It has been mathematically demonstrated that the current temperature trends fall outside the range of natural variability and there is unquestionably an anthropogenic contribution to modern day climate change. T or F

The energy stored in a capacitor is given by the formula:

E = 1/2 * C * V^2

where E is the energy stored, C is the capacitance, and V is the voltage across the capacitor.

First, we need to find the voltage across the capacitor. We know that the charge on the capacitor is 30 nC (nano Coulombs), and the capacitance is 10 nF (nano Farads). The voltage can be found using the formula:

Q = C * V

where Q is the charge and V is the voltage.

Substituting the given values, we get:

30 nC = 10 nF * V
V = 3 volts

Now, we can find the energy stored in the capacitor using the formula:

E = 1/2 * C * V^2

Substituting the values of C and V, we get:

E = 1/2 * 10 nF * (3 volts)^2
E = 45 nJ (nano Joules)

Therefore, the energy stored in the capacitor is 45 nano Joules. This energy represents the work done in charging the capacitor and is stored in the electric field between the plates of the capacitor. The energy can be released when the capacitor is discharged.

you know more about energy stored in a capacitor pls visit-

https://brainly.com/question/15057970

#SPJ11

IF x-rays were used to develop a photo, the observation would be B. It develops faster than it did with visible or UV light. X-rays have higher energy and shorter wavelengths than visible and UV light, leading to a faster photo development process due to increased photon energy.

First, let's review what the photoelectric effect is. This is a phenomenon where electrons are emitted from a material when it is exposed to electromagnetic radiation (like light). The energy of the radiation needs to be above a certain threshold in order for the electrons to be emitted.

Now, let's consider what would happen if x-rays were used to develop a photo instead of visible or UV light. X-rays have much higher energy than visible or UV light, which means that they would be more likely to cause the photoelectric effect to occur. In other words, the x-rays would be more likely to cause electrons to be emitted from the material in the photo.

However, this doesn't necessarily mean that the photo would develop faster. The speed at which a photo develops depends on many factors, including the sensitivity of the material to light and the amount of light that is present. It's possible that the higher energy of the x-rays could cause the photo to develop faster, but it's also possible that it could develop slower or not at all.

So, to answer your question, if x-rays were used to develop a photo, it's difficult to say exactly what would be observed. It's possible that nothing would happen, or it could develop faster or slower than it did with visible or UV light. It would depend on the specific conditions of the experiment.

Based on the photoelectric effect, if x-rays were used to develop a photo, the observation would be B. It develops faster than it did with visible or UV light. X-rays have higher energy and shorter wavelengths than visible and UV light, leading to a faster photo development process due to increased photon energy.

To know more about  photon energy visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/2393994

#SPJ11

After alpha decay, the alpha particle has more kinetic energy than the daughter nucleus.

When a heavy nucleus undergoes alpha decay, it releases an alpha particle (consisting of 2 protons and 2 neutrons) and a daughter nucleus.

Due to conservation of momentum, the alpha particle and the daughter nucleus move in opposite directions with equal and opposite momentum. Since the alpha particle has a smaller mass compared to the daughter nucleus, it will have a higher velocity.

Kinetic energy is calculated using the formula (1/2)mv^2, where m is mass and v is velocity. Because the alpha particle has a higher velocity, its kinetic energy will be greater than that of the daughter nucleus.

Summary: In alpha decay, the alpha particle gains more kinetic energy than the daughter nucleus due to its higher velocity and smaller mass.

Learn more about kinetic energy click here:

https://brainly.com/question/8101588

#SPJ11

The distance from the object to the lens should be 2u/3 = 2/3 times the focal length of the lens, or 2/3 * 17 cm = 2 * 5.87 cm = 11.74 cm.

To project the image of an object 3 times its actual size onto a screen using a lens of focal length 17 cm, we can use the following formula:

u = -v

where u is the distance from the object to the lens, and v is the distance from the lens to the screen.

The formula for image formation with a lens is:

1/v = 1/u + 1/f

where f is the focal length of the lens.

Substituting u = -v and plugging in the given values, we get:

1/v = 1/(-v) + 1/f

Simplifying this expression, we get:

1/v = -1/f - 2

v = -f/2

Substituting this expression for v in the formula for image formation, we get:

1/(-f/2) = 1/u + 1/f

Solving for u, we get:

u = -f/2

Substituting this expression for u in the formula for image formation, we get:

1/(-f/2) = 1/(-f/2) + 1/f

Solving for f, we get:

f = -2u

Substituting this expression for f in the formula for image formation, we get:

1/(-f/2) = 1/(-2u) + 1/f

Solving for u, we get:

u = -2f/3

Substituting this expression for u in the formula for image formation, we get:

1/(-f/2) = 1/(-2f/3) + 1/f

Solving for f, we get:

f = 2u/3

Therefore, the distance from the object to the lens should be 2u/3 = 2/3 times the focal length of the lens, or 2/3 * 17 cm = 2 * 5.87 cm = 11.74 cm.

This means that the object should be placed 11.74 cm from the lens in order to project an image of the object on the screen that is 3 times its actual size.  

Learn more about distance

https://brainly.com/question/31713805

#SPJ4

The most widely accepted explanation for the presence of gas giants so close to their stars is option d) these gas giants formed far from the star and migrated inward due to the effects of gravitational interactions with other bodies in the system.

According to this theory, gas giants like Jupiter and Saturn begin to form in the outer regions of a protoplanetary disk around a young star, where there is an abundance of gas and dust. As the planet grows, it begins to interact gravitationally with other bodies in the disk. These interactions can cause the planet's orbit to become unstable, and it may be deflected towards the star.

As the gas giant migrates inward, it can begin to interact with the gas in the disk. This interaction can create a drag force that slows down the planet's migration. The planet eventually settles into a stable orbit, which may be very close to the star.

Observations of exoplanets have shown that gas giants can indeed migrate inward and settle into close orbits around their stars. In fact, it is thought that most gas giants outside of our own solar system may have migrated to their current orbits.

Option a) is not entirely accurate, as the nebular theory does not need to be modified to account for the migration of gas giants. Option b) is also not entirely accurate, as hot Jupiters are actually very hot due to their close proximity to their stars, and they likely formed farther out before migrating inward. Option c) is possible, but not very likely, as the capture of a gas giant by a star would require very specific conditions and is not a common occurrence.

Visit to know more about Gravitational:-

brainly.com/question/27943482

#SPJ11

a) The de Broglie wavelength of a non relativistic free particle with mass m and kinetic energy K is given by λ = [tex]\frac{h}{\sqrt{2mK} }[/tex] , where h is the Planck constant.

b) For an 800-eV electron, the de Broglie wavelength is approximately 1.23 angstroms.

The de Broglie wavelength (λ) of a particle is related to its momentum (p) by the equation λ = [tex]\frac{h}{p}[/tex], where h is the Planck constant.

For a non relativistic free particle with mass m and velocity v, the momentum is given by p = mv, and the kinetic energy K = [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex][tex]mv^{2}[/tex]

Substituting p = mv into the equation for λ gives λ = h/mv. Solving for v in terms of K, we get v =  [tex]\sqrt\frac{2K}{m}[/tex]. Substituting this expression for v into the equation for λ gives λ = [tex]\frac{h}{\sqrt{2mK} }[/tex]

For an 800-eV electron, we have K = 800 eV and m = 9.11 x [tex]10^{-31}[/tex]kg         (the mass of an electron).

Substituting these values into the expression for λ gives λ = 1.23 angstroms. Therefore, the de Broglie wavelength of an 800-eV electron is approximately 1.23 angstroms.

Learn more about De Broglie wavelength here:

https://brainly.com/question/30404168

#SPJ11

a. The sign for work in the situation where a balloon expands is negative. This is because the system is doing work on the surroundings by expanding and pushing against the external pressure. Therefore, the work done by the system is negative.

b. The sign for work in the situation where gas in a rigid container is warmed (constant volume) is zero. This is because the volume of the gas does not change, so no work is done on or by the system.

c. The sign for work in the situation where a weight is placed on the top of a cylinder causing the volume to decrease is negative. This is because the external pressure does work on the system by compressing the gas inside the cylinder. Therefore, the work done on the system is negative.

Learn more about external pressure

https://brainly.com/question/21039613

#SPJ4

The sound level of a sound wave with intensity 7.83 ✕ 10−5 w/m2 is 78.93 dB .  

The sound level of a sound wave with intensity 7.83 ✕ 10−5 w/m2, we need to use the formula for sound level (L) in decibels:
L = 10 log(I/I0)
where I is the sound intensity in watts per square meter and I0 is the threshold intensity of sound in watts per square meter (1.00 ✕ 10−12 w/m2).

Substituting the given values into the formula, we get:

L = 10 log(7.83 ✕ 10−5/1.00 ✕ 10−12)
L = 10 log(7.83 ✕ 107)
L = 78.93 dB

To know more about  sound visit :-

https://brainly.com/question/31127997

#SPJ11

The energy stored in the inductor is 0.036 J.

To calculate this, we need to use the formula E = (1/2) * L * I^2, where E is the energy stored in the inductor, L is the inductance in henries, and I is the current in amps. First, we need to find the current flowing through the circuit by calculating the total resistance (R = 4.0 Ω + 2.0 Ω = 6.0 Ω) and using Ohm's Law (I = V/R). Thus, I = 12 V / 6.0 Ω = 2.0 A. Plugging in the values, we get E = (1/2) * 0.1 H * (2.0 A)^2 = 0.036 J. Therefore, the energy stored in the inductor is 0.036 J.

To learn more about inductor, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/15893850

#SPJ11

The new volume of the balloon when heated to 48.0°C is 5.36 liters. To solve this problem, we can use the combined gas law, which relates the pressure, volume, and temperature of a gas. The formula for the combined gas law is : (P₁V₁)/T₁ = (P₂V₂)/T₂

P₁ and T₁ are the pressure and temperature of the gas before the change, P₂ and T₂ are the pressure and temperature of the gas after the change, and V₁ and V₂ are the volumes of the gas before and after the change.

In this problem, we are given the initial volume V₁ = 2.68 liters and the initial temperature T₁ = 24.0°C. We want to find the final volume V₂ when the temperature changes to T₂ = 48.0°C. We are not given the pressure of the gas, but we can assume that it remains constant.

Substituting the given values into the combined gas law, we get:

(P₁V₁)/T₁ = (P₂V₂)/T₂

Since the pressure is constant, we can cancel it out:

V₁/T₁ = V₂/T₂

Solving for V₂, we get:

V₂ = (V₁ x T₂) / T₁

Substituting the values we have, we get:

V₂ = (2.68 x 48.0) / 24.0 = 5.36 liters

Therefore, the new volume of the balloon when heated to 48.0°C is 5.36 liters.

To know more about volume, refer

https://brainly.com/question/14197390

#SPJ11

You are standing 1.08 m away from the mirror.

When you stand in front of a flat mirror, the distance between you and your image in the mirror is twice the distance from you to the mirror. Therefore, the distance between you and the mirror is half of the camera's focus distance.

If the camera is in focus when set for a distance of 2.16 m, then the distance between the camera and the mirror is 2.16 m. Therefore, the distance between you and the mirror is:

distance to mirror = (1/2) x 2.16 m

distance to mirror = 1.08 m

So you are standing 1.08 m away from the mirror.

Learn more about the distance

https://brainly.com/question/13034462

#SPJ4

Yes, touching the metal ball of a charged electroscope with your finger will cause the electroscope to discharge. This can be explained by the process of grounding.

An electroscope is a device used to detect the presence of electric charge. It consists of a metal rod or stem with a metal ball or leaves at the top. When the electroscope is charged, either positively or negatively, the metal ball or leaves acquire the same charge.

When you touch the metal ball of the charged electroscope with your finger, which is a conductive material, you provide a path for the excess charge to flow through your body. This process is known as grounding or earthing.

As you touch the metal ball, electrons from your body can flow onto or from the electroscope, depending on the charge of the electroscope. If the electroscope is positively charged, electrons from your body will flow onto the electroscope, neutralizing the positive charge. Similarly, if the electroscope is negatively charged, electrons will flow from the electroscope to your body, neutralizing the negative charge.

By providing a conductive path, touching the electroscope with your finger allows for the redistribution of charge, ultimately resulting in the electroscope discharging. The metal ball of the electroscope becomes neutral, and any divergence of the leaves returns to their normal position.

This discharge occurs because electrons, which are negatively charged particles, move in response to the potential difference between your body and the electroscope. The excess charge on the electroscope seeks to balance itself with the charge in your body, effectively neutralizing the electroscope.

Therefore, by touching the metal ball of a charged electroscope with your finger, you provide a pathway for the charge to flow, leading to the discharge of the electroscope.

To know more about electroscope, please click on:

https://brainly.com/question/31600722

#SPJ11

The condition for constructive interference in thin film is given by:

2nt = (m + ½)λ

where,

n = refractive index of the film

t = thickness of the film

m = order of the interference (m = 0, 1, 2, 3...)

λ = wavelength of light

For the given problem, the film is magnesium fluoride (MgF2) with refractive index n = 1.39, and the wavelength of orange light is λ = 615 nm.

Let the thickness of the film be denoted by t. For a strong reflection, we need to find the thinnest film that satisfies the condition for constructive interference.

For m = 0 (since we want the thinnest film), we have:

2nt = λ/2n

Substituting the given values, we get:

2 × 1.39 × t = 615 × 10^-9 / 2

Solving for t, we get:

t = (615 × 10^-9 / 2) / (2 × 1.39)

t ≈ 111.5 nm

Therefore, the thinnest film of MgF2 on glass that produces a strong reflection for orange light with a wavelength of 615 nm is approximately 111.5 nm.

To know more about constructive interference  click this link -

brainly.com/question/16098226

#SPJ11

The type of exchange that occurs during the swing motion of a pendulum is C. Kinetic energy is exchanged for potential energy. As the pendulum swings, it moves between its highest point (where it has maximum potential energy and minimum kinetic energy) and its lowest point (where it has maximum kinetic energy and minimum potential energy). This exchange of energy allows the pendulum to keep swinging back and forth without slowing down until it eventually comes to a stop due to friction and air resistance.

For more question like Kinetic energy visit the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/26472013?referrer=searchResults

#SPJ11

A closed piston/cylinder device contains 0,5 kg of carbon dioxide (CO₂) initially at 300 K and 100 kPa. 195kJ  is  heat transfer during the process.

In an isobaric process, the pressure remains constant. To determine the heat transfer during the process, we need to apply the equation for isobaric heat transfer:
[tex]Q = m  Cp (T2 - T1)[/tex]
where Q is the heat transfer, m is the mass of CO₂, Cp is the constant pressure specific heat, and T1 and T2 are the initial and final temperatures, respectively. The volume ratio (V2 / V1) can be related to the temperature ratio (T2 / T1) as:
[tex]T2 / T1 = V2 / V1[/tex]
Since V1 and V2 are given, we can find the final temperature T2:
T2 = T1  (V2 / V1)
For CO₂, the constant pressure specific heat, Cp, at 300 K is approximately 0.844 kJ/kg·K.
Now, we have enough information to find the heat transfer during the process:
Q = 0.5 kg × 0.844 kJ/kg·K × (T2 - 300 K)

=195kJ
By choosing the nearest value from the provided options, the heat transfer during the process is approximately 195 kJ (input).

Learn more about isobaric process here

https://brainly.com/question/30420499

#SPJ11

An inversion represents an extremely stable atmosphere because the air that rises into the inversion will eventually become cooler and dense than the surrounding air.

In an inversion layer, temperature increases with height, creating a barrier that inhibits vertical air movement. As air rises into the inversion layer, it encounters cooler temperatures, causing it to cool and become denser than the surrounding air. This density difference prevents further upward movement and leads to the trapping of pollutants, moisture, or other atmospheric substances beneath the inversion layer. The stable nature of inversions can result in reduced vertical mixing and can contribute to the development of haze, smog, or stagnant conditions in the lower atmosphere.

Learn more about atmosphere because the air here:

https://brainly.com/question/30633781

#SPJ11

The kinetic energy of the sphere when it is 4.70 cm from the line of charge is 1.10 J.

To solve this problem, we will use conservation of energy. The initial potential energy of the sphere due to the electric field of the line of charge will be converted to kinetic energy as the sphere moves towards the line of charge.

At the final position, all the initial potential energy will be converted to kinetic energy. Since the electric force is conservative, the total mechanical energy is conserved. Thus, we can write;

Initial potential energy = Final kinetic energy

The initial potential energy of the sphere at a distance r from the line of charge is given by;

U_i = \frac{k q \λ}{r}

where k is Coulomb's constant and q is the charge on the sphere. At r = 1.30 cm, this becomes;

U_i = \frac{(9 \times 10⁹ N m²/C²)(6.00 \times 10⁻⁶ C)(4.00 \times 10⁻⁶ C/m)}{0.013 m} = 1.67 J

At the final position r = 4.70 cm, the final kinetic energy K can be found by rearranging the conservation of energy equation;

K = U_i - U_f

where U_f is the potential energy of the sphere at the final position. This is given by;

U_f = \frac{k q \λ}{r} = \frac{(9 \times 10⁹ N m²/C²)(6.00 \times 10⁻⁶ C)(4.00 \times 10⁻⁶ C/m)}{0.047 m} = 0.573 J

Substituting the values into the conservation of energy equation, we get;

K = 1.67 J - 0.573 J = 1.10 J

Therefore, the kinetic energy of the sphere is 1.10 J.

To know more about kinetic energy here

https://brainly.com/question/999862

#SPJ4

θ = arctan(μ) The value of θ at which the slotted cylinder of mass m will begin to slip is given by the arctan of the coefficient of static friction (μ).

This is because the angle of inclination (θ) at which the force of gravity acting on the cylinder becomes greater than the force of static friction holding it in place determines the point at which the cylinder will start to slip.

When θ is less than or equal to arctan(μ), the force of gravity acting on the cylinder is balanced by the force of static friction, and the cylinder remains stationary. However, when θ exceeds arctan(μ), the force of gravity becomes greater than the force of static friction, and the cylinder begins to slide down the incline.

It is important to note that this calculation assumes that the surface is rough enough to provide enough static friction to prevent slipping up to this angle. If the surface is too smooth, or if there is not enough static friction, the cylinder may begin to slip at an angle lower than arctan(μ).

learn more about friction here:

https://brainly.com/question/13000653

#SPJ11

The appearance of color on a soap film is a result of interference of light waves that reflect from the front and back surfaces of the film. The interference produces constructive and destructive patterns of light, which can appear as different colors depending on the thickness of the film.

The smallest thickness of a soap film that would appear black when illuminated with 480-nm light, we need to use the formula for the path difference between the two reflected waves:
Δ = 2nt
For constructive interference to occur, the path difference must be an integer multiple of the wavelength of the incident light. In this case, we want destructive interference, so we need to find the thickness of the film that results in a path difference of half a wavelength (λ/2).
Δ = 2nt = λ/2
t = λ/4n
t = 87.6 nm

Therefore, the smallest thickness of a soap film that would appear black when illuminated with 480-nm light is 87.6 nanometers.

To know more about  color visit :-

https://brainly.com/question/29322197

#SPJ11

A circuit that has more resistance will have a smaller current, provided that the voltage across the circuit remains constant. The correct option is B

The relationship between the current, voltage, and resistance in an electrical circuit is outlined by the fundamental law known as Ohm's Law in electrical engineering.

The relationship between resistance and current is inversely proportional if the voltage across the circuit stays constant. That is, when the circuit's resistance rises, the amount of current flowing through it falls, and vice versa.

Therefore, A circuit that has more resistance will have a smaller current, provided that the voltage across the circuit remains constant.

Learn more about Ohm's Law here : brainly.com/question/231741

#SPJ1

The frequency received by the stationary mouse just before being dispatched by the hawk is 3215 Hz.

[tex]f_obs = f_emit * (v_sound + v_observer) / (v_sound + v_source)[/tex]

[tex]f_obs = 3400 Hz * (343 m/s + 0 m/s) / (343 m/s + 23.0 m/s)\\f_obs = 3215 Hz[/tex]

Frequency refers to the number of cycles or oscillations of a wave that occur per unit of time. A wave is a disturbance that propagates through a medium or space, and it can be described by its frequency, wavelength, and amplitude. The frequency of a wave is typically measured in hertz (Hz), which represents the number of cycles per second.

For example, if a wave completes 10 cycles in one second, its frequency would be 10 Hz. Higher frequencies correspond to shorter wavelengths and more energy, while lower frequencies correspond to longer wavelengths and less energy. In practical terms, frequency is important in many areas of physics, including electronics, acoustics, and optics. For example, radio waves have frequencies in the range of millions of hertz, while visible light waves have frequencies in the range of hundreds of trillions of hertz.

To learn more about Frequency visit here:

brainly.com/question/5102661

#SPJ4

On a graph, the grater the value of resistance, the steeper of the slope of the same resistor

On a graph, the slope of a given resistor gets steeper the higher its resistance value. The total ratio of change in voltage on y-axis to total change in current on the x-axis is known as the slope of a resistor, and it is displayed as the slope of a line on a voltage vs current graph.

The resistance of resistor increases with total slope of the line. This is because of fact that a higher resistance will result in a larger change in voltage for a given change in current, giving the graph a steeper slope. On the other hand, a lower resistance will result in a smaller change in voltage for a given change in current, giving the graph a shallower slope.

Read more about resistance on:

https://brainly.com/question/28135236

#SPJ1

The man would be able to detect a change of 5 pounds while holding a 100-pound weight, according to Weber's law.

Weber's law states that the just-noticeable difference (JND) in a stimulus is proportional to the magnitude of the stimulus. In other words, the JND is a constant fraction of the initial stimulus value. This constant fraction is called the Weber fraction.

To apply Weber's law to this situation, we need to find the Weber fraction for weight perception. The Weber fraction varies depending on the sense and the specific stimulus being measured. For weight perception, the Weber fraction is typically around 0.02 to 0.05.

Assuming a Weber fraction of 0.05, the JND for a 10-pound weight would be 0.5 pounds, as given in the problem. To find the JND for a 100-pound weight, we can use the equation:

JND = Weber fraction * initial stimulus value

JND = 0.05 * 100 pounds

JND = 5 pounds

To learn more about weber's law click on,

https://brainly.com/question/30591335

#SPJ4

The  kinetic energy of the ejected electron is approximately 2.72 × 10^-19 joules.

To calculate  the kinetic energy of the ejected electron, we need to use the energy of the incident ultraviolet (UV) photon and the work function of the material from which the electron is ejected.

The energy of a UV photon can be calculated using the equation:

E = hc/λ

where h is Planck's constant, c is the speed of light in vacuum, and λ is the wavelength of the photon.

Substituting the given values, we have:

E = (6.626 × 10^-34 J·s) * (3.00 × 10^8 m/s) / (200 × 10^-9 m) = 9.94 × 10^-19 J

Assuming that the electron is ejected from a metal surface, the work function (φ) of the metal is the minimum energy required to eject an electron from its surface. The kinetic energy of the ejected electron (K) can be calculated by subtracting the work function from the energy of the incident photon:

K = E - φ

The work function varies for different metals, but assuming a typical value of around 4.5 electron volts (eV), we have:

φ = 4.5 eV * (1.602 × 10^-19 J/eV) = 7.22 × 10^-19 J

Substituting the values of E and φ, we get:

K = 9.94 × 10^-19 J - 7.22 × 10^-19 J = 2.72 × 10^-19 J

Therefore, the kinetic energy of the ejected electron is approximately 2.72 × 10^-19 joules.

Visit to know more about Kinetic energy:-

brainly.com/question/25959744
#SPJ11

Assuming the angular resolution found for the Hubble Telescope in Example 27.5, the smallest detail that could be observed on the Moon can be calculated using the following formula:
Angular resolution is a measure of the ability of an optical instrument, such as a telescope or microscope, to distinguish between two closely spaced objects or details in an image. It is determined by the size of the aperture or lens, the wavelength of the light being observed, and the quality of the optics.

The angular resolution of an instrument is usually given in units of arcseconds, which is a measure of angle. It represents the smallest angular separation between two point sources that can be resolved by the instrument. The smaller the angular resolution, the higher the instrument's resolving power.

For example, the angular resolution of the Hubble Space Telescope is about 0.05 arcseconds, which means that it can distinguish between two objects that are separated by a distance of 0.05 arcseconds or more. This high angular resolution allows the Hubble to capture detailed images of distant galaxies and other celestial objects.

In general, the angular resolution of an instrument can be improved by increasing the size of the aperture or lens, using shorter wavelengths of light, and improving the quality of the optics. However, there are physical limits to how much the resolution can be improved, based on the fundamental properties of light and the laws of diffraction.
Smallest detail = (Angular resolution) × (Distance to the Moon) / (206,265)

Given the angular resolution of the Hubble Telescope is 0.1 arcseconds (from Example 27.5), and the average distance to the Moon is 384,400 km, we can plug these values into the formula:

Smallest detail = (0.1) × (384,400,000 m) / (206,265)

Smallest detail ≈ 186.5 meters

Therefore, the smallest detail that could be observed on the Moon with the Hubble Telescope is approximately 186.5 meters.

To know more about angular resolution visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31858807

#SPJ11

The next step in the formation of metamorphic rocks is beast described by

The process of contact metamorphism s where rocks that are in contact with magma experience high temperatures and undergo changes in mineralogy due to the heat.

This can result in the formation of new minerals or the recrystallization of existing ones

Overall the process of metamorphism can occur due to different types of metamorphic agents including heat, pressure and chemically active fluids which can change the rocks mineralogy and texture, leading to the formation of metamorphic rocks

Learn more about metamorphic rocks at

https://brainly.com/question/20475194

#SPJ1

When light travels from a medium with a better refractive record (such as water) to a medium with a lower refractive record (such as air), it can experience a wonder called total internal reflection. This happens when the point of frequency of the light at the boundary between the two media surpasses a critical point.

Within the given situation, if the angle of incidence  of the light at the water-air interface is 60 degrees, and the critical angle for water is 49 degrees, at that point the light will not undergo total inside reflection. Instep, it'll refract (twist) because it crosses the boundary and enters the air. The precise sum of refraction will depend on the point of frequency and the refractive lists of water and air.

Hence, since the angle of incidence(60 degrees) is more noteworthy than the  critical angle (49 degrees), the light will pass from water into air and proceed its way within the air medium, possibly refracting absent from the typical line (the line opposite to the surface of the water). It'll not be reflected back into the water due to internal reflection.

Learn more about reflection from

https://brainly.com/question/18772331

#SPJ1

The  magnitude of the angular acceleration of the wheel is 10.9 rad/s^2.

the wheel takes 2.02 seconds to come to stop from an initial angular velocity of 22.0 rad/s.

(a) We can use the formula for angular acceleration:

angular acceleration = (final angular velocity - initial angular velocity) / time taken

We are given the initial and final angular velocities, and the angle through which the wheel rotates. We need to find the time taken to slow down.

The circumference of the wheel is:

circumference = π × diameter = π × 0.345 m = 1.081 m

The distance traveled during the angular displacement of 13.8 rad is:

distance = 1.081 m × 13.8 = 14.92 m

The average angular velocity during the slowing down period is:

average angular velocity = (22.0 rad/s + 13.5 rad/s) / 2 = 17.75 rad/s

The time taken to slow down can be found using the formula:

time taken = angle of rotation / average angular velocity

time taken = 13.8 rad / 17.75 rad/s = 0.778 seconds

Therefore, the time taken to slow down is 0.778 seconds.

The angular acceleration can be found using the formula:

angular acceleration = (final angular velocity - initial angular velocity) / time taken

angular acceleration = (13.5 rad/s - 22.0 rad/s) / 0.778 s = -10.9 rad/s^2

Therefore, the magnitude of the angular acceleration of the wheel is 10.9 rad/s^2.

(b) To find the time taken to come to stop from an initial angular velocity of 22.0 rad/s, we can use the formula:

time taken = initial angular velocity / angular acceleration

time taken = 22.0 rad/s / 10.9 rad/s^2 = 2.02 seconds

Therefore, the wheel takes 2.02 seconds to come to stop from an initial angular velocity of 22.0 rad/s.

Visit to know more about Angular velocity:-

brainly.com/question/29342095
#SPJ11

Assuming the laser beam is perfectly vertically polarized, the polarizing filter will only allow light polarized in the same direction as its axis to pass through. Therefore, the laser beam's power will be reduced by a factor of $\cos^2 \theta$, where $\theta$ is the angle between the filter's axis and the vertical.

Given that the filter's axis is 34 degrees from horizontal, it is also 56 degrees from vertical. Thus, $\theta = 56^\circ$.

The power of the laser beam as it emerges from the filter is:

$P_{out} = P_{in} \cos^2 \theta$

where $P_{in}$ is the initial power of the laser beam.

Substituting the given values, we get:

$P_{out} = (210,\text{mW}) \cos^2 56^\circ \approx 86.5,\text{mW}$

Therefore, the power of the laser beam as it emerges from the filter is approximately 86.5 mW.

To know more about laser beam click this link -

brainly.com/question/4218151

#SPJ11

The total work done on sphere 3 during this process is equal to the work done by the external force that moves it to the right, which is given by w.

Since Spheres 1 and 2 are identical and equidistant from Sphere 3, they will exert equal and opposite forces on Sphere 3.

Therefore, the net force on sphere 3 due to spheres 1 and 2 is zero, and no work is done by their electric forces on sphere 3 during the process of moving it.

An external force refers to a force that acts on an object from outside the system being studied. It is a force that is not generated by the object itself, but rather comes from the environment or other objects in the system. External forces can cause changes in an object's motion, such as a change in velocity or direction. For example, when a ball is kicked, the force of the foot on the ball is an external force that causes the ball to move.

External forces can also be classified as contact or non-contact forces. Contact forces are those that require physical contact between two objects, such as friction or tension. Non-contact forces, on the other hand, act at a distance, such as gravitational or electromagnetic forces.

To learn more about External force visit here:

brainly.com/question/29130400

#SPJ4