How did the American Population impact Texas?

Answer:

Katana

Explanation:

the first time I saw the was the only thing I was in the halls of the atmosphere

Answer:

Katana

Explanation:

The most iconic and well known of all the Samurai swords; the katana is distinguished by its long blade and handle that is made to accommodate two hands and strike from a large distance. It has a curved, slender, single-edged blade with a circular or squared guard.

Answer:

As the first Roman emperor to claim conversion to Christianity, Constantine played an influential role in the proclamation of the Edict of Milan in 313, which decreed tolerance for Christianity in the empire. He called the First Council of Nicaea in 325, at which the Nicene Creed was professed by Christians.

Answer:

Hamilton

Explanation:

Answer:

I think its B

Explanation:

Answer:

It not only functioned as a plea for equality and justice; it also helped pave the way for both the ratification of the Twenty-fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution (outlawing the poll tax, a tax levied on individuals as a requirement for voting) and the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (desegregating public

Explanation:

Answer:

Good Dicipline and Training, follows orders (unless an soldier is an officer)

Explanation:

Answer:

The answer is D

Explanation:

Answer:

Kentucky saw many of the social changes that were brought about due to the war. Women moved into the work force, driving taxi cabs, standing guard at the Bluegrass Ordinance Depot, working at USO cantinas, led collections efforts, aided hospitals and Red Cross, grew victory gardens, and conducted war bond drives.

Explanation:

Hope it helps!

Option D is the correct one

Answer: True

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

With the end of the Cold War, both the United States and Russia are in a position to use force more selectively and with less risk. Absent a global superpower rivalry, neither feels the same compulsion to intervene almost everywhere to protect or secure a competitive advantage. At the same time, intervention almost anywhere is now safer because there is no danger of escalation to apocalyptic levels. Despite these similarities, however, the differences in the respective post-Cold War security circumstances of the two countries are more striking than the similarities and have weighed more heavily in their intervention decisionmaking.

The end of the Cold War and the collapse of Soviet Communism left the United States as the world's only superpower—a status that, for some Americans, entailed a responsibility to create a "new world order," if need be by periodic resorts to force to curb regional instability. In contrast, post-Soviet Russia emerged from the disintegration of the old order with a sharply reduced international power position and an extended zone of instability along its southern and western flanks, as well as with internal threats to its own territorial integrity. In consequence, Russia has used force exclusively within the former Soviet Union, while the United States has intervened in Europe, Africa, the Caribbean, and Central America.

At the same time that differences in power and reach between Russia and the United States have become more pronounced, the institutional and procedural differences between them have diminished as a result of Russia's slow but continuing democratization. How far this process of convergence has gone in the area of intervention and force employment decisionmaking is one of the central issues examined in the concluding chapter of this book. The earlier chapters present case studies of nine instances of regional military intervention undertaken by the two countries since 1991, and one analogous case study from the late Cold War era—of American peacekeeping in Lebanon in 1982–1984. For the United States, in addition to the intervention in Lebanon, these case studies cover the former Yugoslavia, Panama, Haiti, and Africa, as well as a cross-cutting look at how the Bush administration approached its intervention and force employment decisionmaking. For Russia, the case studies describe the decision-making process that led to the use of force in Ossetia-Ingushetia, Trans-Dniestria, Tadjikistan, Abkhazia, and Chechnya.

These case studies are, first and foremost, descriptive in that they revisit events chronologically and highlight the issues at stake, as well as the interplay of individuals and institutions that accounted for the flow of events. However, they are written from an analytic perspective with a view to the formulation of useful generalizations about the decision-making practices of the two countries. Their value as inputs to such an undertaking is enhanced by the fact that their authors were either direct participants in or first-hand observers of the events described.

A word is in order about one important unexamined case: Operation Desert Storm, which provides an all but prototypical example of "mature" intervention decisionmaking with respect to such key considerations as objectives planning, consensus-building, coalition formation, and operational discipline. It has been excluded from consideration here because the force employed was quantitatively and qualitatively different by several orders of magnitude from that employed in all other post-Cold War instances.

Since most of the interventions described below have not previously been subjected to detailed analysis from a decision-making perspective, this volume should fill an important gap in the scholarly literature on post-Cold War crisis interventions. Hopefully, it will also provide Russian and American policymakers with a better understanding of how decisions on security issues are made in the other's country. If so, it may help not only to avert misunderstandings but also to strengthen cooperative security relations between the two countries. Nuclear issues excepted, neither country is a pivotal factor in the other's security planning today. This may not be true in the future, however, and now is certainly an appropriate time to capitalize on unprecedented opportunities to forge close links between security analysts and practitioners in the two countries and to break down barriers of ignorance and mistrust that could complicate bilateral relations and prevent the emergence of a meaningful security partnership.

Section One: Russian Cases

Chapter 1: Ossetia-Ingushetia

by Alan Ch. Kasaev [1]

The rise of industry came accompanied with the rise of new, most lucrative jobs. During the late 1880's into the early 1900's, nearly forty percent of all rural townships lost the majority of their populations after people started migrating to big cities such as New York.

This migration was caused by the emergence of new factories and businesses to specific regions. This in turn created an incredible demand for factory line labor. As more and more people moved to these new production hubs, more businesses followed, and so did the need for more workers, only adding to the demand and migration of people looking for jobs and/or higher wages.

Answer:

On July 15, 1979, President Jimmy Carter addresses the nation via live television to discuss the nation’s energy crisis and accompanying recession.

Carter prefaced his talk about energy policy with an explanation of why he believed the American economy remained in crisis. He recounted a meeting he had hosted at the presidential retreat in Camp David, Maryland, with leaders in the fields of business, labor, education, politics and religion. Although the energy crisis and recession were the main topics of conversation, Carter heard from the attendees that Americans were also suffering from a deeper moral and spiritual crisis. This lack of “moral and spiritual confidence,” he concluded, was at the core of America’s inability to hoist itself out of its economic troubles. He also admitted that part of the problem was his failure to provide strong leadership on many issues, particularly energy and oil consumption.

In 1979, America could still feel the effects of OPEC’s (Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries) 1973 cuts in oil production. Carter quoted one of the Camp David meeting participants as saying that America’s “neck is stretched over the fence and OPEC has a knife.” In addition, inflation had reached an all-time high during Carter’s term. Americans saw the federal government as a bloated bureaucracy that had become stagnant and was failing to serve the people. Politics, Carter said, was full of corruption, inefficiency and evasiveness; he claimed these problems grew out of a deeper, “fundamental threat to American democracy.” He was not referring to challenges to civil liberties or the country’s political structure or military prowess, however, but to what he called a “crisis of confidence” that led to domestic turmoil and “the loss of a unity of purpose for our nation.”

At a time when Europeans and the Japanese began out-producing the U.S. in energy-efficient automobiles and some other advanced technologies, Carter said that Americans had lost faith in being the world’s leader in “progress.” He claimed that Americans obsession with self-indulgence and material goods had trumped spiritualism and community values. Carter, who after the presidency would teach Sunday School, tried to rally the public to have faith in the future of America. After restoring faith in itself, the nation would be able to march on to the “the battlefield of energy [where] we can win for our nation a new confidence, and we can seize control again of our common destiny.”

Carter then launched into his energy policy plans, which included the implementation of mandatory conservation efforts for individuals and businesses and deep cuts in the nation’s dependence on foreign oil through import quotas. He also pledged a “massive commitment of funds and resources” to develop alternative fuel sources including coal, plant products and solar power. He outlined the creation of a “solar bank” that he said would eventually supply 20 percent of the nation’s energy. To jumpstart this program, Carter asked Congress to form an “energy mobilization board” modeled after the War Production Board of World War II, and asked the legislature to enact a “windfall profits tax” immediately to fight inflation and unemployment.

Carter ended by asking for input from average citizens to help him devise an energy agenda for the 1980s. Carter, a liberal president, was heading into a presidential campaign just as a tide of conservatism was rising, led by presidential hopeful Ronald Reagan, who went on to win the 1980 campaign.

Explanation:

Carter began his discussion on energy strategy by explaining why he believes the American economy is still in a state of crisis. Carter hosted a meeting with leaders from business, labor, education, and others.

]When these new attempts to return us to pre-crisis emotional balance fail, we enter a crisis state.

The crisis is a state of mind; an internal feeling of befuddlement and anxiety to the point when previously efficient coping mechanisms fail and poor decisions and behaviors take their

Thus, energy strategy is the reason for the state of crisis.

Learn more about the state of crisis here:

https://brainly.com/question/16339377

Stalin wanted compensation as the USSR had suffered the loss of 28 million soldiers

Stalin did not trust the West as they had fought against the communists in the Civil War of 1918 – 1919

Stalin believe that the British and Americans wanted Russia to destroy itself fighting Germany What the USA thought of communism.

Answer:

A,B,C,F,G

Explanation:

The General Assembly adopted a policy of "Great Resistance," using the law and the courts to prevent divisions. Thus, the correct statements are Options A, B, C, F, and G.

In Brown's decision v. The Board of Education ranged from enthusiastic approvals to fierce opposition.

In this case, the reaction to the Brown v. Board of Education ruling in the South was:

Thus, the correct statement are Options A, B, C, F, and G.

Learn more about Brown v. Board of Education here:

https://brainly.com/question/1043066

#SPJ2

Answer:

because

Explanation:

Answer:

Imperialist threatened traditional cultures by placing new political boundaries over former tribal lands

Explanation:

trust me bro jk but it right it was on my review

Answer:

The use of machines in manufacturing spread throughout American industry after the Civil War. With machines, workers could produce goods many times faster than they could by hand.  The nation's abundant water supply helped power the industrial machines. Forests provided timber for construction and wooden products.

Explanation:

Answer:

people used Natural resources to cook food, fuels and raw materials for the production of goods.

As a country that relies on immigrant resources as its strength, Israel's Jews have two characteristics that perhaps few other countries have, that is, adventurousness and extreme nationalism.

Since the founding of the nation, Israel has conceived that, for the national economy to really take off, three additional factors need to be added: a new wave of immigration, a new war, and a new venture capital industry.

Israel is a country that always welcomes the return of Jews around the world. As soon as they arrived in Israel the day before, the next day, they were recognized as nationals and enjoyed all the same benefits as all those who have settled here for a long time.

Answer:

A

Explanation:

british ruled everything lol

Answer:

B.

Explanation:

The British world Hong Kong since I believe 1997It is an island in the southern part of Hong Kong

The major fear for Americans during the Cold War was communism were:

What was Cold War and why?

The Cold War was an ongoing political rivalry between the United States and the Soviet Union and their respective allies that developed after World War II. This hostility between the two superpowers was first given its name by George Orwell in an article published in 1945.

Learn more about the cold war here: https://brainly.com/question/25774915

#SPJ2

Answer:

With its more positive tone the Texas Bill of Rights provides much the same protections as the U.S. Bill of Rights. But it also extends beyond federal protections. For example, Sec. 3a explicitly forbids discrimination based on sex, race, color, creed, or national origin.

Explanation:

In many ways, the Texas Bill of Rights offers the same protections as the American Bill of Rights. It still does, however, go beyond constitutional benefits.

A constitution is a fundamental document that defines rules and regulations, laws and legislation as well as the power and authority of the government to conduct the functioning of any country.

The English Bill of Rights constrained governmental power and gave citizens more freedoms, enabling them to express themselves freely and engage in free speech.

There were minimal personal liberties guaranteed under the Constitution, which focused primarily on the composition of the government.

The Bill of Rights, which is made up of the first ten amendments of the Constitution, was where they were instead set down afterward.

Learn more about Constitution, here:

https://brainly.com/question/14453917

#SPJ2

Answer:

The Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) is a civil rights organization founded in 1957, as an offshoot of the Montgomery Improvement Association (MIA), which successfully staged a 381-day boycott of the Montgomery Alabama's segregated bus system

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

El Siglo de Oro comenzó con la unificación política parcial de España hacia 1500. Su literatura se caracteriza por el fervor patriótico y religioso, el realismo elevado y un nuevo interés por las epopeyas y baladas anteriores, junto con las influencias algo menos pronunciadas del humanismo y el neoplatonismo.