Answer:
Explanation:
The idea that federal officials took land from settlers to give to American Indians was one of the key issues with the Indian reservation system. The power system of American Indian tribes was not recognized by them.
Slaves captured or purchased in West Africa by Muslim merchants were resold in all of the following places except
A: Australia
B: The Balkans
C: The middle east
Answer:
im like 90 percent sure that the answer is c slaves did NOT go to the middle east
Explanation:
How does the final line of the poem reveal the theme?
A
It illustrates how secrets can lead to disaster.
It shows that praise can be used to deceive others.
С
It suggests that unhappiness can lead to evil actions,
D
It highlights how music can be both beautiful and dangerous.
<
Arizona, New Mexico, and Nevada must honor the Native American reservation treaties drawn up by the..........government for the Native American Nations.
Answer:
Federal
Explanation:
Arizona, New Mexico, and Nevada must honor the Native American reservation treaties drawn up by the FEDERAL government for the Native American Nations.
This is evident in the fact that under the agency of the Bureau of Indian Affairs is where the functions and determinations of issues relating to Native American Nations are placed. This agency is however under the Federal government jurisdiction.
Hence, in this case, the course answer is the FEDERAL government.
Why do some people consider the way the media cover candidates for public office bad for democracy? A. People tend to vote for the candidates who they find most appealing, rather than the ones whose beliefs are most like their own. B. The media are for-profit businesses, unable to be fair or objective in the interest of the public. C. Candidates already in office receive more media attention than those who are trying to take their positions. D. People always vote for the person the media determine is most qualified, rather than the candidate who can bring about change.Why do some people consider the way the media cover candidates for public office bad for democracy? A. People tend to vote for the candidates who they find most appealing, rather than the ones whose beliefs are most like their own. B. The media are for-profit businesses, unable to be fair or objective in the interest of the public. C. Candidates already in office receive more media attention than those who are trying to take their positions. D. People always vote for the person the media determine is most qualified, rather than the candidate who can bring about change.
Answer:
Explanation:
Answer: C
Explanation:
The U.S. is often described as a two-party system. The Democrats and the Republicans are said to hold a duopoly, meaning that they share almost all the political power in the country. Several other countries have a larger number of parties. For example, Japan has at least four parties and Israel has at least twelve parties each vying for power in the elections. Please explain at least 2 ways in which the U.S. government and electoral process would change if a third party emerged and political power in the U.S. was split across three political parties instead of two.
Answer:
The United States has only two major political parties: the Democrats and the Republicans. These parties have a Duopoly, meaning that they share almost all the political power in the country.
Parties In Other Democracies
Most democratic countries have more than two parties. In Israel, for example, twelve parties or party alliances held seats in the seventeenth Knesset. Japan has several major parties, including the Liberal Democratic Party, the Democratic Party of Japan, the New Komeito, and the Japanese Communist Party.
The Electoral System
In the United States, a candidate wins the election by gaining a Plurality, or more votes than any other candidate. This is a Winner-Take-All System because there is no reward for the party or candidate that finishes second. Parties aim to be as large as possible, smoothing over differences among candidates and voters. There is no incentive to form a party that consistently gets votes but cannot win an election. As a result, two political parties usually dominate plurality electoral systems to the disadvantage of smaller third parties, just as the Democrats and the Republicans dominate the American political system. No one person or organization prevents third parties from forming, but the plurality system itself usually hinders their efforts to win votes.
The United States also has mostly Single-Member Districts, meaning that each legislative district sends only one member to the legislature. There is no benefit to finishing second. Some countries use Multiple-Member Districts, which makes it easier for minor parties to succeed because there are more members winning seats in the legislature.
The Electoral College
The Electoral College exacerbates the winner-take-all system because in all but two states, whoever wins the most popular votes wins all of the state’s electoral votes in the presidential election. The electoral rules favor a two-party system, and minor parties have a very difficult time competing in such a system. Even successful third-party candidates often fail to get a single electoral vote.
someone please help i will mark brainiest!!!
Answer:
I meant C because of the word first
I NEED HELP ASAP!!
World history
Answer:
Your answer is C.
Explanation:
The Spanish were known for their powerful
Army
Spices
Armada
Guns
I think that the answer is Army
learning about the holocaust
Number 1-4 plsssss
Answer:
I'll answer when this question updates , okay?
Explanation:
Although some of the Native Americans believed the Europeans caused the disease that killed half their tribe and 80% of the Europeans, de Vaca's host persuaded them not to kill what was left of the foreigners for revenge, reasoning that
A. the Europeans were too sickly to sacrifice to their gods.
B. if the foreigners had the power to cause the disease, so many of them wouldn't also have died.
C. more Europeans might show up and seek revenge against the Native Americans.
Answer: B. if the foreigners had the power to cause the disease, so many of them wouldn't also have died.
Explanation:
It has been estimated that diseases brought by the Europeans to the Americas led to the loss of 90% of Native Americans as they had no prior immunity to counteract the new diseases.
Europeans also died from those same diseases however as shown above with the death of 80% of them in this instance. De Vaca's host was able to stave off revenge killing on the Europeans by showing the Natives that Europeans were equally affected and so did not spread the disease on purpose.
Invention: Airplane
Inventor: The Wright Brothers
HOW IT CHANGED AMERICA
Answer:
The Wright Brothers, Orville and Wilbur, were two American inventors, creators of the first motor plane that could fly autonomously, in 1903. From this invention, modern aviation began to develop, first as a means of transport and then as an instrument of war through the air forces. Thus, this allowed the United States to develop in two ways: first, by shortening distances throughout its vast territory; and then through the evolution and modernization of its armed forces, which gave it a vast advantage over the other nations of the world.
What did Ida Tarbell's book The History of the Standard Oil Company do?
A. Persuaded the government to honor the company
B. Encouraged workers to find a job at the company
C. Described the unfair business practices of the company
D. Convinced traders to invest in the company
Answer:
C
Explanation:
htj4wrryyerhfjeyyufhggjgghngynymyj6ejfndv ffgnyrjyrj
How did Great Britain threaten the United States in 1793?
Answer:
It threatened legal proceedings against any American providing assistance to any country at war.
Explanation:
Answer:
When France and England went to war, France requested that the U.S. make a large repayment of the funds they used to aide in the Revolutionary War. However, the U.S. was pressured against this by Britain as they would see any payment or aid as a hostile act.
Napoleon’s French empire was the greatest empire since the ... empire
Is it the British Empire?
Or the Roman Empire ?
thanks !
Answer:
British... look below
Explanation:
Both of the empires listed were great but the British empire was right before the French. The Roman empire was 1000+ years before. The Roman empire was similar to the French one as they both controlled much of Europe. The British empire didn't control Europe. It controlled the Americas and much of Indonesia/Asia. So it is kind of tough to say but if you are going by the amount of years between them, then its the British.
HOWEVER, if you are talking about the size and amount of power, then probably Roman. But the way this question is phrased, it seems like its talking about years (which would then be British). Sorry I made this a bit confusing lol
Loyalty to a political cause or party is known as partisanship
Answer: true
Explanation: