Answer: 10 moles/kg.
Explanation:
Given, Mass of solute = 24.2 g
Molar mass of solute = 24.2 g/mol
[tex]\text{Moles of solute =}\dfrac{\text{Mass of solute}}{\text{Molar mass of solute}}\\\\=\dfrac{24.2}{24.2}=1[/tex]
Mass of solvent = 100.0g = 0.1 kg [1 g=0.001 kg]
[tex]\text{Molality}=\dfrac{\text{Moles of solute}}{\text{kilograms of Solvent}}\\\\=\dfrac{1}{0.1}\\\\=10\ moles/kg[/tex]
Hence, the molality of the resulting solution is 10 moles/kg.
The rate at which two methyl radicals couple to form ethane is significantly faster than the rate at which two tert-butyl radicals couple. Offer two explanations for this observation.
Answer:
1. stability factor
2. steric hindrance factor
Explanation:
stability of ethane is lesser to that of two tert-butyl, so ethane will be more reactive and faster.
ethane is less hindered and more reactive, while two tert-butyl is more hindered and less reactive
Given the information below, which is more favorable energetically, the oxidation of succinate to fumarate by NAD+ or by FAD? Fumarate + 2H+ + 2e- → Succinate E°´ = 0.031 V NAD+ + 2H+ + 2e- → NADH + H+ E°´ = -0.320 FAD + 2H+ + 2e- → FADH2 E°´ = -0.219
Answer:
Oxidation by FAD
Explanation:
1. Oxidation by NAD⁺
Succinate ⇌ Fumarate + 2H⁺ + 2e⁻; E°´ = -0.031 V
NAD⁺ + 2H⁺ + 2e⁻ ⇌ NADH + H⁺; E°´ = -0.320 V
Succinate + NAD⁺ ⇌ Fumarate + NADH + H⁺; E°' = -0.351 V
2. Oxidation by FAD
Succinate ⇌ Fumarate + 2H⁺ + 2e⁻; E°´ = -0.031 V
FAD + 2H⁺ + 2e⁻ ⇌ FADH₂; E°´ = -0.219 V
Succinate + FADH₂ ⇌ Fumarate + FAD; E°' = -0.250 V
Neither reaction is energetically favourable, but FAD has a more positive half-cell potential.
FAD is the stronger oxidizing agent.
The oxidation by FAD has a more positive cell potential, so it is more favourable energetically.
If the vinegar were measured volumetrically (e.g., a pipet), what additional piece of data would be needed to complete the calculations for the experiment?
Answer:
the density if vinegar will also be needed
Explanation:
Because this is an experiment of volumetric analysis
How many valence electrons are in the electron dot structures for the elements in group 3A(13)?
Answer:
here, as we have known the elements of group 3A(13) such as aluminium , boron has three valance electron and in perodic table the elements are kept with similar proterties in same place so, their valance electron is 3.
hope it helps...
The number of valence electrons are in the electron dot structures for the elements in group 3A(13) is three.
What are Groups in the Periodic Table?The periodic table is organized into groups (vertical columns), periods (horizontal rows), and families (groups of elements that are similar). Elements in the same group have the same number of valence electrons.
Groups are the columns of the periodic table, and periods are the rows. There are 18 groups, and there are 7 periods plus the lanthanides and actinides.
There are two different numbering systems that are commonly used to designate groups, and you should be familiar with both.
The traditional system used in the United States involves the use of the letters A and B. The first two groups are 1A and 2A, while the last six groups are 3A through 8A. The middle groups use B in their titles.
Therefore, The number of valence electrons are in the electron dot structures for the elements in group 3A(13) is three.
Learn more about Groups in the periodic table, here:
https://brainly.com/question/30858972
#SPJ3
Erbium metal (Er) can be prepared by reacting erbium(III) fluoride with magnesium; the other product is magnesium fluoride. Write and balance the equation.
Answer:
2ErF3 + 3Mg → 2Er + 3MgF2
Explanation:
Erbium metal is a member of the lanthaniod series. It reacts with halogens directly to yield erbium III halides such as erbium III chloride, Erbium III fluoride etc.
Erbium metal (Er) can be prepared by reacting erbium(III) fluoride with magnesium; the products are erbium metal and magnesium fluoride. This is a normal redox process in which the Erbium metal is reduced while the magnesium is oxidized. The balanced reaction equation of this process is; 2ErF3 + 3Mg → 2Er + 3MgF2