Answer:
C, hope this helps :)
Explanation:
someone please help i will mark brainiest!!!
Answer:
I meant C because of the word first
The U.S. is often described as a two-party system. The Democrats and the Republicans are said to hold a duopoly, meaning that they share almost all the political power in the country. Several other countries have a larger number of parties. For example, Japan has at least four parties and Israel has at least twelve parties each vying for power in the elections. Please explain at least 2 ways in which the U.S. government and electoral process would change if a third party emerged and political power in the U.S. was split across three political parties instead of two.
Answer:
The United States has only two major political parties: the Democrats and the Republicans. These parties have a Duopoly, meaning that they share almost all the political power in the country.
Parties In Other Democracies
Most democratic countries have more than two parties. In Israel, for example, twelve parties or party alliances held seats in the seventeenth Knesset. Japan has several major parties, including the Liberal Democratic Party, the Democratic Party of Japan, the New Komeito, and the Japanese Communist Party.
The Electoral System
In the United States, a candidate wins the election by gaining a Plurality, or more votes than any other candidate. This is a Winner-Take-All System because there is no reward for the party or candidate that finishes second. Parties aim to be as large as possible, smoothing over differences among candidates and voters. There is no incentive to form a party that consistently gets votes but cannot win an election. As a result, two political parties usually dominate plurality electoral systems to the disadvantage of smaller third parties, just as the Democrats and the Republicans dominate the American political system. No one person or organization prevents third parties from forming, but the plurality system itself usually hinders their efforts to win votes.
The United States also has mostly Single-Member Districts, meaning that each legislative district sends only one member to the legislature. There is no benefit to finishing second. Some countries use Multiple-Member Districts, which makes it easier for minor parties to succeed because there are more members winning seats in the legislature.
The Electoral College
The Electoral College exacerbates the winner-take-all system because in all but two states, whoever wins the most popular votes wins all of the state’s electoral votes in the presidential election. The electoral rules favor a two-party system, and minor parties have a very difficult time competing in such a system. Even successful third-party candidates often fail to get a single electoral vote.
Napoleon’s French empire was the greatest empire since the ... empire
Is it the British Empire?
Or the Roman Empire ?
thanks !
Answer:
British... look below
Explanation:
Both of the empires listed were great but the British empire was right before the French. The Roman empire was 1000+ years before. The Roman empire was similar to the French one as they both controlled much of Europe. The British empire didn't control Europe. It controlled the Americas and much of Indonesia/Asia. So it is kind of tough to say but if you are going by the amount of years between them, then its the British.
HOWEVER, if you are talking about the size and amount of power, then probably Roman. But the way this question is phrased, it seems like its talking about years (which would then be British). Sorry I made this a bit confusing lol
The Spanish were known for their powerful
Army
Spices
Armada
Guns
I think that the answer is Army
I NEED HELP ASAP!!
World history
Answer:
Your answer is C.
Explanation:
7. The principle of republicanism refers to -
A. giving one branch of government power over another branch of government
B. sharing power between the state and federal government
C. the House of Representatives voting for Senators
D. a system of government where citizens vote for people to rule on their behalf
Answer:
a
Explanation:
learning about the holocaust
Number 1-4 plsssss
Answer:
I'll answer when this question updates , okay?
Explanation:
Why was the Haiti Revolution important give me at least 3 reasons
Answer:
1. Haiti is the only country where slave freedom was taken by force, and marks the only successful slave revolt in modern times
2. The Haitian Revolution would lead to the doubling of the size of the United States. It was Napoleon's loss of Haiti that convinced the overextended dictator to sell the Louisiana territory to the fledgling US.
3. The country also became the first black republic in the world.
4. Haiti at the time was the wealthiest of France's colonies, and the colonial power was unwilling to cede the territory.
i did one better
GOTCHU
Loyalty to a political cause or party is known as partisanship
Answer: true
Explanation:
Although some of the Native Americans believed the Europeans caused the disease that killed half their tribe and 80% of the Europeans, de Vaca's host persuaded them not to kill what was left of the foreigners for revenge, reasoning that
A. the Europeans were too sickly to sacrifice to their gods.
B. if the foreigners had the power to cause the disease, so many of them wouldn't also have died.
C. more Europeans might show up and seek revenge against the Native Americans.
Answer: B. if the foreigners had the power to cause the disease, so many of them wouldn't also have died.
Explanation:
It has been estimated that diseases brought by the Europeans to the Americas led to the loss of 90% of Native Americans as they had no prior immunity to counteract the new diseases.
Europeans also died from those same diseases however as shown above with the death of 80% of them in this instance. De Vaca's host was able to stave off revenge killing on the Europeans by showing the Natives that Europeans were equally affected and so did not spread the disease on purpose.