Question 14 3 pts A sample of n = 9 scores has SS = 72. The variance for this sample is s2 = 9. True O False

Answer:

The estimated proportion of Americans over 45 who smoke is 0.239 or 239/1000.

Step-by-step explanation:

To estimate the proportion of Americans over 45 who smoke, we need to calculate the fraction of the sample who smoke.

The number of people who don't smoke is 631, so the number of people who smoke is:

830 - 631 = 199

Therefore, the fraction of Americans over 45 who smoke is:

199/830 = 0.239 (rounded to three decimal places)

So, the estimated proportion of Americans over 45 who smoke is 0.239 or 239/1000.

To estimate the proportion of Americans over 45 who smoke, we first need to find the number of people in the sample who do smoke. We can do this by subtracting the number of people who don't smoke from the total sample size:
Therefore, we estimate that approximately 0.240 or 24.0% of Americans over 45 smoke.

Step 1: To estimate the proportion of Americans over 45 who smoke, we first need to find out how many people in the sample do smoke. Since we have a sample of 830 Americans and 631 don't smoke, we can subtract the non-smokers from the total sample to find the number of smokers.

830 (total) - 631 (non-smokers) = 199 (smokers)

Step 2: Now, we can calculate the proportion of smokers in the sample by dividing the number of smokers (199) by the total number of people in the sample (830).

199 (smokers) / 830 (total) = 0.2398 (rounded to four decimal places)

As a fraction, this would be approximately 240/1000, which can be simplified to 12/50.

So, the estimated proportion of Americans over 45 who smoke based on the given data is 0.240 or 12/50.

Learn more about :

Fraction : brainly.com/question/8482939

Sample : brainly.com/question/24466382

Estimate : brainly.com/question/17961193

Data : brainly.com/question/30051017

#SPJ11

Based on the information given, we can use the formula for a confidence interval to estimate the population mean paper length with 95% confidence.

The formula is:
Confidence interval = sample mean ± (critical value) x (standard error)
First, we need to calculate the standard error, which measures the variability of the sample mean. The formula for standard error is:
Standard error = standard deviation / √sample size
Plugging in the values given:
Standard error = 0.02 / √100
Standard error = 0.002
Next, we need to find the critical value from the t-distribution table for a 95% confidence level with 99 degrees of freedom (100 samples - 1). This value is approximately 1.984.
Now we can plug in all the values into the confidence interval formula:
Confidence interval = 10.998 ± (1.984) x (0.002)
Confidence interval = 10.994 to 11.002
Therefore, we can estimate with 95% confidence that the population mean paper length is between 10.994 inches and 11.002 inches. It is possible that the production process has changed and the paper length is no longer exactly 11 inches.

To construct a 95% confidence interval estimate for the population mean paper length given the production process, mean length, and sample paper length of 10.998 inches, follow these steps:
1. Identify the given values:
Sample mean (X) = 10.998 inches
Population mean (μ) = 11 inches
Standard deviation (σ) = 0.02 inches
Sample size (n) = 100
Confidence level = 95%
2. Calculate the standard error:
Standard error (SE) = σ / √n = 0.02 / √100 = 0.02 / 10 = 0.002
3. Determine the critical value (z-score) for a 95% confidence level:
Using a z-table or calculator, find the z-score corresponding to a 95% confidence level. In this case, the z-score is 1.96.
4. Calculate the margin of error:
Margin of error (ME) = z-score * SE = 1.96 * 0.002 = 0.00392
5. Construct the 95% confidence interval estimate:
Lower limit = X - ME = 10.998 - 0.00392 = 10.99408
Upper limit = X + ME = 10.998 + 0.00392 = 11.00192
The 95% confidence interval estimate for the population mean paper length is (10.99408, 11.00192) inches.

Visit here to learn more about population mean:

brainly.com/question/30727743

#SPJ11

-16  is the of x in the given expression.

To solve for x in the equation:

16x + 24/4 = -5(2 - 3x)

We can start by simplifying the equation using the order of operations (PEMDAS) and basic algebraic properties.

