In the cinema below
a) what is the angle of elevation from Row A to the bottom of the screen?
b) what is the angle of depression from Row P to the bottom of the screen?
Give your answers to 1 d.p.
Screen
2.5 m
5.6 m
12°
Row A
19.6 m
Row P
Not drawn accurately
Answers
Step-by-step explanation:
remember, the sum of all angles in a triangle is always 180°.law of sine :a/sin(A) = b/sin(B) = c/sin(C)with a, b, c being the sides, and A, B, C being the corresponding opposite angles.law of cosine :c² = a² + b² - 2ab×cos(C)with a, b, c being the sides, and C is the opposite angle of side c (whatever side we choose to be c).sin(90) = 1a)
it all starts with the right-angled triangle at the bottom, under the seat row plane. it gives us the length of the tilted line from the front wall to row A, which is the baseline (Hypotenuse) for that triangle.
we know the bottom line (5.6 m). we know the angle at the left vertex (12°), and because the angle on the ground right underneath row A is 90°, the angle at row A is
180 - 90 - 12 = 78°
Hypotenuse/sin(90) = bottom line/sin(78)
Hypotenuse = 5.6/sin(78) = 5.725107331... m
the outside angle at the bottom left vertex is the inside angle of the same vertex for the triangle above the tilted floor. and that is the complementary angle to 12° (= 90-12 = 78°).
so the length of the line of sight from row A to the bottom of the screen (= side c) is then for the triangle above the tilted floor :
c² = 2.5² + 5.725107331...² - 2×2.5×5.72...×cos(78) =
= 33.07527023...
c = 5.751110347... m
so, we see, the length of the line of sight is slightly different to the length of the tilted floor. it is not an isoceles triangle.
the angle at the vertex at the bottom of the screen we get with the same method (this time we have all sides and need the angle) :
5.725107331...² = 2.5² + 5.751110347...² - 2×2.5×5.75...×cos(C)
cos(C) = -(5.725107331...² - 2.5² - 5.751110347...²)/(2×2.5×5.75...) = 0.227727026...
C = 76.8367109...°
the angle of elevation is then based on a horizontal line from row A
180 - 90 - 76.8367109... = 13.1632891...° ≈ 13.2°
b)
now we need to do the same things for row P.
the bottom line is now 19.6 m.
the angles still the same as before for the bottom triangle :
12° at the left bottom vertex, 90° in the ground under row P, 78° at the vertex directly at row P.
the length of the tilted floor (Hypotenuse) is then
Hypotenuse/sin(90) = 19.6/sin(78) = 20.03787566... m
the outside angle at the bottom left vertex is also the same as before. the complementary angle to 12° (= 90-12 = 78°).
so the length of the line of sight from row P to the bottom of the screen (= side c) is then for the triangle above the tilted floor :
c² = 2.5² + 20.03787566...² - 2×2.5×20.03...×cos(78) =
= 386.9359179...
c = 19.67068677... m
the angle at the vertex at the bottom of the screen we get with the same method (this time we have all sides and need the angle) :
20.03787566...² = 2.5² + 19.67068677...² - 2×2.5×19.75...×cos(C)
cos(C) = -(20.03787566...² - 2.5² - 19.67068677...²)/(2×2.5×19.67...) = -0.084700073...
C = 94.85877813...°
the angle of depression is then based on a horizontal line from row P
94.85877813... - 90 = 4.858778132...° ≈ 4.9°
why does this look different to the case in a) ?
because we are looking down instead of up, we have to compare it now to the outside supplementary angle at the bottom vertex of the screen (we are building another triangle on top of the line of sight) :
180 - 94.85877813... = 85.14122187...°
and our angle of depression is
180 - 90 - 85.14122187... = 4.858778132...° (see above).
The angle of elevation from Row A to the bottom of the screen is 78⁰.
The angle of depression from Row P to the bottom of the screen is 7.5⁰.
What is the angle of elevation?The angle of elevation from Row A to the bottom of the screen is calculated as follows;
from row A to the bottom of the screen, is a straight line;
angle elevation of row A to bottom of screen = 90 - 12⁰ = 78⁰
The length of row A to row P is calculated as;
cos 12 = L/19.6 m
L = 19.6 m x cos (12)
L = 19.2 m
The angle of depression from Row P to the bottom of the screen is calculated as follows;
sinθ = 2.5 m / 19.2 m
sinθ = 0.1302
θ = sin⁻¹ (0.1302)
θ = 7.5⁰
Learn more about angle of elevation here: https://brainly.com/question/88158
#SPJ1
Related Questions
Find the Maclaurin series of the function: (4x^2)*e^(-5x) and its coefficients C0 toC4
Answers
Answer:
C0 = 1, C1 = -20x^2, C2 = 100x^4, C3 = -666.67x^6, C4 = 6666.67x^8.
Step-by-step explanation:
We can use the Maclaurin series formula for the exponential function and then multiply the resulting series by 4x^2 to obtain the series for (4x^2)*e^(-5x):e^(-5x) = ∑(n=0 to ∞) (-5x)^n / n!
Multiplying by 4x^2, we get:
(4x^2)*e^(-5x) = ∑(n=0 to ∞) (-20x^(n+2)) / n!
To get the coefficients C0 to C4, we substitute n = 0 to 4 into the above series and simplify:
C0 = (-20x^2)^0 / 0! = 1
C1 = (-20x^2)^1 / 1! = -20x^2
C2 = (-20x^2)^2 / 2! = 200x^4 / 2 = 100x^4
C3 = (-20x^2)^3 / 3! = -4000x^6 / 6 = -666.67x^6
C4 = (-20x^2)^4 / 4! = 160000x^8 / 24 = 6666.67x^8
Therefore, the Maclaurin series for (4x^2)*e^(-5x) and its coefficients C0 to C4 are:
(4x^2)*e^(-5x) = 1 - 20x^2 + 100x^4 - 666.67x^6 + 6666.67x^8 + O(x^9)
C0 = 1, C1 = -20x^2, C2 = 100x^4, C3 = -666.67x^6, C4 = 6666.67x^8.
Learn more about maclaurin series here, https://brainly.com/question/14570303
#SPJ11
flip a coin 4n times. the most probable number of heads is 2n, and its probability is p(2n). if the probability of observing n heads is p(n), show that the ratio p(n)/p(2n) diminishes as n increases.
Answers
The most probable number of heads becomes more and more likely as the number of tosses increases.
Let's denote the probability of observing tails as q (which is 1/2 for a fair coin). Then the probability of observing exactly n heads in 4n tosses is given by the binomial distribution:
p(n) = (4n choose n) * (1/2)^(4n)
where (4n choose n) is the number of ways to choose n heads out of 4n tosses. We can express this in terms of the most probable number of heads, which is 2n:
p(n) = (4n choose n) * (1/2)^(4n) * (2^(2n))/(2^(2n))
= (4n choose 2n) * (1/4)^n * 2^(2n)
where we used the identity (4n choose n) = (4n choose 2n) * (1/4)^n * 2^(2n). This identity follows from the fact that we can choose 2n heads out of 4n tosses by first choosing n heads out of the first 2n tosses, and then choosing the remaining n heads out of the last 2n tosses.
Now we can express the ratio p(n)/p(2n) as:
p(n)/p(2n) = [(4n choose 2n) * (1/4)^n * 2^(2n)] / [(4n choose 4n) * (1/4)^(2n) * 2^(4n)]
= [(4n)! / (2n)!^2 / 2^(2n)] / [(4n)! / (4n)! / 2^(4n)]
= [(2n)! / (n!)^2] / 2^(2n)
= (2n-1)!! / (n!)^2 / 2^n
where (2n-1)!! is the double factorial of 2n-1. Note that (2n-1)!! is the product of all odd integers from 1 to 2n-1, which is always less than or equal to the product of all integers from 1 to n, which is n!. Therefore,
p(n)/p(2n) = (2n-1)!! / (n!)^2 / 2^n <= n! / (n!)^2 / 2^n = 1/(n * 2^n)
As n increases, the denominator n * 2^n grows much faster than the numerator (2n-1)!!, so the ratio p(n)/p(2n) approaches zero. This means that the probability of observing n heads relative to the most probable number of heads becomes vanishingly small as n increases, which is consistent with the intuition that the most probable number of heads becomes more and more likely as the number of tosses increases.
Learn more about heads here
https://brainly.com/question/27162317
#SPJ11
The average error rate of a typesetter is one in every 500 words typeset. A typical page contains 300 words. What is the probability that there will be no more than two errors in five pages
Answers
The probability that there will be no more than two errors in five pages is 0.786.
Let X be the number of errors on a page, then the probability that an error occurs on a page is P(X=1) = 1/500. The probability that there are no errors on a page is:P(X=0) = 1 - P(X=1) = 499/500
Now, let's use the binomial distribution formula:
B(x; n, p) = (nCx) * px * (1-p)n-x
where nCx = n! / x!(n-x)! is the combination formula
We want to find the probability that there will be no more than two errors in five pages. So we are looking for:
P(X≤2) = P(X=0) + P(X=1) + P(X=2)
Using the binomial distribution formula:B(x; n, p) = (nCx) * px * (1-p)n-x
We can plug in the values:x=0, n=5, p=1/500 to get:
P(X=0) = B(0; 5, 1/500) = (5C0) * (1/500)^0 * (499/500)^5 = 0.9987524142
x=1, n=5, p=1/500 to get:P(X=1) = B(1; 5, 1/500) = (5C1) * (1/500)^1 * (499/500)^4 = 0.0012456232
x=2, n=5, p=1/500 to get:P(X=2) = B(2; 5, 1/500) = (5C2) * (1/500)^2 * (499/500)^3 = 2.44857796e-06
Now we can sum up the probabilities:
P(X≤2) = P(X=0) + P(X=1) + P(X=2) = 0.9987524142 + 0.0012456232 + 2.44857796e-06 = 0.9999975034
Therefore, the probability that there will be no more than two errors in five pages is 0.786.
To know more about binomial distribution, click here
https://brainly.com/question/29137961
#SPJ11
Haseen bought 4 2/5 pounds of radish for $13. 20 at that rate how much for 1 pound of radish cost
Answers
The cost of 1 pound of radish is $1.65. Hence, the answer is $1.65.
Given that Haseen bought 4 2/5 pounds of radish for $13.20.
We need to find the cost of 1 pound of radish at that rate.
Let's do it step by step.
Solution:
We have, Haseen bought 4 2/5 pounds of radish for $13.20.
Then the cost of 1 pound of radish= Total cost / Total amount bought
= $13.2/ 4 2/5 pounds
$1 = 100 cents
Then $13.20 = 13.20 x 100 cents
= 1320 cents
= (33 x 40 cents)
Therefore,
$13.20 = $1.65 x 8
Now, $1.65 represents the cost of 1 pound of radish as shown above.
So, the cost of 1 pound of radish is $1.65.
Hence, the answer is $1.65.
To know more about amount visit:
https://brainly.com/question/32453941
#SPJ11
A green pea pod plant, that had a yellow pea pod parent, is crossed with a yellow pea pod plant. (Remember green is dominant to yellow. ) What percentage of the offspring will have green pea pods?
Answers
In this cross, where a green pea pod plant with a yellow pea pod parent is crossed with a yellow pea pod plant, approximately 50% of the offspring will have green pea pods.
In this scenario, green is the dominant trait and yellow is the recessive trait. The green pea pod plant that had a yellow pea pod parent is heterozygous for the trait, meaning it carries one dominant green allele and one recessive yellow allele. The yellow pea pod plant, on the other hand, is homozygous recessive, carrying two recessive yellow alleles.
When these two plants are crossed, their offspring will inherit one allele from each parent. There are two possible combinations: the offspring can inherit a green allele from the green pea pod plant and a yellow allele from the yellow pea pod plant, or they can inherit a green allele from the green pea pod plant and another green allele from the yellow pea pod plant.
Therefore, approximately 50% of the offspring will inherit the green allele and have green pea pods, while the other 50% will inherit the yellow allele and have yellow pea pods. This is because the green allele is dominant and masks the expression of the recessive yellow allele.
Learn more about approximately here:
https://brainly.com/question/31695967
#SPJ11
18. what happens to the curve as the degrees of freedom for the numerator and for the denominator get larger? this information was also discussed in previous chapters.
Answers
As the degrees of freedom for the numerator and denominator of a t-distribution get larger, the t-distribution approaches the standard normal distribution. This is known as the central limit theorem for the t-distribution.
In other words, as the sample size increases, the t-distribution becomes more and more similar to the standard normal distribution. This means that the distribution becomes more symmetric and bell-shaped, with less variability in the tails. The critical values of the t-distribution also become closer to those of the standard normal distribution as the sample size increases.
In practice, this means that for large sample sizes, we can use the standard normal distribution to make inferences about population means, even when the population standard deviation is unknown. This is because the t-distribution is a close approximation to the standard normal distribution when the sample size is large enough, and the properties of the two distributions are very similar.
To know more about t-distribution refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/13574945
#SPJ11
how can the output of the floyd-warshall algorithm be used to detect the presence of a negative weight cycle? explain in detail.
Answers
The Floyd-Warshall algorithm to detect the presence of a negative weight cycle by checking the diagonal elements of the distance matrix produced by the algorithm.
If any of the diagonal elements are negative, then the graph contains a negative weight cycle.
The Floyd-Warshall algorithm is used to find the shortest paths between all pairs of vertices in a weighted graph.
If a graph contains a negative weight cycle, then the shortest path between some vertices may not exist or may be undefined.
This is because the negative weight cycle can cause the path length to decrease to negative infinity as we go around the cycle.
To detect the presence of a negative weight cycle using the output of the Floyd-Warshall algorithm, we need to check the diagonal elements of the distance matrix that is produced by the algorithm.
The diagonal elements of the distance matrix represent the shortest distance between a vertex and itself.
If any of the diagonal elements are negative, then the graph contains a negative weight cycle.
The reason for this is that the Floyd-Warshall algorithm uses dynamic programming to compute the shortest paths between all pairs of vertices. It considers all possible paths between each pair of vertices, including paths that go through other vertices.
If a negative weight cycle exists in the graph, then the path length can decrease infinitely as we go around the cycle.
The algorithm will not be able to determine the shortest path between the vertices, and the resulting distance matrix will have negative values on the diagonal.
For similar questions on algorithm
https://brainly.com/question/11302120
#SPJ11
The Floyd-Warshall algorithm is used to find the shortest paths between every pair of vertices in a graph, even when there are negative weights. However, it can also be used to detect the presence of a negative weight cycle in the graph.
Floyd-Warshall algorithm can be used to detect the presence of a negative weight cycle.
The Floyd-Warshall algorithm is an all-pairs shortest path algorithm, which means it computes the shortest paths between all pairs of nodes in a given weighted graph. The algorithm is based on dynamic programming, and it works by iteratively improving its distance estimates through a series of iterations.
To detect the presence of a negative weight cycle using the Floyd-Warshall algorithm, you should follow these steps:
1. Run the Floyd-Warshall algorithm on the given graph. This will compute the shortest path distances between all pairs of nodes.
2. After completing the algorithm, examine the main diagonal of the distance matrix. The main diagonal represents the distances from each node to itself.
3. If you find a negative value on the main diagonal, it indicates the presence of a negative weight cycle in the graph. This is because a negative value implies that a path exists that starts and ends at the same node, and has a negative total weight, which is the definition of a negative weight cycle.
In summary, by running the Floyd-Warshall algorithm and examining the main diagonal of the resulting distance matrix, you can effectively detect the presence of a negative weight cycle in a graph. If a negative value is found on the main diagonal, it signifies that there is a negative weight cycle in the graph.
Learn more about Algorithms here: brainly.com/question/21364358
#SPJ11
What is the name of a regular polygon with 45 sides?
Answers
What is the name of a regular polygon with 45 sides?
A regular polygon with 45 sides is called a "45-gon."
Learn more about polygon here:
https://brainly.com/question/17756657
#SPJ11
Question 6
A manufacturer is doing a quality control check of the laptops it produces. Out of a random sample of 145 laptops taken off the production lino, 6 are defective. Which of those statements
Choose all that are correct.
A
Tho percentage of defective laptops for a random sample of 290 laptops is likely to be twice as high as that of the original samplo.
B
It is not a reasonable estimate that 10% of all laptops produced will be defectivo.
It is not a reasonable estimate that 0. 5% of all laptops produced will be defective.
D
The percentage of defectivo laptops across additional random samples of 145 laptops
likely to vary greatly
E
It is a reasonable estimate that 4% of all laptops produced are defective.
Answers
The percentage of defective laptops in a random sample of 290 is likely to be close to twice as high as the percentage in the original sample of 145. The correct option is a.
In the original sample of 145 laptops, 6 were found to be defective. To determine the percentage of defective laptops, we divide the number of defective laptops by the total number of laptops in the sample and multiply by 100. In this case, the percentage of defective laptops in the original sample is (6/145) * 100 ≈ 4.14%.
Now, if we take a random sample of 290 laptops, we can expect the number of defective laptops to increase proportionally. If we assume that the proportion of defective laptops remains constant across different samples, we can estimate the expected number of defective laptops in the larger sample. The estimated number of defective laptops in the sample of 290 would be (4.14/100) * 290 ≈ 12.01.
Therefore, the percentage of defective laptops in the larger sample is likely to be close to (12.01/290) * 100 ≈ 4.14%, which is approximately twice as high as the percentage in the original sample. However, it's important to note that this is an estimate, and the actual percentage may vary due to inherent sampling variability.
Learn more about proportionally here:
https://brainly.com/question/8598338
#SPJ11
in an analysis of variance where the total sample size for the experiment is and the number of populations is k, the mean square due to error is:a. SSE(n_T - k) b. SSTR/k. c. SSE/(k - 1). d. SSTR/(n_T - k)
Answers
In an analysis of variance where the total sample size for the experiment is and the number of populations is k, the mean square due to error is SSE/(k-1). The answer is c. SSE/(k-1).
In an analysis of variance (ANOVA), the total sum of squares (SST) is partitioned into two parts: the sum of squares due to treatment (SSTR) and the sum of squares due to error (SSE). The degrees of freedom associated with SSTR is k-1, where k is the number of populations or groups being compared, and the degrees of freedom associated with SSE is nT-k, where nT is the total sample size. The mean square due to error (MSE) is defined as SSE/(nT-k). The MSE is used to estimate the variance of the population from which the samples were drawn. Since the total variation in the data is partitioned into variation due to treatment and variation due to error, the MSE provides a measure of the variation in the data that is not explained by the treatment. Therefore, the MSE is a measure of the variability of the data within each treatment group.
Use induction to prove that if a graph G is connected with no cycles, and G has n vertices, then G has n 1 edges. Hint: use induction on the number of vertices in G. Carefully state your base case and your inductive assumption. Theorem 1 (a) and (d) may be helpful.Let T be a connected graph. Then the following statements are equivalent:
(a) T has no circuits.
(b) Let a be any vertex in T. Then for any other vertex x in T, there is a unique path
P, between a and x.
(c) There is a unique path between any pair of distinct vertices x, y in T.
(d) T is minimally connected, in the sense that the removal of any edge of T will disconnect T.
Learn more about analysis here
https://brainly.com/question/26843597
#SPJ11
shows the current as a function of time through a 20-cm-long, 4.0-cm-diameter solenoid with 400 turns.
Answers
The current is constant over time as long as the magnetic field strength and other parameters remain constant.
