If parallelogram EFGH is a rhombus, calculate the area of rhombus EFGH if EG=1.7 and FH=1.1, if there is not enough information say there is not enough info. Picture of rhombus:

Answer: 1. [tex]-\dfrac{5}{6}[/tex]  2. [tex]-\dfrac{1}{3}[/tex] . 3. [tex]-3[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Formula: Slope[tex]=\dfrac{y_2-y_1}{x_2-x_1}[/tex]

1. (-2,2) (3,-3)

Slope [tex]=\dfrac{-3-2}{3-(-2)}[/tex]

[tex]=\dfrac{-5}{3+2}\\\\=\dfrac{-5}{6}[/tex]

Hence, slope of line passing through  (-2,2) (3,-3) is [tex]-\dfrac{5}{6}[/tex] .

2. (-5,1) (4,-2)

Slope [tex]=\dfrac{-2-1}{4-(-5)}[/tex]

[tex]=\dfrac{-3}{4+5}\\\\=\dfrac{-3}{9}\\\\=-\dfrac{1}{3}[/tex]

Hence, slope of line passing through  (-2,2) and (3,-3) is [tex]-\dfrac{1}{3}[/tex] .

3. (-1,5) (2,-4)

Slope [tex]=\dfrac{-4-5}{2-(-1)}[/tex]

[tex]=\dfrac{-9}{2+1}\\\\=\dfrac{-9}{3}\\\\=-3[/tex]

Hence, slope of line passing through (-1,5) and (2,-4) is -3.

Sam's weight to the nearest stone is equal to 8.0 stone.

Given the following data:

To determine Sam's weight to the nearest stone:

In this exercise, you're required to determine Sam's weight to the nearest stone. Thus, we would convert his weight in kilograms to pounds and lastly to stone as follows:

Conversion:

1 kg = 2.2 pounds.

51 kg = [tex]51 \times 2.2[/tex] = 112.2 pounds.

Next, we would convert the value in pounds to stone:

14 pounds = 1 stone.

112.2 pounds = X stone.

Cross-multiplying, we have:

[tex]14X = 112.2\\\\X=\frac{112.2}{14}[/tex]

X = 8.01 ≈ 8.0 stone.

Read more on weight here: brainly.com/question/13833323

Answer:

28

Step-by-step explanation:

Let x be the missing segment

We will use the proportionality property to find x

24/16 = 42/x

Simplify 24/16

24/16= (4×6)/(4×4)= 4/6 = 3/2

So 3/2 = 42/x

3x = 42×2

3x = 84

x = 84/3

x= 28

Answer:

A sample of at least 541 is needed if we wish to be 98% confident that our sample mean will be within 4 hours of the true mean.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that an electrical firm manufactures light bulbs that have a length of life that is approximately normally distributed with a standard deviation of 40 hours.

We have to find a sample such that we are 98% confident that our sample mean will be within 4 hours of the true mean.

As we know that the Margin of error formula is given by;

The margin of error =  [tex]Z_(_\frac{\alpha}{2}_) \times \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n} }[/tex]

where, [tex]\sigma[/tex] = standard deviation = 40 hours

            n = sample size

            [tex]\alpha[/tex] = level of significance = 1 - 0.98 = 0.02 or 2%

Now, the critical value of z at ([tex]\frac{0.02}{2}[/tex] = 1%) level of significance n the z table is given as 2.3263.

So, the margin of error =  [tex]Z_(_\frac{\alpha}{2}_) \times \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n} }[/tex]

                 [tex]4=2.3263 \times \frac{40}{\sqrt{n} }[/tex]

                 [tex]\sqrt{n}= \frac{40 \times 2.3263}{ 4}[/tex]

                  [tex]\sqrt{n}=23.26[/tex]

                   n = [tex]23.26^{2}[/tex] = 541.03 ≈ 541

Hence, a sample of at least 541 is needed if we wish to be 98% confident that our sample mean will be within 4 hours of the true mean.

Answer:

61% i think

Step-by-step explanation:

if you have 39% and it 10 out of a 100 well you have a 39/100 and then n would be 61/100 so 61%

0.39  is the value of n for the video games on their smartphones. Thus option A is correct.

