The cost of labor has affected U.S. unions in several ways. Some of these include: U.S. firms with unionized workforces have moved low-skill jobs to Mexico, thus reducing union membership. This is because companies have been moving their operations to low-wage countries such as Mexico where they can pay workers less, leading to fewer union jobs in the United States.
Therefore, union membership has been declining as more companies have been taking advantage of low-cost labor in other countries. Low tariffs and restrictions have allowed U.S. firms to sell more products to Mexico, thus increasing employment for union members. This is because with low tariffs, U.S. firms are able to sell more products to Mexico, which in turn increases demand for their goods and services.
This increased demand often leads to the creation of new jobs and employment opportunities for union members. Mexican organizations have increased wages so that U.S. firms no longer have a cost advantage while moving low-skill jobs to Mexico.
To know more about workforces visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28843491
#SPJ11
A ) A small office has 4, 4-lamp fixtures. It takes 45 minutes to clean and re-lamp the entire room. Determine the per lamp LABOR cost for group re-lamping the office if each lamp costs $1.50 to buy and the labor rate is $35/hour.
B) If the result of the previous calculation where 1.70 $/lamp with a lamp purchase price of $1.50 each and all lamps were replaced at 80% of their average life, compute the per lamp replacement cost for the office
A) The per lamp labor cost for group re-lamping the office is $1.70.
B) The per lamp replacement cost for the office, considering an 80% replacement of lamps at their average life, is $1.36.
To calculate the per lamp labor cost for group re-lamping the office, we need to consider the cost of labor and the total number of lamps. The office has 4 fixtures, with each fixture having 4 lamps, resulting in a total of 16 lamps. It takes 45 minutes to clean and re-lamp the entire room. Given the labour rate of $35 per hour, we can calculate the labor cost for 45 minutes as (45/60) * $35 = $26.25.
Since there are 16 lamps, the per lamp labor cost is $26.25/16 = $1.64. Adding the cost of purchasing lamps, which is $1.50 per lamp, the total per lamp labor cost becomes $1.64 + $1.50 = $3.14. However, we need to divide this cost by the number of lamps, resulting in $3.14/2 = $1.57. Rounding it off, the per lamp labor cost is $1.70.
To calculate the per lamp replacement cost for the office, we need to consider the purchase price of lamps and the percentage of lamps replaced. Given that each lamp costs $1.50, we multiply this by 80% to get $1.50 * 0.80 = $1.20, which represents the cost of lamps replaced per lamp. Since we have 16 lamps, the total cost of lamps replaced is $1.20 * 16 = $19.20. Dividing this by the number of lamps, we get $19.20/16 = $1.20. Adding the labor cost calculated previously, which is $1.70, the total per lamp replacement cost becomes $1.20 + $1.70 = $2.90. However, we need to divide this cost by the number of lamps, resulting in $2.90/2 = $1.45. Rounding it off, the per lamp replacement cost is $1.36.
To learn more about cost, click here:
brainly.com/question/14566816
#SPJ11
The New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) is cited as an example of how purely competitive firms operate. The Glass-Steagall Act is one example of how purely competitive firms may be regulated. What affect do you conclude strengthening of regulatory instruments such as Glass-Steagall may have had relative to avoiding the financial meltdown that had beginning roots in the last years of the Clinton Administration? Provide specific examples (and citations) to support your views and explain your reasoning.
The Glass-Steagall Act was a financial regulation that was enacted in 1933, following the Great Depression. It separated commercial and investment banking by prohibiting banks from engaging in both activities at the same time. The New York Stock Exchange is an example of how purely competitive firms operate.
The following is a discussion of how strengthening regulatory instruments such as Glass-Steagall may have contributed to avoiding the financial crisis that had its origins in the last years of the Clinton Administration. The financial crisis of 2008 was one of the worst in history. The financial crisis began in 2007, but its roots go back to the last years of the Clinton Administration, when deregulation was at an all-time high. The deregulation of the financial sector had begun in the 1980s and continued throughout the 1990s. The repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act in 1999 was the final blow to financial regulation.
The Glass-Steagall Act had separated commercial and investment banking. This separation prevented banks from engaging in risky activities. However, the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act allowed banks to engage in risky activities such as derivatives trading and subprime lending. The result was a financial crisis that spread throughout the world. The financial crisis of 2008 could have been avoided if the regulatory instruments such as the Glass-Steagall Act had been strengthened. The Glass-Steagall Act was designed to protect consumers from risky financial products and services. By separating commercial and investment banking, the Glass-Steagall Act prevented banks from engaging in risky activities that could jeopardize the financial system. The financial crisis of 2008 was a result of the deregulation of the financial sector. The repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act allowed banks to engage in risky activities that led to the financial crisis. If the regulatory instruments such as the Glass-Steagall Act had been strengthened, the financial crisis could have been avoided.
To know more about the investment, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30529793
#SPJ11
List the
components or "building blocks" of market (nominal) interest
rates. Which of
these components would not apply to the rates on U.S. Government
securities, and why not?
The component that does not apply to the rates on U.S. Government securities is the default risk premium.
The components or "building blocks" of market (nominal) interest rates include:
Real interest rate: This is the baseline rate that reflects the true cost of borrowing or the return on investment, adjusted for inflation. It represents the compensation lenders or investors require for forgoing current consumption or other investment opportunities.
Inflation expectations: Anticipated changes in the general price level affect interest rates. Higher inflation expectations lead to higher interest rates to compensate for the erosion of purchasing power.
Risk premium: Investors demand an additional return to compensate for the riskiness of an investment. Riskier assets or borrowers tend to have higher interest rates.
Liquidity premium: Less liquid assets or markets may require higher interest rates to attract investors who value liquidity.
Default risk premium: Borrowers with a higher probability of defaulting on their obligations must pay higher interest rates to compensate lenders for the risk of non-payment.
To learn more about the risk premium
https://brainly.com/question/23969100
#SPJ8
How long will it take an investment of $100 to double in value
if it earns 6.3 % compounded quarterly? Express your answer in
YEARS, and to two decimal places.
It will take approximately 11.02 years for an investment of $100 to double in value if it earns 6.3% compounded quarterly.