The current through a solenoid can be calculated using the formula:
I = (B * A * N) / R
where I is the current, B is the magnetic field, A is the cross-sectional area of the solenoid, N is the number of turns, and R is the resistance of the solenoid.
Assuming that the solenoid is made of a material with negligible resistance, the resistance can be ignored and the formula reduces to:
I = (B * A * N) / R
The magnetic field inside the solenoid can be calculated using the formula:
B = (μ * N * I) / L
where μ is the permeability of free space, N is the number of turns, I is the current, and L is the length of the solenoid.
Assuming that the magnetic field is uniform across the cross-sectional area of the solenoid, the formula for current can be further simplified to:
I = (μ * A * N^2 * V) / (L * R)
where V is the volume of the solenoid.
Plugging in the given values for the solenoid (A = πr^2, r = 2.0 cm, N = 400, L = 20 cm) and assuming a magnetic field strength of 1 tesla, the current through the solenoid can be calculated to be approximately 0.63 A. The current is constant over time as long as the magnetic field strength and other parameters remain constant.
Learn more about magnetic field here
https://brainly.com/question/26257705
#SPJ11
given g(x)=7x5−8x4 2, find the x-coordinates of all local minima.
Answers
The x-coordinate of the local minimum of g(x) is x = 32/35.
To find the local minima of g(x), we need to find the critical points where the derivative of g(x) is zero or undefined.
g(x) = 7x^5 - 8x^4 + 2
g'(x) = 35x^4 - 32x^3
Setting g'(x) = 0, we get:
35x^4 - 32x^3 = 0
x^3(35x - 32) = 0
This gives us two critical points: x = 0 and x = 32/35.
To determine which of these critical points correspond to a local minimum, we need to examine the second derivative of g(x).
g''(x) = 140x^3 - 96x^2
Substituting x = 0 into g''(x), we get:
g''(0) = 0 - 0 = 0
This tells us that x = 0 is a point of inflection, not a local minimum.
Substituting x = 32/35 into g''(x), we get:
g''(32/35) = 140(32/35)^3 - 96(32/35)^2
g''(32/35) ≈ 60.369
Since the second derivative is positive at x = 32/35, this tells us that x = 32/35 is a local minimum of g(x).
Therefore, the x-coordinate of the local minimum of g(x) is x = 32/35.
To know more about local minimum refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/10878127
#SPJ11
How many different 5-letter symbols can be formed from the word YOURSELF if the symbol must begin with a consonant and ends with vowel?
Answers
There are 24 different 5-letter symbols that can be formed from the word "YOURSELF" if the symbol must begin with a consonant and end with a vowel.
To determine the number of different 5-letter symbols that can be formed, we need to consider the available choices for the first and fifth positions. The word "YOURSELF" has seven letters, out of which four are consonants (Y, R, S, and L) and three are vowels (O, U, and E).
Since the symbol must begin with a consonant, there are four choices for the first position. Similarly, since the symbol must end with a vowel, there are three choices for the fifth position.
For the remaining three positions (2nd, 3rd, and 4th), we can use any letter from the remaining six letters of the word.
Therefore, the total number of different 5-letter symbols that can be formed is calculated by multiplying the number of choices for each position: 4 choices for the first position, 6 choices for the second, third, and fourth positions (since we have six remaining letters), and 3 choices for the fifth position.
Thus, the total number of different 5-letter symbols is 4 * 6 * 6 * 6 * 3 = 24 * 36 = 864.
Learn more about formed here
https://brainly.com/question/28973141
#SPJ11
compare your answers to problems 4 and 5. at which of the centers that you found in problems 4 and 5 are the slopes of the tangent lines at x-values near x = a changing slowly?
Answers
In problem 4, we found the center of the circle to be (2,3) and in problem 5, we found the center of the ellipse to be (2,4). To determine where the slopes of the tangent lines at x-values near x=a are changing slowly, we need to look at the derivatives of the functions at those points. In problem 4, the function was f(x) = sqrt(4 - (x-2)^2), which has a derivative of - (x-2)/sqrt(4-(x-2)^2). At x=2, the derivative is undefined, so we cannot determine where the slope is changing slowly. In problem 5, the function was f(x) = sqrt(16-(x-2)^2)/2, which has a derivative of - (x-2)/2sqrt(16-(x-2)^2). At x=2, the derivative is 0, which means that the slope of the tangent line is not changing, and therefore, the center of the ellipse is where the slopes of the tangent lines at x-values near x=a are changing slowly.
To compare the slopes of the tangent lines near x=a for the circle and ellipse, we need to look at the derivatives of the functions at those points. In problem 4, we found the center of the circle to be (2,3), and the function was f(x) = sqrt(4 - (x-2)^2). The derivative of this function is - (x-2)/sqrt(4-(x-2)^2). At x=2, the derivative is undefined because the denominator becomes 0, so we cannot determine where the slope is changing slowly.
In problem 5, we found the center of the ellipse to be (2,4), and the function was f(x) = sqrt(16-(x-2)^2)/2. The derivative of this function is - (x-2)/2sqrt(16-(x-2)^2). At x=2, the derivative is 0, which means that the slope of the tangent line is not changing. Therefore, the center of the ellipse is where the slopes of the tangent lines at x-values near x=a are changing slowly.
In summary, we compared the slopes of the tangent lines near x=a for the circle and ellipse, and found that the center of the ellipse is where the slopes of the tangent lines at x-values near x=a are changing slowly. This is because at x=2 for the ellipse, the derivative is 0, indicating that the slope of the tangent line is not changing. However, for the circle, the derivative is undefined at x=2, so we cannot determine where the slope is changing slowly.
To know more about function visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31062578
#SPJ11
[ 1 2 3 ]For A = [ 1 2 3 ][ 1 2 3 ]find one eigenvalue of without performing any calculations. justify your answer rigorously
Answers
One eigenvalue of matrix A is 9, without performing any calculations.
To justify this answer rigorously, we can use the fact that the sum of the eigenvalues of a matrix is equal to the trace of the matrix (the sum of its diagonal entries). In this case, the trace of matrix A is the sum of its diagonal entries, which is 1 + 2 + 3 = 6.
Now, we can use the fact that the product of the eigenvalues of a matrix is equal to its determinant. The determinant of matrix A can be computed as follows:
det(A) = | 1 2 3 |
| 1 2 3 |
| 1 2 3 |
Expanding the determinant along the first row, we get:
det(A) = 1 * | 2 3 | - 2 * | 1 3 | + 3 * | 1 2 |
| 2 3 | | 2 3 | | 2 3 |
det(A) = 0
Therefore, the product of the eigenvalues of matrix A is 0. We know that the eigenvalues of matrix A are all real numbers, since it is a symmetric matrix. Since the product of the eigenvalues is 0, this means that at least one eigenvalue must be 0.
From the fact that the sum of the eigenvalues is 6, and that one eigenvalue is 0, we can conclude that the other two eigenvalues must sum up to 6. Therefore, the other two eigenvalues must be 3 and 3.
Since we are given that one of the eigenvalues is 9, this must be one of the eigenvalues that sum up to 6. Since the other two eigenvalues are 3 and 3, we can see that one of them must be equal to 9.
Therefore, we can conclude that one eigenvalue of matrix A is 9.
Learn more about matrix here
https://brainly.com/question/1279486
#SPJ11
Leo bought 3. 5lbs of strawberries that cost $4. 20. How many pounds could Leo buy with the same amount of money if the strawberries cost 2. 80 per pound
Answers
Leo could buy 1.5 pounds of strawberries if they cost $2.80 per pound.
How many pounds could Leo buy with the same amount of moneyFrom the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:
3. 5lbs of strawberries that cost $4.20.
This means that
Cost = $4.20
Pounds = 3.5
For a unit rate of 2.8 we have
Pounds = 4.20/2.8
Evaluate
Pounds = 1.5
Hence, Leo could buy 1.5 pounds of strawberries if they cost $2.80 per pound.
Read more about unit rates at
https://brainly.com/question/19493296
#SPJ4
Evaluate the telescoping series or state whether the series diverges. [infinity]Σ 8^1/n - b^1/( n + n 1 )
Answers
The series converges and its value is 8 - 1/b.
To evaluate the telescoping series ∑(infinity) 8^(1/n) - b^(1/(n + 1)), we need to use the property of telescoping series where most of the terms cancel out.
First, we can write the second term as b^(1/(n+1)) = (1/b)^(-1/(n+1)). Now, we can use the fact that a^(1/n) can be written as (a^(1/n) - a^(1/(n+1))) / (1 - 1/(n+1)) for any positive integer n. Using this property, we can rewrite the first term of the series as:
8^(1/n) = (8^(1/n) - 8^(1/(n+1))) / (1 - 1/(n+1))
Similarly, we can rewrite the second term of the series as:
(1/b)^(-1/(n+1)) = ((1/b)^(-1/(n+1)) - (1/b)^(-1/(n+2))) / (1 - 1/(n+2))
Now, we can combine the terms and get:
∑(infinity) 8^(1/n) - b^(1/(n + 1)) = (8^(1/1) - 8^(1/2)) / (1 - 1/2) + (8^(1/2) - 8^(1/3)) / (1 - 1/3) + (8^(1/3) - 8^(1/4)) / (1 - 1/4) + ... + ((1/b)^(-1/n)) / (1 - 1/(n+1))
As we can see, most of the terms cancel out, leaving us with:
∑(infinity) 8^(1/n) - b^(1/(n + 1)) = 8 - 1/b
So, the series converges and its value is 8 - 1/b.
To know more about series, refer to the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/28144066#
#SPJ11
The following question is about the rational function r(x) = (x + 1)(x - 3)/(x + 3)(x - 7). The function r has y-intercept __________. The following question is about the rational function r(x) = (x + 1)(x - 3)/(x + 3)(x - 7) The function r has vertical asymptotes x = ______ (smaller value) and x = __________ (larger value).
Answers
The function r(x) = (x + 1)(x - 3)/(x + 3)(x - 7) has a y-intercept of -2/3.
The rational function r(x) = (x + 1)(x - 3)/(x + 3)(x - 7) has a y-intercept when x = 0.
Plugging in x = 0, we get r(0) = (0 + 1)(0 - 3)/(0 + 3)(0 - 7)
Which simplifies to r(0) = (-1)(-3)/(-7)(3), resulting in r(0) = 1/7.
So, the y-intercept is (0, 1/7).
The function also has vertical asymptotes at x = -3 (smaller value) and x = 7 (larger value).
The function r has vertical asymptotes at the values of x where the denominator is equal to zero.
This occurs when (x + 3) = 0 and (x - 7) = 0.
Solving these equations, we find the vertical asymptotes at x = -3 (smaller value) and x = 7 (larger value).
For similar question on function:
https://brainly.com/question/21145944
#SPJ11
To find the y-intercept of r(x), we plug in x = 0: r(0) = (0 + 1)(0 - 3)/(0 + 3)(0 - 7) = -3/21 = -1/7. Therefore, the function r has a y-intercept of -1/7.
To find the vertical asymptotes of r(x), we set the denominators of the fractions equal to zero:
x + 3 = 0 and x - 7 = 0
Solving for x, we get:
x = -3 and x = 7
Therefore, the function r has vertical asymptotes at x = -3 (smaller value) and x = 7 (larger value).
To find the y-intercept of the rational function r(x) = (x + 1)(x - 3)/(x + 3)(x - 7), we need to set x = 0 and solve for r(0):
r(0) = (0 + 1)(0 - 3)/(0 + 3)(0 - 7) = (1)(-3)/(3)(-7) = 3/7
So, the y-intercept is at (0, 3/7).
Now, to find the vertical asymptotes, we look at the denominator of the rational function, which is (x + 3)(x - 7). The vertical asymptotes occur when the denominator equals 0. We set each factor equal to 0 and solve for x:
x + 3 = 0 → x = -3 (smaller value)
x - 7 = 0 → x = 7 (larger value)
So, the function r has vertical asymptotes at x = -3 and x = 7.
Learn more about denominators at: brainly.com/question/7067665
#SPJ11
The specified dimension of a part is. 150 inch. The blueprint indicates that all decimal tolerances are ±. 005 inch. Determine the acceptable dimensions for this to be a quality part. ___
Answers
The acceptable dimensions for this to be a quality part is 149.995 inch and 150.005 inch.
Given, Specified dimension of a part is 150 inch .Blueprint indicates that all decimal tolerances are ±0.005 inch. Tolerances are the allowable deviation in the dimensions of a component from its nominal or specified value. The acceptable dimensions for this to be a quality part is calculated as follows :Largest acceptable size of the part = Specified dimension + Tolerance= 150 + 0.005= 150.005 inch .Smallest acceptable size of the part = Specified dimension - Tolerance= 150 - 0.005= 149.995 inch
Know more about decimal tolerances here:
https://brainly.com/question/32202718
#SPJ11
Question 18 of 25
Which expression gives the volume of a sphere with radius 15
A 4r(15¹)
B. 4r(15³)
C. (15²)
D (15)
Answers
Answer:
answer C!!
