los trabajadores de una mina se encuentran a 20 metros bajo tierra .Si excavan 3 metros desde alli suben otros 8 metros para coger una caretilla a que altura estaba la carretilla

Answer:

FALSE

TRUE

TRUE

Step-by-step explanation:

For median,

Arrange your numbers in numerical order.

Count how many numbers you have.

If you have an odd number, divide by 2 and round up to get the position of the median number.

If you have an even number, divide by 2. Go to the number in that position and average it with the number in the next higher position to get the median.

Source: https://www.verywellmind.com/how-to-identify-and-calculate-the-mean-median-or-mode-2795785

So for April median: 2.5, 3, 3.5, 3.5 (since we have 4 numbers we divide by 2 and we count by 2 places from left. Since we have even number data, we average 3 with the next higher position to get the median so (3+3.5)/2 = 3.25

For May apply same concept and you get median to be 2.25.

Median difference is 3.25-2.25 = 1

Therefore, statement 1 is false and statement 2 is true.

For average in May, add all numbers and divide by the number of data points so May= (2.5+3+3.5+3.5)/ 4 = 3.13

Apply same concept you for April and you get 2.38 as mean.

Mean difference is 3.13-2.38 = 0.75

Therefore, statement 3 is correct (true)

Answer:

It must be number 2.

1 and 3 number is wrong as parallelogram don't need have right angle

-> 4x= 66-10

-> 4x= 56

-> x= 56/4

-> x= 14

mark me brainliestttt plsss :)))

Answer:

x = 14.

Step-by-step explanation:

4x + 10 = 66

4x + 10 - 10 = 66 - 10

4x = 56

x = 56/4 = 14.

Answer:

1-(4×z) is the expression

Answer:

1 - 4z

Feel free to mark this as brainliest :D

Answer:

It's C, 4/3! Just did the question and got it right

Step-by-step explanation:

The limit of f(x) as x approaches negative 1 is four thirds.

Limits are defined as the value of a function as the input approaches a certain number. Limits are the concepts used essentially in calculus to define continuity, integrals and derivatives.

Given function is,

[tex]f(x) =\left \{ {{x^{2} -\frac{1}{3}x, x\neq -1 } \atop {-1, x=-1}} \right.[/tex]

We have to find the value of the limit as x approaches to negative 1.

This is not the same value as the value of the function at negative 1. Limit of the function as x approaches some value is the value of the function which is closest to the exact value of the function at the input.

We have,

f(x) = x² - [tex]\frac{1}{3}[/tex] x when x ≠ -1

Substitute x = -1 in the above equation

x² - [tex]\frac{1}{3}[/tex] x  = (-1)² - (1 / 3) (-1)

            = 1 + [tex]\frac{1}{3}[/tex]

            =  [tex]\frac{4}{3}[/tex]

[tex]\lim_{x \to -1} x^{2} -\frac{x}{3}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{4}{3}[/tex]

Hence the limit of f(x) = x² - [tex]\frac{1}{3}[/tex] x when x tends to -1 is 4/3.

To learn more about Limits, click on the link given below :

https://brainly.com/question/12207539

#SPJ2

Answer:

1/18

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\frac{1}{9}[/tex]÷2

make 2 a fraction

[tex]\frac{1}{9}[/tex]÷[tex]\frac{2}{1}[/tex]

cross multiply

1*1

9*2

[tex]\frac{1*1}{9*2}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{1}{18}[/tex]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

You always invert the second number in a division question and then multiply. This one is a little different. It has three levels. What do you do about that?

[tex]\frac{\frac{1}{9} }{\frac{2}{1} }[/tex]

Now you have a four level question which is handled the same way as all four level question.

Invert the bottom and multiply. Invert means turn upside down. So you turn the 2/1 upside down and you get 1/2

[tex]\frac{1}{9}*\frac{1}{2}[/tex]

What you get is 1/18 The green box with the question mark is a 1.

Answer:

take 28 degree as reference angle

using sine angle

sin28=p/h

0.46=10/h

0.46h=10

h=10/0.46

h=21.73

therefore hypotenuse =21.73

again using sine rule

take 25 degree as reference angle

sin 25=p/h

0.42=SR/21.73

0.42*21.73=SR

9.12=SR

9.1=SR

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

C. y = 8x

Step-by-step explanation:

Using the slope formula, we can calculate the rate of Marisol's and Timothy's Machines.

[tex]m = \frac{y_1-y_2}{x_1-x_2}[/tex]

Marisol:

[tex]m = \frac{18-12}{3-2} \\m=6[/tex]

Timothy:

[tex]m=\frac{54-36}{6-4} \\m=\frac{18}{2} \\m=9[/tex]

Now that we know the rate of their machines, we need to choose a rate that is between 6 and 9. Therefore, the rate of Zorian's machine needs to be y = 8x.

Answer:

Solution given:

1.

diameter(d)=6mm

base(b)=8mm

height (h)=5mm

Area of figure=area of parallelogram +area of semi circle

2.

for triangle

base[b]=6ft

height(h)=9ft

for square

length[l]=9ft

Area of figure=area of square +area of triangle

Answer:

11.69

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that y2 is directly proportional to the cube of x and y is always positive. then;

y² = kx³

if y = 18 when x =4

18² = k4³

324 = 64k

k  = 324/64

k = 5.0625

To get y when x = 3

Recall

y² = kx³

y² = (324/64)3³

y² = 324/64 * 27

y² = 136.6875

y = √136.6875

y = 11.69

Hence the value of y is 11.69

value of. when x = 3 if y = 18 when x =4

A) 27 B) 11.67 C) 29

Answer: The coefficient of determination = 0.6291

Step-by-step explanation:

Given: Total variation is 24.488, the explained variation is 15.405, and the unexplained variation is 9.083.

The coefficient of determination is computed as:

[tex]\text{ coefficient of determination} =\frac{\text{explained variation }}{\text{total variation}}[/tex]

Substituting given values, we get

[tex]\text{coefficient of determination} =\frac{15.405}{24.488}[/tex]

[tex]=0.6291[/tex]

Therefore, the coefficient of determination = 0.6291

The answer is A which is 30. :D

Answer:

30

Step-by-step explanation:

2x + x - 10 = 80

3x - 10 = 80

3x (- 10 + 10)= 80 + 10

3x = 90

3x/3 = 90/3

x = 30

Answer:

H0 : the treatment has no effect

Step-by-step explanation:

The test is formulated as hypothesis . Here the test ist that whether the treatment has  affected or not . So the null hypothesis can be formulated as

H0 : the treatment has no effect

against the claim

Ha: the treatment has an effect.

The null hypothesis  is the test performed and the alternate hypothesis is the claim against the test. Therefore they are opposite of each other.

Answer:

5/27

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

-2,0

Step-by-step explanation:

See the steps below:)

Answer:

[tex]0.4138[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

[tex]x \to storm[/tex]

[tex]\mu_x = 1.0[/tex]

[tex]y \to fire[/tex]

[tex]\mu_y = 1.5[/tex]

[tex]z \to theft[/tex]

[tex]\mu_z = 2.4[/tex]

Let the event that the above three factors is greater than 3 be represented as:

[tex]P(A > 3)[/tex]

Using complement rule, we have:

[tex]P(A > 3) = 1 - P(A \le 3)[/tex]

This gives:

[tex]P(A > 3) = 1 - P(\{x \le 3\}\ n\ \{y \le 3\}\ n \{z \le 3\}\)[/tex]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The exponential distribution formula of each is:

[tex]P(x \le k) = 1 - e^{-\frac{k}{\mu}}[/tex]

So, we have:

[tex]k = 3; \mu_x = 1[/tex]

[tex]P(x \le 3) = 1 - e^{-\frac{3}{1}} = 1 - e^{-3} = 0.9502[/tex]

[tex]k=3; \mu_y = 1.5[/tex]

[tex]P(y \le 3) = 1 - e^{-\frac{3}{1.5}} = 1 - e^{-2} = 0.8647[/tex]

[tex]k = 3; \mu_z = 2.4[/tex]

[tex]P(z \le 3) = 1 - e^{-\frac{3}{2.4}} = 1 - e^{-1.25} = 0.7135[/tex]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[tex]P(A > 3) = 1 - P(\{x \le 3\}\ n\ \{y \le 3\}\ n \{z \le 3\}\)[/tex]

[tex]P(A > 3) = 1 - (0.9502 * 0.8647 *0.7135)[/tex]

[tex]P(A > 3) = 1 - 0.5862[/tex]

[tex]P(A > 3) = 0.4138[/tex]

Answer:

7 yards

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

w = 6ft 8in

Step-by-step explanation:

the proportions will be the same

w/7.5 = 12/13.5

multiply both sides by 7.5

w = 12/13.5 * 7.5

w = 6.6666666667ft

w = 6ft 8in

The original truck was 6.67 feet wide.

"It is a comparison of two or more numbers that indicates their sizes in relation to each other."

"It is an equation in which two ratios are set equal to each other."

For given example,

A model truck is 13.5 inches long 7.5 inches wide.

The ratio of length to width of a model truck would be,

13.5 : 7.5                       ...........................(1)

The original truck was 12 feet long.

This means the original truck was 144 inches long.

Let 'x' be the width (in inches) of the original truck.

So, the ratio of the length to the width of the original truck would be,

144 : x                           .................................(2)

Also, the ratios given by (1) and (2) must be in proportion.

[tex]\Rightarrow \frac{13.5}{7.5} = \frac{144}{x} \\\\\Rightarrow 13.5 \times x = 144 \times 7.5\\\\\Rightarrow \bold{x=80~inches}\\\\\Rightarrow \bold{x=6.67~feet}[/tex]

Therefore, the original truck was 6.67 feet wide.

Learn more about ratio and proportion here:

https://brainly.com/question/26974513

#SPJ2

Answer:

4

Step-by-step explanation:

2m−13=−8m+27

2m+8m=27+13

10m=40

m=40÷10

Therefore, m=4

Answer:

2m - 13 = -8m +27

2m + 8m = 27 + 13

10m = 40

m = 4

Answer:

X = 0, -4

Step-by-step explanation:

Symbolab helped

Answer:

SA = 484 cm²

Step-by-step explanation:

Surface area of the composite figure = surface area of the larger rectangular prism + (surface area of the smaller rectangular prism - base area of the smaller rectangular prism)

✔️Surface are of the larger rectangular prism = 2(LW + LH + WH)

L = 7 cm

W = 7 cm

H = 12 cm

S.A = 2(7*7 + 7*12 + 7*12) = 434 cm²

✔️Surface are of the smaller rectangular prism = 2(LW + LH + WH)

L = 7 cm

W = 2 cm

H = 2 cm

S.A = 2(7*2 + 7*2 + 2*2) = 64 cm²

✔️Base area of the smaller rectangular prism = L*W

L = 7 cm

W = 2 cm

Area = 7*2 = 14 cm²

✅Surface area of the composite figure = 434 + (64 - 14)

= 434 + 50

= 484 cm²

Answer:

There is not enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis.

Their sum is greater than the probability value ,  the data does not fit the experiment and the null is  accepted.

Step-by-step explanation:

There are 3 colors so degrees of freedom = 3-1 = 2

The chi square value = 0.85

The p value for chi square =0.85 for 2 degrees of freedom for the left tailed test to be 0.34623 for 0.1,0.05 and 0.01 significance level.

There is not enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis.

The  p value for chi square =0.85 for 2 degrees of freedom for the right tailed test to be 0.65377 for 0.1,0.05 and 0.01 significance level.

There is not enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis.

Their sum is greater than the probability value ,  the data does not fit the experiment and the null is  accepted.

Answer:

57.5

Step-by-step explanation:

The expected frequency of West Campus and Failed :

Let :

Failed = F

East Campus = C

West Campus = W

Passed = P

Frequency of FnW :

[(FnE) + (FnW) * (PnW) + (FnW)] / total samples

[(52 + 63) * (63 + 37)] / 200

[(115 * 100)] / 200

11500 / 200

= 57.5

n(Failed n East campus)

Answer:

57.5

Step-by-step explanation:

Got it right on the test.

all of the above which is e

Answer:

The answer here depends on whether you want to do them individually or collectively.  If we go individually, then:

The vertical scaling gives us y = 3x³

The vertical translation gives us y = x³ + 4

The horizontal translation gives us y = (x + 2)³

On the other hand, if we want to apply all three at the same time, we get:

starting with a vertical scaling of 3, we get:

start with scaling: y = 3x³

add vertical translation: y = 3x³ + 4

and finally add horizontal translation: y = 3(x + 2)³ + 4

Answer:

0.1131 = 11.31% probability that a randomly selected stock will close up $0.75 or more.

Step-by-step explanation:

Normal Probability Distribution:

Problems of normal distributions can be solved using the z-score formula.

In a set with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the z-score of a measure X is given by:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the p-value, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.

Normally distributed with a mean of $0.35 and a standard deviation of $0.33.

This means that [tex]\mu = 0.35, \sigma = 0.33[/tex].

What is the probability that a randomly selected stock will close up $0.75 or more?

This is 1 subtracted by the p-value of Z when X = 0.75. So

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{0.75 - 0.35}{0.33}[/tex]

[tex]Z = 1.21[/tex]

[tex]Z = 1.21[/tex] has a p-value of 0.8869.

1 - 0.8869 = 0.1131

0.1131 = 11.31% probability that a randomly selected stock will close up $0.75 or more.