I need help with problem.

Answer:

[tex]log_4(\frac{1}{64})=-3[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]log_b(b^x)=x[/tex]

    Looking at the equation given, we know the base (the number with the exponent) is 4, the exponent itself is -3, and the value is 1/64. Based on this information, fill in the formula and simplify any values.

[tex]log_4(4^{-3})=-3\\log_4(\frac{1}{64})=-3[/tex]

Therefore, the logarithmic form is [tex]log_4(\frac{1}{64})=-3[/tex].

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

Commission: 22264*0.12=2671.68

Total pay: 14250+2671.68=16921.68

The total pay of Sara after adding the commission is: Option A:  AED 16921.68

Sara's total pay consists of her basic salary plus the commission on her sales.

Basic salary = AED 14250

Commission on sales = 12% of AED 22264

Commission = 0.12 * 22264

Now, calculate the commission:

Commission = 0.12 * 22264 = AED 2671.68

Total pay = Basic salary + Commission

Total pay = 14250 + 2671.68 = AED 16921.68

So, Sara's total pay is AED 16921.68

Read more about Net Income at: https://brainly.com/question/30404567

#SPJ3

Answer:

45.05 seconds

Step-by-step explanation:

Use the formula: d = v[tex]i[/tex] t + [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex] a[tex]t^{2}[/tex]

d = distance      v[tex]i[/tex] = initial velocity (m/s)    

t = time (s)     a = acceleration (m/[tex]s^{2}[/tex])

m is meters and s is seconds. They are units of measurement so leave them be.

Assuming the object is simply dropped, the initial velocity is 0 since the object was not moving before it was dropped.

The distance is 725 feet, which is 220.98 meters.

The acceleration is 9.81m/[tex]s^{2}[/tex] since that is the acceleration of Earth's gravity, aka free fall.

Time is what we are trying to find so just leave it as the variable t.

So plug the values into the equation:

220.98m = (0)(t) + [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex] (9.81m/[tex]s^{2}[/tex])(t)

220.98m = (4.905m/[tex]s^{2}[/tex])(t)

45.0519877676s = t

t = 45.05s

Remember to pay attention to units because your answer will be wrong otherwise

Answer:

increse X-inefficiency is the answer

Step-by-step explanation:  im here to help

Answer:

No question!

Step-by-step explanation:

Hi! Could you please insert a question so I could answer for you?

I would love to help!

Answer:

The answer would be 4

Step-by-step explanation:

Calculate it

Answer:

4 is the answer.

Step-by-step explanation:

-6 - 10k

=> -6 - 10(-1)

=> -6 + 10

=> 4

Therefore, 4 is the answer.

Hoped this helped.

Answer:

see explanation

Step-by-step explanation:

(16)

The mid segment ZW is half the sum of the parallel bases

ZW = [tex]\frac{38+20}{2}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{58}{2}[/tex] = 29

(17)

The lower base angles are congruent , so

∠ UYX = ∠ VXY = 35°

(18)

Any lower base angle is supplementary to any upper base angle , then

∠ VUY = 180° - ∠ UYX = 180° - 35° = 145°

(19)

[tex]\frac{UV+XY}{2}[/tex] = ZW

[tex]\frac{3x-1+7x+1}{2}[/tex] = 10 ( multiply both sides by 2 to clear the fraction )

10x = 20 ( divide both sides by 10 )

x = 2

Then

XY = 7x + 1 = 7(2) + 1 = 14 + 1 = 15

(20)

The legs are congruent , so

UY = VX

5a - 6 = 3a + 2 ( subtract 3a from both sides )

2a - 6 = 2 ( add 6 to both sides )

2a = 8 ( divide both sides by 2 )

a = 4

[tex]\huge \bf༆ Answer ༄[/tex]

As we know, sum of interior angles of a triangle is 180°

that is ~

Hence, value of x is 9°

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Sum of interior angles is 180:

Answer:

-43

Step-by-step explanation:

By staring at it for a while you can tell that you're losing 5 every step. You can write the succession as [tex]a_n = 32-5n[/tex] (please notice the first terms starts when [tex]n=0[/tex], not 1!). The 16th term happens at [tex]n=15[/tex]:

[tex]a_1_5=32-5(15) = -43[/tex]

Answer:

4x+14 = 2(2x+7}

12x+6=6{2x+1}

Answer:

24m + 3 or (24 × m) + 3

Step-by-step explanation:

product = multiplying

matts height = variable

more than = addition

add together and that's your algebraic expression hope this helps :)

Answer:

  80

Step-by-step explanation:

If we assume the triangles are similar and are isosceles, and that BK is an altitude, then we can work the problem.

Triangle OKN will be similar to triangle BKA, so ...

  AN : AK = BO : BK = 1 : 3

Then ...

  AN : AK : KC = 1 : 3 : 3

In terms of ratio units, ...

  AN = 1

  AC = 3+3 = 6

  NC = 6-1 = 5

This means NC : AC = 5 : 6. The triangle perimeters will have the same ratio.

  perimeter(NMC) = 5/6·perimeter(ABC) = 5/6·96

  perimeter(NMC) = 80

Answer:

h(x) = |x + 4| - 2

Step-by-step explanation:

Translation of functions:

- 4 on the x-axis ⇒ |x + 4|

- 2 on the y-axis ⇒ -2

Step-by-step explanation:

Given,

x² - 2x - 3 = 0

x² - (3x - x) - 3 = 0

x² - 3x + x - 3 = 0

x(x - 3) + 1(x - 3) = 0

(x - 3)(x + 1) = 0

x = 3 & -1

Now,

a and b are integers

So

a = 3 & b = -1 or

a = -1 & b = 3

Answer:

a = 3 , b = -1          or            a = -1 , b = 3

Step-by-step explanation:

x² - 2x - 3 = 0

x² - 3x + 1x - 3 = 0

x ( x - 3 ) +1 ( x - 3 ) = 0

( x - 3 ) ( x + 1 ) = 0

So,

x - 3 = 0                   or                x + 1 = 0

x = 0 + 3                                      x = 0 - 1

x = 3                                            x = -1

Therefore,

( x - a) ( x - b )

As a and b are integers

It can be,

a = 3 , b = -1          or            a = -1 , b = 3

Hope this helps you.

Let me know if you have any other questions :-)

Answer:

D.18

Step-by-step explanation:

6-x=-12

-x=-12-6

-x=-18   divide both sides by -1

x=18

Answer:

7x-8

  3

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

2 1/3x - 2 2/3

Step-by-step explanation:

1/3 x 5

1/3 x -8

and add 2/3x to the mix

so

1 2/3x - 2 2/3x + 2/3x = 2 1/3x - 2 2/3

Answer:

Black

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Substitute

Step-by-step explanation:

x=75.6

-8.56(75.6) + 31.7=-615.436

Answer: -615.436

if

bcaz according to property of transitivity

An example of a transitive law is “If a is equal to b and b is equal to c, then a is equal to c.” There are transitive laws for some relations but not for others. A transitive relation is one that holds between a and c if it also holds between a and b and between b and c for any substitution of objects for a, b, and c.

Answer:

-3

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve you replace the -z with 2 because the -2=z not -z. With the z in parenthesis being negative it basically means invers so you would put the invers or opposite of -2 in the parentheses.

-1-(2)

-1+-2

=-3

The value of the expression -1 - (-z) where z = -2 is -3.

To evaluate the expression -1 - (-z) where z = -2, follow these steps:

Replace z with -2 in the expression:

= -1 - (-(-2))

Simplify the double negative:

= -1 - (2)

Perform the subtraction:

= -3

So, the value of the expression -1 - (-z) where z = -2 is -3.

Learn more about Evaluate

https://brainly.com/question/29170041

#SPJ3

Answer:

any number between the two

for example: 0.1309, 0.1308, 0.1301, etc.

Step-by-step explanation:

hope this helped :)

Step-by-step explanation:

0.1308, 0.1309, 0.1301

Answer:

-1

Step-by-step explanation:

-3(2) = -6 + 5 = -1

Answer:

-1

Step-by-step explanation:

-3u + 5 =?

when u=2

= -3(2) + 5

= -6 + 5

= -1

Using the normal distribution, it is found that there is a 0.1357 = 13.57% probability that the total  amount paid for these second movies will exceed $15.00.

In a normal distribution with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the z-score of a measure X is given by:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

In this problem:

The probability is 1 subtracted by the p-value of Z when X = 15, hence:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

Considering the n instances:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - n\mu}{s}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{15 - 14.1}{0.8216}[/tex]

[tex]Z = 1.1[/tex]

[tex]Z = 1.1[/tex] has a p-value of 0.8643.

1 - 0.8643 = 0.1357.

0.1357 = 13.57% probability that the total  amount paid for these second movies will exceed $15.00.

A similar problem is given at https://brainly.com/question/25769446

Answer:

Its arithmetic because it's being added 3 each time.

Answer:

Arithmetic

Step-by-step explanation:

Arithmetic refers to addition and subtraction. Geometric refers to multiplication and division.

In this instance, the sequence has a common difference of 3 (3 is added as the sequence continues).

Answer:

A. 8 to 3

Step-by-step explanation:

since its in favor, the amnt of white marbles goes first.

Answers: Choice B and Choice D.

[tex]\angle ABE \cong \angle CDE[/tex]  and [tex]\overline{AE} \cong \overline{CE}[/tex]

=====================================================

Explanation:

The tickmarks tell us which segments are congruent to one another. The segments with single tickmarks show that AE and CE are the same length. So this is why [tex]\overline{AE} \cong \overline{CE}[/tex]

---------------

The two triangles AEB and CED can be proven congruent through the use of the SAS theorem. From there, use CPCTC to conclude that the corresponding angles ABE and CDE are the same measure i.e. [tex]\angle ABE \cong \angle CDE[/tex]. They are alternate interior angles which helps lead to side AB being parallel to CD.

Answer:

B & D  or <ABE=<CDE, AE=CE

Step-by-step explanation:

I got it right on khan

Answer:

O It is less than 5.

Step-by-Step

OK so, first u check if it has a negative. It does, so its at the left of 0. SO you know its less than.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

If the price is supposed to be dropping with each year, maybe your year/price chart would reflect that. Seems to me that the price rose between 2015 and 2016 and even by 2017 the value was still higher than it was in 2015.

I have no way of knowing how to fix this.

Let's ASSUME that the 2015 price was $71,445 and that the 2016 and 2017 prices are valid.

the decrease between 2015 and 2016 is (71445 - 68640) / 71445 = 0.03926

or 3.926%

the decrease between 2016 and 2017 is (68640 - 65945)/68640 = 0.03926

or 3.926%

so the price each year after new is

p = 71445(1 - 0.03926)ⁿ

or

71445(0.96074)ⁿ

where n is the number of years.

To get the monthly version, we divide the decrease by 12

p = 71445(1 - 0.03926/12)ˣ

or

p = 71445(1 - 0.00327)ˣ

or

p = 71445(0.99673)ˣ

where x is the number of months since new.

This may not be your exact answer, but the same method can be used if you get real numbers.