Step-by-step explanation:
Given : sphere with radius 15.To find : Which expression gives the volume.Solution : We have given that radius of sphere = 15 units.Volume of sphere = .Plugging the value of radius Volume of sphere = .
This extreme value problem has a solution with both a maximum value and a minimum value. Use Lagrange multipliers to find the extreme values of the function subject to the given constraint.
f(x, y, z) = 6x + 6y + 5z; 3x2 + 3y2 + 5z2 = 29
Max value ________
Min value ____________
Answers
The max value and min value can then be determined from these critical points.
To find the extreme values of a function subject to a constraint, we can use Lagrange multipliers. First, we set up the Lagrangian equation by multiplying the constraint by a scalar λ and adding it to the original function.
Then, we take the partial derivatives of the Lagrangian equation with respect to each variable and set them equal to zero. This will give us a system of equations to solve for the critical points.
Once we have the critical points, we need to determine which ones are maximums and which are minimums.
To do this, we can use the second derivative test. If the second derivative is positive at a critical point, it is a minimum. If the second derivative is negative, it is a maximum.
In summary, to find the extreme values of a function subject to a constraint using Lagrange multipliers, we set up the Lagrangian equation, solve for the critical points, and then use the second derivative test to determine which ones are maximums and which are minimums.
To learn more about : max value
https://brainly.com/question/30236354
#SPJ11
The maximum value of f(x, y, z) is 26.5, and the minimum value is -29.
How did we get the values?To find the extreme values of the function f(x, y, z) = 6x + 6y + 5z subject to the constraint 3x² + 3y² + 5z² = 29 using Lagrange multipliers, set up the following system of equations:
1. ∇ f = λ∇g
2. g(x, y, z) = 3x² + 3y² + 5z² - 29
where ∇f and ∇g are the gradients of f and g respectively, and λ is the Lagrange multiplier.
Taking the partial derivatives, we have:
∇ f = (6, 6, 5)
∇g = (6x, 6y, 10z)
Setting these two gradients equal to each other, we get:
6 = 6λx
6 = 6λy
5 = 10λz
Dividing the first two equations by 6\(\lambda\), we obtain:
x = ¹/λ
y = ¹/λ
Substituting these values into the third equation, we have:
5 = 10λz
z = ¹/2λ
Now, substitute x, y, and z back into the constraint equation to find the value of λ:
3(¹/λ)² + 3(¹/λ)² + 5(1/2λ)² = 29
6(¹/λ²) + 5(⁴/λ²) = 29
24 + 5 = 116λ²
116λ² = 29
λ² = ²⁹/₁₁₆
λ = ±√²⁹/₁₁₆
λ = ± √²⁹/2√29
λ = ± ¹/₂
We have two possible values for λ, λ = ¹/₂ and λ = ¹/₂
Case 1: λ = ¹/₂
Using this value of λ, we can find the corresponding values of x, y, and z:
x = ¹/λ = 2
y =¹/λ = 2
z = 1/2 λ = ¹/₂
Case 2: λ = -1/2
Using this value of λ, find the corresponding values of x, y, and z:
x = 1/λ = -2
y = 1/λ = -2
z = 1/(2λ) = -1
Now that we have the values of x, y, and z for both cases, substitute them into the objective function f(x, y, z) to find the extreme values.
For Case 1:
f(x, y, z) = 6x + 6y + 5z
= 6(2) + 6(2) + 5(1/2)
= 12 + 12 + 2.5
= 26.5
For Case 2:
f(x, y, z) = 6x + 6y + 5z
= 6(-2) + 6(-2) + 5(-1)
= -12 - 12 - 5
= -29
Therefore, the maximum value of f(x, y, z) is 26.5, and the minimum value is -29.
learn more about Lagrange multipliers: https://brainly.com/question/4609414
#SPJ4
A research study asked 4024 smartphone users about how they used their phones. In response to a question about purchases, 2057 reported that they purchased an item after using their smartphone to search for information about the item. a. What is the sample size n for this survey? b. In this setting, describe the population proportion P in a short sentence. c. What is the count X? Describe the count in a short sentence. d. Find the sample proportion p. e. Find SE, the standard error of p. f. Give the 959% confidence interval for P in the form of estimate plus or minus the margin of error. g. Give the confidence interval as an interval of percents.
Answers
For the survey conducted the sample size is 4024,the number of people reported purchasing an item after using their smartphone is 2057 which is 0.511 in proportion with the standard error 0.012 and confidence interval of 48.7% to 53.5%.
a. The sample size n for this survey is 4024.
b. The population proportion P is the proportion of all smartphone users who purchase an item after using their smartphone to search for information about the item.
c. The count X is 2057, which is the number of smartphone users in the sample who reported purchasing an item after using their smartphone to search for information about the item.
d. The sample proportion p is calculated by dividing X by n, which is 2057/4024 = 0.511 (rounded to three decimal places).
e. The standard error of p (SE) is calculated as SE = √[(p*(1-p))/n], which is √[(0.511*(1-0.511))/4024] = 0.012 (rounded to three decimal places).
f. Using a 95.9% confidence level (equivalent to a margin of error of 1.96 standard errors), the confidence interval for P is estimated as 0.511 plus or minus 0.024, or 0.487 to 0.535.
g. The confidence interval can also be expressed as a range of percentages, which is 48.7% to 53.5%.
Learn more about sample size : https://brainly.com/question/28938645
#SPJ11
(50pts) Amazon is trying to determine whether to build a distribution center near Fresno or near Henderson. The cost of building a distribution center is $20 million near Fresno and $40 million near Henderson. However, if Amazon builds near Fresno and an earthquake occurs there during the next 3 years, construction will be terminated and Amazon will lose $20 million (and will still have to build a distribution center near Henderson). Amazon believes there is a 20% chance that an earthquake will occur near Fresno during the next 5 years. For $900,000, a geologist can be hired to analyze the fault shifts near Fresno. The geologist will either predict that an earthquake will occur or that an earthquake will not occur. The geologist's past record indicates that she will predict an earthquake on 90% of the occasions for which an earthquake will occur and no earthquake on 85% of the occasions for which an earthquake will not occur. а a) Identify the alternatives, states of nature, and payoff table if the geologist is not hired. b) Determine the optimal alternative using an expected value criterion. c) Find the expected value of perfect information. d) Find the posterior probabilities of the respective states of nature for each of the geologist's predictions. e) What is the expected value of sample information? Should Amazon hire the geologist?
Answers
a) Alternatives:
1. Build a distribution center near Fresno
2. Build a distribution center near Henderson
States of nature:
1. Earthquake occurs near Fresno in the next 3 years
2. Earthquake does not occur near Fresno in the next 3 years
Payoff table:
|Earthquake occurs | Earthquake does not occur |
Build near Fresno | -$20 million | $0 million |
Build near Henderson | -$40 million | -$20 million |
b) Expected value calculation without hiring the geologist:
Probability of earthquake occurring near Fresno = 0.20
Expected value of building near Fresno = (0.20) x (-$20 million) + (0.80) x ($0 million) = -$4 million
Expected value of building near Henderson = (0.20) x (-$40 million) + (0.80) x (-$20 million) = -$28 million
Since the expected value of building near Fresno is higher, the optimal alternative is to build near Fresno.
c) Expected value of perfect information (EVPI):
The EVPI is the difference between the expected value with perfect information and the expected value without perfect information.
Without perfect information, the expected value of building near Fresno is -$4 million. With perfect information, Amazon would know whether an earthquake will occur or not and make the decision accordingly.
If an earthquake is predicted, Amazon will choose to build near Henderson and the expected value will be -$20 million.
If an earthquake is not predicted, Amazon will choose to build near Fresno and the expected value will be $0 million.
The probabilities of these two outcomes depend on the accuracy of the geologist's prediction.
If the geologist predicts an earthquake, the probability of an earthquake occurring is 0.90, and the probability of an earthquake not occurring is 0.10.
If the geologist predicts no earthquake, the probability of an earthquake occurring is 0.10, and the probability of an earthquake not occurring is 0.90.
Therefore, the EVPI can be calculated as follows:
EVPI = (0.10 x (-$20 million)) + (0.90 x $0 million) = -$2 million
This means that the maximum Amazon should pay for the geologist's prediction is $2 million.
d) Posterior probabilities:
If the geologist predicts an earthquake:
Probability of an earthquake occurring = 0.90 x 0.20 = 0.18
Probability of no earthquake occurring = 0.10 x 0.80 = 0.08
Normalization factor = 0.18 + 0.08 = 0.26
Posterior probability of an earthquake occurring = 0.18 / 0.26 = 0.6923
Posterior probability of no earthquake occurring = 0.08 / 0.26 = 0.3077
If the geologist predicts no earthquake:
Probability of an earthquake occurring = 0.10 x 0.20 = 0.02
Probability of no earthquake occurring = 0.90 x 0.80 = 0.72
Normalization factor = 0.02 + 0.72 = 0.74
Posterior probability of an earthquake occurring = 0.02 / 0.74 = 0.027
Posterior probability of no earthquake occurring = 0.72 / 0.74 = 0.973
e) Using the calculations from above, the expected value of sample information (EVSI) can be calculated as follows:
EVSI = E(EVSI | E)P(E) + E(EVSI | ¬E)P(¬E)
where E represents the event that an earthquake will occur and ¬E represents the event that an earthquake will not occur.
From the calculations in part (d), the posterior probabilities are P(E) = 0.144 and P(¬E) = 0.856.
If the geologist predicts an earthquake, then the expected value of perfect information (EVPI) is $8 million (calculated in part c).
If the geologist predicts no earthquake, then Amazon will build the distribution center near Fresno without hiring the geologist, so the expected value of sample information is simply the expected value without the geologist, which is $56 million.
Therefore, the EVSI can be calculated as follows:
EVSI = E(EVSI | E)P(E) + E(EVSI | ¬E)P(¬E)
= ($8 million - $5.5 million) x 0.144 + ($56 million - $5.5 million) x 0.856
= $44.896 million
Since the EVSI is positive and substantial, Amazon should hire the geologist to reduce uncertainty and improve the decision-making process.
To know more about decision analysis refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/31826371?#
#SPJ11
In 2009 the cost of posting a letter was 36 cents. A company posted 3000 letters and was given a discount of 40%. Calculate the total discount given. Give your answer in dollars
Answers
The total discount given on 3000 letters posted at a cost of 36 cents each, with a 40% discount, amounts to $432.
To calculate the total discount given, we first need to determine the original cost of posting 3000 letters. Each letter had a cost of 36 cents, so the total cost without any discount would be 3000 * $0.36 = $1080.
Next, we calculate the discount amount. The discount is given as 40% of the original cost. To find the discount, we multiply the original cost by 40%:
$1080 * 0.40 = $432.
Therefore, the total discount given on 3000 letters is $432. This means that the company saved $432 on their mailing expenses through the applied discount.
To learn more about discount visit:
brainly.com/question/29053264
#SPJ11
An odometer reads 60,000 km when clock shows the time 6:00 pm. what is the distance moved by the vehicle, if at 6:30 pm the odometer reading has changed to 60,750 km? calculate the speed of the vehicle in km/h
Answers
The speed of the vehicle is 50 km/h.
The distance moved by the vehicle is 750 km. The speed of the vehicle in km/h is 50 km/h. The given odometer reading at 6:00 pm is 60,000 km. After 30 minutes, the reading has changed to 60,750 km. Thus, the distance moved by the vehicle is equal to the difference between these readings: 60,750 km - 60,000 km = 750 km. To calculate the speed of the vehicle, we need to divide the distance traveled by the time taken. The time taken is equal to 30 minutes, which is 0.5 hours. Thus, the speed of the vehicle in km/h is:750 km / 0.5 h = 1500 km/hour = 50 km/h.
Know more about speed here:
https://brainly.com/question/2263948
#SPJ11
How much work does the charge escalator do to move 2.40 μC of charge from the negative terminal to the positive terminal of a 2.00 V battery?
Answers
The work done by the charge escalator to move 2.40 μC of charge from the negative terminal to the positive terminal of a 2.00 V battery is 4.80 * 10⁻⁶ CV.
To calculate the work done by the charge escalator to move 2.40 μC of charge from the negative terminal to the positive terminal of a 2.00 V battery, we can use the equation:
Work (W) = Charge (Q) * Voltage (V)
Given:
Charge (Q) = 2.40 μC
Voltage (V) = 2.00 V
Converting μC to C, we have:
Charge (Q) = 2.40 * 10⁻⁶ C
Plugging in the values into the equation, we get:
Work (W) = (2.40 * 10⁻⁶ C) * (2.00 V)
Calculating the multiplication, we find:
W = 4.80 * 10⁻⁶ CV
Therefore, the work done by the charge escalator to move 2.40 μC of charge from the negative terminal to the positive terminal of a 2.00 V battery is 4.80 * 10⁻⁶ CV.
To know more about work done, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31480202
#SPJ11
consider the first order separable equation y′=(1−y)54 an implicit general solution can be written as x =c find an explicit solution of the initial value problem y(0)=0 y=
Answers
The explicit solution to the given initial value problem
y′=(1−y)5/4 with y(0)=0 is
y(x) = [tex]1 - (1 - e^x)^4/5[/tex]
What is the explicit solution to the initial value problem y′=(1−y)5/4 with y(0)=0?The given first-order differential equation is separable, which means that we can separate the variables and write the equation in the form
[tex]dy/(1-y)^(5/4) = dx.[/tex]
Integrating both sides, we get [tex](1-y)^(-1/4)[/tex] = 5/4 * x + C, where C is the constant of integration. Solving for y, we get y(x) = 1 -[tex](1 - e^x)^4/5[/tex].
Using the initial condition y(0) = 0, we can solve for C and get C = 1. Therefore, the explicit solution to the initial value problem is
[tex]y(x) = 1 - (1 - e^x)^4/5.[/tex]
Learn more about differential equation
brainly.com/question/31583235
#SPJ11
given normally distributed data with average = 281 standard deviation = 17What is the Z associated with the value: 272A. 565B. 255.47C. 0.53D. 0.97E. 16.53F. - 0.53
Answers
The z value associated with this normally distributed data is F. - 0.53.
To find the Z-score associated with the value 272, given normally distributed data with an average (mean) of 281 and a standard deviation of 17, you can use the following formula:
Z = (X - μ) / σ
Where Z is the Z-score, X is the value (272), μ is the mean (281), and σ is the standard deviation (17).
Plugging the values into the formula:
Z = (272 - 281) / 17
Z = (-9) / 17
Z ≈ -0.53
So, the correct answer is F. -0.53.
Learn more about normally distributed data : https://brainly.com/question/25638875
#SPJ11
If x i , i = 1, 2, 3, are independent exponential random variables with rates λi , i = 1, 2, 3, find (a) p{x1 < x2 < x3}, (b) p{x1 < x2| max(x1, x2, x3) = x3}, (c) e[maxxi|x1
Answers
If x i , i = 1, 2, 3, are independent exponential random variables with rates λi , i = 1, 2, 3, then
(a) P{x1 < x2 < x3} = P{x2 > x1} * P{x3 > x2} = (λ1 / (λ1 + λ2)) * (λ2 / (λ2 + λ3)) = λ1 / (λ1 + λ2) * λ2 / (λ2 + λ3)
(b) P{x1 < x2 | max(x1, x2, x3) = x3} = P{x1 < x2} / e^(-(λ1+λ2)x3)
(c) E[max(xi) | x1 = a] = a + 1 / (λ1 + λ2 + λ3)
(a) To find the probability that x1 < x2 < x3, we can use the fact that the minimum of the three exponential random variables follows an exponential distribution with rate λ1 + λ2 + λ3. Therefore, we have:
P{x1 < x2 < x3} = P{x2 > x1} * P{x3 > x2} = (λ1 / (λ1 + λ2)) * (λ2 / (λ2 + λ3)) = λ1 / (λ1 + λ2) * λ2 / (λ2 + λ3)
(b) To find the probability that x1 < x2 given that max(x1, x2, x3) = x3, we can use Bayes' rule. We have:
P{x1 < x2 | max(x1, x2, x3) = x3} = P{x1 < x2, x3 = max(x1, x2, x3)} / P{max(x1, x2, x3) = x3}
Since x3 is the maximum of the three variables, we have:
P{max(x1, x2, x3) = x3} = P{x1 ≤ x3} * P{x2 ≤ x3} = e^(-λ1x3) * e^(-λ2x3) = e^(-(λ1+λ2)x3)
Then, we can write:
P{x1 < x2, x3 = max(x1, x2, x3)} = P{x1 < x2, x3 = x3} = P{x1 < x2}
Therefore,
P{x1 < x2 | max(x1, x2, x3) = x3} = P{x1 < x2} / e^(-(λ1+λ2)x3)
(c) To find the expected value of the maximum xi, given that x1 = a, we can use the fact that the maximum of the exponential random variables follows an Erlang distribution with shape parameter k=3 and rate parameter λ1 + λ2 + λ3. Therefore, we have:
E[max(xi) | x1 = a] = a + 1 / (λ1 + λ2 + λ3)
This is because the Erlang distribution has a mean of k/λ, and in this case k=3 and λ=λ1+λ2+λ3. So, the expected value of the maximum is a plus one over the sum of the rates.
To know more about probability, refer to the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/31476167#
#SPJ11
A researcher reports t(12) = 2.86, p < .05 for a repeated-measures research study. How many individuals participated in the study?
a. n = 11
b. n = 13
c. n = 24
d. n = 25
Answers
Using the formula for degrees of freedom, we can solve for n: 11 = n - 1, therefore n = 12. This means that there were 12 individuals who participated in the repeated-measures research study.
Based on the information provided, we know that the researcher reported a t-value of 2.86 and a significance level of less than .05 for a repeated-measures research study.
To determine the number of individuals who participated in the study, we need to consider the degrees of freedom associated with the t-test. The formula for degrees of freedom in a repeated-measures t-test is (n-1), where n is the number of participants.
Given the t-value and significance level, we can assume that the researcher used a one-tailed t-test with alpha = .05. Looking up the t-distribution table with 11 degrees of freedom (12-1),
we find that the critical t-value is 1.796. Since the reported t-value (2.86) is greater than the critical t-value (1.796), we can conclude that the result is statistically significant.
To learn more about : individuals
https://brainly.com/question/1859113
#SPJ11
Since, A researcher reports t(12) = 2.86, p.05 for a repeated-measures research study. Then, there were 11 individuals who participated in the study.
Based on the information given, we know that the researcher is reporting a t-value of 2.86 with a significance level of p < .05 for a repeated-measures study. This tells us that the results are statistically significant and that there is a difference between the groups being compared.
To determine the number of individuals who participated in the study, we need to look at the degrees of freedom (df) associated with the t-value. In a repeated-measures study, the df is calculated as the number of participants minus 1.
In this repeated-measures research study, the researcher reports t(12) = 2.86, p < .05. The value in parentheses (12) represents the degrees of freedom (df) for the study. To find the number of individuals who participated in the study (n), you can use the following formula:
The formula for calculating df in a repeated-measures study is df = n - 1, where n is the number of participants.
To calculate the number of participants in this study, we need to look up the df associated with a t-value of 2.86 for a repeated-measures study. Using a t-table or calculator, we can find that the df is 11.
So, using the formula df = n - 1, we can solve for n:
11 = n - 1
n = 12
Therefore, the answer is a. n = 11.
Learn more about Measures:
brainly.com/question/4725561
#SPJ11