Help!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Answer:

B. 27 Units

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the perimeter of the figure, we simply add up the lengths of all the sides.

So, the perimeter of the figure with sides of length 8, 6, 4, and 9 units is:

P = 8 + 6 + 4 + 9 = 27 units

Therefore, the answer is B. 27 units.

Therefore, the options "it is usually shown on the horizontal axis of a scatter diagram" and "it is usually shown on the vertical axis of a scatter diagram" could both be true, depending on the preference of the researcher or the convention used in a particular field or context.

Neither of the variables is considered as the dependent variable in a correlation analysis. Correlation refers to the strength of the relationship between two variables, without implying a cause-and-effect relationship or assigning one variable as the independent or dependent variable. Therefore, the options "in a cause and effect relationship, it is the effect" and "in a cause and effect relationship, it is the cause" are not applicable.

To know more about variable,

https://brainly.com/question/2466865

#SPJ11

Answer: 13.1

Step-by-step explanation:

Arc length is angle of given section divided by 360 multiply all of this by the circumference. A is the angle, b is the radius d is the circumference. X is the arc length.

(letters shown have no correlation with the answer choices)

[tex]a=125\\b=6\\d\ =\ \left(2b\right)\cdot3.14\\x=\left(\frac{a}{360}\right)\cdot d[/tex]

This makes the arc length equal to 13.0833333333, which you can round up to be 13.1.

Even if you leave pi as what the Desmos Graphing Calculator simplifies it to, it still gives you the answer 13.08996939, which can be rounded up to 13.1.

Although you did not ask for this further information, the arc measure is equal to the center angle that corresponds to the arc, meaning the arc measure is equal to 125°, regardless what the radius or circumference is.

The present ages of Korir, his daughter and his son is 48, 12 and 8 years respectively.

Let us represent the present ages as:

K = Korir

d = daughter of Korir

s = son of Korir

From the first statement in the problem, we can deduce the following:

Korir's age is 4 times his daughter's age: K = 4d

Korir's age is 6 times his son's age: K = 6s

We can use these two equations to solve for K in terms of both d and s:

K = 4d = 6s

4d = 6s

d = 3/2s

Next, we use the second statement in the problem to form another equation:

In 12 years, the sum of the ages of his daughter and son will differ from his age by 9 years.

(d + 12) + (s + 12) = K + 9

Substitute the equation K = 4d into this equation to get:

(d + 12) + (s + 12) = 4d + 9

d + s + 33 = 4d + 9

3d - s = 24

Substitute the equation d = 3/2s into this equation to get:

3(3/2s) - s = 24

9/2s - s = 24

s = 8

Finally, we can use the equation d = 3/2s to solve for d:

d = 3/2s = 3/2(8) = 12

For Korir,

K = 4d = 4(12) = 48

Therefore, Korir is 48 years old, daughter is 12 years old and his son is 8 years old.

Learn more about word problem here:

https://brainly.com/question/21405634

#SPJ1

To find the p-value for the test examining the positive linear relationship between speed and jump height, you need to calculate the Pearson correlation coefficient, determine the degrees of freedom, and then find the corresponding p-value.

To determine the p-value for this test, we would need to conduct a hypothesis test using a linear regression model. The null hypothesis would be that there is no linear relationship between speed and jump height, while the alternative hypothesis would be that there is a positive linear relationship between the two variables.

After running the regression model and performing the hypothesis test, we would look for the p-value associated with the slope coefficient for speed. If this p-value is less than the chosen significance level (usually 0.05), we can conclude that there is convincing evidence of a positive linear relationship between speed and jump height for students like these.

Without actually running the regression model and hypothesis test, it is not possible to provide an exact p-value for this scenario.

To determine if there is convincing evidence of a positive linear relationship between speed (mph) and jump height (in) for students like these, you need to conduct a correlation test, specifically a Pearson correlation test. The p-value will help you determine the significance of the relationship.

