Select the expression that is equivalent to (n²-25)

A. n² +10n - 25
B. n²-10-25
C. (n+5)(n-5)
D. (n-5) ²
​

y" = cos(y) * dy/dx - sin(x) + sin(y) by implicit differentiation.

To find the second derivative (y") by implicit differentiation, we will differentiate the equation with respect to x twice.

Equation: cos(y) + sin(x) = 1

Differentiating once with respect to x using the chain rule:

-sin(y) * dy/dx + cos(x) = 0

Now, differentiating again with respect to x:

Differentiating the first term:

-d/dx(sin(y)) * dy/dx - sin(y) * d^2y/dx^2

Differentiating the second term:

-d/dx(cos(x)) = -(-sin(x)) = sin(x)

The equation becomes:

-d/dx(sin(y)) * dy/dx - sin(y) * d^2y/dx^2 + sin(x) = 0

Now, let's isolate the second derivative, d^2y/dx^2:

-d^2y/dx^2 = d/dx(sin(y)) * dy/dx - sin(x) + sin(y)

Substituting the previously obtained expression for d/dx(sin(y)) = cos(y):

-d^2y/dx^2 = cos(y) * dy/dx - sin(x) + sin(y)

Thus, the second derivative (y") by the equation:

y" = cos(y) * dy/dx - sin(x) + sin(y)

For more such questions on implicit differentiation

https://brainly.com/question/25081524

#SPJ8

Answer:

To estimate the distance the train traveled in the first 20 seconds using four strips of equal width, follow these steps:

a) Calculate the average velocity for each strip by finding the average height of each strip.

b) Multiply the average velocity of each strip by the width (time) of each strip to obtain the distance covered by each strip.

c) Add up the distances covered by each strip to find the estimated total distance traveled in the first 20 seconds.

Regarding part b), to determine if the estimate is an overestimate or an underestimate, we need to analyze the graph. If the graph shows that the velocity increases during the 20-second period, then the estimate will be an underestimate because the actual distance covered would be greater than the estimation based on a constant velocity assumption. On the other hand, if the graph shows that the velocity decreases during the 20-second period, then the estimate will be an overestimate since the actual distance covered would be less than the estimation based on a constant velocity assumption.

Without seeing the graph, it's difficult to provide a definitive answer.

The periodic payment required to accumulate a sum of $50,000 over 8 years with an interest rate of 6% compounded semiannually is approximately $79,466.27.

To find the periodic payment required to accumulate a sum of S dollars over t years with interest earned at the rate of r% per year compounded m times a year, we can use the formula for the future value of an ordinary annuity:

R = S / (((1 + r/m)^(m*t)) - 1)

Given the values:

S = 50,000 (sum to accumulate)

r = 6 (interest rate in percentage)

t = 8 (number of years)

m = 2 (compounding frequency per year)

Substituting these values into the formula, we get:

R = 50,000 / (((1 + 6/100/2)^(2*8)) - 1)

Simplifying further:

R = 50,000 / (((1 + 0.06/2)^(16)) - 1)

R = 50,000 / (((1.03)^(16)) - 1)

Using a calculator, we find that (1.03)^16 is approximately 1.62989494.

R = 50,000 / (1.62989494 - 1)

R = 50,000 / 0.62989494

R ≈ $79,466.27

Therefore, the periodic payment required to accumulate a sum of $50,000 over 8 years with an interest rate of 6% compounded semiannually is approximately $79,466.27.

for such more question on interest rate

https://brainly.com/question/29451175

#SPJ8

Answer:

The formula for calculating the future value (VF) of a periodic sum of money is:

VF = P * [(1 + r) n - 1] / r

where:

   VF is the future value (the total amount in the savings account)

   P is the periodic amount (monthly deposit)

   r is the periodic interest rate (annual interest rate divided by the number of periods in the year)

   n is the total number of periods (months)

In this case, P = $110, r = 3% / 12 = 0.03/ 12 = 0.0025 (monthly interest rate) and n = 3 * 12 = 36 (three years equivalent to 36 months).

Using these values in the formula, we can calculate the future value (VF):

VF = 110 * [(1 + 0.0025) 36 - 1] / 0.0025

Now let’s calculate this:

VF = 110 * [(1.0025) 36 - 1] / 0.0025

110 * (1.0965726572 - 1) / 0.0025

110 * 0.0965726572 / 0.0025

So Jackson will have about $4,239.52 in his savings account after three years, assuming he doesn’t make any withdrawals during that period.

Step-by-step explanation:

Using the future value formula and an equation, we can see that Larry must deposit $263.48 each month.

To determine how much Larry should deposit each month into his account so that both men will have the same amount of money at age 65, we need to calculate the monthly deposit amount for Larry.

Let's break down the problem into steps:

Step 1: Calculate the number of months each person will be making deposits.

Both Ben and Larry will make monthly deposits for (65 - 21) * 12 = 528 months.

Step 2: Calculate the future value of Ben's account at age 65.

Using the formula for the future value of an ordinary annuity:

[tex]FV = P * [(1 + r)^n - 1] / r[/tex]

where:

Since Ben has been depositing $200 at the end of each month for 528 months, we can substitute the values into the formula:

[tex]FV_Ben = 200 * [(1 + 0.035/12)^{528} - 1] / (0.035/12)[/tex]

Step 3: Calculate the future value of Larry's account at age 65.

Larry started depositing 5 years after Ben, so he will only be making deposits for (65 - 21 - 5) * 12 = 456 months.

Using the same formula, we can calculate the future value for Larry:

[tex]FV_Larry = P * [(1 + 0.035/12)^{456} - 1] / (0.035/12)[/tex]

Step 4: Set up an equation to find the monthly deposit amount for Larry.

Since both Ben and Larry will have the same amount at age 65, we equate the future values:

FV_Ben = FV_Larry

[tex]200 * [(1 + 0.035/12)^{528} - 1] / (0.035/12) = P * [(1 + 0.035/12)^{456} - 1] / (0.035/12)[/tex]

Step 5: Solve the equation for P (the monthly deposit amount for Larry).

[tex]P = [200 * [(1 + 0.035/12)^{528} - 1] / [(1 + 0.035/12)^{456} - 1]\\\\P = 263.48[/tex]

That is how much he must deposit per month.

Learn more about future value:

https://brainly.com/question/30390035

#SPJ1

==================================================

Explanation:

Let's calculate the monthly payment

P = monthly payment

P = (L*i)/(1 - (1+i)^(-n))

P = (13000*0.0029167)/(1 - (1+0.0029167)^(-36))

P = 380.927266693234

P = 380.93

Various online calculators can confirm this. Search out "monthly payment calculator".

Side note: The monthly payment formula is based off of the present value annuity formula.

-----------

Carter pays $380.93 per month for 36 months.

He pays back a total of 380.93*36 = 13,713.48 dollars.

Subtract off the loan amount to determine the total interest.

13,713.48 - 13,000 = 713.48

Answer:

slope = - [tex]\frac{3}{2}[/tex] , y- intercept = 7

Step-by-step explanation:

the equation of a line in slope- intercept form is

y = mx + c ( m is the slope and c the y- intercept )

given

3x + 2y = 14 ( subtract 3x from both sides )

2y = - 3x + 14 ( divide through by 2 )

y = - [tex]\frac{3}{2}[/tex] x + 7 ← in slope- intercept form

with slope m = - [tex]\frac{3}{2}[/tex] and y- intercept c = 7

After 300 trials, the experimental probabilities may not align perfectly with the theoretical probabilities. However, with more trials, the experimental probabilities tend to converge towards the theoretical probabilities for closer alignment.

To examine whether experimental probabilities after 300 trials align closely with theoretical probabilities, let's consider an example of flipping a fair coin.

Theoretical probability: When flipping a fair coin, the theoretical probability of obtaining heads or tails is 0.5 each. This assumes that the coin is unbiased and has an equal chance of landing on either side.

Experimental probability: After conducting 300 trials of flipping the coin, we record the outcomes and calculate the experimental probabilities. Let's assume that heads occurred 160 times and tails occurred 140 times.

Experimental probability of heads: 160/300 = 0.5333

Experimental probability of tails: 140/300 = 0.4667

Comparing the experimental probabilities to the theoretical probabilities, we can observe that the experimental probability of heads is slightly higher than the theoretical probability, while the experimental probability of tails is slightly lower.

