Reread paragraph 6. What can you infer about Keller's understanding of sight?
(b) Explain what the text says explicitly.
Reread paragraph 9. What does this paragraph reveal about Keller's sighted friends' opinion of the Empire State Building? Use details from the text to support your answer.
RI.O-10.6 Determine an author's point of view or purpose in a text and analuze how an author uses rhetoric to advance that point of view or purpose.
2. Determine an author's point of view.
Reread paragraphs 10-12. What is Keller's point of view about the Empire State Building?
Support your answer with details from the text.
All information is proprietary in nature.

Answer:

You may use a semicolon to connect two independent clauses that are closely related in thought, but not closely related enough to be in the same sentence. For example: "I have a big presentation tomorrow; I need to get some rest."

Explanation:

You should use a semicolon to join two independent clauses that are closely related in meaning and could stand alone as separate sentences but are related in meaning. The semicolon indicates a stronger connection between the two clauses than a period would, but a weaker connection than a conjunction like "and" or "but."

For example: "I have a big exam tomorrow; I need to study tonight."

In this example, each clause could stand alone as a separate sentence, but they are closely related in meaning and the semicolon indicates a stronger connection between the two clauses than a period would.

You can also use a semicolon to separate items in a list if the items themselves contain commas. This is called a complex list.

For example: "I have lived in Durham, North Carolina; Austin, Texas; and San Francisco, California."

In this example, the semicolons separate the items in the complex list, which contain commas themselves.

It's important to use semicolons sparingly and appropriately, as overuse can make your writing seem disjointed or pretentious.

In the given sentence, the phrase "look over" is the underlined segment. This phrase is incorrect because it does not convey the intended meaning.

The correct answer option that identifies the error is "look over."

The phrase "look over" means to quickly review or examine something. However, in the context of studying for an English test, it would be more appropriate to use the phrase "go over" instead. "Go over" means to thoroughly review or study something.

Therefore, the corrected sentence would be: "Daniel suggested that we come up with a better way to study for our English test, so we decided to look up all the new vocabulary words in a dictionary and then go over the definitions."

By using "go over" instead of "look over," the sentence now conveys the idea of thoroughly reviewing the definitions of the new vocabulary words. This would be more effective in studying for an English test, as it emphasizes a deeper understanding of the material.

Know more about vocabulary here :

brainly.com/question/1587636

#SPJ8

Answer:

The sentence "Jacob said, 'Have you read this book?'" is an example of direct speech. It is a complete sentence that consists of two parts: the reporting clause (Jacob said) and the reported clause (Have you read this book?).

In direct speech, the exact words spoken by a person are quoted and enclosed in quotation marks. In this case, the exact words spoken by Jacob are "Have you read this book?", and they are enclosed in quotation marks.

Direct speech is commonly used in writing to convey the exact words spoken by a person, and it is usually introduced with a reporting verb or phrase such as "said," "asked," or "inquired."

The sentence "Bob resents eating junk food" indicates that Bob has negative feelings or emotions toward consuming junk food. Therefore, the appropriate word to complete the sentence is "hates."

Resenting something means feeling bitterness, anger, or frustration toward it. In this case, Bob experiences these negative emotions towards eating junk food. The use of the word "resents" implies that Bob has a strong aversion or dislike towards this type of food.

While it is possible for someone to enjoy, love, or admit to eating junk food, these options do not accurately reflect the negative sentiment expressed in the sentence. Enjoying or loving junk food would indicate a positive or pleasurable association with it, which contradicts the notion of resentment. Similarly, admitting to eating junk food does not necessarily capture the negative emotions associated with it.

By using the word "resents," the sentence conveys Bob's disapproval or dissatisfaction with consuming unhealthy food choices. It suggests that Bob may have concerns about the impact of junk food on his health, well-being, or personal goals.

In conclusion, the word that best completes the sentence "Bob resents eating junk food" is "hates," as it accurately reflects the negative emotions and aversion towards consuming unhealthy food.

Know more about junk food here:
https://brainly.com/question/4136688

#SPJ8

Answer:

number 3

Explanation:

because it has the correct use of commas and correct use of words.

Final answer:

The correct sentence is 'If you were to fall, the harness would catch you.' as it uses the correct punctuation and grammar. It separates the two independent clauses with a comma which is essential in English for clarity and understanding.

Explanation:

The correct sentence that has no punctuation, spelling, or grammar mistakes is, 'If you were to fall, the harness would catch you.'. In this sentence, the use of the comma after 'fall' correctly separates the two independent clauses, making it grammatically correct.

The importance of using correct punctuation in English cannot be overstated. It provides the necessary pauses, separations, and emphasis that sentences require to be correctly and easily understood. In the first option, a comma is required after the word 'fall' to correctly separate two independent clauses. The second option overuses commas, placing them where they are not necessary. The last option uses the incorrect form of the verb 'be', it should be 'were' instead of 'was'.

Learn more about Punctuation here:

https://brainly.com/question/35492880

#SPJ2