Step-by-step explanation:

1. Gather the data: Obtain the values for speed (mph) and jump height (in) for each student.

2. Calculate the Pearson correlation coefficient (r): This value will help you measure the strength and direction of the linear relationship between the two variables. You can use statistical software or a calculator for this.

3. Determine the degrees of freedom (df): Calculate this by subtracting 2 from the total number of data points (n). Formula: df = n - 2.

4. Calculate the p-value: Using the Pearson correlation coefficient (r) and the degrees of freedom (df), you can find the p-value in a t-distribution table or by using statistical software.

5. Interpret the p-value: If the p-value is less than your chosen significance level (commonly 0.05), there is convincing evidence of a positive linear relationship between speed and jump height. If the p-value is greater than 0.05, there is not enough evidence to suggest a significant positive linear relationship.

In summary, to find the p-value for the test examining the positive linear relationship between speed and jump height, you need to calculate the Pearson correlation coefficient, determine the degrees of freedom, and then find the corresponding p-value. Comparing this p-value to your chosen significance level will help you conclude if there is convincing evidence of a positive linear relationship between the two variables.

Learn more about regression model at: brainly.com/question/14983410

#SPJ11

The probability of selecting a brown or black golf ball from the bag is 3/4 or 0.75.


To find the probability of the golf ball being either brown or black, follow these steps:

1. Find the total number of balls in the golf bag.
2. Calculate the combined number of brown and black balls.
3. Divide the number of brown and black balls by the total number of balls.

Step 1: Total number of balls = 5 brown + 7 black + 4 yellow = 16 balls
P(brown or black) = P(brown) + P(black)
P(brown or black) = 5/16 + 7/16
P(brown or black) = 12/16 or 3/4

Step 2: Combined number of brown and black balls = 5 brown + 7 black = 12 balls

Step 3: Probability of selecting a brown or black ball = (number of brown and black balls) / (total number of balls) = 12/16

To simplify the fraction, we can divide both the numerator and denominator by 4:
12/16 = (12/4) / (16/4) = 3/4

So, the probability of selecting a brown or black golf ball is 3/4 or 0.75.

Learn more about Probability:

brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

Answer:f(x)=2x3^x

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: 2(u-3)(2u-3)

Step-by-step explanation:

4u²-18u +18           take out the greatest common factor, 2, all terms can be divided by 2

2(2u²-9u +9)         to factor, multiply the first and the last parts of the quadratic.  2(9)=18   Find 2 numbers that multiply to 18 but add to the middle number.  

-6 and -3  both multyiply to +18 but add to -9

Take those 2 numbers, -6 and -3, and replace the  middle term with those numbers

2(2u²-6u-3u +9)  we have not changed the equation, we have simply replaced the term and broke it up.  -9u = -6u-3u

2(2u²-6u-3u+9) now we "group" the first 2 terms and the last 2

2[(2u²-6u)(-3u +9)]    this is not your factor you must take out the greatest common factor from each of the groupings

2[2u(u-3)-3(u-3)]   if the parentheses are the same, then you've done a good job. the first factoring will be what is in your parentheses, the second will be what ever is left.

2(u-3)(2u-3)

We use this method because there is a coefficient, number in front of the [tex]u^{2}[/tex]

40) If the demand for specialty car license plates is perfectly inelastic and the supply curve is upward sloping, then the burden of the tax falls entirely on the consumers (drivers). Therefore, option C) Drivers pay all of the tax is true.

41) If the elasticity of demand for a product is 0 and the elasticity of supply is 1, then the burden of the tax falls entirely on the consumers (buyers). Therefore, option B) Buyers pay all of the tax is true.

42) If the demand for peaches from South Carolina is perfectly elastic and the supply curve is upward sloping, then the burden of the tax falls entirely on the producers (peach sellers). Therefore, option A) Peach sellers pay all of the tax is true.

40) In this scenario, since the demand for specialty car license plates is perfectly inelastic and the supply curve is upward sloping, the correct answer is C) Drivers pay all of the tax. This is because the burden of the tax falls entirely on the consumers with perfectly inelastic demand.

41) With an elasticity of demand of 0 and elasticity of supply of 1, the correct answer is B) buyers pay all of the tax. This is because the inelastic demand means that buyers will absorb the entire tax burden, whereas the elastic supply indicates that sellers can adjust their supply in response to the tax.

42) When the demand for peaches from South Carolina is perfectly elastic and the supply curve is upward sloping, the correct answer is A) peach sellers pay all of the tax. This is because buyers will simply switch to other sources if the price increases due to the tax, so the burden of the tax falls entirely on the peach sellers.

Visit here to learn more about supply curve  : https://brainly.com/question/6075885
#SPJ11

95% Confidence Interval = (0.310, 0.490), 98% Confidence Interval = (0.293, 0.507), 99% Confidence Interval = (0.278, 0.522)

To compute the confidence intervals for the population proportion p, we need to use the following formula:

CI = p ± z * √(p(1-p)/n)

Where CI is the confidence interval, p is the sample proportion, z is the z-score for the desired level of confidence, and n is the sample size.

For p = 0.4 and n = 129, we have:

- For a 95% confidence interval, the z-score is 1.96:
CI = 0.4 ± 1.96 * √(0.4(1-0.4)/129) = (0.323, 0.477)
So we can say with 95% confidence that the population proportion p is between 0.323 and 0.477.

- For a 98% confidence interval, the z-score is 2.33:
CI = 0.4 ± 2.33 * √(0.4(1-0.4)/129) = (0.304, 0.496)
So we can say with 98% confidence that the population proportion p is between 0.304 and 0.496.

- For a 99% confidence interval, the z-score is 2.58:
CI = 0.4 ± 2.58 * √(0.4(1-0.4)/129) = (0.293, 0.507)
So we can say with 99% confidence that the population proportion p is between 0.293 and 0.507.

In summary, as the level of confidence increases, the width of the confidence interval increases, reflecting the increased uncertainty in our estimate of the population proportion.

To compute the 95%, 98%, and 99% confidence intervals for the population proportion p with p=0.4 and n=129, you can use the following formula:

Confidence Interval = p ± Z * sqrt((p*(1-p))/n)

Where p is the proportion, n is the sample size, and Z is the Z-score corresponding to the desired confidence level (1.96 for 95%, 2.33 for 98%, and 2.58 for 99%).

95% Confidence Interval = 0.4 ± 1.96 * sqrt((0.4*(1-0.4))/129)
98% Confidence Interval = 0.4 ± 2.33 * sqrt((0.4*(1-0.4))/129)
99% Confidence Interval = 0.4 ± 2.58 * sqrt((0.4*(1-0.4))/129)

After performing the calculations, you will get:

95% Confidence Interval = (0.310, 0.490)
98% Confidence Interval = (0.293, 0.507)
99% Confidence Interval = (0.278, 0.522)

These intervals represent the range in which the true population proportion is likely to be found with the given confidence level.

Learn more about Confidence Interval at: brainly.com/question/24131141

#SPJ11

The set of points { (x, y, z) | x² + y² = 1} actually represents a cylinder, not a circle.

To understand why, let's analyze the equation and the terms provided: The equation x² + y² = 1 represents a circle in the xy-plane because it satisfies the standard equation for a circle with a radius of 1 centered at the origin (0,0). However, since there is a third coordinate 'z' present without any restrictions or dependence on 'x' and 'y', it allows the circle to extend along the z-axis infinitely in both positive and negative directions.

Therefore, when combining the circle in the xy-plane with the unrestricted z-axis, we get a cylinder with a radius of 1 centered along the z-axis.

More on sets of points: https://brainly.com/question/31315095

#SPJ11

The constraint corresponding to node London in the shortest path problem, considering the westbound routes, is:
X(Waterloo-London) + X(Hamilton-London) - X(London-Windsor) = 0

The constraint corresponding to node London would be:
X(Waterloo-London) + X(Hamilton-London) >= 1

This is because the constraint ensures that there is at least one path that includes London in the route, in order to travel from Toronto to Windsor.

In mathematics, a constraint is a condition that the solution of an optimization problem must meet. In general, there are two types of constraints: inequality and inequality. A solution set that satisfies all constraints is called a fit set. An equation is an example of a constraint. We can use it to think about what it means to solve equations and inequalities.

For example, solving 3x + 4 = 10 gives x = 2, which is an easier way to express the same limit.

Learn more about Constraints:

brainly.com/question/15319802

#SPJ11

The null hypothesis (H0) in this case would be that the lightbulbs last exactly 2,000 hours before needing to be replaced. The alternate hypothesis (HA) would be that the lightbulbs last less than 2,000 hours, which aligns with your suspicion. Therefore, the correct answer would be c.) H0 = 2,000 hours; HA < 2,000 hours.

In your question, you are suspicious that GELighting'ss claim of their lightbulbs lasting exactly 2,000 hours might not be accurate, and you believe they last less than 2,000 hours. To address your concern, we can set up null and alternate hypotheses:

Null hypothesis (H0): The lightbulbs last exactly 2,000 hours. This is the claim you're trying to test.The alternatee hypothesis (HA): The lightbulbs last less than 2,000 hours. This is what you suspect might be true.

Based on the options provided, the correct answer is:
c.) H0 = 2,000 hours; HA < 2,000 hours

Learn more about null hypothesis:

brainly.com/question/28920252

#SPJ11

The solution is:

Anna bought 3 pounds of grapes, 6 pounds of bananas, and 5 pounds of apples.

Let the amount of grapes be g. The amount of grapes, bananas, and apples are represented as follows.

Grapes: g

Bananas: 2g

Apples: g + 2

The total amount is 14; that means the above expressions must be equal to 14. Set up an equation and solve algebraically for g.

14 = g + 2g + (g + 2)

14 = g + 2g + g + 2

14 = 4g + 2

12 = 4g

3 = g

Remember, g represents the amount of grapes; that means Anna bought 3 pounds of grapes. To find the amount of bananas and apples, substitute into the expressions 2g and g + 2.

2g  =>  2(3)  =>  6

g + 2  =>  3 + 2  =>  5

Anna bought 3 pounds of grapes, 6 pounds of bananas, and 5 pounds of apples.

To earn more on addition click:

brainly.com/question/29560851

#SPJ1

The height of the ball will be 16.94 feet. Then the baseball travels over the fence.

Given that:

Distance at time t, x = 140t

Height at time t, y = 3.1 + 40t − 16t²

Height, h = 10 feet

Distance, x = 320 feet

The time is calculated as,

320 = 140t

t = 320/140

t = 16/7

The height at t = 16/7 is calculated as,

y = 3.1 + 40(16/7) − 16(16/7)²

y = 3.1 + 97.43 - 83.59

y = 16.94 feet

y > 10 feet

The height of the ball will be 16.94 feet. Then the baseball travels over the fence.

More about the function link is given below.

https://brainly.com/question/5245372

#SPJ1

NORMDIST uses numerical integration to compute the cumulative probability associated with a given point in the normal distribution because an analytical solution for the CDF is not available.

NORMDIST is a function that calculates the probability density function (PDF) or cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the normal distribution (also known as the Gaussian distribution). It uses numerical integration because the normal distribution's CDF cannot be expressed as a simple closed-form equation.

The reason for using numerical integration in NORMDIST is to compute the area under the curve of the normal distribution's PDF up to a specific point. This area represents the cumulative probability of a value being less than or equal to the given point. Numerical integration is an efficient way to approximate the integral of the function when an analytical solution is not possible or feasible.

In summary, NORMDIST uses numerical integration to compute the cumulative probability associated with a given point in the normal distribution because an analytical solution for the CDF is not available.

