Answer:
forbidden language is not allowed on this site and you get banned for that
Explanation:
thank for the ponits can i also get branliyest
Allegations of a mining employee who was injured in an accident would be heard in a(n) _____. civil court appeals court criminal court supreme court
Answer:
civil court
Explanation:
Allegations of a mining employee who was injured in an accident would be heard in a civil court appeals court criminal court supreme court.
What do you mean by Court?Court, sometimes known as a court of law, is a person or group of people with the power to hear and decide matters involving civil, criminal, ecclesiastical, or military conflicts.
A number of small civil concerns are handled by civil courts, such as: consumer disputes; landlord and tenant conflicts (such as eviction, rent arrears, and repairs); (eg as faulty goods)
Tort claims, breach of contract proceedings, and landlord/tenant disputes are the three most frequent civil cases. A civil case often goes through the following stages: filing a complaint, gathering evidence, conducting a trial, and appealing the decision.
Most frequently, a judge will hear them alone and reach a decision by gathering evidence and using the pertinent legal standards. Arguments may be made regarding the veracity of the facts and the precise nature of the law. The judge will render a reasoned decision following the conclusion of the argument.
Therefore, The answer is civil court.
Learn more about Court, here;
https://brainly.com/question/13375489
#SPJ2
Do you support or oppose the death penalty? Give me couple sentences and why.
Answer:
Well I do support the death penalty. Even thought it might sound harsh, I still belive in the fair law. Like what they did in the Persian empire, an eye for an eye. If you kill someone, sure you won’t be affected that much but their families won’t see you sitting in a cell for 2-3 life sentences and eventually being set free as a “justice is served” moment. In fact if you killed someone, you would be put to death. It also sets an example for other people to not convict this crime to prevent future murders or whatever violent and unlawful things that could be comed up with.
Why would the city of Carmel-by-the-Sea, California, see a self-serving purpose in passing an ordinance prohibiting the wearing of two-inch-heeled shoes within city limits?
The city of Carmel-by-the-Sea, California, see a self-serving purpose in passing an ordinance prohibiting the wearing of two-inch-heeled shoes because:
The city council is said to be trying to stop having litigation that is brought by or as a result of visitors and residents visit. This is based on the fact that if or when they injured themselves on the town's rustic sidewalks and trails when they are wearing high-heeled shoes.
What is an ordinance?An ordinance is known to be passed due to any case of an emergency and it is one that needs a two-thirds vote of the whole governing body for passage.
The city did pass the ordinance prohibiting the wearing of two-inch-heeled shoes to avoid any form of litigation.
Learn more about California from
https://brainly.com/question/26015261