To determine the time it takes for an investment to double, we can use the formula for compound interest:
A = P(1 + r/n)^(nt)
Where:
A = Final amount (in this case, twice the initial investment)
P = Principal amount (initial investment)
r = Annual interest rate (6.3% = 0.063)
n = Number of times the interest is compounded per year (quarterly = 4 times)
t = Time in years
Since we want the investment to double, the final amount (A) will be twice the initial investment (2P). Plugging the values into the formula, we have:
2P = P(1 + 0.063/4)^(4t)
Dividing both sides by P, we get:
2 = (1 + 0.063/4)^(4t)
Taking the natural logarithm (ln) of both sides to solve for t, we have:
ln(2) = ln[(1 + 0.063/4)^(4t)]
Using the property of logarithms, we can bring down the exponent:
ln(2) = 4t * ln(1 + 0.063/4)
Now, we can solve for t by dividing both sides by 4 times the natural logarithm of (1 + 0.063/4):
t = ln(2) / (4 * ln(1 + 0.063/4))
Using a calculator, we can evaluate this expression:
t ≈ 11.02 years
Therefore, it will take approximately 11.02 years for the investment of $100 to double in value with a 6.3% annual interest rate compounded quarterly.
To learn more about investment click here:
brainly.com/question/17252319
#SPJ11
The spot rate for Mexican pesos is Ps20.37/s. If you buy Ps17205 spot from its bank on Monday. how much mustyou pay and on what date?
If you buy Ps17205 spot from its bank on Monday, then you must pay $351,063.85 on Monday itself.
The amount you need to pay for buying Mexican pesos is calculated as follows:
Amount to be paid = Number of pesos bought x Spot rate
Amount to be paid = 17205 x 20.37
Amount to be paid = $351,063.85
Hence, the amount to be paid is $351,063.85 if you buy Ps17205 spot from its bank on Monday.
Now, let’s find out the date on which you will pay this amount.
The spot rate is the rate at which you buy or sell a currency for immediate delivery.
Therefore, you will have to pay this amount immediately. Hence, the payment date will be Monday itself.
To know more about spot visit :
brainly.com/question/32530463
#SPJ11
Consider the following information which relates to a closed economy without a government:
Consumption (C + cYd) : 375 + 0.6Yd
Investment (I) : 140
Full employment level of income (Yf) : 2 000
Q : Calculate the change in investment required to reach the full employment level of income.
To calculate the change in investment required to reach the full employment level of income in a closed economy without a government, we need to compare the desired level of income (Yf) with the current level of income (Y) and find the difference.
The desired level of income (Yf) is given as 2,000.
To find the current level of income (Y), we need to equate consumption (C + cYd) and investment (I) to total income (Y). From the given information, we know that consumption is 375 + 0.6Yd and investment is 140.
Equating consumption and investment to total income, we have:
375 + 0.6Yd + 140 = Y
Simplifying the equation, we get:
515 + 0.6Yd = Y
Now, we can substitute the value of Yf into the equation to find the current level of income (Y).
515 + 0.6Yd = 2,000
Solving for Yd, we find:
0.6Yd = 2,000 - 515
0.6Yd = 1,485
Yd = 1,485 / 0.6
Yd = 2,475
Substituting Yd back into the equation, we can find the current level of income (Y):
Y = 515 + 0.6(2,475)
Y = 515 + 1,485
Y = 2,000
Since the current level of income (Y) is already at the full employment level of income (Yf), there is no change in investment required to reach the full employment level of income.
Read more about investment here;https://brainly.com/question/29547577
#SPJ11
A CEO is considering how he wants this company to be positioned. He has though of it as the coolest brand and the brand with the best value. Which of the following is true about his predicamnet?
a. He can probably achieve either of these goals, but not both.
b. He cannot position it as the coolest brand
c. He cannot position it is the brand with the best value.
d. He can achieve both of these goals
The correct answer is option d.
The CEO can achieve both of these goals.
Explanation:If the CEO is considering how he wants this company to be positioned and has thought of it as the coolest brand and the brand with the best value. The two goals are not mutually exclusive, and it is possible to achieve both simultaneously.
This is because both the coolest brand and the brand with the best value can appeal to different customer segments. The coolest brand might appeal to younger people while the brand with the best value could appeal to a more frugal consumer base.
As a result, the company's products and advertising can be tailored to appeal to both audiences. Thus, the CEO can achieve both of these goals and make his company's brand popular among the cool generation while also attracting consumers looking for value for their money.
To know more about CEO visit
https://brainly.com/question/33246556
#SPJ11
Tour Submission: Started on May 27 at 11: Imagine you run the installation department for an oak handrail company. You've noticed that installation is taking longer than the time you are promising to customers. By observing your installers in the field for two weeks, you collect the following data. Use a Pareto analysis to prioritize your improvement initiatives. What are your "vital few problems? What would you do to improve the installation process? Type of Problem Frequency 2 Broken equipment Missing necessary components 18 Sick employees 3 Wrong material delivered to job site Scheduling conflicts House locked/no one home when promised M 14 Format Font A a 4 7 1
The Pareto analysis of the installation department data reveals the following vital few problems: Missing necessary components (18 occurrences), Scheduling conflicts (14 occurrences)
Broken equipment (7 occurrences)
To improve the installation process, the following steps can be taken:
Missing necessary components: Implement a robust inventory management system to ensure all required components are readily available, and establish clear communication channels with suppliers to prevent shortages.
Scheduling conflicts: Improve communication with customers to gather accurate scheduling information, utilize scheduling software to optimize appointments, and establish protocols for handling unforeseen conflicts.
Broken equipment: Conduct regular maintenance and inspections of tools and equipment, establish a reporting system for damaged or malfunctioning items, and ensure timely repairs or replacements.
By addressing these vital few problems, the installation department can streamline operations, reduce delays, and enhance overall efficiency.
Learn more about Pareto analysis here: brainly.com/question/31489642
#SPJ11
Write the expressions for the following models: AR(2), MA(2),
ARMA(2,1), ARIMA(1, 1, 2).
Time series models are statistical models that are used to evaluate and forecast time series data. Time series data are the type of data that has been collected sequentially over time. There are several time series models available, and these models differ from each other based on their components and their purposes.
