Answer:
1. by listing each of the king’s crimes in a unique sentence to emphasize how he has abused his power
2.to defend the decision to separate from British rule
to emphasize the cruelty and oppression of the king’s rule
3.The actions of King George have made it necessary for America to reject British rule.
4.He believes America’s only recourse is to declare war on the British.
5.“What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly: It is dearness only that gives every thing its value.”
“Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph.”
6. He has no interest in political power.
7. No- After being away for so long, Washington longs to return home.
No – Fame and fortune motivate Washington to seek the presidency.
Yes- Washington’s strength and humility are unrivaled.
Yes – America has earned its freedom, thanks to Washington
Yes – Washington has made America a model for liberty around the world.
8. It emphasizes the author’s reverence for Washington.
9. The poems assert that Washington will inspire other nations to seek freedom.
“On other worlds he lights his fires: / Cold climes beneath his influence glow, / And frozen rivers learn to flow.”
“Fix'd are the eyes of nations on the scales, / For in their hopes Columbia's arm prevails.”
Explanation:
Answer:
c
Explanation:
i took it
How did the Thirty Years War influence the development of the identiities of Europe?
Answer:
- It increased Spain's power over the rest of Europe.
- It wiped out most of Europe's Protestant population.
- It led kingdoms to establish clear boundaries.
- It turned most of Europe against the Catholic Church.
Please correct me if i am wrong
Need help!
Envision that you have the opportunity to talk to James Madison, who was one of the main writers of the US Constitution. Based on what you learned about the articles of the Constitution, what questions would you have for him and why?
Under the new economic policy of 1921 what happened to the surplus of crops in Russian agriculture
Russia's agricultural output had returned to pre-World War I levels by the middle of the 1920s. Russia had produced almost 80 million tonnes of grain by 1913. This had decreased to less than 50 million tonnes by 1921.
What was accomplished by the 1921 New Economic Policy?The Soviet people were able to recover from years of war, civil conflict, and poor governance thanks to the New Economic Policy, which restored some economic stability. NEP guys were the small company owners and managers who prospered at this time.
What led to Russia's New Economic Policy?In an effort to revitalise the Russian economy, the Bolsheviks created the New Economic Policy (NEP) The Bolsheviks' attempt to rebuild the Russian economy following years of War Communism was known as Economic Policy (NEP). In order to ensure that the Red Army had adequate food and resources to win the civil war, war communism served as the country's economic policy from 1918 to 1921.
To know more about World War visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/1449762
#SPJ1
Of the changes mentioned in this activity,(History of Ohios Constitution by iCivics, Primary Source Activity side B) which do you think had the greatest impact on how the Ohio government functions and serves the people? Explain your answer thoroughly.
From the History of Ohio's Constitution by iCivics, several changes have been discussed that have impacted how the Ohio government functions and serves the people. Among these changes, I believe that the adoption of the Constitution had the greatest impact.
The 1851 Ohio ConstitutionThe 1851 Ohio Constitution was a significant change from the previous 1802 Constitution. It established a more modern government structure, including the separation of powers among three branches of government, which was modeled after the federal government. This new structure provided a system of checks and balances, where each branch could check the power of the others, preventing any one branch from becoming too powerful.
Another major change introduced by the 1851 Ohio Constitution was the expansion of the right to vote. Previously, only white men who owned property could vote, but the new constitution expanded voting rights to all white men, regardless of property ownership. This change paved the way for later expansions of voting rights, including the right to vote for women and people of color.
The 1851 Ohio Constitution included a provision for a constitutional convention to be held every 20 years. This provision allowed for the Ohio Constitution to be updated to reflect changing times and societal values.
Learn more about constitutions here https://brainly.com/question/24638264
#SPJ1
Can. someone tell me the weaknesses of Elizabeth Cady Stanton's argument in the Declaration of Sentiments?
Answer: One possible weakness of Elizabeth Cady Stanton's argument in the Declaration of Sentiments is that it relies heavily on Enlightenment and republican ideals of natural rights, liberty, and equality, which were not universally accepted or applied in her time. For example, the idea of women's suffrage challenged the traditional gender roles and power structures of her era, which were based on patriarchal and hierarchical norms. Some critics might have argued that women were not qualified or responsible enough to participate in politics, or that their interests were already represented by their husbands or fathers.
Another weakness of Stanton's argument could be that it conflates the experiences and aspirations of white, middle-class women with those of all women, ignoring the diversity and complexity of their social, economic, and cultural backgrounds. For instance, women of color, immigrants, and working-class women faced additional barriers and prejudices that were not fully acknowledged or addressed by Stanton and her colleagues. Some critics might have accused her of being elitist, racist, or ethnocentric in her approach to women's rights.
Finally, Stanton's argument might have been criticized for being too radical or utopian, in that it demanded a complete overhaul of the legal and social systems that had been in place for centuries. Some opponents might have argued that such a drastic change would lead to chaos, instability, and moral decay, and that gradual reforms and compromises were more realistic and effective. Others might have accused her of being unpatriotic or anti-Christian, since she challenged the traditional values and institutions that were seen as essential to American identity and morality.
Enjoy and don't become discouraged by the trolls (:
Why did the Articles of Confederation lead to a weak central government?
The Articles of Confederation created a weak central government because they intentionally limited the powers of the federal government. The Articles established a "firm league of friendship" among the states, but it did not provide for a strong executive branch or a judiciary branch to enforce laws. The government under the Articles consisted of only a single legislative body, the Congress, which had limited authority to raise revenue, regulate trade, and make laws. Additionally, the Articles required unanimous consent from all 13 states to make changes to the document, making it difficult to pass any significant legislation or amendments.
The lack of a strong central government made it difficult to address important issues facing the nation, such as economic instability, interstate commerce disputes, and foreign relations. The government could not regulate trade or impose taxes, which led to economic chaos and trade disputes among the states. The states were also unable to provide a united front in negotiations with foreign countries, leaving them vulnerable to exploitation. These weaknesses eventually led to the drafting of the United States Constitution, which established a stronger federal government with more robust powers to address the challenges facing the new nation.
Brainliest appreciated (:
Explanation:
The Articles of Confederation led to a weak central government since it gave most of the power to the states, rather than to the federal government.
The federal government had limited authority to regulate trade, collect taxes, and enforce laws. There was no executive branch to enforce laws or a judiciary branch to interpret them. The federal government was unable to properly govern the country, and it was difficult for the states to work together on issues of national importance.
At the beginning of the French Revolution, what kind of government were the people rising against?
Answer: Constitutional monarchy (July 1789 – September 1792)
Explanation: The French Revolution became far more radical than the American Revolution. In addition to a period of extreme public violence, which became known as the Reign of Terror, the French Revolution also attempted to enhance the rights and power of poor people and women.
Before the Revolution
France was a monarchy ruled by the king. The king had total power over the government and the people. The people of France were divided into three social classes called "estates." The First Estate was the clergy, the Second Estate was the nobles, and the Third Estate was the commoners.
Helpp plsss everyone fast i need help
Lincoln reminded his audience that the United States was founded on the values of liberty and equality by using language from the Declaration of Independence.
What was the relationship between the Declaration of Independence and the Gettysburg Address?He recognized a connection between the Civil War sacrifices and the desire for "a fresh birth of freedom" in it, as well as the critical necessity to maintain the Union established in 1776 and its objective of self-government. He also referred to the Declaration of Independence's goals of human equality.
Both the Declaration of Independence and the Gettysburg Address serve as symbols of both the times and the authors who penned them. They serve as a metaphor for the challenges the country was facing at the time and the individuals, Jefferson and Lincoln, who accepted those challenges and came up with solutions on their own.
How does the Gettysburg Address' message vary from that of the Declaration of Independence?All men are created equal is the line that Lincoln takes from the Declaration of Independence. The statement "Let Facts be revealed to a candid world" is also included in the Declaration of Independence, but Lincoln omitted it from his Gettysburg Address.
The Gettysburg Address had a more int-imate tone because Lincoln wanted to inspire the populace. By mentioning the gallant troops who took part in the recent combat, Lincoln creates a personal tone. While the Declaration of Independence was written in a formal tone as a political document, the former.
Learn more about the Gettysburg Address: https://brainly.com/question/8178070
#SPJ1
Which of the following is NOT an example of Huck's maturity in The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn?
He steals Aunt Sally's things to help rescue Jim.
He feels bad for the Duke and King when they are tarred and feathered.
He feels guilty when Aunt Sally is worried about Tom.
He tells the truth to Mary Jane.
"He steals Aunt Sally's things to help rescue Jim,"
The first option, "He steals Aunt Sally's things to help rescue Jim," does NOT reflect Huck's development as a person in The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. Huck still has a ways to go before he learns the difference between right and wrong and respects the property of others, as evidenced by his choice to take Aunt Sally's possessions. The remaining choices all highlight Huck's developing maturity throughout the book.
What was the Iran-Contra Affair?
A. Bush was found to have invaded Grenada without any cause
B. Bush was caught wiretapping Iranian citizen phones
C. Reagan was caught secretly selling weapons to Iran
D. Reagan had funded pro-Cuban terrorists in Nicaragua
Answer:
The answer is C. Reagan was caught secretly selling weapons to Iran
BRAINLEST ANSWER PLS HELP!!!
How did the United States' entry into World War I change the culture and international
political policies of the country?
Answer:
v
Explanation:
World War I marked a turning point in world and U.S. history that is far too little understood today. The United States’ formal declaration of war and entry into the Great War in April 1917 represented a seismic shift for the nation, which to that point, had attemped to avoid larger scale entanglements in European power politics and conflicts.
Answer: The entry of the United States into World War I had a profound impact on the culture and international political policies of the country. On the cultural front, the war led to a surge in patriotism and national pride, as Americans rallied around their country's effort to help defeat Germany and its allies. The war effort also brought about significant social changes, such as an increase in women's participation in the workforce and a greater emphasis on government regulation of the economy.
In terms of international political policies, the U.S. entry into World War I marked a major shift in the country's foreign policy. Prior to the war, the U.S. had followed a policy of isolationism, avoiding involvement in European conflicts and focusing on building up its own economy and military strength. However, the war forced the U.S. to become more involved in global affairs, as it provided significant military and financial support to the Allied powers.
Following the end of the war, the U.S. played a key role in shaping the post-war world order, helping to establish the League of Nations and advocating for the principle of self-determination for nations around the world. However, the failure of the U.S. to ratify the Treaty of Versailles and join the League of Nations marked a return to a more isolationist foreign policy in the years that followed. Overall, the U.S. entry into World War I marked a significant turning point in the country's culture and political policies, both domestically and internationally.
Explanation:
Identify two primary sources from online databases or archives that help you understand the royal proclamation of 1763.
The Royal Proclamation of 1763, sometimes known as the Proclamation of 1763, was issued by King George III following Great Britain's victory in the French and Indian War. West of the Appalachian Mountains, the proclamation forbade colonisation on Native American land.
What did the 1763 Royal Proclamation accomplish?On October 7, 1763, King George III published the Royal Proclamation of 1763. The Seven Years' War was officially concluded by the Treaty of Paris, which also gave Great Britain control over French territories in North America. At the Eastern Continental Divide in the Appalachian Mountains, the Proclamation Line of 1763 was a boundary drawn by the British. The Proclamation Line, which was established on October 7, 1763, banned Anglo-American colonists from settling on territories obtained from the French after the French and Indian War.The Royal Proclamation served as the cornerstone for the development of Canada's territorial framework and is a key document in the relationship between First Nations people and the Crown. The opportunity to honour this memorial as a significant moment in Canadian history is rare.To learn more about The Royal Proclamation of 1763, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/2776713
King George III issued the Royal Proclamation of 1763, also known as the Proclamation of 1763, following Great Britain's victory in the French and Indian War.
What was the Royal Proclamation of 1763 used for?Anglo-American colonists were prohibited from settling in French-occupied territory following the French and Indian War by the Proclamation Line, which was established on October 7, 1763.
The Royal Proclamation of 1763 was made public by King George III on October 7, 1763. The Treaty of Paris, which also gave Great Britain control over French territories in North America, marked the official end of the Seven Years' War.
The British established a boundary in 1763 by drawing the Proclamation Line at the Eastern Continental Divide in the Appalachian Mountains. The Royal Proclamation is an important document in the relationship between First Nations people and the Crown. It was the foundation for the creation of Canada's territorial framework. It is extremely uncommon to commemorate this memorial as a significant moment in Canadian history.
To learn more about Proclamation Line visit :
https://brainly.com/question/510294
#SPJ1
Nativists opposed the arrival of many new immigrants in America mainly
because they saw new immigrants as a threat to:
A. industrialization and urbanization.
OB. unions and the labor movement.
C. American culture and values.
D. Progressive reform movements.
Answer:
(C.) American culture and values
Explanation:
Nativists wanted America to stay as a pure nation based on the original, Anglo Europeans who settled across the 13 colonies.
Differentiate between white man's burden and nationalism.
a. Nationalism is when you hate your country but white man's burden is when you love your country
b. White man's burden is when white people think it is their job or duty to "ducate" the other races but nationalism is when you think your country is the best
c. White man's burden is when you hate your country but nationalism is when you love your country
d. Nationalism is when white people think it is their job or duty to
"educate" the other races but white man's burden is when you think your country is the best
The White Man's Burden is a concept that originated during the colonial era when white Europeans believed it was their duty to bring civilization to non-white people.
Why was this a justification for colonial control?It was a form of justification for colonialism and imperialism. In contrast, nationalism is the ideology that emphasizes the love and devotion to one's country and its interests. It is a sense of pride and loyalty towards one's nation.
The two concepts differ in their focus and intention, as the White Man's Burden is centered on the idea of superiority and responsibility towards others, while nationalism is about prioritizing one's own country and people.
Read more about nationalism here:
https://brainly.com/question/1287645
#SPJ1
Which election loss forced the conservative movement to reorganize and change tactics?
A. Kennedy - Nixon
B. Carter - Ford
C. Reagan - Ford
D. Johnson - Goldwater
How is an Amendment to the Constitution (a) proposed and (b) ratified?
Answer:
(a) Proposed by Congress: An amendment can be proposed by a two-thirds vote of both the House of Representatives and the Senate.
(b) Proposed by a Constitutional Convention: An amendment can be proposed by a Constitutional Convention called for by two-thirds of state legislatures. However, this method has never been used to date.
After an amendment has been proposed, it must be ratified in one of two ways:
(a) Ratified by the States: An amendment can be ratified by three-fourths of the state legislatures. This is the method used for all current amendments except for the 21st Amendment.
(b) Ratified by Conventions: An amendment can be ratified by conventions in three-fourths of the states. The only amendment that was ratified using this method was the 21st Amendment, which repealed Prohibition in 1933.
Explanation:
List and explain two ways diplomacy was used in containment.
During the Cold War, the US employed a containment strategy to prevent the spread of communism. It was crucial to execute this approach diplomatically. Here are two instances where solitary confinement has been used diplomatically:
Alliance formation: To build alliances with countries that recognized its commitment to containing communism, the United States used diplomacy. The most notable example of this is when NATO, or the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, was established, which was about 1949.
NATO was an alliance of democratic nations led by the United States with the purpose of deterring Soviet aggression. By forging connections with other nations, America was able to contribute to the formation of a coalition to counter the Communist Union's power and halt the spread of communism.
Treaties and agreements were resolved through the diplomatic procedure with said Eastern Bloc and several other communist countries. One of the most significant aspects of this was the Strategic Arms Reduction Talks (SALT) seen between American Usa and the Ussr in the 1970s.
As a result of the SALT discussions, two accords that restrict the number of strategic nuclear weapons which every country may possess were signed. These agreements helped to improve relationship of the two superpowers and lessen the possibility of nuclear conflict.
Diplomatic accords were also used to end conflicts in countries like Korea, Vietnam, and Cuba. In order to implement the Cold War restriction strategy, diplomacy was crucial through the formation of allies.
Learn more about diplomatically here:
https://brainly.com/question/16400773
What seems to be the easiest and most effective way to get the government to hear and respond to your concerns? Explain.
Answer:
The easiest and most effective way to get the government to hear and respond to your concerns is through active participation in the democratic process, including exercising your right to vote and contacting your elected representatives. By voting in elections, you can choose representatives who share your values and who will work to address the issues that concern you. Additionally, by contacting your elected representatives through phone calls, emails, letters, or in-person meetings, you can voice your concerns and opinions and urge them to take action on your behalf.
It is also important to join and support organizations that advocate for the issues that you care about. These organizations can amplify your voice and help to build momentum and support for your cause. Social media can also be a powerful tool for raising awareness and mobilizing people around a particular issue.
Overall, it is important to remember that government officials are elected to serve the public and to represent their constituents. By actively participating in the democratic process, you can hold them accountable and ensure that your concerns are heard and addressed.
Explanation:
The most effective ways to get the government to hear and respond to your concerns include voting in elections, organizing or signing petitions, and directly contacting your local representatives. Each method allows for active participation in the democratic process.
Explanation:The easiest and most effective way to get the government to hear and respond to your concerns is through a variety of methods, including but not limited to voting, petitioning, and contacting your local representatives. Voting is crucial because it allows citizens to express their views on the officials who make vital choices on their behalf.
Another method is through petitioning, a democratic device where citizens may express their issues and require action from their government. This age-old method can compel the government to address the concerns therein. Finally, directly contacting your local representatives, such as Members of Parliament, senators, or city council members, can be a very effective way to voice your concerns. These elected representatives are there to serve the interests of their constituents and should take your concerns seriously.
Learn more about Political participation here:https://brainly.com/question/357949
#SPJ2
Progressive goals included all of the following, except...
One of the key goals of the Progressive Period movement was to remove corruption in government. They made it a point to emphasize family, education, and many other critical factors that are still reinforced today.
Which is less expensive, Geico or Progressive?
Both Geico and Progressive provide cheaper average premiums on plans for drivers and homeowners, but if price is the most important factor, Geico wins. Its average prices are cheaper than Progressive's average rates, and the company's vast discount list may help you save much more. Geico and Progressive outperform State Farm in terms of typical rates, the quantity of discounts available, and customer service. Geico is also one of the top five vehicle insurance providers, along with Travelers, USAA, and Progressive, that are less expensive on average than State Farm.
Know more about government Visit:
https://brainly.com/question/16940043
#SPJ1
help!!! I will give all my brainiest (253) depending on the answer you give !!! (middle school)
This template will help you write a speech about ratifying the Constitution. Remember to include lines that explain checks and balances, as well as the viewpoints of the Federalists and Anti-Federalists.
Speech Title: Balancing Power in the Constitution
Your Name:
Reviewer (Parent or Guardian):
Date:
First Paragraph: Hook your audience into wanting to read or hear your speech. You can tell a story or use a quote. Introduce the event and basic facts like people and places. Use at least three to five sentences.
Second paragraph: Discuss the separation of powers and checks and balances. Use examples to explain the difference between the two ideas.
Third paragraph: Discuss the position of the Federalists related to ratification of the Constitution. Use facts.
Fourth paragraph: Discuss the position of the Anti-Federalists related to ratification of the Constitution. Use facts.
Fifth paragraph: Summarize and review what you wrote.
Reviewer Suggestions:
Answer:
Speech Title: Balancing Power in the Constitution
Your Name: [Insert Your Name]
Reviewer (Parent or Guardian): [Insert Reviewer's Name]
Date: [Insert Date]
First Paragraph:
Ladies and gentlemen, have you ever thought about how our country was formed and the framework that our founding fathers laid down for us to follow? Well, let me take you back to the year 1787. Our country was in turmoil as the Articles of Confederation were not working effectively, and there was a need for a new constitution. In this speech, I will discuss the importance of balancing power in the Constitution and why it was necessary to have checks and balances.
Second Paragraph:
The separation of powers and checks and balances are two fundamental concepts in the Constitution. The separation of powers means that the government is divided into three branches: the legislative, executive, and judicial. Each branch has its own responsibilities and powers. Checks and balances, on the other hand, means that each branch has the ability to limit the power of the other branches. For example, the legislative branch can override a veto from the executive branch, and the judicial branch can declare a law passed by the legislative branch unconstitutional.
Third Paragraph:
The Federalists believed in the ratification of the Constitution. They argued that a strong federal government was necessary to maintain order and protect the nation's interests. They also believed that the Constitution provided sufficient protections for individual rights.
Fourth Paragraph:
The Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, were against the ratification of the Constitution. They believed that a strong federal government would lead to tyranny, and they feared that the Constitution did not adequately protect individual rights. They argued for a Bill of Rights to be added to the Constitution to protect individual liberties.
Fifth Paragraph:
In conclusion, balancing power in the Constitution was crucial to ensuring that no one branch of government had too much power. The separation of powers and checks and balances were designed to prevent tyranny and protect individual liberties. While the Federalists and Anti-Federalists had differing opinions on the ratification of the Constitution, their debates and discussions helped to shape the document that has been the foundation of our government for over 200 years.
Reviewer Suggestions:
Great job! You did an excellent job of explaining the importance of balancing power in the Constitution and providing examples of checks and balances. You also provided a clear explanation of the Federalist and Anti-Federalist positions on the ratification of the Constitution. One suggestion would be to include more specific examples of how checks and balances work in practice. Overall, a well-written and informative speech!
Ngo Dinh Diem became a liability for President Kennedy especially after the US media reported
a. The misuse of American funding in Vietnam.
b. That Diem ordered the assassination of 1,000s of Vietnamese civilians.
c. That Diem badmouthed President Kennedy.
d. About a Buddhist monk's public immolation.
Answer:
d. About a Buddhist monk's public immolation.
Complete the chart about the bill of rights.
The answer is The given rights in the chart are as follows:
6th Amendment - Fair and speedy trial7th Amendment - Trial by jury8th Amendment - No cruel and unusual punishment9th Amendment - Addresses rights.10th Amendment - Powers not given to the federal government belongs to the states or people.What kind of rights are examples of?They have the rights to life, a fair trial, freedom from torture and other inhumane treatment, freedom of expression, freedom of religion, and the rights to health, education, and a living standard that is enough.
What is the difference between it and a privilege?The freedom of expression, of the press, of religion, and of family life are examples of rights that cannot be legally not given . A privilege is a particular benefit that may be granted and revoked.
To know more about Rights visit:
https://brainly.com/question/11254636
#SPJ1
Which of the following was NOT one of the official articles of impeachment against Richard Nixon?
A. Obstruction of justice
B. Lying under oath
C. Abuse of power
D. Contempt of Congress
In what ways does the World Trade Organization (WTO) affect the U.S.? Select all that apply.
A. The U.S. is not allowed to manufacture goods in ways that might damage the environment.
B. The U.S. is discouraged from placing tariffs on foreign products to protect companies that manufacture similar goods in the U.S.
C. The U.S. is not allowed to trade with countries that are governed by dictators or that deprive their citizens of basic rights, like
freedom of speech.
D. The U.S. cannot take steps to protect the environment by discouraging American consumers from purchasing goods that were
produced in environmentally destructive ways.
E. The U.S. is not allowed to charge less than their competitors charge for the products that they sell overseas, because this might
drive their foreign competitors out of business.
The U.S. is discouraged from placing tariffs on foreign products to protect companies that manufacture similar goods in the U.S. World Trade Organization affect the U.S.
Option B is correct.
What is the WTO's significance?The WTO has made India's export competitiveness better. The lower tax has coordinated with the worldwide economy all the more productively. Technology and ideas have been transferred and exchanged in order to advance India's growth and development. Due to market access, costs and time are reduced.
What is the World Trade Organization's mission?To put it succinctly, the only international organization that deals with global trade regulations is the World Trade Organization (WTO). Its primary function is to guarantee that trade proceeds freely, predictably, and without incident.
Learn more about World Trade Organisation:
brainly.com/question/13903089
#SPJ1
What is the correct definition of capacity for potential cosigners?
Answer: Te correct definition of Capacity for potential cosigners is the financial ability to repay a loan with present income.
Explanation:
What is the relationship between Islam and
the empire of Mali? Please be at least 50 words.
"Islam played a significant role in the empire of Mali, particularly during the reign of Mansa Musa in the 14th century. Mansa Musa, who is considered one of the wealthiest individuals in history, was a devout Muslim and made a pilgrimage to Mecca, bringing back Islamic scholars and architects to help build mosques and centers of Islamic learning in Mali. Under his reign, Islam became more widespread and influential in Mali, shaping its culture, society, and governance." (ChatGPT, 2023)
Compelling Question: How do the sources we get exposed to impact how we understand and remember history?
Document A:
Evidence of What The White Supremacist View Believes/Stands For Based on This Document
Connections Between What The White Supremacist View Is and What it Promotes or Ignores
Inferences on How The White Supremacist View (in isolation) Would Impact Historical Understanding
Significance of These Inferences
Document B:
Evidence of What The White Supremacist View Believes/Stands For Based on This Document
Connections Between What The White Supremacist View Is and What it Promotes or Ignores
Inferences on How The White Supremacist View (in isolation) Would Impact Historical Understanding
Significance of These Inferences
Document C:
Evidence of What The White Supremacist View Believes/Stands For Based on This Document
Connections Between What The White Supremacist View Is and What it Promotes or Ignores
Inferences on How The White Supremacist View (in isolation) Would Impact Historical Understanding
Significance of These Inferences
Document D:
Evidence of What The White Supremacist View Believes/Stands For Based on This Document
Connections Between What The White Supremacist View Is and What it Promotes or Ignores
Inferences on How The White Supremacist View (in isolation) Would Impact Historical Understanding
Significance of These Inferences
Document E:
Evidence of What The White Supremacist View Believes/Stands For Based on This Document
Connections Between What The White Supremacist View Is and What it Promotes or Ignores
Inferences on How The White Supremacist View (in isolation) Would Impact Historical Understanding
Significance of These Inferences
Reflection Questions:
How similar or different is this view of Reconstruction to your own family or community’s view?
What elements of this view of Reconstruction can you see in the United States today?
How does thinking about how the views someone is exposed to impacts how they understand and remember history make you aware of what views you are personally being exposed to?
How do you think this idea of exposure shaping understanding impacts you and how you understand disagreements?
Answer: Electronic copies of this document are available from the Computer ... law enforcement agents to understand how to obtain electronic evidence stored.
Explanation:
Restoration of the Union, reform of southern society, and adoption of progressive laws promoting the rights of emancipated slaves were the three main goals of reconstruction.
What was reconstruction era?
The Reconstruction era, which began after the American Civil War and lasted roughly until the Compromise of 1877, was a time in American history.
Attempts were made to reconstruct the nation after the brutal Civil War, admit the former Confederate states back into the union, and address the political, social, and economic repercussions of slavery during Reconstruction.
The 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments to the Constitution were enacted during this time period, presumably guaranteeing the newly freed slaves the same civil rights as those of white people and ending the last Confederate secession in the South.
The U.S. military was given sovereignty over formerly separatist states by Congress, who also mandated that the former Confederate states adopt civil rights protections.
Learn more about reconstruction era, here
https://brainly.com/question/14423201
#SPJ2
The area directly outside a city is called _____.
rural
urban
suburban
Answer: C
Explanation: Rural is country, urban is city, suburban is outside of city but still close
The Powhatan Indians conquered other native tribes and received tribute
from the conquered tribes in the form of food.
O True
O False
Answer:
Explanation:
False.
The Powhatan Indians were a group of indigenous people who lived in Virginia in the 17th century. They were not known for conquering other native tribes or receiving tribute from them. Instead, they were a confederation of tribes that had a complex social and political structure. They were known for their farming, hunting, and fishing skills, and their interactions with the English colonists who arrived in their territory in the early 1600s were marked by both cooperation and conflict.
Complete the chart about federalist and entifederalist.
The Federalists supported the Constitution and wanted a stronger national government. The Antifederalists opposed the Constitution because they wanted more power to remain with states.
The Federalists were primarily represented New England and Mid-Atlantic States. In the case of Anti-Federalists, they were largely represented within the states of New York, Virginia, and Massachusetts.
The Federalists oppose including a bill of rights on the ground that it was unnecessary. The Anti-Federalists, who were afraid of a strong centralized government, refused to support the Constitution without one.
The Founding Fathers consisted of George Washington (Federalist), Alexander Hamilton (Federalist Paper Author - Federalist), John Adams (Federalist), James Madison (Federalist Paper Author - Federalist), John Jay (Federalist Paper Author - Federalist), Patrick Henry (Antifederalist), James Monroe (Antifederalist), Richard Henry Lee (Antifederalist), George Manson (Antifederalist), Sam Adams (Antifederalist).
The Federalists supported an effective central government. They supported the establishment of a national bank and favored an industrial, international trade, and commercial economy. The main and most persistent criticism of the Constitution made by the Anti-Federalists was that it did not place any restrictions on the power of the federal government to levy taxes. Nearly all of the works by Antifederalists have as a recurring topic Congress' unrestricted ability to raise taxes.
Federalists supported representational, as opposed to direct, democracy and supported lesser state governments, strong central government, indirect election of government officials, lengthier term restrictions for officeholders. The ratification of the Constitution was contested by antifederalists. Their main contention was that the Constitution gave the federal government too much power and stripped the states of too much authority.
Thanks,
Eddie E.