The mathematical discipline known as probability specializes in determining the possibility of an event occurring. Probability, which expresses the probability of a risk, is calculated by dividing the total possible combinations by the frequency of favorable events. Composite reliabilities vary from 0 to 1, with 1 representing certainty and 0 representing hesitation.

In a binomial distribution, p stands for the success probability. It refers to the likelihood that a certain number of experiments will result in favorable results. For all binomial attempts, the probability of winning stays constant.

This suggests that there will be a distribution of 39/100. The result after the calculation will be 0.39. Therefore, option A is the correct option.

Learn more about probability, Here:

https://brainly.com/question/11234923

#SPJ2

The question is incomplete, the complete question will be :

A survey found that  39 % of all gamers play video games on their smartphones. Ten frequent gamers are randomly selected. The random variable represents the number of frequent games who play video games on their smartphones. What is the value of n ?

A) 0.39

B) 0.10

C) 10

D) x

Answer:

~0.3158

Step-by-step explanation:

Number of even numbers in the range of 1 - 38 is 38/2 = 19

=> P(E) = 19/38 = 1/2

Having: 38 = 3 x 12 + 2, then the number of numbers that is a multiple of 3 in the range of 1 - 38 is 12

=> P(M) = 12/38 = 6/19

Having: 38 = 6 x 6 + 2, then the number of numbers that is a multiple of 6 (or multiple of 2 and 3) is 6

=> P(E and M) = 6/38 = 3/19

Applying the conditional probability formula:

P(M|E) = P(E and M)/P(E) = (3/19)/(1/2) = 6/19 = ~0.3158

Answer:

Following are the answer to this question:

Step-by-step explanation:

The principle vale of Arg(3)

[tex]Arg(3)=-\pi+\tan^{-1} (\frac{|Y|}{|x|})[/tex]

The principle value of the [tex]\logi= \log(0+i)\ \ \ \ \ _{where} \ \ \ x=0 \ \ y=1> 0[/tex]

So, the principle value:

a)

[tex]\to \log(i)=\log |i|+i Arg(i)\\\\[/tex]

             [tex]=\log \sqrt{0+1}+i \tan^{-1}(\frac{1}{0})\\\=\log 1 +i \tan^{-1}(\infty)\\\=0+i\frac{\pi}{2}\\\=i\frac{\pi}{2}[/tex]

b)

[tex]\to \log(-i)= \log(0-i ) \ \ \ x=0 \ \ \ y= -1<0\\[/tex]

Principle value:

[tex]\to \log(-i)= \log|-i|+iArg(-i) \\\\[/tex]

                 [tex]=\log \sqrt{0+1}+i(-\pi+\tan^{-1}(\infty))\\\\=\log1 + i(-\pi+\frac{\pi}{2})\\\\=-i\frac{\pi}{2}[/tex]

c)

[tex]\to \log(-1+i) \ \ \ \ x=-1, _{and} y=1 \ \ \ x<0 and y>0[/tex]

The principle value:

[tex]\to \log(-1+i)=\log |-1+i| + i Arg(-1+i)[/tex]

                     [tex]=\log \sqrt{1+1}+i(\pi+\tan^{-1}(\frac{1}{1}))\\\\=\log \sqrt{2} + i(\pi-\tan^{-1}\frac{\pi}{4})\\\\=\log \sqrt{2} + i\tan^{-1}\frac{3\pi}{4}\\\\[/tex]

d)

[tex]\to i^i=w\\\\w=e^{i\log i}[/tex]

The principle value:

[tex]\to \log i=i\frac{\pi}{2}\\\\\to w=e^{i(i \frac{\pi}{2})}\\\\=e^{-\frac{\pi}{2}}[/tex]

e)

[tex]\to (-i)^i\\\to w=(-i)^i\\\\w=e^{i \log (-i)}[/tex]

In this we calculate the principle value from b:

so, the final value is [tex]e^{\frac{\pi}{2}}[/tex]

f)

[tex]\to -1^i\\\\\to w=e^{i log(-1)}\\\\\ principle \ value: \\\\\to \log(-1)= \log |-1|+iArg(-i)[/tex]

                [tex]=\log \sqrt{1} + i(\pi-\tan^{-1}\frac{0}{-1})\\\\=\log \sqrt{1} + i(\pi-0)\\\\=\log \sqrt{1} + i\pi\\\\=0+i\pi\\=i\pi[/tex]

and the principle value of w is = [tex]e^{\pi}[/tex]

g)

[tex]\to -1^{-i}\\\\\to w=e^(-i \log (-1))\\\\[/tex]

from the point f the principle value is:

[tex]\to \log(-1)= i\pi\\\to w= e^{-i(i\pi)}\\\\\to w=e^{\pi}[/tex]

h)

[tex]\to \log(-1-i)\\\\\ Here x=-1 ,<0 \ \ y=-1<0\\\\ \ principle \ value \ is:\\\\ \to \log(-1-i)=\log\sqrt{1+1}+i(-\pi+\tan^{-1}(1))[/tex]

                    [tex]=\log\sqrt{2}+i(-\pi+\frac{\pi}{4})\\\\=\log\sqrt{2}+i(-\frac{3\pi}{4})\\\\=\log\sqrt{2}-i\frac{3\pi}{4})\\[/tex]

The lines of the inequalities are parallel, and the system of inequalities do not have any solution.

The system of inequalities are  given as:

The inequality y ≥ 2x + 1 has the following characteristics:

The inequality y ≤ 2x – 2 has the following characteristics:

See attachment for the graphs of the system of inequalities

Read more about system of inequalities at:

https://brainly.com/question/9774970

Answer:

√3/2

Explanation:

The directional derivative at the given point is gotten using the formula;

∇f(x,y)•u where u is the unit vector in that direction.

∇f(x,y) = f/x i + f/y j

Given the function f(x, y) = y cos(xy),

f/x = -y²sin(xy) and

f/y = -xysin(xy)+cos(xy)

∇f(x,y) = -y²sin(xy) i + (cos(xy)-xysin(xy)) j

∇f(x,y) at (0,1) will give;

∇f(0,1) = -0sin0 i + cos0j

∇f(0,1) = 0i+j

The unit vector in the direction of angle θ is given as u = cosθ i + sinθ j

u = cos(π/3)i+ sin(π/3)j

u = 1/2 i + √3/2 j

Taking the dot product of both vectors;

∇f(x,y)•u = (0i+j)•(1/2 i + √3/2 j)

Note that i.i = j.j = 1 and i.j = 0

∇f(x,y)•u = 0 + √3/2

∇f(x,y)•u = √3/2

The directional derivative of [tex]f[/tex] at the given point in the direction indicated is [tex]\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}[/tex].

The directional derivative is represented by the following formula:

[tex]\nabla_{\vec v} f = \nabla f(x_{o},y_{o}) \cdot \vec v[/tex]    (1)

Where:

The gradient of [tex]f[/tex] is calculated below:

[tex]\nabla f (x_{o},y_{o}) = \left[\begin{array}{cc}\frac{\partial f}{\partial x} (x_{o}, y_{o}) \\\frac{\partial f}{\partial y} (x_{o}, y_{o})\end{array}\right][/tex] (2)

Where [tex]\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}[/tex] and [tex]\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}[/tex] are the partial derivatives with respect to [tex]x[/tex] and [tex]y[/tex], respectively.

If we know that [tex](x_{o}, y_{o}) = (0, 1)[/tex], then the gradient is:

[tex]\nabla f(x_{o}, y_{o}) = \left[\begin{array}{cc}-y^{2}\cdot \sin xy\\\cos xy -x\cdot y\cdot \sin xy\end{array}\right][/tex]

[tex]\nabla f (x_{o}, y_{o}) = \left[\begin{array}{cc}-1^{2}\cdot \sin 0\\\cos 0-0\cdot 1\cdot \sin 0\end{array}\right][/tex]

[tex]\nabla f (x_{o}, y_{o}) = \left[\begin{array}{cc}0\\1\end{array}\right][/tex]

If we know that [tex]\vec v = \cos \frac{\pi}{3}\,\hat{i} + \sin \frac{\pi}{3} \,\hat{j}[/tex], then the directional derivative is:

