Given the following: f(x) = 3x-7; g(x) =
13x-2; and h(x) = 6x
h(h(g(x)) = 468x - 72
True or False

We have found that the solutions of the given equation satisfying x > 0, y > 0, and z > 0 are (2, 1, 2√2) and (6, 1, 2√3).

The given equation is x² + 3y² = z², and the conditions are x > 0, y > 0, and z > 0. We need to find all the solutions of this equation that satisfy these conditions.

To solve the equation, let's consider odd values of x and y, where x > y.

Let's start with x = 1 and y = 1. Substituting these values into the equation, we get:

1² + 3(1)² = z²

1 + 3 = z²

4 = z²

z = 2√2

As x and y are odd, x² is also odd. This means the value of z² should be even. Therefore, the value of z must also be even.

Let's check for another set of odd values, x = 3 and y = 1:

3² + 3(1)² = z²

9 + 3 = z²

12 = z²

z = 2√3

So, the solutions for the given equation with x > 0, y > 0, and z > 0 are (2, 1, 2√2) and (6, 1, 2√3).

Therefore, the solutions to the given equation that fulfil x > 0, y > 0, and z > 0 are (2, 1, 22) and (6, 1, 23).

Learn more about equation

https://brainly.com/question/29538993

#SPJ11

The sequences are:1. Divergent2. Convergent (limit = 4/9)3. Convergent (limit = 1/4)

The following sequences are:

Aₙ = 9 + 4n³/n + 3n²  

Nₙ = Aₙ / N = (9 + 4n³/n + 3n²) / n³/9n+4  

Xₖ = Xₙ = n³ + 3n/Aₙ + n⁴

Let us determine whether each of the given sequences converges or diverges:

1. The first sequence is given by Aₙ = 9 + 4n³/n + 3n²Aₙ = 4n³/n + 3n² + 9 / 1

We can say that 4n³/n + 3n² → ∞ as n → ∞

So, the sequence diverges.

2. The second sequence is  

Nₙ = Aₙ / N = (9 + 4n³/n + 3n²) / n³/9n+4

Nₙ = (4/9)(n⁴)/(n⁴) + 4/3n → 4/9 as n → ∞

So, the sequence converges and its limit is 4/9.3. The third sequence is  

Xₖ = Xₙ = n³ + 3n/Aₙ + n⁴Xₖ = Xₙ = (n³/n³)(1 + 3/n²) / (4n³/n³ + 3n²/n³ + 9/n³) + n⁴/n³

The first term converges to 1 and the third term converges to 0. So, the given sequence converges and its limit is 1 / 4.

You can learn more about Convergent at: brainly.com/question/31756849

#SPJ11

The three consecutive even integers are -38, -36, and -34.

Given f(x) = 2x-3 and g(x) = 5x + 4, the composite of f° g(x) = f(g(x)) can be calculated as follows:

Solution: A. Composite (f° g)(x):f(x) = 2x - 3 and g(x) = 5x + 4

Let's substitute the value of g(x) in f(x) to obtain the composite of f° g(x) = f(g(x))f(g(x))

= f(5x + 4)

= 2(5x + 4) - 3

= 10x + 5

B. Composite (g° f)(x):f(x)

= 2x - 3 and g(x)

= 5x + 4

Let's substitute the value of f(x) in g(x) to obtain the composite of g° f(x) = g(f(x))g(f(x))

= g(2x - 3)

= 5(2x - 3) + 4

= 10x - 11

C. Composite (f° g)(-3):

Let's calculate composite of f° g(-3)

= f(g(-3))f(g(-3))

= f(5(-3) + 4)

= -10 - 3

= -13

Given f(x) = x² - 8x - 9 and

g(x) = x²+ 6x + 5,

the composite of f° g(x) = f(g(x)) can be calculated as follows:

Solution: A. Composite (fog)(0):f(x) = x² - 8x - 9 and g(x)

= x² + 6x + 5

Let's substitute the value of g(x) in f(x) to obtain the composite of f° g(x) = f(g(x))f(g(x))

= f(x² + 6x + 5)

= (x² + 6x + 5)² - 8(x² + 6x + 5) - 9

= x⁴ + 12x³ - 31x² - 182x - 184

B. Composite (fog)(1):

Let's calculate composite of f° g(1) = f(g(1))f(g(1))

= f(1² + 6(1) + 5)= f(12)

= 12² - 8(12) - 9

= 111

C. Composite (g° f)(1):

Let's calculate composite of g° f(1) = g(f(1))g(f(1))

= g(2 - 3)

= g(-1)

= (-1)² + 6(-1) + 5= 0

The length and width of an envelope can be calculated as follows:

Solution: Let's assume the width of the envelope to be x.

The length of the envelope will be (x + 4) cm, as per the given conditions.

The area of the envelope is given as 96 cm².