Learn more about numerical integration here:

https://brainly.com/question/13717160

#SPJ11

The number of ways is written as

The number o f ways is solved using combination

The term combination refers to a method of choosing where other does not matter.

In this case we have 15 combination 3 written as ¹⁵C₃

This is expressed mathematically as

¹⁵C₃  = (15! / (3!(15 - 3)! )

= 15! / (3! x 12!)

= (15 x 14 x 13 x 12!) / (3! x 12!)

= (15 x 14 x 13) / (3 x 2 x 1)

Learn more about permutation and combinations here:

https://brainly.com/question/11732255

#SPJ1

Probability is the likelihood or chance of an event occurring.

The probability of Malik drawing a green marble on the first draw is 7/10, and the probability of drawing a black marble on the second draw, without replacement, is 3/9 (since there are 9 marbles left in the bag after the first draw, and 3 of them are black). Therefore, the probability of drawing a green marble followed by a black marble is:

P(Green, then Black) = P(Green) x P(Black | Green)

P(Green, then Black) = (7/10) x (3/9)

Simplifying:

P(Green, then Black) = 7/30

So the equation to show the probability of Malik drawing a green marble and then a black marble is:

P(Green, then Black) = (7/10) x (3/9) = 7/30

learn about probability,

https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ11

The actual area in square feet of the base of the building given the scale model will be; 418 square feet.

Since scale drawing is a reduced form in the dimensions of an original image / building / object.

Therefore, Scale of the drawing = original dimensions / dimensions of the scale drawing

Length of the base = 2 x 47 = 94 ft

Width of the base = 1 x 47 = 47

Area = 47 x 94 = 4418 square feet

To learn more about scale drawings, please check: brainly.com/question/26388230

#SPJ1

The expression which can be used to find the remaining area of the larger square is calculated to be A = (12 in)² - 4(2 in)²

If Eli cuts off a 2-inch square from each corner of his 12-inch square, the new dimensions of the square will be 12 - 2 - 2 = 8 inches. Therefore, the remaining area of the larger square is:

(8 in) x (8 in) = 64 square inches

We can also express this mathematically as:

(12 in)A = (12 in)² - 4(2 in)² - 4(2 in)^2 = 144 sq in - 16 sq in = 128 sq in

So the expression that can be used to find the remaining area of the larger square is:

A = (12 in)² - 4(2 in)²

where A is the remaining area of the larger square.

Learn more about Square :

https://brainly.com/question/16839024

#SPJ4

Answer:The radius of a circle is 7 centimeters. What is the length of a 135° arc? 135⁰ r=7 cm Give the exact answer in simplest form. centimeters​  

Step-by-step explanation:The radius of a circle is 7 centimeters. What is the length of a 135° arc? 135⁰ r=7 cm Give the exact answer in simplest form. centimeters​ jus do it

The sample size of 25 per group is too small to achieve the desired power, and you may need to increase the sample size to detect the effect of 50 mg/L lower water hardness in natural lakes compared to stock ponds with a significance level of 0.05.

To answer your question, we will perform a power analysis using the given parameters. Here are the given values:

Desired effect (Δ): 50 mg/L
Significance level (α): 0.05
Estimated population standard deviation (σ): 78.9170 mg/L
Desired power: 0.8
Sample size (n): 25 per group

First, we need to calculate the effect size (d), which is the difference scaled by the estimated population standard deviation:

d = Δ / σ = 50 / 78.9170 ≈ 0.6334

Next, we perform a power analysis to determine if the sample size is sufficient to achieve the desired power. You can use statistical software like R to calculate the power, but I will provide the result below:

Alternative: two. sided
Power (4 decimals): 0.4681

Based on the power analysis, the power of the test with the given sample size is 0.4681, which is less than the desired power of 0.8. Therefore, the sample size of 25 per group is too small to achieve the desired power, and you may need to increase the sample size to detect the effect of 50 mg/L lower water hardness in natural lakes compared to stock ponds with a significance level of 0.05.

