NUMber 5
If you eplain how you didi it I put you as brianliest

Answer:

Sal previously earned $61640.

Answer:

$62,000.00

Step-by-step explanation:

x + .08x = 66960  Combine like terms

1.08 x = 66960  Divide both sides by 1.08

[tex]\frac{1.08x}{1.08}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{66960}{1.08}[/tex]

x = 62000

Answer:

6000

Step-by-step explanation:

Interest of 3% a year of principal of 200,000 = 6000

monthly payment of 843 also includes a portion of amortization of the principal itself, which you can ignore cause the question only asked for the interest portion.

this is an unclear question cause it didn't say PER YEAR interest paid.  you only need to remember interest% * principal = ANNUAL interest payment $.  Then you can divide that over 12 months, which is 500$ per month.

Perimeter (P) = AB + BC + CD + DA.

The perimeter of a trapezoid is the sum of the lengths of each side of the trapezoid. A trapezoid is a quadrilateral that has two sides parallel to each other and two non-parallel sides termed as bases and legs respectively. Let us learn how to calculate the perimeter of the trapezoid in this article.

perimeter of the trapezoid=sum of 4 side

                                            =AB+BC+CD+DA

Perimeter (P) = AB + BC + CD + DA.

It can also be written as a sum of lengths of parallel sides and the sum of lengths of non-parallel sides where AB and CD are the parallel sides and AD and BC are the non-parallel sides.

To learn more about perimeter of the trapezoid refers to;

https://brainly.com/question/19036195

#SPJ1

An equation of a circle which represents the picture include the following: A. (x)² + (y)² = 25.

In Mathematics, the standard form of the equation of a circle is represented by this mathematical expression;

(x - h)² + (y - k)² = r²  

Where:

From the information provided above, we have the following points on this circle:

Substituting the given points into the equation of a circle, we have the following;

(x - 0)² + (y - 0)² = 5²  

(x)² + (y)² = 25.

Read more on equation of a circle here: https://brainly.com/question/14866858

#SPJ1

The slope of the relationship is equal to; C. 4.

In Mathematics, the slope of any straight line can be calculated by using this mathematical expression;

Slope (m) = (Change in y-axis, Δy)/(Change in x-axis, Δx)

Slope (m) = (y₂ - y₁)/(x₂ - x₁)

From the information provided above, we have the following data points on the line:

Substituting the given points into the slope formula, we have;

Slope (m) = (y₂ - y₁)/(x₂ - x₁)

Slope (m) = (-9 + 13)/(-1 - (-2))

Slope (m) = 4/1

Slope (m) = 4

Read more on slope here: brainly.com/question/28427398

#SPJ1

Check the picture below.

Answer:

x=−3⋅−6+4=x=22

Step-by-step explanation:

Her monthly finance charge will be: $1.80

Now, According to the question:

Gabriela has an average daily balance of $232. 94 on her credit card.

and, Her card charges 9. 25% annual interest.

Based on the given condition:

$232.94 × 9.25%

232.94 × 9.25/100

Calculate the product or quotient:

232.94 × 9.25/100 = 21.54694

21.54694 rounds up to 21.55

Her monthly finance charge will be:

21.55/12 = 1.7958333333

1.7958333333 round up 1.80

Learn more about Annual Interest at:

https://brainly.com/question/26381520

#SPJ4

Answer:

x = 11

Step-by-step explanation:

We know that the answer we will get will be the same as BD because BD and AC are congrudent, meaning that they are exactly equal shape and size. To find 'x' our equation would be: 29 = 3x - 4. To figure this out we just add 29 and 4 which gives us 33 and then divide that by 3 which gives us 11 (our answer)

The length of Jane's shadow is approximately 2.85 feet

To find the length of Jane's shadow, we can use the principle of similar triangles.

The ratio of the shadow length to the object height is the same for both King Neptune and Jane, then we can set up a proportion:

(shadow length of King Neptune) / (height of King Neptune) = (shadow length of Jane) / (height of Jane)

Given that King Neptune's shadow is 3 13 5 feet and the statue is 34 feet tall.

By substituting these values into the proportion:

(3 13 5 feet) / (34 feet) = (shadow length of Jane) / (5' 9")

To find the shadow length of Jane, we can cross-multiply and solve for the shadow length:

(3 13 5 feet) * (5' 9") = (shadow length of Jane) * (34 feet)

Converting Jane's height into feet: 5'9" = 5*12 +9 = 69 inches = 5.75 ft

(3 13 5 feet) * (5.75 ft) = (shadow length of Jane) * (34 feet)

shadow length of Jane = (313.5*5.75) / 34 = 2.85 ft

So, The length of Jane's shadow is approximately 2.85 feet.

To learn more about proportions:

https://brainly.com/question/1496357

#SPj4

For the given case the Null hypothesis is The mean mpg of the 91 cars tested is equal to the manufacturer's mpg rating of 55.7 and the  Alternative hypothesis is The mean mpg of the 91 cars tested is less than the manufacturer's mpg rating of 55.7.

In order to determine whether the cars underperform the manufacturer's mpg rating, the independent testing firm would need to perform a hypothesis test. To do this, they would need to compare their sample mean of 55.2 mpg with the manufacturer's mpg rating of 55.7. They would also need to know the standard deviation of the sample, which is 3.24.

The independent testing firm would then calculate the z-score by subtracting the manufacturer's rating from the sample mean, and dividing it by the standard deviation. If the z-score is greater than the critical value for a 0.05 level of significance, then there is sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis.

In this case, the z-score is -1.51. Since the critical value for a 0.05 level of significance is 1.96, the z-score is less than the critical value. Therefore, there is not sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we cannot conclude that the cars underperform the manufacturer's mpg rating.

To know more about the null hypothesis refer to the link brainly.com/question/28920252

#SPJ4

Answer:

see attached

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]7+2^3[/tex]

[tex]7+(2^3)[/tex]

[tex]7+8[/tex]

[tex]=\fbox{15}[/tex]

She could only solve 24 * 25 if the array has 24 rows and 25 columns or vice versa

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

Product expression = 24 * 25

An array is a set of items that has rows and columns

The array is not given

However, the true statement is that: for Rosie to evaluate the expression using an array, then the array must be a 24 x 25 array or 25 x 24 array

Read more about array at

https://brainly.com/question/13134820

#SPJ1

The probability that the mean number of raisins in the Happy Trail Mix is more than the mean number of raisins in the generic mix is 9.7%.

To solve this problem, we need to use the central limit theorem, which states that the distribution of the sample means approaches a normal distribution as the sample size increases. With a sample size of 17, we can approximate the distribution of the sample means as normal.

Let's call the mean of the Happy Trail Mix sample x and the mean of the generic mix sample y.

Using the formula for the mean of a normal distribution, we can find the mean of x and y:

μx = μ = 33.6

μy = μ = 28.8

Using the formula for the standard deviation of the sample mean, we can find the standard deviation of x and y:

σx = σ/√n = 8.4/√17 = 2.04

σy = σ/√n = 12.7/√17 = 3.08

Now that we have the mean and standard deviation of x and y, we can use a normal distribution calculator or a z-score table to find the probability that x > y.

The z-score is given by:

z = (x - y - μ)/σ = (33.6 - 28.8)/(√(2.04^2 + 3.08^2)) = 1.30

Using a standard normal table, we find that the probability of a z-score being greater than 1.30 is 0.097, or 9.7%.

To know more on central limit theorem

https://brainly.com/question/18403552

#SPJ4

Answer:

AAA similarity

Step-by-step explanation:

      In ΔECD,

            ∠E + ∠D + ∠ECD = 180°   {Angle sum property}

            ∠E + 36 + 123       = 180°

                      ∠E + 159     = 180

                                   ∠E = 180 - 159

                                  ∠E = 21°

In ΔACB,

           ∠A + ∠B + ∠ACB = 180°   {Angle sum property}

            ∠ACB + 36 + 21       = 180°

                      ∠ACB + 57    = 180

                                   ∠ACB = 180 - 57

                                  ∠ACB= 123°

    In ΔECD & ΔBCA,

               ∠A ≅ ∠D

              ∠B ≅ ∠A

           ∠BCA ≅ ∠ECA

ΔECD ~ ΔBCA by Angle Angle Angle similarity.