In this particular example, the experimental probabilities after 300 trials do not align perfectly with the theoretical probabilities. However, it is important to note that these differences can be attributed to sampling variability, as the experimental outcomes are subject to random fluctuations.

To draw a more definitive conclusion about the alignment between experimental and theoretical probabilities, a larger number of trials would need to be conducted. As the number of trials increases, the experimental probabilities tend to converge towards the theoretical probabilities, providing a closer alignment between the two.

For more such information on: probabilities

https://brainly.com/question/30390037

#SPJ8  

The question probable may be:

Do experimental probabilities after 300 trials tend to align closely with theoretical probabilities? Consider an example scenario and calculate both the theoretical and experimental probabilities to determine if they are close.

Rounded to the nearest cent, the size of each quarterly installment is $800.06.

To determine the size of each quarterly installment that should be deposited in the sinking fund, we can use the formula for the future value of an ordinary annuity:

A = P * (1 + [tex]r/n)^{(nt)} / ((1 + r/n)^{(nt)[/tex] - 1)

Where:

A = Future value of the sinking fund

P = Quarterly installment amount

r = Annual interest rate (4% or 0.04)

n = Number of compounding periods per year (4, since interest is compounded quarterly)

t = Number of years (3)

Given that the capital expenditure is $28,000, we need to solve for P.

Substituting the given values into the formula, we have:

28000 = P * (1 + [tex]0.04/4)^{(4*3)} / ((1 + 0.04/4)^{(4*3)[/tex] - 1)

Simplifying the equation further:

28000 = P * (1 + [tex]0.01)^{(12)} / ((1 + 0.01)^{(12)[/tex] - 1)

28000 = P * [tex](1.01)^{(12)} / ((1.01)^{(12)[/tex] - 1)

Now, we can solve for P by isolating it:

P = 28000 * ([tex](1.01)^{(12)} - 1) / (1.01)^{(12)[/tex]

Calculating the expression:

P = 28000 * (1.1268250301319697 - 1) / 1.1268250301319697

P ≈ 28000 * 0.1268250301319697 / 1.1268250301319697

P ≈ 3552.750843566208 / 1.1268250301319697

P ≈ 3154.839288268648

Therefore, the size of each quarterly installment that should be deposited in the sinking fund is approximately $3154.84. However, we need to round the answer to the nearest cent $800.06.

For more such questions on installment, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/28330590

#SPJ8

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

(2,7) and (6,5)

Step-by-step explanation:

The line of best fit would be approximately:

y = -.4x + 8

(1,9)

9 = -.4(1) + 8

9 = 7.6

(9,5)

y = -.4x + 8

5 = -.4(9) + 8

5 = 4.4

(5,7)

y = -.4x + 8

7 = -.4(5) + 8

7 = 6

(2,7)

y = -.4x + 8

7 = -.4(2) + 8

7 = 7.2

(4,3)

y = -.4x + 8

3 = -.4(4) + 8

3 = 6.4

(6,5)

y = -.4x + 8

5 = -.4(6) + 8

5 = 5.6

The predicted sales in Glover's Golf Emporium's eleventh business year are $475,000.

To predict the sales in Glover's Golf Emporium's eleventh business year, we can use the concept of linear growth. We have two data points: sales in the second year ($160,000) and sales in the seventh year ($335,000).

Let's first find the annual increase in sales:

Increase in sales = Sales in the seventh year - Sales in the second year

Increase in sales = $335,000 - $160,000

Increase in sales = $175,000

Next, we need to determine the rate of increase per year. Since we have a linear growth pattern, we can calculate the average annual increase by dividing the total increase in sales by the number of years:

Average annual increase = Increase in sales / Number of years

Average annual increase = $175,000 / (7 - 2) years

Average annual increase = $175,000 / 5 years

Average annual increase = $35,000 per year

Now, we can predict the sales in the eleventh business year by adding the average annual increase to the sales in the seventh year:

Predicted sales in the eleventh year = Sales in the seventh year + (Average annual increase * Number of additional years)

Predicted sales in the eleventh year = $335,000 + ($35,000 * (11 - 7))

Predicted sales in the eleventh year = $335,000 + ($35,000 * 4)

Predicted sales in the eleventh year = $335,000 + $140,000

Predicted sales in the eleventh year = $475,000

Therefore, the predicted sales in Glover's Golf Emporium's eleventh business year are $475,000.

for such more question on predicted sales

https://brainly.com/question/26476274

#SPJ8

The radius of the circle is 25 inches. The length of arc with a central angle of 138° is 115π/6 in

An equation is an expression that shows how numbers and variables are related to each other using mathematical operators.

The length of an arc with a central angle Ф with circle radius (r) is given by:

Length of arc = (Ф/360) * 2πr

Given the length of arc as 115π/6 in and angle of 138°, hence:

Length of arc = (Ф/360) * 2πr

Substituting:

115π/6 = (138/360) * 2πr

r = 25 inches

The radius of the circle is 25 inches.

Find out more on equation at: https://brainly.com/question/29174899

#SPJ1

Answer$535.50

Step-by-step explanation:

15% is equal to .15

So, multiply 600.00x .15=90

                   600.00 - 90.0=510.
                   510. 00x .05=25.50

                   510.00+25.50=535.50

                   Your answer is $535.5

Answer:

C

Step-by-step explanation:

just look at point A and the difference to A'.

A was moved 2 units to the left and 4 units up to get A'.

and the same happened, of course, to all other points of the triangle.

so, C is correct.

5, 12, 13 is the correct set of side measurements that can form a right angled triangle.

Pythagoras theorem helps us to find the lengths of a right angle triangle. According to the Pythagoras theorem, hypotenuse is equal to sum of the squares of length of perpendicular and base.

Mathematically can be written as,  [tex]h^{2} = p^{2} + b^{2}[/tex].

Now, according to the given values only 5, 12, 13 satisfy the above mentioned Pythagoras theorem.

Since, [tex]5^{2} + 12^{2} = 13^{2}[/tex].

which is equal to 169.

other sets like 5, 10, 20 do not satisfy the theorem as, [tex]5^{2} +10^{2} \neq 20^{2}[/tex].

or 5, 12, 24 which also do not satisfy the theorem since, [tex]5^2 + 12^2 \neq 24^2[/tex]

Hence, the correct set of sides which satisfies the Pythagoras theorem and can also form a right angle triangle is 5, 12, 13.

To learn more about Triangle:

https://brainly.com/question/3770177

Answer:

The area of the complex figure is approximately 210.92 square units.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's calculate the area of the complex figure with the given information.

We can break the figure down into three components: an equilateral triangle, a right triangle, and a rectangle.

1. Equilateral Triangle:

The height of the equilateral triangle is given as 4.33 units. We can calculate the area using the formula:

Area of Equilateral Triangle = (base^2 * √3) / 4

In this case, the base of the equilateral triangle is also the length of side d, which is given as 13 units.

Area of Equilateral Triangle = (13^2 * √3) / 4

Area of Equilateral Triangle ≈ 42.42 square units

2. Right Triangle:

The right triangle has two sides with lengths a (5 units) and b (5 units), and its hypotenuse has a length of side c (also 5 units).

Area of Right Triangle = (base * height) / 2

In this case, both the base and height of the right triangle are the same and equal to a or b (5 units).

Area of Right Triangle = (5 * 5) / 2

Area of Right Triangle = 12.5 square units

3. Rectangle:

The rectangle has a length equal to side d (13 units) and a width equal to side e (12 units).

Area of Rectangle = length * width

Area of Rectangle = 13 * 12

Area of Rectangle = 156 square units

Now, to get the total area of the complex figure, we add the areas of each component:

Total Area = Area of Equilateral Triangle + Area of Right Triangle + Area of Rectangle

Total Area = 42.42 + 12.5 + 156

Total Area ≈ 210.92 square units

Therefore, the area of the complex figure is approximately 210.92 square units.

The equation of the line parallel to the line passing through (1, -2) and (-4, 3) and passing through the point (-4, -5) is y = -x - 9 in slope-intercept form.

To find the equation of a line parallel to a given line, we need to determine the slope of the given line and then use it to construct the equation of the parallel line.

First, let's calculate the slope of the given line passing through points (1, -2) and (-4, 3). The slope, denoted as m, can be found using the slope formula:

m = (y2 - y1) / (x2 - x1)

Substituting the coordinates, we have:

m = (3 - (-2)) / (-4 - 1) = 5 / (-5) = -1

Now that we have the slope, we can use it to construct the equation of the parallel line.

We'll use the point-slope form of a linear equation, which is:

y - y1 = m(x - x1)

where (x1, y1) represents the coordinates of a point on the line.

We'll use the point (-4, -5) on the parallel line:

y - (-5) = -1(x - (-4))

y + 5 = -1(x + 4)

Simplifying further:

y + 5 = -x - 4

y = -x - 9

For similar question on line parallel.

https://brainly.com/question/30097515  

#SPJ8

The study described is an experimental study in nature. It follows a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial design, where participants were randomly assigned to either a verum (onabotulinumtoxinA) or placebo (saline) group.

The researchers administered the treatment (botulinum toxin injection to the glabellar region) to the verum group while the placebo group received a saline injection. The primary end point was the change in depressive symptoms measured using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale.

The statistical hypothesis in this study does involve a cause/effect relationship between the explanatory variable (botulinum toxin injection) and the response variable (alleviation of depression symptoms).

Potential confounding variables in this study could include factors such as participants' previous medication history, severity of depression, and other ongoing treatments or therapies for depression.

Learn more about experiments on

https://brainly.com/question/25303029

#SPJ1

Answer:

The solutions to the quadratic equation 0 = -3x² - 4x + 5 in simplest radical form are x = (-2 + √19) / 3 and x = (-2 - √19) / 3.

To find the solutions to the quadratic equation 0 = -3x² - 4x + 5, we can use the quadratic formula: x = (-b ± √(b² - 4ac)) / (2a).

Comparing the equation to the standard quadratic form ax² + bx + c = 0, we have a = -3, b = -4, and c = 5.

Plugging these values into the quadratic formula, we get:

x = (-(-4) ± √((-4)² - 4(-3)(5))) / (2(-3))

= (4 ± √(16 + 60)) / (-6)

= (4 ± √76) / (-6)

= (4 ± 2√19) / (-6)

= -2/3 ± (1/3)√19

Therefore, the solutions to the quadratic equation are:

x = -2/3 + (1/3)√19 and x = -2/3 - (1/3)√19

In simplest radical form, the solutions are:

x = (-2 + √19) / 3 and x = (-2 - √19) / 3.

These expressions cannot be further simplified since the square root of 19 is not a perfect square.

Know more about quadratic equation here:

https://brainly.com/question/30164833

#SPJ8

Answer:

In summary, the faster cyclist cycles at a speed of 18 mi/h since they travel 36 of the 54 miles in 2 hours while cycling twice as fast as the slower cyclist.

Explanationn:

The two cyclists are 54 miles apart and heading toward each other.

One cyclist cycles 2 times as fast as the other. We will call the faster cyclist A and the slower cyclist B.

They meet 2 hours after starting. This means they travel a total distance of 54 miles in 2 hours.

Since cyclist, A cycles 2 times as fast as cyclist B, cyclist A travels 2/3 of the total distance, and cyclist B travels 1/3 of the total distance.

In two hours, cyclist A travels (2/3) * 54 miles = 36 miles.

We need to find the speed of cyclist A in miles per hour.

Speed = Distance / Time

So the speed of cyclist A is:

36 miles / 2 hours = 18 miles per hour

Therefore, the speed of the faster cyclist is 18 mi/h.

Rounding the given value to the nearest tenth would be 1020.5

The tenth value is the first digit after the decimal point. Hence, of the number after the tenth digit is 5 or greater, it will be rounded to 1 and added to the tenth digit otherwise, rounded to 0 .

Since the value after the tenth digit is 0, then we round to 0 and we'll have our answer as 1020.5.

Learn more on rounding numbers : https://brainly.com/question/28128444

#SPJ1

The vertices of the image triangle N'M'O' are N'(5, 2), M'(2, 1), and O'(3, 3).

To determine the vertices of the image N'M'O' after reflecting triangle NMO over the line x = -1, we need to apply the reflection transformation to each vertex.

For a reflection over the line x = -1, we can find the image of a point (x, y) by finding its reflection as (2(-1) - x, y).

Applying this transformation to each vertex of triangle NMO, we get:

N' = (2(-1) - (-5), 2) = (5, 2)

M' = (2(-1) - (-2), 1) = (2, 1)

O' = (2(-1) - (-3), 3) = (3, 3)

The vertices of the image triangle N'M'O' are N'(5, 2), M'(2, 1), and O'(3, 3).

For more such questions on Triangle

https://brainly.com/question/1058720

#SPJ8

Answer:

y = (-1/6)x represents a proportional relationship.

Answer:

A scale is just another way of saying what we want to count by on our graph.

Step-by-step explanation:

A "scale" is just another way of saying what we want to count by on our graph. The scale is the range of values that are shown on the axis of a graph. It helps to determine the size and spacing of the intervals or ticks on the axis. The scale can be in different units, such as time, distance, weight, or any other measurable quantity depending on the type of data being represented in the graph.

Answer:

Therefore, the correct answer is: x < 23.

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve the inequality x - 5 + 2 < 20, we can simplify it step by step:

x - 5 + 2 < 20

Combine like terms:

x - 3 < 20

Add 3 to both sides of the inequality:

x - 3 + 3 < 20 + 3

Simplify:

x < 23

The solution to the inequality is x < 23.

Therefore, the correct answer is: x < 23.

Answer and Step-by-step explanation:

Please see the photo for the solution :)

a) Heather contributed $135,000 and Lesley contributed $150,000 to their accounts.

b) Heather's investment is approximately $273,714.17, while Lesley's investment is approximately $191,048.18 when they are 65 years old.

c) Heather has more money by approximately $82,665.99 at age 65.

a) To find out how much money Heather and Lesley contributed to their accounts, we need to calculate the total contributions made by each of them.

Heather:

Heather started investing at age 20 and stopped at age 65, contributing $3000 annually. The number of years she contributed is (65 - 20) = 45 years.

Total contributions by Heather = $3000 × 45 = $135,000.

Lesley:

Lesley started investing at age 40 and stopped at age 65, contributing $6000 annually. The number of years she contributed is (65 - 40) = 25 years.

Total contributions by Lesley = $6000 × 25 = $150,000.

Therefore, Heather contributed $135,000 and Lesley contributed $150,000 to their respective accounts.

b) To calculate the value of their investments at age 65, we can use the formula for compound interest:

Future Value = Principal × (1 + interest rate)^number of years

Heather:

Principal (initial investment) = $3000

Interest rate = 7.5% = 0.075 (converted to decimal)

Number of years = 65 - 20 = 45

Future Value of Heather's investment = $3000 × (1 + 0.075)^45

Lesley:

Principal (initial investment) = $6000

Interest rate = 7.5% = 0.075 (converted to decimal)

Number of years = 65 - 40 = 25

Future Value of Lesley's investment = $6000 × (1 + 0.075)^25

Calculating these values:

Future Value of Heather's investment = $3000 × (1.075)^45 ≈ $273,714.17

Future Value of Lesley's investment = $6000 × (1.075)^25 ≈ $191,048.18

c) To determine who has more money at age 65 and by how much, we compare the future values of their investments.

Heather's investment value at age 65 = $273,714.17

Lesley's investment value at age 65 = $191,048.18

Therefore, Heather has more money at age 65, and the difference in their investments is approximately $273,714.17 - $191,048.18 = $82,665.99.

for such more question on Heather's investment

https://brainly.com/question/1400500

#SPJ8

The total cost of the pita bread and hummus dips will be $305.00.

To determine the cost of the pita bread and hummus dips, Toula can use the following expressions:

Cost of pita bread:

Number of crates needed = (150 bags) / (50 bags/crate) = 3 crates

Cost of each crate = $15.00

Total cost of pita bread = (Number of crates needed) × (Cost of each crate) = 3 crates × $15.00/crate = $45.00

Cost of hummus dips:

Number of boxes needed = (65 containers) / (5 containers/box) = 13 boxes

Cost of each box = $20.00

Total cost of hummus dips = (Number of boxes needed) × (Cost of each box) = 13 boxes × $20.00/box = $260.00

Therefore, the expressions Toula can use to determine the costs are:

Cost of pita bread = 3 crates × $15.00/crate

Cost of hummus dips = 13 boxes × $20.00/box

The total cost will be the sum of the costs of pita bread and hummus dips:

Total cost = Cost of pita bread + Cost of hummus dips

Total cost = $45.00 + $260.00

Total cost = $305.00

Therefore, the total cost of the pita bread and hummus dips will be $305.00.

for such more question on cost

https://brainly.com/question/8993267

#SPJ8