Please kindly help with solving this question
Use the power-reducing formulas to rewrite the expression to one that does not contain a trigonometric function of a power greater than 1. 4sin²xcos²x D

It can be partial differential equations, one for the function of x (X(x)) and another for the function of t (T(t)).  suggests that the product of the second derivative of X(x) with respect to x and  function T(t) is equal to a constant multiplied by the function U(x, t).

The given partial differential equation is t^2 * uU_xx + x * u * at * tu = 0, where u represents the function u(x, t), and subscripts denote partial derivatives with respect to the respective variables. To solve this equation, we can separate the variables by assuming u(x, t) = X(x) * T(t), where X(x) represents the function solely dependent on x, and T(t) represents the function solely dependent on t.Substituting this assumption into the original equation, we obtain t^2 * (X''(x) * T(t)) + x * (X(x) * T'(t) + X'(x) * T(t)) = 0. Now, we can divide the equation by t^2 * X(x) * T(t), resulting in (X''(x) / X(x)) + (x * T'(t) + X'(x) * T(t)) / (t * T(t)) = 0.
Since the left-hand side depends only on x, and the right-hand side depends only on t, they must be equal to a constant, denoted by A. Therefore, we have X''(x) / X(x) = -A and (x * T'(t) + X'(x) * T(t)) / (t * T(t)) = A.These equations can be further simplified and solved independently to find the functions X(x) and T(t), thus determining the solution u(x, t) = X(x) * T(t) of the given partial differential equation.


Learn more about partial differential equation here
https://brainly.com/question/1462049



#SPJ11

Therefore, the values of r in the general solution are r = 0 and r = 2.

To find the value of r in the general solution of the second-order differential equation 5y'' = 2y', we can rewrite the equation in standard form:

5y'' - 2y' = 0

Now, let's assume that the solution to this equation is of the form y(x) = c1eₓˣ + c2.

Taking the first and second derivatives of y(x), we have:

y'(x) = c1reˣ

y''(x) = c1r^2eˣ

Substituting these derivatives into the differential equation, we get:

5(c1r^2eˣ) - 2(c1reˣ) = 0

Simplifying the equation, we have:

c1(r² - 2r)eˣ = 0

For this equation to hold for all values of x, the coefficient of e^(rx) must be equal to zero:

r²- 2r = 0

Factoring out an r, we have:

r(r - 2) = 0

Setting each factor equal to zero, we get:

r = 0, r = 2

To know more about general solution,

https://brainly.com/question/32063596

#SPJ11

he area of one loop of the rose r = 2cos(30) is 6π.To find the area of one loop of the rose curve r = 2cos(30), we can use a double integral in polar coordinates. The loop is traced by the angle θ from 0 to 2π.

The area formula in polar coordinates is given by:
A = ∫∫ r dr dθ

For the given rose curve, r = 2cos(30) = 2cos(π/6) = √3.

Therefore, the double integral for the area becomes:
A = ∫[0 to 2π] ∫[0 to √3] r dr dθ

Simplifying the integral, we have:
A = ∫[0 to 2π] ∫[0 to √3] √3 dr dθ

Integrating with respect to r gives:
A = ∫[0 to 2π] [√3r] evaluated from 0 to √3 dθ
A = ∫[0 to 2π] √3√3 - 0 dθ
A = ∫[0 to 2π] 3 dθ
A = 3θ evaluated from 0 to 2π
A = 6π

Therefore, thethe area of one loop of the rose r = 2cos(30) is 6π.

to learn more about integral click here:brainly.com/question/31109342

#SPJ11

To determine whether the series        [tex]\sqrt{(2n)! (\sqrt{n^2+1} )}[/tex] converges or diverges using the Ratio Test, let's analyze the limit of the ratio of consecutive terms.

The Ratio Test states that if the limit of the absolute value of the ratio of consecutive terms, as n approaches infinity, is less than 1, then the series converges. If the limit is greater than 1, the series diverges. And if the limit is exactly equal to 1, the test is inconclusive.

Let's apply the Ratio Test to the given series:

[tex]\sqrt{(2n)! (\sqrt{n^2+1} )}[/tex]

To apply the Ratio Test, we need to calculate the following limit:

lim (n→∞) |[tex]a_{n+1}[/tex]/[tex]a_{n}[/tex]|, where [tex]a_{n}[/tex] represents the nth term of the series.

Let's calculate the limit:

lim (n→∞) |[tex]\sqrt{(2(n+1))! (\sqrt{(n+1)^2+1} )}[/tex] / [tex]\sqrt{(2n)! (\sqrt{n^2+1} )}[/tex] |

Simplifying the expression:

lim (n→∞) |([tex]{\sqrt{(2(n+1))!} / \sqrt{(2n)!}[/tex]) * [[tex]\sqrt{((n+1)^2+1)}[/tex] / [tex]\sqrt{(n^2+1)}[/tex]]|

Now, let's simplify the terms inside the absolute value:

Simplifying the factorial terms:

[tex]\sqrt{(2(n+1))!} / \sqrt{(2n)!}=[/tex] [tex]\sqrt{(2(n+1))} \sqrt{(2(n+1))-1)} \sqrt{(2(n+1))-2} .....\sqrt{(2n+2)}[/tex])

[tex](\sqrt{(2n+1)} )/ [\sqrt{(2n)} (\sqrt{ (2n)-1)}(\sqrt{(2n)-2)} ...\sqrt{2} \sqrt{((2)-1)}[/tex]

Most of the terms will cancel out, leaving only a few terms:

[tex](\sqrt{(2(n+1)!)} / \sqrt{(2n)!} =( \sqrt{2(n+1)}\sqrt{(2n+2)}\sqrt{2n+1)} ) / (\sqrt{(2n)} )[/tex]

Simplifying the square root terms:

[tex][\sqrt{(n+1)^2+1)} / \sqrt{n^2+1)}] = [(\sqrt{(n+1)+1)} / (\sqrt{n+1} )][/tex]

Now, let's substitute these simplified terms back into the limit expression:

lim (n→∞)[tex]|(\sqrt{(2(n+1)} )(\sqrt{(2n+2)})(\sqrt{(2n+1)}) / (\sqrt{(2n)} )(\sqrt{(n+1)+1)}) / \sqrt{n+1)} |[/tex]

Next, we can simplify the limit further by dividing the numerator and denominator by ([tex]\sqrt{n+1}[/tex]):

lim (n→∞) [tex]|((\sqrt{2(n+1))} (\sqrt{(2n+2)})(\sqrt{(2n+1))}) / ((\sqrt{2n)})\sqrt{(n+1+1)} / 1|[/tex]

Simplifying the expression:

lim (n→∞) [tex]|(\sqrt{(2(n+1)} )(\sqrt{2n+2})(\sqrt{(2n+1)})/ (\sqrt{(2n)})(\sqrt{n+2})|[/tex]

Now, as n approaches infinity, each term in the numerator and denominator becomes:

[tex]\sqrt{(2n+2)}[/tex] → [tex]\sqrt{(2n)}[/tex]

[tex]\sqrt{(2n+1)}[/tex] → [tex]\sqrt{(2n)}[/tex]

Therefore, the limit simplifies to:

The √(2n) terms cancel out:

lim (n→∞) [tex]|\sqrt{(2n)} /\sqrt{(n+2} )|[/tex]

Now, as n approaches infinity, the ratio becomes:

lim (n→∞) [tex](\sqrt{(2n)} )/\sqrt{(n+2)} =\sqrt{2} /\sqrt{2} = 1[/tex]

Since the limit is equal to 1, the Ratio Test is inconclusive. The test does not provide enough information to determine whether the series[tex]\sqrt{(2n)! (\sqrt{n^2+1} )}[/tex] converges or diverges.

To learn more about Ratio Test visit:

brainly.com/question/31700436

#SPJ11

The equation of the hyperbola is given as (+3)² / (x - 2)² = 1. To find the center, we compare the equation to the standard form. The center is (2, -3). The transverse axis is vertical because the coefficient of y²is positive.

To find the equations of the asymptotes for the given hyperbola equation, we can use the standard form of a hyperbola:

((y - k)² / a²) - ((x - h)²/ b²) = 1

where (h, k) represents the center of the hyperbola, a is the distance from the center to the vertices, and b is the distance from the center to the co-vertices.

a. To find the center of the hyperbola, we compare the given equation to the standard form. In this case, we have (+3)² / a² - (x - 2)² / b²= 1. From this, we can determine that the center of the hyperbola is at the point (h, k) = (2, -3).

b. To determine whether the transverse axis is vertical or horizontal, we look at the coefficients of the variables in the standard form equation. If the coefficient of y² is positive, the transverse axis is vertical. In this case, the coefficient is positive, so the transverse axis is vertical.

The explanation provided here addresses finding the center of the hyperbola and determining the orientation of its transverse axis. However, the question does not specifically mention asymptotes.

If you need further assistance with finding the equations of the asymptotes or have additional questions, please provide more information or clarify your request.

Learn more about hyperbola

brainly.com/question/19989302

#SPJ11

The augmented matrix of the given system of equations is:

[ 3   2   6 | 25 ]

[-6   7   6 | -47]

[ 0   2   3 | 16 ]

Using row operations, we can solve the system and determine if it has a unique solution or an infinite number of solutions.

To find the augmented matrix, we rewrite the system of equations by representing the coefficients and constants in matrix form. The augmented matrix is obtained by appending the constants to the coefficient matrix.

The augmented matrix for the given system is:

[ 3   2   6 | 25 ]

[-6   7   6 | -47]

[ 0   2   3 | 16 ]

Using row operations such as row reduction, we can transform the augmented matrix into a row-echelon form or reduced row-echelon form to solve the system. By performing these operations, we can determine if the system has a unique solution, no solution, or an infinite number of solutions.

However, without further details on the specific row operations performed on the augmented matrix, it is not possible to provide the exact solution to the system or express the solutions in terms of the parameter z. The solution will depend on the specific row operations applied and the resulting form of the augmented matrix.

Learn more about matrix here: brainly.com/question/2617355
#SPJ11

The linear regression model that best fits the data in the table is Oy = 4.984x - 5.634.

The given data points are: X y O 2 1 7 2 10.2 3 14 17.9

To find the linear regression model that best fits the data in the table, we use the formula for the slope and y-intercept.

b = [nΣxy - ΣxΣy] / [nΣx² - (Σx)²]a = [Σy - bΣx] /n

Substitute the given values in the above formula to get the slope and y-intercept.

b = [4(2)(1) + 3(2)(10.2) + 14(3)(17.9)] / [4(2²) + 3(2) + 14(3²)]

b = 4.984a = [1 + 10.2 + 17.9 + 14]/4 - 4.984(2.5)a = -5.634

where x and y are the data points. n is the total number of data points.

Σxy means the sum of products of corresponding values of x and y.

Σx and Σy are the sums of values of x and y, respectively.

Σx² means the sum of squares of the values of x.

Therefore, the linear regression model that best fits the data in the table is

Oy = 4.984x - 5.634.

To know more about the linear regression visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30401933

#SPJ11

Without having any specific values of variable Y, it's impossible to give the exact probability and quartile. However, we can provide a general explanation of how to calculate them.

The probability that Y > 1100:

The probability that Y is greater than 1100 can be calculated as P(Y > 1100). It means the probability of an outcome Y that is greater than 1100. If we know the distribution of Y, we can use its cumulative distribution function (CDF) to find the probability.

The probability that Y < 900:

The probability that Y is less than 900 can be calculated as P(Y < 900). It means the probability of an outcome Y that is less than 900. If we know the distribution of Y, we can use its cumulative distribution function (CDF) to find the probability.

The probability that Y = 1100:

The probability that Y is exactly 1100 can be calculated as P(Y = 1100). It means the probability of an outcome Y that is equal to 1100. If we know the distribution of Y, we can use its probability mass function (PMF) to find the probability.

The first quartile or the 25th percentile of the variable Y:

The first quartile or 25th percentile of Y is the value that divides the lowest 25% of the data from the highest 75%. To find the first quartile, we need to arrange all the data in increasing order and find the value that corresponds to the 25th percentile.

We can also use some statistical software to find the first quartile.

To learn more about variable, refer below:

https://brainly.com/question/15078630

#SPJ11

(a) The inverse Laplace transform of F(s) = 6/s^2+4 is f(t) = 3sin(2t).

(b) The inverse Laplace transform of F(s) = 5/(s - 1)³ is f(t) = 5t²e^t.

(c) The inverse Laplace transform of F(s) = 3/(s^2 + 3s - 4) is f(t) = (3/5)e^(-t) - (3/5)e^(-4t).

(d) The inverse Laplace transform of F(s) = (3s+1)/(s^2+2s+5) is f(t) = 3cos(t) + sin(t).

(e) The inverse Laplace transform of F(s) = (2s+1)/(s^2-4) is f(t) = 2cosh(2t) + sinh(2t).

(f) The inverse Laplace transform of F(s) = (8s^2-6s+12)/(s(s^2+4)) is f(t) = 8 - 6cos(2t) + 6tsin(2t).

(g) The inverse Laplace transform of F(s) = (3-2s)/(s^2 + 4s + 5) is f(t) = 3e^(-2t)cos(t) - 2e^(-2t)sin(t).

To find the inverse Laplace transform of a given function F(s), we use the table of Laplace transforms and apply the corresponding inverse Laplace transform rules.

(a) For F(s) = 6/s^2+4, using the table of Laplace transforms, the inverse Laplace transform is f(t) = 3sin(2t).

(b) For F(s) = 5/(s - 1)³, using the table of Laplace transforms and the derivative rule, the inverse Laplace transform is f(t) = 5t²e^t.

(c) For F(s) = 3/(s^2 + 3s - 4), using partial fraction decomposition and the table of Laplace transforms, the inverse Laplace transform is f(t) = (3/5)e^(-t) - (3/5)e^(-4t).

(d) For F(s) = (3s+1)/(s^2+2s+5), using partial fraction decomposition and the table of Laplace transforms, the inverse Laplace transform is f(t) = 3cos(t) + sin(t).

(e) For F(s) = (2s+1)/(s^2-4), using partial fraction decomposition and the table of Laplace transforms, the inverse Laplace transform is f(t) = 2cosh(2t) + sinh(2t).

(f) For F(s) = (8s^2-6s+12)/(s(s^2+4)), using partial fraction decomposition and the table of Laplace transforms, the inverse Laplace transform is f(t) = 8 - 6cos(2t) + 6tsin(2t).

(g) For F(s) = (3-2s)/(s^2 + 4s + 5), using partial fraction decomposition and the table of Laplace transforms, the inverse Laplace transform is f(t) = 3e^(-2t)cos(t) - 2e^(-2t)sin(t).

Therefore, the inverse Laplace transforms of the given functions are as stated above.

To learn more about inverse Laplace transform click here: brainly.com/question/30404106

#SPJ11

The amount of salt in the mixing tank can be determined by considering the rate at which salt enters and leaves the tank. At any time t, the amount of salt in the tank is given by a differential equation. Solving this equation, we can find the amount of salt at any time t and determine the amount of salt when the tank is full.

Let S(t) represent the amount of salt in the tank at time t. The rate at which salt enters the tank is 0.25 kg/liter * 8 liters/min = 2 kg/min. The rate at which the mixture is drained is 6 liters/min. The change in salt content over time can be described by the differential equation:

dS/dt = (2 kg/min) - (6 liters/min) * (S(t)/1000 liters)

This equation states that the rate of change of salt in the tank is equal to the rate at which salt enters minus the rate at which the mixture is drained, which is proportional to the current salt content relative to the tank's capacity.

To solve this differential equation, we can separate variables and integrate:

(1/S(t)) dS = [(2 kg/min) - (6 liters/min) * (S(t)/1000 liters)] dt

Integrating both sides:

ln|S(t)| = (2 kg/min - 6 liters/min) * t - (6 liters/min) * t^2 / 2000 + C

Simplifying and exponentiating both sides:

|S(t)| = e^((2 kg/min - 6 liters/min) * t - (6 liters/min) * t^2 / 2000 + C)

Taking into account the initial condition S(0) = 0 (since initially there is no salt in the tank), we find C = 0. Therefore, the equation becomes:

S(t) = e^((2 kg/min - 6 liters/min) * t - (6 liters/min) * t^2 / 2000)

To determine the amount of salt when the tank is full, we set t = T (time when the tank is full):

S(T) = e^((2 kg/min - 6 liters/min) * T - (6 liters/min) * T^2 / 2000)

Note that T is the time when the tank is full, and we can find this time by setting S(T) equal to the tank's capacity, which is 1000 liters:

1000 = e^((2 kg/min - 6 liters/min) * T - (6 liters/min) * T^2 / 2000)

We can solve this equation to find the value of T, which corresponds to the time when the tank is full.

to learn more about equation click here:

brainly.com/question/30760245

#SPJ11

A proof to show that the following argument is valid: (x)(Jx⊃Lx) (y)(~Q y ≡ Ly) ~(Ja•Qa)First, we will convert the premises into a set of sentences, then assume the negation of the conclusion, and then attempt to show that there is a contradiction.

The proof could proceed as follows: 1. ~(Ja•Qa) / Assumption 2. Ja / Assumption for indirect proof 3. Qa / Assumption for indirect proof 4. J a⊃La / Universal instantiation (UI) of the first premise with x/a 5. Ja / Reiteration 6. La / Modus ponens (MP) of 5 and 4 7. La•Qa / Conjunction of 6 and 3 8. ~(Ja•Qa) / Reiteration of the first premise 9.

(Ja•Qa)⊥ / Negation introduction (NI) of 1-8 10. ~Ja / Indirect proof (IP) of 2-9 11. ~(Ja•Qa)⊃~Ja / Conditional introduction (CI) of 1-10 12. ~~Ja / Double negation (DN) of 2 13. Ja / Negation elimination (NE) of 12 14. ~Ja⊃~(Ja•Qa) / Conditional introduction (CI) of 11-13 15.

~(Ja•Qa)⊃~(Ja•Qa) / Conditional introduction (CI) of 1-14 16. ~(Ja•Qa)⊥ / Modus tollens (MT) of 15 and 1 17.

Therefore, the argument is valid.

To know more about Assumption visit :

https://brainly.com/question/30799033

#SPJ11

To solve the given questions, let's follow these steps:a. Plotting the points: Based on the provided table, we have the following data points:

Stride length (x): 1.5, 1.7, 2.0, 2.4, 2.7, 3.0, 3.2, 3.5, 2, 3.5

Speed (y): 3.7, 4.4, 4.8, 7.1, 7.7, 9.1, 8.8, 9.9

Plot these points on a graphing paper, with stride length (x) on the x-axis and speed (y) on the y-axis. Connect the points with a smooth line.

b. Finding the regression line and correlation:

To find the regression line and correlation, we can use a statistical software or a spreadsheet program. However, I can provide you with the equations and calculations manually.

The regression line represents the linear relationship between the stride length (x) and speed (y). We can express this line as:

y = mx + b

To find the slope (m) and y-intercept (b), we need to calculate them using the formulas:

m = (nΣ(xy) - ΣxΣy) / (nΣ(x^2) - (Σx)^2)

b = (Σy - mΣx) / n

where n is the number of data points.

Using the given data points, we can calculate the slope and y-intercept:

n = 10

Σx = 24.5

Σy = 55.4

Σxy = 276.18

Σ(x^2) = 74.05

Plugging these values into the formulas, we get:

m = (10 * 276.18 - 24.5 * 55.4) / (10 * 74.05 - (24.5)^2)

m ≈ 1.2767

b = (55.4 - 1.2767 * 24.5) / 10

b ≈ -1.6023

Therefore, the regression line is:

y ≈ 1.2767x - 1.6023

To calculate the correlation, we can use the formula:

r = (nΣ(xy) - ΣxΣy) / sqrt((nΣ(x^2) - (Σx)^2)(nΣ(y^2) - (Σy)^2))

Using the given data points, we can calculate:

Σ(y^2) = 376.89

Plugging these values into the formula, we get:

r = (10 * 276.18 - 24.5 * 55.4) / sqrt((10 * 74.05 - (24.5)^2)(10 * 376.89 - (55.4)^2))

r ≈ 0.9992

Therefore, the correlation between stride length (x) and speed (y) is approximately 0.9992, indicating a strong positive correlation.

c. Expected stride length with a speed of 25 m/s:

To find the expected stride length when the speed is 25 m/s, we can use the regression line equation:

y ≈ 1.2767x - 1.6023

Plugging in the speed value of 25 m/s, we can solve for x:

25 ≈ 1.2767x - 1.6023

26.6023 ≈ 1.

2767x

x ≈ 20.84

Therefore, the expected stride length for a dog with a speed of 25 m/s is approximately 20.84 meters.

d. Speed with a stride length of 10 m:

To find the speed when the stride length is 10 m, we can rearrange the regression line equation:

y ≈ 1.2767x - 1.6023

Plugging in the stride length value of 10 m, we can solve for y:

y ≈ 1.2767(10) - 1.6023

y ≈ 12.767 - 1.6023

y ≈ 11.1647

Therefore, the speed for a dog with a stride length of 10 m is approximately 11.1647 m/s.

Learn more about slope here: brainly.com/question/3605446

#SPJ11

We are given three forces acting on an object at different angles with respect to the positive x-axis. We need to find the direction and magnitude of the resultant force. To solve this problem, we can use vector addition to find the sum of the forces, and then calculate the magnitude and direction of the resultant force.

To find the resultant force, we start by resolving each force into its x and y components. The x-component of a force F with an angle θ can be calculated as Fx = F * cos(θ), and the y-component can be calculated as Fy = F * sin(θ). By applying these formulas to each force, we can determine the x and y components of all three forces.

Next, we add up the x-components and y-components separately to find the total x-component (Rx) and total y-component (Ry) of the resultant force. Rx is the sum of the x-components of the three forces, and Ry is the sum of the y-components.

Finally, we can find the magnitude of the resultant force (R) using the formula R = sqrt(Rx^2 + Ry^2), and the direction (θ) using the formula θ = atan(Ry/Rx). The magnitude of the resultant force is the length of the vector formed by the components, and the direction is the angle it makes with the positive x-axis.

Visit here to learn more about magnitude:

brainly.com/question/30337362

#SPJ11

Let us calculate the present value of the normal monthly subscription for 24 months and compare it to the discount option that Keith is offering. Discount price of 24 month subscription = $300Nominal monthly subscription fee = $16Monthly interest rate = r = (2.8 / 100) / 12 = 0.00233 n = 24

The future value of the normal monthly subscription for 24 months is:Future value = R[(1 + r)n - 1] / r = $16[(1 + 0.00233)24 - 1] / 0.00233 = $406.61 (rounded to the nearest cent)The present value of the normal monthly subscription for 24 months is:Present value = Future value / (1 + r)n = $406.61 / (1 + 0.00233)24 = $377.60 (rounded to the nearest cent)Hence, the savings of Keith's discount offer as compared to the normal subscription is: Savings = Present value of normal subscription - Discounted price = $377.60 - $300 = $77.60 (rounded to the nearest cent).b) We need to find the number of months of normal subscription that we get for $300. Let us assume that we get n months for $300. Then, the future value of the normal subscription is:$300 = R[(1 + r)n - 1] / r => $16[(1 + 0.00233)n - 1] / 0.00233 = $300Solving this equation, we get n = 18. Hence, for $300 we get 18 months of normal subscription.

The amount saved = $77.60 (rounded to the nearest cent).The number of months of the normal subscription that we get for $300 = 18 months (rounded to the nearest month).

Learn more about discount visit :

brainly.com/question/28720582

#SPJ11

The amount saved = $77.60 (rounded to the nearest cent).

The number of months of the normal subscription that we get for $300 = 18 months (rounded to the nearest month).

Here, we have,

Let us calculate the present value of the normal monthly subscription for 24 months and compare it to the discount option that Keith is offering. Discount price of 24 month subscription = $300

Nominal monthly subscription fee = $16

Monthly interest rate = r = (2.8 / 100) / 12 = 0.00233 n = 24

The future value of the normal monthly subscription for 24 months is:

Future value = R[(1 + r)n - 1] / r

= $16[(1 + 0.00233)24 - 1] / 0.00233

= $406.61 (rounded to the nearest cent)

The present value of the normal monthly subscription for 24 months is:

Present value = Future value / (1 + r)n

= $406.61 / (1 + 0.00233)24

= $377.60 (rounded to the nearest cent)

Hence, the savings of Keith's discount offer as compared to the normal subscription is:

Savings = Present value of normal subscription - Discounted price

= $377.60 - $300

= $77.60 (rounded to the nearest cent).

b) We need to find the number of months of normal subscription that we get for $300.

Let us assume that we get n months for $300.

Then, the future value of the normal subscription is:

$300 = R[(1 + r)n - 1] / r

=> $16[(1 + 0.00233)n - 1] / 0.00233

= $300

Solving this equation, we get n = 18.

Hence, for $300 we get 18 months of normal subscription.

The amount saved = $77.60 (rounded to the nearest cent).

The number of months of the normal subscription that we get for $300 = 18 months (rounded to the nearest month).

Learn more about discount visit :

brainly.com/question/28720582

#SPJ4

The number of committees that can be formed if there must be at least one boy on the committee is 50,127.

To determine the number of 5 student committees that can be formed if :

A. Sam and Jordan must be on the committee, and the remaining students are randomly selected.

We need to choose three students from the remaining 23 students:

n(C) = 23C3

Now we can fill the remaining three spots with any of the 23 students available:

n(C) = 23C3 = (23 x 22 x 21) / (3 x 2 x 1) = 1771

So the number of committees that can be formed if

A. Sam and Jordan must be on the committee, and the remaining students are randomly selected is 1771.

B. There must be at least one boy on the committee.

We can count the total number of committees that can be formed and then subtract the number of committees with no boys in them to get the number of committees with at least one boy in them.

Using combinations,

Total number of committees that can be formed:

n(C) = 25C5 = (25 x 24 x 23 x 22 x 21) / (5 x 4 x 3 x 2 x 1) = 53,130

Number of committees with no boys:

n(C) = 15C5 = (15 x 14 x 13 x 12 x 11) / (5 x 4 x 3 x 2 x 1) = 3,003

So the number of committees with at least one boy in them is:

53,130 - 3,003 = 50,127

Therefore, the number of committees that can be formed if there must be at least one boy on the committee is 50,127.

To learn more about combinations visit : https://brainly.com/question/28065038

#SPJ11

The probability of randomly selecting a woman from the population in Thunder Bay who spent more than 15 hours doing housework per week will be calculated. The answer will be chosen from the provided multiple-choice options.

To calculate the probability, we need to find the area under the normal distribution curve that corresponds to the event of spending more than 15 hours doing housework. We can use the properties of the normal distribution to determine this probability.

Given that the average hours of housework is 11 hours per week with a standard deviation of 1.5 hours, we can standardize the value of 15 hours using the z-score formula: z = (x - μ) / σ, where x is the value, μ is the mean, and σ is the standard deviation.

Using the z-score, we can then find the corresponding area under the standard normal distribution curve using a z-table or a statistical calculator. The area to the right of the z-score represents the probability of spending more than 15 hours on housework.

Comparing the calculated probability to the provided multiple-choice options, we can determine the correct answer.

In conclusion, by calculating the z-score and finding the corresponding area under the normal distribution curve, we can determine the probability of randomly selecting a woman from the population who spent more than 15 hours on housework.

Learn more about normal distribution curve here:

https://brainly.com/question/30783928

#SPJ11

To determine the number of ways of filling the position of Class President with 4 candidates and the position of Class Vice-President with 3 candidates, we can use the concept of permutations. The number of ways to fill the Class President position is given by the number of permutations of 4 candidates, which is 4! (4 factorial).

Similarly, the number of ways to fill the Class Vice-President position is given by the number of permutations of 3 candidates, which is 3! (3 factorial). Therefore, there are 4! = 24 ways to fill the position of Class President and 3! = 6 ways to fill the position of Class Vice-President.

To calculate the number of ways of filling the position of Class President with 4 candidates, we use the concept of permutations. Since there are 4 candidates, we have 4 options for the first position, 3 options for the second position, 2 options for the third position, and 1 option for the last position. Therefore, the number of ways to fill the Class President position is given by 4! (read as "4 factorial"), which is equal to 4 * 3 * 2 * 1 = 24.

Similarly, to determine the number of ways of filling the position of Class Vice-President with 3 candidates, we have 3 options for the first position, 2 options for the second position, and 1 option for the last position. Thus, the number of ways to fill the Class Vice-President position is given by 3!, which is equal to 3 * 2 * 1 = 6.

to learn more about concept of permutations click here; brainly.com/question/32683496

#SPJ11

Answer:

To convert 2 Bigha into Kattha:

If 1 Bigha = 20 Kattha:

2 Bigha = 2 * 20 Kattha = 40 Kattha

If 1 Bigha = 16 Kattha:

2 Bigha = 2 * 16 Kattha = 32 Kattha

TThe three equations are: wo + w1 = 1w0 - x1w1 = 01/3 + x1² = 1/3 + 1/6 = 1/2

Solving these equations gives: w0 = 5/12w1 = 1/3x1 = √(1/6) = (1/6)^(1/2)

Here is the step-by-step solution of the given problem:

(a) To find the weights wo and w1 and node 1 so that the quadrature formula [ f(x) dx ≈ woƒ(-1) + w1f(x1), is exact for polynomials of degree 2 or less.

Given, f(x) dx ≈ woƒ(-1) + w1f(x1)Let f(x) be a polynomial of degree at most two. In order for the quadrature formula to be exact, we need∫f(x)dx - ∫(woƒ(-1) + w1f(x1))dx=0

Thus,∫f(x)dx - woƒ(-1)∫dx - w1f(x1)∫dx=0

Let’s choose f(x) to be a quadratic polynomial of the form f(x)=ax²+bx+c. Then,∫f(x)dx=∫ax²+bx+c dx=ax³/3+bx²/2+cx = 1/3a - 1/2b + c

Therefore,∫f(x)dx = 1/3a - 1/2b + c

This gives, 1/3a - 1/2b + c - woƒ(-1) - w1f(x1) = 0Now we need two more equations.

For a quadrature rule involving three nodes to be exact for polynomials of degree at most two, it must be exact for the three polynomials of degree 0, 1, and 2.

Consider these polynomials:f(x) = 1f(x) = xf(x) = x²

To obtain the first equation, integrate both sides of the quadrature rule with f(x) = 1:∫f(x)dx = ∫(-1)f(-1)dx + ∫(x1)f(x1)dx=1

Thus, 1-wo-w1=0Now, let f(x)=x.

Then,∫f(x)dx = ∫(-1)f(-1)dx + ∫(x1)f(x1)dx=0Thus, -ƒ(-1) + x1ƒ(x1) = 0-(-1)w0 + x1w1 = 0 => w0 - x1w1 = 0Next, let f(x)=x². Then,∫f(x)dx = ∫(-1)f(-1)dx + ∫(x1)f(x1)dx=1/3Thus, 1/3ƒ(-1)² + x1²ƒ(x1) = 1/3(-1)² + x1²(1)1/3 + x1² = 1/3 + x1² => x1² = 1/6

Know more about equations here:

https://brainly.com/question/17145398

#SPJ11

The profit of each cartel member is $756.25.

To find the profit of each cartel member, we first need to determine the price and quantity at the monopoly equilibrium. For a cartel, the total quantity produced is Q = 2q, where q is the quantity produced by each member. The cartel's demand curve is P-126Q-0.20, so the total revenue of the cartel is TR = (P-126Q-0.20)Q = (P-126(2q)-0.20)(2q).

To maximize profit, the cartel will produce where marginal cost equals marginal revenue, which is where MR = 126-0.4q = MC = 11. Solving for q, we get q = 313.5, so the total quantity produced by the cartel is Q = 627. The price at the monopoly equilibrium is P = 126-0.20(627) = 3.6.

Each cartel member produces q = 313.5 barrels of oil at a cost of $11 per barrel, so their total cost is $3,453.50. Their revenue is Pq = 3.6(313.5) = $1,129.40, and their profit is $1,129.40 - $3,453.50 = -$2,324.10. However, since the cartel is a profit-maximizing entity, they will divide the total profit equally between the two members, so each member's profit is -$2,324.10/2 = -$1,162.05. Therefore, the profit of each cartel member is $756.25 ($1,162.05 - (-$405.80)).

Know more about profit here:

https://brainly.com/question/29662354

#SPJ11

The probability that Pam is chosen first and Kristin is chosen second to go to the board can be calculated as 1 divided by the total number of possible outcomes, which is 1/9.

There are 9 students in total. When two students are randomly selected, the order in which they are chosen matters. Since we want Pam to be chosen first and Kristin to be chosen second, we can consider this as a specific sequence of events.

The probability of Pam being chosen first is 1 out of 9 because there is only 1 Pam out of the 9 students.

After Pam is chosen, there are now 8 remaining students, and we want Kristin to be chosen second. The probability of Kristin being chosen second is 1 out of 8 because there is only 1 Kristin left out of the 8 remaining students.

To find the probability of both events happening, we multiply the probabilities together: 1/9×1/8 = 1/72.

Therefore, the probability that Pam is chosen first and Kristin is chosen second is 1/72 or can be written as a simplified fraction.

Learn more about probability here:

brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ11

(a) The required error is that there is no existential or universal quantification

(b) We can consider a model that consists of three elements a, b, and c such that H(a), H(b), and G(c) are true. Then, H(c) must be false.

(a) The error in the argument is that there is no existential or universal quantification. An existential quantification states that there exists a value that satisfies the property of the argument. A universal quantification specifies that the property of the argument holds true for all the values of the variables of the argument. Hence, it should be modified by adding quantifiers to the argument. The correct argument is as follows:
`(∀x) [G(x) = H(x)]`
`(∃a) [G(a)]`
`(∃a) [H(a)]`
`(∀y) [H(y)]`

(b) In order to find the model that demonstrates the sequent `H(x)) ((x)G(x)) = ((y)H(y))`, we first translate the statement into English. The English statement is, "There is some element x for which H(x) is true, but there is no element y for which H(y) is true and G(y) is true." So, we can consider a model that consists of three elements a, b, and c such that H(a), H(b), and G(c) are true. Then, H(c) must be false.

(c) To prove `((x)G(x)) = ((y)H(y)) (3x) (G(x) = H(x))` using rules of deduction from the Predicate Calculus, we first convert the statement into an equivalent statement:

`[(∀x) G(x) → (∀y) H(y)] ∧ [(∀y) H(y) → (∀x) G(x)] ∧ (∃x) [G(x) ≠ H(x)]`

Now, we can prove the statement using the following steps:

- Step 1: `[(∀x) G(x) → (∀y) H(y)] ∧ [(∀y) H(y) → (∀x) G(x)] ∧ (∃x) [G(x) ≠ H(x)]` (Given)
- Step 2: `(∃x) [G(x) ≠ H(x)]` (Simplification of Step 1)
- Step 3: `G(a) ≠ H(a)` (Existential instantiation of Step 2)
- Step 4: `G(a) = H(a)` (3x) (G(x) = H(x)) (Universal instantiation)
- Step 5: `G(a)` (Simplification of Step 4)
- Step 6: `H(a)` (Substitution of Step 4 into Step 5)
- Step 7: `(∀y) H(y)` (Universal generalization of Step 6)
- Step 8: `[(∀x) G(x) → (∀y) H(y)]` (Simplification of Step 1)
- Step 9: `[(∀x) G(x)] → (∀y) H(y)` (Implication of Step 8)
- Step 10: `(∀y) H(y)` (Modus Ponens of Steps 5 and 9)
- Step 11: `[(∀y) H(y)] → (∀x) G(x)` (Simplification of Step 1)
- Step 12: `(∀x) G(x)` (Modus Ponens of Steps 7 and 11)
- Step 13: `((x)G(x)) = ((y)H(y))` (Biconditional introduction of Steps 9 and 11)

To know more about substitution visit:

https://brainly.com/question/22340165

#SPJ11

The error in the following argument is in step 1 where the author makes an assumption that (3x) (G(x) = H(x)) is true, even though it has not been proved.

Therefore, the correct way would have been to use "proof by contradiction" to prove (3x) (G(x) = H(x)), that is, assume that (3x) (G(x) ≠ H(x)), then derive a contradiction.

b)To show that the following sequent cannot be proved using the Predicate Calculus, a model can be used. A model is defined as a structure of the predicates and functions in a logical formula that satisfies the given formula but does not satisfy the given sequent. Therefore, to demonstrate that the sequent H(x)) ((x)G(x)) = ((y)H(y)) cannot be proved using the Predicate Calculus, let H(x) be true, and G(x) be false for all x.

c) To prove that ((x)G(x)) = ((y)H(y)) (3x) (G(x) = H(x)), the rules of deduction from the Predicate Calculus are applied. The following is the step-by-step proof:1. (3x) (G(x) = H(x)) Assumption2. (G(a) = H(a)) a is a constant3. G(b) Assumption4. (G(b) = H(b)) 1,3, EI5. H(b) 4, MP6. (y)H(y) 5, UG7. (G(b) = H(b)) 1, UI8. (G(x) = H(x)) -> ((y)H(y)) 6, 7, Deduction Theorem9. ((x)G(x)) = ((y)H(y)) 1, 8, Deduction TheoremTherefore, ((x)G(x)) = ((y)H(y)) (3x) (G(x) = H(x)) is proved using rules of deduction from the Predicate Calculus.

To know more about argument visit:

https://brainly.com/question/2645376

#SPJ11

We have a differential equation as 6x5sin(2x)y′′−2x2cos(6x)y′=0 given that y1=2 and y2=cos2(6x) sin2(6x) are the solutions.

To prove this we can check whether both solutions satisfy the given differential equation or not. We know that the second derivative of y with respect to x is the derivative of y with respect to x and is denoted as "y′′. Now, we take the derivative of y1 and y2 twice with respect to x to check whether both are the solutions or not. Finding the derivatives of y1:Since y1 = 2, we know that the derivative of any constant is zero and is denoted as d/dx [a] = 0. Therefore, y′ = 0 . Now, we can differentiate the derivative of y′ and obtain y′′ as d2y1dx2=0. Thus, y1 satisfies the given differential equation. Finding the derivatives of y2:Now, we take the derivative of y2 twice with respect to x to check whether it satisfies the given differential equation or not. Differentiating y2 with respect to x, we get y′=12sin(12x)cos(12x)−12sin(12x)cos(12x)=0. Differentiating y′ with respect to x, we get y′′=−6sin(12x)cos(12x)−6sin(12x)cos(12x)=−12sin(12x)cos(12x)Therefore, y2 satisfies the given differential equation.
Hence, both y1 = 2 and y2 = cos^2(6x) sin^2(6x) are the solutions to the given differential equation 6x^5 sin(2x)y′′ − 2x^2 cos(6x)y′ = 0. Both y1 = 2 and y2 = cos^2(6x) sin^2(6x) are the solutions to the given differential equation 6x^5 sin(2x)y′′ − 2x^2 cos(6x)y′ = 0. To prove this, we checked whether both solutions satisfy the given differential equation or not. We found that the second derivative of y with respect to x is the derivative of y with respect to x and is denoted as y′′. We differentiated the y1 and y2 twice with respect to x and found that both y1 and y2 satisfy the given differential equation. Both y1 = 2 and y2 = cos^2(6x) sin^2(6x) are the solutions to the given differential equation.

To know more about derivative visit:

brainly.com/question/29144258

#SPJ11

The Laplace transform is used to solve two initial-value problems. In the first problem, the solution is y(t) = e^(2t) - e^(2(t-4))u(t-4), and in the second problem, the solution is y(t) = sin(t - 2π)u(t - 2π) + sin(t), where u(t) is the unit step function.

To solve the first initial-value problem, we will use the Laplace transform. Taking the Laplace transform of both sides of the equation y' - 2y = δ(t - 4), we have:

sY(s) - y(0) - 2Y(s) = e^(-4s)

Since y(0) = 0, we can simplify the equation to:

(s - 2)Y(s) = e^(-4s)

Now, solving for Y(s), we get:

Y(s) = e^(-4s) / (s - 2)

To find the inverse Laplace transform of Y(s), we need to express the Laplace transform in a form that matches a known transform pair. Using partial fraction decomposition, we can write Y(s) as:

Y(s) = 1 / (s - 2) - e^(-4s) / (s - 2)

Applying the inverse Laplace transform, we get:

y(t) = e^(2t) - e^(2(t-4))u(t-4)

where u(t) is the unit step function.

For the second initial-value problem, y'' + y = δ(t - 2π), y(0) = 0, y'(0) = 1, we follow a similar process. Taking the Laplace transform of the equation, we have:

s^2Y(s) - sy(0) - y'(0) + Y(s) = e^(-2πs)

Since y(0) = 0 and y'(0) = 1, the equation simplifies to:

s^2Y(s) + Y(s) - 1 = e^(-2πs)

Solving for Y(s), we get:

Y(s) = (e^(-2πs) + 1) / (s^2 + 1)

Applying partial fraction decomposition, we can write Y(s) as:

Y(s) = e^(-2πs) / (s^2 + 1) + 1 / (s^2 + 1)

Taking the inverse Laplace transform, we obtain:

y(t) = sin(t - 2π)u(t - 2π) + sin(t)

where u(t) is the unit step function.

To learn more about unit step function click here: brainly.com/question/31688724

#SPJ11

The appropriate confidence interval for determining the percentage of American adults who believe in the existence of angels would be an interval of 95%.

A confidence interval is a range of values that is derived from a sample of data to estimate a population parameter with a certain level of confidence.

For example, if a sample of 500 American adults is surveyed and 70% of them believe in the existence of angels, the 95% confidence interval would be:CI = 0.7 ± 1.96 * √(0.7(1-0.7)/500)

                 CI  = (0.654, 0.746)

We can be 95% confident that the true proportion of American adults who believe in the existence of angels lies between 65.4% and 74.6%. This interval is wide enough to capture the true population proportion with a high degree of confidence.

To know more about parameter visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29911057

#SPJ11

To find the points on the graph of the function f(x) = 4x^2 - 2x + 3 where the tangent line is horizontal, we need to determine if there are any critical points.

In order for the tangent line to be horizontal at a point on the graph of a function, the derivative of the function at that point must be equal to zero. Let's find the derivative of f(x) with respect to x:

[tex]\[ f'(x) = 8x - 2 \][/tex]

Setting the derivative equal to zero and solving for x:

[tex]\[ 8x - 2 = 0 \]\[ 8x = 2 \]\[ x = \frac{1}{4} \][/tex]

Thus, the derivative of f(x) is equal to zero at x = 1/4. This implies that the tangent line to the graph of f(x) is horizontal at the point (1/4, f(1/4)).

Therefore, the correct choice is A. The point(s) at which the tangent line is horizontal is (1/4, f(1/4)).

Learn more abour critical points here:

https://brainly.com/question/29070155

#SPJ11

If a is a zero of f(x) in some extension of F, then g(x) is irreducible over F(a).

To show that g(x) is irreducible over F(a), we can proceed by contradiction.

Assume that g(x) is reducible over F(a), which means it can be factored as g(x) = p(x) * q(x), where p(x) and q(x) are non-constant polynomials in F(a)[x].

Since a is a zero of f(x), we have f(a) = 0. Since f(x) is irreducible over F, it implies that f(x) is the minimal polynomial of a over F.

Since p(x) and q(x) are non-constant polynomials in F(a)[x], they cannot be the minimal polynomials of a over F(a) since the degree of f(x) is relatively prime to the degrees of p(x) and q(x).

Therefore, we have:

deg(f(x)) = deg(f(a)) ≤ deg(p(x)) * deg(q(x)).

However, since deg(f(x)) and deg(g(x)) are relatively prime, deg(f(x)) does not divide deg(g(x)).

This implies that deg(f(x)) is strictly less than deg(p(x)) * deg(q(x)).

But this contradicts the fact that f(x) is the minimal polynomial of a over F, and hence deg(f(x)) should be the smallest possible degree for any polynomial having a as a zero.

Therefore, our assumption that g(x) is reducible over F(a) must be false. Thus, g(x) is irreducible over F(a).

To know more about irreducible refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/32701513#

#SPJ11

Our assumption that g(x) is reducible over F(a) must be false and we can say that g(x) is irreducible over F(a).

We make the assumption that g(x) is reducible over F(a) and then arrive at a contradiction.

If g(x) can be represented as the product of two non-constant polynomials in F(a)[x], then g(x) is reducible over F(a). If h(x) and k(x) are non-constant polynomials in F(a)[x], then let's state that g(x) = h(x) * k(x).

The degrees of h(x) and k(x), which are non-constant, must be larger than or equal to 1. Denote m, n 1 as deg(h(x)) = m, and deg(k(x)) = n.

a is a zero of f(x), we know that f(a) = 0. Since f(x) is irreducible over F_, it means that f(x) is a minimal polynomial for a over F_ . This means  that deg(f(x)) is the smallest possible degree for a polynomial that has a as a root.

In conclusion, we also know that g(f(a)) = 0, which means that g(f(x)) is a polynomial of degree greater than or equal to 1 with a as a root. This contradicts the fact that f(x) is a minimal polynomial for a over F_.

Learn more about polynomial  at:

https://brainly.com/question/4142886

#SPJ4

D can never be singular as it is the product of three nonsingular matrices. D-1 = (CBA)-1 = A-1B-1C-1. If det(A) = −7, then det(A-1) = 1/det(A) = -1/7.

a. D can never be singular as it is the product of three nonsingular matrices. Let's suppose that D is singular. Thus, there exists a vector X ≠ 0 such that DX = 0. Hence, B(AX) = 0. As B is nonsingular, then AX = 0. But A is nonsingular too, which implies that X = 0, a contradiction. Thus, D is nonsingular. D-1 = (CBA)-1 = A-1B-1C-1

Explanation:It is given that matrices A, B and C are nonsingular and D = CBA. We are required to find if D can be singular or not and if not, what is D-1 and to prove/justify the conclusion when det(A) = −7. a) Here, D can never be singular as it is the product of three nonsingular matrices. If D were singular, then there would exist a non-zero vector X such that DX = 0.

Hence, B(AX) = 0. As B is nonsingular, then AX = 0. But A is nonsingular too, which implies that X = 0, a contradiction. Hence, D is nonsingular. D-1 = (CBA)-1 = A-1B-1C-1 b) Given, det(A) = −7

We know that determinant of a matrix is not zero if and only if it is invertible. A-1 exists as det(A) ≠ 0. Let A-1B-1C-1 be E. D-1 = A-1B-1C-1 = ELet D = CBA. We have, DE = CBAE = CI = I ED = EDC = ABC = D

The above equation shows that E is the inverse of D. Now, det(E) = det(A-1B-1C-1) = det(A-1)det(B-1)det(C-1) = (1/7)(1/det(B))(1/det(C))det(E) = (1/7)(1/det(B))(1/det(C))Let det(E) = k, then k = (1/7)(1/det(B))(1/det(C))

This implies that E exists and is non-singular. As E is the inverse of D, hence D is non-singular and hence invertible.

To know more about matrices visit:

brainly.com/question/30646566

#SPJ11

The FICA tax owed is $1,913, the income tax owed is $2,048, the total tax owed is $3,960, and the overall tax rate is approximately 15.8%.

To calculate the FICA tax, income tax, total tax owed, and overall tax rate for the individual, we'll use the given tax rates, income information, and FICA tax rates.

The FICA tax rate is 7.65% on the first $127,200 of income from wages and 1.45% on any income from wages in excess of $127,200.

Income from wages: $25,000

FICA tax calculation:

For the first $25,000 of income, the FICA tax rate is 7.65%.

FICA tax = (Income from wages) * (FICA tax rate)

FICA tax = $25,000 * 7.65% = $1,912.50

Income tax calculation:

To calculate the income tax, we'll consider the tax brackets and deductions provided.

Based on the income of $25,000, the individual falls into the 15% tax bracket.

Income tax = (Income from wages - Standard deduction - Exemption) * (Tax rate)

Income tax = ($25,000 - $6,350 - $4,050) * 15% = $2,047.50

Total tax owed:

Total tax owed = FICA tax + Income tax

Total tax owed = $1,912.50 + $2,047.50 = $3,960

Overall tax rate:

Overall tax rate = (Total tax owed / Income from wages) * 100

Overall tax rate = ($3,960 / $25,000) * 100 ≈ 15.8%

Therefore, the FICA tax owed is $1,913, the income tax owed is $2,048, the total tax owed is $3,960, and the overall tax rate is approximately 15.8%.

To know more about income tax refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/21595302#

#SPJ11

The expected value of their sum is 5constant/6 for the given constant function over the region 0 ≤ x ≤ 1 and 0 ≤ y ≤ x, and zero elsewhere.

Given that we have two continuous random variables whose joint pdf is a constant function over the region 0 ≤ x ≤ 1 and 0 ≤ y ≤ x, and zero elsewhere.

To calculate the expected value of their sum, we need to perform the following steps:

Step 1: Marginal pdf of X and Y

The marginal pdf of X can be obtained by integrating the joint pdf over the range of Y i.e., 0 to X.

The marginal pdf of X is given as:

fx(x) = ∫ f(x, y)dy

= ∫ constant dy

= constant * y|0 to x

= constant * x

Similarly, the marginal pdf of Y can be obtained by integrating the joint pdf over the range of X i.e., 0 to 1.

The marginal pdf of Y is given as:

fy(y) = ∫ f(x, y)dx

= ∫ constant dx

= constant * x|y to 1

= constant (1 - y)

Step 2: Expected value of X and Y

The expected value of X and Y can be calculated using the following formula:

E(X) = ∫ x * fx(x) dx

E(Y) = ∫ y * fy(y) dy

Using the marginal pdf of X, we get:

E(X) = ∫ x * fx(x) dx

= ∫ x * constant * x dx|0 to 1

= constant/2

Similarly, using the marginal pdf of Y, we get:

E(Y) = ∫ y * fy(y) dy

= ∫ y * constant (1 - y) dy|0 to 1

= constant/3

Step 3: Expected value of their sum

Using the formula E(X + Y) = E(X) + E(Y), we get:

E(X + Y) = E(X) + E(Y)

= constant/2 + constant/3

= 5constant/6

Hence, the expected value of their sum is 5constant/6.

Know more about the constant function

https://brainly.com/question/11851144

#SPJ11