Identify the causes and effects of the War of 1812.

Answer:

Whatever forces move the plastic around will also move the cleanup systems around making them very much like plastic magnets.

Explanation:

Answer:

The watershed was basined.

Explanation:

if basic means an area of land that is drained by rivers. Then watershed works because a watershed is an area that was drained form a body of water live rivers lakes ect.

Answer:

The US of America was made on July 4, 1776, with the Affirmation of Freedom of 13 English settlements in North America. The association was formalized in the Articles of Confederation, which came into power on Walk 1, 1781.

Answer:

False

Explanation:

The best way is to check the Nutrition Facts and the labels on the product. You aren't able to know the amount of sugar in something by tasting it, which is why these numbers on the back exist. They help us know what the product is made of and monitor our own intake.

This is all I know sorry if i dont

answer your question

Explanation:

How does global travel contribute to the spread of disease?

Summary and Conclusions. Global travel and the evolution of microbes will continue. New infections will continue to emerge, and known infections will change in distribution, severity and frequency. Travel will continue to be a potent factor in disease emergence.

Restoration is easy, if one only has the power and the will; creation is not easy, even if one has both. Restoration is reversion to the known, the certain; creation is a venture into the unknown and the uncertain, and is highly conducive to divergencies of thought, to division in the ranks; while an army of restoration knows precisely what it wishes to do, namely, to set up again the old landmarks—and that, too, as speedily as possible—to bring back the good old times, to renew the broken connection with the past. Whether we like it or not, ours is the more difficult task. If the five Great Powers of 1919 were anxious to restore the map of 1914, they could not do it; whereas the five Great Powers of 1814 found it easy to reverse the cartographical innovations of Napoleon Bonaparte. The work of Lenin and Trotzky will not be so easily undone. Fortunately for the peace of his spirit, Napoleon does not know that. Napoleon, Lenin, and Trotzky—an incongruous trio of actors on the Russian stage! Napoleon, a Frenchman, bent upon conquering Russia, was the direct means of heightening the influence and increasing the territory of Russia, as all the world saw in 1815. Lenin and Trotzky, Russians, have not only coöperated zealously in destroying the prestige of their country: they have consented and contributed, to the best of their ability, to the colossal dismemberment of Russia and its utter impotence. Russia has become merely a geographical expression, the combined achievement of German militarism and Russian Socialism. There is not Russia. What was once Russia is a disorganized aggregation of local governments, presenting, among other things, a wild tangle of territorial problems—and territorial problems resembling those of primeval chaos, with most landmarks entirely obliterated. The one outstanding landmark in contemporary Russia is that set up on March 3, 1918—the treaty of Brest-Litovsk. That treaty has never been recognized by any of the victorious Allies; nevertheless, it dogs them night and day in the time of triumph, embittering peace, if not preventing it, darkening counsel, and putting a strain upon friendship. The treaty of Brest-Litovsk may be repudiated by the conferees of Paris; it may be dead as far as Germany, its chief author, is concerned; but it is far from being a negligible factor in the history of the present. On the contrary, it, and the things it represents and embodies in its fell phrases, are bound to exercise a profound and disturbing influence upon the future. Where does one find anything in Germany parallel to this inner transformation? The history of Germany during the last forty years, during the last ten years, has shown the contrary phenomenon: a growing and not a decreasing harmony between the governors and the governed. If one wishes to test this statement, let him compare the stand taken by the only so-called opposition party in the war of 1870 and the war of our own day. In the former, the Socialists, who were few in number, were opposed to militarism, to aggrandizement, to the declaration of war, and to the annexation of Alsace-Lorraine, and their leaders, Bebel and Liebknecht, paid for their opposition by being thrown into prison. The Socialists of to-day, vastly more numerous and with far greater powers of opposition, have compromised with militarism, have warmly approved annexations by voting for the treaty of Brest-Litovsk, and have on every and all occasions, in the year of our Lord 1918, joined in the general clamor that Alsace-Lorraine must never be surrendered. It would seem to be the business of an opposition to oppose. Should there emerge from the Assembly of Weimar a German democracy, that democracy will be the expression of German psychology. German psychology caused the war and kept it going. The ruling classes would never have risked the war, had they not known the temper and the nature of the German people. Nothing has yet occurred to show that the great masses of the people differed in 1914 from their rulers, either in their conceptions of the nature and the duty of the state, in their moral indifferentism, or in their arrogance and conceit. The defeat Germany has sustained may abate somewhat her contempt of other nations. It is not likely to diminish her hatred of them. It is far more likely to intensify that hatred. Men do not love their enemies any the more because their enemies have compelled them to bite the dust. What we know about the Germans does not lead up to believe, either that they have changed in essentials, or that they are changing, or that they are likely to change and to give the world the spectacle of the miracle of a new psychology. The majority of the members of the National Assembly of Weimar were members of the Reichstag, and belonged to parties that enthusiastically supported the policies of the Empire.

Explanation: Facts

Answer:

happy

Explanation:

Answer:Indeed, in order to understand Mexico's viewpoint with regard to the war with the United States, it is necessary to consider three important issues: first, Mexico's internal state of affairs during the 1840s; second, the problem of Texas; and third, the U.S. invasion of Mexican territory.

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

The person above is correct. Thx!

Answer:

Special bow and arrows

Explanation:

I remember this from 6th grade.

Answer:

It refers to a social relationship with the owner of the property that takes possession of anything

Explanation:

I hope I helped :>

Answer:

William I became one of the strongest power in Europe

The Putsch

By November 1923, Hitler and his associates had concocted a plot to seize power of the Bavarian state government (and thereby launch a larger revolution against the Weimar Republic) by kidnapping Gustav von Kahr (1862-1934), the state commissioner of Bavaria, and two other conservative politicians.

(If you can please give me brainiest)

Answer:

I will help if u answer my queston

Explanation:

Answer:

The Axis powers, also known as the Rome–Berlin–Tokyo Axis was a military coalition that fought in World War II against the Allies. The Axis powers agreed on their opposition to the Allies, but did not completely coordinate their activity.There were two major alliances during World War II: the Axis and the Allies.The three principal partners in the Axis alliance were Germany, Italy, and Japan. These three countries recognized German domination over most of continental Europe; Italian domination over the Mediterranean Sea; and Japanese domination over East Asia and the Pacific.The Allied Powers were led by Great Britain, the United States, and the Soviet Union.

Explanation:

Answer:

The Correct answer I believe is 2

Explanation:

Answer:

Zoology and astronomy

Explanation:

Answer:

zoology and astronomy

Explanation:

Answer:

The date 2,000 B.C. means 2,000 years before Jesus was born. In 2009, that date would have been 4,009 years ago!

Explanation:

Answer:

If you're talking about the US Civil War, slavery.

Explanation:

Answer:

reserved by the state government only

Answer:

National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP)

Answer:

Oatmeal is a type of coarse flour made of hulled oat grains that have either been milled or steel-cut. Ground oats are also called "white oats". Steel-cut oats are known as "coarse oatmeal", "Irish oatmeal" or "pinhead oats".

Explanation:

Answer:

time make us ..........................

Answer:

Good question though..

Answer:

B

Explanation:

Sibley Commission recommended that local school systems be allowed to decide if they would act by a probable court order to integrate public schools or if they would close them.

By 1960, the debate over integration continued in Georgia, The citizens throughout the state could voice their opinions on segregation directly supporting the efforts of the Sibley Commission.

The term citizen can be referred to that A citizen is a person who, by place of birth, nationality of one or both parents, or naturalization, is granted full rights and responsibilities as a member of a nation or political community. By living in their countries for many years, citizenship can also be granted.

A commission was established in 1960 by Atlanta banker John Sibley to hold public hearings to gauge Georgians' attitudes about integration. Two out of three Georgians, according to the Sibley Commission, would rather see schools closed than integrated.

Therefore, option (B) is correct.

Learn more about citizens here:

https://brainly.com/question/455363

#SPJ6

Answer:

Because Europe is a huge peninsula, most land in Europe lies within 300 Miles of a seacoast. This further encouraged trade and the growth of economy.

Explanation:

Answer:

MacArthur plans were too aggressive

Explanation:

Answer:

he should provide evidence and thouroughly explain the illegal laws ans why theyre illegal

Answer:

So the Papal States are in Italy and England is in the UK. So its safe to say that they are South East of England.

Answer:

Resurrection

Explanation: