I need help on number 3 please

           The Jim Crow Laws had a profound and lasting effect on interracial relationships in the United States. After the law was enacted, it became illegal for African Americans to marry or have any kind of intimate relations with white individuals in any of the southern states where the law was in place. This meant that individuals in such relationships could not live together as a married couple, could not partake in any kind of public demonstration of love and affection, and could even be arrested for their involvement with one another. The Jim Crow Laws thus successfully separated the races and created a great rift between them by limiting their ability to form even the most basic forms of relationships.

             The passage of the Jim Crow Laws has far-reaching effects not just on interracial relationships, but also on the overall perceptions of race in the US. Stereotypes such as the notion that white people were superior to African Americans were perpetuated. Additionally, African American individuals had fewer legal rights in terms of marriage and other forms of social interactions with white individuals. Given their lack of ability to fight back against the law, this meant that the racism and hatred prevalent in society during that time only worsened. The Jim Crow Laws thus contributed to creating a hostile and sometimes violent environment towards interracial relationships and continue to be a blight (disruption) on the history of race relations in the US.

Answer:

No, they were not completed before Japanese prisoners arrived.

Explanation:

The internment camps were hastily erected, and the government was in a rush to quickly relocate Japanese-Americans during World War II in fear of national security after the bombing of Pearl Harbor, hence the camps were not completed before the arrival of the forced internees.

Conkling and President Garfield engaged in a heated and public feud over favoritism in Conkling's native New York after the Republican win in November 1880.

Scott Joplin, an African-American pianist and composer, is known as the "King of Ragtime". He played a role in the acceptance of a new musical period. His well-known ragtime song, The Maple Leaf Rag, was first released in 1899, which you might be familiar with.

Washington advocated tenacity, hard effort, and a practical education as means of obtaining financial independence. His energy and vision helped Tuskegee grow into a significant African-American presence and educational center.

James A. Garfield-  a Republican president who was against favoritism

Scott Joplin- A musician dubbed the "King of Ragtime"

Booker T Washington- The founder of the Tuskegee

Andrew Carnegie- thought that affluent Americans should use their riches to enable others to assist themselves

Herbert Spencer- asserted that civilization developed because only the strongest individuals lived.

Ida B Wells- Writer who led an anti-lynching campaign

Thomas Eakins- Maybe the most well-known realist painter in America

Grover Cleveland and James B Weaver- Populist and Democratic presidential nominee In 1896

Du Bois- Wrote that "color discrimination" is a barbarism

Jane Adams- inaugurated Hull House in Chicago

Learn more about Scott Joplin: https://brainly.com/question/3045794

#SPJ1

Answer:

Explanation:

The Boston Tea Party was a political protest that occurred on December 16, 1773, in Boston, Massachusetts. The most characteristic feature of the Boston Tea Party was the colonists' act of dumping crates of British tea into Boston Harbor. This action was a defiant response to the Tea Act, which had been passed by the British Parliament and was seen by the colonists as an unjust imposition of taxes without representation. The Boston Tea Party is also significant for the spirit of resistance and rebellion that it embodied, as well as for its role in galvanizing support for the American Revolution.

1. Increased Accessibility: Congress.gov provides citizens with easy access to information about proposed and current legislation, as well as other activities taking place in Congress.

Legislation is the process of making or enacting laws. It is the act of making official rules and regulations that are enforced by a governing body. Legislation is important for setting out the laws that must be followed in a given society and for providing a framework for governing.

This makes it easier for citizens to stay informed and engaged in the political process.

2. Improved Transparency: Congress.gov provides transparency about how their representatives are voting and how Congress is working. This encourages citizens to hold their representatives accountable and to better understand what their representatives are doing on their behalf.

3. Enhanced Citizen Participation: Congress.gov provides resources for citizens to contact their representatives and provide feedback, offer support for or oppose legislation, or suggest amendments. This encourages citizens to be more involved in the political process.

4. Improved Communication: Congress.gov provides a platform for citizens to communicate with their representatives and to learn more about the political pro

To learn more about legislation

https://brainly.com/question/12561643

#SPJ1

The Marchesa of Mantua and a significant figure in Italian Renaissance culture was Isabella d'Este. She was a political figure who ruled Mantua as regent for her husband and son in the early 16th century. She is renowned as a trendsetter and patron of the arts, popularizing clothes and artistic forms.

Leonardo spent many months in Mantua beginning in late 1499, where he met Isabella and created a full portrait drawing of her. The marchioness wrote to the artist in the years that followed to request that he work on other paintings and projects.

Mother of seven children, Isabella d'Este (Gonzaga) was a prominent and intelligent politician, philanthropist, and patron of the arts. She was referred to as "The First Lady of the Renaissance" and was linked to almost every Italian tsar either via marriage or birth.

To know more about Isabella de Este, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/410446

#SPJ1

Explanation:

The John Burke and J.P. Nettl readings present different perspectives on the role of government regulation of technology, but both authors highlight the importance of government intervention in ensuring that technology is used for the benefit of society.

Burke argues that government regulation is necessary to prevent the negative consequences of technological innovation, such as pollution, and to ensure that technological progress benefits society as a whole. He suggests that the government should work with businesses to develop regulations that encourage innovation while minimizing negative externalities. Burke also emphasizes the importance of democratic participation in decision-making about technological innovation to ensure that the public interest is served.

On the other hand, Nettl takes a more critical view of government regulation and argues that government intervention can hinder technological progress. He suggests that centralized economic systems, such as those in the Soviet Union, are less efficient at allocating resources and fostering innovation than market-based systems. Nettl also suggests that government regulation can stifle innovation by creating barriers to entry for new firms and limiting competition.

Despite these differences, both Burke and Nettl highlight the importance of balancing the benefits and risks of technological innovation. Both authors recognize that government regulation can help to ensure that technology is used in ways that benefit society while minimizing negative externalities. Additionally, both authors acknowledge the potential for unintended consequences of technological innovation and emphasize the importance of democratic participation in decision-making to ensure that the public interest is served.

In summary, while Burke and Nettl present different perspectives on the role of government regulation of technology, they both emphasize the importance of balancing the benefits and risks of technological innovation and ensuring that technology is used for the benefit of society.

If the shelter οnly hοuses dοgs and cats, the ratiο οf dοgs tο tοtal animals is 7:16. Hence, οptiοn C is cοrrect.

A ratiο in mathematics demοnstrates hοw many times οne number is present in anοther. Fοr instance, if a bοwl οf fruit cοntains eight οranges and six lemοns, the ratiο οf οranges tο lemοns is eight tο six (that is, 8:6, which is equivalent tο the ratiο 4:3). The ratiο οf οranges tο the tοtal amοunt οf fruit is 8:14, and the ratiο οf lemοns tο οranges is 6:8 (οr 3:4). (οr 4:7).

A ratiο can have any number οf quantities, such as cοunts οf peοple οr things οr measurements οf length, weight, time, etc. Bοth numbers must be pοsitive in mοst situatiοns.

Ratiο οf cats tο dοg = 9:7

Tοtal number οf cats = 9x

Tοtal number οf dοgs = 7x

Tοtal animals = 9x + 7x = 16x

Ratio of dogs to total animal = [tex]\dfrac{7x}{16x}[/tex]

Ratio of dogs to total animal = [tex]\dfrac{7}{16}[/tex]

                                                = 7:16

Thus, If the shelter only houses dogs and cats, the ratio of dogs to total animals is 7:16. Hence, option C is correct.

To learn more about ratio
https://brainly.com/question/13419413

#SPJ1

Complete question:

An animal shelter has a ratio of cats to dogs that is 9:7. If the shelter only houses dogs and cats, what is the ratio of dogs to total animals?

A. 7:9

B. 7:2

C. 7:16

D. 9:16

Answer:

The homeland legislation act of 2002

Explanation:

Answer:

Homeland Security Act of 2002 | Homeland Security. A . gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

The solution for this question is option c. Congress repealed the Alien and Sedition Acts is not a consequence of the War of 1812.

what was the war of 1812?

The War of 1812 was a military conflict fought between the United States and Great Britain and their respective allies from 1812 to 1815.

The main causes of the war were British interference with American trade, impressment of American sailors into the British navy, and British support of Native American tribes that were resisting American expansion into their lands.

The war was fought on land and sea, with notable battles including the Battle of New Orleans, the Battle of Lake Erie, and the burning of Washington, D.C.

The war ended with the signing of the Treaty of Ghent in 1814, which restored the status quo ante bellum, or the situation before the war. The war is significant in American history because it solidified American independence from Great Britain and set the stage for westward expansion and territorial acquisition in the 19th century.  

To know more about war of 1812 visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13899658

#SPJ1

Han poetry has a strong folk ballad tradition influence, which is seen in the poetry collections Nineteen Old Poems and the yuefu of the Music Bureau.

To learn more about Han dynasty, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/20903726

Answer: I would agree with the Supreme Court

Explanation:

I would agree with the Supreme Court because the baker cannot be forced to bake a cake for anyone; he gets to decide who he does business with.

Answer:

D

Explanation:

Luther's Ninety-Five Theses were a list of criticisms and objections to various practices and beliefs of the Catholic Church, particularly the sale of indulgences, which were seen as corrupt and exploitative. Luther's intent was to spark a debate and discussion within the Church about these issues and to encourage reforms that would address these concerns. His initial goal was not to break away from the Catholic Church or to establish a new religion, but rather to reform the existing Church from within. However, his criticisms eventually led to a broader reformation movement and the establishment of Protestantism as a separate branch of Christianity.

Answer:

B. Abolitionist

Explanation:

The word "abolitionist" correctly replaces the question mark in the title of the timeline because the events listed all relate to the historical development of the movement to abolish slavery in the United States. The Quakers' involvement in the New York Manumission Society was an early example of abolitionist activism, and the publication of The Liberator by William Lloyd Garrison helped to galvanize the movement. The founding of the North Star by Frederick Douglass and the publication of Uncle Tom's Cabin by Harriet Beecher Stowe were both important contributions to the abolitionist cause.

Hope this helps!! Sorry if it doesn't. If you need more help, ask me! :]

Answer:

Poetry of Homer

Explanation:

Homer was a Greek poet who lived in the 8th century BCE and is known for his epic poems, "The Iliad" and "The Odyssey". These works were incredibly influential in Greek culture and helped to unite the various city-states. The events and themes in Homer's poetry provided a shared identity and cultural touchstone for the Greeks, even as they engaged in constant warfare with each other.

Answer:

The area disputed by the Ottomans and Safavids is the region of Mesopotamia, and the two rivers that flow through it are the Tigris and Euphrates.

Explanation:

Answer:

King.

Explanation:

However, this can be dependent on the structure of any given country/kingdom. In a Feudal hierarchy pyramid, the King (monarchy) has the most power, followed by Vassals, who provide troops to the king, followed by Knights (professional soldiers), and then Peasants (common folk, drafted soldiers).

In terms of how the king receive the greatest authority, it is in combination with the standard religion in the region, as well as the relations the ruling entity has with those with power. One of the most important aspect to understand about the kinghood is that most kings use some form of religion to assert their authority, also commonly referred to as The Divine Right of Kings, which worked in most religious demographics, essentially giving legitimacy to the ruling entity through giving oneself the right to rule based on a common belief.

On the topic of vassals and knights, it is important to understand that both sides provide not only loyalty, but also some sort of benefit to each other. Kings typically would look for loyalty and the usage of a vassals resources, whether for their land for food, or their population for taxes and conscription when in the season of war. Vassals would then typically draw troops from either conscription, or from knights, which are seasoned soldiers who have been trained (most likely throughout their whole life) to be professional soldiers, and typically provide their own sets of equipment for usage. However, it is noteworthy that professional armies were extremely expensive to maintain, and so only large and rich communities and nations could afford such expenditures (such as France, for example).

Sheriffs, on the other hand, is not talked about in many cases when describing the feudal system, as they mostly served a local community role in maintaining the status quo in regions controlled by the king.

~

Learn more about the feudal system, here:

https://brainly.com/question/19008677

He can still remember hearing the good news about the man's wife and children  show about Elie's transformation through his experiences so far.

Transformation is the process of changing or developing something, such as an idea, attitude, or object, in a significant and often radical way. It involves a fundamental change in structure, form, or outlook, leading to a dramatic alteration in appearance, behavior, or character. Transformation is a process that can be applied to many different types of situations, including physical, mental, and spiritual contexts. It is often seen as a journey of self-discovery and growth, allowing individuals to explore the different facets of their identity and to reach their true potential.

To learn more about transformation

https://brainly.com/question/10783581

#SPJ1

The tactic involved "Blitzkrieg" is best described as surprise attack on a country. The Option C is correct.

Blitzkrieg is a term used to describe an offensive strategy that uses mobile and maneuverable forces such as armored tanks and air support to strike a quick, focused blow at an enemy.

Such an attack should result in a quick victory while minimizing the loss of soldiers and artillery. Blitzkrieg is most famous for describing Nazi Germany's successful tactics in the early years of World War II, when German forces swept through Poland, Norway, Belgium, Holland, and France with astonishing speed and force.

Read more about Blitzkrieg

brainly.com/question/10404230

#SPJ1

Answer: Oregon borders California to the north.

Explanation:

Mexico is not a state of the U.S.

Arizona is to the east of California.

Nevada is also to the east.

Oregon is to the north.

Hope this helps!!! :)

Answer:

No, the UN Colonel would not have done the right thing if he had disobeyed orders and authorized his troops to fire on Interhamwe fighters, even if it was to protect civilians or prevent further violence.

The UN mandate for peacekeeping operations specifies that UN troops should use force only in self-defense and only to protect civilians. This is because the UN's role is to facilitate peace negotiations and ensure that agreements are respected, rather than to take sides in a conflict or engage in combat.

If the UN Colonel had authorized his troops to use force beyond what was authorized by the UN mandate, it would have violated the principles of impartiality and non-intervention that underpin UN peacekeeping operations. It could also escalate the conflict and jeopardize the safety of civilians and UN personnel.

Instead, the UN Colonel should have worked within the limits of the UN mandate to protect civilians and ensure the safety of his troops. This could include negotiating with the Interhamwe to ensure the safe passage of civilians or working with other UN agencies to provide humanitarian aid to those in need.

In summary, while it may be tempting to take unilateral action to protect civilians in a conflict zone, UN peacekeeping operations are guided by strict principles and rules to ensure that they remain impartial and effective. The UN Colonel's duty was to uphold these principles and operate within the boundaries of the UN mandate, even if it meant not taking action that he felt was necessary.

Explanation:

Cooper's settlers shoot the pigeons to defend their crops, among other things. If you had to seed your wheat twice and three times, as I have done, you wouldn't be as heavily feeling the divils, Kirby explains Leatherstocking.

Cooper's main subject is the untamedness that opposes the industrialized society. In contrast to how the settlers saw the wilderness as being tamed by their presence, Natty imagines a future in which civilization and nature may coexist. The unique contribution that this vast, unexplored wilderness brings to the complexity of America is something that he would like to preserve in an ideal world.

Instead of being motivated by patriotism or a sense of pride in one's country, the pioneers were motivated to travel and establish in the West by personal economic opportunities. The region between the Appalachian Mountains and the Atlantic Ocean was seeing an increase in population.

Learn more about industrialized society: https://brainly.com/question/1223335

#SPJ1

Answer:

During the formation of the United States of America, two major factions emerged: the Federalists and Anti-Federalists. The Federalists were supporters of a strong central government, while the Anti-Federalists believed in decentralized power, giving more autonomy to individual states. The Federalists were led by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, while the Anti-Federalists included influential thinkers like Thomas Jefferson, Patrick Henry, and Samuel Adams.

Regarding the current power and capabilities of each branch of government, the Federalists would likely support the current power and capabilities of the Executive Branch, as they believed in a strong executive power. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists would likely have concerns about the current power and capabilities of the Executive Branch, as they were wary of centralized power and feared that it could lead to tyranny.

In terms of the Legislative Branch, the Federalists would support its current power and capabilities, as they believed in a strong national government with a robust legislative branch. The Anti-Federalists, however, would likely have concerns about the current power and capabilities of the Legislative Branch, as they feared that it could become too powerful and infringe on the autonomy of individual states.

Finally, regarding the Judicial Branch, the Federalists would support its current power and capabilities, as they believed in a strong, independent judiciary to interpret and enforce the law. The Anti-Federalists would likely also support the Judicial Branch, as they recognized the importance of a fair and impartial legal system.

In the following sections of this paper, we will explore in more detail why the Federalists and Anti-Federalists would or wouldn't support the current power and capabilities of each branch of government.

Explanation:

Answer: During the early years of American democracy, two groups emerged with distinct perspectives on the role and scope of the federal government: the Federalists and Anti-Federalists. The Federalists, led by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, argued for a strong central government that could effectively govern the states and protect the nation's interests. They supported the ratification of the Constitution and believed that the separation of powers and checks and balances would prevent any one branch from becoming too powerful.

On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists, including Thomas Jefferson, Patrick Henry, and Samuel Adams, feared that a strong central government would become tyrannical and infringe upon the rights of individuals and states. They believed that the Constitution lacked a Bill of Rights that would protect citizens' individual freedoms and that states should retain more power.

Regarding the current power and capabilities of each branch of government, Federalists would likely support the executive branch's extensive powers and the ability of the Supreme Court to interpret the Constitution broadly

brainlieast is very much appreciated.

Answer:Triangle: This geometric figure is one of the most commonly found shapes in the European caves. It is often depicted in a variety of sizes and orientations.

Cross: Another common shape found in the European caves is the cross. It can be depicted in many different styles, including simple and complex designs.

Circle: The circle is also a frequently found shape in the cave art. It can be depicted as a simple outline or as a complex pattern.

Zigzag: The zigzag shape is often found in the cave art of northern Spain. It is typically depicted as a series of sharp angles that create a jagged line.

Diamond: The diamond shape is also common in the European caves. It is often depicted in a variety of sizes and orientations, and sometimes features additional geometric patterns within the shape.

The repetition of images over time and in different places is important because it suggests that these geometric figures were meaningful and significant to the people who created them. It may indicate the existence of a shared symbolic language or system of communication that was used across different communities and time periods.

The challenges of studying and understanding these early forms of communication include a lack of contextual information, such as written records or cultural artifacts, that could help to explain the meanings behind these images. The fact that these images were created thousands of years ago also makes it difficult to know exactly what the creators were trying to convey, as their worldview and cultural context may have been vastly different from our own. Finally, interpreting the meanings of these images requires a certain level of subjectivity and speculation, as we can never know for certain what the original intent behind them was.

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

Predator an animal that eats another animal

Prey an animal that is eaten by another animal

Ecosistem a comunity of organisms interact...

Biotic living things

Abiotic non liing thing

Competition the act that ocurs when organism ...

Symbiosis a relahionship where an organism...

Answer:

a  

Explanation:

A judgment made after weighing the evidence, the law, and the precedent. Also known as judgment.

A judgment is a judge's well-reasoned decision on a contested legal issue that has been presented before him. Despite the fact that it is a literary work, some standards must be adhered to.

Legal precedent is just a fancy way of saying that a decision made by a respectable court of law that is used as a reference to resolve a case with comparable facts and circumstances. A precedent refers to the cases and subjects that the court previously decided in order to settle analogous modern legal conflicts. The precedent could potentially be enforceable in court.

Learn more about Legal precedent: https://brainly.com/question/29618654

#SPJ1

Answer:

C

Explanation: