Prove: If one interior angle of a triangle is right or obtuse, then both the other interior angles are acute. Can only use Neutral Geometry, nothing from Euclidian Geometry.

The value of the line integral over the given curve c is 16/5.

We are given the line integral:

css

Copy code

l = ∫c [tex][x^2*y*dx + (x^2-y^2)*dy][/tex]

We will evaluate this integral over the given curve c, which is the arc of the parabola y=x^2 from (0,0) to (2,4).

We can parameterize this curve c as:

makefile

Copy code

x = t

y =[tex]t^2[/tex]

where t goes from 0 to 2.

Using this parameterization, we can express the differential elements dx and dy in terms of dt:

css

Copy code

dx = dt

dy = 2t*dt

Substituting these expressions into the line integral, we get:

css

Copy code

l = [tex]∫c [x^2*y*dx + (x^2-y^2)*dy][/tex]

 = [tex]∫0^2 [t^2*(t^2)*dt + (t^2-(t^2)^2)*2t*dt][/tex]

 = [tex]∫0^2 [t^4 + 2t^3*(1-t)*dt][/tex]

 = [tex][t^5/5 + t^4*(1-t)^2] from 0 to 2[/tex]

 = 16/5

Therefore, the value of the line integral over the given curve c is 16/5.

For such more questions on line integral

https://brainly.com/question/28381095

#SPJ11

The options that can be used to find m∠abc are:

m∠abc = 180° - m∠bca

m∠abc = m∠bac + m∠bca

To find m∠abc, the measure of angle ABC, you can use the following expressions:

m∠abc = 180° - m∠bca (Angle Sum Property of a Triangle): This expression states that the sum of the measures of the angles in a triangle is always 180 degrees. By subtracting the measures of the other two angles from 180 degrees, you can find the measure of angle ABC.

m∠abc = m∠bac + m∠bca (Angle Addition Property): This expression states that the measure of an angle formed by two intersecting lines is equal to the sum of the measures of the adjacent angles. By adding the measures of angles BAC and BCA, you can find the measure of angle ABC.

Know more about measure of angle here:

https://brainly.com/question/31186705

#SPJ11

which expressions can be used to find m∠abc? select two options.

To show that A2 is similar to B2 if A is similar to B, we need to show that there exists an invertible matrix Q such that A2 = QB2Q-1.

Using the relationship A = PCP from the given information, we can express A2 as A2 = (PCP)(PCP) = PCPCP. We can then substitute B for A in this expression to obtain B2 = PBPCP.

To show that A2 is similar to B2, we need to find an invertible matrix Q such that A2 = QB2Q-1.

Know more about the invertible matrix

https://brainly.com/question/30403440

#SPJ11

[tex]\frac{2 \frac{1}{2} }{6.5}[/tex] as a fraction in simplest form is 5/13.

[tex]\frac{ \frac{5}{8} }{1 \frac{5}{8} }[/tex] as a fraction in simplest form is 5/13.

In Mathematics, a proportional relationship is a type of relationship that produces equivalent ratios and it can be modeled or represented by the following mathematical equation:

y = kx

Where:

Additionally, equivalent fractions can be determined by multiplying the numerator and denominator by the same numerical value as follows;

(2 1/2)/(6.5) = 2 × (2 1/2)/(2 × 6.5)

(2 1/2)/(6.5) = 5/13

(5/8)/(1 5/8) = 8 × (5/8)/(8 × (1 5/8))

(5/8)/(1 5/8) = 5/(8+5)

(5/8)/(1 5/8) = 5/13

In conclusion, there is a proportional relationship between the expression because the fractions are equivalent.

Read more on fraction here: brainly.com/question/29367657

#SPJ4

Missing information:

The question is incomplete and the complete question is shown in the attached picture.

A) testing for the equality of variances is an unreliable procedure that is not robust to violations of its requirements.

