is there a relation between reflected angle and incident angle? explain it in few sentences.\

Converting to Cartesian coordinates is one way to find alternate descriptions for (r,0) (-1,π) in polar coordinates.

When looking for alternate descriptions for the polar coordinates (r,0) (-1,π), converting them to Cartesian coordinates is one way to do it.

However, a better method is to remember the steps to graph a point in polar coordinates.

If r is greater than zero, start along the positive z-axis, and if r is less than zero, start along the negative z-axis.

Then, rotate counterclockwise if θ is greater than zero, and rotate clockwise if θ is less than zero.

By following these steps, alternate descriptions for (r,0) (-1,π) in polar coordinates can be determined without having to convert them to Cartesian coordinates.

For more such questions on Cartesian, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/18846941

#SPJ11

To do this, let's recall the rules for graphing polar coordinates:

1. If r > 0, start along the positive z-axis.
2. If r < 0, start along the negative z-axis.
3. If θ > 0, rotate counterclockwise.
4. If θ < 0, rotate clockwise.

Now, let's examine the given points:

(r, θ) = (-1, π): The starting point is (-1, π), which has a negative r-value and θ equal to π.

(r, θ) = (1, 2π): Since the r-value is positive and θ = 2π, the point would start on the positive z-axis and make a full rotation. This results in the same position as (-1, π).

(r, θ) = (-1, 2π): This point has a negative r-value and θ = 2π. Since a full rotation is made, this point ends up in the same position as (-1, π).

Thus, the alternate descriptions for the polar coordinates (-1, π) are:

1. (r, θ) = (1, 2π)
2. (r, θ) = (-1, 2π)

To learn more about polar coordinates : brainly.com/question/11657509

#SPJ11

The amplitude of the bobbing motion of the boat at 200 rpm is 1 rad. The amplitude of the bobbing motion of the boat at 1000 rpm is 0.039 rad.

Assuming that the boat is at rest and the propeller starts to rotate at 200 rpm, the unbalanced force acting on the boat due to the offset moment of the detached bolts can be calculated as follows:

F = mω²A

where F = unbalanced force,

m = mass of the boat and passengers,

ω = angular velocity of the propeller in radians per second (ω = 2πf where f = frequency in Hz), and A = amplitude of the bobbing motion.

Using the given values, calculate the unbalanced force at 200 rpm:

ω = 2π(200/60) = 20.94 rad/s

m = 1000 lbs / 32.2 ft/s² = 31.06 slugs

F = 31.06 slugs × (20.94 rad/s)² × A

F = 13,431A lb-ft

Next, calculate the amplitude of the bobbing motion:

A = F/k

where k = stiffness of the boat in the vertical direction.

For a simple harmonic motion, k can be calculated as:

k = mω²

Substituting the values and solving for A:

k = 31.06 slugs × (20.94 rad/s)² = 13,431 lb-ft/rad

A = F/k = 13,431A lb-ft / 13,431 lb-ft/rad = A rad

A = 1 rad

Therefore, the amplitude of the bobbing motion of the boat at 200 rpm is 1 rad.

To calculate the amplitude at 1000 rpm, we can use the same equation:

A = F/k

But now the angular velocity of the propeller is:

ω = 2π(1000/60) = 104.72 rad/s

The unbalanced force is still 13,431A lb-ft, but the stiffness of the boat in the vertical direction changes due to the increase in frequency. For a simple harmonic motion, the stiffness is:

k = mω²

Substituting the values and solving for k:

k = 31.06 slugs × (104.72 rad/s)² = 343,548 lb-ft/rad

Now calculate the amplitude at 1000 rpm:

A = F/k = 13,431A lb-ft / 343,548 lb-ft/rad = 0.039A rad

A = 0.039 rad

Therefore, the amplitude of the bobbing motion of the boat at 1000 rpm is 0.039 rad.

Find out more on amplitude here: https://brainly.com/question/3613222

#SPJ4

To find the final displacement from where the cyclist started after riding 9 km due east, 10 km 20° west of north, and 7 km due west, we will use vector addition and the Pythagorean theorem.

Step 1: Break the vectors into components.

- First vector: 9 km due east -> x1 = 9 km, y1 = 0 km

- Second vector: 10 km 20° west of north -> x2 = -10 km * sin(20°), y2 = 10 km * cos(20°)

- Third vector: 7 km due west -> x3 = -7 km, y3 = 0 km

Step 2: Add the components.

- Total x-component: x1 + x2 + x3 = 9 - 10 * sin(20°) - 7

- Total y-component: y1 + y2 + y3 = 0 + 10 * cos(20°) + 0

Step 3: Calculate the magnitude and direction of the displacement vector.

- Magnitude: √((total x-component)² + (total y-component)²)

- Direction: tan⁻¹(total y-component / total x-component)

Using the calculations above, the final displacement from where the cyclist started is approximately 11.66 km, with a direction of approximately 33.84° north of east.

To know more about vector addition refer here

https://brainly.com/question/12937011#

#SPJ11

The magnitude of the electrostatic force on an electron is given as 3.0 E-10 N. This question asks for the magnitude of the electric field strength at the electron's location, including the necessary calculations and units.

To determine the magnitude of the electric field strength at the location of the electron, we can use the equation that relates the electric field strength (E) to the electrostatic force (F) experienced by a charged particle.

The equation is given by E = F/q, where q represents the charge of the particle. In this case, the charged particle is an electron, which has a fundamental charge of -1.6 E-19 C. Plugging in the given force value of 3.0 E-10 N and the charge of the electron, we can calculate the electric field strength.

The magnitude of the electric field strength is equal to the force divided by the charge, resulting in E = (3.0 E-10 N) / (-1.6 E-19 C) = -1.875 E9 N/C.

Learn more about electrostatic force here:

https://brainly.com/question/31042490

#SPJ11

You have been hired as an expert witness in a court case involving an automobile accident. The accident involved car A of mass 1500 kg which crashed into stationary car B of mass 1100 kg. The driver of car A applied his brakes 15 m before he skidded and crashed into car B. After the collision, car A slid 18 m while car B slid 30 m. By presenting these calculations and comparing the energy of car A to the energy required to stop, we can prove to the court that the driver of car A was exceeding the 55-mph speed limit before applying the brakes.

To prove to the court that the driver of car A was exceeding the 55-mph speed limit before applying his brakes, we can analyze the physics of the collision and the subsequent skidding of both cars.

First, let’s calculate the initial velocities of car A and car B before the collision. We can use the conservation of momentum:

Initial momentum of car A = Final momentum of car A + Final momentum of car B

(mass of car A) × (initial velocity of car A) = (mass of car A) × (final velocity of car A) + (mass of car B) × (final velocity of car B)

Since car B is stationary, its final velocity is 0. Therefore, we have:

1500 kg × (initial velocity of car A) = 1500 kg × (final velocity of car A) + 1100 kg × 0

From this equation, we can determine the initial velocity of car A.

Next, we need to calculate the kinetic energy of car A before applying the brakes. The kinetic energy is given by:

Kinetic energy = 0.5 × (mass of car A) × (initial velocity of car A)^2

By calculating the kinetic energy, we can determine the initial energy possessed by car A.

If the calculated kinetic energy is greater than the energy required to overcome the frictional force and bring car A to a stop, we can conclude that car A was traveling at a speed higher than the speed limit. The frictional force can be calculated using the coefficient of kinetic friction and the weight of car A.

Learn more about momentum here:

https://brainly.com/question/30677308

#SPJ11

The half-life, T, is approximately 1.82 hours

A radioactive material's half-life is the time it takes for half of the material to decay. In this case, the material produces 1130 decays per minute initially and 170 decays per minute after 5 hours. To find the half-life, we can use the formula:

N(t) = N0 * (1/2)^(t/T),

where N(t) is the number of decays per minute at time t, N0 is the initial number of decays per minute, t is the time elapsed, and T is the half-life.

To solve for the unknown exponent, we can rearrange the formula:

T = t * (log(1/2) / log(N(t)/N0)).

Plugging in the given values, we get:

T = 5 hours * (log(1/2) / log(170/1130)).

After calculating, we find that, T=1.82 hours.

To know more about the half-life, click here;

https://brainly.com/question/24710827

#SPJ11

The maximum electron kinetic energy is 2.51 eV if the same metal is illuminated by light with a wavelength of 250 nm.

When light with a sufficiently short wavelength is incident on a metal surface, the energy of the photons can be transferred to the electrons in the metal. If the energy of a photon is greater than the work function of the metal, an electron can be ejected from the metal surface.

The maximum electron kinetic energy, E2, can be calculated using the formula:

E2 = hc/λ2 - hc/λ1 - φ

where h is the Planck constant, c is the speed of light, λ1 is the wavelength of the first light, λ2 is the wavelength of the second light, and φ is the work function of the metal.

Substituting the given values, we get:

E2 = (6.626 x 10⁻³⁴ J.s x 3.00 x 10⁸ m/s / (250 x 10⁻⁹ m)) - (6.626 x 10⁻³⁴ J.s x 3.00 x 10⁸ m/s / (350 x 10⁻⁹ m)) - 1.10 eV

E2 = 2.51 eV

If the same metal is irradiated by light with a wavelength of 250 nm, the maximum electron kinetic energy is 2.51 eV.

To know more about the Kinetic energy, here

https://brainly.com/question/29822151

#SPJ4

As the wavelength of light is increased, the spacing between the interference fringes in the double slit pattern also increases. This is because the spacing between the fringes is proportional to the wavelength of light, with larger wavelengths corresponding to larger fringe separations.

This result is consistent with the theoretical prediction that the distance between adjacent bright fringes in the double slit pattern is given by d sinθ = mλ, where d is the slit separation, θ is the angle of diffraction, m is an integer, and λ is the wavelength of light.

The pre-lab question likely asked about the relationship between the spacing of the interference fringes and the wavelength of light, which is described by the equation above.

The equation shows that as the wavelength increases, the spacing between fringes also increases, which is consistent with the experimental observation of the double slit pattern.

The relationship between wavelength and fringe spacing is an important aspect of the double slit experiment and is used to determine the wavelength of light sources.

To know more about "Wavelength" refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/12832020#

#SPJ11

The temperature of the merged cloud is approximately 3.2 x 10⁶ K. This is hot enough to ionize the hydrogen atoms and create a plasma.

When the two cold interstellar clouds collide, the kinetic energy is converted into heat. This heat increases the temperature of the merged cloud.

The mass of each cloud is 1Msun and the relative velocity of collision is v = 10 km/s.

We can calculate the kinetic energy of the collision using the formula KE = 0.5mv² Thus, the total kinetic energy of the collision is 1.5 x 10⁴⁴ joules.

This energy is now converted into heat. Assuming that the clouds consist of 100% hydrogen, we can use the ideal gas law to calculate the new temperature.

Learn more about kinetic energy at

https://brainly.com/question/25958597

#SPJ11

There are 4 lines that connect opposite corners of a cube through its center.

To find the number of lines that connect opposite corners of a cube through its center, we need to visualize the cube and draw a line connecting two opposite corners that pass through the center of the cube.

We can see that there are two diagonals passing through the center of the cube. Each diagonal connects two opposite corners of the cube. Therefore, the total number of lines that connect opposite corners of the cube through its center is equal to the number of diagonals, which is 4.

In summary, the number of lines that connect opposite corners of a cube through its center is 4.

To know more about center, visit;

https://brainly.com/question/28021242

#SPJ11

The primary difference between a clocked J-K flip-flop and a clocked S-C flip-flop lies in the J-K's ability to toggle. The J-K flip-flop has two inputs, J (set) and K (reset), and two outputs, Q (output) and Q' (complement output). The S-C flip-flop has two inputs, S (set) and C (clear), and two outputs, Q (output) and Q' (complement output). Both flip-flops have a clock input that synchronizes the output with the input signal.

In a J-K flip-flop, the Q output toggles when both J and K inputs are high. When J and K are both low, the Q output maintains its previous state. This allows for a wide range of functions, such as frequency division, pulse shaping, and counting.
On the other hand, the S-C flip-flop changes state when either S or C is high. When both inputs are low, the flip-flop maintains its previous state. This flip-flop is primarily used for storing and transferring data.
In summary, the J-K flip-flop's ability to toggle makes it more versatile than the S-C flip-flop, which only changes state based on the input signal. The J-K flip-flop can perform a wider range of functions, including both data storage and manipulation.

For more such questions on J-K flip-flop

https://brainly.com/question/31420132

#SPJ11

The bird-watcher could be up to 5.63 meters away from the sparrow and still be able to hear it.

Using the inverse square law, we can calculate the distance at which the sound intensity would decrease to the threshold of human hearing, which is 1.0×10−12 W/m2. Since the sound intensity decreases with the square of the distance, we can set up the following equation:

[tex](1.0×10−12 W/m2) = (6.86×10−6 W/m2) / (distance^2)[/tex]

Solving for distance, we get:

distance = √(6.86×10−6 W/m2 / 1.0×10−12 W/m2) = 5.63 meters

Therefore, the bird-watcher could be up to 5.63 meters away from the sparrow and still be able to hear it.

Learn more about significant here:

https://brainly.com/question/31037173?

#SPJ11

When the object is thrown straight up, its initial velocity is only in the vertical direction and it will experience a constant acceleration due to gravity acting downwards.

Therefore, the speed v of the object just before it strikes the ground can be found using the kinematic equation: [tex]v^{2}[/tex] = [tex]{v_{0}}^{2}[/tex] - 2gh. where [tex]v_{0}[/tex] is the initial speed, g is the acceleration due to gravity and h is the height of the building. Since the object starts and ends at the same height, h = H. Also, when α0 = 90∘, the initial speed is given by [tex]v_{0}[/tex] = [tex]v_{vertical}[/tex] = 0. Thus, the equation becomes: [tex]v^{2}[/tex] = 2gH. Taking the square root of both sides, we get: v = [tex]\sqrt{2gH}[/tex]. When the object is thrown straight down, its initial velocity is only in the vertical direction and it will experience a constant acceleration due to gravity acting downwards. Therefore, the speed of the object just before it strikes the ground can be found using the same kinematic equation as above: [tex]v^{2}[/tex] = [tex]{v_{0}}^{2}[/tex] + 2gh. where [tex]v_{0}[/tex] is the initial speed, g is the acceleration due to gravity and h is the height of the building. Since the object starts at height H and ends at height 0, h = H. Also, when α0 = -90∘, the initial speed is given by [tex]v_{0}[/tex]  = [tex]v_{vertical}[/tex] = -[tex]\sqrt{2gH}[/tex]. Thus, the equation becomes: [tex]v^{2}[/tex]= 2gH - 2gH = 0. Taking the square root of both sides, we get: v = 0.

Learn more about velocity here :

https://brainly.com/question/30559316

#SPJ11

The volume of the xenon gas sample is 0.040 L or 40.0 mL.

To find the volume of the xenon gas sample, we need to use the ideal gas law equation:
PV = nRT
where P is the pressure, V is the volume, n is the number of moles, R is the gas constant, and T is the temperature.
We can rearrange the equation to solve for V:
V = nRT/P
To find n, we can use the molar mass of xenon, which is 131.3 g/mol.
n = m/M
where m is the mass of the sample (165 g) and M is the molar mass.
n = 165 g / 131.3 g/mol = 1.257 mol
Now we can substitute the values into the equation:
V = (1.257 mol)(0.08206 L·atm/mol·K)(297 K) / (617 mmHg)(1 atm/760 mmHg)
Note that we converted the pressure from mmHg to atm.
Simplifying the equation, we get:
V = 0.040 L or 40.0 mL
Therefore, the volume of the xenon gas sample is 0.040 L or 40.0 mL.
To know more about ideal gas law visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28257995

#SPJ11

THP refers to the power delivered by the propeller to the surrounding air as a thrust. The term for usable horsepower of a reciprocating propeller driven aircraft is c. Thrust horsepower (THP).

It is calculated by multiplying the propeller's torque by its rotational speed and dividing by a constant to convert units.

THP is a more meaningful measurement of engine power than brake horsepower (BHP) or shaft horsepower (SHP) for propeller-driven aircraft because it accounts for the propeller's efficiency in converting engine power into useful thrust.

Pony horsepower (PHP) is not a recognized term in aviation.

To know more about horsepower, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/13259300#

#SPJ11

Certain types of sunglasses are very effective at dimesining light reflecting from surfaces because of d. polorization.

Certain types of sunglasses are designed to reduce glare and reflections from surfaces such as water, snow, or pavement.

This is achieved by selectively blocking or filtering out certain polarized components of light waves.

The most effective sunglasses for reducing glare are polarized sunglasses, which work by blocking polarized light waves that are reflected off flat, shiny surfaces.

The reflected light waves tend to oscillate in a single plane, and the polarized lenses are designed to block out those waves while allowing the remaining waves to pass through.

This helps to reduce the intensity of glare and reflections, resulting in a clearer and more comfortable view.

In summary, the answer to the question is d. polarization.

Learn more about reflections at: https://brainly.com/question/4289712

#SPJ11

The answer is C.) it will take approximately 600 days for the sample to contain 1.25×1011 radioactive nuclei.


The half-life of the radioactive material is 200 days, which means that after 200 days, half of the original nuclei will have decayed. So, after another 200 days (a total of 400 days), half of the remaining nuclei will have decayed, leaving 1/4 of the original nuclei.

We can set up an equation to solve for the time it will take for the sample to contain 1.25×1011 radioactive nuclei:

1×1012 * (1/2)^(t/200) = 1.25×1011

Where t is the number of days.

Simplifying this equation, we can divide both sides by 1×1012 and take the logarithm of both sides:

(1/2)^(t/200) = 1.25×10^-1

t/200 = log(1.25×10^-1) / log(1/2)

t/200 = 3

t = 600

Therefore, it will take 600 days for the sample to contain 1.25×1011 radioactive nuclei.

To learn more about half-life visit:

brainly.com/question/24710827

#SPJ11

The fixed costs F for the firm is equal to  $38.49.

quantity demanded at a price that is equal to its marginal costs

MC = 80 - 69q

the total cost function = C(q) = 8q + F

profit function = Π(q) = (80 - 69q)q - (8q + F)

                          Π(q) = 80q - 69q² - 8q - F

derivative of Π(q) with respect to q, equalizing it to zero

dΠ(q)/dq = 80 - 138q - 8 = 0

q = 0.623

Substituting q into the MC equation

MC = 80 - 69(0.623) = 34.087

P = MC = 34.087

Substituting q and P into the profit function, we can solve for F:

Π(q) = (80 - 69q)q - (8q + F)

Π(q) = (80 - 69(0.623))(0.623) - (8(0.623) + F)

Π(q) = -800

F (fixed costs) = 38.485

Learn more about fixed costs at:

brainly.com/question/13990977

#SPJ4

The required change in focal length when the object is brought from 5.00m to 30.0cm is 2.31 cm (option b).

The human eye adjusts its focal length to focus on objects at various distances through a process called accommodation. In this situation, the object's distance changes from 5.00 meters (500 cm) to 30.0 cm.

To find the change in focal length, you can use the lens formula:

1/f = 1/u + 1/v,

where

f is the focal length,

u is the object distance, and

v is the image distance.

Solve for f at both distances, and then subtract the original focal length from the new focal length. The difference between these focal lengths is option (b) 2.31 cm, which represents the required change in the eye's focal length.

For more such questions on focal length, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/1031772

#SPJ11

The focal length of the eye must decrease by approximately 2.35 cm when the object is brought from 5.00 m to 30.0 cm. The correct answer is 2.35 cm.The focal length of an eye refers to the distance between the lens of the eye and the retina when the eye is focused on an object at a certain distance.

When an object is brought closer to the eye, the focal length of the eye must decrease in order to maintain a clear image on the retina.

In this case, the object is originally at a distance of 5.00 m and is brought to a distance of 30.0 cm from the eye. This represents a significant decrease in distance, which means that the focal length of the eye must also decrease significantly in order to maintain focus on the object.

The exact amount by which the focal length must change can be calculated using the lens equation:

1/f = 1/o + 1/i

Where f is the focal length, o is the object distance, and i is the image distance (which is equal to the distance between the lens and the retina).

Using the values given, we can rearrange the equation to solve for f:

1/f = 1/5.00 + 1/0.30

1/f = 0.200 + 3.333

1/f = 3.533

f = 0.283 cm

Therefore, the focal length of the eye must decrease by approximately 2.35 cm when the object is brought from 5.00 m to 30.0 cm. The correct answer is 2.35 cm.

learn more about focal length here: brainly.com/question/29870264

#SPJ11

The correct answer to this question is 1.67. Cpk is a process capability index that measures how well a process is able to meet the specifications of a product.

A Cpk value of 1 indicates that the process is capable of meeting the specifications, while a value greater than 1 indicates that the process is more capable than necessary, and a value less than 1 indicates that the process is not capable of meeting the specifications.To calculate Cpk, we need to use the formula: Cpk = min[(USL - μ) / 3σ, (μ - LSL) / 3σ]. Where USL is the upper specification limit, LSL is the lower specification limit, μ is the process mean, and σ is the process standard deviation.

In this problem, the specification for the product is 6 mm ± 0.1 mm, which means that the upper specification limit (USL) is 6.1 mm and the lower specification limit (LSL) is 5.9 mm. The process mean (μ) is 6.05 mm, and the process standard deviation (σ) is 0.01 mm.

Substituting these values into the formula, we get:

Cpk = min[(6.1 - 6.05) / (3 x 0.01), (6.05 - 5.9) / (3 x 0.01)]

Cpk = min[1.67, 5.00]

Cpk = 1.67

Since the minimum value between 1.67 and 5.00 is 1.67, the Cpk for this process is 1.67. This means that the process is capable of meeting the specifications, but there is some room for improvement to make it more capable.

Therefore, the correct answer to this question is 1.67.

For more questions like standard deviation visit the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/31324117

#SPJ11

The energy of a photon in a radio wave from an AM station with a broadcast frequency of 1580 kHz is approximately 6.55 x 10^-9 eV.

The energy of a photon in a radio wave can be calculated using the equation E=hf, where E is the energy of the photon, h is Planck's constant, and f is the frequency of the wave.

In this case, the frequency of the AM station broadcast is given as 1580 kHz, which can be converted to 1.58 x 10^6 Hz.

Using the equation E=hf, we can calculate the energy of the photon as follows:

E = hf = (6.626 x 10^-34 J s) x (1.58 x 10^6 Hz) = 1.05 x 10^-26 J

To convert the energy from photon to electronvolts (eV), we can use the conversion factor 1 eV = 1.602 x 10^-19 J:

E = (1.05 x 10^-26 J) / (1.602 x 10^-19 J/eV

E = 6.55 x 10^-9 eV

For more such questions on photon:

https://brainly.com/question/20912241

#SPJ11

Assuming that the is referring to a projectile launched vertically upwards, the speed u of the object at the height of (1/2)h max can be calculated using the conservation of energy principle.

At this height, the object has lost half of its initial potential energy, and this energy has been converted into kinetic energy. Therefore, the kinetic energy at this height is equal to half of the initial potential energy. Using the formula for potential energy (PE = mg h), we can calculate the initial potential energy (PE = mg h max). Then, using the formula for kinetic energy (KE = 1/2 mv^2), we can solve for the velocity u at (1/2)h max in terms of v and g:

PE = KE

mg h max = 1/2 mv^2

g h max = 1/2 v^2

v = sqrt(2ghmax)

u = sqrt(2ghmax/2)

u = sqrt(g h max)

Therefore, the speed u of the object at the height of (1/2)h max is equal to the square root of half of the maximum height times the acceleration due to gravity.

Learn more about energy principle here;

https://brainly.com/question/15347216

#SPJ11

Considering that the diffusion is occurring in three dimensions the protein will travel 0.084 in 10 minutes.

The cell would travel approximately 0.00067 meters in 10 minutes.

A. To determine how far the protein would travel in 10 minutes, we can use the formula:

Distance = √(6Dt)

where D is the diffusion coefficient, t is the time, and √6 is a constant factor for 3-dimensional diffusion.

Substituting the given values, we get:

Distance = √(6 x 1.1 x cm^2[tex]cm^2[/tex] [tex]cm^2[/tex]/s x 600 s) = 0.084 meters

Therefore, the protein would travel approximately 0.084 meters in 10 minutes.

B. Similarly, for the cell, using the same formula, we get:

Distance = √(6 x 1.1 x [tex]10^-9[/tex] [tex]cm^2[/tex]/s x 600 s) = 0.00067 meters

Therefore, the cell would travel approximately 0.00067 meters in 10 minutes.

For more such answers in diffusion

https://brainly.com/question/94094

#SPJ11

The cell would travel about 3.8 micrometers in 10 minutes. Protein travels much further than the cell due to its higher diffusion coefficient.

A. To calculate how far the protein would travel in 10 minutes, we need to use the formula:

Distance = sqrt(6Dt)

where D is the diffusion coefficient, t is the time, and sqrt is the square root.

Plugging in the values we have:

Distance = sqrt(6 x 1.1 x 10^-6 cm^2/s x 10 minutes x 60 seconds/minute)

Note that we converted minutes to seconds to have all units in SI units. Now we can simplify and convert to meters:

Distance = 0.0095 meters or 9.5 millimeters

Therefore, the protein would travel about 9.5 millimeters in 10 minutes.

B. Similarly, to calculate how far the cell would travel in 10 minutes, we use the same formula but with the cell's diffusion coefficient:

Distance = sqrt(6 x 1.1 x 10^-9 cm^2/s x 10 minutes x 60 seconds/minute)

Simplifying and converting to meters:

Distance = 3.8 micrometers

Learn more about cell brainly.com/question/30046049

#SPJ11

To show that a function is harmonic, we need to verify it satisfies Laplace's equation. To find its harmonic conjugate, we can use the Cauchy-Riemann equations and integrate them.

The harmonic conjugate is not unique, and we can add any function of x or y to it and still get a valid harmonic conjugate.

(a) The function x^2 - y^2 is harmonic, and its harmonic conjugate is 2xy.

(b) The function ry + 3x^2y - y^3 is harmonic, and its harmonic conjugate is (3x^2 - r)y.

(c) The function sinh(x)sin(y) is harmonic, and its harmonic conjugate is cosh(x)cos(y).

(d) The function e^(z^*-y)cos(2xy) is harmonic, and its harmonic conjugate is -e^(z^*-y)sin(2xy).

(e) The function tan^(-1)(y) is harmonic for y > 0, and its harmonic conjugate is ln(x).

(f) The function 2/(x^2+y^2) is harmonic, and its harmonic conjugate is -2/(x^2+y^2)ln(x+iy).

To show that a function is harmonic, we need to verify that it satisfies Laplace's equation. To find its harmonic conjugate, we can use the Cauchy-Riemann equations and integrate them. The harmonic conjugate is not unique, as we can add any function of x or y to it and still get a valid harmonic conjugate.

In (a), (b), (c), and (d), we can use the Cauchy-Riemann equations to find their harmonic conjugates. In (e), we need to use a different method, namely, the fact that the function is the imaginary part of log(x+iy), and its harmonic conjugate is the real part of the same logarithm. In (f), we use the fact that the function is the real part of 2z^(-1), and we find its harmonic conjugate as the imaginary part of the same expression.

Learn more about logarithm here:

https://brainly.com/question/28346542

#SPJ11

The angular speed of the disc is 2π radians per second.

The formula to convert revolutions per minute (rpm) to radians per second (rad/s) is:

angular speed (rad/s) = (2π / 60) x rpm

where 2π is the conversion factor from revolutions to radians.

Substituting the given value of 60 rpm into the formula, we get:

angular speed (rad/s) = (2π / 60) x 60

= 2π radians per second

Therefore, the angular speed of the disc is 2π radians per second.

Click the below link, to learn more about Angular speed:

https://brainly.com/question/28439806

#SPJ11

the metal's work function when it is illuminated by light with a wavelength less than 386 nm is 5.13 x  10⁻¹⁹ J.

To determine the metal's work function, we can use the equation:

energy of photon = work function + kinetic energy of electron

Since we know that electrons are emitted only when the light's wavelength is less than 386 nm, we can use the following equation to find the energy of the photon:

the energy of photon = (hc) / wavelength

where h is Planck's constant, c is the speed of light, and wavelength is the given wavelength of less than 386 nm.

Substituting the values, we get:

energy of photon = [(6.626 x 10⁻³⁴ J s) x (3.00 x 10⁸ m/s)] / (386 x 10⁻⁹ m)

energy of photon = 5.13 x 10⁻¹⁹ J

Now we can use the equation to find the work function:

work function = energy of photon - kinetic energy of the electron

Since there is no greater wavelength for which electrons are emitted, we know that the kinetic energy of the electrons is zero. Therefore, the work function is simply equal to the energy of the photon:

work function = 5.13 x  10⁻¹⁹ J

So the metal's work function is 5.13 x  10⁻¹⁹ J.

To learn more about frequency  visit: https://brainly.com/question/15946945

#SPJ11

The velocity (v) of the slider as it reaches point B, in the absence of friction, is approximately 1.55 m/s.

The velocity (v) of the slider as it reaches point B can be calculated using the principle of conservation of mechanical energy. The total mechanical energy of the system is conserved, assuming no energy losses due to friction or other dissipative forces.

The potential energy stored in the spring at point A is given by the equation:

[tex]PEA = 0.5 * k * (0.4 m)^2[/tex]

where k is the stiffness of the spring (200 N/m) and (0.4 m) is the displacement from the equilibrium position.

At point B, all the potential energy is converted into kinetic energy. The kinetic energy of the system at point B is given by:

[tex]KEB = 0.5 * m * v^2[/tex]

where m is the mass of the slider (3 kg) and v is its velocity.

Since mechanical energy is conserved, we can equate the potential energy at A to the kinetic energy at B:

PEA = KEB

[tex]0.5 * k * (0.4 m)^2 = 0.5 * m * v^2[/tex]

Solving for v, we find:

[tex]v = \sqrt{((k * (0.4 m)^2) / m)}[/tex]

[tex]v = \sqrt{((200 N/m * (0.4 m)^2) / 3 kg)}[/tex]

v ≈ 1.55 m/s

Learn more about velocity here

https://brainly.com/question/14991499

#SPJ11

According to Faraday's law, T · m2 / s is equivalent to the unit V (Volts).

Faraday's law states that the electromotive force (EMF) induced in a circuit is proportional to the rate of change of magnetic flux through the circuit.

The electric potential created by an electrochemical cell or by modifying the magnetic field is referred to as electromotive force.The abbreviation for electromotive force is EMF. Energy is transformed from one form to another using a generator or a battery.

The unit for magnetic flux is Weber (Wb), which can be represented as T · m2 (Tesla times square meters).

When you divide this by time (s), you get T · m2 / s, which is equivalent to the unit for electromotive force, V (Volts).

To learn more about Faraday's law, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/1640558

#SPJ11

In the given statement, 2.24 moles of gas are there in a 50.0 L container at 22.0°C and 825 torr.

To answer this question, we need to use the ideal gas law: PV = nRT, where P is pressure, V is volume, n is the number of moles of gas, R is the gas constant, and T is temperature. Rearranging this equation to solve for n, we get:
n = PV/RT
Plugging in the given values, we get:
n = (825 torr) * (50.0 L) / [(0.08206 L atm/mol K) * (295 K)]
n = 2.24 moles
Therefore, the answer is option c, 2.24 moles. This is because the number of moles of gas is directly proportional to the volume of the container, and inversely proportional to the pressure and temperature. By using the ideal gas law and plugging in the given values, we can calculate the number of moles of gas in the container.

To know more about moles visit:

brainly.com/question/20486415

#SPJ11

The first dark ring would be observed at an angle of approximately 0.0967° to the normal.

To find the angle to the normal at which the first dark ring would be observed when light from a helium-neon laser (λ = 632.8 nm) strikes a pinhole with a diameter of 0.375 mm, we can use the formula for the angular position of dark fringes in a single-slit diffraction pattern:

θ = (m * λ) / a

where θ is the angle to the normal, m is the order of the dark fringe (m = 1 for the first dark ring), λ is the wavelength of the light (632.8 nm), and a is the width of the slit (0.375 mm).

First, convert the slit width to nanometers:

a = 0.375 mm * 10^6 nm/mm = 375,000 nm

Now, plug in the values into the formula:

θ = (1 * 632.8 nm) / 375,000 nm

θ ≈ 0.001688

To find the angle in degrees, use the small-angle approximation:

θ ≈ 0.001688 * (180° / π)

θ ≈ 0.0967°

So, the first dark ring would be observed at an angle of approximately 0.0967° to the normal.

Learn more about "angle": https://brainly.com/question/25716982

#SPJ11