I mark as brainliest ​

Answer:

$206.9

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

K=27

Step-by-step explanation:

the answer is 27

Answer:

1.     = 5

2.     = -7

3.   = -4

△ABD and △BCD are congruent as:

∠CBD = ∠ABD (Equal Angles)

BD = BD (Common side)

The 90 degree angle (Common between both triangles)

Therefore

△ABD ≅ △BCD (By AAS)

The diagram is not drawn to scale and it appears misleading since AD appears shorter than DC. However, the smaller triangles are congruent and we can prove it using ASA.

The tickmarks on the angles show we have a pair of congruent angles. The other pair of congruent angles are the two right angles (angle BDC and angle ADB). The pair of congruent sides are DB = DB. We use the reflexive property here. The sides are between the congruent angles mentioned. So we'll use ASA and not AAS.

-------------

Extra info:

Answer:

N=85 nickels

Q=18 quarters

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  equations: q+n = 103; 0.05n +0.25q = 8.75

  solution: q=18; n=85

Step-by-step explanation:

Write one equation for the number of coins:

  q+n=103.

Write another equation for the value of the coins:

  0.05n +0.25q = 8.75.

It is often convenient to substitute for the lower value, here, using n = 103-q. This results in an equation for q with positive coefficients.

  0.05(103 -q) +0.25q = 8.75

  5.15 +0.20q = 8.75

  0.20q = 3.60

  q = 18

  n = 103 -18

  n = 85

Wes has 18 quarters and 85 nickels.

Answer:

-5

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

6

Step-by-step explanation:

18/3=6

Answer:

y=3/5x-14

Step-by-step explanation:

parallel lines have the same slope, so m=3/5

y=mx+b

-23=3/5(-15)+b

-23=-9+b

-14=b

y=mx+b

y=3/5x-14

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

hope this helps........

Answer:b

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: 0.00024414062

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The bases are not the same.

Step-by-step explanation:

12/3 is not equal to 11/3

Therefore we cannot add the exponents together.

Hope I helped :)

Answer:

(see below)

Step-by-step explanation:

12³ × 11³ is NOT equivalent to (12 × 11)[tex]^{3(3)}[/tex] because:

1) 12³ and 11³ don't have the same bases. They have to both have a base of 11 or of 12.

2) 12³ × 11³ and (12 × 11)[tex]^{3(3)}[/tex] are different because (12 × 11)[tex]^{3(3)}[/tex] is a whole different number altogether. Here's why:

12³ × 11³ = 1728 × 1331

              = 2,299,968

(12 × 11)[tex]^{3(3)}[/tex] = [tex](132)^{9}[/tex]

                  = 1.216649217 × [tex]10^{19}[/tex]

However, (12 × 11)³ would be equivalent to 12³ × 11³.

(12 × 11)³ = (132)³

               = 2,299,968

Answer:

I think its 38 however i could be wrong

Step-by-step explanation:

Self explanatory i just added them

**Put as brainliest if you wish**

Answer:

139yds

Step-by-step explanation:

area of a rectangle is length time width

9(11)=99

area of a triangle is length times width divided by 2

8(10) divided by 2=40

99+40=139

Answer:

9x^2+33x+24

Step-by-step explanation:

The factors (3x + 3)(3x + 8) can be expressed as a trinomial 9x² + 33x + 24.

Expressions are defined as mathematical statements that have a minimum of two terms containing variables or numbers.

To express (3x + 3)(3x + 8) as a trinomial, we can use the distributive property and FOIL (First, Outer, Inner, Last) method.

First, we multiply the first term of each binomial (3x) with the first term of the other binomial (3x), which gives us (3x)(3x) = 9x².

Next, we multiply the first term of one binomial (3x) with the second term of the other binomial (8), which gives us (3x)(8) = 24x.

Then we multiply the second term of one binomial (3) with the first term of the other binomial (3x) , which gives us (3)(3x) = 9x

Finally, we multiply the second term of each binomial (3) with the second term of the other binomial (8) , which gives us (3)(8) = 24

Now we add all the products to get the trinomial

9x² + 24x + 9x + 24 = 9x² + 33x + 24

Therefore, (3x + 3)(3x + 8) can be expressed as a trinomial 9x² + 33x + 24.

Learn more about Expressions here :

brainly.com/question/21751419

#SPJ2

Answer:

a = 83 inches

Step-by-step explanation:

5 * 11 = 55

7 * 4 = 28

55 + 28 = 83

Answer:

I don't know what you're saying but the answer is 6x^2+93x+162

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: 0.9968

Step-by-step explanation:

Let [tex]\overline{X}[/tex] be the sample mean life of television.

Given: [tex]\mu=138,\ \ \ \sigma^2=324\Rightarrow\ \sigma=\sqrt{324}=18,\ \ \ , n=83[/tex]

The probability that the sample mean would be less than 143.4 months will be :

[tex]P(\overline{X}<143.4)=P(\dfrac{\overline{X}-\mu}{\dfrac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}<\dfrac{143.4-138}{\dfrac{18}{\sqrt{83}}})\\\\=P(Z<2.733)=0.9969\ \ \ [\text{By p-value table}][/tex]

hence, the required probability = 0.9968

Answer:

The expected number of tests necessary for the entire group of 304 people is 180.0325

Step-by-step explanation:

Probability of person being positive = p = 0.04

Probability of person being negative = q = 1-0.04=0.96

Number of people in each group = 19

We will use binomial over here

Probability of no test positive :

[tex]P(x=0) = ^{19}C_0 (0.04)^0 (0.96)^{19} =0.460419201958[/tex]

P( at least one tests positive) = 1-P( no one tests positive)= 1-0.460419201958= 0.539580798042

Expected number of tests for each group = 1(0.460419201958)+20(0.539580798042) = 11.2520351628

Number of groups =[tex]\frac{\text{Total population}}{\text{no. of people in each group}}=\frac{304}{19}=16[/tex]

Expected number of tests necessary for the entire group of 304 people:

=[tex]\text{Expected number of tests for each group} \times \text{No. of groups}[/tex]

=[tex]11.2520351628 \times 16[/tex]

=180.0325

Hence The expected number of tests necessary for the entire group of 304 people is 180.0325

Answer:

This answer is 67 because I think its the answer and I'm really just trying to get points on early sorry but you are

Answer:

NP = 5.39

Step-by-step explanation:

This is the answer because opposite diagonals have equal lengths.

In quadrilateral LMNO which is a parallelogram, diagonals bisect each other, hence NP = LP = 5.39

A polygon can be defined as a two-dimensional closed shape with straight sides and no curved side. Types of polygons are triangle, quadrilateral, pentagon, hexagon, etc.

A parallelogram is a quadrilateral (four sides and four angles) in which opposite sides are equal and parallel. Opposite diagonals bisect each other.

In quadrilateral LMNO:

NP = LP = 5.39 (diagonals bisect each other)

In quadrilateral LMNO which is a parallelogram, diagonals bisect each other, hence NP = LP = 5.39

Find out more on polygon at: https://brainly.com/question/1592456

#SPJ2

Answer:

A)There is a recessionary gap of $25 billion.

Step-by-step explanation:

Full Employment   Consumers   Investors    Total Private    Total Saving

Income (Output)     Desire to      Desire to        Spending

                               Spend             Spend

$500                       $300                  $250           $___            $___

600                           375                   250             $___            $___

700                           450                   250             $___            $___

800                           525                   250            $___             $___

Total Private spending = Consumers desire to spend + Investors desire to spend

Total savings = Income - Total private spending

Using these formulas :

Solution Table

Full Employment   Consumers   Investors    Total Private    Total Saving

Income (Output)     Desire to      Desire to        Spending

                               Spend             Spend

$500                       $300                  $250           550            -50

600                           375                   250             625            -25

700                           450                   250             700              0

800                           525                   250            775              25

If the full-employment level of income (YF) in Table 9.2 is $800 billion So, There is a recessionary gap of $25 billion. Since total saving is $25

So, Option A is true .

wait...what?

im lost. lol

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

If the cost of college tuition in 2010 was $6016 and in 2014 was $9139, then the average rate of change in tuition during this time period was $781/year. Do you agree or disagree​?

To find the average rate of change during this time period, you need to divide the amount, in dollars, of the difference between the years and divide it by the number of years the time period was.

In 2010, the cost of the tuition was $6,016. In 2014, the cost of the tuition was $9,139. First, you need to subtract to find the difference in tuition.

[tex]9,139-6,016=3,123[/tex]

The increase in tuition for this time period is $3,123. Now, you need to find the number of years it took to increase by $3,123.

[tex]2010 \rightarrow2014 = 4 \text{ years}[/tex]

That means it took four years to increase by $3,123. Lastly, you need to find the average rate of change. You can find this by dividing the amount of dollars(the tuition increased by) by the number of years it took to increase.

[tex]\frac{\text{amount of dollars}}{\text{number of years}} = \frac{\$3,123}{4} = \$780.75[/tex]

That means the average rate of change during this time period was $780.75. Rounded to the nearest whole number, it would be $781. Therefore, you can agree that the average rate of change during this time was $781/year.

Answer:

I Agree

Step-by-step explanation:

That seems like a fair advantage for people planning to go to college!

Answer:

This should help.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

x2 + 5 x − 6  using the AC method.  ( x − 1 ) ( x + 6 )

If it is wrong I am sorry!

Answer:

[tex]x\leq -8[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation: