It takes approximately 2.67 × 10⁸ seconds for the light of a star to reach us from a distance of 8 × 10¹⁰ km.
The time it takes for the light of a star to reach us can be calculated using the formula t = d/c, where t is the time, d is the distance, and c is the speed of light.
In this case, the star is at a distance of 8 × 10¹⁰ km from Earth. To convert this distance to meters, we multiply by 10^6 since 1 km is equal to 10³ meters. So the distance in meters is 8 × 10¹⁶ meters.
The speed of light (c) is approximately 3 × 10⁸ meters per second. Plugging these values into the formula, we get
t = (8 × 10¹⁶ meters) / (3 × 10⁸ meters per second). Simplifying this expression gives us t ≈ 2.67 × 10⁸ seconds.
Therefore, it takes approximately 2.67 × 10⁸ seconds for the light of a star to reach us from a distance of 8 × 10¹⁰ km.
Learn more about speed here:
https://brainly.com/question/19127881
#SPJ11
2. Sodium Chloride is found easily in nature. Write the electron configuration of Nall and C1¹7.
The electron configuration of Na is 1s² 2s² 2p⁶ 3s¹, and the electron configuration of Cl is 1s² 2s² 2p⁶ 3s² 3p⁵. Sodium (Na) has 11 electrons, with one electron in its outermost shell, while chlorine (Cl) has 17 electrons, with seven electrons in its outermost shell.
The electron configuration of an atom represents the arrangement of its electrons in different energy levels or shells. In the case of sodium (Na), it has an atomic number of 11, indicating that it has 11 electrons. The electron configuration of Na is 1s² 2s² 2p⁶ 3s¹.
This means that the first energy level (1s) contains two electrons, the second energy level (2s) contains two electrons, the second energy level (2p) contains six electrons, and the third energy level (3s) contains one electron.
Chlorine (Cl) has an atomic number of 17, which means it has 17 electrons. The electron configuration of Cl is 1s² 2s² 2p⁶ 3s² 3p⁵. Similar to sodium, the first energy level (1s) contains two electrons, the second energy level (2s) contains two electrons, and the second energy level (2p) contains six electrons.
These electron configurations reveal the number and arrangement of electrons in the outermost shell, also known as the valence shell. For Na, its valence electron is in the 3s orbital, and for Cl, its valence electrons are in the 3s and 3p orbitals. These valence electrons are involved in chemical reactions, such as the formation of ionic compounds like sodium chloride (NaCl).
To learn more about electrons click here brainly.com/question/12001116
#SPJ11
Please show working out.
2. A mass of a liquid of density \( \rho \) is thoroughly mixed with an equal mass of another liquid of density \( 2 \rho \). No change of the total volume occurs. What is the density of the liquid mi
When equal masses of a liquid with density ρ and another liquid with density 2ρ are mixed, the resulting liquid mixture has a density of 4/3ρ. Thus, option A, 4/3ρ, is the correct answer.
To determine the density of the liquid mixture, we need to consider the mass and volume of the liquids involved. Let's assume that the mass of each liquid is m and the density of the first liquid is ρ.
Since the mass of the first liquid is equal to the mass of the second liquid (m), the total mass of the mixture is 2m.
The volume of each liquid can be calculated using the density formula: density = mass/volume. Rearranging the formula, we have volume = mass/density.
For the first liquid, its volume is m/ρ.
For the second liquid, since its density is 2ρ, its volume is m/(2ρ).
When we mix the two liquids, the total volume remains unchanged. Therefore, the volume of the mixture is equal to the sum of the volumes of the individual liquids.
Volume of mixture = volume of first liquid + volume of second liquid
Volume of mixture = m/ρ + m/(2ρ)
Volume of mixture = (2m + m)/(2ρ)
Volume of mixture = 3m/(2ρ)
Now, to calculate the density of the mixture, we divide the total mass (2m) by the volume of the mixture (3m/(2ρ)).
Density of mixture = (2m) / (3m/(2ρ))
Density of mixture = 4ρ/3m
Since we know that the mass of the liquids cancels out, the density of the mixture simplifies to:
Density of mixture = 4ρ/3
Therefore, the density of the liquid mixture is 4/3ρ, which corresponds to option A.
To know more about the liquid mixture refer here,
https://brainly.com/question/30101907#
#SPJ11
Complete question :
A mass of a liquid of density ρ is thoroughly mixed with an equal mass of another liquid of density 2ρ. No change of the total volume occurs. What is the density of the liquid mixture? A. 4/3ρ B. 3/2ρ C. 5/3ρ D. 3ρ
Show that the first Covarient derivative of metric tensor th
The first covariant derivative of the metric tensor is a mathematical operation that describes the change of the metric tensor along a given direction. It is denoted as ∇μgνρ and can be calculated using the Christoffel symbols and the partial derivatives of the metric tensor.
The metric tensor in general relativity describes the geometry of spacetime. The first covariant derivative of the metric tensor, denoted as ∇μgνρ, represents the change of the metric tensor components along a particular direction specified by the index μ. It is used in various calculations involving curvature and geodesic equations.
To calculate the first covariant derivative, we can use the Christoffel symbols, which are related to the metric tensor and its partial derivatives. The Christoffel symbols can be expressed as:
Γλμν = (1/2) gλσ (∂μgσν + ∂νgμσ - ∂σgμν)
Then, the first covariant derivative of the metric tensor is given by:
∇μgνρ = ∂μgνρ - Γλμν gλρ - Γλμρ gνλ
By substituting the appropriate Christoffel symbols and metric tensor components into the equation, we can calculate the first covariant derivative. This operation is essential in understanding the curvature of spacetime and solving field equations in general relativity.
To learn more about tensor click here brainly.com/question/31184754
#SPJ11
Suppose you want to operate an ideal refrigerator with a cold temperature of -12.3°C, and you would like it to have a coefficient of performance of 7.50. What is the hot reservoir temperature for such a refrigerator?
An ideal refrigerator operating with a cold temperature of -12.3°C and a coefficient of performance of 7.50 can be analyzed with the help of
Carnot's refrigeration cycle
.
The coefficient of performance is a measure of the efficiency of a refrigerator.
It represents the ratio of the heat extracted from the cold reservoir to the work required to operate the refrigerator.
Coefficient of performance
(COP) = Heat extracted from cold reservoir / Work inputSince the refrigerator is ideal, it can be assumed that it operates on a Carnot cycle, which consists of four stages: compression, rejection, expansion, and absorption.
The Carnot cycle is a reversible cycle, which means that it can be
operated
in reverse to act as a heat engine.Carnot's refrigeration cycle is represented in the PV diagram as follows:PV diagram of Carnot's Refrigeration CycleThe hot reservoir temperature (Th) of the refrigerator can be determined by using the following formula:COP = Th / (Th - Tc)Where Th is the temperature of the hot reservoir and Tc is the temperature of the cold reservoir.
Substituting
the values of COP and Tc in the above equation:7.50 = Th / (Th - (-12.3))7.50 = Th / (Th + 12.3)Th + 12.3 = 7.50Th60.30 = 6.50ThTh = 60.30 / 6.50 = 9.28°CTherefore, the hot reservoir temperature required to operate the ideal refrigerator with a cold temperature of -12.3°C and a coefficient of performance of 7.50 is 9.28°C.
to know more about
Carnot's refrigeration cycle
pls visit-
https://brainly.com/question/19723214
#SPJ11
The density of glycerin is 20 g/cm³ at 20 °C. Find the density of glycerin at 60 °C. The volume coefficient of glycerin is 5.1 x 10-4 °C-¹. A) 19.6 g/cm³ B 21.2 g/cm³ C 20.12 g/cm³ D 20 g/cm³
The correct option is D) 20 g/cm³.
The volume coefficient of glycerin is 5.1 x 10-4 °C-¹.
The temperature difference is 40°C (60°C - 20°C).
We can use the formula for calculating thermal expansion to calculate the new volume of glycerin.ΔV = V₀αΔT
Where, ΔV is the change in volume V₀ is the initial volume α is the volume coefficient ΔT is the temperature difference
V₀ = m/ρ₀
where m is the mass of the glycerin and ρ₀ is the density of glycerin at 20°C.
Now, we can substitute the values into the formula for calculating ΔV.ΔV = (m/ρ₀) α ΔT
Now, we can calculate the new volume of glycerin at 60°C.V₁ = V₀ + ΔV
Where V₁ is the new volume at 60°C, and V₀ is the initial volume at 20°C.ρ = m/V₁
Now, we can calculate the density of glycerin at 60°C.
ρ = m/V₁ρ = m/(V₀ + ΔV)
ρ = m/[m/ρ₀ + (m/ρ₀) α ΔT]ρ = 1/[1/ρ₀ + α ΔT]
ρ = 1/[1/20 + (5.1 x 10-4)(40)]
ρ = 1/[1/20 + 0.0204]
ρ = 1/[0.0504]
ρ = 19.84 g/cm³
Therefore, the density of glycerin at 60°C is 19.84 g/cm³, which rounds off to 19.8 g/cm³ (approximately).
Hence, the correct option is D) 20 g/cm³.
Learn more about volume coefficient here https://brainly.com/question/31598476
#SPJ11
Learning Goal: The Hydrogen Spectrum Electrons in hydrogen atoms are in the n=4 state (orbit). They can jump up to higher orbits or down to lower orbits. The numerical value of the Rydberg constant (determined from measurements of wavelengths) is R=1.097×107 m−1. Planck's constant is h=6.626×10−34 J⋅s, the speed of light in a vacuum is c=3×108 m/s. What is the LONGEST EMITTED wavelength? Express your answer in nanometers (nm),1 nm=10−9 m. Keep 1 digit after the decimal point. emitted λlongest = nm Part B What is the energy of the Emitted photon with the LONGEST wavelength? The photon energy should always be reported as positive. Express your answer in eV,1eV=1.6⋆10−19 J. Keep 4 digits after the decimal point. What is the SHORTEST ABSORBED wavelength? Express your answer in nanometers (nm),1 nm=10−9 m. Keep 1 digit after the decimal point.
Part A: To find the longest emitted wavelength, we will use the formula:1/λ = R [ (1/n12) - (1/n22) ]Where, R = Rydberg constantn1 = 4n2 = ∞ (for longest wavelength) Substituting the values,1/λ = (1.097 × 107 m⁻¹) [ (1/42) - (1/∞2) ]On solving,λ = 820.4 nm.
Therefore, the longest emitted wavelength is 820.4 nm. Part Bathed energy of the emitted photon with the longest wavelength can be found using the formulae = hoc/λ Where, h = Planck's constant = Speed of lightλ = Longest emitted wavelength Substituting the values = (6.626 × 10⁻³⁴ J s) (3 × 10⁸ m/s) / (820.4 × 10⁻⁹ m)E = 2.411 x 10⁻¹⁹ J.
Converting the energy to eV,E = 2.411 x 10⁻¹⁹ J x (1 eV / 1.6 x 10⁻¹⁹ J)E = 1.506 eV (approx.)Therefore, the energy of the emitted photon with the longest wavelength is 1.506 eV.
To know more about energy visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1932868
#SPJ11
Please Help
A simple ac circuit is composed of an inductor connected across the terminals of an ac power source. If the frequency of the source is halved, what happens to the reactance of the inductor? It is unch
When the frequency of an AC power source is halved in a simple AC circuit with an inductor, the reactance of the inductor increases.
The reactance of an inductor is directly proportional to the frequency of the AC power source. Reactance is the opposition that an inductor presents to the flow of alternating current. It is determined by the formula Xl = 2πfL, where Xl is the inductive reactance, f is the frequency, and L is the inductance.
When the frequency is halved, the value of f in the formula decreases. As a result, the inductive reactance increases. This means that the inductor offers greater opposition to the flow of current, causing the current to be impeded.
Halving the frequency of the AC power source effectively reduces the rate at which the magnetic field in the inductor changes, leading to an increase in the inductive reactance. It is important to consider this relationship between frequency and reactance when designing and analyzing AC circuits with inductors.
In conclusion, when the frequency of an AC power source is halved in a simple AC circuit with an inductor, the reactance of the inductor increases, resulting in greater opposition to the flow of current.
To know more about Frequency visit-
brainly.com/question/14320803
#SPJ11
1) If you add the vectors 12m South and 10m 35° N of E. the angle of the resultant is ____° S of E
2) A 125N box is pulled east along a horizontal surface with a force of 60.0N acting at an angle of 42.0°. if the force of frction is 25.0N, what is the acceleration of the box?
The acceleration of the box is 2.75 m/s².
1) If you add the vectors 12m South and 10m 35° N of E. the angle of the resultant is 25° S of E.
Consider the given vectors: The first vector is 12 m towards southThe second vector is 10 m towards the northeast which makes 35° with the east. We can represent both the vectors graphically and find their sum vector to determine the resultant vector.
When two vectors are added together, the resultant vector is obtained as shown below:
The angle of the resultant vector with the east is given by:
tanθ = (Ry/Rx)Where,Ry = 12 m - 10 sin 35°
Ry = 12 m - 5.7735 m
Ry = 6.2265 m
Rx = 10 cos 35°
Rx = 8.1773 m
Now, tanθ = (6.2265/8.1773)θ = tan-1(6.2265/8.1773)θ
= 36.869898 mθ = 37°
The angle of the resultant vector is 37° S of E.
2) A 125N box is pulled east along a horizontal surface with a force of 60.0N acting at an angle of 42.0°. if the force of frction is 25.0N,
In this question, the force that acts on the box is 60 N at an angle of 42°.
The force of friction that acts on the box is 25 N.
The net force that acts on the box is given by:
Fnet = F - fWhere,F = 60 Nf = 25 NThe net force Fnet = 35 N.
The acceleration a of the box is given by:Fnet = ma35 = m × a
The mass of the box m = 125/9.81 m/s²m = 12.71 kgTherefore, a = 35/12.71a = 2.75 m/s²
The acceleration of the box is 2.75 m/s².
Learn more about acceleration
brainly.com/question/12550364
#SPJ11
Explain each of the following cases of magnification. magnification (M) M>1, M<1 and M=1 explain how you can find the image of a faraway object using a convex lens. Where will the image be formed?
What lens is used in a magnifying lens? Explain the working of a magnifying lens.
Magnification (M) refers to the degree of enlargement or reduction of an image compared to the original object. When M > 1, the image is magnified; when M < 1, the image is reduced; and when M = 1, the image has the same size as the object.
To find the image of a faraway object using a convex lens, a converging lens is typically used. The image will be formed on the opposite side of the lens from the object, and its location can be determined using the lens equation and the magnification formula.
A magnifying lens is a convex lens with a shorter focal length. It works by creating a virtual, magnified image of the object that appears larger when viewed through the lens.
1. M > 1 (Magnification): When the magnification (M) is greater than 1, the image is magnified. This means that the size of the image is larger than the size of the object. It is commonly observed in devices like magnifying glasses or telescopes, where objects appear bigger and closer.
2. M < 1 (Reduction): When the magnification (M) is less than 1, the image is reduced. In this case, the size of the image is smaller than the size of the object. This type of magnification is used in devices like microscopes, where small objects need to be viewed in detail.
3. M = 1 (Unity Magnification): When the magnification (M) is equal to 1, the image has the same size as the object. This occurs when the image and the object are at the same distance from the lens. It is often seen in simple lens systems used in photography or basic optical systems.
To find the image of a faraway object using a convex lens, a converging lens is used. The image will be formed on the opposite side of the lens from the object. The location of the image can be determined using the lens equation:
1/f = 1/d₀ + 1/dᵢ
where f is the focal length of the lens, d₀ is the object distance, and dᵢ is the image distance. By rearranging the equation, we can solve for dᵢ:
1/dᵢ = 1/f - 1/d₀
The magnification (M) can be calculated using the formula:
M = -dᵢ / d₀
A magnifying lens is a convex lens with a shorter focal length. It works by creating a virtual, magnified image of the object that appears larger when viewed through the lens. This is achieved by placing the object closer to the lens than its focal length.
To learn more about Magnification click here brainly.com/question/21370207
#SPJ11
What is the dose in rem for each of the following? (a) a 4.39 rad x-ray rem (b) 0.250 rad of fast neutron exposure to the eye rem (c) 0.160 rad of exposure rem
The dose in rem for each of the following is:(a) 4.39 rem(b) 5.0 rem(c) 0.160 rem. The rem is the traditional unit of dose equivalent.
It is the product of the absorbed dose, which is the amount of energy deposited in a tissue or object by radiation, and the quality factor, which accounts for the biological effects of the specific type of radiation.A rem is equal to 0.01 sieverts, the unit of measure in the International System of Units (SI). The relationship between the two is based on the biological effect of radiation on tissue. Therefore:
Rem = rad × quality factor
(a) For a 4.39 rad x-ray, the dose in rem is equal to 4.39 rad × 1 rem/rad = 4.39 rem
(b) For 0.250 rad of fast neutron exposure to the eye, the dose in rem is 0.250 rad × 20 rem/rad = 5.0 rem
(c) For 0.160 rad of exposure, the dose in rem is equal to 0.160 rad × 1 rem/rad = 0.160 rem
The dose in rem for each of the following is:(a) 4.39 rem(b) 5.0 rem(c) 0.160 rem.
To know more about International System of Units visit-
brainly.com/question/30404877
#SPJ11
1. (1 p) An object has a kinetic energy of 275 J and a linear momentum of 25 kg m/s. Determine the speed and mass of the object.
An object has a kinetic energy of 275 J and a linear momentum of 25 kg m/s. The speed and mass of the object is 1.136 m/s and 22 kg respectively.
To determine the speed and mass of the object, we can use the formulas for kinetic energy and linear momentum.
Kinetic Energy (KE) = (1/2) × mass (m) × velocity squared (v²)
Linear Momentum (p) = mass (m) × velocity (v)
Kinetic Energy (KE) = 275 J
Linear Momentum (p) = 25 kg m/s
From the equation for kinetic energy, we can solve for velocity (v):
KE = (1/2) × m × v²
2 × KE = m × v²
2 × 275 J = m × v²
550 J = m × v²
From the equation for linear momentum, we have:
p = m × v
v = p / m
Plugging in the given values of linear momentum and kinetic energy, we have:
25 kg m/s = m × v
25 kg m/s = m × (550 J / m)
m = 550 J / 25 kg m/s
m = 22 kg
Now that we have the mass, we can substitute it back into the equation for velocity:
v = p / m
v = 25 kg m/s / 22 kg
v = 1.136 m/s
Therefore, the speed of the object is approximately 1.136 m/s, and the mass of the object is 22 kg.
To know more about kinetic energy here
https://brainly.com/question/999862
#SPJ4
A 28 g ball of clay traveling east at 3.2 m/s collides with a 32 g ball of clay traveling north at 2.8 m/s
The two balls will move together at a velocity of 2.987 m/s at an angle between east and north after the collision.
When the 28 g ball of clay traveling east at 3.2 m/s collides with the 32 g ball of clay traveling north at 2.8 m/s, the two balls will stick together due to the conservation of momentum.
To solve this problem, we can use the principle of conservation of momentum, which states that the total momentum before the collision is equal to the total momentum after the collision.
