In the figure, if the measure of 28 = 72°, what's the measure of 214?

Answer:

a) 0.69

The probability that a randomly selected 10-year old child will be more than 51.75 inches tall

P(X>51.75 ) = 0.6915

Step-by-step explanation:

Step(i):-

Given mean of the Population = 54.6 inches

Given standard deviation of the Population = 5.7 inches

Let 'X' be the random variable of normal distribution

Let 'X' = 51.75 inches

[tex]Z = \frac{x-mean}{S.D} = \frac{51.75-54.6}{5.7} = -0.5[/tex]

Step(ii):-

The probability that a randomly selected 10-year old child will be more than 51.75 inches tall

P(X>51.75 ) = P(Z>-0.5)

                  = 1 - P( Z < -0.5)

                 =   1 - (0.5 - A(-0.5))

                =    1 -0.5 + A(-0.5)

               =    0.5 + A(0.5)    (∵A(-0.5)= A(0.5)

              =     0.5 +0.1915

              =  0.6915

Conclusion:-

The probability that a randomly selected 10-year old child will be more than 51.75 inches tall

P(X>51.75 ) = 0.6915

Answer:

[tex]\boxed{\sf \ \ \ k = 1 \ \ \ }[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

hello,

saying that p-1 is a factor of [tex]p^4+p^2-p-k[/tex]

means that 1 is a root of this expression, so it comes

1+1-1-k=0

<=> 1-k=0

<=> k = 1

Answer:

[tex]t=\frac{595-600}{\frac{20}{\sqrt{65}}}=-2.016[/tex]    

The degrees of freedom are given by:

[tex]df=n-1=65-1=64[/tex]  

The p value would be given by:

[tex]p_v =2*P(t_{(64)}<-2.016)=0.048[/tex]  

And for this case since the p value is lower than the significance level we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true mena is different from 600 mg

Step-by-step explanation:

Information given

[tex]\bar X=595[/tex] represent the sample mean

[tex]s=20[/tex] represent the sample standard deviation

[tex]n=65[/tex] sample size  

[tex]\mu_o =600[/tex] represent the value to verify

[tex]\alpha=0.05[/tex] represent the significance level

t would represent the statistic

[tex]p_v[/tex] represent the p value

System of hypothesis

We want to test if the true mean is different from 600 mg, the system of hypothesis would be:  

Null hypothesis:[tex]\mu = 600[/tex]  

Alternative hypothesis:[tex]\mu \neq 600[/tex]  

The statistic would be given by:

[tex]t=\frac{\bar X-\mu_o}{\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]  (1)  

Replacing the info we got:

[tex]t=\frac{595-600}{\frac{20}{\sqrt{65}}}=-2.016[/tex]    

The degrees of freedom are given by:

[tex]df=n-1=65-1=64[/tex]  

The p value would be given by:

[tex]p_v =2*P(t_{(64)}<-2.016)=0.048[/tex]  

And for this case since the p value is lower than the significance level we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true mena is different from 600 mg

Answer:

P(G) = 0.55

the probability of getting an offspring pea that is green. Is 0.55.

Is the result reasonably close to the value of three fourths that was​ expected?

No

Expected P(G)= three fourths = 3/4 = 0.75

Estimated P(G) = 0.55

Estimated P(G) is not reasonably close to 0.75

Step-by-step explanation:

Given;

Number of green peas offspring

G = 450

Number of yellow peas offspring

Y = 371

Total number of peas offspring

T = 450+371 = 821

the probability of getting an offspring pea that is green is;

P(G) = Number of green peas offspring/Total number of peas offspring

P(G) = G/T

Substituting the values;

P(G) = 450/821

P(G) = 0.548112058465

P(G) = 0.55

the probability of getting an offspring pea that is green. Is 0.55.

Is the result reasonably close to the value of three fourths that was​ expected?

No

Expected P(G)= three fourths = 3/4 = 0.75

Estimated P(G) = 0.55

Estimated P(G) is not reasonably close to 0.75

Answer:

The like terms are: [tex]a^{2}b,\ ab,\ \teaxt{and}\ a[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

The expression is:

[tex]-a^{2}b+6ab-8+5a^{2}b-6a-b-a^{2}b-6a-a^{2}b+5a^{2}b+6ab+5a^{2}b+6ab-6a[/tex]

Collect the like terms as follows:

[tex]-a^{2}b+6ab-8+5a^{2}b-6a-b-a^{2}b-6a-a^{2}b+5a^{2}b+6ab+5a^{2}b+6ab-6a[/tex]

[tex]=(-a^{2}b+5a^{2}b-a^{2}b-a^{2}b+5a^{2}b+5a^{2}b)+(6ab+6ab+6ab)-(6a-6a-6a)-b-8[/tex]

[tex]=12a^{2}b+18ab+18a-b-8[/tex]

Thus, the final expression is [tex]12a^{2}b+18ab+18a-b-8[/tex]

The like terms are: [tex]a^{2}b,\ ab,\ \teaxt{and}\ a[/tex].

Answer:

The CORRECT answer is B

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Adding the two together 1212 + (99 - 1)

1310

1212/1310 = 606/655

Decimal: 0.9252

I'm always happy to help :)

Answer:

12/40=0.3

0.3 car parts per minute

9 / 0.3 = 30 minutes

30 minutes for 9 parts

Hope this helps

Step-by-step explanation:

Jose required 30 minutes to assemble 9 parts.

Jose assemble 12 car parts in 40 minutes. Time consumed by jose to assemble 9 parts to be calculated.

In mathematics it deals with numbers of operations according to the statements.

Here,
40 minute = 12 parts
40/12 = 1 part

Time to assemble 9 parts: = 40/12 x 9
                                             = 10/3 x 9
                                             =  30

Thus, Jose required 30 minutes to assemble 9 parts.

Learn more about arithmetic here:

brainly.com/question/14753192

#SPJ2

Answer:

9 canvases

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the number of canvases Rogelio can buy, we just need to divide the value of the gift card by the value of each canvas. Then, if the result is decimal, we round down, because if we round up we will not have enough money to buy them all.

So we have that:

Number of canvases = 100 / 10.99

Number of canvases = 9.099

Rounding down, we can buy 9 canvases

Answer:

  x = -5

Step-by-step explanation:

You are often told to start a problem like this by clearing fractions. Multiply the equation by the least common denominator of the fractions. Here, that value is 6.

  4x -3 = 2 +5x . . . . multiply the equation by 6

  -5 = x . . . . . . . . . . . add -2-4x to both sides

The solution is x = -5.

_____

If you're comfortable with arithmetic using fractions, you can "cut to the chase." Subtract 2/3x+1/3 from both sides:

  (2/3x -1/2) -(2/3x +1/3) = (1/3 +5/6x) -(2/3x +1/3)

  -1/2 -1/3 = 5/6x -2/3x . . . . simplify a little

  -5/6 = 1/6x . . . . . . . . . . . . .simplify more

  -5 = x . . . . . . multiply by 6

Answer:

see below

Step-by-step explanation:

x-5 > -2

Add 5 to each side

x-5+5 > -2+5

x > 3

open circle at 3 line going to the right

Answer:

x>3

Step-by-step explanation:

x-5>-2

x>3

Answer:

3^5

Step-by-step explanation:

becuase 3*3*3*3*3

Answer: 3^5 (3 to the power of 5)

Step-by-step explanation:

3 is multiplied by itself 5 times

To shorten the expression, exponential notation is used and it becomes 3^5, which essentially means three multiplied by itself 5 times

ex. 4^3 equals 4x4x4

Answer:

(a)f(4) square cm.

(b)f(10.91)-f(10.9) Square centimeter.

Step-by-step explanation:

f(r)=the area of a circle (in square cm) that has a radius of r cm.

(a)Area (in square cm) of a circle whose radius is 4 cm.

Since r=4cm

Area of the circle = f(4) square cm.

(b) When the radius of the increases from 10.9 to 10.91 cm.

Change in the Area = f(10.91)-f(10.9) Square centimeter.

Answer:

[tex]y = 5x-15[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Parallel ⇒ So the slopes will definitely be equal

So,

Slope = m = 5

Now,

Point = (x,y) = (4,5)

So, x = 4, y = 5

Putting these in the slope intercept form to get b

[tex]y = mx +b \\[/tex]

5 = (5)(4) + b

5 = 20 + b

b = -20+5

b = -15

So, Putting m and b in the slope intercept form to get the required equation,

[tex]y = 5x-15[/tex]

Answer:

B.

Step-by-step explanation:

The correct table that shows the justified solution steps is the second table.

The correct option is B.

The correct table that shows the justified solution steps is:

A 2-column table with 4 rows.

Column 1: Solution step

3x - 15 + 7x = 65

10x - 15 = 65

10x = 80

x = 8

Column 2: Method to Justify

Distributive property

Combine like terms

Addition property of equality

Division property of equality

In this table, the solution steps are correctly listed in the first column, showing the step-by-step process of solving the equation. The methods to justify each step are accurately provided in the second column, demonstrating the mathematical properties used at each stage.

To learn more about the equation;

https://brainly.com/question/12788590

#SPJ2

Answer:

4y = -3x +18

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's get the gradient from this line equation first.

4x-3y=10

4x-10=3y

Y= 4/3x -10/3

The gradient is 4/3.

For a line perpendicular to another line.

M*M'= -1

M= -/(4/3)

M = -3/4

So the gradient to be used is -3/4

Formula for solving is

(Y-y1)/(x-x1)= M

X1= 2

Y1= 3

M = -3/4

(Y-y1)/(x-x1)= M

(Y-3)/(x-2)= -3/4

4(y-3)= -3(x-2)

4y -12 = -3x +6

4y = -3x +18

Answer

value of x is 34 degrees  

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

[tex]\boxed{\sf \ \ \ age = 16 \ \ \ }[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Hello,

as the mean age of 5 people is 40

it means that the sum of the 5 ages is 40*5=200

now a person enters the room, let's note x his age

the new mean is

[tex]\dfrac{200+x}{6}=36[/tex]

[tex]<=>200+x=6*36=216\\<=> x = 216-200=16\\[/tex]

So the age of the new person is 16

hope this helps

Answer:

combine 4m -8m to get -4m

[tex] - 4m - 2[/tex]

Answer:

− 4m-2

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: 2x²-√3

Step-by-step explanation:

Another way to say the conjugate is the opposite. All you have to do is to change the sign in the binomial, which is 2x²+√3. When you change the sign, it becomes 2x²-√3.

Answer:

The Last One

Step-by-step explanation:

I used a special calculator plus, I did this already lol. Trust me <3

The required volume of the composite figure is 2260.80 cubic millimeters.

Volume is defined as the mass of the object per unit density while for geometry it is calculated as profile area multiplied by the length at which that profile is extruded.

here,
The volume of the composite figure is given as
Volume = Volume of cylinder + Volume of a sphere
             = πr²h + 4/3πr³
             = π [6²*12 + 4/3*6³ ]
             = 2260.80 cubic millimeters.

Thus, the required volume of the composite figure is 2260.80 cubic millimeters.

Learn more about Volume here:
https://brainly.com/question/1578538

#SPJ3

Answer:

[tex]t=\frac{2567-2564}{\frac{11}{\sqrt{21}}}=1.250[/tex]    

The degrees of freedom are given by:

[tex]df=n-1=21-1=20[/tex]  

the p value for this case would be given by:

[tex]p_v =2*P(t_{(20)}>1.250)=0.2113[/tex]  

For this case we see that the p value is higher than the significance level so then we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true mean is not significantly different from 2564 mm

Step-by-step explanation:

Information given

[tex]\bar X=2567[/tex] represent the mean height for the sample  

[tex]s=\sqrt{121}= 11[/tex] represent the sample standard deviation

[tex]n=21[/tex] sample size  

[tex]\mu_o =2564[/tex] represent the value that we want to test

[tex]\alpha=0.1[/tex] represent the significance level for the hypothesis test.  

t would represent the statistic

[tex]p_v[/tex] represent the p value

Hypothesis to test

We want to check if the true mean is equal to 2564 mm, the system of hypothesis would be:  

Null hypothesis:[tex]\mu = 2564[/tex]  

Alternative hypothesis:[tex]\mu \neq 2564[/tex]  

The statistic is given by:

[tex]t=\frac{\bar X-\mu_o}{\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]  (1)  

Replacing we got:

[tex]t=\frac{2567-2564}{\frac{11}{\sqrt{21}}}=1.250[/tex]    

The degrees of freedom are given by:

[tex]df=n-1=21-1=20[/tex]  

the p value for this case would be given by:

[tex]p_v =2*P(t_{(20)}>1.250)=0.2113[/tex]  

For this case we see that the p value is higher than the significance level so then we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true mean is not significantly different from 2564 mm

Answer:

Option (2)

Step-by-step explanation:

The given table represents the relation between the velocity and the time for an object is falling under the gravity.

Change in velocity with respect to time is directly proportional so the change is linear.

Acceleration due to gravity of this object is defined by the slope of the line joining the ordered pairs given in the table.

Let the two points lying on the line are (0, 0) and (1, 9.8)

Slope of the line passing through two points = [tex]\frac{(y_2-y_1)}{(x_2-x_1)}[/tex]

                                                                          = [tex]\frac{9.8-0}{1-0}[/tex]

                                                                          = 9.8 [tex]\frac{m}{s^{2} }[/tex]

Option (2) will be the answer.

Answer: 7000

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the amount invested in 8% account be P1 and the amount invested in 6% account be P2

. If the total amount invested is $20,000 then:

P1+P2=20,000. (Eq. 1)

The interest earned in one year from the 8% account is:

I1=0.08P1

and the interest earned in one year from the 6% account is:

I2=0.06P2

If the total interest earned is $1460, then:

I1+I2=1460

0.08P1+0.06P2=1460

(Eq. 2) From Eq. 1 :

P1=20000−P2

Substituting this into Eq. 2:

0.08 (20000−P2) + 0.06P2 = 1460

1600 − 0.08P2 + 0.06P2 = 1460

0.02P2 = 140

P2 = 140 / 0.02

P2 = 7000

Hence, he invested $7000 at the rate of 6%.

Answer:  see table below

Step-by-step explanation:

Simply add the digit on the left to the digit on the top

1, 2 --> 1 + 2 = 3

3, 4 --> 3 + 4 = 7

4, 2 --> 4 + 2 = 6

6, 6 --> 6 + 6 = 12

[tex]\begin{array}{c|c|c|c}&\underline{\quad 2\quad }&\underline{\quad 4\quad }&\underline{\quad 6\quad }\\\underline{\quad 1 \quad}&\bold{\underline{\quad 3\quad}}&\underline{\quad 5\quad}&\underline{\quad 7\quad}\\\underline{\quad 2 \quad}&\underline{\quad 4\quad }&\underline{\quad 6\quad }&\underline{\quad 8\quad}\\\underline{\quad 3 \quad}&\underline{\quad 5\quad }&\bold{\underline{\quad 7\quad}}&\underline{\quad 9\quad}\\\end{array}[/tex]

[tex]\begin{array}{c|c|c|c}{\underline{\quad 4 \quad}&\bold{\underline{\quad 6\quad }}&\underline{\quad 8\quad }&\underline{\quad 10\quad }\\\underline{\quad 5 \quad}&\underline{\quad 7\quad}&\underline{\quad 9\quad}&\underline{\quad 11\quad}\\\underline{\quad 6 \quad}&\underline{\quad 8\quad }&\underline{\quad 10\quad }&\bold{\underline{\quad 12\quad}}\\\end{array}[/tex]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the number of children's tickets sold =c

Let the number of adult's tickets sold =a

Let the number of student's tickets sold =s

A total of 204 tickets were sold, therefore: c+a+s=204

Child tickets are $6, adult tickets are $12, and student tickets are $8.

Total revenue =$2,008

Therefore:

6c+12a+8s-2008

We are also told that 4 more adult tickets were sold than the total number of student and child tickets combined.

c+s=a+4

We then solve the resulting system of equation.

Substituting c+s=a+4 into the first equation

c+a+s=204

a+4+a=204

2a=204-4

2a=200

a=100

Substitute a=100 into the second and third equation

6c+12(100)+8s=2008

6c+8s=2008-1200

6c+8s=808

From the third equation

c+s=100+4

c=104-s

Substitute c=104-s into 6c+8s=808

6(104-s)+8s=808

624-6s+8s=808

2s=808-624

2s=184

s=92

Since c=104-s

c=104-92

c=12

Therefore:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

We need to convert the radius and the height to cm first

1 cm = 0.393701 in

r (cm)= 3.7 in

[tex]h(cm)= \frac{3.7}{0.393701}= 9.398 cm[/tex]

1 cm = 0.393701 in

h (cm)= 5.6 in

[tex]h(cm)= \frac{5.6}{0.393701}= 14.22 cm[/tex]

The formula the volume of cylinder is

[tex]volume= \pi r^2h\\\\volume= 3.142*9.398^2*14.22\\volume=3946.17cm^3[/tex]

Answer:

[tex]n=3\sqrt{2}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]2n=1\times \left(3\sqrt{2}\right)\times \:2[/tex]

[tex]2n=2 \times 3\sqrt{2}[/tex]

[tex]2n=6\sqrt{2}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{2n}{2}=\frac{6\sqrt{2}}{2}[/tex]

[tex]n=3\sqrt{2}[/tex]

Answer:

n = 3√2

Step-by-step explanation:

=> [tex]1(3\sqrt{2} )2 = 2n\\6\sqrt{2} = 2n\\[/tex]

Dividing both sides by 2, we'll get

=> [tex]\frac{6\sqrt{2} }{2} = \frac{2n}{2}[/tex]

So,

=> n = [tex]3\sqrt{2}[/tex]

Answer:

It  was gained 4 1/4 points.

Step-by-step explanation:

- 7 1/8 - 1 5/8 + 13 = - 8 6/8 + 13 = - 8 3/4 + 13 = - 8 - 3/4 + 12 + 4/4 =  4 1/4