Im stuck plissss heeeelp ;w

By solving a positive number over a variable (or vice versa) both raised to a negative power  ,The simplified expression is [tex]\frac{8}{x^{3} }[/tex].

To solve an expression with a positive number over a variable, both raised to a negative power, you should follow these steps:

1. Identify the base and exponent: In your example, the base is (x/2) and the exponent is -3.

2. Apply the negative exponent rule: When an expression with a negative exponent is raised to a power, you can rewrite it with a positive exponent by taking the reciprocal of the base.

The negative exponent rule states that [tex]a^{-n}[/tex] = 1/([tex]a^{n}[/tex]), where 'a' is the base and 'n' is the exponent.

3. In your example, apply the negative exponent rule to [tex](x/2)^{-3}[/tex] This becomes 1/([tex](x/2)^{-3}[/tex]).

4. Simplify the expression: Raise the base (x/2) to the power of 3. Remember that when you raise a fraction to an exponent, you should raise both the numerator and denominator to that exponent. So, [tex](x/2)^{-3}[/tex] = ([tex]X^{3}[/tex])/([tex]2^{3}[/tex]) =[tex]\frac{x^{3}}{8 }[/tex]

5. Substitute the simplified expression back into the original equation: 1/(([tex](x/2)^{3}[/tex]) = 1/([tex]\frac{x^{3}}{8 }[/tex]).

6. To further simplify, remember that dividing by a fraction is equivalent to multiplying by its reciprocal. So, 1/([tex]\frac{x^{3}}{8 }[/tex]) = 1 * ([tex]\frac{8}{x^{3} }[/tex]) = [tex]\frac{8}{x^{3} }[/tex].

The simplified expression is [tex]\frac{8}{x^{3} }[/tex]. This is how you solve an expression with a positive number over a variable, both raised to a negative power.

Know more about  positive number   here:

https://brainly.com/question/29544326

#SPJ11

The total area of the figure is 784 cm². Hence option C is correct.

Given that,

The figure given below is comprised of two congruent squares and two congruent triangles.

Length of each side of the square = x

Area of a square = x²

There are 2 squares.

Total area of the square = 2x²

Each triangle has base = 2x and the height = x.

Area of a triangle   = 1/2 × 2x × x

                               = x²

Area of 2 triangles = 2x²

Total area = 4x²

When x = 14 cm,

Total area = 4 × 14² = 784 cm²

Hence the total area of the figure is 784 cm².

Learn more about Area here :

https://brainly.com/question/19305981

#SPJ1

The value of tanC is 7/24

Trigonometric Ratios are defined as the values of all the trigonometric functions based on the value of the ratio of sides in a right-angled triangle.

Sin(tetha) = opp/hyp

cos(tetha) = adj/hyp

tan(tetha) = opp/adj

Using Pythagoras theorem, we need to find the adjascent to angle C

adj = √ 50²-14²

adj = √(2500-196)

adj = √ 2304

adj = 48

Therefore tanC = 14/48

= 7/24

therefore the value of tanC = 7/24

learn more about trigonometric ratio from

https://brainly.com/question/24349828

#SPJ1

The confidence interval estimate of the difference between two population means is a range of values that we can be confident contains the true difference between the means.

To calculate the confidence interval estimate of the difference between two population means, we need to use the formula:

CI = (x₁ - x₂) ± tα/2 ×SE

where x1 and x2 are the sample means, tα/2 is the critical value from the t-distribution table at a chosen level of significance α/2, and SE is the standard error of the difference between the two means.

The confidence interval estimate gives us a range of values within which we can be confident that the true difference between the two population means lies. The margin of error is determined by the critical value and the standard error.

It is important to note that a negative value for the confidence interval estimate indicates that the mean of the first population is smaller than the mean of the second population. Conversely, a positive value indicates that the mean of the first population is larger than the mean of the second population.

In summary, the confidence interval estimate of the difference between two population means is a range of values that we can be confident contains the true difference between the means. The margin of error is determined by the critical value and the standard error. A negative value indicates that the mean of the first population is smaller than the mean of the second population, while a positive value indicates the opposite.

To calculate the confidence interval estimate, we need to obtain two samples from the populations of interest, calculate the sample means and the standard deviation of each sample, and then calculate the standard error of the difference between the means. The critical value is determined based on the level of significance chosen for the test, and the degrees of freedom, which depend on the sample sizes. Once we have all the necessary values, we can use the formula to calculate the confidence interval estimate. The confidence interval is typically expressed as a percentage, with 95% being the most commonly used level of significance.

Learn more about Range:

brainly.com/question/29204101

#SPJ11

To solve this problem, we need to use the formula for calculating the class average:

average = (sum of all scores) / number of scores

Currently, we know that the class average is 70 and that the instructor has graded 19 papers. This means that the sum of all scores so far is:

sum of all scores = 70 * 19 = 1330

To raise the class average by 1 point, we need to find out what the sum of all scores would be if the last paper had a score that was 1 point higher than the current average. Let's call this score "x".

sum of all scores + x = 20 * 71

1330 + x = 1420

x = 90

Therefore, the score on the last paper would have to be 90 in order to raise the class average by 1 point.

To raise the class average by 2 points, we would use the same formula, but this time we would add 2 points to the current average:

sum of all scores + x = 20 * 72

1330 + x = 1440

x = 110

Therefore, the score on the last paper would have to be 110 in order to raise the class average by 2 points.

It's important to note that these scores are the maximum possible scores on the last paper that would raise the class average by the specified number of points. It's possible that the score on the last paper could be lower and still raise the class average by 1 or 2 points, depending on the exact values of the other scores.

Learn more about average here:

https://brainly.com/question/24057012

#SPJ11

A) True.  creating a rectangle in ANSYS geometry step will have an impact on the mathematical model.

In a boundary value problem, the governing equations describe the physics of the problem and how the system behaves. These equations are typically written in terms of the dependent variables, such as temperature, pressure, or velocity, and their derivatives with respect to time and space. The domain refers to the region of space where the equations are valid and the solution is sought. The boundary conditions specify the values of the dependent variables or their derivatives at the boundaries of the domain.

When we create a rectangle in ANSYS geometry, we are defining the shape and size of the domain for the problem we want to solve. This domain will be used to apply the governing equations and boundary conditions, and it affects the solution obtained from the ANSYS solver. For example, if we are modeling heat transfer in a rectangular block, the size and shape of the block will affect the heat transfer rate and temperature distribution within the block.

Therefore, the geometry we create in ANSYS directly affects the mathematical model, as it defines the domain and, as a result, affects the governing equations and boundary conditions applied to that domain. Any changes made to the geometry will alter the mathematical model and the resulting solution from the ANSYS solver.

Visit to know more about Geometry:-

brainly.com/question/19241268

#SPJ11

The answer is (d.) (x - 2)^2 = 9, which is equivalent to the original equation when completing the square.  To solve the given quadratic equation using the completing the square method, we'll rewrite the equation in the form (x - h)² = k.

Given equation: 0 = 3x² - 12x - 15

First, let's divide by 3 to simplify the equation:

0 = x² - 4x - 5

Next, let's complete the square by adding and subtracting the square of half the coefficient of x:

0 = (x² - 4x + 4) - 5 - 4

Now, we can rewrite the left side as a perfect square:

0 = (x - 2)² - 9

Finally, add 9 to both sides to get the equation in the desired form:

(x - 2)² = 9

So the correct answer is (d.) (x - 2)² = 9.

Learn more about square here:

https://brainly.com/question/28776767

#SPJ11

The equation that represents the line is y = 9x + 6

This is calculated as

Slope = Change in cost/DVDs

So, we have

Slope = (24 - 15)/(2 - 1)

Slope = 9

In this problem, the slope represents the cost per number of DVD

So, the slope is $9 per DVD

We have

Slope = 9

So, the y-intercept is

y-intercept = 15 - 9

y-intercept = 6

In this context, the y‐intercept represents the initial cost

So, the y‐intercept (i.e. the initial cost) is $6

This is calculated as

y = mx + c

So, we have

y = 9x + 6

Read more about linear relation at

https://brainly.com/question/30318449

#SPJ1

The perimeter of the rectangle is 13.30 units

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

(-2 , -2), (1, -1.5) and (-1, 1.5)

The side lengths are calculated using

Lentghs = √[(x2 - x1)² + (y2 - y1)²]

So, we have

Lentgh 1 = √[(-2 - 1)² + (-2 + 1.5)²] = 3.04

Lentgh 2 = √[(1 + 1)² + (-1.5 - 1.5)²] = 3.61

So, we have

PErimeter = 2 * (3.04 + 3.61)

Evaluate

PErimeter = 13.30

Hence, the perimeter is 13.30

Read more about perimeter at

https://brainly.com/question/17297081

#SPJ1

The perimeter of the rectangle is  6*√10  units

We need to find the lengths of the two sides of the rectangle.