16x + 6 = -10 + 15x (distribute -5)

6 = -10 - x (move 15x to the left, and 16x to the right)

16 = -x (subtract 6 from both sides)

x = -16 (multiply both sides by -1)

Therefore, the solution to the equation is x = -16.

Learn more about algebraic Expression here:

https://brainly.com/question/953809

#SPJ1

The researcher is conducting a descriptive statistical analysis using a frequency distribution. In this analysis, the frequency refers to the number of times each response option (categories) on the Likert-type scale is selected by the participants.

The categories represent the different response options on the Likert scale, which typically range from strongly agree to strongly disagree or similar variations. By analyzing the frequency distribution of responses across these categories, the researcher can identify patterns, trends, and central tendencies in the data, which can be useful for understanding the overall attitudes or opinions of the participants regarding the topic being investigated. '

This type of analysis is often presented in the form of a table or bar chart, displaying the frequency of each response category, making it easy to interpret and visualize the results.

Learn more about analysis here:

https://brainly.com/question/29926939

#SPJ11

Answer:

Area: 200.96 in²

Circumference: 50.24 in

Step-by-step explanation:

Area of circle = r² · π

r = 8 in

π = 3.14

Let's solve

8² · 3.14 = 200.96 in²

Circumference of circle = 2 · r · π

r = 8 in

π = 3.14

Let's solve

2 · 8 · 3.14 = 50.24 in

So, Area: 200.96 in²

Circumference: 50.24 in

The table in this problem that shows a proportional relationship is given as follows:

Table b.

The rule is given as follows:

y = x/3.

A proportional relationship is a type of relationship between two quantities in which they maintain a constant ratio to each other.

The equation that defines the proportional relationship is given as follows:

y = kx.

In which k is the constant of proportionality, representing the increase in the output variable y when the constant variable x is increased by one.

In table b, we have that each value of y is one third of the equivalent value of x, hence the constant is given as follows:

k = 1/3.

Thus the equation is:

y = x/3.

More can be learned about proportional relationships at https://brainly.com/question/7723640

#SPJ1

According to Crown Royal Financial's review of unsecured loans over $10,000, they found that 5% of borrowers defaulted on their loans.

The Australian Financial Review is an Australian business-focused, compact daily newspaper covering the current business and economic affairs of Australia and the world.

Interestingly, only 30% of those who defaulted on their loans were homeowners, while 70% were renters. In contrast, among those who did not default on their loans, 60% were homeowners.

This suggests that homeownership may be a factor in a borrower's ability to repay their loan on time.

Know more about Crown Royal Financial's review here:

https://brainly.com/question/30630456

#SPJ11

The information that can be missing from the dot plot is the scale and data points.

Elias dot plot may not have a distinct scale on the axes, which makes it challenging to identify the precise values or quantities being displayed. This is based on the fundamental idea of a dot plot. A scale offers the required context for correctly analysing the data by, among other things, specifying the measurement intervals or units that were employed.

Furthermore, certain data points, such as the number of tropical fish in each tank or the exact values being displayed, may be absent from the dot plot. It would be difficult to evaluate the dot plot or make inferences from it without the actual data points. Overall, it is impossible to pinpoint exactly what information may be lacking without further detailed details concerning Elias' dot plot.

Read more about dot plot on:

https://brainly.com/question/25957672

#SPJ4

The clockwise direction to the vector (-1/2)x + (sqrt(3)/2)y, (-sqrt(3)/2)x - (1/2)y).

To find the matrix A of the linear transformation T that rotates any vector in R2 through an angle of 120 degrees in the clockwise direction, we can use the following steps:

Find the image of the standard basis vectors under T:

T(1,0) = (cos(120), -sin(120)) = (-1/2, -sqrt(3)/2)

T(0,1) = (sin(120), cos(120)) = (sqrt(3)/2, -1/2)

Use these images as the columns of A:

A = [(-1/2, sqrt(3)/2), (-sqrt(3)/2, -1/2)]

This matrix represents the linear transformation that rotates any vector in R2 through an angle of 120 degrees in the clockwise direction.

To see why this works, let's consider the effect of this transformation on an arbitrary vector (x,y):

T(x,y) = (x(-1/2) + y(sqrt(3)/2), x(-sqrt(3)/2) + y(-1/2))

= (-1/2)x + (sqrt(3)/2)y, (-sqrt(3)/2)x - (1/2)y)

This means that the vector (x,y) is rotated through an angle of 120 degrees in the clockwise direction to the vector (-1/2)x + (sqrt(3)/2)y, (-sqrt(3)/2)x - (1/2)y).

To learn more about transformation visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13801312

#SPJ11

An argument is considered valid if the conclusion logically follows from the premises, meaning that the truth of the premises guarantees the truth of the conclusion.

An argument is considered valid if the conclusion logically follows from the premises, meaning that the truth of the premises guarantees the truth of the conclusion. In other words, an argument is valid if it is impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion to be false at the same time.

Therefore, an argument is considered valid if the conclusion is true whenever the premises are assumed to be true, as stated in the question. This is the fundamental requirement for a valid argument. However, it is important to note that even a valid argument can have false premises, which would make the conclusion false despite the logical validity of the argument.

Visit to know more about Premises:-

brainly.com/question/30466861

#SPJ11

The personal expenses that the Wonders spent more than they had budgeted were Credit Card and Pocket Money.

The personal expenses of the Wonders were Clothing, Credit Card and Pocket Money.

For Clothing, they spent less than the budget of $ 60 by spending $ 31.75. For Credit Card, they overspent the budget because they budgeted $50 but spent $ 60.

For Pocket Money, they again spent more than the budget as the budget was $ 80 but they spent $ 93.75.

Find out more on budgets at https://brainly.com/question/24940564

#SPJ1

To copy segment AB, D, The distance between points A and B needs to be identified for the construction.

A segment is a section of a line that is bounded by two unique ends and contains every point on the line between them. A segment is designated after its endpoints, therefore segment AB refers to the section of the line connecting points A and B.

To copy segment AB can be accomplished by utilizing a measuring instrument such as a ruler or tape measure to determine the distance between the two spots. Once the distance is determined, a new point that is the same distance away from point A as point B can be produced.

Find out more on segment here: https://brainly.com/question/17374569

#SPJ1

From Week 3 to Week 5, Gym A membership increases at a rate of 32 people per week,  and Gym B membership increases at a rate of 34 people per week. So, Gym B is growing faster.

The average rate of change of a function is given by the change in the output of the function divided by the change in the input of the function. Hence we must identify the change in the output, the change in the input, and then divide then to obtain the average rate of change.

From Week 3 to Week 5, the change in the input is given as follows:

5 - 3 = 2.

From the table for Gym A and graph for Gym B, the change in the output for each gym is given as follows:

Hence the rates are given as follows:

More can be learned about the average rate of change of a function at brainly.com/question/11627203

#SPJ1

To solve this problem, we need to use Green's Theorem, which relates the line integral of a vector field around a closed curve to the double integral of the curl of the same vector field over the region enclosed by the curve. Specifically, Green's Theorem states that:

∫C F. dr = ∬R curl(F) dA

where C is a closed curve that encloses the region R, F is a vector field, dr is a small displacement vector along the curve, and dA is a small area element in the plane.

Now, let's apply Green's Theorem to each of the integrals:

1. ∫C1 F. dr

Since C1 is not a closed curve, we cannot use Green's Theorem directly. However, we can use the fact that F is a conservative vector field to simplify the integral. Recall that if F is conservative, then there exists a scalar potential function φ such that F = ∇φ, where ∇ is the gradient operator. In this case, we know that F. dr = 5 along C3 from C2, so we can write:

∫C3 F. dr - ∫C2 F. dr = 5

But since F is conservative, we can apply the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus for Line Integrals to obtain:

∫C3 F. dr - ∫C2 F. dr = φ(P3) - φ(P2)

where P3 and P2 are the endpoints of C3 and C2, respectively. Therefore, we have:

∫C1 F. dr = ∫C3 F. dr - ∫C2 F. dr = φ(P3) - φ(P2) + 5

Note that the value of the integral depends only on the endpoints of C3 and C2, and not on the path taken between them.

2. ∫C2 F. dr

Since C2 is a closed curve, we can apply Green's Theorem directly. Let R be the region enclosed by C2, then we have:

∫C2 F. dr = ∬R curl(F) dA

Since F is conservative, we know that curl(F) = 0, so the double integral vanishes and we have:

∫C2 F. dr = 0

In other words, the line integral around a closed curve of a conservative vector field is always zero.

3. ∫C3 F. dr

We can apply Green's Theorem to C3 just like we did for C2. Let R be the region enclosed by C3, then we have:

∫C3 F. dr = ∬R curl(F) dA

Since curl(F) = 0, we again obtain:

∫C3 F. dr = 0

In summary, the values of the integrals are:

1. ∫C1 F. dr = φ(P3) - φ(P2) + 5

2. ∫C2 F. dr = 0

3. ∫C3 F. dr = 0

Note that the first integral depends on the potential function φ, which we do not have information about. Therefore, we cannot determine its value without more information about F.

Learn more about integral here:

https://brainly.com/question/18125359

#SPJ11

The mean exam score of student 2 for all four exams is 87.5.  Based on the information provided, you have a spreadsheet containing the scores of 50 students on 4 different exams. To calculate the mean exam score for Student 2 across all four exams, you need to follow these steps:

1. Locate the scores for Student 2 on all four exams. They should be on the first sheet of the spreadsheet and likely in a row or column corresponding to Student 2.

2. Add the scores of Student 2 for all four exams together. For example, if their scores were 80, 85, 90, and 95, the total would be 80 + 85 + 90 + 95 = 350.

3. To calculate the mean, divide the total score (from step 2) by the number of exams (which is 4 in this case). Using the example scores above, the mean would be 350 / 4 = 87.5.

So, the mean exam score for Student 2 for all four exams is 87.5. Keep in mind that this example assumes hypothetical exam scores; you will need to replace them with the actual scores found in the spreadsheet to obtain the correct mean score for Student 2.

Learn more about spreadsheet here:

https://brainly.com/question/8284022

#SPJ11

The constant term in the expression is 9.

The given expression is 2xy − 5x² y − 7x + 9

We have to find the constant term in the expression

In the expression x and y are the variables

Plus and minus are the operators

The numbers with variables are not constant and the term without any variable is constant

9 is the constant

Hence, the constant term in the expression is 9.

To learn more on Expressions click:

https://brainly.com/question/14083225

#SPJ1

Answer:

• 32 inches by 40 inches

Step-by-step explanation:

4:1 means that 4 inches on the actual painting, is 1 inch on the scaled painting.

4:1

8 by 10 inches

8 x 4 = 32 inches

10 x 4 = 40 inches

Can I please have brainly so I can level up? :)

32 inches by 40 inches,

just answering to help the other dude the brainliest

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

To calculate how much Gloria will pay over 30 years for her $70,000 mortgage at 7.5%, we need to use the formula for a standard mortgage payment, which is:

P = L[c(1 + c)^n]/[(1 + c)^n - 1]

Where:

P = the monthly payment

L = the loan amount

c = the monthly interest rate (annual interest rate divided by 12)

n = the total number of payments (30 years multiplied by 12 months per year)

First, we need to calculate the monthly interest rate:

c = 7.5% / 12 = 0.00625

Next, we need to calculate the total number of payments:

n = 30 years x 12 months per year = 360

Now we can plug in these values to the formula:

P = 70000[0.00625(1 + 0.00625)^360]/[(1 + 0.00625)^360 - 1]

P = $493.95

Therefore, Gloria will pay $493.95 per month for 30 years for her $70,000 mortgage at 7.5%. Over the course of the 30 years, she will pay a total of:

Total Payments = P x n = $493.95 x 360 = $177,822

So, Gloria will pay a total of $177,822 over 30 years for her $70,000 mortgage at 7.5%.

The theoretical probability and experimental probability of pulling a gold marble from the bag are 25% and 27.5% respectively.

Given that,

There are 10 brown, 10 black, 10 green, and 10 gold marbles in bag.

Total number of marbles = 40 marbles

A student pulled a marble, recorded the color, and placed the marble back in the bag.

Number of gold marbles in the bag = 10

Theoretical probability = Number of gold marbles / total number of marbles

                                      = 10/40

                                      = 1/4 = 25%

Frequency of gold marbles = 11

Experimental probability = 11/40 = 27.5%

Hence the theoretical and experimental probability are 25% and 27.5% respectively.

Learn more about Theoretical and Experimental Probability here :

https://brainly.com/question/31174264

#SPJ1

The value of 'x' is less than one. Then substitute x = 0.5 for the equation to be true.

Given that:

9 × ___ < 9

Inequality is defined as an equation that does not contain an equal sign. Inequality is a term that describes a statement's relative size and can be used to compare these two claims.

Let 'x' be the number in the blank space. Then we have

9 × x < 9

9x < 9

x < 1

The value of 'x' is less than one. Then substitute x = 0.5 for the equation to be true.

More about the inequality link is given below.

https://brainly.com/question/19491153

#SPJ1

Answer:

B , D , C

Step-by-step explanation:

the central angle x is equal to the measure of the arc that subtends it, so

x = 90°

similarly

z = 22°

similarly the central angle subtended by arc y° is y°

the 3 angles on the diameter sum to 180° , that is

x + y + z = 180°

90° + y + 22° = 180°

112° + y = 180° ( subtract 112° from both sides )

y = 68°

The volume V of a rectangular prism is given by the formula:

V = l x w x h

where l is the length, w is the width, and h is the height.

In this case, we have:

l = 12 inches

w = 25 inches

h = 20 inches

Substituting these values into the formula, we get:

V = 12 inches x 25 inches x 20 inches

Multiplying, we get:

V = 6,000 cubic inches

Therefore, the volume of the rectangular prism is 6,000 cubic inches.

The margin of error for the confidence interval with a 98% confidence level is 6.912. So, the correct answer is (f) 6.912. To find the margin of error of the confidence interval with a 98% confidence level for the scores of a standardized test, we'll follow these steps:

1. Identify the given values:
  - Population standard deviation (σ) = 12 points
  - Sample size (n) = 20 scores
  - Sample mean (x) = 99 points
  - Confidence level = 98%

2. Determine the appropriate z-score for a 98% confidence level. Since the remaining 2% is split evenly on both tails, we'll look for the z-value corresponding to 0.01 (1% in the tails). From the provided values, z0.01 = 2.576.

3. Calculate the standard error (SE) of the sample mean using the formula:
  SE = σ / √n = 12 / √20 ≈ 2.683

4. Calculate the margin of error (ME) using the formula:
  ME = z-score * SE = 2.576 * 2.683 ≈ 6.912

The margin of error for the confidence interval with a 98% confidence level is 6.912. So, the correct answer is (f) 6.912.

Learn more about interval here:

brainly.com/question/3050302

#SPJ11

The margin of error at a 98% confidence level is c) 5.259 points.

To determine the margin of error at a 98% confidence level, we need to calculate the critical value, which corresponds to the confidence level.

In this case, the critical value is 2.326, which can be found in the standard normal distribution table.

Therefore, the margin of error at a 98% confidence level is c) 5.259 points.

https://brainly.com/question/34721377

#SPJ12

a. Yes, the distribution of the number of cases of type II diabetes in the United States can be approximated by a Poisson distribution since it is a rare event and the number of cases is independent of each other.
b. The probability is calculated as P(X ≤ 10) = e^(-12) * 12^10 / 10!, which is approximately 0.112.
c. we can subtract the probability of X ≤ 10 from the probability of X ≤ 15. The probability is calculated as P(10 < X < 15) = P(X ≤ 15) - P(X ≤ 10) = e^(-12) * (12^11 / 11! + 12^12 / 12! + 12^13 / 13! + 12^14 / 14!) ≈ 0.215.
d. The probability of observing 19 or more cases can be calculated using the Poisson distribution formula, P(X ≥ 19) = 1 - P(X ≤ 18) = 1 - e^(-12) * (12^0 / 0! + 12^1 / 1! + ... + 12^18 / 18!) ≈ 0.0002, which is a very small probability.

a. The distribution of the number of cases of type II diabetes in the United States can be approximated by a Poisson distribution if the cases are rare, random, and independent events. Given the incidence rate of 12 per 100,000, it can be considered a rare event, and if we assume the cases are independent and random, we can approximate the distribution using a Poisson distribution. The mean (λ) is equal to the incidence rate, which is 12 cases per 100,000.

b. To find the probability that the number of cases of type II diabetes is less than or equal to 10 per 100,000, we need to calculate the cumulative probability for the Poisson distribution with λ = 12 and k = 10. This can be found using the formula:

P(X ≤ 10) = Σ [e^(-λ) * (λ^k) / k!] for k = 0 to 10

c. To find the probability that the number of cases of type II diabetes is greater than 10 but less than 15 per 100,000, we need to calculate the probability for the Poisson distribution with λ = 12 and k = 11, 12, 13, and 14. This can be found using the formula:

P(10 < X < 15) = Σ [e^(-λ) * (λ^k) / k!] for k = 11 to 14

d. To determine if we would expect to observe 19 or more cases of type II diabetes per 100,000 in the United States, we can find the probability of observing 19 or more cases using the Poisson distribution with λ = 12. This can be found using the formula:

P(X ≥ 19) = 1 - P(X ≤ 18) = 1 - Σ [e^(-λ) * (λ^k) / k!] for k = 0 to 18

If the probability is low (typically less than 0.05), then it would be unlikely to observe 19 or more cases of type II diabetes per 100,000 in the United States.

Learn more about Poisson distribution:

brainly.com/question/17280826

SPJ11

Answer:

#4 A- Height of trees (needs to be given in digits)

#5 A- 27

#6 D- 10

#7 D

#8 B- 19

#9 C Make a frequency table

Step-by-step explanation:

I'm not too sure, you should ask Brainly too!

The length of x and y in the right triangle are 21.21 units and 21.21 units respectively.

A right angle triangle is a triangle that has one of its angles as 90 degrees. The sum of angles in a triangle is 180 degrees.

Let's find the value of x and y using trigonometric ratios as follows:

sin 45 = opposite / hypotenuse

Therefore,

sin 45 = x / 30

cross multiply

x = 30 sin 45

x = 30 × 0.70710678118

x = 21.2132034356

x = 21.21 units

Therefore, let's find y.

cos 30 = adjacent / hypotenuse

cos 45 = y / 30

cross multiply

y = 30 cos 45

y = 0.70710678118 × 30

y = 21.2132034356

y = 21.21 units

learn more on right triangle here: https://brainly.com/question/8379621

#SPJ1

True. When the normality assumption is violated and the sample size is small. Transforming the dependent variable using the Box-Cox methodology with the suggested Lambda value can help ensure the normality of the sampling distribution.

Normality refers to the distribution of data being normally distributed, while sample size refers to the number of observations in a sample. Sampling refers to the process of selecting a subset of individuals or data points from a larger population.

A variable is any characteristic or attribute that can be measured or observed. The Lambda value is a parameter in the Box-Cox transformation that determines the type of transformation to be applied to the data.

Thus, When normality is violated and the sample size is too small to ensure the normality of the sampling distributions, one option is to try to transform the dependent variable using the Box-Cox methodology using the suggested Lambda value. This transformation can help stabilize the variance and achieve a more normal distribution, making it more suitable for parametric statistical tests.

Learn more about the normality here:- brainly.com/question/15170166.

#SPJ11

Based on the provided informations and given values, the value of k for the given function and domain is calculated to be 11.

To find the value of k for the function G(x) = |5x - 4|, we need to evaluate the function at the endpoints of the given domain and find the maximum value.

The domain of the function is 0 ≤ x ≤ 3, so we need to evaluate the function at x = 0 and x = 3.

When x = 0:

G(0) = |5(0) - 4| = 4

When x = 3:

G(3) = |5(3) - 4| = 11

So, the maximum value of the function occurs at x = 3, and the value is 11.

Since the function is continuous over the given domain, we know that the maximum value occurs either at one of the endpoints or at a critical point in between.

The critical point is where the expression inside the absolute value bars, 5x - 4, equals zero:

5x - 4 = 0

x = 4/5

However, 4/5 is not in the given domain, so the maximum value occurs at x = 3, and the value is 11.

We know that the maximum value of the function is k, so:

k = G(3) = 11

Therefore, the value of k for the given function and domain is 11.

Learn more about Domain :

https://brainly.com/question/29885272

#SPJ4

The difference in the total cost between the two mortgages is $515,645.

After calculation, we arrive at a monthly payment value of $2,762.81.

It should be noted that to obtain an accurate total for a fixed-rate mortgage plan, multiply these payments by 360, which will produce a final result of $993,411.60.

Subtracting the total fixed-rate amount from that of the adjustable-rate ($1,509,056.80), there exists a disparity of roughly $515,645.20.

Difference = $1,509,056.80 - $993,411.60 = $515,645.20.

Learn more about mortgage on

https://brainly.com/question/1318711

#SPJ1

Answer:

$407,909

Step-by-step explanation:

We must first determine the total payments for each mortgage in order to determine the difference between the two mortgages' total costs.

With regard to the adjustable-rate mortgage:

Years 1 through 5: 4% interest rate, a yearly payment of $2,506.43, and 5 years of payments

Years 6 through 15: 6% interest, $3,059.46 per month, and ten years of payments

Ages 16 to 25: 8% interest, $3,464.78 per month, and ten years of payments

Years 26 through 30: 10% APR, $3,630.65 a month, and 5 years of payments

We add the payments for each period to determine the adjustable rate mortgage's overall installments:

Total payments for the adjustable-rate mortgage are (Years 1–5) + (Years 6–15) + (Years 16–25) + (Years 26–30)

Relating to the fixed-rate mortgage:

3.630.65 as the monthly payment, 4.45% as the interest rate, and 30 years to pay

We multiply the monthly payment by the number of months (30 years * 12 months/year = 360 months) to determine the total payments for the fixed-rate mortgage.

$3,630.65 * 360 is the sum of all fixed-rate mortgage payments.

The two mortgages' combined total costs differ in the following ways:

Difference is the sum of the payments made on the fixed-rate and adjustable-rate mortgages.

Using a calculator to calculate the values:

($2,506.43 * 60) + ($3,059.46 * 120) + ($3,464.78 * 120) + ($3,630.65 * 60) = $1,038,101.80 in total payments for the adjustable rate mortgage.

Total mortgage payments: $3,630.65 multiplied by 360 equals $1,446,000.00.

Difference: $407,898.20 - $1,446,000.00 or $1,038,101.80.

The total cost difference between the two mortgages, rounded to the closest dollar, is roughly -$407,898. The appropriate response is "$407,909."

The amount of money saved by Kaitlin is $6.

We have,

Cost of Game= $12

Amount Kaitlin saved= 1/2 of total money

So, She saved

= 12 x 1/2

= 12 x 1/2

= 6 x 1

= $6

Thus, Kaitlin saved $6.

Learn more about Unitary Method here:

https://brainly.com/question/22056199

#SPJ1