From 1914 to 1917, America did not remain neutral in "thought and deed." The US government showed signs of partiality in several ways despite President Woodrow Wilson's call for neutrality.
However, Americans were divided about the prospect of the country joining the war, with some urging that they stay neutral while others saw this as an opportunity for America to show its might. The following are some of the ways in which the US did not remain neutral in "thought and deed":
- Wilson's economic policies were not neutral: Wilson's neutrality policies were at odds with his economic policies. Although the government adhered to strict neutrality regulations, businesses were encouraged to provide goods to both the Central Powers and the Allies. The United States did not strictly comply with the principles of neutrality since both the Allies and the Central Powers bought American weapons, ammunition, and supplies.
- Loaning to the allies: In order to provide economic support to the Allies, the US lent them money. In addition, the US government provided Britain and France with critical supplies, such as weapons, ammunition, and food. American banks, such as JP Morgan, played a critical role in funding the Allies' efforts.
Overall, despite President Woodrow Wilson's call for neutrality, the United States did not remain neutral in "thought and deed" from 1914 to 1917.
To know more about neutrality visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29567624
#SPJ11
Why did the protestant reformation begin in germany? what political factors contributed to its success there as opposed to france, spain, or italy?
The Protestant Reformation refers to the series of religious, political, intellectual, and cultural changes that took place in Europe during the 16th century.
The Reformation began as an attempt by some European intellectuals to reform the Catholic Church. The movement took place in several European countries, but it started in Germany. The reasons why the Protestant Reformation began in Germany are many. Firstly, Germany had experienced the greatest revival of learning in Europe during the late Middle Ages.
Secondly, the country was a center of commerce and industry. Germany's central location and its growing importance as a commercial and manufacturing center made it an attractive target for the Reformation. Thirdly, the German people had long been dissatisfied with the Catholic Church. They were unhappy with the corruption of the clergy and the moral laxity of the Church.
These factors contributed to the success of the Reformation in Germany as opposed to France, Spain, or Italy. Germany was a political patchwork at that time, composed of over 300 principalities, each with its own ruler and political organization. This political fragmentation made it difficult for the Holy Roman Emperor, Charles V, to suppress the Reformation.
To know more about organization visit:
https://brainly.com/question/12825206
#SPJ11
Please Help ASAP
Describe the causes of the Bronze Age Collapse and its impact on
the many civilizations of the eastern Mediterranean in 250-300
words.
Volcanic eruptions, droughts, plague, earthquakes, and invasions are some of the factors that contributed to the Bronze Age Collapse and its effects on the numerous civilizations in the eastern Mediterranean.
The decline and collapse of significant Mediterranean civilizations during the 13th and 12th centuries BCE are referred to as the Bronze Age Collapse (also known as the Late Bronze Age Collapse). Beginning in the third millennium B.C., the Bronze Age saw significant developments made around the world. Soon, stronger and more resilient versions of the primitive tools and weapons emerged. Due to improved farming and hunting techniques, there was a rise in the population as a result of the transformation.
Read more about eastern Mediterranean at
https://brainly.com/question/1769307
#SPJ4
What changed in the late twentieth century that allowed anthropologist to continue research even after leaving the field?
In the late twentieth century, advancements in technology, specifically in the field of communication and data storage, revolutionized the way anthropologists could continue their research even after leaving the field.
The emergence and widespread adoption of digital technologies played a significant role in enabling remote research activities. Anthropologists could now collect and analyze data using digital devices such as cameras, audio recorders, and video recorders, which made it easier to document and preserve their fieldwork.Additionally, the advent of the internet and digital communication platforms allowed anthropologists to maintain contact with informants and colleagues, exchange information, and collaborate remotely.
Email, online forums, and social media platforms became valuable tools for ongoing communication and data sharing. Moreover, advancements in data storage and analysis technologies, such as digitized archives and computer software, facilitated the organization, preservation, and analysis of large amounts of anthropological data. Researchers could now access and analyze their data remotely, allowing for continued research and analysis even outside the physical field site.
To know more about research refer here
brainly.com/question/30276641
#SPJ11
How did Moses know what to write? (Read II Peter 1:21) What part might oral tradition have played?
According to II Peter 1:21, it is mentioned that "prophecy never had its origin in the human will, but prophets, though human, spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit." This verse suggests that Moses, as a prophet, was inspired by God and guided by the Holy Spirit in what he wrote. Therefore, Moses knew what to write through divine inspiration.
Oral tradition likely played a significant role in preserving and passing down the stories, teachings, and laws that Moses eventually recorded in written form. Before the development of writing systems, ancient cultures heavily relied on oral transmission of information. Stories, genealogies, religious teachings, and cultural practices were passed down orally from one generation to another. These oral traditions served as a means of preserving historical accounts and religious beliefs.
In the case of Moses, who lived during a time when writing systems were not as widespread, oral tradition would have been the primary mode of transmitting knowledge and narratives. The stories of creation, the patriarchs, and the Israelites' journey from Egypt to the Promised Land were likely passed down orally through generations before Moses recorded them in written form.
Oral tradition would have allowed for flexibility and adaptability in retelling the stories, ensuring their preservation and relevance over time. It would have also allowed for cultural context, interpretations, and additional details to be incorporated into the narratives. While oral tradition may have influenced the way the stories were transmitted, the divine inspiration received by Moses guided him in accurately recording the essential aspects of God's teachings and commands.
Overall, the combination of divine inspiration and the oral tradition of storytelling played vital roles in Moses' knowledge of what to write and in the preservation of the sacred texts that form a significant part of religious scripture.
for more questions on Moses
https://brainly.com/question/14213744
#SPJ8
Who was Virgil? Who was Homer? What exactly is The Aeneid? What is The Odyssey? How are the two works similar? How do they differ? What do these works reveal about the cultures in which they were created?
The epic poem The Aeneid was written by Roman poet Virgil. The epic poem The Odyssey is credited to Homer, an ancient Greek poet. The poem has been translated into numerous languages and is regarded as one of the greatest pieces of Latin literature. Odysseus, a Greek hero who fought in the Trojan War, is the subject of the epic poem The Odyssey. On his return journey, Odysseus encounters numerous challenges. In that they are both epic poems about heroes on journeys, the two works are similar. The Odyssey is about a hero from Greece, whereas The Aeneid is about a Trojan hero who becomes the Romans' ancestor. The cultures in which these works were created reveal a lot. For instance, The Odyssey reflects antiquated Greek qualities like cordiality, dependability, and clever. In the meantime, Roman ideals like piety, duty, and honor are reflected in The Aeneid.
Aeneas, a Trojan who escaped the collapse of Troy and made his way to Italy, where he eventually became the progenitor of the Romans, is the subject of the epic poem in Latin known as The Aeneid. The Aeneid is a 9,896-line poem in dactylic hexameter that was written by the Roman poet Virgil between 29 and 19 BC.
The first six of the poem's twelve books describe Aeneas' wanderings from Troy to Italy, while the poem's second half describes the Trojans' eventually successful struggle against the Latins—under whose name Aeneas and his Trojan allies are destined to be absorbed—before Aeneas and his Trojan companions were submerged.
Learn more about Aeneid here:
brainly.com/question/28883792
#SPJ4
What were the causes and effects of the German economic crisis of the 1920s and the global depression of the 1930s?
Answer:
- Causes of the German Economic Crisis of the 1920s: Reparations imposed by the Treaty of Versailles after World War I left Germany with a huge debt burden that it struggled to pay.
- Effects of the German Economic Crisis of the 1920s: Hyperinflation wiped out the savings of many Germans and led to social unrest.
Explanation:
The German economic crisis of the 1920s and the global depression of the 1930s were two interconnected events that had long-lasting effects on the world economy and political landscape. Here are the causes and effects of both events:
Causes of the German Economic Crisis of the 1920s:
Reparations imposed by the Treaty of Versailles after World War I left Germany with a huge debt burden that it struggled to pay.
The government's decision to print money to pay off the debt led to hyperinflation, with prices increasing at an astronomical rate.
The loss of foreign markets due to protectionist policies in other countries, such as high tariffs, also hurt the German economy.
Effects of the German Economic Crisis of the 1920s:
Hyperinflation wiped out the savings of many Germans and led to social unrest.
The economic turmoil created an environment in which extremist political movements, such as the Nazi Party, gained popularity.
The crisis weakened the Weimar Republic, the German government established after World War I, and made it vulnerable to political instability.
Causes of the Global Depression of the 1930s:
The stock market crash of 1929 in the United States sparked a worldwide economic downturn.
Overproduction and overinvestment in the 1920s led to a glut of goods and falling prices.
Protectionist policies, such as high tariffs and trade barriers, reduced international trade and worsened the economic situation.
Effects of the Global Depression of the 1930s:
Unemployment rates soared, and many people lost their homes and savings.
Governments around the world implemented austerity measures to try and balance their budgets, leading to further economic hardship.
The depression contributed to the rise of authoritarian regimes in Europe, including Nazi Germany and fascist Italy.
In summary, the German economic crisis of the 1920s and the global depression of the 1930s were both rooted in economic and political factors that led to widespread hardship and instability. These events had long-lasting effects on the world economy and political landscape, contributing to the rise of extremist movements and authoritarian regimes, as well as the eventual outbreak of World War II.
Why did many Americans wish to limit the immigration of Jews into the United States during the 1930s?
During the 1930s, many Americans wished to limit the immigration of Jews into the United States due to prevalent anti-Semitism, economic concerns during the Great Depression, national security fears, and cultural/religious biases.
During the 1930s, many Americans sought to limit the immigration of Jews into the United States for various reasons. Anti-Semitism was widespread, with deep-seated stereotypes and prejudices against Jews fueling discrimination. Economic concerns stemming from the Great Depression led some to believe that restricting Jewish immigration would alleviate job competition. National security fears emerged as tensions rose in Europe, with suspicions of spies or subversive elements entering the country. Cultural and religious biases also played a role, as some perceived Jews as different or incompatible with American values. These motivations, rooted in prejudice and discrimination, led to restrictive immigration policies, reflecting a darker chapter in American history. It is important to recognize the injustice of these attitudes and the subsequent efforts made to promote equality and inclusivity.In conclusion, during the 1930s, restrictions on Jewish immigration to the United States were driven by anti-Semitism, economic anxieties, national security fears, and cultural biases against Jews.
For more questions on immigration of Jews:
https://brainly.com/question/30288223
#SPJ8
A. Women could not find jobs outside of the home because of gender discrimination. B. Women who did not have children were more likely to join women's rights protests. C. Women had to struggle to obtain equality with men in certain areas of life. . Women did not believe that men and women had completely separate motivations
The statements provided highlight key aspects of the women's rights movement and gender dynamics. Women faced gender discrimination that limited their job opportunities, and this inequality motivated them to strive for equality in various areas of life.
Women who didn't have children were more likely to participate in women's rights protests, indicating a connection between personal experiences and activism. Additionally, women challenged the notion of complete separation of motivations between men and women. These factors contributed to the struggle for women's rights and the fight for gender equality.
A. Women's limited access to jobs outside of the home was a result of gender discrimination prevalent in society. Traditional gender roles confined women to domestic responsibilities, reinforcing the idea that their place was primarily within the household. This systemic discrimination denied women economic opportunities and perpetuated gender inequality. The recognition of this injustice fueled the women's rights movement, as women sought to challenge and dismantle societal barriers.
B. Women who did not have children played a significant role in the women's rights movement. Their experiences and perspectives differed from those of mothers, and they often faced distinct challenges and expectations. Without the traditional role of motherhood, these women were freer to participate in activism and protests. Their involvement demonstrated the intersectionality of women's rights and the acknowledgment that gender discrimination affected women regardless of their maternal status.
C. The struggle for equality encompassed various aspects of women's lives. Women fought for equal rights in areas such as education, employment, legal rights, and political representation. The movement sought to challenge patriarchal structures that perpetuated gender inequalities and denied women equal opportunities. The goal was to create a more inclusive society where women could enjoy the same rights and privileges as men. This struggle for equality extended beyond individual experiences and encompassed broader societal transformation.
D. Women's activism challenged the notion of complete separation of motivations between men and women. The belief that men and women had inherently different motivations perpetuated gender stereotypes and reinforced gender inequality. The women's rights movement sought to debunk these stereotypes by advocating for equal treatment and recognition of women's agency, aspirations, and motivations. Women asserted that their motivations were diverse and complex, and they deserved the same opportunities as men.
In summary, women faced gender discrimination that limited their job prospects, motivating them to fight for equality in various aspects of life. Women without children played a significant role in the movement, highlighting the intersectionality of women's rights. The struggle for equality encompassed multiple spheres of society, challenging patriarchal structures. Moreover, women contested the notion of complete separation of motivations between men and women, advocating for recognition of their agency and equal treatment. These factors collectively contributed to the ongoing struggle for women's rights and the pursuit of gender equality.
Learn more about gender discrimination here:
brainly.com/question/29404586
#SPJ11
What were the origins of World War I? How did contemporaries of the war try to explain its origin and how have those accounts been supported or refuted by later scholars?
Please explain as much as possible
The origins of World War I can be traced back to a complex web of political, economic, and social factors that existed in Europe during the early 20th century. The immediate trigger for the war was the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria-Hungary in Sarajevo on June 28, 1914, by a Serbian nationalist.
Contemporaries of the war tried to explain its origin through various perspectives. Some blamed Germany for its aggressive expansionist policies and militaristic ambitions, while others blamed the complex system of alliances that existed in Europe, particularly the alliance system between Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy known as the Triple Alliance, and the alliance between France, Russia, and Britain known as the Triple Entente.
Later scholars have offered different interpretations and analysis of the origins of World War I. The debates have centered on several key theories, including the "Fischer thesis" which argues that Germany was primarily responsible for the war, and the "primacy of domestic politics" thesis which suggests that internal political and social factors within each country played a significant role.
Scholars have extensively studied and analyzed primary sources, diplomatic correspondence, and historical records to support or refute these accounts. They have examined the role of individual leaders, the impact of alliance systems, the influence of public opinion, economic factors, and the complex interplay of multiple causes.
Overall, the origins of World War I continue to be a subject of debate and interpretation among historians, with ongoing research shedding new light on the complex causes and dynamics that led to one of the deadliest conflicts in human history.
for more questions on World War I
https://brainly.com/question/446364
#SPJ8
If Texas would get annexed to the United States, what compromise would NOT be as significant?
A Mississippi Compromise
B Missouri Compromise
C The Great Compromise of 1787
Answer:
A. Mississippi Compromise.
Explanation:
Distinguish Fact from Opinion How do you think Americans considered Native Americans during the expansion period? How does this relate to the belief in manifest destiny?
In the expansion period, the Native Americans were regarded as uncivilized, backward, and primitive people who lacked culture, language, and the political structure.
Fact is a statement that can be proven while an opinion is a statement that is a personal view of the person expressing it. Americans thought that they were superior to Native Americans and therefore had the right to take over their land and resources.
Europeans believed that the land was empty and no one was utilizing it. The American expansionist theory of Manifest Destiny was the idea that America was a divine right to occupy and govern all the land from the Atlantic Ocean to the Pacific Ocean. Americans regarded it as a moral and religious duty to expand and develop the country.
To know more about Americans visit:
https://brainly.com/question/8678061
#SPJ11
What does the term historical thinking skills mean?
A. Skills applied when evaluating a short story
B. Skills applied when analyzing evidence to study the past
C. Skills applied when creating modern political maps
D. Skills applied when comparing scientific theories
Answer: B
Explanation: did you even read the answers Lol
What is the largest and most heavily used collection in the Prints and Photographic Division of the Library of Congress?
The Popular Culture Series
the HABS/HAER Collections
the Civil War files
the Classic Cinema Collection
Approximately how many historic structures and sites are represented in the HABS/HAER Collections?
3 million
11,230
175,390
38,600
The largest and most heavily used collection in the Prints and Photographic Division of the Library of Congress is the HABS/HAER Collections.
The HABS/HAER Collections represent about 38,600 historic structures and sites.The Historic American Buildings Survey (HABS) and the Historic American Engineering Record (HAER) collections are part of the Prints and Photographs Division of the Library of Congress, which has a collection of about 16 million photographs, drawings, and prints related to architecture, engineering, and design.HABS/HAER collections contain around 38,600 documented structures, sites, and landscapes in the United States and its territories. It is one of the largest and most heavily used collections in the Prints and Photographic Division of the Library of Congress.What is HABS and HAER?The Historic American Buildings Survey (HABS) and the Historic American Engineering Record (HAER) are two separate collections of measured drawings, large-format photographs, and written historical reports on buildings and other structures in the United States.The two collections, which are administered by the National Park Service, were established in 1933 to document architecture, engineering, and other significant sites in America’s history and are the largest federal programs of their type.
To know more about Photographic visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1203534
#SPJ11
Please write 1 paragraph with a thesis on the following 2 texts and use the outline I created below to help discuss the 2 texts.
WEB DuBois’s "Close Ranks" Article in Crisis (1918)
and
Soviet Union, The History of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (1938)
Introductory paragraph
Thesis and brief layout
WEB DuBois's article "Close Ranks" was published in The Crisis in 1918, and The History of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union was published in 1938. Both of these texts are historically significant and reveal how their authors approached the issue of race and revolution in different ways.
DuBois saw the fight for civil rights as a way to gain respect and dignity for Black Americans in the United States, whereas the Soviet Union's Communist Party believed that the abolition of class society and the creation of a proletarian society would ultimately lead to the end of racial inequality. While these texts present distinct and opposing viewpoints, they also share common themes about social change and the importance of collective action. DuBois's "Close Ranks" article was written during a time of war, and it expressed a call for unity among Black Americans in the face of adversity. DuBois believed that African Americans needed to support the war effort in order to prove their loyalty and worthiness as citizens. He argued that Black Americans needed to "close ranks" and show that they were just as capable and patriotic as white Americans. This sentiment was not universally accepted within the Black community, as some saw the war effort as an extension of white supremacy. However, DuBois's article served as a rallying cry for many Black Americans, who saw the fight for civil rights as a way to gain respect and dignity in a society that had long oppressed them.
On the other hand, The History of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union presented a different perspective on the role of race in revolutionary struggle. The Communist Party believed that the struggle for socialism was inextricably linked to the abolition of class society and the creation of a society in which all people were equal. The Soviet Union's approach to race was not to address it directly but to work towards the abolition of all forms of oppression through a proletarian revolution. This belief system had a significant impact on the international communist movement and inspired many to view the struggle for socialism as the ultimate solution to all forms of oppression. In conclusion, WEB DuBois's "Close Ranks" and The History of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union present different approaches to race and revolution. DuBois believed that the fight for civil rights was essential to gain respect and dignity for Black Americans, while the Soviet Union's Communist Party believed that the abolition of class society was the key to ending all forms of oppression. Despite their different perspectives, both texts highlight the importance of collective action and social change.
To know more about Communist Party visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/32383363
#SPJ11
What current issues are there in the middle east and can we make any ties to historical events (crusades through the creation of Israel) that still are true?
The Middle East is currently facing various ongoing issues, including conflicts, political instability, sectarian tensions, and economic challenges. These issues can be linked to historical events such as the Crusades and the creation of Israel, which have had long-lasting consequences on the region.
The Middle East continues to grapple with several significant challenges in the present day. One of the major issues is the prevalence of conflicts and political instability. Countries like Syria, Yemen, and Iraq have experienced prolonged conflicts, leading to immense human suffering, displacement, and the rise of extremist groups. These conflicts often have complex historical roots, including colonial legacies, ethnic and sectarian tensions, and power struggles among regional and international actors.
Sectarian tensions also persist in the region, particularly between Sunni and Shia communities. Historical events, such as the early Islamic schism and subsequent power struggles, have contributed to the sectarian divide, which is further exacerbated by contemporary political rivalries and proxy wars.
The Israeli-Palestinian conflict remains a central issue in the Middle East. The establishment of the State of Israel in 1948 and subsequent conflicts have resulted in ongoing disputes over land, resources, and self-determination. The historical connection to the creation of Israel has left a lasting impact on the region, influencing geopolitical dynamics, inter-state relations, and regional alliances.
Moreover, economic challenges, including high unemployment rates, poverty, and income inequality, continue to be pressing issues in many Middle Eastern countries. Historical factors such as colonialism, exploitation of resources, and unequal distribution of wealth have shaped the region's economic landscape, leading to socio-economic disparities and political grievances.
While it is important to acknowledge the historical context and its influence on current issues in the Middle East, it is crucial to approach these complexities with nuance and avoid oversimplifications. The region's challenges are multifaceted and interconnected, necessitating a comprehensive understanding and a holistic approach towards finding sustainable solutions.
Learn more about economic challenges here:
brainly.com/question/30109620
#SPJ11
Make Generalizations What factors might influence your opinion of a candidate during a political debate?
The factors that might influence my opinion of a candidate during a political debate are their knowledge, experience, and communication skills.
The ability to convey their message clearly and concisely can impact my overall opinion of the candidate. Furthermore, their knowledge of the topics discussed can show their expertise in a particular area and increase their credibility. Finally, their experience in the political arena can also affect my opinion, as it shows their track record and how they handle different situations.Overall, a candidate's knowledge, experience, and communication skills are essential factors that can impact my opinion of them during a political debate. These factors can demonstrate their expertise, credibility, and ability to convey their message effectively.
During a general election campaign, a leaders' debate, also known as a presidential debate, is a public debate in which candidates discuss their political views, proposals for public policy, and criticisms of those positions with potential voters. On radio, television, and the Internet, they are typically broadcast live.
Know more about political debate, here:
https://brainly.com/question/29612206
#SPJ11
Make Inferences What does the painting convey about army life?
The painting by George Caleb Bingham titled, "The County Election," depicts life in the mid-1800s in America. The painting conveys a lot of information about the American army life, which we can infer based on the context.
Firstly, we can see that the army life was pretty busy, and people lived in cramped spaces. Soldiers in the painting are standing and sitting together in a room with not much personal space, indicating that their lives are not private and sometimes can be uncomfortable.
Secondly, we can observe that army life often involved physical labor. The soldiers in the painting are wearing uniforms, and many have muscular arms and broad shoulders. This gives us the idea that the soldiers have to go through a lot of rigorous physical training, especially when they are at a young age and new to the army.Lastly, army life could have been quite lonely.
There are no women in the painting, and only men can be seen. The soldiers are crowded together, so it seems unlikely that they could have found time or space to have personal relationships. Therefore, we can infer that life in the army can be isolating and lonely. To sum up, the painting conveys a sense of a busy and physically demanding life, as well as a life that can be lonely and lacks personal space.
To know more about painting visit:
https://brainly.com/question/16924169
#SPJ11
How did the Vietnam War's end impact US politics, military, and economy? Which of the troubling aspects of the 1970s do you think was directly connected with the end of the war, or the country's involvement in that war? Why do you think that might be the case? How do you think the troubles with the Watergate Crisis connected with the war's end? How did all of these issues impact Gerald Ford as he tried to put the presidency back together after Nixon's resignation?
The end of the Vietnam War had immense repercussions for US politics, military, and economy. Politically, the war brought about a great deal of division and mistrust in the federal government among the American public.
The military was often seen as ineffective due to its inability to adequately prosecute the war and was placed under intense scrutiny. The economy also suffered from the costly war effort, with the federal government drastically increasing its spending and thus spiking inflation. One of the most troubling aspects of the 1970s was how the American public felt betrayed by their government after the war effort failed.
The Watergate Crisis, in particular, essentially sealed Nixon’s resignation and had a lasting negative impact on US politics. This resulted in Gerald Ford having to try to put the presidency back together by restoring public confidence in the government. He tried to do so by pardoning Nixon and allowing the nation to move on. This was a difficult task and the lasting effects of the war could still be seen in the US broadly.
know more about Vietnam War here
https://brainly.com/question/31746600#
#SPJ11
Who takes over if a president dies in office or is unable to serve? The top five in the line of succession follow:
• vice-president
• speaker of the house
• president pro tempore of the Senate
• secretary of state
• secretary of the treasury
Why should voters know the views of the vicepresident?
If a president dies or is unable to serve, the vice-president will take over as president of the United States. In the United States, the top five in the line of succession follow.
Vice-President, Speaker of the House, President pro tempore of the Senate, Secretary of State, and Secretary of the Treasury.The views of the vice president are significant, and voters should be aware of them because in case anything happens to the president, the vice president will take over as president of the United States.
The views of the vice president may differ from those of the president, and it is essential that voters understand the vice president's views. In this way, they will have a better understanding of the current administration's goals and how they may impact the nation.
To know more about succession visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1291604
#SPJ11
WHAT IF? How might the course of the war been affected if Germany had been successful in getting Mexico to declare war on the United States?
If Germany had succeeded in getting Mexico to declare war on the United States, the course of World War I would have been very different. Mexico had been struggling with internal conflicts for years and was in no position to engage in a war with the United States.
In addition, the United States was not a neutral party in World War I. Although the country had not yet entered the war, it was providing significant financial and material support to the Allies. Therefore, a declaration of war by Mexico against the United States would have been a clear provocation of war, and the United States would have had a legitimate reason to enter the war.
In conclusion, if Germany had succeeded in getting Mexico to declare war on the United States, the United States would have had a legitimate reason to enter the war, which may have changed the outcome of World War I.
To know more about World War visit:
https://brainly.com/question/925121
#SPJ11
Use 3-5 sentences to answer the question. Must use at least 1 example to support your claim.
Were the Emancipation Proclamation and Gettysburg Address merely empty gestures, or did they represent a significant change in the purpose of the war?
Disclaimer: This answer is in my own words, and it is also my own opinion. But I hope this helps you!
The Emancipation Proclamation of 1863 and the Gettysburg Address of 1863 didn't exactly change the purpose, or output of the American Civil War. It's known that the Emancipation Proclamation didn't truly free all slaves; rather, it freed those who weren't under Union control. The American Civil War rooted from slavery, and the status of African American citizens. As we've seen, despise his best efforts, Lincoln's speeches didn't change the fact that slavery was still happening. Therefore, this makes the speeches seem null and void - nothing more than empty gestures, and empty promises for a better future.
Again, this is my opinion, feel free to tweak this in any way you want.
10.9 globalization and the changing environment key ideas
The term "globalization" is used for describing how technology and trade have increased connectivity and interdependence around the world. The environmental change caused due to both human, as well as natural processes.
Technology, cross-border trade in goods and services, and flows of capital, labor, and information have all contributed to the growing interdependence of economies, cultures, and populations all over the world, which is referred to as "globalization."
Each nation is encouraged to focus on producing the best goods with the fewest resources through globalizationLarger markets allow businesses to access more consumers and generate greater returns on their fixed operating expenses, such as constructing factories or doing research. US companies are compelled to improve their products by international competition. As a result, consumers have more options and better products.Environmental change is a variation or disruption of the environment commonly caused by human activities and natural ecological processes.
Environmental changes include numerous components, such as environmental disasters, human interference, or wildlife interaction. Environmental systems and human activities both contribute to environmental changes by converting and moving a lot of energy and materials. Through the cycling of materials through geological, biological, oceanic, and atmospheric processes natural systems convert the sun's energy into living matter and bring about changes.To learn more about Globalization
https://brainly.com/question/12894350
Globalization and the changing environment are two interconnected phenomena that have significant implications for the world today.
Globalization refers to the increasing interconnectedness and interdependence of countries and people across the globe. It involves the exchange of goods, services, information, and ideas, facilitated by advancements in technology, communication, and transportation. Globalization has led to the integration of economies, the growth of multinational corporations, and the flow of capital, labor, and technology across borders.
The changing environment refers to the ongoing shifts in the Earth's natural systems, including climate change, biodiversity loss, deforestation, pollution, and resource depletion. These environmental changes are largely driven by human activities, such as industrialization, urbanization, and the unsustainable use of natural resources.
Conversely, the changing environment also affects globalization. Climate change, for instance, poses risks to infrastructure, agriculture, and supply chains, disrupting global trade and economic stability. Environmental concerns have prompted the development of sustainability initiatives, such as green technologies, renewable energy, and circular economy practices, which aim to mitigate environmental impacts and promote a more sustainable form of globalization.
know more about Globalization here:
https://brainly.com/question/25499191
#SPJ8
Since the southern colonies had a(n) enslaved people. _, they relied on the labor of O A. agricultural economy O B. shortage of paid labor • c. urban environment O D. large population
identify a word that means the opposite of seced
Answer:
The word that means the opposite of "secede" is "unite" or "reunite."
Why did the fighting begin at Lexington?
A British military operation to seize and destroy military supplies kept by the colonial militia in Concord served as the immediate reason for Lexington fight.
The American Revolutionary War started with the battles at Lexington. The British government intended to impose authority over the increasingly disobedient colonists because they were worried about a possible rebellion. To complete their mission, the British troops set out on a march from Boston to Concord. However, riders like Paul Revere had informed the colonial militia of their whereabouts, and local militia companies began mobilizing. The minutemen, a small detachment of the colonial militia known as the militia, were gathering on Lexington Green as the British troops neared Lexington soon.
Whoever fired the opening shot is still unknown, but a clash that followed claimed multiple lives. The British army then carried on moving in the direction of Concord. As soon as word of the battle at Lexington spread, the colonial militia at Concord grew more hostile towards the British troops. Throughout the day, the combat intensified as militia forces pursued the British as they fled to Boston, resulting in more deaths on both sides.
Read more about Lexington on:
https://brainly.com/question/1600992
#SPJ4
Look at the image below which South African social policy is the beginning implant separate but equal Jim crow law segregation apartheid
The South African social policy that is comparable to the concept of "separate but equal" in the United States and the Jim Crow laws is the policy of apartheid.
Apartheid was a system of institutionalized racial segregation and discrimination that was enforced by the South African government from 1948 to 1994. Under apartheid, the population was classified into different racial groups, primarily Black, White, Colored, and Indian, and each group was assigned separate residential areas, schools, hospitals, and other public amenities. This policy aimed to maintain white minority rule and reinforce social, economic, and political inequalities based on race.
Apartheid differed from the concept of "separate but equal" in the United States in some ways, but both systems were characterized by the idea of segregation based on race. However, apartheid was far more extensive and oppressive, with a comprehensive legal framework that enforced racial separation and discrimination in all aspects of life, including marriage, employment, and political rights.
It resulted in severe human rights abuses and resistance movements, such as the African National Congress (ANC), which played a pivotal role in the eventual dismantling of apartheid and the establishment of a non-racial democracy in South Africa.
for more questions on laws
https://brainly.com/question/820417
#SPJ8
the effects humans have on the South American continent to those that effect the African Continent.
THIS MIGHT NOT BE WHAT YOU ARE LOOKING FOR! READ FIRST!
Humans have had a significant impact on both the South American and African continents. Some of the most notable effects include:
Deforestation: The clearing of forests for agriculture, timber, and other purposes has been a major problem in both South America and Africa. In South America, deforestation has been particularly severe in the Amazon rainforest, which is home to a vast diversity of plant and animal life. In Africa, deforestation has been a major factor in the loss of savannas and other important ecosystems.
Pollution: Air, water, and soil pollution are all major problems in both South America and Africa. In South America, industrial pollution is a major problem, particularly in the Amazon region. In Africa, agricultural pollution is a major problem, particularly in areas where fertilizers and pesticides are used heavily.
Overpopulation: Both South America and Africa are experiencing rapid population growth, which is putting a strain on natural resources and leading to environmental degradation. In South America, the population is expected to double by 2050. In Africa, the population is expected to triple by 2050.
Climate change: Both South America and Africa are vulnerable to the effects of climate change, such as rising sea levels, more extreme weather events, and changes in precipitation patterns. Climate change is already having a significant impact on both continents, and the effects are expected to become more severe in the future.
In addition to these general effects, there are also some specific ways in which humans have impacted South America and Africa differently. For example, the introduction of non-native species has been a major problem in South America, but it has not been as significant a problem in Africa. Similarly, the mining industry has had a major impact on the environment in South America, but it has not been as significant a problem in Africa.
Overall, humans have had a significant impact on both the South American and African continents. This impact has been both positive and negative, and it is likely to continue to grow in the future. It is important to understand the effects of human activity on these continents so that we can take steps to mitigate the negative effects and preserve the natural resources that they contain.
John calvin was arguably more influential in the spread of protestantism than martin luther. what were his core beliefs? on what areas did he agree with luther? where did he disagree with luther?
John Calvin's core beliefs include predestination, salvation by faith alone, and biblical authority. He agreed with Luther on his rejection of papal authority but disagreed on the nature of the Eucharist.
John Calvin, a key figure in the Protestant Reformation, had core beliefs that revolved around the concept of predestination, biblical authority, and the idea of salvation by faith alone. Calvin and Luther agreed on important theological aspects such as the rejection of papal authority, emphasis on Scripture as the supreme authority, and belief in salvation by faith.
However, they disagree on the nature of the Eucharist, especially the concept of Christ's presence. Calvin advocates symbolic presence, while Luther believes in a more literal presence known as oneness.
Learn more about predestination:
https://brainly.com/question/18460867
#SPJ4
1. What is the similarity between Voltaire’s Candide and Rousseau’s Confessions in terms of the
characters described in their works?
2. According to the "Introduction" to Rousseau, what is the difference between Rousseau and
Montaigne?
3. What is the career of the narrator (the character "I")’s father in Rousseau’s Confessions? How do his parents meet up and interact with each other before their marriage?
The similarity between Voltaire's Candide and Rousseau's Confessions lies in their portrayal of flawed and complex characters, showcasing the human condition in different ways.
Both Voltaire's Candide and Rousseau's Confessions delve into the depths of human nature through their depiction of characters. In Candide, Voltaire presents a wide range of characters who embody various flaws and virtues, highlighting the complexities of human behavior. The protagonist, Candide, is portrayed as naive and optimistic, constantly encountering challenging situations that test his worldview. Similarly, Rousseau's Confessions explores the inner workings of the narrator's mind, revealing his introspective and often contradictory nature. The characters in Confessions are depicted with their vices and virtues, providing a nuanced understanding of human psychology.
Voltaire and Rousseau use their characters as vehicles to comment on societal norms, religious beliefs, and philosophical ideas prevalent during their respective times. Through their works, both authors challenge prevailing conventions and offer alternative perspectives on human nature. While Voltaire employs satire and irony to critique societal institutions and expose hypocrisy, Rousseau's introspective style allows for a deeper exploration of the human psyche. Despite their distinct writing styles, both authors share a common goal of dissecting human behavior and revealing the flaws inherent in society.
Learn more about Candide
brainly.com/question/30639268
#SPJ11
Why was William Henry Harrison already considered a national figure before the election of 1840?
A. He was considered a war hero.
B. He held a debate about the Indian Removal Act.
C. He served in Congress