GIVING BRAINLIST!!!
Danielle borrows $2.500 from the bank at 6%
simple interest for 5 years. How much is
Danielle going to pay in interest?
6. (Show work there)
all

9 × 13ˣ = 9 × exp(ln(13ˣ ))

… = 9 × exp(x ln(13))

… = A₀ × exp(kx)

so that

A₀ = 9

k = ln(13)

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

A) Find the total minutes that Anna walked.To find the average number of minutes, divide the total minutes by total number of days

B) Average number of minutes =

[tex]\frac{15*9 + 30*5 + 40*7 + 45*3 + 50*6}{30}\\\\= \frac{135 + 150 + 280 + 135 + 300}{30}\\\\=\frac{1000}{30}\\\\= 33. 33[/tex]

Answer:B

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

By the Pythagorean Theorem we know

h^2=x^2+y^2 (where h is the hypotenuse and x and y are sides of a right triangle)

w^2+18^2=30^2

w^2=30^2-18^2

w^2=900-324

w^2=576

w=24 in

Answer: You call the 9 a base.

Step-by-step explanation: 3 is the percentage or part of the whole or base.

Answer:

9 is the base of the statement.

Step-by-step explanation:

Since 30% is the rate which shows a percent symbol. 9 is the base which is the basis of the statement. Then 3 is the percentage you got from the 30% of 9.

Answer:

x = 7[tex]\sqrt{2}[/tex] and y = 7

Step-by-step explanation:

Since this is 45 45 90 triangle, each leg is the same length so y = 7 too and x is always [tex]a\sqrt{2}[/tex]  so x = 7[tex]\sqrt{2}[/tex]

The values of [tex]x[/tex] and [tex]y[/tex] are required.

The required values are

[tex]x=9.9\ \text{units}[/tex]

[tex]y=7\ \text{units}[/tex]

The given triangle is a right angled triangle.

Two given angles are [tex]90^{\circ}[/tex] and [tex]45^{\circ}[/tex]

The sum of the angles is [tex]180^{\circ}[/tex]

The missing angle is

[tex]180-(90+45)=45^{\circ}[/tex]

Since, the two angles are equal the side opposite the angles will also be equal.

So,

[tex]y=7[/tex]

Applying the Pythagoras theorem.

[tex]7^2+7^2=x^2\\\Rightarrow x=\sqrt{7^2+7^2}\\\Rightarrow x\approx 9.9[/tex]

Learn more:

https://brainly.com/question/17307037?referrer=searchResults

Answer:

2.5 is the correct answer.

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope this helped Mark BRAINLEST!!!

Answer:

3x - 5 > 2/3x

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

D 150 thats easy multiply or add

Answer:

15°

Step-by-step explanation:

120° and 8x are vertically opposite angles, which are always equal.

=> 8x = 120°

=> x = 120/8

=> x = 15°

3(7d + 4e) = 3 • 7d + 3 • 4e = 21d + 12e

Answer:

it is eather d or b

Step-by-step explanation:

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the shared amount be 2x and 3x Then

2x + 3x = £ 250

5x = £ 250

x =£250/ 5

x = £ 50

Now

2x = 2 *£ 50 = £ 100

3x = 3 * £50 = £150

Hope it will help :)❤

Step-by-step explanation:

In simplify form: 1.3x+2.4-6.1-3.2 = -4.8x-0.8

or factor the expression: =-4/5×(6x+1) Alternate form: -0.8(6x+1). I hope this helps.

Answer:

He will pay $14 to go on 7 rides with admission he will pay a total of $54.

Step-by-step explanation:

Admission-40

One ride-2

40+(2x7)=54

Answer:

the pot needs now 214 milleters of water

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

False

Step-by-step explanation:

Pos and negs cannot be perfect square trinomials

Answer:

96 cookies.

Step-by-step explanation:

I don't love the wording of the question, but here's what I see:

Lisa Friday: 24

Lisa Saturday: 36

Maria total: 36

Cookie total: 96

-----------------------------------------------------

I can't really tell from how the question is worded if Maria's total was the total of what Lisa made, and she did it all on Saturday, or if Maria baked Lisa's Saturday number of cookies.

If 96 is the wrong answer, then try:

Lisa Friday: 24

Lisa Saturday: 36

Maria total: 60

Cookie total: 120

Answer:

150

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

72 M

Step-by-step explanation:

You have to multiply 12 by 6,and to make it easier,you can draw a multiplication chart type thing,where once you drew all of the lines,it would make squares.Count all the squares and that's your answer.

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

..............................

Answer:

25 feet

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that Sally is at the park standing directly under a kite which is 20 feet overheadSally's dad is flying the kitc and is standing 15 feet from her If both are on level ground, how long is the kite string in feet?

To calculate the length of the kite string, we will apply pythagorean theorem.

Length = sqrt ( 20^2 + 15^2 )

Length = sqrt ( 400 + 225 )

Length = sqrt ( 625 )

Length = 25 feet.

Therefore, the length of the kite string is 25 feet.

Answer:

No solution

Step-by-step explanation:

Use substitution

2x+1=2x-1

Subtract 2x on both sides

1= -1

No solution

Answer:

It is a really idealistic way to estimate probability.

It usually works well for random events where there is no restriction like:

"There are N elements in a set, the probability of randomly selecting any element is the same (so there is no restriction) meaning that for every single element, the probability is 1/N.

Now suppose that there are K elements (K < N) with a given characteristic, then the probability of randomly selecting one of the K elements out of the sett with N elements is equal to K times the probability of each element, this is:

P = K*(1/N) = K/N"

Then if a dice has 6 possible outputs, and we want to find the probability of getting a 3 or a 5, we need to find the quotient between the outcomes where we get a 3 or a 5 (2) and the total number of outcomes (6)

P = 2/6

Now let's go to the case in the problem:

We know that out of the last 20 games, your team won 18.

Then yes, your team won (18/20)*100% = 90% of their played games.

Does this mean tath the probability of winning the next game is 90%?

Well no, because this is not a random selection, there are a lot of other things needed to analyze, as the win rate of the other team (suppose that the other team won 14 of their last 20 games, then their win rate is (16/20)*100% = 70%

Does this mean that the probability where our team wins is 90%, and the probability of the enemy team winning is 70%?

Well no, this makes no sense at all, and this is why this method is not a good way to estimate probability in complex cases like this one.