Answer:

b

Step-by-step explanation:

the sum of the 3 angles in the triangle = 180°

sum the 3 angles and equate to 180

2x + 1 + 5x + 5 + 90 = 180

7x + 96 = 180 ( subtract 96 from both sides )

7x = 84 ( divide both sides by 7 )

x = 12

Answer:

decimal form is limited of 3 numbers after the point only.

so it will be 1.45

I hope I help you in this ans and tq.

Sum to the correct number of significant figures is 6.43

Significant figures are the number of digits in a value, often a measurement, that contribute to the degree of accuracy of the value. We start counting significant figures at the first non-zero digit.

Significant figures are used to establish the number which is presented in the form of digits. These digits carry a meaningful representation of numbers. The term significant digits are also used often instead of figures. We can identify the number of significant digits by counting all the values starting from the 1st non-zero digit located on the left. For example, 12.45 has four significant digits.

Since the least precise measurement 1.67 is correct to only two decimal place.

  2.0800

+ 2.677

+  1.67          

  6.427

Therefore, the final result should be rounded off to 6.43 where Significant Figures: 3, Decimals: 2.

The arithmetic addition of given numbers to the correct number of significant figures is 6.43.

To learn more about Significant Figures visit : brainly.com/question/29153641

#SPJ4

We can write the coordinates after reflection as -

A (x₁, y₁) → A" (x₁, - y₁)

B (x₂, y₂) → B" (x₂, - y₂)

C (x₃, y₃) → C" (x₃, - y₃)

Given is that to describe a sequence of transformation that maps triangle ΔABC onto triangle ΔA”B”C” a student starts with a reflection over x - axis.

Assume the coordinates of a triangle are -

A (x₁, y₁)

B (x₂, y₂)

C (x₃, y₃)

So after the reflection over the {x} axis, we can write the coordinates as -

A" (x₁, - y₁)

B" (x₂, - y₂)

C" (x₃, - y₃)

Therefore, we can write the coordinates after reflection as -

A (x₁, y₁) → A" (x₁, - y₁)

B (x₂, y₂) → B" (x₂, - y₂)

C (x₃, y₃) → C" (x₃, - y₃)

To solve more questions on graph reflections, visit the link below -

brainly.com/question/7835414

#SPJ1

To find the balance of the account after 3 years, we can use the formula for compound interest:

A = P(1 + r/n)^(nt)

Where A is the final amount, P is the initial principal, r is the interest rate, n is the number of times the interest is compounded per year, and t is the number of years.

In this case, the initial principal is $2,600, the interest rate is 4.2% (expressed as a decimal), the number of times the interest is compounded per year is 12 (monthly), and the number of years is 3.

So, we can plug these values into the formula:

A = 2600(1 + 0.042/12)^(12*3)

A = 2600(1.0035)^36

A = 2600 * 3.876

A = 10,049.6

The balance of the account after 3 years is $10,049.6.

The measure of the smallest possible sector angle possible is 8°.

Let [tex]$a_1$[/tex] be the first term of the arithmetic progression and [tex]$a_{12}$[/tex] be the last term of the arithmetic progression.

From the formula of the sum of an arithmetic progression, we have -

[tex]$12*\frac{a_1+a_{12}}{2}=360$[/tex]

simplifying we get,

[tex]$a_1 + a_{12} = 60$[/tex]

[tex]$a_{12}$[/tex]  is the largest term of the progression and it can also be expressed as-

[tex]a_{12} = $a_1+11d$[/tex]

where d is a common difference.

Since each angle measure must be an integer, d should also be an integer.

[tex]$a_{12}-a_1=a_1+11d-a_1=11d$[/tex]

Since d is an integer, the difference between the first and last terms, 11d, must be divisible by 11.

Since the total difference should be less than 60, let's start checking multiples of 11 less than 60 for the total difference between [tex]$a_1$[/tex] and [tex]$a_{12}$[/tex].

Let us take the largest multiple because the maximum difference will give us the minimum value of the first term.

If the difference is 55, [tex]$a_1=\frac{60-55}{2}=2.5$[/tex], is not an integer.

If the difference is 44, [tex]$a_1=\frac{60-44}{2}= 8[/tex] . It satisfies the given conditions.

Hence, the measure of the smallest possible sector angle possible = 8°.

Read more about arithmetic progression:

brainly.com/question/27902540

#SPJ4

If on Wednesday evening sonto spent one ½ doing doing homework 45 minutes doing housework 1 hour visiting friends and 1 hour ½ watching television .This  information in a ratio is: 2: 3 : 4 :6.