[tex]\Delta_{\vec v} f = \left[\begin{array}{cc}0\\1\end{array}\right]\cdot \left[\begin{array}{cc}\cos \frac{\pi}{3} \\\sin \frac{\pi}{3} \end{array}\right][/tex]

[tex]\nabla_{\vec v} f = (0)\cdot \cos \frac{\pi}{3} + (1)\cdot \sin \frac{\pi}{3}[/tex]

[tex]\nabla_{\vec v} f = \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}[/tex]

The directional derivative of [tex]f[/tex] at the given point in the direction indicated is [tex]\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}[/tex]. [tex]\blacksquare[/tex]

To learn more on directional derivatives, we kindly invite to check this verified question: https://brainly.com/question/9964491

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The null hypothesis is described as the default hypothesis while the alternative hypothesis us always tested against this null ie the opposite of the null hypothesis.

In this case study, Let the proportion of houses that have home security be p

Thus, the null hypothesis is proportion of houses that have home security is 45% : p = 45%

The alternative hypothesis is proportion of houses that have home security is different than 45%: p =/ 45%

Answer:

In Table C, y vary inversely with x.

1×18 = 18

2×9 = 18

3×6 = 18

18 = 18 = 18

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given four tables and asked to find out in which table y vary inversely with x.

We know that an inverse relation has a form given by

y = k/x

xy = k

where k must be a constant

Table A:

x     |      y

1     |      3

2     |     9

3     |    27

1×3 = 3

2×9 = 18

3×27 = 81

3 ≠ 18 ≠ 81

Hence y does not vary inversely with x.

Table B:

x     |      y

1     |     -5

2     |     5

3     |    15

1×-5 = -5

2×5 = 10

3×15 = 45

-5 ≠ 10 ≠ 45

Hence y does not vary inversely with x.

Table C:

x     |      y

1     |      18

2     |     9

3     |     6

1×18 = 18

2×9 = 18

3×6 = 18

18 = 18 = 18

Hence y vary inversely with x.

Table D:

x     |      y

1     |      4

2     |     8

3     |    12

1×4 = 4

2×8 = 16

3×12 = 36

4 ≠ 16 ≠ 36

Hence y does not vary inversely with x.

Answer: 14

Step-by-step explanation:

12/4 times 3 +5

= 3 times 3 + 5

= 9 + 5

= 14

Answer:

The answer is below

Step-by-step explanation:

A sugar refinery has three processing plants, all receiving raw sugar in bulk. The amount of raw sugar (in tons) that one plant can process in one day can be modelled using an exponential distribution with mean of 4 tons for each of three plants. If each plant operates independently,a.Find the probability that any given plant processes more than 5 tons of raw sugar on a given day.b.Find the probability that exactly two of the three plants process more than 5 tons of raw sugar on a given day.c.How much raw sugar should be stocked for the plant each day so that the chance of running out of the raw sugar is only 0.05?

Answer: The mean (μ) of the plants is 4 tons. The probability density function of an exponential distribution is given by:

[tex]f(x)=\lambda e^{-\lambda x}\\But\ \lambda= 1/\mu=1/4 = 0.25\\Therefore:\\f(x)=0.25e^{-0.25x}\\[/tex]

a) P(x > 5) = [tex]\int\limits^\infty_5 {f(x)} \, dx =\int\limits^\infty_5 {0.25e^{-0.25x}} \, dx =-e^{-0.25x}|^\infty_5=e^{-1.25}=0.2865[/tex]

b) Probability that exactly two of the three plants process more than 5 tons of raw sugar on a given day can be solved when considered as a binomial.

That is P(2 of the three plant use more than five tons) = C(3,2) × [P(x > 5)]² × (1-P(x > 5)) = 3(0.2865²)(1-0.2865) = 0.1757

c) Let b be the amount of raw sugar should be stocked for the plant each day.

P(x > a) = [tex]\int\limits^\infty_a {f(x)} \, dx =\int\limits^\infty_a {0.25e^{-0.25x}} \, dx =-e^{-0.25x}|^\infty_a=e^{-0.25a}[/tex]

But P(x > a) = 0.05

Therefore:

[tex]e^{-0.25a}=0.05\\ln[e^{-0.25a}]=ln(0.05)\\-0.25a=-2.9957\\a=11.98[/tex]

a  ≅ 12

Complete Question:

Which statement about the following equation is true?

[tex]2x^2-9x+2 = -1[/tex]

A) The discriminant is less than 0, so there are two real roots

B) The discriminant is less than 0, so there are two complex roots

C) The discriminant is greater than 0, so there are two real roots

D) The discriminant is greater than 0, so there are two complex roots

Answer:

C) The discriminant is greater than 0, so there are two real roots

Step-by-step explanation:

The given equation is [tex]2x^2-9x+2 = -1[/tex] which by simplification becomes

[tex]2x^2 - 9x + 3 = 0[/tex]

For a quadratic equation of the form [tex]ax^2 + bx + c = 0[/tex], the discriminant is given by the equation, [tex]D = b^2 - 4ac[/tex]

If the discriminant D is greater than 0, the roots are real and different

If the discriminant D is equal to 0, the roots are real and equal

If the discriminant D is less than 0, the roots are imaginary

For the quadratic equation under consideration, a = 2, b = -9, c = 3

Let us calculate the discriminant D

D = (-9)² - 4(2)(3)

D = 81 - 24

D = 57

Since the Discriminant D is greater than 0, the roots are real and different.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

C) The discriminant is greater than 0, so there are two real roots

Answer:

810.66 ft²

Step-by-step explanation:

Short answer:

Shaded region:

Answer: 810.66 ft²

I agree.

Answer:

z(c)  = - 1,64

We reject the null hypothesis

Step-by-step explanation:

We need to solve a proportion test ( one tail-test ) left test

Normal distribution

p₀ = 63 %

proportion size  p = 51 %

sample size  n = 114

At 5% level of significance   α = 0,05, and with this value we find in z- table z score of z(c) = 1,64  ( critical value )

Test of proportion:

H₀     Null Hypothesis                        p = p₀

Hₐ    Alternate Hypothesis                p < p₀

We now compute z(s) as:

z(s) =  ( p - p₀ ) / √ p₀q₀/n

z(s) =( 0,51 - 0,63) / √0,63*0,37/114

z(s) =  - 0,12 / 0,045

z(s) = - 2,66

We compare z(s) and z(c)

z(s) < z(c)      - 2,66 < -1,64

Therefore as z(s) < z(c)  z(s) is in the rejection zone we reject the null hypothesis

Answer:

perimeter = 56 in

area = 192 sq. in.

Step-by-step explanation:

area of a triangle = 0.5 * b * h

b = 12

h = 8

At = (0.5 * 12 * 8)  = 48

Area of a square

As = 12 * 12 = 144

total area = At + As

total area = 48 + 144

total area = 192 sq. in.

perimeter = add all sides

12 + 12 + 12 + 10 + 10 = 56 in

hope it helps

Complete question is;

Scores turned in by an amateur golfer at the Bonita Fairways Golf Course in Bonita Springs, Florida, during 2005 and 2006 are as follows:

2005 Season: 73 77 78 76 74 72 74 76

2006 Season: 70 69 74 76 84 79 70 78

​A) Calculate the mean (to the nearest whole number) and the standard deviation (to decimals) of the golfer's scores, for both years.

B) What is the primary difference in performance between 2005 and 2006? What improvement,

if any, can be seen in the 2006 scores?

Answer:

A) 2006 mean = 75

2005 mean = 75

2006 standard deviation = 5.2644

2005 standard deviation = 2.0702

B)The primary difference is that variation is higher in the 2006 season than the 2005 season.

Step-by-step explanation:

A) Mean is the sum of all scores divided by the number of scores.

Thus;

μ_2005 = (73 + 77 + 78 + 76 + 74 + 72 +74 + 76)/8 = 75

Similarly;

μ_2006 = (70 + 69 + 74 + 76 + 84 + 79 + 70 + 78)/8 = 75

Now, variance is calculated by the sum of the square of mean deviations divided by (n - 1)

Thus;

2005 Variance = ((73-75)² + (77-75)² + (78-75)² + (76-75)² + (74-75)² + (72-75)² + (74-75)² + (76-75)²)/(8-1) = 4.2857

2006 Variance = ((70-75)² + (69-75)² + (74-75)² + (76-75)² + (84-75)² + (79-75)² + (70-75)² + (78-75)²)/(8 - 1) = 27.7143

Now, standard deviation is the square root of variance.

