Please answer and show work, have a blessed day!

One way to simplify variables with many levels (or decimal places) when creating a frequency distribution is to organize the data into class intervals (option B).

By grouping the data into intervals, the frequency distribution becomes more manageable and easier to interpret. This process involves dividing the range of values into distinct intervals or categories and then counting the number of observations falling within each interval. Class intervals provide a summary of the data by grouping similar values together, reducing the complexity of individual levels or decimal places.

This simplification technique is particularly useful when dealing with large datasets or continuous variables that have numerous levels or decimal values, allowing for a clearer representation and analysis of the data.

Option B holds true.

Learn more about frequency distribution: https://brainly.com/question/27820465

#SPJ11

Using a standard normal distribution table, we can find the p-value associated with this test statistic, which is extremely small (less than 0.0001). This means that if the true fraction defective is indeed 0.05 or less, the probability of getting a sample proportion of 0.02 or less is very low.

Since the p-value is less than the significance level of alpha = 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the process is not capable at the customer's required level of quality. The manufacturer cannot demonstrate process capability for the customer based on this sample.

To determine if the manufacturer can demonstrate process capability for the customer, we need to perform a hypothesis test.

The null hypothesis is that the true fraction defective in the population is equal to or less than 0.05 (i.e., the process is capable), while the alternative hypothesis is that the true fraction defective is greater than 0.05 (i.e., the process is not capable).

Using the given sample size of 200 and 4 defects, we can calculate the sample proportion of defects as 0.02. We can then use this to calculate the test statistic, which in this case is a one-sample proportion z-test:

z = (p - P) / sqrt(P(1-P) / n)

where p is the sample proportion, P is the hypothesized proportion (0.05), and n is the sample size. Plugging in the values, we get:

z = (0.02 - 0.05) / sqrt(0.05(1-0.05) / 200) = -4.4

Know more about hypothesis test here:

https://brainly.com/question/30588452

#SPJ11

The probability that a senator is under 70 years old given that he or she is at least 50 years old is 0.75.

To answer this question, we need to use conditional probability. Let A be the event that a senator is under 70 years old, and let B be the event that a senator is at least 50 years old. We want to find the probability of A given B, denoted as P(A|B).

Using Bayes' theorem, we have:

P(A|B) = P(B|A) * P(A) / P(B)

where P(B|A) is the probability that a senator is at least 50 years old given that they are under 70 years old (which is 1), P(A) is the probability that a senator is under 70 years old (which we do not know yet), and P(B) is the probability that a senator is at least 50 years old (which we also do not know yet).

To find P(A), we need more information. Let's assume that we know the following:

The total number of senators is 100.

The number of senators who are under 70 years old is 60.

The number of senators who are at least 50 years old is 80.

Using this information, we can calculate P(A) and P(B) as follows:

P(A) = number of senators under 70 / total number of senators = 60/100 = 0.6

P(B) = number of senators at least 50 / total number of senators = 80/100 = 0.8

Now we can plug these values into Bayes' theorem:

P(A|B) = P(B|A) * P(A) / P(B)

P(A|B) = 1 * 0.6 / 0.8

P(A|B) = 0.75

Therefore, the probability that a senator is under 70 years old given that he or she is at least 50 years old is 0.75.

Learn more about probability

brainly.com/question/11234923

#SPJ11

A) True.  creating a rectangle in ANSYS geometry step will have an impact on the mathematical model.

In a boundary value problem, the governing equations describe the physics of the problem and how the system behaves. These equations are typically written in terms of the dependent variables, such as temperature, pressure, or velocity, and their derivatives with respect to time and space. The domain refers to the region of space where the equations are valid and the solution is sought. The boundary conditions specify the values of the dependent variables or their derivatives at the boundaries of the domain.

When we create a rectangle in ANSYS geometry, we are defining the shape and size of the domain for the problem we want to solve. This domain will be used to apply the governing equations and boundary conditions, and it affects the solution obtained from the ANSYS solver. For example, if we are modeling heat transfer in a rectangular block, the size and shape of the block will affect the heat transfer rate and temperature distribution within the block.

Therefore, the geometry we create in ANSYS directly affects the mathematical model, as it defines the domain and, as a result, affects the governing equations and boundary conditions applied to that domain. Any changes made to the geometry will alter the mathematical model and the resulting solution from the ANSYS solver.

Visit to know more about Geometry:-

brainly.com/question/19241268

#SPJ11

The perimeter of the rectangle is 13.30 units

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

(-2 , -2), (1, -1.5) and (-1, 1.5)

The side lengths are calculated using

Lentghs = √[(x2 - x1)² + (y2 - y1)²]

So, we have

Lentgh 1 = √[(-2 - 1)² + (-2 + 1.5)²] = 3.04

Lentgh 2 = √[(1 + 1)² + (-1.5 - 1.5)²] = 3.61

So, we have

PErimeter = 2 * (3.04 + 3.61)

Evaluate

PErimeter = 13.30

Hence, the perimeter is 13.30

Read more about perimeter at

https://brainly.com/question/17297081

#SPJ1

The perimeter of the rectangle is  6*√10  units

We need to find the lengths of the two sides of the rectangle.

For the top side (the shorter one) this is an hypotenuse of a right triangle with sides of 3 and 1, then it measures:

L = √(3² + 1²) = √10

The lateral side measures:

L' = √(2² + 6²) = √40 = 2√10

Then the perimeter is:

P = 2*(√10 + 2√10)

P = 6*√10

LEarn more about perimeter at.

https://brainly.com/question/24571594

#SPJ1

The null hypothesis is that the true average age of the sporting goods store's customers is equal to or less than 39. The alternative hypothesis is that the true average age is greater than 39.

To test this hypothesis, we can use a one-sample t-test. The t-statistic for this sample is (41.3-39)/(7/sqrt(43)) = 3.06. With 42 degrees of freedom (43-1), the critical value for a one-tailed test with alpha=0.10 is 1.684. Since 3.06 > 1.684, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is evidence to suggest that the true average age of the store's customers is greater than 39.

Know more about null hypothesis here:

https://brainly.com/question/28920252

#SPJ11

Answer: hortest side of the triangle is 24 units.

Step-by-step explanation: To solve for the shortest side of a triangle, we first need to simplify the given equation:

s + s + 8 - 18 = 38

Combining like terms, we get:

2s - 10 = 38

Adding 10 to both sides, we get:

2s = 48

Dividing by 2, we get:

s = 24

Therefore, the value of the shortest side of the triangle is 24 units.

The value of tanC is 7/24

Trigonometric Ratios are defined as the values of all the trigonometric functions based on the value of the ratio of sides in a right-angled triangle.

Sin(tetha) = opp/hyp

cos(tetha) = adj/hyp

tan(tetha) = opp/adj

Using Pythagoras theorem, we need to find the adjascent to angle C

adj = √ 50²-14²

adj = √(2500-196)

adj = √ 2304

adj = 48

Therefore tanC = 14/48

= 7/24

therefore the value of tanC = 7/24

learn more about trigonometric ratio from

https://brainly.com/question/24349828

#SPJ1

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Oh i see why i got 10 down wrong.  It says divide.  I was adding.

I will edit to add.

10 down is:   x+3

In order to determine which model is preferred, we need to take into account the significance of the independent variables and the overall fit of the model. It is important to note that having a differing number of independent variables does not necessarily mean one model is better than the other.

Firstly, we need to analyze the significance of the independent variables in both models. A variable is considered significant if it has a p-value less than 0.05. If one model has more significant variables than the other, it may be preferred. However, if both models have similar levels of significance, we need to look at the overall fit of the model.

One way to assess the overall fit of the model is to look at the R-squared value. This value indicates the proportion of variation in the dependent variable that can be explained by the independent variables. A higher R-squared value indicates a better fit. However, this value should be interpreted in the context of the specific problem and should not be used as the sole determinant of model preference.

In addition, other factors such as the complexity of the model and the interpretability of the results should also be considered when deciding which model is preferred.

Therefore, the answer to the question of which model is preferred cannot be determined solely based on the fact that the two models have a differing number of independent variables. It requires a thorough analysis of the significance of the independent variables, the overall fit of the model, and other relevant factors.

Learn more about model  here:

https://brainly.com/question/28713017

#SPJ11

Answer:1,703,520

Step-by-step explanation:

26 x 14 x 26 x 180

The test statistic for a sample with correlation coefficient r = 0.5 and sample size n = 30 is 3.06.

To test whether a correlation is significant, we need to calculate the test statistic using the correlation coefficient (r) and the sample size (n). The formula for the test statistic is:

t = r * sqrt(n-2) / sqrt(1-r^2)
Here, r is the correlation coefficient (0.5) and n is the sample size (30).
Plugging in the given values of r = 0.5 and n = 30, we get:

t = 0.5 * √((30 - 2) / (1 - 0.5^2))
t = 0.5 * √(28 / 0.75)
t = 0.5 * √(37.33)
t = 0.5 * 6.11
t ≈ 3.06

Thus, the test statistic for this sample is approximately 3.06. To determine whether the correlation is significant, we would need to compare this test statistic to a critical value from a t-distribution with n-2 degrees of freedom at the desired significance level.

To learn more about coefficients visit;

https://brainly.com/question/28975079

#SPJ11

To solve this problem, we need to use the formula for calculating the class average:

average = (sum of all scores) / number of scores

Currently, we know that the class average is 70 and that the instructor has graded 19 papers. This means that the sum of all scores so far is:

sum of all scores = 70 * 19 = 1330

To raise the class average by 1 point, we need to find out what the sum of all scores would be if the last paper had a score that was 1 point higher than the current average. Let's call this score "x".

sum of all scores + x = 20 * 71

1330 + x = 1420

x = 90

Therefore, the score on the last paper would have to be 90 in order to raise the class average by 1 point.

To raise the class average by 2 points, we would use the same formula, but this time we would add 2 points to the current average:

sum of all scores + x = 20 * 72

1330 + x = 1440

x = 110

Therefore, the score on the last paper would have to be 110 in order to raise the class average by 2 points.

It's important to note that these scores are the maximum possible scores on the last paper that would raise the class average by the specified number of points. It's possible that the score on the last paper could be lower and still raise the class average by 1 or 2 points, depending on the exact values of the other scores.

Learn more about average here:

https://brainly.com/question/24057012

#SPJ11

The value of f ( -1 ) when evaluated is C. 1

The value of f ( - 4 ) would be A. -2

The value of x would be B. 1.7.

The question asking to evaluate f ( -1  ) is basically asking for the value of y, when the line on the graph is at the value of x in the bracket. The value of y at - 1 is 1. By this same notion, the value of y when x is - 4, according to the graph, is - 2.

The value of x however, when given f (x) = 3 would then be the value on the graph, when y is 3. We can see that this value is 1. 7.

Find out more on graphs at https://brainly.com/question/24495196

#SPJ1

The value of the variable x is 13

To determine the value, we need to take note of the different properties of  a triangle.

Some properties of a triangle includes;

From the information given, we have the angles of the triangle as;

m<K = 8x - 29

m<L = 3x - 1

m<J = 6x - 11

Now, equate the angles, we have;

m<K +m<L + m<J = 180

8x - 29 + 3x - 1 + 6x - 11 = 180

collect the like terms

8x + 3x + 6x = 180 + 41

add the values

17x = 221

Make 'x' the subject

x = 13

Learn about triangles at: https://brainly.com/question/1058720

#SPJ1

B. The statement is false. The transpose of the product of two matrices is the product of the transposes of the individual matrices in reverse order, or (AB)^T=B^TA^T.

Justification:
1. Let A and B be arbitrary matrices for which the product AB is defined.
2. To find the transpose of the product (AB)^T, we need to first understand the properties of transposes.
3. According to the property of transposes, (AB)^T is equal to the product of the transposes of the individual matrices in reverse order.
4. So, (AB)^T = B^TA^T, which contradicts the statement (AB)^T = A^TB^T.

Hence, the correct answer is option B.

Learn more about Matrices here: brainly.com/question/11367104

#SPJ11

Answer: The data set has a mode of $2.55.

The data set has a median of $2.91.

The data set has a mean that is less than the median.

Step-by-step explanation:

For having to pay the same amount for both memberships and walk-in classes, if memberships cost $51 per month for unlimited classes and walk-ins charge $3 per class, one has to attend classes and pay $51 as the total amount.

Let the number of classes that are attended be x

If the same amount is paid for unlimited membership classes and walk=in classes, then we get the following equation:

Membership cost = cost of walk-in classes = $51

Cost of walk-in classes = 3x

Thus, we get the following equation.

51 = 3x

x = 17

Thus, the number of classes attended is 17 and the final amount paid is $51.

Learn more about equations:

https://brainly.com/question/28871326

#SPJ4

Solving a system of equations we can see that the two positive numbers are x = 10 and y = 5.

Let's say that the two numbers are x and y, then we can write the system of equations:

x² + y² = 125

x² - y² = 75

We can isolate x² in the second equation to get:

x² = 75 + y²

And replace that in the first one, then:

75 + y² + y² = 125

2y² = 125 - 75

2y² = 50

y² = 50/2

y² = 25

y = √25 = 5

And now let's find the value of x:

x² = 75 + y²

x² = 75 + 25

x² = 100

x = √100 = 10

These are the two numbers.

Learn moer about systems of equations at:

https://brainly.com/question/13729904

#SPJ1

The margin of error for the 90% confidence interval is 5.84

To find the margin of error for a 90% confidence interval, we will use the given information and the z-score table provided.

1. Identify the z-score for a 90% confidence level: Since the confidence level is 90%, there is 10% left in the tails. Divide this by 2 to find the area in each tail, which is 5%. Look for the z-score associated with 0.05 in the table provided. The z-score is 1.645.

2. Find the standard error: The standard error is calculated as the population standard deviation (σ) divided by the square root of the sample size (n). In this case, σ = 21 and n = 35.

Standard Error (SE) = σ / √n = 21 / √35 ≈ 3.55

3. Calculate the margin of error: The margin of error (ME) is calculated by multiplying the z-score by the standard error.

ME = z-score * SE = 1.645 * 3.55 ≈ 5.84

4. Round the final answer to two decimal places: 5.84

To learn more about standard deviation : brainly.com/question/13905583

#SPJ11

.

The other end point of the line segment is (-11, 6)

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

Midpoint = (-4, 7)

Endpoint 1 = (3, 8)

Represent the other point with (x, y)

using the above as a guide, we have the following:

Midpoint = 1/2(x1 + x2, y1 + y2)

So, we have

1/2(x + 3, y + 8) = (-4, 7)

This gives

(x + 3, y + 8) = (-8, 14)

Evaluate

(x, y) = (-11, 6)

Hence, the other point is (-11, 6)

Read more about midpoint at

https://brainly.com/question/25886396

#SPJ1

To test these hypotheses, you would gather a random sample of this year's entering students, calculate their mean IQ, and compare it to the historical mean IQ of previous years. Then, using a suitable statistical test like a t-test, you would determine if there's enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis, thus supporting the professor's claim.

The null hypothesis (H0) for this hypothesis test would be that there is no difference in mean IQ scores between this year's entering students and entering students from previous years. The alternative hypothesis (Ha) would be that this year's entering students have a higher mean IQ score than entering students from previous years.

Symbolically, we can represent the hypotheses as follows:

H0: μ = μ0 (where μ is the population mean IQ score for this year's entering students and μ0 is the mean IQ score for entering students from previous years)

Ha: μ > μ0 (where μ is the population mean IQ score for this year's entering students and μ0 is the mean IQ score for entering students from previous years)

To test these hypotheses, we would need to collect a random sample of this year's entering students and calculate their mean IQ score. We would then use statistical tests such as a t-test or a z-test to determine the likelihood of observing this sample mean if the null hypothesis were true. If the sample mean is significantly higher than the mean for entering students from previous years, we would reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis and conclude that this year's entering students do indeed appear to be smarter.

To conduct a hypothesis test for the claim that this year's entering students have higher IQ scores than previous years, we would use the following null hypothesis (H0) and alternative hypothesis (H1):

Null hypothesis (H0): There is no significant difference in the mean IQ scores of this year's entering students and those from previous years. In other words, the mean IQ for this year's students (μ) is equal to the mean IQ for previous years (μ₀).

H0: μ = μ₀

Alternative hypothesis (H1): This year's entering students have a significantly higher mean IQ than students from previous years. In this case, the mean IQ for this year's students (μ) is greater than the mean IQ for previous years (μ₀).

H1: μ > μ₀

To test these hypotheses, you would gather a random sample of this year's entering students, calculate their mean IQ, and compare it to the historical mean IQ of previous years. Then, using a suitable statistical test like a t-test, you would determine if there's enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis, thus supporting the professor's claim.

To learn more about null hypothesis, click here:

brainly.com/question/28920252

#SPJ11

By arranging the population in a systematic pattern where every kth element has the same value, we ensure that the variance of the 1-in-k systematic sample mean is 0.

To construct a population such that V(īsy) = 0 for 1-in-k systematic sampling, we need to ensure that the population variance is evenly distributed throughout the sample. This can be achieved by selecting a population where the variability within each kth interval is the same.

For example, if we have a population of 1000 individuals, we can divide it into intervals of 10. Within each interval, we can ensure that the variance is the same by selecting individuals with similar characteristics or attributes. This ensures that when we take a 1-in-k systematic sample, the variance within each interval remains the same, resulting in V(īsy) = 0.

It is important to note that systematic sampling is a type of probability sampling where every kth individual is selected from the population. This method is often used when the population is large and spread out, and random sampling is not feasible. However, it is important to ensure that the systematic sampling is truly random and not biased towards any particular group within the population.

To construct a population where the variance of the 1-in-k systematic sample mean (V(īsy)) equals 0, we need to make sure that the sample means are the same for all possible systematic samples.

Step 1: Choose a population size, N, and a sampling interval, k. For simplicity, let's select N=12 and k=3.

Step 2: Arrange the population elements in a systematic pattern. Since we want the variance of the systematic sample mean to be 0, we'll arrange the elements such that every kth element has the same value. For example:

Population: 5, 2, 7, 5, 2, 7, 5, 2, 7, 5, 2, 7

Step 3: Perform 1-in-k systematic sampling. With k=3, we'll take every 3rd element starting from the first element:

Sample 1: 5, 5, 5, 5 (Mean: 5)
Sample 2: 2, 2, 2, 2 (Mean: 2)
Sample 3: 7, 7, 7, 7 (Mean: 7)

Step 4: Verify that V(īsy) = 0. The variance of the sample means is 0, as they are all equal for each possible systematic sample. Therefore, V(īsy) = 0 for this population.

In summary, by arranging the population in a systematic pattern where every kth element has the same value, we ensure that the variance of the 1-in-k systematic sample mean is 0.

Learn more about sampling at: brainly.com/question/12902833

#SPJ11

The requried linear function, slope, and time are y = 502x + 18272, m=502 and 21 months respectively.

We have the following data:

x y

18 27308

27 31826

Using the formula for slope, we have:

m = (31826 - 27308) / (27 - 18)

m = 502

Therefore, the slope of the linear function is 502. This means that for every month that Jeffrey owns the SUV, the odometer reading increases by an average of 502 miles.

To find the y-intercept (b) and complete the linear function, we can use one of the data points and the slope. Let's use the first data point (18, 27308):

27308 = 502(18) + b

b = 18272

Therefore, the linear function that represents the relationship between the odometer reading and time is:

y = 502x + 18272

To find how long it took for the odometer to read 28,814 miles, we can plug in 28,814 for y and solve for x:

28,814 = 502x + 18272

x = 21

Therefore, it took 21 months for the odometer to read 28,814 miles.

Learn more about linear functions here:

https://brainly.com/question/20286983

#SPJ1

A true statement about contextual interference is: it is high if a practice schedule involves a random arrangement of trials.

Contextual interference is a phenomenon in motor learning where practicing multiple variations of a task in a random or mixed order results in interference or disruption during learning. The interference caused by practicing in a mixed order appears to be counterintuitive, as it creates a challenge for the learner to constantly switch between different task variations. However, this interference has been shown to lead to better long-term retention of the learned skill.

The reason why contextual interference works is related to the way our brains process and consolidate information. When we practice a motor skill in a blocked or consistent order, our brains can quickly and easily memorize the movements required for that skill. However, this type of learning tends to be shallow, and the skill is not retained as well over time. In contrast, when we practice a skill in a random or mixed order, our brains have to work harder to distinguish between the different variations of the task. This additional processing load strengthens the neural connections underlying the skill, leading to more durable and flexible memory representations.

To know more about contextual interference,

https://brainly.com/question/29107679

#SPJ11

(i) The number of infected plants among 5 plants follows a binomial distribution with parameters n = 5 and p.

We observed 4 infected plants. To determine the probability of a result at least as extreme as the observed data, we need to calculate the probabilities of 4 and 5 infected plants for a range of values of p and add them up.

The probability of 4 infected plants is:

P(X = 4) = 5C4 * p^4 * (1-p)^1 = 5p^4 * (1-p)

The probability of 5 infected plants is:

P(X = 5) = 5C5 * p^5 * (1-p)^0 = p^5

Therefore, the probability of a result at least as extreme as the observed data is:

P(X >= 4) = P(X = 4) + P(X = 5) = 5p^4 * (1-p) + p^5

(ii) To determine if p = 0.3 or p = 0.2 lie within the 95% confidence interval, we need to find the range of values of p such that the probability of a result at least as extreme as the observed data is less than or equal to 0.025. We can solve this numerically using the expression derived in part (i):

For p = 0.3:

P(X >= 4) = 5(0.3)^4 * (1-0.3) + (0.3)^5 = 0.0765

Since 0.0765 > 0.025, we cannot conclude that p = 0.3 lies within the 95% confidence interval.

For p = 0.2:

P(X >= 4) = 5(0.2)^4 * (1-0.2) + (0.2)^5 = 0.01024

Since 0.01024 < 0.025, we can conclude that p = 0.2 lies within the 95% confidence interval.

(iii) If we observed five infected plants out of five, then the probability of a result at least as extreme as the observed data is simply P(X = 5) = p^5. To determine if p = 0.3 lies within the 95% confidence interval, we need to find the range of values of p such that the probability of observing five infected plants is less than or equal to 0.025:

p^5 <= 0.025

p <= (0.025)^(1/5)

p <= 0.551

Since 0.3 < 0.551, we can conclude that p = 0.3 does not lie within the 95% confidence interval.

(i) The number of infected plants among 5 plants follows a binomial distribution with parameters n = 5 and p. We observed one infected plant. To determine if p = 0.6 or p = 0.7 lie within the 95% confidence interval, we need to find the range of values of p such that the probability of a result at least as extreme as the observed data (i.e., zero or one infected plants) is less than or equal to 0.025:

For p = 0.6:

P(X <= 1) = P(X = 0) + P(X = 1) = (0.4)^5 + 5(0.6)(0.4)^4 = 0.07808

Since 0.07808 > 0.025, we cannot conclude that p = 0.6

Visit here to learn more about binomial distribution brainly.com/question/31197941

#SPJ11

The number of mezzanine tickets that were sold is: 540

Let the regular seats be x

Let the mezzanine seats be y

Thus:

x + y = 910   -----(1)

18.50x + 16.25y = 15620   -----(2)

From eq 1,

y = 910 - x

Thus:

18.50x + 16.25(910 - x) = 15620

18.50x + 14,787.5 - 16.25x = 15620

2.25x = 15620 - 14,787.5

2.25x = 832.5

x = 832.5/2.25

x = 370 tickets

Thus:

y = 910 - 370

y = 540 tickets

Read more about Simultaneous Linear Equations at: https://brainly.com/question/26310043

#SPJ1

The test statistic is 8.93 and the p-value is less than 0.0001 (or 0.05% significance level). Therefore, there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that men have a higher rate of red/green color blindness than women. The answer is A. Yes.

To test the claim that men have a higher rate of red/green color blindness than women, we can use a two-sample proportion test.
The null hypothesis is that the proportion of men with red/green color blindness is equal to the proportion of women with red/green color blindness. The alternative hypothesis is that the proportion of men with red/green color blindness is greater than the proportion of women with red/green color blindness.
The test statistic for this hypothesis test is:
z = (p1 - p2) / sqrt(pooled proportion * (1 - pooled proportion) * (1/n1 + 1/n2))
where p1 is the proportion of men with red/green color blindness, p2 is the proportion of women with red/green color blindness, n1 is the sample size of men, n2 is the sample size of women, and pooled proportion is the weighted average of the two sample proportions:
pooled proportion = (x1 + x2) / (n1 + n2)
where x1 and x2 are the total number of men and women with red/green color blindness, respectively.
Plugging in the values given in the problem, we get:
p1 = 50/550 = 0.0909
p2 = 8/2950 = 0.0027
n1 = 550
n2 = 2950
x1 = 50
x2 = 8
pooled proportion = (50 + 8) / (550 + 2950) = 0.0169
z = (0.0909 - 0.0027) / sqrt(0.0169 * (1 - 0.0169) * (1/550 + 1/2950)) = 8.93
The p-value for this test is the probability of getting a z-value of 8.93 or greater under the null hypothesis. This is an extremely small probability, so we can reject the null hypothesis at the 0.05 significance level.

Learn more about probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/16447117

#SPJ11

The statistical measures for the given set of data are:

Population size: 8

Median: 10

Minimum: 7

Maximum: 14

First quartile: 7.25

Third quartile: 12.75

Interquartile Range: 5.5

Outliers: none

The statistical measures for the given set of data are:

Mean: (7+7+8+9+11+12+13+14)/8 = 10.125

Median: 10

Mode: 7 (since it appears twice)

Range: 14-7 = 7

Variance: 6.625

Standard deviation: √(6.625) = 2.6

To create a box and whiskers plot, we first need to order the data set from smallest to largest:

7, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14

To find the quartiles, we need to find the median (which we already know is 10), and then find the median of the lower half and upper half of the data set separately:

Lower half: 7, 7, 8, 9

Upper half: 11, 12, 13, 14

The median of the lower half is (7+8)/2 = 7.5, and the median of the upper half is (12+13)/2 = 12.5.

Therefore, the quartiles are:

Q1 = 7.25

Q2 (median) = 10

Q3 = 12.75

To find the range of values within 1.5 times the IQR, we first calculate the IQR:

IQR = Q3 - Q1 = 12.5 - 7.5 = 5

Then, we calculate the lower and upper bounds:

Lower bound = Q1 - 1.5IQR = 7.5 - 1.55 = 0

Upper bound = Q3 + 1.5IQR = 12.5 + 1.55 = 20

Since all of the observations fall within the bounds, there are no outliers in this data set.

Using this information, we can create a box and whiskers plot as follows:

To learn more about the box-and-whisker plot ;

https://brainly.com/question/2742784

#SPJ1

using the appropriate derivative or partial derivative(s) of t (v comma d )at the point (90 comma 30 )to estimate how the depth of the dive would have to change in order to compensate for a decrease of 5 liters of air in the tank if you still wish to dive for 47.143 minutes is :

Δd ≈ (t* - T(v*, d*)) / (∂T/∂d)

Without additional information or context, it's not clear what the variables v and d represent, so we can't provide a specific answer to this question.

However, in general, if we have a function T(v, d) that gives us the time that we can spend diving with a tank of air that has volume v and a depth of d, we can use the total derivative to estimate how the depth d needs to change in order to compensate for a decrease of Δv liters of air, while keeping the dive time fixed at a certain value t*. The total derivative is given by:

dT ≈ (∂T/∂v)Δv + (∂T/∂d)Δd

where (∂T/∂v) and (∂T/∂d) are the partial derivatives of T with respect to v and d, evaluated at a specific point (v*, d*).

To estimate the change in depth needed to compensate for a decrease of Δv liters of air while keeping the dive time fixed at t*, we can set d = d* and solve for Δd:

dT ≈ (∂T/∂v)Δv + (∂T/∂d)Δd

Δd ≈ (t* - T(v*, d*)) / (∂T/∂d)

In our case, we need to evaluate this formula at the point (90, 30) and with a decrease of Δv = 5 liters of air, and we need to use the appropriate partial derivatives of T(v, d) with respect to v and d. However, without more information about the function T(v, d), we cannot provide a specific answer to this question.

To know more about partial derivatives, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/31397807

#SPJ11