To know more about variances refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/14116780

#SPJ11

D(x) is the length of side AC of a right-angled triangle with sides AB and BC equal to x, and all sides enclosing an area of 24 square meters.

Therefore, D(x) = √[(24 - 2x)² - x²].

Since the triangle is right-angled, let the length of AB be x meters. Then, the length of BC must also be x meters since all the fencing is used for sides AB and BC. Let the length of AC be y meters. We can use the Pythagorean theorem to write:

x² + y² = AC²

Since AC is given to be a fixed length (the length of the existing brick wall), we can solve for y in terms of x:

y² = AC² - x²

y = √(AC² - x²)

The total length of fencing used is 24 meters, so:

AB + BC + AC = 24

x + x + AC = 24

AC = 24 - 2x

Substituting this expression for AC into the equation for y, we get:

y = √[(24 - 2x)² - x²]

Therefore, D(x) = √[(24 - 2x)² - x²].

Learn more about right-angled

brainly.com/question/13381746

#SPJ11

dydx = (-9-18x) / (1-2t), which is the derivative of y with respect to x as a function of t.

To find dydx as a function of t for the given parametric equations x=t−t² and y=−3−9t, we can use the chain rule of differentiation.

First, we need to express y in terms of x, which we can do by solving the first equation for t: t=x+x². Substituting this into the second equation, we get y=-3-9(x+x²).

Next, we can differentiate both sides of this equation with respect to t using the chain rule: dy/dt = (dy/dx) × (dx/dt).

We know that dx/dt = 1-2t, and we can find dy/dx by differentiating the expression we found for y in terms of x: dy/dx = -9-18x.

Substituting these values into the chain rule formula, we get:

dy/dt = (dy/dx) × (dx/dt)
= (-9-18x) × (1-2t)

You can learn more about function at: brainly.com/question/12431044

#SPJ11

Let the number of Eagles albums sold be x, therefore number of Thriller albums sold would be `(x/2)+15`.

We know that Together Eagles – "Their Greatest Hits (1971-1975)" album and Michael Jackson’s Thriller album sold 72 million copies.Hence, we can form the equation:x + (x/2 + 15) = 72 million

2x + x + 30 = 144 million

3x = 144 million - 30 million

3x = 114 million

x = 38 million

Therefore, the number of Eagles albums sold was 38 million.

The number of Thriller albums sold would be `(x/2)+15

= (38/2)+15

= 19+15

= 34`.

Thus, 38 million copies of Eagles album and 34 million copies of Michael Jackson's Thriller album were sold.

To know more about cost estimate visit :-

https://brainly.in/question/40164367

#SPJ11

The position of a particle moving in the xy plane is given by the parametric equations x(t)=cos(2^t) and y(t)=sin(2^t).

The parametric equations given are x(t)=cos(2^t) and y(t)=sin(2^t), which describe the position of a particle in the xy plane. The variable t represents time.

The particle is moving in a circular path, as the equations represent the x and y coordinates of points on the unit circle. The parameter 2^t determines the angle of the point on the circle, with t increasing over time.

As t increases, the angle 2^t increases, causing the particle to move counterclockwise around the circle. The period of the motion is not constant, as the angle 2^t increases exponentially with time.

For more questions like Equation click the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/29657983

#SPJ11

The dot product of two vectors ~u and ~v is defined as ~u · ~v = ||~u|| ||~v|| cosθ, where ||~u|| and ||~v|| are the magnitudes of ~u and ~v, respectively, The statement is false. It is not necessarily true that either ~u or ~v equals the zero vector if ~u · ~v = 0.

The dot product of two vectors ~u and ~v is defined as ~u · ~v = ||~u|| ||~v|| cosθ, where ||~u|| and ||~v|| are the magnitudes of ~u and ~v, respectively, and θ is the angle between ~u and ~v. If ~u · ~v = 0, then cosθ = 0, which means that θ = π/2 (or any odd multiple of π/2). This implies that ~u and ~v are orthogonal, or perpendicular, to each other.

In general, if ~u · ~v = 0, it only means that ~u and ~v are orthogonal, and there are infinitely many non-zero vectors that can be orthogonal to a given vector. Therefore, we cannot conclude that either ~u or ~v is the zero vector based solely on their dot product being zero.

However, it is possible for two non-zero vectors to be orthogonal to each other. For example, consider the vectors ~u = (1, 0, 0) and ~v = (0, 1, 0). These vectors are non-zero and orthogonal, since ~u · ~v = 0, but neither ~u nor ~v equals the zero vector.

Therefore, the statement that ~u · ~v = 0 implies ~u = ~0 or ~v = ~0 is false.

Learn more about dot product here:

https://brainly.com/question/30404163

#SPJ11

The maximum number of barrels per day imported in september 2003 was 1.72 million

To find the year when oil imports were greatest, we need to find the maximum value of the function I(t) = -0.015t^2 + 0.1t + 1.4, where t is in years since the start of 2000.

The maximum value of a quadratic function occurs at the vertex, which has x-coordinate equal to -b/2a for a function in the form [tex]ax^2 + bx + c.[/tex]For this function, a = -0.015 and b = 0.1, so the x-coordinate of the vertex is:

x = -b/2a = -0.1 / (2*(-0.015)) = 3.33

Since t is in years since the start of 2000, the year when oil imports were greatest is 2003.33 (or approximately September 2003).

To find the number of barrels per day imported that year, we can simply plug in t = 3.33 into the function I(t):

[tex]I(3.33) = -0.015(3.33)^2 + 0.1(3.33) + 1.4[/tex]= 1.72 million barrels per day

Therefore, the maximum number of barrels per day imported was approximately 1.72 million, and this occurred in September 2003.

Learn more about problem related to oil imports

brainly.com/question/499716

#SPJ11

You've completed the Gram-Schmidt process for QR factorization and filled in the third column of matrices Q and R: R(1,3) = a3 · q1, R(2,3) = a3 · q2, R(3,3) = a3 · q3

Given that you already have the first two orthonormal vectors q1 and q2, let's proceed with determining q3 and completing the third column of matrices Q and R.

Step 1: Calculate the projection of the original third column vector, a3, onto q1 and q2.
proj_q1(a3) = (a3 · q1) * q1
proj_q2(a3) = (a3 · q2) * q2

Step 2: Subtract the projections from the original vector a3 to obtain an orthogonal vector, v3.
[tex]v3 = a3 - proj_q1(a3) - proj_q2(a3)[/tex]

Step 3: Normalize the orthogonal vector v3 to obtain the orthonormal vector q3.
q3 = v3 / ||v3||

Now, let's fill in the third column of the Q and R matrices:

Step 4: The third column of Q is q3.

Step 5: Calculate the third column of R by taking the dot product of a3 with each of the orthonormal vectors q1, q2, and q3.
R(1,3) = a3 · q1
R(2,3) = a3 · q2
R(3,3) = a3 · q3

By following these steps, you've completed the Gram-Schmidt process for QR factorization and filled in the third column of matrices Q and R.

Learn more about Gram-schmidt process here:

https://brainly.com/question/30761089

#SPJ11

Dimitri played outside for 1 and 7/12 hours on Sunday.

To find the number of hours that Dimitri played outside on Sunday, we need to subtract the time he spent outside on Saturday from the total time he played outside over the weekend.

Total time outside = 2 and 3/4 hours

Time outside on Saturday = 1 and 1/6 hours

To subtract fractions with unlike denominators, we need to find a common denominator:

3/4 = 9/12

1/6 = 2/12

2 and 3/4 = 11/4

So we can rewrite the problem as:

11/4 - 1 and 2/12 = ?

To subtract mixed numbers, we first need to convert them to improper fractions:

1 and 2/12 = 14/12

Now we can subtract:

11/4 - 14/12 = (33/12) - (14/12) = 19/12

Therefore, Dimitri played outside for 1 and 7/12 hours on Sunday.

Learn more about the fraction here:

brainly.com/question/10354322

#SPJ1

Besides the madrigal, the chanson was another type of secular vocal music that enjoyed popularity during the Renaissance. The given four terms that need to be included in the answer are madrigal, secular, vocal music, and Renaissance.

What is the Renaissance?The Renaissance was a period of history that occurred from the 14th to the 17th century in Europe, beginning in Italy in the Late Middle Ages (14th century) and spreading to the rest of Europe by the 16th century. The Renaissance is often described as a cultural period during which the intellectual and artistic accomplishments of the Ancient Greeks and Romans were revived, along with new discoveries and achievements in science, art, and philosophy.What is a madrigal?A madrigal is a form of Renaissance-era secular vocal music. Madrigals were typically written in polyphonic vocal harmony, meaning that they were sung by four or five voices. Madrigals were popular in Italy during the 16th century, and they were characterized by their sophisticated use of harmony, melody, and counterpoint.What is secular music?Secular music is music that is not religious in nature. Secular music has been around for thousands of years and has been enjoyed by people from all walks of life. In Western music, secular music has been an important part of many different genres, including classical, pop, jazz, and folk.What is vocal music?Vocal music is music that is performed by singers. This can include solo performances, as well as performances by groups of singers. Vocal music has been an important part of human culture for thousands of years, and it has been used for everything from religious ceremonies to entertainment purposes.

To know more about Vocal music,visit:

https://brainly.com/question/32285518

#SPJ11

There are 3 internal nodes with degree 4 and 10 internal nodes with degree 3 in the tree t.

Let x be the number of internal nodes with degree 4, and y be the number of internal nodes with degree 3.

1. x + y = 13 (total internal nodes)
2. 4x + 3y = t - 1 (sum of degrees of internal nodes)

Since t has 24 leaves and 13 internal nodes, there are 24 + 13 = 37 nodes in total. So, t = 37 and we have:

4x + 3y = 36 (using t - 1 = 36)

Now, we can solve the two equations:

x + y = 13
4x + 3y = 36

First, multiply the first equation by 3 to make the coefficients of y equal:

3x + 3y = 39

Now, subtract the second equation from the modified first equation:

(3x + 3y) - (4x + 3y) = 39 - 36
-1x = 3

Divide by -1:

x = -3/-1
x = 3

Now that we have the value of x, we can find the value of y:

x + y = 13
3 + y = 13

Subtract 3 from both sides:

y = 13 - 3
y = 10

So, there are 3 internal nodes with degree 4 and 10 internal nodes with degree 3 in the tree t.

Learn more about nodes here:

https://brainly.com/question/31115287

#SPJ11

                                                                                                                          Using a t table with 7 degrees of freedom (since n - k - 1 = 7), we find the critical value for a = .05 (two-tailed test) to be ±2.365.

Step by Step calculation:

                                                                                                                a. To compute MSR and MSE, we need to use the following formula

MSR = SSR / k = SSR / 2

MSE = SSE / (n - k - 1) = (SST - SSR) / (n - k - 1)

where k is the number of independent variables, n is the sample size.

Plugging in the given values, we get:

MSR = SSR / 2 = 6216.375 / 2 = 3108.188

MSE = (SST - SSR) / (n - k - 1) = (6791.366 - 6216.375) / (10 - 2 - 1) = 658.396

Therefore, MSR = 3108.188 and MSE = 658.396.

b. The F test statistic is given by:

F = MSR / MSE

Plugging in the values, we get:

F = 3108.188 / 658.396 = 4.719 (rounded to 2 decimals)

Using an F table with 2 degrees of freedom for the numerator and 7 degrees of freedom for the denominator (since k = 2 and n - k - 1 = 7), we find the critical value for a = .05 to be 4.256.

Since our calculated F value is greater than the critical value, we reject the null hypothesis at a = .05 and conclude that there is significant evidence that at least one of the independent variables is related to the dependent variable. The p-value can be calculated as the area to the right of our calculated F value, which is 0.039 (rounded to 3 decimals).

c. The t test statistic for the significance of B1 is given by:

t = b1 / s b1

where b1 is the estimated coefficient for x, and s b1 is the standard error of the estimate.

Plugging in the given values, we get:

t = 0.0821 / 0.0573 = 1.433 (rounded to 3 decimals)

Using a t table with 7 degrees of freedom (since n - k - 1 = 7), we find the critical value for a = .05 (two-tailed test) to be ±2.365.

Since our calculated t value is less than the critical value, we fail to reject the null hypothesis at a = .05 and conclude that there is not sufficient evidence to suggest that the coefficient for x is significantly different from zero. The p-value can be calculated as the area to the right of our calculated t value (or to the left, since it's a two-tailed test), which is 0.186 (rounded to 3 decimals).

d. The t test statistic for the significance of B2 is given by:

t = b2 / s b2

where b2 is the estimated coefficient for x2, and s b2 is the standard error of the estimate.

Plugging in the given values, we get:

t = 4980 / 0.0573 = 86,815.26 (rounded to 3 decimals)

Using a t table with 7 degrees of freedom (since n - k - 1 = 7), we find the critical value for a = .05 (two-tailed test) to be ±2.365.

Since our calculated t value is much larger than the critical value, we reject the null hypothesis at a = .05 and conclude that there is strong evidence to suggest that the coefficient for x2 is significantly different from zero. The p-value is very small (close to zero), indicating strong evidence against the null hypothesis.

To Know more about area of t table refer here

https://brainly.com/question/30765524#

#SPJ11

The percent of the 7th grade students in favor of school uniforms is 42.9%

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

The table of values (see attachment)

From the table, we have

7th grade students = 112

7th grade students in favor = 48

So, we have

Percentage = 48/112 *100%

Evaluate

Percentage = 42.9%

Hence, the percentage in favor is 42.9%

Read more about percentage at

https://brainly.com/question/843074

#SPJ4

Given that General Motors' stock fell from $39.57 per share in 2013 to $28.72 per share in 2016.

If a person bought and sold 8 shares at these prices, the loss as a percent of the purchase price is as follows:

First, calculate the total cost of purchasing 8 shares in 2013.

It is given that the price of each share was $39.57 per share in 2013.

Hence the total cost of purchasing 8 shares in 2013 will be

= 8 × $39.57

= $316.56.  

Now, calculate the revenue received by selling 8 shares in 2016.

It is given that the price of each share was $28.72 per share in 2016.

Hence the total revenue received by selling 8 shares in 2016 will be

= 8 × $28.72

= $229.76.

The loss will be the difference between the purchase cost and selling price i.e loss = Purchase cost - Selling price

= $316.56 - $229.76

= $86.8

Therefore, the loss incurred on the purchase and selling of 8 shares is $86.8.

Now, calculate the loss percentage.

The formula for loss percentage is given by the formula:

Loss percentage = (Loss/Cost price) × 100.

Loss = $86.8 and Cost price = $316.56

∴ Loss percentage = (86.8/316.56) × 100

= 27.4%.

Therefore, the loss percentage is 27.4%.

To know more about stock visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31940696

#SPJ11

(a) To find the velocity after 2 seconds, we need to take the derivative of s(t) with respect to time t. It takes 9.25 seconds for the velocity to reach 40 m/s.

s(t) = 3t + 2t^2
s'(t) = 3 + 4t
Plugging in t = 2, we get:
s'(2) = 3 + 4(2) = 11
Therefore, the velocity after 2 seconds is 11 m/s.
(b) To find how long it takes for the velocity to reach 40 m/s, we need to set s'(t) = 40 and solve for t.
3 + 4t = 40
4t = 37
t = 9.25 seconds (rounded to two decimal places)

Learn more about m/s here:

https://brainly.com/question/29754083

#SPJ11

The cos(θ) is approximately 0.92.

We can use the Pythagorean identity to find cos(θ).

The Pythagorean identity states that [tex]sin^2[/tex](θ) + [tex]cos^2[/tex] (θ) = 1.

Given sin(θ) = 2/5, we can substitute this value into the equation:

[tex](2/5)^2 + cos^2(\pi) = 14/25 + cos^2(\pi) = 1[/tex]

Now, we can solve for

[tex]cos^2 (\theta): cos^2[\theta] = 1 - 4/25cos^2(\theta) = 25/25 - 4/25[tex]cos^2(\theta) = 21/25[/tex]

Taking the square root of both sides, we get:

cos(θ) = ± [tex]\sqrt(21/25)[/tex]

Since θ is in the first quadrant, we take the positive value:cos(θ) = sqrt(21/25)

Simplifying further:

cos(θ) = [tex]\sqrt(21)/\sqrt(25)[/tex]cos(θ) = sqrt(21)/5

Approximating the value of [tex]\sqrt(21)[/tex] to two decimal places:cos(θ) ≈ 0.92

Therefore, cos(θ) is approximately 0.92.

Learn more about Pythagorean identity here : brainly.com/question/10285501

#SPJ4

Our final solution is: cosy * y = 1/3 * x^3y^2 - 1/3 * pi^3 - pi

To solve the initial value problem dy/dx = 1/2 2xy^2/cosy-2x^2y with the initial value, y(1) = pi, we need to first separate the variables and integrate both sides.

Starting with the given differential equation, we can rearrange to get:

cosy dy/dx - 2x^2y dy/dx = 1/2 * 2xy^2

Now, we can use the product rule in reverse to rewrite the left-hand side as d/dx (cosy * y) = xy^2.

So, we have:

d/dx (cosy * y) = xy^2

Next, we can integrate both sides with respect to x:

∫d/dx (cosy * y) dx = ∫xy^2 dx

Integrating the left-hand side gives us:

cosy * y = 1/3 * x^3y^2 + C

where C is the constant of integration.

Using the initial value y(1) = pi, we can solve for C:

cos(pi) * pi = 1/3 * 1^3 * pi^2 + C

-1 * pi = 1/3 * pi^3 + C

C = -1/3 * pi^3 - pi

So, our final solution is:

cosy * y = 1/3 * x^3y^2 - 1/3 * pi^3 - pi

Answer in 200 words: In summary, to solve the initial value problem, we first separated the variables and integrated both sides. This allowed us to rewrite the equation in terms of the product rule in reverse and integrate it. We then used the initial value to solve for the constant of integration and obtained the final solution. It is important to remember that when solving initial value problems, we must always use the given initial value to find the constant of integration. Without it, our solution would be incomplete. This type of problem can be challenging, but by following the proper steps and using algebraic manipulation, we can arrive at the correct answer. It is also worth noting that the final solution may not always be in a simplified form, and that is okay. As long as we have solved the initial value problem and obtained a solution that satisfies the given conditions, we have successfully completed the problem.

Learn more on initial value problem here:

https://brainly.com/question/30547172

#SPJ11

To test for the significance of the coefficient on aggregate price index, we need to calculate the p-value.

The p-value is the probability of obtaining a result as extreme or more extreme than the one observed, assuming that the null hypothesis is true.

In this case, the null hypothesis would be that there is no relationship between the aggregate price index and the variable being studied. We can use statistical software or tables to determine the p-value.

Generally, if the p-value is less than 0.05, we can reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is a significant relationship between the aggregate price index and the variable being studied. If the p-value is greater than 0.05, we cannot reject the null hypothesis.

Learn more about p-value at

https://brainly.com/question/30461126

#SPJ11

Our estimate for the total number of people in the village who are older than 60 but not older than 80 is 96.

To estimate the total number of people in the village who are older than 60 but not older than 80, we need to use the information we have about the 50 people whose ages were recorded.

Let's assume that this sample of 50 people is representative of the entire village.
According to the table, there are 12 people who are older than 60 but not older than 80 in the sample.

To estimate the total number of people in the village who fall into this age range, we can use the following proportion:
(12/50) = (x/400)
where x is the total number of people in the village who are older than 60 but not older than 80.
Solving for x, we get:
x = (12/50) * 400 = 96.

For similar question on proportion.

https://brainly.com/question/20431505

#SPJ11

The options A, B, D, E, F, J  can not be derived by an application of existential elimination.

By eliminating an existential quantifier, one can infer a formula that contains a new variable using the predicate logic inference rule known as EE.

Since existential quantifiers are not present in atomic formulae, conjunctions, disjunctions, conditionals, biconditionals, negations, and the falsum, they cannot be derived using EE and can not be obtained via the use of EE.

Learn more about existential elimination:https://brainly.com/question/30035243

#SPJ1

Thus, parametric equation for the circumference of the ellipse : C ≈ 15.3.

To estimate the circumference of the ellipse given by the equation 16x^2 + 4y^2 = 64, we first need to find the parametric equations. Let's divide both sides of the equation by 64 to get:
x^2 / 4^2 + y^2 / 2^2 = 1

Now, we can use the parametric equations for an ellipse:
x = 4 * cos(t)
y = 2 * sin(t)

Now, we can find the arc length function ds/dt. To do this, we'll differentiate both equations with respect to t and then use the Pythagorean theorem:

dx/dt = -4 * sin(t)
dy/dt = 2 * cos(t)

(ds/dt)^2 = (dx/dt)^2 + (dy/dt)^2 = (-4 * sin(t))^2 + (2 * cos(t))^2

Now, find ds/dt:
ds/dt = √(16 * sin^2(t) + 4 * cos^2(t))

Now we can use Simpson's rule with n = 8 to estimate the circumference:
C ≈ (1/4)[(ds/dt)|t = 0 + 4(ds/dt)|t=(1/8)π + 2(ds/dt)|t=(1/4)π + 4(ds/dt)|t=(3/8)π + (ds/dt)|t=π/2] * (2π/8)

After plugging in the values for ds/dt and evaluating the expression, we find:
C ≈ 15.3 (rounded to one decimal place)

Know more about the parametric equation

https://brainly.com/question/30451972

#SPJ11

The reported p-value of 0.139 suggests that there is no significant evidence to reject the null hypothesis that the true mean distance traveled by the electric car is equal to 200 miles. This means that the sample data does not provide enough evidence to support Aaron's hypothesis that the car does not travel as far as the company claimed.

Since the p-value is greater than the significance level of 0.05, we fail to reject the null hypothesis at the 0.05 level of significance. In other words, we do not have enough evidence to conclude that the car's actual mean distance traveled is significantly different from the claimed distance of 200 miles.

Therefore, Aaron's hypothesis that the car does not travel as far as the company claimed is not supported by the data. He should continue to use the car as it is expected to travel 200 miles before requiring a recharge based on the company's claim.

To know more about distance, refer here :

https://brainly.com/question/13034462#

#SPJ11

Thus, the velocity function v(t) for the given  acceleration of a model car is given:

v(t) = { 1-t cm/sec for 0<=t<1;
        1 cm/sec for t>=1 }.

The given acceleration function is att)-1cm/sec', which means that the acceleration is negative and constant at -1cm/sec' for all values of t less than 1. We also know that the initial velocity at t=0 is 1 cm/sec.

To find the velocity function v(t), we need to integrate the acceleration function with respect to time.