Thus;

2005 standard deviation = √4.2857 = 2.0702

2006 standard deviation = √27.7143 = 5.2644

B) The primary difference is that variation is higher in the 2006 season than the 2005 season.

Also,

Answer:

8lb of the cheaper Candy

17.5lb of the expensive candy

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the cheaper candy be x

let the costly candy be y

X+y = 25.5....equation one

2.2x +7.3y = 25.5(5.7)

2.2x +7.3y = 145.35.....equation two

X+y = 25.5

2.2x +7.3y = 145.35

Solving simultaneously

X= 25.5-y

Substituting value of X into equation two

2.2(25.5-y) + 7.3y = 145.35

56.1 -2.2y +7.3y = 145.35

5.1y = 145.35-56.1

5.1y = 89.25

Y= 89.25/5.1

Y= 17.5

X= 25.5-y

X= 25.5-17.5

X= 8

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the measure of third angle be X

The sum of interior angle of triangle = X

Let's create an equation

[tex]x + 32 + 90 = 180[/tex]

Add the numbers

[tex]x + 122 = 180[/tex]

Move constant to R.H.S and change its sign

[tex]x = 180 - 122[/tex]

Subtract the numbers

[tex]x = 58[/tex] °

Hope this helps...

Best regards!!

Answer:

49.923 mph

Step-by-step explanation:

we know that the car traveled 133 miles in h hours at an average speed of x mph.

That is, xh = 133.

We can also write this in terms of hours driven: h = 133/x.

If x was 30 mph faster, then h would be one hour less.

That is, (x + 30)(h - 1) = 133, or h - 1 = 133/(x + 30).

We can rewrite the latter equation as h = 133/(x + 30) + 1

We can then make a system of equations using the formulas in terms of h to find x:

h = 133/x = 133/(x + 30) + 1

133/x = 133/(x + 30) + (x + 30)/(x + 30)

133/x = (133 + x + 30)/(x + 30)

133 = x*(133 + x + 30)/(x + 30)

133*(x + 30) =  x*(133 + x + 30)

133x + 3990 = 133x + x^2 + 30x

3990 = x^2 + 30x

x^2 + 30x - 3990 = 0

Using the quadratic formula:

x = [-b ± √(b^2 - 4ac)]/2a  

= [-30 ± √(30^2 - 4*1*(-3990))]/2(1)  

= [-30 ± √(900 + 15,960)]/2

= [-30 ± √(16,860)]/2

= [-30 ± 129.846]/2

= 99.846/2  -----------  x is miles per hour, and a negative value of x is neglected, so we'll use the positive value only)

= 49.923

Check if the answer is correct:

h = 133/49.923 = 2.664, so the car took 2.664 hours to drive 133 miles at an average speed of 49.923 mph.

If the car went 30 mph faster on average, then h = 133/(49.923 + 30) = 133/79.923 = 1.664, and 2.664 - 1 = 1.664.

Thus, we have confirmed that a car driving 133 miles at about 49.923 mph would have arrive precisely one hour earlier by going 30 mph faster

Answer:

1.9375.

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve this, we must use PEMDAS.

The first things we take care of are parentheses and exponents.

Since there are no parentheses, we do exponents.

4^-1+8^-1÷1/2/3^3​

= [tex]\frac{1}{4} +\frac{1}{8} / 1/ 2/ 27[/tex]

= 1/4 + (1/8) / 1 * (27 / 2)

= 1/4 + (27 / 8) / 2

= 1/4 + (27 / 8) * (1 / 2)

= 1/4 + (27 / 16)

= 4 / 16 + 27 / 16

= 31 / 16

= 1.9375.

Hope this helps!

Answer: 0.9964

Step-by-step explanation:

Consider,

P (disk failure) = 0.06

q = 0.06

p = 1- q

p = 1- 0.06,

p = 0.94

Step 2

Whereas p represents the probability that a disk does not fail. (i.e. working entire year).

a)

Step 3

a)

n = 2,

let x be a random variable for number...

Continuation in the attached document

Answer:

The probability that all three people on the subcommittee are men

= 20%

Step-by-step explanation:

Number of members in the committee = 15

= 8 men + 7 women

The probability of selecting a man in the committee

= 8/15

= 53%

The probability of selecting three men from eight men

= 3/8

= 37.5%

The probability that all three people on the subcommittee are men

= probability of selecting a man multiplied by the probability of selecting three men from eight men

= 53% x 37.5%

= 19.875%

= 20% approx.

This is the same as:

The probability of selecting 3 men from the 15 member-committee

= 3/15

= 20%

Answer:

Look for perpendicular lines or corresponding angles or alternate interior angles.

Step-by-step explanation:

When you want to show that a quadrilateral is a parallelogram you need to show that the oposite sides are parallel. In order to show that two segments are parallel there are various theorems and definitions you can use.

1 -  Remember that two lines perpendicular to the same segment are parallel.

2 - When two lines are cut by a secant and their alternate interior angles are congruent, then the resulting lines are parallel, I will attach a drawing to illustrate what I am saying.

3 - When two lines are cut by a secant and their CORRESPONDING angles are congruent, then the resulting lines are parallel, I will also attach a drawing to illustrate what I am saying.

Answer:

If the correlation coefficient is 1, then the slope must be 1 as well.

Step-by-step explanation:

Coefficient of correlation is used in statistics to determine the relationship between two variables. Correlation coefficient and slope always have same sign. It measures the strength of linear relation between two variables. The values of correlation coefficient ranges between 0 to 1. where 0 determines that there is no relationship between two variables.

Answer:

The answer is 5th angle = [tex]\bold{42^\circ}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that pizza is divided into six unequal slices.

Largest slice has an angle of [tex]90^\circ[/tex].

He eats the pizza from largest to smallest.

Let the difference in angles in each slice = [tex]d^\circ[/tex]

1st angle = [tex]90^\circ[/tex]

2nd angle = 90-d

3rd angle = 90-d-d = 90 - 2d

4th angle = 90-2d-d = 90 - 3d

5th angle = 90-3d-d = 90 - 4d

6th angle = 90-4d -d = 90 - 5d

We know that the sum of all the angles will be equal to [tex]360^\circ[/tex] (The sum of all the angles subtended at the center).

i.e.

[tex]90+90-d+90-2d+90-3d+90-4d+90-5d=360\\\Rightarrow 540 - 15d = 360\\\Rightarrow 15d = 540 -360\\\Rightarrow 15d = 180\\\Rightarrow d = 12^\circ[/tex]

So, the angles will be:

1st angle = [tex]90^\circ[/tex]

2nd angle = 90- 12 = 78

3rd angle = 78-12 = 66

4th angle = 66-12 = 54

5th angle = 54-12 = 42

6th angle = 42 -12 = 30

So, the answer is 5th angle = [tex]\bold{42^\circ}[/tex]

Answer: 9.52cm

Step-by-step explanation:

The data we have is:

Radius = 7cm

Angle of the arc = 1.36 rads

Now, the perimeter of a full circle is equal to:

P = 2*pi*r

Where 2*pi = 6.28 rads

Then the length of an arc of angle A is

P = A*r

then in our case:

P = 1.36*7cm = 9.52cm

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The happiest used in a test in statistics are the null and the alternative hypothesis. The null hypothesis is usually the default statement while the alternative hypothesis is thevopposite of the null hypothesis.

In this case study, the null hypothesis is u1 = u2: the average mean time it takes to accelerate to 30 miles per hour for car 1 is the same as that for car 2.

The alternative hypothesis is u1 > u2: the mean time it takes to accelerate to 30 miles per hour is greater than that for car 2 thus car 1 is slower to accelerate as it takes more time.

Answer:

a=6, b=5.5

Step-by-step explanation:

By looking at the sides of the triangles it can easily be seen that some of the sides match up. Side b is similar to the side of 11 and same with side a and the side of 3. Since one side is 16 and the other side on the smaller triangle is 8, the bigger triangle is twice as large than the smaller one. So 3 x 2 = 6 and 11 / 2 = 5.5