AR(2) modelAn AR(2) model can be written as: xt
= μ + φ1xt-1+ φ2xt-2+ et MA(2) model A MA(2) model can be written as: xt
= μ + et + θ1et-1+ θ2et-2
= μ + φ1xt-1+ φ2xt-2+ et + θ1et-1Where xt is the current period, xt-1 and xt-2 are the lags of the time series. et-1 is the first lag of the error term. et is the error term, μ is the mean of the time series. φ1 and φ2 are the autoregressive coefficients, and θ1 is the moving average coefficient. ARIMA(1,1,2) model An ARIMA(1,1,2) model can be written as: (1- φ1B)(1- B)xt= μ+ et + (1 + θ1B + θ2B2)et
To know more about coefficient visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1594145
#SPJ11
Q.1. Two firms produce homogeneous products. The inverse demand function is given by: p(x₁, x₂) = 80x₁-x2, where x₁ is the quantity chosen by firm 1 and x₂ the quantity chosen simultaneously by firm 2. the cost function of firm 2 is c2(x2) = 20x2 . the cost function of firm 1 is c1(x1) = 15 with probability of 0.5 . Identify the static bayesian nash equilibrium.
"
The static Bayesian Nash equilibrium in this scenario is when firm 1 chooses a quantity of x1 = 5 and firm 2 chooses a quantity of x2 = 10.
In a Bayesian game, players have private information that affects their decision-making. Firm 1 has a cost function that can take two possible values with equal probability (0.5). To find the static Bayesian Nash equilibrium, we need to consider each player's best response given their information and the beliefs of the other players.
Firm 2's cost function is known to both firms, so Firm 2 will choose the quantity that minimizes its cost, which is x2 = 10. Firm 1, knowing that firm 2 will choose x2 = 10, will choose the quantity that maximizes its expected profit. Firm 1's expected profit is calculated by taking the weighted average of its profits under each possible cost value (0.5 * (80x1 - 20) + 0.5 x (80x1 - 15)). To maximize its expected profit, firm 1 chooses x1 = 5.
Therefore, the static Bayesian Nash equilibrium is reached when firm 1 chooses x1 = 5 and firm 2 chooses x2 = 10. This equilibrium represents the best response for each firm given their private information and the expected actions of the other firm.
Learn more about profits here:
https://brainly.com/question/32381738
#SPJ11
The King Codes on Corporate Governance have been the hallmark of Good Corporate Governance in South Africa since the release of KING I Report in 1994. KING IV was launched in November 2016 by the Institute of Directors of South Africa (IoDSA). The fundamental objective of KING IV is to ensure that corporates are well governed in South Africa. However, recently in December 2017 STEINHOFF, a company owned by one of South Africa’s richest men, Mr. Christo Wiese, found itself in a R89.44bn accounting scandal which has wiped out more than $10bn in market value following its disclosure of accounting irregularities, which forced former Chief Executive Markus Jooste to step down from his role. To make matters worse, the troubled retailer saw Moody’s rating agency downgrading its credit rating in December 2017 to CAA1 Corporate Family Rating, and on review for further downgrade. One of the objectives of KING IV is to "promote corporate governance as integral to running an organisation and delivering governance outcomes such as an ethical culture, good performance, effective control and legitimacy". How, in your view, should The National Treasury and the Financial Services Board (FSB) deal with this STEINHOFF fiasco to send a stern warning to all corporates that do not respect Good Corporate Governance.
The National Treasury and the Financial Services Board (FSB) should investigate, penalize, and strengthen regulations to send a stern warning against corporate governance violations like the STEINHOFF fiasco.
In order to send a stern warning to all corporates that do not respect Good Corporate Governance, The National Treasury and the Financial Services Board (FSB) should take decisive action in response to the STEINHOFF fiasco.
This should include conducting a thorough investigation into the accounting scandal, holding individuals accountable, imposing significant penalties for corporate governance violations, and implementing stronger regulatory measures to prevent similar occurrences in the future.
By taking these steps, the authorities can demonstrate their commitment to upholding good corporate governance and ensure that such failures are not tolerated in the South African business landscape.
learn more about financial here:
https://brainly.com/question/28319639
#SPJ11
This is a segment from PBS featuring Emily Oster. Oster is an Economics Professor at Brown. She makes many statements concerning the economics of childcare and parenting. Although there are many topics, she refers to consumer equilibrium in one section.
1. What activity does Oster refer to when she invokes marginal utility? +5 pts
2. If Oster is hypothesizing about equilibrium in this activity, which she is, what might be additional good/activities should she be including in her analysis? Although it is impossible to specify all goods, think of an additional good/activity upon which equilibrium could be based. +5 pts
3. Now examine your other good. What are the requirements for consumer equilibrium for Oster between you chosen good/activity, and the good/activity she specifies? Is it the same for Oster, as it is for other mothers/parents? Why or why not? +15 pts 4. Switching gears: A "mathematically fair bet" is one in which the amount won will on average equal the amount bet—for example, when a gambler bets $100 for a 10 percent chance to win $1,000 ($100 = 0.10 × $1,000). Assuming diminishing marginal utility of dollars, explain why this is not a fair bet in terms of utility. Why is it a more unfair fair bet when the "house" takes a cut of each dollar bet? Is gambling irrational? +8 pts
Marginal utility is a concept used in economics to measure the additional satisfaction or benefit derived from consuming one additional unit of a good or engaging in one additional activity.
It refers to the change in total utility resulting from a small change in the quantity consumed.
In the context of consumer equilibrium, additional goods/activities that could be included in the analysis depend on the specific situation being discussed. It could be any other goods or activities that individuals value and make decisions about, such as leisure activities, entertainment, household goods, or other services. The additional good/activity considered would vary based on the specific analysis and research question.
For consumer equilibrium, individuals aim to allocate their limited resources (time, money, etc.) to maximize their overall satisfaction or utility. This involves considering the trade-offs and making choices based on the relative prices and utilities of different goods/activities. The requirements for consumer equilibrium depend on individual preferences, budget constraints, and the prices of goods/activities.
Learn more about budget here:
https://brainly.com/question/31952035
#SPJ11
Cash flows from a new project are expected to be $6,000, $10,000, $18,000, and $25,000 over the next 4 years, respectively. Assuming and intial cost of $40,000 and a required return of 10%, what is the project's PI?
01.13
1.07
1.15
1.11
1.17
The project's PI is 1.07. To calculate the project's PI, the following steps can be followed:
1. Compute the present value of all future cash flows.
2. Find the initial cost.
3. Compute the Profitability Index by dividing the sum of the present values by the initial cost.
We are given the following values:
Cash flows from a new project are expected to be $6,000, $10,000, $18,000, and $25,000 over the next 4 years, respectively.
Initial cost = $40,000
Required return = 10%
Let us compute the present value of all future cash flows using the formula to calculate the present value of an annuity,
PV = C[(1 - (1 / (1 + r)^n)) / r].
Where, PV = Present Value, C = cash flow per period, r = discount rate, n = number of periods.
The present value of the cash flows over the next four years are as follows:
PV of $6,000 for 1 year = $5,454.55
PV of $10,000 for 2 years = $8,264.46
PV of $18,000 for 3 years = $12,815.12
PV of $25,000 for 4 years = $16,162.60
Total present value of all cash flows = $5,454.55 + $8,264.46 + $12,815.12 + $16,162.60 = $42,696.73
The Profitability Index can be calculated by dividing the total present value of all cash flows by the initial cost.
PI = Total present value of all cash flows / Initial cost
= $42,696.73 / $40,000= 1.07
Learn more about The Profitability Index: https://brainly.com/question/30641835
#SPJ11
Which of the following asset categories is NOT a part of M2 money? O other liquid assets small-denomination time deposits O bank reserves O demand deposits
M2 money refers to a measure of money supply that includes all the components of M1 money plus other liquid assets. Therefore, the asset category that is not a part of M2 money is bank reserves. M2 money supply can be defined as a measurement of the total amount of money that is in circulation in a particular economy at any given time.
In other words, M2 is the amount of money that is in circulation in an economy that includes all the components of M1 plus the near-money assets such as savings deposits, time deposits below $100,000, and non-institutional money market funds.Therefore, bank reserves are not included in M2 money because they are not available to be spent by the general public and are only kept by banks for their internal operations.
Bank reserves are deposits that banks hold at the Federal Reserve in excess of their required reserve levels, which are the minimum deposits banks must hold in order to meet regulatory requirements. The banks cannot lend out these reserves, and they do not contribute to the money supply or GDP. Thus, bank reserves are not included in M2 money.To summarize, bank reserves are not a part of the M2 money supply category, which comprises all components of M1 and other liquid assets.
To know more about components visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30324922
#SPJ11
Money leakages tend to _____ during recessions, causing the actual money multiplier to _____.
Money leakages tend to increase during recessions, causing the actual money multiplier to decrease.
Money leakages refer to factors that remove money from the economy and reduce the effectiveness of the money multiplier. They include saving, taxation, and imports. During recessions, several factors contribute to increased money leakages:
1. Increased Saving: During economic downturns, individuals and businesses tend to save more as they become cautious about their financial stability. Higher saving rates mean that a larger portion of income is not spent, reducing the amount of money circulating in the economy.
2. Reduced Investment: During recessions, businesses often reduce their investment activities due to decreased consumer demand and uncertain economic conditions. Reduced investment means that less money is spent on capital goods and business expansion, resulting in lower economic activity and a decrease in the money multiplier.
3. Lower Tax Revenue: Recessions often lead to lower tax revenue for governments. This reduces the amount of money available for public spending and investment, leading to reduced government expenditures and further decreasing the money multiplier.
4. Increased Imports: During recessions, domestic consumption may decline, leading to an increased reliance on imported goods. As money is spent on imports, it leaks out of the domestic economy and reduces the effectiveness of the money multiplier.
As money leakages increase during recessions, the actual money multiplier decreases. The money multiplier represents the potential expansion of the money supply through the fractional reserve banking system. However, during economic downturns, factors such as increased saving, reduced investment, lower tax revenue, and increased imports act as leakages, limiting the multiplier effect and reducing the overall impact of money creation on the economy.
Learn more about economy here:
https://brainly.com/question/30131108
#SPJ11
For each of the following, decide if they are included or excluded in this year's GDP. a) An auto mechanic who fixes their own vehicle at home. b) Cash received from selling a corporate bond. c) Spending by a city government on a waste water treatment plant. d) The purchase of a health care item by an individual.
Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is the total sum of all final goods and services produced within a country's borders during a particular period. GDP does not include all of a country's economic activities.
Here are the answers to your questions:a) An auto mechanic who fixes their own vehicle at home: Excluded
This is excluded because the auto mechanic is neither producing goods nor services that are exchanged in the market for value.
b) Cash received from selling a corporate bond: Excluded
This is excluded because it is not a final good or service. Corporate bonds are just a representation of a company's debt and are not a direct economic activity.
c) Spending by a city government on a waste water treatment plant: Included
This is included because it is an expenditure on the final goods and services that contribute to the economic growth and GDP of the country.
d) The purchase of a health care item by an individual: Included
This is included because it is a personal consumption expenditure that adds to the final goods and services produced in the country.
To know more on GDP visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31197617
#SPJ11
How do market economies ultimately determine what goods and services are produced, how the goods and services will be produced, and who will receive the goods and services?.
Market economies rely on the forces of supply and demand to ultimately determine what goods and services are produced, how they are produced, and who receives them.
In a market economy, the determination of what goods and services are produced, how they are produced, and who receives them is primarily driven by the forces of supply and demand. Here is a step-by-step explanation of how this process works:
1. Consumer Preferences: Market economies rely on consumers to express their preferences and needs through their purchasing decisions. This demand creates a signal for producers to allocate resources towards producing certain goods and services.
2. Profit Motive: Producers, motivated by profit, respond to consumer demand by producing goods and services that are in demand. They aim to maximize their profits by meeting consumer needs efficiently and effectively.
3. Competition: Market economies promote competition among producers. This competition encourages efficiency and innovation in production methods and product quality.
4. Pricing Mechanism: The prices of goods and services are determined by the interaction of supply and demand. Prices act as signals, conveying information about the scarcity of resources and the relative value consumers place on different products.
5. Resource Allocation: Based on consumer demand and the prices of goods and services, producers allocate resources to maximize their profits. This includes decisions about what goods and services to produce and how to produce them.
6. Income Distribution: The market economy determines who receives the goods and services through the income distribution process. Individuals with the purchasing power to afford the goods and services can access and consume them.
Learn more about supply
https://brainly.com/question/28285610
#SPJ11
Project Q is expected to produce and sell 3 million units per year, priced at $24.99. The costs of producing are estimated to be $17.08 per unit. The equipment and project will last for 4 years. Annual operating expenses are estimated to be $8 million per year. The initial cost of machinery for Project Q is $40 million and will last for 4 years. Calculate the Year 1 Incremental EBIT produced by Project Q.
Now, Project Q will require a $2 million increase in Net Working Capital that will be recovered at the end of Year 4. The tax rate for the firm considering Project Q is 25%. The WACC is 10%. Determine the NPV for Project Q. (Enter NPV in millions up to 2 decimal places or more)
The Year 1 Incremental EBIT for Project Q is $15.73 million. The NPV for Project Q is $11.52 million. This is calculated by subtracting the initial cost of $40 million from the present value of incremental EBIT and net working capital recovery over the project's four-year duration, discounted at a rate of 10% (the WACC). The incremental EBIT represents the earnings before interest and taxes in each year. The NPV represents the net present value of the project's cash flows, taking into account the initial investment, operating profits, and the time value of money. A positive NPV suggests that the project is expected to generate value for the firm.
To calculate the Year 1 Incremental EBIT (Earnings Before Interest and Taxes) for Project Q, we need to calculate the total revenues, total costs, and subtract the annual operating expenses.
Total revenues = Number of units sold * Price per unit
Total revenues = 3,000,000 * $24.99 = $74,970,000
Total costs = Number of units sold * Cost per unit
Total costs = 3,000,000 * $17.08 = $51,240,000
EBIT = Total revenues - Total costs - Operating expenses
EBIT = $74,970,000 - $51,240,000 - $8,000,000 = $15,730,000
Next, we can calculate the NPV (Net Present Value) for Project Q using the formula:
NPV = (-Initial Cost) + (Incremental EBIT / (1 + WACC)^1) + (Incremental EBIT / (1 + WACC)^2) + ... + (Incremental EBIT + Net Working Capital Recovery) / (1 + WACC)^n
Where:
Initial Cost = Cost of machinery
Incremental EBIT = EBIT for each year
WACC = Weighted Average Cost of Capital
n = Number of years
Given:
Initial Cost = $40,000,000
Incremental EBIT Year 1 = $15,730,000
Net Working Capital Recovery at Year 4 = $2,000,000
WACC = 10%
n = 4 years
Now, we can calculate the NPV:
NPV = (-$40,000,000) + ($15,730,000 / (1 + 0.10)^1) + ($15,730,000 / (1 + 0.10)^2) + ($15,730,000 / (1 + 0.10)^3) + ($15,730,000 / (1 + 0.10)^4) + ($2,000,000 / (1 + 0.10)^4)
Calculating the NPV, we get:
NPV = -$40,000,000 + $14,300,000 + $13,000,000 + $11,818,182 + $10,743,802 + $1,652,892 = $11,515,876
Therefore, the NPV for Project Q is $11.52 million.
To know more about EBIT, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28120822
#SPJ11
Explain the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and discuss its limitations. State reasons why the model has been important in investment decision making, despite such limitations. You are also required to provide definition and explanation of at least three alternative investment performance measurement approaches derived from the CAPM and discuss how those successors are differentiated from the predecessor.
The Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) is a popular model that is used to determine the expected return of a particular investment based on its level of risk.
It is based on the concept that the return on an investment is a function of the risk-free rate of return, the risk premium, and the beta of the investment. Beta measures the systematic risk of a stock or portfolio in relation to the overall market. The formula for the CAPM is as follows:
Expected Return = Risk-Free Rate + (Beta x Market Risk Premium)
There are several limitations to the CAPM, including the following:It assumes that investors are rational and risk-averse, and that they are seeking to maximize their expected return for a given level of risk. This is not always the case in the real world, as some investors may be more risk-tolerant than others.It assumes that all investors have the same expectations for future returns, which is also not always the case in the real world.It assumes that markets are efficient, meaning that all relevant information is immediately reflected in stock prices.
The importance of the CAPM in investment decision making- Despite its limitations, the CAPM has been an important model in investment decision making because it provides a systematic way of estimating the expected return on an investment. It is a simple model that is easy to understand and apply, and it is widely used by investors and financial analysts. In addition, it provides a benchmark against which the performance of an investment can be measured.
There are several alternative investment performance measurement approaches that have been derived from the CAPM, including the following:1. Fama-French Three-Factor ModelThe Fama-French Three-Factor Model is an extension of the CAPM that takes into account the size and value factors. The model includes three factors: the market risk premium, the size premium, and the value premium. The size premium is based on the idea that small-cap stocks have historically outperformed large-cap stocks, while the value premium is based on the idea that value stocks have historically outperformed growth stocks.
2. Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT)Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT) is another alternative investment performance measurement approach that is based on the idea that the expected return on an investment is a function of several risk factors, rather than just one. The APT includes multiple factors, such as inflation, interest rates, and economic growth.
3. Multi-Factor Models- Multi-Factor Models are a class of models that include more than one factor in the calculation of expected returns. These models are designed to capture more of the systematic risk of an investment than the CAPM. They may include factors such as interest rates, inflation, and macroeconomic variables.
To know more about CAPM visit-
brainly.com/question/32991386
#SPJ11
Suppose you plan to buy a house. You made a 10% down payment of $50,000 and took outa mortgage loan of $450,000 to pay for the remaining amount. The original terms called for 30 years of monthly payments at a 9% APR with the first payment due one month after you purchase the house. Ten years later, you got promoted, and your income increased. You now decide to make larger mortgage payments of $4,700. How long will you have to continue making payments to pay off your entire mortgage? a. 112 months b. 138 months c. 285 months d. 188 months e. None of the above
Given:
Down payment = 10% of total cost of the house = $50,000
Mortgage loan amount = $450,000
Term = 30 years
Interest rate = 9% APR (Annual Percentage Rate)
Payments = Monthly
First payment due = One month after purchase of house
After 10 years, new mortgage payments = $4,700
Step-by-step solution:
Calculate the total cost of the house:
The down payment is 10% of the total cost of the house.
So, 10% of the cost of the house = $50,000
Or, the cost of the house = $50,000 x 10 = $500,000
The total cost of the house is $500,000.
Calculate the monthly interest rate and the number of payments per year:
The annual interest rate is 9%.
So, the monthly interest rate is 9% / 12 = 0.75%.
The payments are monthly, so the number of payments per year is 12.
Calculate the original monthly payment:
Using the formula for the present value of an annuity, we can find the original monthly payment.
PV = PMT x (1 - (1 + r/n)^(-nt)) / (r/n)
Here, PV = $450,000, PMT is the original monthly payment, r is the annual interest rate (0.09), n is the number of times interest is compounded per year (12), and t is the time in years (30).
Substituting the values, we get:
$450,000 = PMT x (1 - (1 + 0.09/12)^(-12*30)) / (0.09/12)
This equation can be solved for PMT using a financial calculator or a spreadsheet software. The original monthly payment comes out to be $3,620 (rounded off to the nearest dollar).
Calculate the remaining time to pay off the mortgage:
After ten years, the borrower decides to make larger monthly payments of $4,700. We can use the present value of an annuity formula again to find the remaining time to pay off the mortgage.
PV = PMT x (1 - (1 + r/n)^(-nt)) / (r/n)
Here, PV = $450,000, PMT = $4,700, r = 0.09, n = 12, and we need to find t.
Substituting the values, we get:
$450,000 = $4,700 x (1 - (1 + 0.09/12)^(-12t)) / (0.09/12)
This equation can be solved for t using a financial calculator or a spreadsheet software. The value of t comes out to be approximately 11.8 years (rounded off to the nearest tenth of a year).
To know more about financial calculator visit :
https://brainly.com/question/29103302
#SPJ11
Sales from MOCI companies at the end of 2021 were recorded at $ 101,000. COGS is $78,000. The net income the company made is $ 50,000. The company's total assets are $ 130,000. Company liabilities consist of Accounts Payable of $ 20,000, Accrued Payable of $ 4,000, and Long-Term Liabilities of $ 5,000 used to purchase fixed assets. Suppose the company distributes dividends of $ 13,000 and has beginning equity of $ 60,000. Calculate the company's sustainable growth and Additional Funds Needed for 2022. Based on your calculation, analyze the company's financial future conditions. Calculate the company's sustainable growth and Additional Funds Needed for 2022. Based on your calculation, analyze the company's financial future conditions.
Based on the calculation, it is analyzed that the sustainable growth rate of the company is 61.32%. It implies that the company's financial future conditions are good, and the company can increase its sales by 61.32%. However, the additional funds needed for 2022 are $17,200.
The solution to the problem is:
Sustainable Growth rate = Retention Rate x Return on Equity
Where,
Retention Rate = (Net Income - Dividend) / Net Income
Return on Equity (ROE) = Net Income / Equity
Additional Funds Needed (AFN) = (Total Asset – Total Liability and Equity) × (Projected Sales increase – Projected increase in spontaneous Liabilities) – Increase in retained earnings
Sustainable growth rate
Retentions rate = (50,000 - 13,000) / 50,000 = 0.74
ROE = 50,000 / 60,000 = 0.83
Sustainable Growth rate = 0.74 × 0.83 = 0.6132 or 61.32%
Additional Funds Needed for 2022
Total Liabilities and equity = 60,000 + 20,000 + 4,000 + 5,000 = $ 89,000
Total Assets = $130,000
AFN = ($130,000 - $89,000) × (1 - 0.74) - ($50,000 × (1 - 0.74))
AFN = $17,200
Learn more about Return on Equity (ROE): https://brainly.com/question/30403915
#SPJ11
You are planning on acquiring a machine for a business that you have just started. The machine costs $35,000 and you can get a 5 year term loan at 10%; the principal amount will be paid at the end of the five years. The machine will be depreciated at a rate of $6,000 every year. At the end of 5 years, the machine will have a value of $5,000. The manufacturer of the equipment is willing to lease the machine for $8,000 a year, with lease payments due at the end of the year. If the firm leases it will acquire the machine for $5,000 at the end of 5 years. This cost of $5000 already accounts for related future depreciation tax savings. The tax rate for your business is 35%. Should you buy or lease? What is the cost of buying? What is the Cost of leasing? What is the NAL?
Based on the given information, the business should lease the machine as it results in a lower net cost compared to buying.
The cost of buying the machine can be calculated by considering the initial cost, annual depreciation, and the salvage value. The cost of buying is the sum of the initial cost ($35,000), the annual depreciation tax savings (35% of $6,000 per year for 5 years), and the salvage value ($5,000).
On the other hand, the cost of leasing the machine is the total lease payments ($8,000 per year for 5 years). To determine the Net Advantage to Leasing (NAL), we compare the present value of the costs of buying and leasing.
This involves discounting the future cash flows using the appropriate discount rate. Since the loan interest rate is not provided, we'll assume it to be the same as the discount rate.
By calculating the present value of the costs associated with buying and leasing and comparing them, the NAL can be determined. If the NAL is positive, it indicates that leasing is more advantageous, whereas a negative NAL favors buying.
To provide an accurate calculation of the cost of buying, cost of leasing, and NAL, we would need the loan interest rate or the discount rate.
learn more about business here:
https://brainly.com/question/29896340
#SPJ11
Based on the given information, you should lease the machine as it results in a lower net advantage than buying. The cost of buying the machine is $35,000, the cost of leasing is $40,000 ($8,000 per year for 5 years), and the Net Advantage to Leasing (NAL) is negative, indicating that buying is more costly than leasing.
To determine the cost of buying, we need to consider the initial cost of the machine ($35,000) and the depreciation expense ($6,000 per year for 5 years). Thus, the cost of buying is $35,000 + ($6,000 × 5) = $65,000.
For leasing, the annual lease payment is $8,000, which is paid for 5 years. Additionally, at the end of 5 years, there is a cost of $5,000 to acquire the machine.
This cost of $5,000 already accounts for the related future depreciation tax savings. Therefore, the total cost of leasing is $8,000 × 5 + $5,000 = $45,000.
To compare buying and leasing, we calculate the Net Advantage to Leasing (NAL). NAL is determined by subtracting the cost of buying from the cost of leasing, and then considering the tax savings.
The tax savings are calculated by multiplying the depreciation expense ($6,000) by the tax rate (35%) for each year.
NAL = (Cost of Leasing - Cost of Buying) + Tax Savings
Tax Savings = (Depreciation Expense × Tax Rate) × Number of Years
Using the given information, we can calculate the NAL to determine the more cost-effective option. If the NAL is positive, buying is more advantageous, and if the NAL is negative, leasing is more advantageous.
Based on the provided information, the NAL is negative, indicating that leasing is more cost-effective than buying the machine.
learn more about leasing here:
https://brainly.com/question/32790271
#SPJ11
orin, a citizen of ohio, sees an ad for power up! in extreme!!! magazine and buys it in ohio at a local store. within 2 hours of drinking power up! orin suffers internal injuries. alleging th
It is important for Orin to consult with an attorney to fully understand their rights and options in pursuing this claim.
Based on the given information, Orin, a citizen of Ohio, purchased Power Up! in Extreme!!! magazine from a local store in Ohio. Shortly after consuming the drink, Orin experiences internal injuries. In order to address this situation, Orin would need to file a legal claim against the responsible party, which would typically be the manufacturer of Power Up!.
To proceed with the legal claim, Orin should follow these steps:
1. Gather evidence: Orin should collect any relevant evidence, such as receipts, medical records, and witness statements, to support their claim.
2. Consult an attorney: Orin should seek the advice of a personal injury attorney who specializes in product liability cases. The attorney can assess the case and determine the best course of action.
3. File a complaint: Orin, together with their attorney, should file a complaint against the manufacturer of Power Up! in the appropriate court. The complaint should detail the injuries sustained and allege negligence or product defect as the cause.
4. Discovery and negotiation: Both parties will engage in the discovery process, where they exchange relevant information and evidence. Settlement negotiations may occur during this stage.
5. Trial or settlement: If the case does not settle, it will proceed to trial. Orin's attorney will present evidence and arguments to prove the manufacturer's liability. Alternatively, if a settlement is reached, the case will be resolved outside of court.
Learn more about rights
https://brainly.com/question/33848509
#SPJ11
Complete question is here
Orin, a citizen of Ohio, sees an ad for Power Up! in Extreme!!! magazine and buys it in Ohio at a local store. Within 2 hours of drinking Power Up!, Orin suffers internal injuries. Alleging that Power Up! caused his injuries, can Orin file a lawsuit against Quik Results, Inc., the manufacturer of Power Up!, in an Ohio state court?
Role of marketing in society in education industry to eradicate poverty. (relate to UN Sustainable Development Goals (500 - 600 words) NO PLAGIARISM
The role of marketing in the education industry is crucial in eradicating poverty and aligns with the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Marketing plays a significant role in promoting educational opportunities, ensuring access to quality education, and addressing poverty-related challenges.
1. Creating awareness: Marketing helps raise awareness about the importance of education in breaking the cycle of poverty. It promotes the value of education by highlighting its benefits and its role in socioeconomic development.
2. Targeting marginalized communities: Marketing can specifically target marginalized communities to ensure that educational opportunities are accessible to everyone, regardless of their socioeconomic background. This inclusivity helps address poverty by providing equal access to education.
3. Promoting scholarships and financial aid: Marketing efforts can focus on promoting scholarships and financial aid programs, making education more affordable for students from disadvantaged backgrounds. By reducing financial barriers, these initiatives help alleviate poverty by enabling individuals to pursue higher education.
4. Encouraging vocational and skills-based training: Marketing campaigns can emphasize the importance of vocational and skills-based training to address poverty. By promoting these types of education, marketing can help individuals acquire the necessary skills to secure better job opportunities, leading to improved socioeconomic conditions.
5. Engaging with stakeholders: Marketing in the education industry involves engaging with various stakeholders, including governments, NGOs, and communities. Collaborative efforts can help identify poverty-related challenges and develop strategies to overcome them. Marketing can facilitate partnerships that result in targeted initiatives to address poverty through education.
6. Advocating for policy changes: Marketing can play a role in advocating for policy changes that support poverty eradication through education. By raising awareness about the importance of education in reducing poverty, marketing campaigns can influence policymakers to allocate resources and prioritize educational initiatives.
7. Leveraging technology: Marketing can harness the power of technology to reach a wider audience and provide educational opportunities in underserved areas. Online platforms, digital marketing, and e-learning solutions can help bridge the educational gap and empower individuals in poverty-stricken communities.
8. Monitoring and evaluation: Marketing can contribute to poverty eradication by monitoring and evaluating the impact of educational initiatives. By assessing the effectiveness of different programs and campaigns, marketing can identify areas for improvement and ensure resources are utilized efficiently.
In conclusion, the role of marketing in the education industry is vital in eradicating poverty. By creating awareness, targeting marginalized communities, promoting scholarships and financial aid, encouraging vocational training, engaging stakeholders, advocating for policy changes, leveraging technology, and monitoring progress, marketing can contribute significantly to achieving the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goal of eradicating poverty through education.
Know more about marketing here:
https://brainly.com/question/27155256
#SPJ11
semi-annual compounding? A. Sufficient information not provided. B. $1000 C. $990 D. $1085
In semi-annual compounding, the correct option is A. Sufficient information not provided.
In semi-annual compounding interest is compounded twice a year. To calculate the future value, we can use the formula:
Future Value = Principal * (1 + (Interest Rate / Number of Compounding Periods))^(Number of Compounding Periods * Number of Years)
In this case, the principal (initial investment) is not provided, so we cannot calculate the exact future value. However, we can explain the steps to calculate it.
Let's assume the principal is $1000 and the interest rate is not given. Using the formula, the future value after one year would be:
Future Value = $1000 * (1 + (Interest Rate / 2))^2
To find the interest rate, we would need additional information. Since the interest rate is not provided, we cannot calculate the future value accurately.
Therefore, the correct answer would be A. Sufficient information not provided.
learn more about semi-annual compounding from this link.
https://brainly.com/question/33801058
#SPJ11
Required information M & M Proposition I, with Taxes Lollipop Corp.provides the following information: EBIT = $286.50,Tax (TC )= 35%Debt= $810,Cost of debt capital = 10%,RU = 15% What is the value of the firm? $1,241.53,$1,050.72,$1,784.03,$1,525.03$1,654.91.
The Taxes Lollipop Corp company’s value (V) is found to be $1,525.03.
The formula for the WACC is expressed as follows:
WACC = (E/V × Re) + [(D/V × Rd) × (1 − TC)]
Where:E = market value of the firm’s equity
D = market value of the firm’s debt
V = E + D
Re = cost of equity
Rd = cost of debt
TC = corporate tax rate
The market value of the firm (V) can be calculated using the following formula:
V = E + D
Here,EBIT = $286.50,
Tax (TC )= 35%
Debt= $810,
Cost of debt capital = 10%,
RU = 15%
Given values:
Debt (D) = $810
Cost of debt capital (Rd) = 10%
Tax rate (TC) = 35%
Cost of equity (Re) = 15%
Here,V = E + D,
therefore
E = V - DEBIT = $286.50,
Therefore,
Net operating income (EBIT) = $286.50
Tax (TC )= 35%
Therefore,After-tax operating income (EBIT (1 - TC)) = $186.23
The company’s value (V) can now be calculated using the following formula:
V = E + D = EBIT (1 - TC) / WACC
V = (EBIT (1 - TC) / WACC) + D
Now, we need to calculate WACC
WACC = (E/V × Re) + [(D/V × Rd) × (1 − TC)]
WACC = [($715.03 / $1,525.03) × 0.15] + [($810.00 / $1,525.03) × 0.10 × (1 - 0.35)]
WACC = 0.0989 or 9.89%
V = (EBIT (1 - TC) / WACC) + D
= [($286.50 × (1 - 0.35)) / 0.0989] + $810.00
V = $1,525.03
Know more about the WACC
https://brainly.com/question/30746642
#SPJ11
Which is an example of someone who is fooled by money illusion in a certain country with a 4% inflation rate? An employee thinks she can buy 2% more goods and services after receiving a 6% raise. An employee thinks he can buy 7% more goods and services after receiving a 7% raise. A saver thinks he is earning a 1% real return on savings that earns 5% interest. OA saver thinks she is losing purchasing power on savings that earns 3% interest.
The example of someone who is fooled by money illusion in a certain country with a 4% inflation rate is:
A saver who thinks he is earning a 1% real return on savings that earns 5% interest.
In this case, the saver is earning a nominal interest rate of 5% on their savings. However, the inflation rate is 4%, meaning the purchasing power of their savings is eroded by 4% annually. Therefore, their real return, which takes into account inflation, is only 1% (5% - 4%). This individual is deceived by the nominal interest rate and fails to recognize that their savings are actually losing purchasing power in real terms.
This example highlights the importance of considering real values adjusted for inflation rather than solely relying on nominal values. Money illusion can lead individuals to misunderstand their true financial position and make incorrect assumptions about their purchasing power or returns on investments.
Learn more about inflation rate here:
https://brainly.com/question/19263433
#SPJ11
Edgar, who is a driver for Uber and earns per hour, is considering going to see a movie tonight. The cost to see a movie is , and Edgar would have to take hours off to see the movie.
A) What is the monetary cost for Edgar to see the movie?
B) What is the opportunity cost for Edgar to see the movie?
A) The monetary cost for Edgar to see the movie is $28.
B) The opportunity cost for Edgar to see the movie is $40.
A) Monetary cost for Edgar to see the movieThe monetary cost of Edgar going to see a movie can be calculated using the amount he earns per hour and the number of hours he will have to take off to see the movie.The cost to see the movie is $14.Edgar earns per hour.To calculate the monetary cost of seeing the movie, we need to multiply the cost of the movie by the number of hours Edgar will have to take off:$14 x 2 hours = $28
Therefore, the monetary cost for Edgar to see the movie is $28.
B) Opportunity cost for Edgar to see the movieOpportunity cost refers to the loss of potential gain from other alternatives when one alternative is chosen. In this case, the opportunity cost for Edgar to see the movie would be the amount of money he could have earned if he had not taken the two hours off to see the movie.The opportunity cost of seeing the movie is the amount of money Edgar would have earned if he had not taken two hours off to see the movie.
To calculate the opportunity cost, we need to multiply Edgar's hourly wage by the number of hours he could have worked instead of seeing the movie.Edgar earns per hour.Edgar takes 2 hours off to see the movie. So the opportunity cost of seeing the movie would be:$20 x 2 hours = $40
Therefore, the opportunity cost for Edgar to see the movie is $40.
for more such question on opportunity cost
https://brainly.com/question/30726111
#SPJ8
The Union of Jazz Dancers, Pastry Chefs and Nuclear Technicians is attempting to organize J.C.’s House of Pancakes. J.C., the owner, has told Christy, one of the waitresses and a union activist, that he doesn’t oppose unions in theory, but he’s concerned about the cost of business in a unionized shop, especially when profit margins are so thin in the restaurant industry. He tells the workers is concerned that if the restaurant unionizes, this will eat in to the thin margins, and he might be forced to close shop. During the middle of the drive, the minimum wage goes up by $1.50. J.C. raises the wages of all his staff, who already make more than the minimum wage, by $1.50 saying "I just want to be fair." Have any unfair labour practises occurred here?
Based on the given information, it does not appear that any unfair labor practices have occurred in this scenario.
J.C., the owner of J.C.'s House of Pancakes, expresses concerns about the potential cost of unionization and the impact on the restaurant's thin profit margins. However, he does not explicitly oppose the union and states that he is worried about the financial implications. When the minimum wage increases, J.C. voluntarily raises the wages of all his staff, including those already making more than the minimum wage, by $1.50, claiming fairness.
J.C.'s actions of raising wages for all staff, even if they were already making more than the minimum wage, can be seen as a proactive measure to ensure that his employees continue to be fairly compensated in light of the minimum wage increase. This gesture demonstrates a willingness to address concerns about fairness and is not considered an unfair labor practice.
However, it's important to note that this scenario provides limited information, and a comprehensive analysis of labor practices would require considering additional factors such as employee rights, working conditions, and the employer's overall treatment of the unionization effort.
Learn more about unfair labor here:
https://brainly.com/question/31799248
#SPJ11
A firm just paid a dividend of $4.38. The dividend is expected
to grow at a constant rate of 2.88% forever and the required rate
of return is 10.10%. What is the value of the stock?
To calculate the value of the stock, we can use the Gordon Growth Model formula.
The formula is, Value of stock = Dividend / (Required rate of return - Growth rate). Using the given information, the dividend is $4.38, the growth rate is 2.88%, and the required rate of return is 10.10%. Plugging these values into the formula, Value of stock = $4.38 / (10.10% - 2.88%). Simplifying the equation, Value of stock = $4.38 / 7.22%
Calculating the value, Value of stock = $4.38 / 0.0722 Value of stock ≈ $60.63. Therefore, the value of the stock is approximately $60.63.
Know more about value of the stock:
https://brainly.com/question/14176910
#SPJ11