Answer:
Court does not have power to force compliance -Court does not have the ultimate power to change the law.
Explanation:
why is Trusteeship Council inactive
Answer:
Over time, as trust territories attained independence, the size and workload of the Trusteeship Council was reduced. With the independence of Palau, formerly part of the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, in 1994, there presently are no trust territories, leaving the Trusteeship Council without responsibilities.
Describe the event called the "Little Rock Nine."
Answer:
The Little Rock Nine became an integral part of the fight for equal opportunity in American education when they dared to challenge public school segregation by enrolling at the all-white Central High School in 1957. Their appearance and award are part of the Centennial Celebration of Women at Marquette.
Explanation:
The term insanity is:
A. a legal term
B. in the DSM.
C. used for anyone who has a mental disorder.
D. used for someone with schizophrenia.
Answer: a legal term
Explanation: took the test
Anybody who makes sense is sane, and (A) the legal name for insanity is "insanity."
What do we mean by the word insanity?If someone is sensible, they are sane.
By contrast to noncompos mentis, or insanity, which refers to a tormented conscience, the phrase compos mentis has exclusively come to denote having control of one's thoughts in modern society.
Insanity is a recognized legal term.
For instance, someone exhibiting insanity may stab someone else while having a sleepwalking episode or attempt to kill the president in order to impress a well-known actress.
A criminal defendant can use the legal defense of criminal insanity to prevent their conviction for a crime.
Therefore, anybody who makes sense is sane, and (A) the legal name for insanity is "insanity."
Know more about the insanity here:
https://brainly.com/question/30479230
#SPJ1
Use the information below to answer the question that follows. Some Features of the Articles of Confederation Each state had one vote Laws required approval from 9 of the 13 states to pass Congress lacked the power to tax citizens No national court system or national executive Amendments required approval by all 13 states What was one argument that critics could make about the Articles of Confederation
Answer: C. The national government had little power to get states to cooperate.
Explanation:
The Articles of Confederation made the Federal Government notoriously weak with the logic being that a strong central government might have become tyrannical overtime.
The Federal Government was totally reliant on the States as it was the states that raised taxes and gave what they wanted to the Federal Government. With such power vested with them, they States did not even feel the need to cooperate sometimes.
Summarize the Court’s decision in Marbury v. Madison. As a result of this case, what important legal principle was established?/
Answer:
In Marbury v. Madison (1803) the Supreme Court announced for the first time the principle that a court may declare an act of Congress void if it is inconsistent with the Constitution. William Marbury had been appointed a justice of the peace for the District of Columbia in the final hours of the Adams administration. The U.S. Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison (1803) established the principle of judicial review—the power of the federal courts to declare legislative and executive acts unconstitutional. The unanimous opinion was written by Chief Justice John Marshall.
Which of the following makes a true statement about U.S. foreign policy?
• It is the secretary of state who makes all the important decisions related to foreign policy.
• One of its goals is to encourage other countries to make their governments more democratic.
•Congress believes foreign policy is more important than domestic policy and works on it first.
• The president usually tries to maintain isolation by sending ambassadors to other countries.
Answer: B: One of its goals is to encourage other countries to make their governments more democratic.
Explanation:
8. Define Voltage and give an example in real life.
Answer:
Example of voltage from real life is a water tank with a hose extending from the bottom. Water in the tank represents stored charge. It takes work to fill the tank with water. This creates a store of water.
Explanation:
Write the five characteristics of a good government?
Answer:
Participation.
Consensus oriented.
Accountability.
Transparency.
Responsive.
Answer:
Explanation:What Constitutes Good Governance
Participation.
Consensus oriented.
Accountability.
Effective and efficient.
Equitable and inclusive.
Follows the rule of law
Hope it Helps and Give a Thanks if So.
You are an eyewitness to a crime: A man has robbed a bank, but instead of keeping the money for himself, he donates it to a poor orphanage that can now afford to feed, clothe and care for its children. You know who committed the crime. If you go to the authorities with the information, there's a good chance the money will be returned to the bank, leaving a lot of kids in need. What do you do? Apply the concept of 'Ethical Decision Making Process' to act in the above situation by applying four steps.
Answer:
The following steps in Ethical Decision Making Process would be adopted:
1. State the problem, and determine facts.
The problem here is stealing to finance the poor in the society (orphanage). The available facts are: A man robbed a bank and donates the money to the poor, the motives behind this is unknown since he didn't steal for his purse. It is not good to make assumptions so as to arrive at a good decision.
2. Check the ethical issues to be solved in the problem.
The ethical issue is stealing which conflicts with a society's moral principles. But, the positive is giving to the poor which is good the source of the money is however illegal.
3. Take a closer look at those affected.
The robber, the bank, poor orphanage, the society as a whole would be affected by my decisions.
4. Identify all decisions that you could take, their consequences, and make a decision.
Any decision I take would affect the robber who might be jailed and the orphans could lose the money or the Bank would remain affected, some bankers might be affected depending on the law and how the crime happened, and I would lose my good ethical values and breach the law if I should remain silent.
I would report to the authorities this would be a good decision because:
i. The bank would be saved.
ii. It could increase greater ethical values in the society.
iii. That's the right thing to do because irrespective of the good motive of a crime that doesn't remove the crime committed.
iv. The poor orphanage could receive financial support from people in the society.
Explanation:
Ethical decision-making gives one the freedom of choosing the right ethical principles among several other ethical principles. The goal is to make one do the right thing, stand for the right thing regardless of the risk, and to be consistent in applying great moral values that are consistent with good citizenship.
The 'Ethical Decision Making Process' steps to apply in the situation mentioned above include:
1. State the problem, and determine facts.
2. Check the ethical issues to be solved in the problem.
3. Take a closer look at those affected.
4. Identify all decisions that you could take and their consequences.
5. Apply the Ethical principles to the options.
6. Make a decision.