For t less than 1, we have

att) = dv/dt = -1
Integrating both sides with respect to t, we get
v(t) - v(0) = -t
Substituting v(0) = 1 cm/sec, we get
v(t) = 1 - t cm/sec for 0<=t<1

For t greater than or equal to 1, the acceleration is zero, which means the velocity is constant.
Using the initial velocity at t=0 as 1 cm/sec, we have
v(t) = 1 cm/sec for t>=1

Therefore, the velocity function v(t) is given by
v(t) = { 1-t cm/sec for 0<=t<1;
        1 cm/sec for t>=1 }

Thus, the  velocity function v(t) for the given  acceleration of a model car is given v(t) = { 1-t cm/sec for 0<=t<1;
        1 cm/sec for t>=1 }.

Know more about the velocity function

https://brainly.com/question/25749514

#SPJ11

The solution is y(t) = 2ln(t).

To solve the initial value problem using Laplace transform, we first need to take the Laplace transform of both sides of the differential equation:

L[y' * y] = L[t]

where L denotes the Laplace transform. We can use the convolution theorem of Laplace transforms to simplify the left-hand side:

L[y' * y] = L[y'] * L[y] = sY(s) - y(0) * Y(s) = sY(s)

where Y(s) is the Laplace transform of y(t). We also take the Laplace transform of the right-hand side:

L[t] = 1/s²

Substituting these results into the original equation, we get:

sY(s) = 1/s²

Solving for Y(s), we get:

Y(s) = 1/s³

We can use partial fraction decomposition to find the inverse Laplace transform of Y(s):

Y(s) = 1/s³ = A/s + B/s²+ C/s³

Multiplying both sides by s³ and simplifying, we get:

1 = As² + Bs + C

Substituting s = 0, we get C = 1. Substituting s = 1, we get A + B + C = 1, or A + B = 0. Finally, substituting s = -1, we get A - B + C = 1, or A - B = 0.

Therefore, we have A = B = 0 and C = 1, and the inverse Laplace transform of Y(s) is:

y(t) = tv²/2

To find the solution to the initial value problem, we substitute y(t) into the equation y' * y = t and use the fact that y(0) = 0:

y' * y = t

y' * t²/2 = t

y' = 2/t

y = 2ln(t) + C

Using the initial condition y(0) = 0, we get C = 0. Therefore, the solution to the initial value problem is:

y(t) = 2ln(t)

Note that this solution is only valid for t > 0, since ln(t) is undefined for t <= 0.

Learn more about Laplace transform

brainly.com/question/30759963

#SPJ11

the lifetime of a radial tire that corresponds to the first percentile 36,250 miles

To identify the lifetime of a radial tire that corresponds to the first percentile, we need to find the value at which only 1% of the tires have a lower lifetime.

In a normal distribution, the first percentile corresponds to a z-score of approximately -2.33. We can use the z-score formula to find the corresponding value in terms of miles:

z = (X - μ) / σ

Where:

z = z-score

X = lifetime of the tire

μ = mean lifetime of the tires

σ = standard deviation of the lifetime of the tires

Rearranging the formula to solve for X, we have:

X = z * σ + μ

X = -2.33 * 2,510 + 42,100

X ≈ 36,250

Rounded to the nearest 10 miles, the lifetime of the tire that corresponds to the first percentile is 36,250 miles.

To know more about deviation visit:

brainly.com/question/31835352

#SPJ11

There are 59,280 to choose a president, a treasurer, and a secretary from a committee with forty members.

Given that it is to be chosen a president, a treasurer, and a secretary from a committee with forty members.

We need to find in how many ways could the three officers be chosen,

So, using the concept Permutation for the same,

ⁿPₓ = n! / (n-x)!

⁴⁰P₃ = 40! / (40-3)!

⁴⁰P₃ = 40! / 37!

⁴⁰P₃ = 40 x 39 x 38 x 37! / 37!

= 59,280

Hence we can choose in 59,280 ways.

Learn more about Permutation click;

https://brainly.com/question/29990226

#SPJ1