mortician math word problem

Answer:

For the functions to coincide, the value of k in y = (kx)3 must be smaller than in y = kx3. This is because the value of y changes more rapidly when k is cubed inside the parentheses. The behavior of the functions is similar since a vertical stretch is similar to a horizontal compression.

Step-by-step explanation:

PLATO

9514 1404 393

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

1. House prices vary considerably. In January, 2021, the median US house price was about $269,000, growing at the rate of about 3.2% per year. For the purpose of this problem, we have chosen a slightly lower price of ...

   $250,000 . . . selected house price

20% of this price is ...

  0.20 × $250,000 = $50,000 . . . amount of down payment

__

2. House prices are growing faster than the interest rate we can get at the bank, so we want to minimize the amount of time we save for a down payment. At the same time, we recognize that saving this amount quickly will put a significant strain on the budget. We choose a period of 2 years, and assume a bank rate on savings of 3%. (US rates in mid-2021 average about 0.04%.) This annuity formula gives the future value of a series of payments:

  A = P((1+r/12)^(12t)-1)(12/r) . . . . monthly payment P at annual rate r for t years

Solving for P, we have ...

  P = A(r/12)/((1 +r/12)^(12t) -1)

Filling in the chosen numbers, we find we need to save ...

  P = $50,000(0.03/12)/(1 +0.03/12)^(12·2) -1) = $50,000(0.0025)/0.06175704

  P = $2024.06

$2024.06 needs to be deposited every month for 2 years at 3%.

__

3. The mortgage will be for ...

  $250,000 -50,000 = $200,000

We assume we can get an APR of 5% on a 30-year loan. (US rates in mid-2021 are around 3.2%.) The formula for the payment amount is ...

  A = P(r/12)/(1 -(1 +r/12)^(-12t)) . . . principal P at rate r for t years

Filling in the chosen numbers, we find the monthly payment to be ...

  A = $200,000(0.05/12)/(1 -(1 +0.05/12)^(-12·30))

  = $200,000(0.0041666667)/0.77617340 = $1073.64

The monthly mortgage payment will be $1073.64.

Answer:

the answer is a=b

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

s= 16t^2+128t, answer.......

please mark this answer as brainlist

Answer:

slope = [tex]\frac{1}{4}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Calculate the slope m using the slope formula

m = [tex]\frac{y_{2}-y_{1} }{x_{2}-x_{1} }[/tex]

with (x₁, y₁ ) = (0, 1) and (x₂, y₂ ) = (4, 2)

m = [tex]\frac{2-1}{4-0}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{1}{4}[/tex]

Answer:

the answer would be 1/4

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

i. Has a liver problems?

= 0.08

ii. Is a heavy drinker ?

= 0.066

iii. If a person is found to be a heavy drinker, what is the probability that this person has liver problem?

= 0.303

iv. If a person is found to have liver problems, what is the probability that this person is a heavy drinker?

= 0.25

v. If a person is found to be a non –drinker, what is the probability that this person has liver problems?

= 0.104

Step-by-step explanation:

We have 2 Events in this question

Event A: People with liver problems

Event B : People without liver problems

Event A: People with liver problems

Let us represent people with liver problems as = (L)

a)8% have liver problems. = P(L)

Under liver problems we have:

b) 25% are heavy drinkers = P( L & H)

c) 35% are social drinkers = P( L & S)

d) 40% are non-drinkers. = P( L & N)

Event B( no liver problem)

Let us represent no liver problem as NL

We are not given in the question but Probability of having no liver problem = 100 - Probability of having liver problem

= 100 - 8% = 92 %

P(NL ) = 92%

From the question, For people without liver problems, we have:

a) 5% are heavy drinkers = P(NL & H)

b) 65% are social drinkers = P( NL & S)

c) 30% do not drink at all = P( NL & N)

An adult is chosen at random, what is the probability that this person

i. Has a liver problems?

P(L) = 8% or 0.08

ii. Is a heavy drinker ?

From the question, we have:

Probability of people that have liver problems and are heavy drinkers P(L & H) = 25% = 0.25

Probability of people that have do not have liver problems and are heavy drinkers P(NL & H) = 5% = 0.05

Probability ( Heavy drinker) =

P(L) × P(L & H) + P(NL) × P(NL & H)

= 0.25 × 0.08 + 0.05 × 0.92

= 0.066

iii. If a person is found to be a heavy drinker, what is the probability that this person has liver problem?

Probability (Heavy drinker and has liver problem) = [P(L) × P(L & H)] ÷ [P(L) × P(L & H)] + [P(NL) × P(NL & H) ]

= [0.25 × 0.08] ÷ [0.25 × 0.08] + [0.05 × 0.92]

= 0.303030303

Approximately = 0.303

iv. If a person is found to have liver problems, what is the probability that this person is a heavy drinker?

P(L & H) = 25% = 0.25

v. If a person is found to be a non –drinker, what is the probability that this person has liver problems.?

People with liver problems are non-drinkers. = P( L & N) = 40% = 0.4

People without liver problems and do not drink at all = P( NL & N) = 30% = 0.3

Probability (non drinker and has liver problem) = [P( L & N) × P(L & H)] ÷ [P( L & N) × P(L & H)] + [ P( NL & N) × P(NL & H) ]

= [0.4× 0.08] ÷ [0.4 × 0.08] + [0.3 × 0.92]

= 0.1038961039

Approximately ≈ 0.104

Answer:

43

Step-by-step explanation:

1 , 4 , 7 , 10

→ Find the difference between each term

4 - 1 = 3, 7 - 4 = 3 and 10 - 7 = 3

→ Put this into the nth term format

3n + x

→ Write the 3 times tables above the sequence and find what you need to take away from the times tables to get to the sequence

3 , 6 , 9 , 12

1 , 4 , 7 , 10

→ Minus 2

3n - 2

→ Substitute 15 as n

3 × 15 - 2 = 43

Answer:

I'm gonna say C

Complete Question

On the uploaded image is a similar question that will explain the given question

Answer:

The value of k is  [tex]k = 214285.7[/tex]

The percentage  of the oil that will be cleaned is [tex]x = 80.77\%[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

   The  cost of cleaning up the spillage is  [tex]C = \frac{ k x }{100 - x }[/tex]  [tex]x \le x \le 100[/tex]

     The  cost of cleaning x =  70% of the oil is  [tex]C = \$500,000[/tex]

Now at  [tex]C = \$500,000[/tex] we have  

       [tex]\$ 500000 = \frac{ k * 70 }{100 - 70 }[/tex]

       [tex]\$ 500000 = \frac{ k * 70 }{30 }[/tex]

      [tex]\$ 500000 = \frac{ k * 70 }{30 }[/tex]

      [tex]k = 214285.7[/tex]

Now  When  [tex]C = \$900,000[/tex]

       [tex]x = 80.77\%[/tex]

Answer:

1200 ×90÷8 is not correct ans

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

16,x+4

by completing square formula

Answer: multiply 631.6 by 0.8​ = 505.28

Answer:

Question to number 6 is-3

Question to number 7 is 3

Question to number 8 is 2 to the second power

Step-by-step explanation:

please correct me if I’m wrong and for number 8 I am correct it’s just I didn’t know how to put the little 2 on top of the big one

Step-by-step explanation:

question 6 is - 3

question 7 is 3

question 8 is 4

Answer:

x=4 and x=3

Step-by-step explanation:

The first step to find all factors of 12

1,2,3,4,6,12

and their negative form

-1,-2,-3,-4,-6,-12

we must add two of these numbers to get -7

and the two numbers that add up to -7 are -3 and -4

we can simply plot them into the polynomial (x-3)(x-4)

since x-3=0

we add three to both sides to get x=3

and since x-4=0

add four to both sides

we get x=4

and now check out work which

we can use First out in last (foil) method

(x-3)(x-4)

first

x^2

out

-4x

in

-3x

last

12

now we simplify to get x^2-7x+12

so it x=4 x=3 works

Answer:

x² - 7x + 12 = 0

doing middle term factorization

x²-4x-3x+12=0

taking common from each two term

x(x-4)-3(x-4)=0

taking common

(x-4)(x-3)=0

either

x-4=0

:. x=4

or

x-3=0

x=3

:.x=4,3

Answer:

It results in no solution.

Step-by-step explanation:

If you subtract x on both sides, this will leave you with 0 ≠ 3. The result is no solution. This is why it is contradictory.

Answer:

x > -6

Step-by-step explanation:

-5x — 10 < 20

Add 10 to each side

-5x — 10+10 < 20+10

-5x < 30

Divide each side by -5, remembering to flip the inequality

-5x/-5 > 30/-5

x > -6

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]-5x - 10 < 20\\\\\mathrm{Add\:}10\mathrm{\:to\:both\:sides}\\\\-5x-10+10<20+10\\\\\mathrm{Multiply\:both\:sides\:by\:-1\:\left(reverse\:the\:inequality\right)}\\\\\left(-5x\right)\left(-1\right)>30\left(-1\right)\\\\\mathrm{Simplify}\\\\5x>-30\\\\\mathrm{Divide\:both\:sides\:by\:}5\\\\\frac{5x}{5}>\frac{-30}{5}\\\\x>-6[/tex]

Answer: r = 11

Step-by-step explanation:

We know that the point (-2, r) lies on the graph of:

2*x + y = 7.

Then, if we that point is on the graph of the equation, we can replace the values and we will have:

2*(-2) + r = 7

and now we solve this for r-

-4 + r = 7

r = 7 + 4 = 11

r = 11

Answer:

We conclude that prenatal cocaine exposure is associated with lower scores of four-year-old children on the test of object assembly.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that the 190 children born to cocaine users had a mean of 7.3 and a standard deviation of 3.0 The 186 children not exposed to cocaine had a mean score of 8.2 with a standard deviation of 3.0.

Let [tex]\mu_1[/tex] = population mean score for children born to cocaine users.

[tex]\mu_2[/tex] = population mean score for children not exposed to cocaine.

So, Null Hypothesis, : = 490      {means that the prenatal cocaine exposure is not associated with lower scores of four-year-old children on the test of object assembly}

Alternate Hypothesis, : 490     {means that the prenatal cocaine exposure is associated with lower scores of four-year-old children on the test of object assembly}

The test statistics that will be used here is Two-sample t-test statistics because we don't know about population standard deviations;

                               T.S.  =  [tex]\frac{(\bar X_1-\bar X_2)-(\mu_1-\mu_2)}{s_p \times \sqrt{\frac{1}{n_1}+\frac{1}{n_2} } }[/tex]  ~ [tex]t__n_1_+_n_2_-_2[/tex]

where, [tex]\bar X_1[/tex] = sample mean score of children born to cocaine users = 7.3

[tex]\bar X_2[/tex] = sample mean score of children not exposed to cocaine = 8.2

[tex]s_1[/tex] = sample standard deviation for children born to cocaine users = 3

[tex]s_2[/tex] = sample standard deviation for children not exposed to cocaine = 3

[tex]n_1[/tex] = sample of children born to cocaine users = 190

[tex]n_2[/tex] = sample of children not exposed to cocaine = 186

Also, [tex]s_p=\sqrt{\frac{(n_1-1)\times s_1^{2}+(n_2-1)\times s_2^{2} }{n_1+n_2-2} }[/tex]  = [tex]\sqrt{\frac{(190-1)\times 3^{2}+(186-1)\times 3^{2} }{190+186-2} }[/tex] = 3

So, the test statistics =   ~

                                     =  -2.908

The value of t-test statistics is -2.908.

Now, at a 0.05 level of significance, the t table gives a critical value of -1.645 at 374 degrees of freedom for the left-tailed test.

Since the value of our test statistics is less than the critical value of t as -2.908 < -1.645, so we have sufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as the test statistics will fall in the rejection region.

Therefore, we conclude that prenatal cocaine exposure is associated with lower scores of four-year-old children on the test of object assembly.

In the null hypothesis, a test always forecasts no effect, while the alternate theory states the research expectation impact, and calculation as follows:

Calculating the pooled estimator of [tex]\sigma^2[/tex], denoted by [tex]S^2_p[/tex], is defined by

[tex]\to \bold{S^2_p= \frac{(n_1 - 1) S^2_1+ (n_2 - 1)S^2_2}{n_1 + n_2 - 2}}[/tex]

Null hypothesis:

[tex]\to H_0 : \mu_1 - \mu_2 = \Delta_0\\[/tex]

Test statistic:

[tex]\to T_0=\frac{\bar{X_1}- \bar{X_2} -\Delta_0}{S_p \sqrt{\frac{1}{n_1}+\frac{1}{n_2}}} \\\\[/tex]

Alternative Hypothesis:

[tex]H_1 : \mu_1 -\mu_2 \neq \Delta_0\\\\ H_1 : \mu_1 -\mu_2 > \Delta_0\\\\H_1 : \mu_1 -\mu_2 < \Delta_0\\\\[/tex]

Rejection Criterion

[tex]t_0 > t_{\frac{\alpha}{2} , n_1+n_2 -2}\ \ \ or\ \ \ t_0 < - t_{\frac{\alpha}{2} , n_1+n_2 -2} \\\\t_o > t_{\alpha , n_1+n_2 -2} \\\\t_o > -t_{\alpha , n_1+n_2 -2}[/tex]

Given value:

[tex]\to S_p=9\\\\\to \Delta_0=0\\\\\to t_0=-\frac{0.9}{3(\sqrt{(\frac{1}{190}+\frac{1}{186})})}=-2.9\\\\\to t_{0.05,374}=1.645\\\\[/tex]

here

[tex]\to t_0 < -t_{0.05,374}[/tex]

hence rejecting the [tex]H_0[/tex]

Since there should be enough evidence that prenatal cocaine exposure is linked to inferior item assembly scores in 4-year-olds.

Find out more about the alternative hypothesis here:

brainly.com/question/18831983

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The answer is b

120.01 grams

A

(a) You're looking for

[tex]P(X\le 8) = \displaystyle \sum_{x=0}^8 P(X=x)[/tex]

where

[tex]P(X=x) = \begin{cases}\dfrac{\lambda^x e^{-\lambda}}{x!}&\text{if }x\in\{0,1,2,\ldots\}\\0&\text{otherwise}\end{cases}[/tex]

Customers arrive at a mean rate of 6 customers per 10 minutes, or equivalently 12 customers per 20 minutes, so

[tex]\lambda = \dfrac{12\,\rm customers}{20\,\rm min}\times(20\,\mathrm{min}) = 12\,\mathrm{customers}[/tex]

Then

[tex]\displaystyle P(X\le 8) = \sum_{x=0}^8 \frac{12^x e^{-12}}{x!} \approx \boxed{0.155}[/tex]

(b) Now you want

[tex]P(X\ge4) = 1 - P(X<4) = 1 - \displaystyle\sum_{x=0}^3 P(X=x)[/tex]

This time, we have

[tex]\lambda = \dfrac{6\,\rm customers}{10\,\rm min}\times(10\,\mathrm{min}) = 6\,\mathrm{customers}[/tex]

so that

[tex]P(X\ge4) = 1 - \displaystyle \sum_{x=0}^3 \frac{6^x e^{-6}}{x!} \approx \boxed{0.849}[/tex]

B

(a) In other words, you're asked to find the probability that more than 1 customer shows up in the same minute, or

[tex]P(X > 1) = 1 - P(X \le 1) = 1 - P(X=0) - P(X=1)[/tex]

with

[tex]\lambda = \dfrac{6\,\rm customers}{6\,\rm min}\times(1\,\mathrm{min}) = 1\,\mathrm{customer}[/tex]

So we have

[tex]P(X > 1) = 1 - \dfrac{1^0 e^{-1}}{0!} - \dfrac{1^1 e^{-1}}{1!} \approx \boxed{0.264}[/tex]

C

(a) Similar to B, you're looking for

[tex]P(X \le 1) = P(X=0) + P(X=1)[/tex]

with

[tex]\lambda = \dfrac{12\,\rm customers}{6\,\rm min}\times(1\,\mathrm{min}) = 2\,\mathrm{customers}[/tex]

so that

[tex]P(X\le1) = \dfrac{2^0e^{-2}}{0!} + \dfrac{2^1e^{-2}}{1!} \approx \boxed{0.406}[/tex]

Answer:

PLATO ANSWER

Step-by-step explanation:

x2 − x − 72

-8x + 56

5

those are the correct answers

Answer:

91 animals

Step-by-step explanation:

Because every elephant saw 3 monkeys, there were 9 * 3 = 27 monkeys and because every monkey had 1 tortoise in each hand and we know that monkeys have 2 hands, there were 27 * 2 = 54 tortoises. To find the total number of animals that were going to the river, we can calculate 1 + 9 + 27 + 54 = 91 animals.

Answer:

  10

Step-by-step explanation:

Only the rabbit and the 3 monkeys are described as going to the river. The tortoises seem to be going to the river by virtue of being taken there by the monkeys. Those on the path to the river were ...

  1 rabbit

  3 monkeys

  6 tortoises

A total of 10 animals.

Answer:

The answer is "Choice B, C, and F is correct".

Step-by-step explanation:

The following are choices, which is missing in the question, that can be defined as follows:

A) {x| x ≥ 3} is the domain.  

B) The set shall be {y| y ≥ –1}.  

C) over the interval  (–∞, 3), is the function, that decreases.  

D) it's over the duration the function increases its value, that is (–1, ∞).  

E) The symmetry axis will be x = – 1.  

F) vertex is (3, – 1).

Answer:

the answers are b, c, e

Step-by-step explanation:

i just took the test

Answer:

  0 ≤ x ≤ 10

Step-by-step explanation:

The domain of f(x) is the set of values of x for which the function is defined. Here, the square root function is only defined for non-negative arguments, so we require ...

  -x^2 +10x ≥ 0

  x(10 -x) ≥ 0

The two factors in this product will both be positive only for values ...

  0 ≤ x ≤ 10 . . . . the domain of f(x)

Answer:

16

Step-by-step explanation:

Follow the rules of PEMDAS

8÷2(2+2)

Parentheses

8÷2(4)

Exponents

we have none

Multiply and Divide from left to right

4(4)

16

Then Add and Subtract from left to right

Answer:

16

Step-by-step explanation:

In order to understand the answer to the problem, we need to know the correct order of operations, through the acronym PEMDAS

PEMDAS

P: Parentheses

E: Exponent

M: Multiply

D: Divide

A: Add

S: Subtract

First add everything in the parentheses to get 4

Then divide 8 by 2 to get 4

4 times 4 = 16

8/2= 4

2+2=4

4 x 4 = 16

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

Total Number of Cards = 52

Required

Probability of not picking a spade

Let P(S) represents the probability of picking a spade;

[tex]P(S) = \frac{n(S)}{Total}[/tex]

Where n(S) is the number of spades

[tex]n(S) = 13[/tex]

Substitute [tex]n(S) = 13[/tex] and 52 for Total

[tex]P(S) = \frac{13}{52}[/tex]

[tex]P(S) = \frac{1}{4}[/tex]

Let P(S') represents the probability of not picking a spade

In probability;

[tex]P(S) + P(S') = 1[/tex]

Substitute [tex]P(S) = \frac{1}{4}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{1}{4} + P(S') = 1[/tex]

[tex]P(S') = 1 - \frac{1}{4}[/tex]

[tex]P(S') = \frac{4-1}{4}[/tex]

[tex]P(S') = \frac{3}{4}[/tex]

[tex]P(S') = 0.75[/tex]

Hence, the probability of not selecting a spade is 3/4 or 0.75

Answer:

720

Step-by-step explanation:

It takes 240 cherries to make 3 pies.

9 pies are 3 times 3 pies, so it takes 3 times as many cherries.

3 * 240 cherries = 720 cherries.

[tex]\text{Find how many cherries is needed for 9 pies}\\\\\text{We know that there are 240 total cherries on 3 pies}\\\\\text{Now we need to find how many cherries will 9 pies need}\\\\\text{We simply have to multiply 240 by 3, since 3 multiplied by 3 is 9 pies}\\\text{So we would do the same with the cherries by multiplying it by 3}\\\\240\cdot3=720\\\\\boxed{\text{720 cherries}}[/tex]

julissa gave equal oranges in 6 apartments

she gave each apartment 5 oranges

so total no. of oranges are = 6×5 = 30

Answer:

D. 30

Step-by-step explanation: