Answer:
Construction Production
I think its right. I'm not for sure.
the standard maximum time by which a first
appearance should be held has been set at hours after arrest
The defendant should be presented at the next judicial session within six hours after arrest.
those who believe that the supreme court in its rulings should defer to the elective institutions of government are advocating
The advocates of Judicial restraint believed that the supreme court should defer to the elective institutions of government.
What is Judicial restraintBasically, a judicial restraint is said to occurs when a judge reaches a decision mainly on the law without any reliance political preferences.
In other word, the Judicial restraint means a judge refusal to exercise an judicial review line with politics.
In conclusion, the advocates of Judicial restraint believed that the supreme court should defer to the elective institutions of government.
Read more about Judicial restraint
brainly.com/question/857897
Which of the following is the proper order of a criminal trial?
What is the main feature of public-interest groups?
a. They cost nothing to join, because they are not allowed to collect dues.
b. They have special access to elected officials to advance their causes.
c. Their efforts benefit people who are not even members of the group.
d. They are supported by everyone, regardless of political party affiliation.
it's definitely C I can tell this is definitely easy you're welcome.
In general what three elements must be shown by a prosecutor to convict an accused person of a crime
Answer:
In general, every crime involves three elements: first, the act or conduct (“actus reus”); second, the individual's mental state at the time of the act (“mens rea”); and third, the causation between the act and the effect (typically either "proximate causation" or "but-for causation").
Identify which of the following cases is protected by the expectation of privacy:
A person smoking marijuana on the street with a police officer a few feet away from him
A police officer climbing the fire escape to take a look through your window and seeing that you have a gun on your bed for which he arrests you.
A police officer noticing that there is a cloud of smoke in your car, after which he demands to inspect the inside of your car for illegal substances.
A person exiting a gun store with an unregistered gun in his hand, which the police officer notices and asks for a license and permit.
cloud smoke in the car
Explanation:
because the police did not know what the person is doing in the car that cost smoke
Answer:
Option number #2
Explanation:
Hey, Ace here!
I'm not the best to consult for law, but here are my thoughts on the proceedings.
For option 1: we can rule that out as an option because the officer can clearly see the person is smoking an illegal substance.
For option 2: A police officer can view anything which any member of the public can view from a public vantage point. For example, if the police goes to the front door of a house, and can see the interior of the building, that's fair game. But if the officer starts going around the house to peek into the windows, that is not fair game. In this case, the officer climbed through the fire escape—a place that can't be viewed from a public vantage point—to look into your window.
For option 3: I believe there is probable cause to ask to inspect the car. If there is a cloud of smoke in a car, the reason for it is pretty limited. Either there is a malfunction in the car causing it to smoke up, or someone is smoking in there. Seeing the inside of the car is also from the public vantage point, so that's why I think this would be okay.
For option 4: if someone has an unregistered gun in their hands, there's probable cause for the police officer to ask for a license and permit.
Again, I'm not 100% familiar with law, but from the hours of research I have done on the 4th amendment, and from pure logic, this is what I conclude.
Hope this was helpful, let me know if you have any questions.
21. Compensation for senators is
A. set by the Constitution.
B. higher than for representatives.
C. set by the President.
D. the same as for representatives.
What type of evidence is analyzed by using vacuum metal deposition
To what extent do interest groups and lobbying advance (help) or harm democracy?
Answer:
interest groups can be both beneficial and harmful to the democratic process
- interest groups can give people a voice who might otherwise not be heard
- They educate government officials and the public about particular issues, represent people across geographical boundaries, and provide a way for individuals to get involved in public affairs
- the also add another element to the checks and balances feature of the of the political process
Explanation:
sorry if it doesn't help
what happens when you are held in contempt of congress
write a couple of paragraph about an interesting dream that you have had
Answer:
I was so excited! but then I woke up and knew it was just a dream! it was the most interesting dream I've ever had because it's like doing something bad and getting a prize for it. This moment probably ensured a few seconds as it flashed through the neutrons of my brain, but the memory of it may last for a lifetime!
in response to the supreme court’s treatment of new deal programs, president roosevelt proposed the
Answer:Wagner Act
Explanation:
a driver who is taking a non-prescription drug should
Any driver who is taking a non-prescription drug should continue to drive regardless of any warning label on the drug.
A non-prescription drugs refers to those as drugs that are deemed safe and effective for use by the people without necessary advice from a medical practitioner.
An example of non-prescription drugs includes pain relievers, cough suppressants etc
In conclusion, any driver who is taking a non-prescription drug should continue to drive regardless of any warning label on the drug.
Read more about non-prescription drug
brainly.com/question/2343237
Drag each characteristic to the correct location on the table. Each characteristic will be used only once.
The table shows two plans of government proposed at the Constitutional Convention. Complete the table by matching each characteristic with
the correct plan.
stronger national government
single-house legislature
weaker national government
two-house legislature
New Jersey Plan
Virginia Plan
chief executive
chosen by legislature
chief executive chosen by
legislature and serves a
single term
Based on a historical perspective, the New Jersey Plan is characterized by "weaker national government" and "single-house legislature."
New Jersey Plan was introduced during the Constitutional Convention in 1787 by William Paterson.
In contrast, the Virginia Plan is characterized by a stronger national government and a two-house legislature.
Virginia Pan was introduced during the Constitutional Convention in 1787 by James Madison.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the Constitutional Convention in 1787 had different inputs from different perceptions.
Learn more about Constitutional Convention in 1787 here: https://brainly.com/question/811214
Answer:
The New Jersey Plan had:
A Weaker National GovernmentSingle-House LegislatureThe Virgiinia Plan had:
A Stronger National GovernmentTwo-House LegislatureExplanation:
See attached photo