So, the equation for the area of the envelope can be written as: x(x + 4) = 96x² + 4x - 96

= 0(x + 12)(x - 8) = 0

Thus, the width of the envelope is 8 cm and the length of the envelope is (8 + 4) = 12 cm.

Three consecutive even integers whose square difference is 76 can be calculated as follows:

Solution: Let's assume the three consecutive even integers to be x, x + 2, and x + 4.

The square of the third integer is 76 more than the square of the second integer.x² + 8x + 16

= (x + 2)² + 76x² + 8x + 16

= x² + 4x + 4 + 76x² + 4x - 56

= 0x² + 38x - 14x - 56

= 0x(x + 38) - 14(x + 38)

= 0(x - 14)(x + 38)

= 0x = 14 or

x = -38

To know more about integers visit:

https://brainly.com/question/490943

#SPJ11

The earliest time the operation can continue is approximately 1.03 minutes. According to the given rational function C(t) = 3t/(t^2 + 3), the concentration of the antibiotic in the blood can be determined.

The operation can begin when the concentration reaches 0.5 g/mL. By solving the equation, it is determined that the earliest time the operation can continue is approximately 1.03 minutes.

To find the earliest time the operation can continue, we need to solve the equation C(t) = 0.5. By substituting 0.5 for C(t) in the rational function, we get the equation 0.5 = 3t/(t^2 + 3).

To solve this equation, we can cross-multiply and rearrange terms to obtain 0.5(t^2 + 3) = 3t. Simplifying further, we have t^2 + 3 - 6t = 0.

Now, we have a quadratic equation, which can be solved using factoring, completing the square, or the quadratic formula. In this case, let's use the quadratic formula: t = (-b ± √(b^2 - 4ac)) / (2a).

Comparing the quadratic equation to our equation, we have a = 1, b = -6, and c = 3. Plugging these values into the quadratic formula, we get t = (-(-6) ± √((-6)^2 - 4(1)(3))) / (2(1)).

Simplifying further, t = (6 ± √(36 - 12)) / 2, which gives us t = (6 ± √24) / 2. The square root of 24 can be simplified to 2√6.

So, t = (6 ± 2√6) / 2, which simplifies to t = 3 ± √6. We can approximate this value to t ≈ 3 + 2.45 or t ≈ 3 - 2.45. Therefore, the earliest time the operation can continue is approximately 1.03 minutes.

To learn more about quadratic click here: brainly.com/question/22364785

#SPJ11

The statement "The segment from the center of a square to the corner cannot be called the 'radius' of the square" is false.

The term "radius" is commonly used in the context of circles and spheres, not squares. In geometry, the radius refers to the distance from the center of a circle or a sphere to any point on its boundary. It is a measure of the length between the center and any point on the perimeter of the circle or sphere.

In the case of a square, the equivalent term for the segment from the center to the corner is called the "diagonal." The diagonal of a square is the line segment that connects two opposite corners of the square, passing through its center. It is twice the length of the side of the square.

To know more about the diagonal of a square, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/2693832#

#SPJ11

For the given continuous data distribution with frequencies, we need to determine the quartile deviation and the value of Q-1.

To calculate the quartile deviation, we first find the cumulative frequencies for the given intervals: 3, 8 (3 + 5), 15 (3 + 5 + 7), and 16 (3 + 5 + 7 + 1). Next, we determine the values of Q1 and Q3.

Using the cumulative frequencies, we find that Q1 falls within the interval 20-30. Interpolating within this interval using the formula Q1 = L + ((n/4) - F) x (I / f), where L is the lower limit of the interval, F is the cumulative frequency of the preceding interval, I is the width of the interval, and f is the frequency of the interval, we obtain Q1 = 22.

For the quartile deviation, we calculate the difference between Q3 and Q1. However, since the options provided do not include the quartile deviation, we cannot determine its exact value.

In summary, the value of Q1 is 22, but the quartile deviation cannot be determined without additional information.

Learn more about continuous data distribution: brainly.in/question/34678706

#SPJ11

If the coefficient of x² in the equation f(x) = 3x² is changed to 3, the graph will be affected if the coefficient of x² is changed to the parabola will be narrower. Thus, option A is correct.

A. The parabola will be narrower.

The coefficient of x² determines the "steepness" or "narrowness" of the parabola. When the coefficient is increased, the parabola becomes narrower because it grows faster in the upward direction.

B. The parabola will not be wider.

Increasing the coefficient of x² does not result in a wider parabola. Instead, it makes the parabola narrower.

C. The parabola will not be translated down.

Changing the coefficient of x² does not affect the vertical translation (up or down) of the parabola. The translation is determined by the constant term or any term that adds or subtracts a value from the function.

D. The parabola will not be translated up.

Similarly, changing the coefficient of x² does not impact the vertical translation of the parabola. Any translation up or down is determined by other terms in the function.

In conclusion, if the coefficient of x² in the equation f(x) = x² is changed to 3, the parabola will become narrower, but there will be no translation in the vertical direction. Thus, option A is correct.

To know more about parabola refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/21685473#

#SPJ11

Complete Question:

If the graph of f(x) = x², how will the graph be affected if the coefficient of x² is changed to 3?

A. The parabola will be narrower.

B. The parabola will be wider.

C. The parabola will be translated down.

D. The parabola will be translated up.

The partition of matrix B into 2x2 blocks is:

B = [1 2 | 3 4 ;

3 4 | 5 6 ;

------------

1 3 | 4 1 ;

3 4 | 6 3]

To construct the partition of the matrix B into 2x2 blocks, we divide the matrix into smaller submatrices. Each submatrix will be a 2x2 block. Here's how it would look:

B = [B₁ B₂;

B₃ B₄]

where:

B₁ = [1 2; 3 4]

B₂ = [3 4; 5 6]

B₃ = [1 3; 3 4]

B₄ = [4 1; 6 3]

Know more about matrix here:

https://brainly.com/question/29132693

#SPJ11

The LU-decomposition of the matrix A is L = [1 0; 5 1] and U = [19 0; -3 1].

The given problem involves finding the LU-decomposition of a matrix A and solving the equation Ax = b.

In the LU-decomposition process, the matrix A is decomposed into the product of two matrices, L and U, where L is a lower triangular matrix and U is an upper triangular matrix.

This decomposition allows for easier solving of linear systems of equations. Once the LU-decomposition of A is obtained, the equation Ax = b can be solved by first solving the system Ly = b for y using forward substitution, and then solving the system Ux = y for x using back substitution.

By performing these steps, the solution to the equation Ax = b can be determined.

Learn more about LU-decomposition

brainly.com/question/32646516

#SPJ11

185 said they like dogs, 170 said they like cats, 86 said they liked both cats and dogs, and 74 said they don't like cats or dogs. The number of people who were surveyed is 515.

The number of people who were surveyed can be found by adding the number of people who liked dogs, the number of people who liked cats, the number of people who liked both, and the number of people who did not like either. So, the total number of people surveyed can be found as follows:

Total number of people who like dogs = 185

Total number of people who like cats = 170

Total number of people who like both = 86

Total number of people who do not like cats or dogs = 74

The total number of people surveyed = Number of people who like dogs + Number of people who like cats + Number of people who like both + Number of people who do not like cats or dogs

= 185 + 170 + 86 + 74= 515

You can learn more about the survey at: brainly.com/question/31624121

#SPJ11

The construction on page 734 involves a step-by-step process to solve a specific problem or demonstrate a mathematical concept.

The construction on page 734 is a methodical procedure used in mathematics to solve a particular problem or illustrate a concept. It typically involves a series of steps that are carefully chosen and executed to achieve the desired outcome.

The purpose of the construction can vary depending on the specific context, but it generally aims to provide a visual representation, demonstrate a theorem, or solve a given problem.

In the explanation provided on page 734, the construction steps are detailed and justified. Each step is crucial to the overall process and contributes to the final result.

The author likely presents the reasoning behind each step to help the reader understand the underlying principles and logic behind the construction.

It is important to note that without specific details about the construction mentioned on page 734, it is challenging to provide a more specific explanation. However, it is essential to carefully follow the given steps and their justifications, as they are likely designed to ensure accuracy and validity in the mathematical context.

Learn more about Construction

brainly.com/question/33434682

#SPJ11

1)

(a) A ∪ E:

A ∪ E = {3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10}

Interval notation: [3, 10]

(b) (A ∩ B)':

(A ∩ B)' = U \ (A ∩ B) = U \ (5, 7]

Interval notation: (-∞, 5] ∪ (7, ∞)

(c) (A \ D) ∩ (B \ E):

A \ D = {3, 4, 7}

B \ E = (5, 6]

(A \ D) ∩ (B \ E) = {7} ∩ (5, 6] = {7}

Interval notation: {7}

2)

(a) The largest possible domain for F(x) = 2x² - 6x + 8 is U, the universal set.

Domain: U = [0, ∞) (interval notation)

Since F(x) is a quadratic function, its graph is a parabola opening upwards, and the range is determined by the vertex. In this case, the vertex occurs at the minimum point of the parabola.

To find the largest possible range, we can find the y-coordinate of the vertex.

The x-coordinate of the vertex is given by x = -b/(2a), where a = 2 and b = -6.

x = -(-6)/(2*2) = 3/2

Plugging x = 3/2 into the function, we get:

F(3/2) = 2(3/2)² - 6(3/2) + 8 = 2(9/4) - 9 + 8 = 9/2 - 9 + 8 = 1/2

The y-coordinate of the vertex is 1/2.

