Answer:
Basically, what the statement is saying is that the constituents of a government are it's most valuable resource, and nothing is more important than that resource. The social contract is the implicit agreement between the government and the people saying that if the people follow laws and work together for societal benefits, it is the responsibility of the government to protect them. This Reflects the idea of the social contract because the government's most valuable resource is its people, and under the social contract, if they follow laws, it is the government's responsibility to protect them and their rights. As for how the social contract protects people's rights, if the constituents follow laws and contribute towards the development of society, it is the governments responsibility to protect their rights.
True or false ? : Suspension is a positive form of punishment that Youth Court uses very
frequently
in the plessy vs. ferguson , do you agree with the decision of the case? explain why or why not
pls helppppppp its a summary law
Answer:
I do not agree with the decision of the case. The "separate but equal" was a lie. The blacks were still separate, and not equal at all.
Resources- DO NOT COPY AND PASTE PLEASE:
Essential Question of the Case:
Is Louisiana's law requiring racial segregation on its trains an unconstitutional violation of the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?
Background
In 1890, Louisiana passed a law called the Separate Car Act. This law said that railroad companies must provide separate but equal train cars for whites and blacks. Blacks had to sit with blacks and whites had to sit with whites. This act of separating people based on race is called segregation. Anyone who broke this law would have to pay a $25 fine or go to jail for 20 days.
Two groups of people wanted to challenge the constitutionality of the Separate Car Act. A group of black citizens who raised money to reverse the law worked together with the East Louisiana Railroad Company, which sought to end the Act mainly because of business and money reasons. They chose a 30-year-old shoemaker named Homer Plessy, a U.S. citizen who was one-eighth black and a Louisiana resident. On June 7, 1892, Plessy purchased a first-class ticket from New Orleans to Covington, Louisiana and sat in the railroad car for "White" passengers. The railroad officials knew Plessy was coming and arrested him for violating the Separate Car Act.
Plessy argued in court that the Separate Car Act violated the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution. The Thirteenth Amendment banned slavery and the Fourteenth Amendment requires that the government treat people equally. John Howard Ferguson, the judge hearing the case, had stated in a previous court decision that the Separate Car Act was unconstitutional if applied to trains running outside of Louisiana. In this case, however, he declared that the law was constitutional for trains running within the state and found Plessy guilty. Plessy appealed the case to the Louisiana State Supreme Court, which agreed that the Louisiana law was constitutional. Plessy then took his case, Plessy v. Ferguson, to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Constitutional Principles Related to the Case
Landmark U.S. Supreme Court Case Study
Plessy v. Ferguson | 1896 | Page Two
Decision & Impact
In a 7-1 decision, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Ferguson. The majority rejected Plessy’s Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendment arguments and instead agreed with the idea of “separate but equal.”
The majority, in an opinion written by Associate Justice Henry Billings Brown, supported state based racial segregation. The justices based their decision on the idea of “separate but equal;” that separate facilities for blacks and whites did not conflict with the Fourteenth Amendment as long as they were equal. (The phrase, "separate but equal" was not part of the opinion.)
Justice Brown agreed that the 14th amendment intended to establish absolute equality for the races before the law. He identified that the purpose of the Fourteenth Amendment as “enforce[ing] the absolute equality of the two races before the law,” but then argued that “it could not have been intended to abolish [end] distinctions based upon color, or to enforce social…equality.” According to the Court, the Fourteenth Amendment was only concerned with legal equality, the idea that everyone is equal in the eyes of the law.
Separate but equal is based on the idea that the facilities are kept in equal condition. However, this was not generally the case. The Plessy v. Ferguson decision impacted public institutions immediately. For example, education funding was often much less for African American schools, than for white schools. TThe Plessy v. Ferguson decision greatly impacted society. The idea of “separate but equal” led to racial segregation and states began creating “separate but equal” spaces in public places. his decision led to places in society that were separate, but not equal.
Probation is effective at preventing a return to crime when
A) higher fines are imposed
B) criminals are harshly punished
C) there are enough resources to provide probation services properly
D) criminals are religious
Answer:
a.) higher fines are imposed
Explanation:
Probation is effective at preventing a return to crime when higher fines are being imposed.
What do you mean by Probation?Probation refers to the process of testing or observing the character or abilities of a person who is new to a role or any job.
Probation is effective at preventing a return to crime when higher fines are imposed.
Therefore, A is the correct option.
Learn more about probation here:
https://brainly.com/question/12711873
#SPJ2
Officer Jax was new on the job. He saw a man dressed all in black sneak in to an apartment through the front door. Jax followed him and busted
down the door. He grabbed the man in black and yelled, "Got ya', you crook!" The man lived there and was quietly entering the apartment, because
his wife, who was a nurse and had worked the night shift, was still asleep. Jax violated the man's rights against unreasonable searches and
seizures guaranteed by which Amendment?
the Fifth Amendment
O the Eighth Amendment
the Fourth Amendment
O the Sixth Amendment
Answer:
The Fourth Amendment.
From the Constitution:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
I hope this helped!
Many companies around the world have been convicted of corporate crimes. Why do you think companies engage in illegal activities? What do you think society should do to curb corporate crime?
Answer:
Many companies engage in illegal activities with the intention of bettering themselves. I think that society should pay more attention to corporations and how they get successful.
Explanation:
Which form of government insurance provides assistance to people who become injured on their jobs?
1, Medicare
2, social security
3, unemployment insurance
4, workers’ compensation insurance
The government insurance which provides assistance to people who become injured on their jobs is called the workers’ compensation insurance. The correct answer is option 4.
What is insurance?A party promises to compensate another party in exchange for a fee in the case of a certain loss, damage, or injury as a way of financial loss protection. It is a method of risk management that is mainly employed to protect against the risk of a potential loss.
When an employee becomes ill or injured due to their job, workers' compensation offers advantages to the employee. Medical expenses and rewards for temporary or permanent disabilities may also be covered by workers' compensation.
Therefore, workers’ compensation insurance provides assistance to people who become injured on their jobs.
To learn more on insurance, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/1400638
#SPJ7
Congress writes an emergency bill to give money to help victims of the tornado. This is an example of?
Answer: State and local emergency fund management
Explanation:
Explain the difference between ethical issues and legal issues.
Ethical issues are based on what's wrong and right, whereas legal issues are based on the law.
Examples of Ethical Issues:
Toxic Workplace Culture
Unrealistic and Conflicting Goals
Discrimination
Harassment
Examples of Legal Issues:
Annexations
Personnel decisions (terminations and general compliance with County policies, as well as state and federal laws)
Court of Tax Appeals
And so on, I hope this gives you a better understanding of what the two are and what makes them different from each other.
Emergency conditions can occur that require a president to make quick decisions. Which TWO tools would a president most likely use in such a situation?
- power of pardon
- executive order
- law of presidential succession
- power of veto
- state of emergency declaration
Answer:
power of pardon , state of emergency declaration
Explanation:
edmentum , plato
The two tools would a president most likely use in such a situation are the power of pardon and a state of emergency declaration. The correct option is (A & E).
What is the role of the president in the time of Emergency conditions?In India, under articles 352, 356 & 360, the president can proclaim three kinds of emergencies: national, state, and financial, in addition to promulgating laws under article 123.
If the security of a portion or all of India is endangered by "war, foreign attack, or armed revolt," the President of India has the authority to declare an emergency in any or all Indian states.
Although only Congress has the authority to declare war and allocate military money, the president is the commander in chief of the armed forces.
Therefore, an emergency condition can occur that requires a president to make quick decisions. The two tools would a president most likely use in such a situation are the power of pardon and a state of emergency declaration.
To know more about the Emergency conditions, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14740760
#SPJ7
A Law Enforcement agency has to concern themselves with _____________________ when administering justice?
Group of answer choices
Venue
Jurisdiction
The Sheriff
The Chief
Paragraph 2:
1. What cases refer to student rights in school?
2. What was the decision made in Tinker vs. Des Moines?
3. What was the decision made in Hazelwood vs. Kuhlmeier?
Paragraph 3:
1. What cases refer to rights of the accused?
2. What was the decision made in Gideon vs. Wainwright?
3. What was the decision made in Miranda vs. Arizona?
4. What was the decision made in In Re Gault?
Paragraph 4:
1. What cases refer to rights of citizens found in the 14th amendment?
2. What decision refer to Plessy vs. Ferguson?
3. What cases overturns Plessy vs. Ferguson?
4. What was the decision made in Brown vs. Board of Education?
Paragraph 5:
1. What Presidential cases has the Supreme Court reviewed?
2. What was the decision made in United States vs. Nixon?
3. What was the decision made in Bush vs. Gore?
Answer:
putting the learns at the center