We need to first analyze the details  before determining the ratio.

​1 hour = 60 minutes

1/2 h = 30 minutes

1 1/2 = 90 minutes

So,

30 : 45 = 60 :90

Reduce the above minutes  to ratio

2: 3 : 4 :6

Therefore the ratio of the information is 2: 3 : 4 :6.

Learn more about ratio here:https://brainly.com/question/2914376

#SPJ1

The time needed until there are 82 bacteria is given as follows:

23.8 hours.

An exponential function is defined as follows:

[tex]y = a(b)^{\frac{x}{n}}[/tex]

In which:

The parameters for this problem are given as follows:

a = 40, b = 2, n = 23.

Hence the function is:

[tex]y = 40(2)^{\frac{x}{23}}[/tex]

There will be 82 bacteria at a time x when y = 82, hence:

[tex]82 = 40(2)^{\frac{x}{23}}[/tex]

[tex](2)^{\frac{x}{23}} = 2.05[/tex]

Applying the logarithm of base 2 to each side, we have that:

x/23 = log2(2.05)

x = 23 x log2(2.05)

x = 23.8 hours.

More can be learned about exponential functions at https://brainly.com/question/25537936

#SPJ1

Answer:  We can use the concept of rates to solve this problem.

A rate is a ratio of the amount of work done to the amount of time it takes to do the work. We can find the rate of work for the 4 painters by dividing the number of rooms they painted by the number of hours it took them:

Rate = Rooms painted / Hours

Rate = 12 rooms / 8 hours = 1.5 rooms per hour

Now we can use this rate to find out how long it will take 7 painters to paint 21 rooms. To do this, we'll use the formula:

Time = Rooms / Rate

Time = 21 rooms / 1.5 rooms per hour = 14 hours

So it would take 7 painters working at the same efficiency as the 4 painters 14 hours to paint 21 rooms.

Step-by-step explanation:

The length of diagonal of a parallelogram is 2546 inches.

A quadrilateral with equal pairs of opposing sides and angles is referred to as a parallelogram. It has a pair of opposing sides that are parallel to one another. The inner angles are supplementary in nature, meaning that the sum of them equals 180 degrees. A parallelogram's diagonals are bisected by one another, or divided into two equal portions. A parallelogram's internal angles add up to 360 degrees.

The diagonals of parallelogram are given by:

x = √(a^2 + b^2 – 2ab cos A) = √(a^2 + b^2 + 2ab cos B)

Given the two sides are 35 and 75 inches.

We also know that the adjacent angles of parallelogram are supplementary:

∠A + ∠B = 180

140 + ∠B = 180

∠B = 40

Substitute the value of sides and angle in the equation:

x = √(a^2 + b^2 – 2ab cos A) = √(a^2 + b^2 + 2ab cos B)

x = √((35)^2 + (72)^2 + 2(35)(72) cos 140)

x = 1225 + 5184 + (5040)(-0.766)

x = 1225 + 5184 - 3860

x = 2546 inches

Hence, the length of diagonal is 2546 inches.

Learn more about parallelogram here:

https://brainly.com/question/29147156

#SPJ1

Answer:

If you get 7 tokens a minute and you work for 9 hours, or 540 minutes, then you would have:

7 tokens/minute * 540 minutes = 3780 tokens

You would have 3780 tokens in total.

Answer:

3,780

Step-by-step explanation:

7* 540= 3780

because you get 7 every minute and there are 540 minutes

Answer: An inequality for the expected population, p, next year can be written using the information provided. Since the population is expected to grow between 5% and 8% per year, we can represent that as a range of growth rates: 0.05 <= growth rate <= 0.08

To find the expected population next year, we can use the formula:

p = population * (1 + growth rate)

where "population" is the current population of 50,000 and "growth rate" is the percentage increase. Since the growth rate is expected to be between 0.05 and 0.08, we can write the inequality as:

50,000 * (1 + 0.05) <= p <= 50,000 * (1 + 0.08)

This inequality represents the expected range of population next year, with the lower bound being the population if it grows by 5% and the upper bound being the population if it grows by 8%.

Simplifying the inequality:

52,500 <= p <= 54,000

So the expected population next year, p, is between 52,500 and 54,000.

Step-by-step explanation: