how do i solve these ? ( step by step )

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

To determine if Tammy's answer of 1 3/4 for the product of 5/7 and 1 1/4 is correct, we can perform the multiplication ourselves.

First, we need to convert 1 1/4 to an improper fraction:

1 1/4 = (4 x 1 + 1)/4 = 5/4

Then, we can multiply the fractions:

5/7 x 5/4 = 25/28

As we can see, 25/28 is not equal to 1 3/4. Therefore, Tammy's answer of 1 3/4 is incorrect. The correct answer is 25/28, which is an improper fraction. We can also express this as a mixed number: 0 25/28.

Answer: sure....... i actually understand Spanish so this is gonna be easy.

Step-by-step explanation:

Give me a few minutes to do it

Ok for startes when you find a word cross it off the word bank that is where your first mistake is......

The smaller number is 5.5 and the larger number is 15.5.

Let's start by assigning variables to the two unknown numbers. Let x be the smaller number and y be the larger number.

From the problem statement, we know that:

x + y = 25 (the sum of the two numbers is 25)

y = 3x - 3 (the larger number is 3 less than three times the smaller)

We can use the second equation to solve for y in terms of x, by adding 3 to both sides:

y + 3 = 3x

Then, we can substitute this expression for y into the first equation:

x + (y + 3) = 25

Substituting y + 3 with 3x, we get:

x + 3x = 22

Combining like terms, we get:

4x = 22

Finally, we solve for x by dividing both sides by 4:

x = 5.5

Now that we know x, we can use the equation y = 3x - 3 to find y:

y = 3(5.5) - 3 = 15.5

Learn more about equation  here

brainly.com/question/13523562

#SPJ4

Answer:huh,

Step-by-step explanation:I don’t understand you’re saying

The width of the rectangular prism box is 1.5 inches if the length of the box is 5 inches and the height of the box is 8 inches.

The volume of a rectangular prism = 60 cubic inches.

The length of the box = 5 inches

The height of the box = 8 inches

To calculate the width of the rectangular prism, we can use the formula for volume:

Volume = length * width * height

Mathematically,

V = l*w*h

60 = 5w * 8

w = 60 / (5 * 8)

w = 1.5 inches

Therefore we can conclude that the width of the rectangular prism box is 1.5 inches.

To learn more about rectangular prism

https://brainly.com/question/21308574

#SPJ4

There is a roughly 16.85% chance that a bassist will be the first musician to register for the jazz camp.

Experimental probability is a type of probability that is based on actual observations or experiments. It is also called empirical probability

The ratio of the frequency of an occurrence to the total number of trials or observations is known as the experimental probability. In this case, the event is the first musician to sign up being a bassist.

Since there were 15 bassists out of 89 musicians who attended the camp last year, the experimental probability of the first musician to sign up being a bassist is:

Experimental probability = Number of bassists / Total number of musicians

Experimental probability = 15 / 89

Experimental probability = 0.1685 or approximately 16.85%

As a result, there is a roughly 16.85% chance that a bassist will be the first musician to register for the jazz camp.

To know more about experimental probability visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30694293

#SPJ1

10-hole harmonicas, which can produce a wider range of notes and are more commonly used in professional music settings.

An equation is a statement that expresses the equality of two mathematical expressions using mathematical symbols such as variables, numbers, and mathematical operations. The equality is represented by an equal sign "=" between the two expressions. Equations are used to represent mathematical relationships and solve problems in various fields such as physics, chemistry, engineering, and economics.

Given by the question.

The terms "6 holes and 1/2" and "10 holes" are often used to refer to harmonicas, which are small wind instruments that produce sounds when air is blown into or drawn out of them.

The main difference between a 6-hole harmonica and a 10-hole harmonica is the number of holes on the instrument. As the name suggests, a 6-hole harmonica has 6 holes, while a 10-hole harmonica has 10 holes.

In addition to the number of holes, the two types of harmonicas may also differ in their size, range, and the specific notes that they can produce. 6-hole harmonicas are typically smaller and produce a more limited range of notes compared

To learn more about equation:

https://brainly.com/question/1529522

#SPJ1

The polynomial function f(x) = x³ - 5x² - 61x - 55 has the following

Real zeros: x = -5, x = -1, and x = 11.  

To find the rational zeros of a polynomial, we use the rational zeros theorem. We look at the factors of the leading coefficient and the factors of the constant coefficient.

The  states that if a polynomial function is defined as P(x) = anxn + an-1xn-1 + ... + a1x + a0 with integers, then each rational zero of the polynomial can be expressed in the form p/q where p is a factor of a0 and q is a factor of an.

For example, if P(x) = 2x³ - 5x² + 3x + 6 then p can be any factor of 6 and q can be any factor of 2.

The factors of the leading coefficient, 1, and the factors of the constant coefficient, -55, are: ±1, ±5, ±11, ±55. So the possible rational zeros are: ±1, ±5, ±11, ±55, ±1/1, ±5/1, ±11/1, ±55/1, ±1/1, ±5/1, ±11/1, ±55/1.

Simplifying the results, we have that the potential rational zeros are: ±1, ±5, ±11, ±55, ±1, ±5, ±11, and ±55.

By testing each possible rational zero, we find that x = -5, x = -1, and x = 11 are the real zeros of f(x).

Hence, using synthetic division, we get:

(x + 5)(x + 1)(x - 11) = x³ - 5x² - 61x - 55

Thus, the function can be factored over the real numbers as

f(x) = (x + 5)(x + 1)(x - 11).

To learn more about Rational Zero Theorem: https://brainly.com/question/31070385

#SPJ11

The height of the tree is approximately 76 feet.

What is the angle of elevation?

The angle of elevation is the angle created between the line of sight and the horizontal. The angle created is an angle of elevation if the line of sight is upward from the horizontal line.

We can use tangent to set up the following two equations based on the given angles of elevation:

tan(62°) = h/x

tan(56°) = h/(x+10)

We can rearrange the first equation to solve for "h":

h = x * tan(62°)

tan(56°) = (x * tan(62°)) / (x+10)

We can solve for "x" by multiplying both sides by (x+10) and rearranging:

x = 10 * (tan(62°) - tan(56°)))

Now we can substitute this value for "x" into either of the two equations we set up earlier to find the height of the tree "h". Using the first equation, we get:

h = x * tan(62°) ≈ 76 feet

Therefore, the height of the tree is approximately 76 feet.

To know more about angle of elevation visit

https://brainly.com/question/88158

#SPJ1

Answer:

No it can,t be in standard for

Numeric (continuous) variable: the amount of zantac in milliliters that the nurse will administer.A millilitre is a unit of capacity measurement. It is one thousandth of a litre in size. In other words, a one-liter container may hold  [tex]1,000[/tex] millilitres.

A millilitre is a more manageable unit of measurement for liquid volume or capacity in the metric system. It is used to measure smaller amounts of liquid and is equal to one thousandth of a litre (1 litre = 1000 millilitres).

To calculate how many millilitres of Zantac will the nurse administer to the patient, you need to know the concentration of Zantac in the dosage form and the prescribed dose for the patient.

For example, if the patient is prescribed 150 mg of oral Zantac twice daily and has a bottle of syrup that contains 15 mg/mL of ranitidine, then the nurse will administer [tex]10 mL (150 mg / 15 mg/mL)[/tex]  of syrup per dose.

Therefore, If the patient is prescribed 50 mg of intravenous Zantac every 8 hours and has a vial of solution that contains 25 mg/mL of ranitidine, then the nurse will administer 2 mL (50 mg / 25 mg/mL) of solution per dose.

Learn more about zantac here:

https://brainly.com/question/30839058

#SPJ1

The approximate monthly percent decrease in value of the boat is 0.5%.

The given value of a boat is 21 200, and it loses 6% of its value every year. We are to find the approximate monthly percent decrease in value.

The given information is as follows: The value of a boat = $21,200The percentage decrease in value = 6%We are to find the approximate monthly percent decrease in value. Annual decrease in value of a boat is 6% of $21,200= $1,272Monthly decrease in value of a boat will be 1/12 of the annual decrease = $1,272/12≈ $106Thus, the approximate monthly percent decrease in value of the boat will be

[tex]$\frac{106}{21,200}*100\%=0.5\%$[/tex]

Therefore, the approximate monthly percent decrease in value of the boat is 0.5%.

Learn more about  percentages and exponential decay:https://brainly.com/question/29634879

#SPJ11

Your question is incomplete, but probably the complete question is :

The value of a boat is $21,200. It loses 6% of its value every year. Find the approximate monthly percent decrease in value. Round your answer to the nearest hundredth of a percent.

Answer:

4t - 22

Step-by-step explanation:

To find:-

Answer:-

To find out the perimeter we can simply add all the side lengths of the given figure. Since the given figure here is a rectangle, we can add up all the four sides to find the perimeter.

The four sides given to us are t-6 , t-5 , t-6 and t-5 .

Hence the perimeter of the quadrilateral would be ,

Perimeter = t-5 + t-6 + t-5 + t-6

Perimeter = 4t - 10 - 12

Perimeter = 4t - 22

Hence the perimeter of the given figure us 4t - 22.

[tex]\setlength{\unitlength}{1cm}\begin{picture}(0,0)\thicklines\multiput(0,0)(5,0){2}{\line(0,1){3}}\multiput(0,0)(0,3){2}{\line(1,0){5}}\put(0.03,0.02){\framebox(0.25,0.25)}\put(0.03,2.75){\framebox(0.25,0.25)}\put(4.74,2.75){\framebox(0.25,0.25)}\put(4.74,0.02){\framebox(0.25,0.25)}\multiput(2.1,-0.7)(0,4.2){2}{$\sf\large t-5$}\multiput(-1.4,1.4)(6.8,0){2}{$\sf\large t-6$}\put(-0.5,-0.4){\bf A}\put(-0.5,3.2){\bf D}\put(5.3,-0.4){\bf B}\put(5.3,3.2){\bf C}\end{picture} [/tex]

The mathematician William Jones is credited with first using the Greek letter π

The mathematician William Jones is credited with first using the Greek letter π to represent the ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter in a 1706 publication. He wrote, "there is no other more proper than Pi," and thus the symbol caught on among mathematicians. However, it's important to note that the concept of pi and its calculation had been around for thousands of years prior to Jones' use of the symbol.

Ancient Egyptian, Babylonian, and Indian mathematicians all had methods for approximating pi, and Archimedes famously used a geometric method to calculate it to a high degree of accuracy in the third century BCE.

Learn more about Pi here

brainly.com/question/16277677

#SPJ4

Answer:

The first one

Step-by-step explanation:

Use the pythagoras theorem=a ^2+b^2 =c^2

Use a is 9 b is 40 because the largest value is always the hypotenuse and the hypotenuse is always c.

so you do 9 squared add 40 squared to find c squared.

Square root the answer and you get 41 so it is a pythagoras triple

Therefore , the solution of the given problem of equation comes out to be  x = 5 is a correct answer to the problem.

Complex algorithms frequently employ variable words to demonstrate coherence between two opposing assertions. Equations are academic expressions that are used to demonstrate the equality of different academic figures. In this instance, normalization results in a + 7 rather than a separate algorithm who divides 12 onto two separate components and is able to evaluate data obtained from x + 7.

Here,

We can begin by making the provided equation simpler:

=> 5/(x - 4) = x/(x - 4)

=> 5 = x

Consequently, x = 5 is the answer to the problem.

The result of adding x = 4 to the initial equation is:

=> 5/(4 - 4) = 4/(4 - 4)

That amounts to:

=> 5/0 = 4/0

However, since division by zero is undefinable, the answer x = 4 is superfluous and does not satisfy the equation.

The result of the initial equation with x = 5 is:

=> 5/(5 - 4) = 5/(5 - 4)

That amounts to:

=> 5/1 = 5/1

As a result, x = 5 is a correct answer to the problem.

In conclusion, only one of the solutions -x = 5 is correct, and the other

-x = 4 is unnecessary because it results in a divide by zero.

To know more about equation visit:

https://brainly.com/question/649785

#SPJ1

Answer:

answer is 3

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: I can’t find it please help

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the probability of drawing a marble and then another marble from the bag, we need to multiply the probabilities of the individual events. This is because the two events are independent, and the outcome of the first event does not affect the outcome of the second event.

Let P(R) denote the probability of drawing a red marble, and P(B) denote the probability of drawing a blue marble. We are given that the bag contains red, blue, and green marbles, but we do not know the exact numbers of each color.

Since we replace the marble after each draw, the probability of drawing a red marble and then a blue marble can be found as:

P(RB) = P(R) x P(B)

To find P(R), we need to divide the number of red marbles in the bag by the total number of marbles. Similarly, to find P(B), we need to divide the number of blue marbles in the bag by the total number of marbles. However, since we do not know the exact numbers of each color, we cannot compute these probabilities exactly.

Therefore, we can only say that the probability of drawing a marble and then another marble is equal to the product of the probabilities of drawing each marble separately. In other words, the probability of drawing a red marble and then a blue marble is:

P(RB) = P(R) x P(B)

where P(R) and P(B) are the probabilities of drawing a red marble and a blue marble, respectively, which we cannot determine without more information about the contents of the bag.

For more details about probability click here:

https://brainly.com/question/30034780#

#SPJ11

The theoretical probability of stopping on the color blue when spinning a spinner with the colors red, yellow, blue, and green is 25% or 1/4.

A spinner is a tool that spins around an arrow or a pointer that points towards the numbers, colors, or pictures around its edge. The probability of a certain event is the likelihood of that event occurring. In this case, we need to find the theoretical probability of stopping on the color blue.

We have four colors on the spinner, so the probability of stopping on blue can be found using the formula of theoretical probability.

The formula for theoretical probability is:

number of favorable outcomes / total number of outcomes.

Since we have four colors on the spinner, the total number of outcomes is 4. The favorable outcomes are the number of times the spinner will land on blue, which is 1.

So the probability of stopping on the color blue can be calculated as follows:

1 (favorable outcome) / 4 (total number of outcomes) = 1/4

So, the theoretical probability of stopping on the color blue is 1/4. This is because there is an equal chance of landing on any of the four colors, and since there are four colors, each has a 25% chance of being selected.

Know more about probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ11

Caden's speed is 10 mph and Rahquez's speed is 16 mph faster, which is 16+6 = 32 mph

Let's use the formula: distance = rate x time

Since Caden and Rahquez are traveling towards each other, their combined distance will be 208 miles. Let's call Caden's speed "x" and Rahquez's speed "x+6", since Rahquez is traveling 6 mph faster than Caden.

Using the formula above, we can set up the equation:

208 = (x + x + 6) * 8

Simplifying, we get:

208 = (2x + 6) * 8

208 = 16x + 48

160 = 16x

x = 10

Therefore, Caden's speed is 10 mph and Rahquez's speed is 32 mph.

For more questions like Speed visit the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/30209514

#SPJ11

Answer:

2*22/7/27+1

Step-by-step explanation:

2*22/7*27+1

2*(594+1)/7

2*595/7

2*85

170 ans..

Answer:

x=130°

Step-by-step explanation:

The sum of the angel of the pentagon is equal to 540°

X+90+x+150+x=540

3x+240=540

3x=540-150

3x=390

X=130

the receiver is located at (0, 0, 2.25 feet) or (0, 0, 27 inches).To find the location of the receiver, we first need to determine the equation of the paraboloid.

The standard equation for a paraboloid of revolution with a vertical axis is:

z = [tex](x^2 + y^2)[/tex]/(4f)

Where:

z is the height at any point (x, y) on the paraboloid.

x and y are the horizontal coordinates of the point.

f is the focal length of the paraboloid, which is half the depth of the dish.

In this case, the dish is 6 feet across at its opening, so the diameter is 6 feet and the radius is 3 feet. Therefore, the maximum value of x and y is 3 feet. The depth of the dish is given as 2 feet.

Using these values, we can solve for the focal length:

2 = [tex](3^2 + 3^2)[/tex]/(4f)

2 = 18/(4f)

f = 18/8 = 9/4 = 2.25 feet

Now that we have the value of f, we can find the location of the receiver, which is placed at the focus of the paraboloid. The focus is located at (0, 0, f).

Therefore, the receiver is located at (0, 0, 2.25 feet) or (0, 0, 27 inches).

Learn more about equation here

https://brainly.com/question/29657992

#SPJ4

An algebraic expression for representing the Nora's income in form of Tonya's income is given by  y = ( x / 4 ) .

Let us consider 'x' represents the Tonya's income.

And variable 'y' represents the Nora's income.

Tonya income is equal to four times of Nora's income.

This implies,

Nora's income is equal to one fourth times of Tonya's income.

⇒ y = ( x / 4 )

Rewrite an algebraic expression to represents Tonya's income in terms of Nora's income we have,

Simplify by multiplying both the sides of the algebraic expression by 4 we get,

⇒ x  = 4y

Therefore, an algebraic expression to represents the Nora's income in terms of Tonya's income is equal to y = ( x / 4 ).

Learn more about algebraic expression here

brainly.com/question/30480951

#SPJ4

Answer:

x^2 +6x+7

Step-by-step explanation:

for roots a and b

x^2 - (a+b)x + ab = (x-a)(x-b)

There are 12 red socks and 18 black socks in a sock drawer. If you randomly choose two socks at once, the probability you get a matching pair is 50%.

The probability of getting a matching pair of socks can be calculated as follows:

First, we can calculate the total number of ways to choose 2 socks out of 30:

C(30, 2) = 30! / (2! * (30-2)!) = 435

Now, we need to calculate the number of ways to choose 2 socks such that they are both black or both red:

Number of ways to choose 2 black socks: C(18, 2) = 153

Number of ways to choose 2 red socks: C(12, 2) = 66

Therefore, the total number of ways to choose a matching pair of socks is 153 + 66 = 219.

Finally, we can calculate the probability of getting a matching pair of socks by dividing the number of ways to choose a matching pair by the total number of ways to choose 2 socks:

P(matching pair) = 219 / 435 ≈ 0.5034

Therefore, the probability of getting a matching pair of socks is approximately 0.5034 or 50.34%.

To learn more about probability, refer:-

https://brainly.com/question/11234923

#SPJ4

In conclusion, the relation R on the set of all integers satisfies reflexivity and symmetry but not transitivity.

To determine which properties the relation R on the set of all integers satisfy, we need to check for reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity.

1. Reflexivity: A relation R is reflexive if for every element a in the set, (a, a) ∈ R.
In this case, we need to check if a * a ≥ 1 for all integers a.
Since any integer squared (a * a) is greater than or equal to 1, R is reflexive.

2. Symmetry: A relation R is symmetric if for every pair (a, b) ∈ R, (b, a) also ∈ R.
In this case, we need to check if a * b ≥ 1 implies b * a ≥ 1.
Since multiplication is commutative (a * b = b * a), the condition holds true, and R is symmetric.

3. Transitivity: A relation R is transitive if for every (a, b) ∈ R and (b, c) ∈ R, (a, c) also ∈ R.
In this case, we need to check if a * b ≥ 1 and b * c ≥ 1 imply a * c ≥ 1.
Let's take the counterexample: a = -1, b = 2, and c = -1. We have -1 * 2 ≥ 1 and 2 * -1 ≥ 1, but -1 * -1 ≥ 1 is false.

Therefore, R is not transitive.

for such more questions on integer squared

https://brainly.com/question/24071913

#SPJ11

in approximately 22 years, the population would exceed the food supply, even if the country doubles its initial food supply and doubles the rate at which its food supply increases.

How to calculate the rate?

To answer these questions, we need to calculate the population and food supply at different points in time and compare them.

Let's first calculate the population after t years:

Population after t years = 2,000,000 * (1 + 4%) raise to the power t

And the food supply after t years:

Food supply after t years = 4,000,000 + 0.5 million * t

Now, let's answer the first question:

If the country doubled its initial food supply and maintained a constant rate of increase in the supply adequate for an additional 0.5 million people per year, would shortages still occur?

If the country doubles its initial food supply, the new food supply would be 8,000,000, and it would still increase at a rate of 0.5 million people per year. Let's calculate the year when the population exceeds the food supply:

Population = Food supply

2,000,000 * (1 + 4%)^t = 8,000,000 + 0.5 million * t

Solving for t, we get t ≈ 17.77 years.

So, in approximately 18 years, the population would exceed the food supply, even if the country doubles its initial food supply and maintains a constant rate of increase in the supply adequate for an additional 0.5 million people per year.

Now, let's answer the second question:

If the country doubled the rate at which its food supply increases, in addition to doubling its initial food supply, would shortages still occur?

If the country doubles the rate at which its food supply increases, the new rate would be 1 million people per year. Let's calculate the year when the population exceeds the food supply:

Population = Food supply

2,000,000 * (1 + 4%) raise to the power t  = 16,000,000 + 1 million * t

Solving for t, we get t ≈ 21.96 years.

So, in approximately 22 years, the population would exceed the food supply, even if the country doubles its initial food supply and doubles the rate at which its food supply increases.

To know more about rate visit :-

https://brainly.com/question/28398580

#SPJ1