The momentum of an object is given by the product of its mass and velocity. Therefore, the momentum of the 28 g ball of clay before the collision is (28 g) * (3.2 m/s) = 89.6 g·m/s east, and the momentum of the 32 g ball of clay before the collision is (32 g) * (2.8 m/s) = 89.6 g·m/s north.
After the collision, the two balls stick together, so their total mass is 28 g + 32 g = 60 g. The momentum of the combined mass can be calculated by adding the momenta of the individual balls before the collision.
Therefore, the total momentum after the collision is 89.6 g·m/s east + 89.6 g·m/s north = 179.2 g·m/s at an angle between east and north.
To calculate the velocity of the combined balls after the collision, divide the total momentum by the total mass: (179.2 g·m/s) / (60 g) = 2.987 m/s.
To know more about velocity visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/30559316
#SPJ11
Show work when possible! thank you! :)
1. What equation will you use to calculate the acceleration of gravity in your experiment?
2. A ball is dropped from a height of 3.68 m and takes 0.866173 s to reach the floor. Calculate the
free fall acceleration.
3. Two metal balls are dropped from the same height. One ball is two times larger and heavier
than the other ball. How do you expect the free fall acceleration of the larger ball compares to
the acceleration of the smaller one?
1. To calculate the acceleration of gravity in the experiment, the equation used is:
g = 2h / t²
2. The free fall acceleration can be calculated as 8.76 m/s².
3. The free fall acceleration of the larger ball is expected to be the same as the acceleration of the smaller ball.
1. The equation used to calculate the acceleration of gravity in the experiment is derived from the kinematic equation for motion under constant acceleration: h = 0.5gt², where h is the height, g is the acceleration of gravity, and t is the time taken to fall.
By rearranging the equation, we can solve for g: g = 2h / t².
2. - Height (h) = 3.68 m
- Time taken (t) = 0.866173 s
Substituting these values into the equation: g = 2 * 3.68 / (0.866173)².
Simplifying the expression: g = 8.76 m/s².
Therefore, the free fall acceleration is calculated as 8.76 m/s².
3. The acceleration of an object in free fall is solely determined by the gravitational field strength and is independent of the object's mass. Therefore, the larger ball, being two times larger and heavier than the smaller ball, will experience the same acceleration due to gravity.
This principle is known as the equivalence principle, which states that the inertial mass and gravitational mass of an object are equivalent. Consequently, both balls will have the same free fall acceleration, regardless of their size or weight.
To know more about acceleration refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30660316#
#SPJ11
What must be the electric field between two parallel plates
there is a potential difference of 0.850V when they are placed
1.33m apart?
1.13N/C
0.639N/C
1.56N/C
0.480N/C
The electric field between the two parallel plates when there is a potential difference of 0.850 V and the plates are placed 1.33 m apart is 0.639 N/C.
To calculate the electric field between two parallel plates, we can use the formula:
E=V/d
Where,
E is the electric field,
V is the potential difference between the plates, and
d is the distance between the plates.
According to the question, the potential difference between the two parallel plates is 0.850 V, and the distance between them is 1.33 m. We can substitute these values in the formula above to find the electric field:E = V/d= 0.850 V / 1.33 m= 0.639 N/C
Since the units of the answer are in N/C, we can conclude that the electric field between the two parallel plates when there is a potential difference of 0.850 V and the plates are placed 1.33 m apart is 0.639 N/C. Therefore, the correct option is 0.639N/C.
To know more about electric field:
https://brainly.com/question/12324569
#SPJ11
41. Using the equations given in this chapter, calculate the energy in eV required to cause an electron's transition from a) na - 1 to n = 4. b) n = 2 to n = 4.
An electron's transition refers to the movement of an electron from one energy level to another within an atom.
The energy required for the transition from na-1 to n = 4 is -0.85 eV.
The energy required for the transition from n = 2 to n = 4 is -0.85 eV.
Electron transitions occur when an electron gains or loses energy. Absorption of energy can cause an electron to move to a higher energy level, while the emission of energy results in the electron moving to a lower energy level. These transitions are governed by the principles of quantum mechanics and are associated with specific wavelengths or frequencies of light.
Electron transitions play a crucial role in various phenomena, such as atomic spectroscopy and the emission or absorption of light in chemical reactions. The energy associated with these transitions can be calculated using equations derived from quantum mechanics, as shown in the previous response.
To calculate the energy in electron volts (eV) required for an electron's transition between energy levels, we can use the formula:
[tex]E = -13.6 eV * (Z^2 / n^2)[/tex]
where E is the energy in eV, Z is the atomic number (for hydrogen it is 1), and n is the principal quantum number representing the energy level.
(a) Transition from na-1 to n = 4:
Here, we assume that "na" refers to the initial energy level.
Using the formula, the energy required for the transition from na-1 to n = 4 is:
[tex]E = -13.6 eV * (1^2 / 4^2) = -13.6 eV * (1 / 16) = -0.85 eV[/tex]
Therefore, the energy required for the transition from na-1 to n = 4 is -0.85 eV.
(b) Transition from n = 2 to n = 4:
Using the same formula, the energy required for the transition from n = 2 to n = 4 is:
[tex]E = -13.6 eV * (1^2 / 4^2) = -13.6 eV * (1 / 16) = -0.85 eV[/tex]
Therefore, the energy required for the transition from n = 2 to n = 4 is -0.85 eV.
For more details regarding electron transitions, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29221248
#SPJ4
A 50 kg student bounces up from a trampoline with a speed of 3.4 m/s. Determine the work done on the student by the force of gravity when she is 5.3 m above the trampoline.
The work done on the student by the force of gravity when she is 5.3 m above the trampoline is approximately 2574 Joules.
To determine the work done on the student by the force of gravity, we need to calculate the change in potential-energy. The gravitational potential energy (PE) of an object near the surface of the Earth is given by the formula:
PE = m * g * h
where m is the mass of the object, g is the acceleration due to gravity, and h is the height above the reference level.
In this case, the student's mass is 50 kg and the height above the trampoline is 5.3 m. We can calculate the initial potential energy (PEi) when the student is on the trampoline and the final potential energy (PEf) when the student is 5.3 m above the trampoline.
PEi = m * g * h_initial
PEf = m * g * h_final
The work done by the force of gravity is the change in potential energy, which can be calculated as:
Work = PEf - PEi
Let's calculate the work done on the student by the force of gravity:
PEi = 50 kg * 9.8 m/s² * 0 m (height on the trampoline)
PEf = 50 kg * 9.8 m/s² * 5.3 m (height 5.3 m above the trampoline)
PEi = 0 J
PEf = 50 kg * 9.8 m/s² * 5.3 m
PEf ≈ 2574 J
Work = PEf - PEi
Work ≈ 2574 J - 0 J
Work ≈ 2574 J
Therefore, the work done on the student by the force of gravity when she is 5.3 m above the trampoline is approximately 2574 Joules.
To learn more about work , click here : https://brainly.com/question/18094932
#SPJ11
Show that x(t) = xm exp(-ßt) exp(±iwt) is a solution of the equation m kx = 0, where w and are defined by functions of m, k, and b. (10 pts) Show that y(x, t) = ym exp(i(kx ± wt)) is a solution of the wave equation dx² where v = w/k. (10 pts) d²y1d²y v² dt²³
The equation is satisfied, as both sides are equal. Therefore, y(x, t) = ym exp(i(kx ± wt)) is a solution of the wave equation d²y/dx² = (1/v²) d²y/dt², where v = w/k.
To show that x(t) = xm exp(-ßt) exp(±iwt) is a solution of the equation m kx = 0, where w and β are defined by functions of m, k, and b, we need to substitute x(t) into the equation and verify that it satisfies the equation.
Starting with the equation m kx = 0, let's substitute x(t) = xm exp(-βt) exp(±iwt):
m k (xm exp(-βt) exp(±iwt)) = 0
Expanding and rearranging the terms:
m k xm exp(-βt) exp(±iwt) = 0
Since xm, exp(-βt), and exp(±iwt) are all non-zero, we can divide both sides by them:
m k = 0
The equation angular frequency reduces to 0 = 0, which is always true. Therefore, x(t) = xm exp(-βt) exp(±iwt) satisfies the equation m kx = 0.
Now let's move on to the second part of the question.
To show that y(x, t) = ym exp(i(kx ± wt)) is a solution of the wave function equation d²y/dx² = (1/v²) d²y/dt², where v = w/k, we need to substitute y(x, t) into the wave equation and verify that it satisfies the equation.
Starting with the wave equation:
d²y/dx² = (1/v²) d²y/dt²
Substituting y(x, t) = ym exp(i(kx ± wt)):
d²/dx² (y m exp(i(kx ± wt))) = (1/v²) d²/dt² (ym exp(i(kx ± wt)))
Taking the second derivative with respect to x:
-(k² ym exp(i(kx ± wt))) = (1/v²) d²/dt² (ym exp(i(kx ± wt)))
Expanding the second derivative with respect to t:
-(k² ym exp(i(kx ± wt))) = (1/v²) (ym (-w)² exp(i(kx ± wt)))
Simplifying:
-(k² ym exp(i(kx ± wt))) = (-w²/v²) ym exp(i(kx ± wt))
Dividing both sides by ym exp(i(kx ± wt)):
-k² = (-w²/v²)
Substituting v = w/k:
-k² = -w²/(w/k)²
Simplifying:
-k² = -w²/(w²/k²)
-k² = -k²
The equation is satisfied, as both sides are equal. Therefore, y(x, t) = ym exp(i(kx ± wt)) is a solution of the wave equation d²y/dx² = (1/v²) d²y/dt², where v = w/k.
To know more about angular frequency:
https://brainly.com/question/33195438
#SPJ4
DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS NO. 3: R. (12 POINTS) A projectile is launched from the origin with an initial velocity 3 = 207 + 20. m/s. Find the (a) (2 points) initial projection angle, (b) (2 points) velocity vector of the projectile after 3 seconds of launching (c) (3 points) position vector of the projectile after 3 seconds of launching, (d) (2 points) time to reach the maximum height, (e) (1 point) time of flight (1) (2 points) maximum horizontal range reached.
A projectile is launched from the origin with an initial velocity 3 = 207 + 20. m/s. Therefore :
(a) The initial projection angle is 53.13°.
(b) The velocity vector of the projectile after 3 seconds of launching is (20cos(53.13), 20sin(53.13)) = (14.24, 14.14) m/s.
(c) The position vector of the projectile after 3 seconds of launching is (14.243, 14.143) = (42.72, 42.42) m.
(d) The time to reach the maximum height is 1.5 seconds.
(e) The time of flight is 3 seconds.
(f) The maximum horizontal range reached is 76.6 meters.
Here are the steps involved in solving for each of these values:
(a) The initial projection angle can be found using the following equation:
tan(Ф) = [tex]v_y/v_x[/tex]
where [tex]v_y[/tex] is the initial vertical velocity and [tex]v_x[/tex] is the initial horizontal velocity.
In this case, [tex]v_y[/tex] = 20 m/s and [tex]v_x[/tex] = 20 m/s. Therefore, Ф = [tex]\tan^{-1}\left(\frac{20}{20}\right)[/tex] = 53.13°.
(b) The velocity vector of the projectile after 3 seconds of launching can be found using the following equation:
v(t) = v₀ + at
where v(t) is the velocity vector at time t, v₀ is the initial velocity vector, and a is the acceleration vector.
In this case, v₀ = (20cos(53.13), 20sin(53.13)) and a = (0, -9.8) m/s². Therefore, v(3) = (14.24, 14.14) m/s.
(c) The position vector of the projectile after 3 seconds of launching can be found using the following equation:
r(t) = r₀ + v₀t + 0.5at²
where r(t) is the position vector at time t, r₀ is the initial position vector, v0 is the initial velocity vector, and a is the acceleration vector.
In this case, r₀ = (0, 0) and v₀ = (14.24, 14.14) m/s. Therefore, r(3) = (42.72, 42.42) m.
(d) The time to reach the maximum height can be found using the following equation:
v(t) = 0
where v(t) is the velocity vector at time t.
In this case, v(t) = (0, -9.8) m/s. Therefore, t = 1.5 seconds.
(e) The time of flight can be found using the following equation:
t = 2v₀ / g
where v₀ is the initial velocity and g is the acceleration due to gravity.
In this case, v₀ = 20 m/s and g = 9.8 m/s². Therefore, t = 3 seconds.
(f) The maximum horizontal range reached can be found using the following equation:
R = v² / g
where R is the maximum horizontal range, v is the initial velocity, and g is the acceleration due to gravity.
In this case, v = 20 m/s and g = 9.8 m/s². Therefore, R = 76.6 meters.
To know more about the projectile refer here,
https://brainly.com/question/28043302#
#SPJ11
A skater spins at an initial angular velocity of 11 rads/s with his arms outstretched. The skater then lowers his arms, thereby decreasing his moment of inertia by a factor 5. What is the skater's final angular velocity? Assume that any friction between the skater's skates and the ice is negligible.
The skater's final angular velocity is 55 rad/s.
We can apply the principle of conservation of angular momentum to solve this problem. According to this principle, the initial and final angular momentum of the skater will be equal.
The formula for angular momentum is given by:
L = I * ω
where
L is the angular momentum,
I is the moment of inertia, and
ω is the angular velocity.
The skater starts with an angular velocity of 11 rad/s and his arms are outstretched. [tex]I_i_n_i_t_i_a_l[/tex] will be used to represent the initial moment of inertia.
The skater's moment of inertia now drops by a factor of 5 as he lowers his arms. Therefore, [tex]I_f_i_n_a_l[/tex]= [tex]I_i_n_i_t_i_a_l[/tex] / 5 can be used to express the final moment of inertia.
According to the conservation of angular momentum:
[tex]L_i=L_f[/tex] (where i= initial, f= final)
[tex]I_i *[/tex]ω[tex]_i[/tex] = I[tex]_f[/tex] *ω[tex]_f[/tex]
Substituting the given values:
[tex]I_i[/tex]* 11 = ([tex]I_i[/tex] / 5) * ω_f
11 = ω[tex]_f[/tex] / 5
We multiply both the sides by 5.
55 = ω[tex]_f[/tex]
Therefore, the skater's final angular velocity is 55 rad/s.
Learn more about angular momentum, here:
https://brainly.com/question/29563080
#SPJ4
Δ 1 12 Consider two parallel wires where 11 is 16.1 amps, and 12 is 29.3 amps. The location A is in the plane of the two wires and is 30.0 mm from the left wire and 13.9 mm from the right wire. Given the direction of current in each wire, what is the B-field at the location A in micro Teslas? (If the B-field points toward you, make it positive; if it points away from you, make it negative. Give answer as an integer with correct sign. Do not enter unit.)
The magnetic field (B-field) at location A is -3 micro Teslas.
To calculate the magnetic field at location A, we'll use the formula for the magnetic field created by a current-carrying wire. The formula states that the magnetic field is directly proportional to the current and inversely proportional to the distance from the wire.
For the left wire, the distance from A is 30.0 mm (or 0.03 meters), and the current is 16.1 amps. For the right wire, the distance from A is 13.9 mm (or 0.0139 meters), and the current is 29.3 amps.
Using the formula, we can calculate the magnetic field created by each wire individually. The B-field for the left wire is (μ₀ * I₁) / (2π * r₁), where μ₀ is the magnetic constant (4π × 10^(-7) T m/A), I₁ is the current in the left wire (16.1 A), and r₁ is the distance from A to the left wire (0.03 m). Similarly, the B-field for the right wire is (μ₀ * I₂) / (2π * r₂), where I₂ is the current in the right wire (29.3 A) and r₂ is the distance from A to the right wire (0.0139 m).
Calculating the magnetic fields for each wire, we find that the B-field created by the left wire is approximately -13.5 micro Teslas (pointing away from us), and the B-field created by the right wire is approximately +9.5 micro Teslas (pointing towards us). Since the B-field is a vector quantity, we need to consider the direction as well. Since the wires are parallel and carry currents in opposite directions, the B-fields will have opposite signs.
To find the net magnetic field at location A, we add the magnetic fields from both wires. (-13.5 + 9.5) ≈ -4 micro Teslas. Hence, the B-field at location A is approximately -4 micro Teslas, pointing away from us.
To learn more about magnetic field click here:
brainly.com/question/14848188
#SPJ11
Located in phys lab of London. consider a parallel-plate capacitor made up of two conducting
plates with dimensions 12 mm × 47 mm
If the separation between the plates is 0.75 mm, what is the capacitance, in F, between them? If there is 0.25 C of charged stored on the positive plate, what is the potential, in volts, across
the capacitor which is also in London?
What is the magnitude of the electric field, in newtons per coulomb, inside this capacitor? If the separation between the plates doubles, what will the electric field be if the charge is kept
constant?
The capacitance is 0.088 μF. The Potential difference, V = 2836.36 V. The magnitude of the electric field between the plates is 3,781,818.18 V/m. After changing the separation between the plate, the new electric field will be: E = (1/2) × 3,781,818.18 V/m = 1,890,909.09 V/m.
Capacitance is defined as the ability of a system to store an electric charge. Capacitor, on the other hand, is an electronic device that has the ability to store electrical energy by storing charge on its plates. It is made up of two parallel plates separated by a distance d.
The capacitance of a parallel-plate capacitor is given by the formula: Capacitance, C = ε0A/d where ε0 is the permittivity of free space, A is the area of the plates and d is the separation between the plates. The capacitance can be found using the given values as: C = ε0A/d = 8.85 × 10-12 F/m × (0.012 m × 0.047 m)/(0.00075 m) = 0.088 μF. If there is a charge of 0.25 C stored on the positive plate, then the potential difference between the plates can be found using the formula: Potential difference, V = Q/CC = Q/V = 0.25 C/0.088 μF = 2836.36 V.
The magnitude of the electric field between the plates can be found using the formula: Electric field, E = V/d = 2836.36 V/0.00075 m = 3,781,818.18 V/m. If the separation between the plates doubles, the capacitance is halved, i.e. the new capacitance will be 0.044 μF. Since the charge is kept constant, the new potential difference will be: V = Q/CC = Q/V = 0.25 C/0.044 μF = 5681.82 V. The electric field is inversely proportional to the distance between the plates, so if the separation between the plates doubles, the electric field will be halved.
Therefore, the new electric field will be: E = (1/2) × 3,781,818.18 V/m = 1,890,909.09 V/m.
Let's learn more about capacitance:
https://brainly.com/question/24242435
#SPJ11
"A particle moving between the parallel plates will increase its
potential energy as it approaches the positive plate. On the other
hand, it decreases its potential as it approaches the negative
plate."
T/F
In a system of parallel plates with a constant electric field, the potential energy of a particle changes as it moves within the field, but it does not necessarily increase as it approaches the positive plate.
The potential energy of a charged particle in an electric field is given by the equation U = qV, where U is the potential energy, q is the charge of the particle, and V is the electric potential. The potential difference, or voltage, between the plates determines the change in electric potential as the particle moves within the field.
As a particle moves from the negative plate towards the positive plate, it will experience a decrease in electric potential energy if it has a positive charge (q > 0) since the electric potential increases in the direction of the electric field. Conversely, if the particle has a negative charge (q < 0), it will experience an increase in electric potential energy as it moves toward the positive plate.
Therefore, the change in the potential energy of a particle moving between parallel plates depends on the charge of the particle and the direction of its motion relative to the electric field. It is not solely determined by whether it is approaching the positive or negative plate.
To know more about electric fields visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31827683
#SPJ11
Zink has a work function of 4.3 eV. Part A What is the longest wavelength of light that will release an election from a surface Express your answer with the appropriate units.
The longest wavelength of light that can cause the release of electrons from a metal with a work function of 3.50 eV is approximately 354 nanometers.
The energy of a photon of light is given by [tex]E = hc/λ[/tex], where E is the energy, h is the Planck constant ([tex]6.63 x 10^-34 J·s),[/tex]c is the speed of light [tex](3 x 10^8 m/s)[/tex], and λ is the wavelength of light. The work function of the metal represents the minimum energy required to release an electron from the metal's surface.
To calculate the longest wavelength of light, we can equate the energy of a photon to the work function: [tex]hc/λ = 3.50 eV[/tex]. Rearranging the equation, we have λ = hc/E, where E is the work function. Substituting the values for h, c, and the work function,
we get λ[tex]= (6.63 x 10^-34 J·s)(3 x 10^8 m/s) / (3.50 eV)(1.6 x 10^-19 J/eV).[/tex]Solving this equation gives us λ ≈ 354 nanometers, which is the longest wavelength of light that can cause the release of electrons from the metal.
To learn more about Planck constant click here: brainly.com/question/27389304
#SPJ4
The longest wavelength of light that will release an electron from a zinc surface is approximately 2.89 x 10^-7 meters (or 289 nm).
To determine the longest wavelength of light that will release an electron from a zinc surface, using the concept of the photoelectric effect and the equation relating the energy of a photon to its wavelength.
The energy (E) of a photon can be calculated:
E = hc/λ
Where:
E is the energy of the photon
h is Planck's constant (6.626 x 10⁻³⁴ J·s)
c is the speed of light (3.00 x 10⁸ m/s)
λ is the wavelength of light
In the photoelectric effect, for an electron to be released from a surface, the energy of the incident photon must be equal to or greater than the work function (Φ) of the material.
E ≥ Φ
The work function of zinc is 4.3 eV
The conversion factor is 1 eV = 1.6 x 10⁻¹⁹ J.
Φ = 4.3 eV × (1.6 x 10⁻¹⁹ J/eV) = 6.88 x 10⁻¹⁹ J
rearrange the equation for photon energy and substitute the work function:
hc/λ ≥ Φ
λ ≤ hc/Φ
Putting the values:
λ ≤ (6.626 x 10⁻³⁴× 3.00 x 10⁸ ) / (6.88 x 10⁻¹⁹ J)
λ ≤ (6.626 x 10³⁴ J·s × 3.00 x 10⁸ m/s) / (6.88 x 10⁻¹⁹ J)
λ ≤ 2.89 x 10⁻⁷ m
Thus, the longest wavelength of light that will release an electron from a zinc surface is approximately 2.89 x 10^-7 meters (or 289 nm).
To know more about the Photoelectric effect, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/33463799
#SPJ4
Consider a series RLC circuit having the parameters R=200Ω L=663mH , and C=26.5µF. The applied voltage has an amplitude of 50.0V and a frequency of 60.0Hz. Find (d) the maximum voltage ΔVL across the inductor and its phase relative to the current.
The maximum voltage [tex]ΔVL[/tex]across the inductor is approximately 19.76V, and its phase relative to the current is 90 degrees.
To find the maximum voltage [tex]ΔVL[/tex]across the inductor and its phase relative to the current, we can use the formulas for the impedance of an RLC circuit.
First, we need to calculate the angular frequency ([tex]ω[/tex]) using the given frequency (f):
[tex]ω = 2πf = 2π * 60 Hz = 120π rad/s[/tex]
Next, we can calculate the inductive reactance (XL) and the capacitive reactance (XC) using the formulas:
[tex]XL = ωL = 120π * 663mH = 79.04Ω[/tex]
[tex]XC = 1 / (ωC) = 1 / (120π * 26.5µF) ≈ 0.1Ω[/tex]
Now, we can calculate the total impedance (Z) using the formulas:
[tex]Z = √(R^2 + (XL - XC)^2) ≈ 200Ω[/tex]
The maximum voltage across the inductor can be calculated using Ohm's Law:
[tex]ΔVL = I * XL[/tex]
We need to find the current (I) first. Since the applied voltage has an amplitude of 50.0V, the current amplitude can be calculated using Ohm's Law:
[tex]I = V / Z ≈ 50.0V / 200Ω = 0.25A[/tex]
Substituting the values, we get:
[tex]ΔVL = 0.25A * 79.04Ω ≈ 19.76V[/tex]
The phase difference between the voltage across the inductor and the current can be found by comparing the phase angles of XL and XC. Since XL > XC, the voltage across the inductor leads the current by 90 degrees.
To know more about inductor visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31503384
#SPJ11
A 3.0 kg falling rock has a kinetic energy equal to 2,430 J. What is its speed?
The speed of the falling rock can be determined by using the equation for kinetic energy: KE = 0.5 * m * v^2, the speed of the falling rock is approximately 40.25 m/s.
The kinetic energy of the rock is 2,430 J and the mass is 3.0 kg, we can rearrange the equation to solve for the speed:
v^2 = (2 * KE) / m
Substituting the given values:
v^2 = (2 * 2,430 J) / 3.0 kg
v^2 ≈ 1,620 J / kg
Taking the square root of both sides, we find:
v ≈ √(1,620 J / kg)
v ≈ 40.25 m/s
Therefore, the speed of the falling rock is approximately 40.25 m/s.
Learn more about mass here:
brainly.com/question/11954533
#SPJ11
An RL circuit is composed of a 12 V battery, a 6.0 H inductor and a 0.050 Ohm resistor. The switch is closed at t=0 The time constant is 2.0 minutes and after the switch has been closed a long time the voltage across the inductor is 12 V. The time constant is 1.2 minutes and after the switch has been closed a long time the voltage across the inductor is zero. The time constant is 2.0 minutes and after the switch has been closed a long time the voltage across the inductor is zero
The time constant is 1.2 minutes and after the switch has been closed a long time the voltage across the inductor is 12 V.
The RL circuit described has a time constant of 1.2 minutes, and after the switch has been closed for a long time, the voltage across the inductor is 12 V.
The time constant (τ) of an RL circuit is determined by the product of the resistance (R) and the inductance (L) and is given by the formula τ = L/R. In this case, the time constant is 1.2 minutes.
When the switch is closed, current begins to flow through the circuit. As time progresses, the current increases and approaches its maximum value, which is determined by the battery voltage and the circuit's total resistance.
In an RL circuit, the voltage across the inductor (V_L) can be calculated using the formula V_L = V_0 * (1 - e^(-t/τ)), where V_0 is the initial voltage across the inductor, t is the time, and e is the base of the natural logarithm.
Given that the voltage across the inductor after a long time is 12 V, we can set V_L equal to 12 V and solve for t to determine the time it takes for the voltage to reach this value. The equation becomes 12 = 12 * (1 - e^(-t/τ)).
By solving this equation, we find that t is equal to approximately 3.57 minutes. Therefore, after the switch has been closed for a long time, the voltage across the inductor in this RL circuit reaches 12 V after approximately 3.57 minutes.
Learn more about resistance from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/29427458
#SPJ11
The
speed of a car is found by dividing the distance traveled by the
time required to travel that distance. Consider a car that traveled
18.0 miles in 0.969 hours. What's the speed of car in km / h
(k
The speed of the car is approximately 29.02 km/h, given that it traveled 18.0 miles in 0.969 hours.
To convert the speed of the car from miles per hour to kilometers per hour, we need to use the conversion factor that 1 mile is equal to 1.60934 kilometers.
Given:
Distance traveled = 18.0 milesTime taken = 0.969 hoursTo calculate the speed of the car, we divide the distance traveled by the time taken:
Speed (in miles per hour) = Distance / Time
Speed (in miles per hour) = 18.0 miles / 0.969 hours
Now, we can convert the speed from miles per hour to kilometers per hour by multiplying it by the conversion factor:
Speed (in kilometers per hour) = Speed (in miles per hour) × 1.60934
Let's calculate the speed in kilometers per hour:
Speed (in kilometers per hour) = (18.0 miles / 0.969 hours) × 1.60934
Speed (in kilometers per hour) = 29.02 km/h
Therefore, the speed of the car is approximately 29.02 km/h.
The complete question should be:
The speed of a car is found by dividing the distance traveled by the time required to travel that distance. Consider a car that traveled 18.0 miles in 0.969 hours. What's the speed of car in km / h (kilometer per hour)?
To learn more about speed, Visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13262646
#SPJ11
choose corect one
13. The photoelectric effect is (a) due to the quantum property of light (b) due to the classical theory of light (c) independent of reflecting material (d) due to protons. 14. In quantum theory (a) t
The correct answer for the photoelectric effect is (a) due to the quantum property of light.
The photoelectric effect refers to the phenomenon where electrons are emitted from a material when it is exposed to light or electromagnetic radiation. It was first explained by Albert Einstein in 1905, for which he received the Nobel Prize in Physics
According to the quantum theory of light, light is composed of discrete packets of energy called photons. When photons of sufficient energy interact with a material, they can transfer their energy to the electrons in the material. If the energy of the photons is above a certain threshold, called the work function of the material, the electrons can be completely ejected from the material, resulting in the photoelectric effect.
The classical theory of light, on the other hand, which treats light as a wave, cannot fully explain the observed characteristics of the photoelectric effect. It cannot account for the fact that the emission of electrons depends on the intensity of the light, as well as the frequency of the photons.
The photoelectric effect is also dependent on the properties of the material being illuminated. Different materials have different work functions, which determine the minimum energy required for electron emission. Therefore, the photoelectric effect is not independent of the reflecting material.
So, option A is the correct answer.
To know more about photoelectric effect click on below link :
https://brainly.com/question/9260704#
#SPJ11
Suppose you wanted to levitate a person of mass 75.0 kg at 0.397 m above an equally charged plate on the ground below (near Earth) using electric force. What charge would the person and the charged plate have in microcoulombs (1,000,000 μC = 1 C) to three significant digits in order to balance the person's weight at that height?
To balance the person's weight at a height of 0.397 m, both the person and the charged plate should have charges of approximately 22.6 microcoulombs (μC).
The electric force between two charged objects can be calculated using Coulomb's law: F = (k * |q1 * q2|) / r²
Where F is the force, k is the electrostatic constant (approximately 9 × 10^9 N·m²/C²), q1 and q2 are the charges on the objects, and r is the distance between them. In this case, the electric force should be equal to the weight of the person: F = m * g
Where m is the mass of the person (75.0 kg) and g is the acceleration due to gravity (approximately 9.8 m/s²). Setting these two forces equal, we have: (m * g) = (k * |q1 * q2|) / r²
Now, since both the person and the plate have equal charges, we can rewrite the equation as: (m * g) = (k * q^2) / r²
Rearranging the equation to solve for q, we get: q = √((m * g * r²) / k)
Substituting the given values:
q = √((75.0 kg * 9.8 m/s² * (0.397 m)²) / (9 × 10^9 N·m²/C²))
Calculating the value: q ≈ 2.26 × 10^-5 C
Converting to microcoulombs: q ≈ 22.6 μC
Therefore, to balance the person's weight at a height of 0.397 m, both the person and the charged plate should have charges of approximately 22.6 microcoulombs (μC).
To learn more about charges:
https://brainly.com/question/27171238
#SPJ11
A small rock is thrown vertically upward with a speed of 28.4 m/s from the edge of the roof of a 35.5 m tall building. The rock doesn't hit the building on its way back down and lands on the street below. Ignore air resistance. (a) What is the speed (in m/s ) of the rock just before it hits the street? (b) How much time (in sec) elapses from when the rock is thrown until it hits the street?
To determine the speed of the rock just before it hits the street, we need to apply the conservation of energy principle. The total energy of the rock is equal to the sum of its potential energy.
At the top of the building and its kinetic energy just before hitting the street. E_total = E_kinetic + E_potentialUsing the conservation of energy formula and the known values, E_total = E_kinetic + E_potential(1/2)mv² + mgh = mghence (1/2) v² = ghv = √2ghwhere m is the mass of the rock, v is its velocity, g is the acceleration due to gravity, and h is the height of the building.
The velocity of the rock just before hitting the street is 83.0 m/s. b) We can find the time taken by the rock to hit the street using the following kinematic equation, where is the displacement, Vi is the initial velocity, g is the acceleration due to gravity, and t is the time taken. From the equation, At the top of the building and g = 9.8 m/s². Solving the quadratic equation.
To know more about conservation visit:
https://brainly.com/question/9530080
#SPJ11