Help tbh I have no idea to what to do rn

Answer:

a recursive formula gives the value of a specific term based on the previous term

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Search Results

Featured snippet from the web

A solution for an inequality in x is a number such that when we substitute that number for x we have a true statement. So, 4 is a solution for example 1, while 8 is not. The solution set of an inequality is the set of all solutions.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

5 PLZ GIVE BRAINLIEST

Step-by-step explanation:

83+37 = 120

120/5=24

Answer:

esto es salsa honestamente hermano como um, es realmente extraño por la forma en que mi nombre es Banana a la tasa de dólares estadounidenses dólares estadounidenses

[tex]\dfrac 1{3x^2} = -3\\\\\implies -9x^2 = 1\\\\\implies x^2 = -\dfrac 19\\\\\implies x = \pm\sqrt{-\dfrac 19} = \pm \dfrac 13i[/tex]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

x=rcosθ=4 cos (-40)=4 cos 40≈3.064

y=r sin θ=4 sin (-40)=-4 sin 40≈-2.571

the vector is (3.064,-2.571)

Answer:

-0.8 (A) -2.25 (B) -2 (C) (Look at explanation to see answers for first bubbles.)

Step-by-step explanation:

A:

1.4 - 2.2 = -0.8

B:

-0.75 - 1.5 = -2.25

C:

-0.2 - 1.8 = -2

Answer:

A. 1.4 - (-0.8) = 2.2

B. -0.75 - (-2.25) = 1.5

C. -0.2 - (1.6) = -1.8

Step-by-step explanation:

i just took the test on edge, and got it right (pls mark me as brainliest)

It helps to set up a two way table as shown below. Such tables compare 2 different variables. In this case, we're comparing the variables "working status" and "age".

Specifically, the working status separates the men into "working vs non-working". The age variable splits the men into groups of "35 or younger" and "over 35". Usually, but not always, each variable will take on two values.

Let's say this town had 1000 married men. 80% of this is 0.80*1000 = 800 to indicate there are 800 married working men. So we write this in the "total" column for the "working" row. This leaves 1000-800 = 200 nonworking married men, which will go right under the 800.

We're told that 75% of the married men are over 35, so 0.75*1000 = 750 married men are over 35. This goes in the "total" row for the "over 35" column. There are 1000-750 = 250 married men who are 35 and under.

As you can see, the stuff in the total column and the total row must add back to the grand total of 1000 married men overall.

--------------------------------

Another bit of info given is that "Among the working married men, 70% are over 35". We'll only focus on the "working" row. We have 800 total and 70% of this is 0.70*800 = 560 which is the number of working married men over 35. This leaves 800-560 = 240 married men who are not over 35.

At this point, we have 2 spots left in the table. Through guess and check, or using algebra, you should find that there are 190 non-working men over 35 and 10 non-working men who aren't over 35. Make sure that each row and column total checks out.

--------------------------------

By now, the table is fully filled out. See below.

Your teacher now asks "what proportion of non-working married men are over 35 years old?" which means we'll only focus on the "non-working" row. There are 200 men total here, and of this total, 190 are over 35.

So, 190/200 = 0.95 = 95% of the non-working married men are over 35.

Answer:

8800

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

-x=16

x=-16

Step-by-step explanation:

That is the Answer

Answer:

$7.01

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

$7.01

Step-by-step explanation:

You have seven whole dollars, which goes before the decimal point, then your cents go behind the decimal point.

Answer:

the slope or rate of change is 8 over 6 or 4 over 3 4/3

Answer:

the slope or rate of change is 8 over 6 or 4 over 3 4/3

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Sin = Opp/Hyp

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

opposite over hypotenuse

Answer: I can help!

The answer is (B)

The answer is (B) because if you take 921 and remove all the other zeros which are just place holders, you get 9 move in the decimal and now there is 9.21 then you see how many zeros there are ans that gives you 3.

For the second one the answer is (A)

If you were to look up how much 2000% is you would get 20% so therefore that is the answer.

I hope you do good!

My apologies if anything is wrong.

Answer:

4 weeks

Step-by-step explanation:

Wyatt's equation:

t=14w+40

Julian's equation:

t=19j+20

Since both equations equal the same thing, or t, we can equal them against each other as 1 equation

14t+40=19t+20

(subtract 20 from both sides)

14t+20=19t

(subtract 14t from both sides)

20=5t

(divide both sides by 5)

t=4 weeks

Answer:

=$32

Step-by-step explanation:

Principal Amount=$400

Rate=4%

Time=2 Years

Interest=?

           =RPT/100

           =4x400x2/100

          =$32

                        ....................................................................

[tex]\qquad[/tex]____________________

It’s given–

[tex] \bf{\underline{\underline{\dag According\ to\ the\ question:-}}} [/tex]

[tex]\qquad[/tex][tex] \purple{\bf\longrightarrow {Volume = 7^3} }[/tex]

[tex]\qquad[/tex][tex] \purple{\bf \longrightarrow Volume =343\: cm^3}[/tex]

Answer:

324

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: C. (1, 0.80) represents the unit rate

Step-by-step explanation:

Please attach all answer options.

Answer:

Only b is correctly simplified.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

2n + 9 = - 25

Step-by-step explanation:

let the number be n then twice the number is 2n

The sum of 2n and 9 is 2n + 9

the result is - 25 , that is

2n + 9 = - 25

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The sum of twice a number and 9 is -25."

2x + 9 = -25

2x = -34

x = -17

-----------------------------------------

check

2 * (-17) + 9 = -25

-25 = -25

the answer is good

Answer:

(4, -3)

Step-by-step explanation:

X is 4 units away from y=1, so 4 units further away is -3. The Y value of the point stays the same.

Answer:

30

Step-by-step explanation:

130 + 20 = 150

All angles added together in a triangle equal 180 so...

180 - 150 = 30

I hope this helps!

Answer:

It is a fraction

. f (x) = x +12×2-x-1 is an example of rational function.

It has numerator and denominator properties.

vertical asymptotes is the another property of rational function.

Numerater and denominator both are polynomials.

function expressed by numerator and denominator with ratio.

The smallest integer from the given set {-17, -7, -12, 2} is -17, making option D the right choice.

An integer is a whole number that can be positive, negative, or zero and is not a fraction.

The integer values are in the following order: negative, zero, then positive.

The real value of a negative integer decrease as the number increases.

For positive integers, the real value increases as the number increases.

In the question, we have been asked for the integer with the smallest value in the set {-17, -7, -12, 2}.

As discussed above, we know the order for negative and positive integers.

Thus, arranging the set in ascending order, we get:

-17 < -12 < -7 < 2.

Thus, the smallest integer from the given set {-17, -7, -12, 2} is -17. Hence, option D is the right choice.

Learn more about integers at

https://brainly.com/question/12399107

#SPJ1

Answer:

y= -10x-24

Step-by-step explanation:

To write the linear equation, first find the slope.

[tex]m=\frac{y2-y1}{x2-x1}[/tex]

Let's pick the first two x and y values as our coordinate points.

(1, -34) (2, -44)

[tex]\frac{-44-(-34)}{2-1} =-10[/tex]

The slope is -10.

Use the point-slope formula to write the equation.

y-y1= m(x-x1)

y-(-34)= -10(x-1)

y+34= -10x+10

y= -10x-24

Answer:

the answer is x4/19P because u add the top of the numerator and times the denominator