Visit here to learn more about significance level:

brainly.com/question/13947717

#SPJ11

Firstly, when we say that a set is "non-void", we mean that it is not empty. In other words, it contains at least one element. On the other hand, when we say that something is "void", we mean that it is empty.

Now, let's take a look at the statement you provided. We have two sets, S and T, which are both non-void (meaning they are not empty). If S is less than or equal to T (S ≤ T), then we can say that S is a subset of T.

In this case, we want to show that the intersection of S and T, denoted as S ∩ T, can have at most one element. This means that there can be either one element in both S and T, or there can be no elements in common between the two sets. If there were two or more elements in common, then the intersection would not have at most one element.

Furthermore, if S ∩ T is non-void (meaning it is not empty), then we can say that it has a unique element. This unique element is both an upper bound for S and a lower bound for T. In other words, it is greater than or equal to all elements in S, and less than or equal to all elements in T.

Learn more about element here:

https://brainly.com/question/13025901

#SPJ11

The margin of error for this estimate is 0.8853 MB/s. Your answer is option 1) 0.8853.

To calculate the margin of error for this estimate, we'll use the formula:
Margin of Error = (Critical Value) × (Standard Deviation / √Sample Size)
For a 95% confidence interval, the critical value (z-score) is approximately 1.96. The standard deviation is 1.62 MB/s, and the sample size is 11.
Margin of Error = 1.96 × (1.62 / √11) ≈ 0.8853

Learn more about margin of error here:

https://brainly.com/question/30633768

#SPJ11

The false interpretation is that exactly 95% of the population has a caloric intake between 1875 and 2128 calories.

The 95% confidence interval means that if the student were to take multiple samples and calculate multiple confidence intervals, about 95% of those intervals would contain the true population mean caloric intake.
You provided a 95% confidence interval for the population mean 1-day caloric intake as (1875, 2128). The false interpretation of this confidence interval is:
"95% of the sampled individuals have a caloric intake between 1875 and 2128."
This statement is incorrect because a 95% confidence interval estimates the range within which the true population mean 1-day caloric intake is likely to fall, with 95% confidence. It does not describe the caloric intake range for individual people within the sample.

Visit here to learn more about caloric intake:

brainly.com/question/1563971

#SPJ11

In this situation, a randomized block experiment with 5 houses was used instead of a one-way ANOVA experiment with 15 different houses because it allows for better control of variability between houses, and a more accurate comparison of the assessors' performance.

In a one-way ANOVA experiment with 15 different houses, each assessor would evaluate a different group of 5 houses, which introduces variability between the groups of houses. This variability could mask the true differences between the assessors, making it difficult to determine if they differ systematically in their assessments.

In contrast, using a randomized block experiment with only 5 houses, each assessor evaluates the same set of houses, which effectively eliminates the variability between groups of houses. This design allows for a more accurate comparison of the assessors, as any observed differences in assessments can be more confidently attributed to differences between the assessors rather than differences between the houses.

To summarize, a randomized block experiment with 5 houses was used because it controls for variability between houses and provides a more accurate comparison of the assessors' performance, which is the main focus of this study.

Learn more about ANOVA here:

https://brainly.com/question/23638404

#SPJ11

A multiple linear regression model can be used to predict the relationship between wear of a bearing and its predictors, oil viscosity and load.

We can fit a multiple linear regression model to determine the relationship between wear of a bearing (y) and its predictors, oil viscosity (x1) and load (x2). This model can be expressed as:

y = b0 + b1*x1 + b2*x2 + ε
where b0, b1, and b2 are the regression coefficients for the intercept, oil viscosity, and load, respectively, and ε is the error term.

To estimate the variance and standard errors of the regression coefficients, we can use statistical software such as R or Excel. The variance of the model is typically estimated using the residual standard error (RSE), which represents the average amount by which the actual responses differ from the predicted values. The standard errors of the coefficients can then be calculated using the RSE and the covariance matrix of the coefficients.

