Lindsey tells her friend Erin that she’s going to run to the store for some bread. Lindsey asks why Erin doesn’t just take the car. This misunderstanding was due to a linguistic fallacy.
What is a linguistic fallacy?A linguistic fallacy is an error in reasoning resulting from the misuse of language. The linguistic fallacy is a fallacy that arises from a misunderstanding of words or language.
It is a form of fallacy that occurs when the speaker uses a word or language in a way that is not consistent with its standard meaning or commonly accepted definition.
The linguistic fallacy happens when one misinterprets the words spoken by another. In the given scenario, the linguistic fallacy took place as Lindsey said she was going to run to the store for some bread, but Erin misunderstood her, thinking that she was going to run instead of using the car.
Hence, it can be said that this misunderstanding was due to a linguistic fallacy.
Read more about Fallacy at https://brainly.com/question/14669739
#SPJ11
If something is a bird, then it flies. A 747 flies, therefore it is a bird. This is an example of: modus ponens and valid modus tollens and valid Caffirming the consequent and a fallacy denying the antecendent and a fallacy QUESTION 4 What is a priori knowledge? Knowledge taught by an authority. Knowledge through intuition. Knowledge after looking out into the world. Knowledge before looking out into the world.
A priori knowledge is knowledge before looking out into the world. Option d is correct.
A priori knowledge refers to knowledge that is independent of experience or observation. It is knowledge that is obtained or justified through reasoning, deduction, or logic rather than through empirical evidence. A priori knowledge is often considered to be innate or existing prior to any sensory experience.
Examples of a priori knowledge include mathematical truths (such as "2 + 2 = 4"), logical principles (such as the law of non-contradiction), and certain philosophical truths (such as "all bachelors are unmarried"). These statements can be known to be true or false without relying on any specific observations or empirical data.
In contrast, a posteriori knowledge refers to knowledge that is obtained through experience, observation, or empirical evidence. This type of knowledge relies on sensory perception and the collection of information from the external world.
Therefore, d is correct.
Learn more about priori knowledge https://brainly.com/question/10795800
#SPJ11