I need help :) plss with this question

Answer: Additive Inverse of 17 = -17

The two addends in an addition equation are interchangeable, which means that the answer to "What is the additive inverse of -17?" or "What is the additive inverse of negative 17?" is 17. Since the additive inverse of 17 is -17, additive inverse is also known as the opposite number.

Step-by-step explanation:

is this what you meant??

Answer:

x-8 is a factor of f(x)

Step-by-step explanation:

The polynomial remainder theorem states that the remainder of the division of a polynomial f(x) by (x-a) is equal to f(a).

We are given the function

[tex]f(x)=-2x^3+17x^2-64[/tex]

And it's required to find if x-8 is a factor of f.

Applying the mentioned theorem, we only have to find f(8):

[tex]f(8)=-2\cdot 8^3+17\cdot 8^2-64[/tex]

Operating:

[tex]f(8)=-2\cdot 512+17\cdot 64-64[/tex]

[tex]f(8)=-1024+1088-64[/tex]

[tex]f(8)=0[/tex]

Thus, x-8 is a factor of f(x)

Answer:

8.25 years

Step-by-step explanation:

hope this helps :)

Answer:

Thank you and please rate me as brainliest as it will help me to level up

Answer:

y=mx+b 58

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

2( w + 3 )

Step-by-step explanation:

Well first off, since theres no common term to factor out, I had to split 6 in half

so 2 w + 6 becomes 2w + 2 x 3.

I then factored out 2 because it's a common term,

which then leaves: 2( w + 3 )

basically, you have to find a common term to factor out, if you don't see one, you have to do something to a number so there's common terms.

Answer:

(0,-4)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

You should use the y2 - y1 /x2 - x1

To find the answer you should be able to plug in the x and the y in the equation with the coordinates that you have but I'm not sure if you don't have what you'll do

Answer:

Algebraic expression for 75 less than twice Mabel's score is 2m-75

Step-by-step explanation:

We need to translate the phrase 75 less than twice Mabel's score into algebraic expression.

Translating into algebraic expression

Let m represent Mabel's score

Twice Mabel's score = 2m

75 less than Twice Mabel's score = 2m-75

So, algebraic expression for 75 less than twice Mabel's score is 2m-75

Answer:

x = 2 or x = -3

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that ∆ABC ≅ ∆SRT, it follows that their corresponding side lengths are congruent to each other.

Thus:

[tex] RT = BC [/tex]

[tex] (x^2 + x) = 6 [/tex]

Solve for x

[tex] x^2 + x = 6 [/tex]

Subtract 6 from each side

[tex] x^2 + x - 6 = 6 - 6 [/tex]

[tex] x^2 + x - 6 = 0 [/tex]

Factorise

[tex] x^2 + 3x - 2x - 6 = 0 [/tex]

[tex] x(x + 3) -2(x + 3) [/tex]

[tex] (x - 2)(x + 3) [/tex]

x = 2 or x = -3

Answer: A) [tex]y=13e^{-0.1359t}[/tex]

              B) H = 5.10

              C) Yes

Step-by-step explanation: Exponential Decay function is a model that describes the reducing of an amount by a constant rate over time. Generally, it is written in the form: [tex]y(t)=Ce^{rt}[/tex]

A) C is initial quantity, in this case, the initial concentration of DDT. To determine r, using the data given:

[tex]y(t)=Ce^{rt}[/tex]

[tex]2.22=13e^{13r}[/tex]

[tex]e^{13r}=0.1708[/tex]

Using a natural logarithm property called power rule:

[tex]13r=ln(0.1708)[/tex]

[tex]r=\frac{ln(0.1708)}{13}[/tex]

[tex]r=-0.1359[/tex]

The decay function for concentration of DDT through the years is [tex]y(t)=13e^{-0.1359t}[/tex]

B) The value of H is calculated by [tex]y=C(0.5)^{\frac{t}{H} }[/tex]

[tex]2.22=13(0.5)^{\frac{13}{H} }[/tex]

[tex](0.5)^{\frac{13}{H} }=0.1708[/tex]

Again, using power rule for logarithm:

[tex]\frac{13}{H} log(0.5)=log(0.1708)[/tex]

[tex]\frac{13}{H} =\frac{log(0.1708)}{log(0.5)}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{13}{H} =2.55[/tex]

H = 5.10

Constant H in the half-life formula is H=5.10

C) Using model [tex]y(t)=13e^{-0.1359t}[/tex] to determine concentration of DDT in 1995:

[tex]y(24)=13e^{-0.1359.24}[/tex]

y(24) = 0.5

By 1995, the concentration of DDT is 0.5 ppm, so using this model is possible to reduce such amount and more of DDT.

Answer:

you have to post the equation

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

0.85 of the original piece of lumber remains.

Step-by-step explanation:

Well, this lumber piece of lumber started as 2.5 meters long. Then, a 1.65 meter piece was cut off of it. All we need to do is subtract.

2.5 - 1.65 =

2.50 - 1.65 = 0.85.

Therefore, 0.85 of the original piece of lumber remains.

Hope this helps! :)

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

138/8 = 17.25

Step-by-step explanation:

number less than 1 B.4/9+ a fraction less than 12 C. 1 3/4 - a fraction less than 3/4 D.7/8 a number less than 1

Answer:

The circumference of a circle is C = 2πr^2 (2nd power) Radius (r) is the distance from the center of the circle to the outside of it. To find radius divide the diameter (d) by 2. The diameter (d) of a circle is the radius (r) multiplied by 2. To find the diameter (d) you need to do C ÷ π.

For example):

Finding diameter - 76/3.14 = 24.19 (d)

Finding radius - 24.19/2 = 12.095 (r)

Answer:

14.4 there sorry for the wait

Answer:

D

Step-by-step explanation:

I got it right

Using the normal distribution, it is found that 66.9% of filled boxes of rice have a weight between 28 and 29 ounces.

The z-score of a measure X of a normally distributed variable with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex] is given by:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

In this problem, the mean and the standard deviation are given, respectively, by: [tex]\mu = 28.2, \sigma = 0.4[/tex].

The proportion of filled boxes of rice have a weight between 28 and 29 ounces is the p-value of Z when X = 29 subtracted by the p-value of Z when X = 28, hence:

X = 29:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{29 - 28.2}{0.4}[/tex]

Z = 2

Z = 2 has a p-value of 0.977.

X = 28:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{28 - 28.2}{0.4}[/tex]

Z = -0.5

Z = -0.5 has a p-value of 0.308.

0.977 - 0.308 = 0.669 = 66.9%.

More can be learned about the normal distribution at https://brainly.com/question/24663213

#SPJ2

Answer:

3/4

Step-by-step explanation:

up 3 over 4

Answer:

Approximately 262%

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the percentage increase divide the new amount of offenses by the old amount of offenses:

2448/935 = 2.618

2.618 rounds to 2.62. Convert 2.62 into a percentage: 262%

The percentage increase between the amount of offenses in 2000 and the amount of offenses in 2019 is approximately 262%.

Answer:

1. A) OPS is congruent to RSU

2. C) RSP is congruent to TSU

Step-by-step explanation:

1. Since OQ and RT are parallel lines that are cut across by the transversal line, NU, therefore, angle OPS and angle RSU are corresponding angles formed. Corresponding angles are congruent.

✅Therefore: A) OPS is congruent to RSU. OPTION A IS TRUE.

❌OPS and RSP are consecutive interior angles. They are not congruent. They are supplementary. So, option B is NOT TRUE.

❌OPS and OPN are linear pair angles. Linear pair angles are not congruent. They are supplementary. Therefore, OPTION B IS NOT TRUE.

OPS and TSU are also not congruent.

2. Angle RSP and angle RSU are vertical angles. Vertical angles are congruent. Therefore, the statement that IS TRUE is:

C) RSP is congruent to TSU

Answer:

Alice's salary is 1.56 times Wally's salary

Step-by-step explanation:

Let Wally's salary = x

Alice's salary = x + 56% of x

                     = x + 0.56x

                    = 1.56x

                    = 1.56 * Wally's salary

Answer:b

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

xfghzfgfrxeshixeah

Step-by-step explanation:

LG's SSL looks sl lid

Answer:

because a function always gives a determined answer from what was placed into the domain, this is not a function. what is put into the domain (students) may not get the same result through f.

Answer: 1. the students 2. the final exams 3. is- domain- one- range   brainliest plzz??