For the top side (the shorter one) this is an hypotenuse of a right triangle with sides of 3 and 1, then it measures:

L = √(3² + 1²) = √10

The lateral side measures:

L' = √(2² + 6²) = √40 = 2√10

Then the perimeter is:

P = 2*(√10 + 2√10)

P = 6*√10

LEarn more about perimeter at.

https://brainly.com/question/24571594

#SPJ1

Gigi cut her cake into 12 slices.

Let X represent number of slices that each of them cut their cake.

Emma served 4 slices, so she must have cut her cake into:

= 2/3 * x = 4

Solving for x, we get:

x = 6

For Renee:

2/3 * x = 6

Solving for x, we get:

x = 9

To get number of slices that Gigi cut her cake into:

2/3 * x = 8

Solving for x, we get:

x = 12

Read more about Proportion

brainly.com/question/1496357

#SPJ1

The area of the shaded sector is given as follows:

C. 3 m².

The area of the shaded sector is obtained applying the proportions in the context of the problem.

The shaded sector has an angle of 90º, while the entire circle constitutes an angle measure of 360º, hence the fraction of the area represented by the shaded sector is given as follows:

90/360 = 1/4.

The area of the circle is of 12 m², hence the area of the shaded sector is given as follows:

1/4 x 12 = 3 m².

The shaded sector has an angle of 90º.

More can be learned about proportions at https://brainly.com/question/24372153

#SPJ1

For every positive integer n, there are n consecutive composite integers.

We will prove the statement using the fact that every integer greater than 1 is either prime or can be factored into a product of primes.

Consider the n consecutive integers starting with (n+1)!+2, which are:

(n+1)!+2, (n+1)!+3, (n+1)!+4, ..., (n+1)!+n+1

We will show that each of these integers is composite.

First, note that (n+1)!+2 is composite, since it is greater than 2 and can be factored as 2*(n+1)!/2 + 1.

Next, for each i between 2 and n+1, inclusive, we have:

(n+1)!+i = i*((n+1)!/i) + i

Since i divides (n+1)!, we have (n+1)!/i as an integer, and since i is between 2 and n+1, we have (n+1)!/i greater than 1. Thus, (n+1)!+i can be factored into a product of at least two integers, i and (n+1)!/i + 1. Since i is between 2 and n+1, we have (n+1)!/i + 1 between 3 and (n+1), inclusive. Therefore, (n+1)!+i is composite.

Thus, each of the n integers (n+1)!+2, (n+1)!+3, ..., (n+1)!+n+1 is composite, as desired. Therefore, for every positive integer n, there are n consecutive composite integers.

To learn more about product visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29675824

#SPJ11

To test these hypotheses, you would gather a random sample of this year's entering students, calculate their mean IQ, and compare it to the historical mean IQ of previous years. Then, using a suitable statistical test like a t-test, you would determine if there's enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis, thus supporting the professor's claim.

The null hypothesis (H0) for this hypothesis test would be that there is no difference in mean IQ scores between this year's entering students and entering students from previous years. The alternative hypothesis (Ha) would be that this year's entering students have a higher mean IQ score than entering students from previous years.

Symbolically, we can represent the hypotheses as follows:

H0: μ = μ0 (where μ is the population mean IQ score for this year's entering students and μ0 is the mean IQ score for entering students from previous years)

Ha: μ > μ0 (where μ is the population mean IQ score for this year's entering students and μ0 is the mean IQ score for entering students from previous years)

To test these hypotheses, we would need to collect a random sample of this year's entering students and calculate their mean IQ score. We would then use statistical tests such as a t-test or a z-test to determine the likelihood of observing this sample mean if the null hypothesis were true. If the sample mean is significantly higher than the mean for entering students from previous years, we would reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis and conclude that this year's entering students do indeed appear to be smarter.

To conduct a hypothesis test for the claim that this year's entering students have higher IQ scores than previous years, we would use the following null hypothesis (H0) and alternative hypothesis (H1):

Null hypothesis (H0): There is no significant difference in the mean IQ scores of this year's entering students and those from previous years. In other words, the mean IQ for this year's students (μ) is equal to the mean IQ for previous years (μ₀).

H0: μ = μ₀

Alternative hypothesis (H1): This year's entering students have a significantly higher mean IQ than students from previous years. In this case, the mean IQ for this year's students (μ) is greater than the mean IQ for previous years (μ₀).

H1: μ > μ₀

To test these hypotheses, you would gather a random sample of this year's entering students, calculate their mean IQ, and compare it to the historical mean IQ of previous years. Then, using a suitable statistical test like a t-test, you would determine if there's enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis, thus supporting the professor's claim.

To learn more about null hypothesis, click here:

brainly.com/question/28920252

#SPJ11

Answer:

Part A:

To find the median of the data, we need to arrange the values in ascending order:

$2.99, $3.05, $3.25, $3.25, $3.43, $3.50, $3.60, $3.65

There are 8 values, so the median is the average of the 4th and 5th values, which are $3.25 and $3.43. Therefore, the median is:

Median = ($3.25 + $3.43) ÷ 2 = $3.34

To find the mode, we need to look for the value that appears most frequently in the data. Here, the value $3.25 appears twice, which is more than any other value. Therefore, the mode is:

Mode = $3.25

Part B:

To find the mean of the data, we need to add up all the values and divide by the total number of values:

Mean = ($2.99 + $3.05 + $3.25 + $3.25 + $3.43 + $3.50 + $3.60 + $3.65) ÷ 8

Mean = $3.33

Part C:

Based on the answers in Part A and Part B, we can make the following generalization about the price of milk: The median and mode of the data are both close to $3.25, while the mean is slightly higher at $3.33. This suggests that there are a few values in the data that are higher than the rest, which is pulling up the mean. Overall, the price of milk seems to be centered around $3.25, with some variation above and below that value.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

  8√23 ≈ 38.37

Step-by-step explanation:

You want the length of a chord 10 units from the center of a circle when a chord 12 units from the center has length 36 units.

The radius OA completes the right triangle OBA. The hypotenuse (OA) is found using the Pythagorean theorem:

  OA² = OB² +BA²

  OA² = 12² +18² = 468

Radius OF is the same length, so we can use the Pythagorean theorem to find FE.

  OF² = OE² +FE²

  FE² = OF² -OE² = 468 -10² = 368

  FD = 2·FE = 2√368 = 8√23

  FD ≈ 38.37

Ms. Garcia drove at a unit rate of 48 mph. The correct option is B.

We can use the information given in the problem to determine the equation of the line that represents Ms. Garcia's drive. The line passes through the points (0, 0) and (2.5, 120), so the slope of the line can be calculated as:

Slope = (change in y) / (change in x) = (120 - 0) / (2.5 - 0) = 48

This means that Ms. Garcia's drive has a constant speed of 48 miles per hour. Using this information, we can determine how far she would have driven in 1 hour by multiplying her speed by the time:

Distance = Speed x time = 48 x 1 = 48 miles

Therefore, based on the point on the graph with an x-coordinate of 1, the statement that must be true is:

B. Ms. Garcia drove at a unit rate of 48 mph.

To know more about speed follow

https://brainly.com/question/23454130

#SPJ1

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Oh i see why i got 10 down wrong.  It says divide.  I was adding.

I will edit to add.

10 down is:   x+3

Answer:1,703,520

Step-by-step explanation:

26 x 14 x 26 x 180

The test statistic for a sample with correlation coefficient r = 0.5 and sample size n = 30 is 3.06.

To test whether a correlation is significant, we need to calculate the test statistic using the correlation coefficient (r) and the sample size (n). The formula for the test statistic is:

t = r * sqrt(n-2) / sqrt(1-r^2)
Here, r is the correlation coefficient (0.5) and n is the sample size (30).
Plugging in the given values of r = 0.5 and n = 30, we get:

t = 0.5 * √((30 - 2) / (1 - 0.5^2))
t = 0.5 * √(28 / 0.75)
t = 0.5 * √(37.33)
t = 0.5 * 6.11
t ≈ 3.06

Thus, the test statistic for this sample is approximately 3.06. To determine whether the correlation is significant, we would need to compare this test statistic to a critical value from a t-distribution with n-2 degrees of freedom at the desired significance level.

To learn more about coefficients visit;

https://brainly.com/question/28975079

#SPJ11

The probability that a senator is under 70 years old given that he or she is at least 50 years old is 0.75.

To answer this question, we need to use conditional probability. Let A be the event that a senator is under 70 years old, and let B be the event that a senator is at least 50 years old. We want to find the probability of A given B, denoted as P(A|B).

Using Bayes' theorem, we have:

P(A|B) = P(B|A) * P(A) / P(B)

where P(B|A) is the probability that a senator is at least 50 years old given that they are under 70 years old (which is 1), P(A) is the probability that a senator is under 70 years old (which we do not know yet), and P(B) is the probability that a senator is at least 50 years old (which we also do not know yet).

To find P(A), we need more information. Let's assume that we know the following:

The total number of senators is 100.

The number of senators who are under 70 years old is 60.

The number of senators who are at least 50 years old is 80.

Using this information, we can calculate P(A) and P(B) as follows:

P(A) = number of senators under 70 / total number of senators = 60/100 = 0.6

P(B) = number of senators at least 50 / total number of senators = 80/100 = 0.8

Now we can plug these values into Bayes' theorem:

P(A|B) = P(B|A) * P(A) / P(B)

P(A|B) = 1 * 0.6 / 0.8

P(A|B) = 0.75

Therefore, the probability that a senator is under 70 years old given that he or she is at least 50 years old is 0.75.

Learn more about probability

brainly.com/question/11234923

#SPJ11

One way to simplify variables with many levels (or decimal places) when creating a frequency distribution is to organize the data into class intervals (option B).

By grouping the data into intervals, the frequency distribution becomes more manageable and easier to interpret. This process involves dividing the range of values into distinct intervals or categories and then counting the number of observations falling within each interval. Class intervals provide a summary of the data by grouping similar values together, reducing the complexity of individual levels or decimal places.

This simplification technique is particularly useful when dealing with large datasets or continuous variables that have numerous levels or decimal values, allowing for a clearer representation and analysis of the data.

Option B holds true.

Learn more about frequency distribution: https://brainly.com/question/27820465

#SPJ11

Based on the results, the comparison of the overall performance of the portfolios, from best to worst, is: from "Portfolio 1, Portfolio 2, Portfolio 3". Therefore, the Option C is correct.

We have,

To calculate the weighted mean of the RORs for each portfolio, we need to multiply each ROR by its corresponding investment amount, sum the products, and divide by the total investment amount:

Weighted mean ROR for Portfolio 1:

= ((3.9% x $1,250) + (1.7% x $575) + (10.6% x $895) + (-3.2% x $800) + (8.1% x $1,775)) / ($1,250 + $575 + $895 + $800 + $1,775)

= 5.12%

Weighted mean ROR for Portfolio 2:

= ((3.9% x $950) + (1.7% x $2,025) + (10.6% x $1,185) + (-3.2% x $445) + (8.1% x $625)) / ($950 + $2,025 + $1,185 + $445 + $625)

= 0.04464053537

= 4.46%

Weighted mean ROR for Portfolio 3:

= ((3.9% x $900) + (1.7% x $2,350) + (10.6% x $310) + (-3.2% x $1,600) + (8.1% x $2,780)) / ($900 + $2,350 + $310 + $1,600 + $2,780)

= 0.03550251889

= 3.55%

Based on the results, the comparison of the overall performance of the portfolios, from best to worst, is: from "Portfolio 1, Portfolio 2, Portfolio 3". Therefore, the Option C is correct.

Read more about weighted mean

brainly.com/question/24215541

#SPJ1

complete question:

Calculate the weighted mean of the RORs for each portfolio. Based on the results, which list shows a comparison of the overall performance of the portfolios, from best to worst?

A)Portfolio 1, Portfolio 3, Portfolio 2

B) Portfolio 2, Portfolio 3, Portfolio 1

C) Portfolio 1, Portfolio 2, Portfolio 3

D) Portfolio 3, Portfolio 2, Portfolio 1

Answer:

centered at x = 0.

Step-by-step explanation:

Part A: The power series for g(x) can be obtained by using the formula for a geometric series with a first term of 1 and a common ratio of (x/2). Then we have:

g(x) = 4/((x+2)(x-2)) = 4/(4*(1 + x/2)*(1 - x/2))

= 1/(1 - x/2) - 1/(1 + x/2)

We can then use the power series for 1/(1-x) to find the power series for g(x):

g(x) = 1/(1 - x/2) - 1/(1 + x/2)

= (1/2) * (1 + x/2 + (x/2)^2 + (x/2)^3 + ...) - (1/2) * (1 - x/2 + (x/2)^2 - (x/2)^3 + ...)

= x + (3/4)*x^2 + (5/8)*x^3 + (35/64)*x^4 + ...

To evaluate the infinite sum when x = 1, we can substitute x = 1 into the power series and use the formula for an infinite geometric series:

g(1) = 1 + (3/4) + (5/8) + (35/64) + ...

= 1/(1 - 1/2) - 1/(1 + 1/2)

= 2 - 2/3

= 4/3

Therefore, the infinite sum when x = 1 is 4/3.

Part B: To find an upper bound for the error of the approximation sin(0.3) ≈ 0.3 - 0.3^3/3!, we can use the formula for the remainder term in a Taylor series:

Rn(x) = f^(n+1)(c) * (x-a)^(n+1) / (n+1)!

where f(x) = sin(x), a = 0.3, n = 3, and c is some number between a and x. We want to find an upper bound for |R3(0.3)|.

Taking the fourth derivative of f(x) = sin(x), we get:

f^(4)(x) = -sin(x)

Since |sin(c)| ≤ 1 for any c, we have:

|R3(0.3)| ≤ |f^(4)(c)| * (0.3-0)^4 / 4!

≤ 1 * 0.3^4 / 24

≤ 0.000625

Therefore, an upper bound for the error is 0.000625, rounded to five decimal places.

Part C: We can find the power series for h(x) by differentiating the power series for ln(1+x) term by term. The power series for ln(1+x) is:

ln(1+x) = x - x^2/2 + x^3/3 - x^4/4 + ...

Taking the derivative, we get:

h(x) = ln(1+x)'

= 1 - x + x^2 - x^3 + ...

which is the power series for (-1)^n x^n. Therefore, the power series for h(x) is:

h(x) = ∑(-1)^n x^n

centered at x = 0.

Answer: The data set has a mode of $2.55.

The data set has a median of $2.91.

The data set has a mean that is less than the median.

Step-by-step explanation:

The value of the variable x is 13

To determine the value, we need to take note of the different properties of  a triangle.

Some properties of a triangle includes;

From the information given, we have the angles of the triangle as;

m<K = 8x - 29

m<L = 3x - 1

m<J = 6x - 11

Now, equate the angles, we have;

m<K +m<L + m<J = 180

8x - 29 + 3x - 1 + 6x - 11 = 180

collect the like terms

8x + 3x + 6x = 180 + 41

add the values

17x = 221

Make 'x' the subject

x = 13

Learn about triangles at: https://brainly.com/question/1058720

#SPJ1

The value of this continuous stream of  compound interest  after 18 years  will be [tex]\$2526[/tex].

The interest  that we earn even on interest is termed as compound interest .

We know that formulae for compound interest when compounded annually will be [tex]A = P(1 + \dfrac{r}{n})^{nt}[/tex]

Where A is the amount,

P is the principal.

r is the interest rate,

t is the time (in years).

On putting   the values in the formulae , we get:

[tex]A = 2000 ( 1 +\dfrac{1.3}{100})^{18}[/tex]

On simplifying, we get:

 A = [tex]2000\times1.263[/tex]

A = [tex]2526.24[/tex]

Rounding to the nearest integer, we get:

A =[tex]\$2526[/tex]

Therefore, the value of the continuous stream after 18 years will be [tex]\$2526.[/tex]

Learn more about compound interest here:

https://brainly.com/question/14295570

#SPJ12

The sum of the given polynomials in standard form is -x²+2x-3.

Given that, (x²-3x)+(-2x²+5x-3).

Addition of Algebraic Expressions is the process of collecting like terms and adding them. Identify and add the coefficients of like terms and sum them to find the final expression of given problems.

Here, (x²-3x)+(-2x²+5x-3)

= x²-3x-2x²+5x-3

= (x²-2x²)+(5x-3x)-3

= -x²+2x-3

Therefore, the sum of the given polynomials in standard form is -x²+2x-3.

Learn more about the addition of algebraic expressions here:

https://brainly.com/question/21443100.

#SPJ1

First, open Excel, then go for the Body Mass column. Second, In Excel, you can do this using the AVERAGE function: =AVERAGE(column_ range). Third, determine the upper limit of the interval by adding 20 to the mean. Forth, In Excel, use the COUNTIF function: =COUNTIF(column_ range, "<="&upper_ limit). Fifth, calculate the percentage of body mass.

Sixth, the percentage to 2 decimal places using Excel's ROUND function: =ROUND(percentage, 2)

To answer the question, we need to calculate the number of body masses that fall within the interval u + 20, where u is the mean body mass of the population.

First, we need to find the mean body mass. We can do this by using the AVERAGE function in Excel. Select the column with the body mass data and click on the Formulas tab. Click on the More Functions dropdown menu and select Statistical. Then, click on AVERAGE. Excel will automatically select the column with the body mass data and give you the mean value.

Next, we need to add 20 to the mean body mass to get the upper limit of the interval. We can do this by typing "=AVERAGE(B2:B152)+20" in a cell, where B2:B152 is the range of body mass data. This will give us the upper limit of the interval.

Now, we need to find the number of body masses that fall within this interval. We can do this by using the COUNTIF function in Excel. Type "=COUNTIF(B2:B152,"<="&upper limit)-COUNTIF(B2:B152,"<"&mean)" in a cell, where B2:B152 is the range of body mass data, the upper limit is the upper limit of the interval, and mean is the mean body mass. This will give us the number of body masses that fall within the interval u + 20.

To find the percentage of body masses that fall within this interval, we need to divide the number of body masses that fall within the interval by the total number of body masses and multiply by 100. We can do this by typing "= a number of body masses within interval/151*100" in a cell, where the number of body masses within the interval is the result of the COUNTIF function. This will give us the percentage of body masses that fall within the interval u + 20.

Therefore, the answer to the question is the percentage of body masses that fall within the interval u + 20, which we calculated using Excel.

Learn more about Body Mass:

brainly.com/question/14887226

#SPJ11

The requried linear function, slope, and time are y = 502x + 18272, m=502 and 21 months respectively.

We have the following data:

x y

18 27308

27 31826

Using the formula for slope, we have:

m = (31826 - 27308) / (27 - 18)

m = 502

Therefore, the slope of the linear function is 502. This means that for every month that Jeffrey owns the SUV, the odometer reading increases by an average of 502 miles.

To find the y-intercept (b) and complete the linear function, we can use one of the data points and the slope. Let's use the first data point (18, 27308):

27308 = 502(18) + b

b = 18272

Therefore, the linear function that represents the relationship between the odometer reading and time is:

y = 502x + 18272

To find how long it took for the odometer to read 28,814 miles, we can plug in 28,814 for y and solve for x:

28,814 = 502x + 18272

x = 21

Therefore, it took 21 months for the odometer to read 28,814 miles.

Learn more about linear functions here:

https://brainly.com/question/20286983

#SPJ1

In order to determine which model is preferred, we need to take into account the significance of the independent variables and the overall fit of the model. It is important to note that having a differing number of independent variables does not necessarily mean one model is better than the other.

Firstly, we need to analyze the significance of the independent variables in both models. A variable is considered significant if it has a p-value less than 0.05. If one model has more significant variables than the other, it may be preferred. However, if both models have similar levels of significance, we need to look at the overall fit of the model.

One way to assess the overall fit of the model is to look at the R-squared value. This value indicates the proportion of variation in the dependent variable that can be explained by the independent variables. A higher R-squared value indicates a better fit. However, this value should be interpreted in the context of the specific problem and should not be used as the sole determinant of model preference.

In addition, other factors such as the complexity of the model and the interpretability of the results should also be considered when deciding which model is preferred.

Therefore, the answer to the question of which model is preferred cannot be determined solely based on the fact that the two models have a differing number of independent variables. It requires a thorough analysis of the significance of the independent variables, the overall fit of the model, and other relevant factors.

Learn more about model  here:

https://brainly.com/question/28713017

#SPJ11