domain value is allocated to a single range value precisely. For a relation set to be a function, the x-value cannot repeat.

The simplest definition of a set in mathematics is a grouping of unique items. Any collection of elements, such as a group of numbers, hours of the week, different kinds of automobiles, etc., might be considered a set.

A set's elements are all the items that make up the set.

As per the given data in the question,

{(2,3), (4,3), (6,3), (5,9), (3,9)}

Due to the absence of repeated x-values.

So,

The relationship need to be functional.

To know more about set:

https://brainly.com/question/8053622

#SPJ2

Answer:

8.36

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]-0.7-(-2.6+ -0.8) +7.1\\ (add inside the parenthesis)\\\\-0.7 - 3.4 + 7.1\\\\=8.36[/tex]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

?

Answer:

Its 24

Step-by-step explanation:

where is the number line

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

4x² - 57x + 206

Step-by-step explanation:

To evaluate (t ￮ s)(x), substitute x = s(x) into t(x) , that is

t(x - 7)

= 4(x - 7)² - (x - 7) + 3 ← expand (x - 7)² using FOIL

= 4(x² - 14x + 49) - x + 7 + 3

= 4x² - 56x + 196 - x + 10 ← collect like terms )

= 4x² - 57x + 206

Answer:

#1. 9

#2. -50

#3. -53

#4. 7

Answer:

B. X < -4

Step-by-step explanation:

-2x - 8 > 3x + 12

Subtract 3x from both sides

-5x -8 > 12

Add 8 both sides

-5x > 20

Divide -5 both sides

X < -4

Answer: x < -4

Step-by-step explanation:

Subtract 3x from both sides

-5x - 8 > 12

Add 8 to both sides

-5x > 20

Divide both sides by -5

x < -4

Answer:

6720[tex]in^{3}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

length x width x height

30 in x 16 in x 14 in = 6720[tex]in^{3}[/tex]

Answer:

because it doesn't pass the verticle line test

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

yes, you can get all right answers.

Answer:

yes i believe that you can get all the answers right

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

x = 4

Step-by-step explanation:

-16 = -5x + x   -->   Collect like terms   -->    -16 = -4x    -->

                   swap the sides of the equation   4x = -16   -->  

   Divide both sides of the equation by -4   -->      x =4