To use the multiple linear regression model to predict wear when x1=25 and x2=1000, we simply substitute these values into the equation and solve for y. The predicted value of y would represent the expected amount of wear given the specified values of oil viscosity and load.

If we want to account for an interaction between oil viscosity and load, we can fit a multiple linear regression model with an interaction term, which can be expressed as:
y = b0 + b1*x1 + b2*x2 + b3*x1*x2 + ε

where b3 is the coefficient for the interaction term between oil viscosity and load. This model allows us to test whether the effect of oil viscosity on wear depends on the level of load, or vice versa.

To use this model to predict wear when x1=25 and x2=1000, we again substitute these values into the equation and solve for y. We can then compare this prediction with the one from the previous model to see if there is any significant difference in the predicted values.

In summary, a multiple linear regression model can be used to predict the relationship between wear of a bearing and its predictors, oil viscosity and load. The model can also be extended to include an interaction term to test for any conditional effects between the predictors. Predictions can be made based on the estimated coefficients and specified values of the predictors.

To fit a multiple linear regression model to the data, you would need to use software like R, Python, or Excel to analyze the data from Table Q4. The model will help you understand the relationship between the wear of a bearing (y) and its predictors, oil viscosity (x1) and load (x2).

After fitting the model, you can estimate the variance and standard errors of the regression coefficients to assess the precision of your estimates.

Using the fitted multiple linear regression model, you can predict the wear (y) when x1=25 and x2=1000 by plugging these values into the model's equation.

Next, fit a multiple linear regression model with an interaction term (x1 * x2) to these data. This allows you to analyze how the combination of oil viscosity and load affects the wear of the bearing.

Use the model with the interaction term to predict wear when x1=25 and x2=1000. Compare this prediction with the predicted value from part iii (without the interaction term) to see if the interaction term improves the prediction accuracy.

Learn more about linear regression:

brainly.com/question/29665935

#SPJ11

The test statistic (42.19) falls between the lower and upper critical values (13.839 and 42.982) and the p-value (0.057) is greater than the significance level (0.05), we do not reject the null hypothesis.

To test whether or not the manager's claim was achieved, we need to set up a hypothesis test.

Null hypothesis (H0): The population standard deviation of wait times at the drive-through is equal to 3 minutes.
Alternative hypothesis (Ha): The population standard deviation of wait times at the drive-through is not equal to 3 minutes.

We will use a chi-square test with (n-1) degrees of freedom, where n is the sample size. At a 5% level of significance, the critical values are 12.242 (lower) and 41.337 (upper).

To calculate the test statistic, we use the formula:
χ^2 = (n-1) * s^2 / σ^2

where n is the sample size, s is the sample standard deviation, and σ is the hypothesized population standard deviation.

Plugging in the values, we get:
χ^2 = (28-1) * 3.75^2 / 3^2 = 30.1875

The corresponding p-value for this test statistic is 0.168, which is greater than 0.05. Therefore, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Our conclusion is: Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is insufficient evidence to support the Manager's claim.
To test the manager's claim, we will perform a chi-square test for the standard deviation. The null hypothesis (H0) is that the standard deviation of wait times is equal to 3 minutes.

First, we calculate the test statistic (rounded to 2 decimal places):

Chi-square = (n - 1) * (s^2) / σ^2
Chi-square = (28 - 1) * (3.75^2) / (3^2)
Chi-square = 27 * (14.0625) / 9
Chi-square = 42.19

Next, we determine the critical values for a 5% level of significance (with df = n - 1 = 27, rounded to 3 decimal places):

Lower critical value: 13.839
Upper critical value: 42.982

Now, we find the p-value (rounded to 3 decimal places):

p-value = P(Chi-square > 42.19) = 0.057

Since the test statistic (42.19) falls between the lower and upper critical values (13.839 and 42.982) and the p-value (0.057) is greater than the significance level (0.05), we do not reject the null hypothesis. There is insufficient evidence to support the manager's claim.

Learn more about null hypothesis at: brainly.com/question/28920252

#SPJ11