Therefore, the largest possible range for F(x) is [1/2, ∞) (interval notation).

(b) The function G(x) = (4x + 3)/(2x - 1) is undefined when the denominator 2x - 1 is equal to 0.

Solve 2x - 1 = 0 for x:

2x - 1 = 0

2x = 1

x = 1/2

Therefore, the function G(x) is undefined at x = 1/2.

The largest possible domain for G(x) is the set of all real numbers except x = 1/2.

Domain: (-∞, 1/2) ∪ (1/2, ∞) (interval notation)

Learn more about Interval notation here

https://brainly.com/question/29184001

#SPJ11

Mathematics is an interesting subject that is constantly evolving and changing. Researching different areas of Mathematics Teaching can help to advance teaching techniques and increase the knowledge base for both students and teachers.

There are several researchable areas of Mathematics Teaching. One area of research is in the development of new teaching strategies and methods.

Another area of research is in the creation of new mathematical tools and technologies.

A third area of research is in the evaluation of the effectiveness of existing teaching methods and tools.

A fourth area of research is in the identification of key skills and knowledge areas that are essential for success in mathematics.

Finally, a fifth area of research is in the exploration of different ways to engage students and motivate them to learn mathematics.

Overall, there are many different researchable areas of Mathematics Teaching.

By exploring these areas, teachers and researchers can help to advance the field and improve the quality of education for students.

To learn more on Researching :

https://brainly.com/question/25257437

#SPJ11

The unique solution to the initial value problem is: y = 1 + x + 6x².

To solve the non-homogeneous problem y" = 12(2x²), let's go through the steps:

1) Homogeneous problem:

The homogeneous equation is y" = 0. The auxiliary equation is ar² + br + c = 0.

2) The roots of the auxiliary equation:

Since the coefficient of the y" term is 0, the auxiliary equation simplifies to just c = 0. Therefore, the root of the auxiliary equation is r = 0.

3) Fundamental set of solutions:

For the homogeneous problem y" = 0, since we have a repeated root r = 0, the fundamental set of solutions is Y₁ = 1 and Y₂ = x. So the complementary solution is Yc = C₁(1) + C₂(x) = C₁ + C₂x, where C₁ and C₂ are arbitrary constants.

4) Particular solution:

To find a particular solution, we can use the method of undetermined coefficients. Since the non-homogeneous term is 12(2x²), we assume a particular solution of the form yp = Ax² + Bx + C, where A, B, and C are constants to be determined.

Taking the derivatives of yp, we have:

yp' = 2Ax + B,

yp" = 2A.

Substituting these into the non-homogeneous equation, we get:

2A = 12(2x²),

A = 12x² / 2,

A = 6x².

Therefore, the particular solution is yp = 6x².

5) General solution and initial value problem:

The general solution is the sum of the complementary solution and the particular solution:

y = Yc + yp = C₁ + C₂x + 6x².

To solve the initial value problem y(0) = 1 and y'(0) = 1, we substitute the initial conditions into the general solution:

y(0) = C₁ + C₂(0) + 6(0)² = C₁ = 1,

y'(0) = C₂ + 12(0) = C₂ = 1.

Therefore, the unique solution to the initial value problem is:

y = 1 + x + 6x².

Learn more about unique solution from this link:

https://brainly.com/question/9201878

#SPJ11

Based on the information the conclusion of the symbolized argument is: R ⊃ (Y ⊃ K).

Assume the premise: R ⊃ X. (Given)

Assume the premise: (R · X) ⊃ B. (Given)

Assume the premise: (Y · B) ⊃ K. (Given)

Assume the negation of the conclusion: ¬[R ⊃ (Y ⊃ K)].

By the rule of Material Implication (MI), from step 1, we can infer ¬R ∨ X.

By the rule of Material Implication (MI), we can infer R → X.

By the rule of Exportation, from step 6, we can infer [(R · X) ⊃ B] → (R ⊃ X).

By the rule of Hypothetical Syllogism (HS), we can infer (R ⊃ X).

By the rule of Hypothetical Syllogism (HS), we can infer R. Since we have derived R, which matches the conclusion R ⊃ (Y ⊃ K), we can conclude that R ⊃ (Y ⊃ K) is valid based on the given premises.

Therefore, the conclusion of the symbolized argument is: R ⊃ (Y ⊃ K).

Learn more about symbolized argument on

https://brainly.com/question/29955858

#SPJ4

The conclusion of the given symbolized argument is "R ⊃ (Y ⊃ K)", which indicates that if R is true, then the implication of Y leading to K is also true.

Using the 18 rules of inference, the conclusion of the given symbolized argument "R ⊃ X, (R · X) ⊃ B, (Y · B) ⊃ K / R ⊃ (Y ⊃ K)" can be derived as "R ⊃ (Y ⊃ K)".

To derive the conclusion, we can apply the rules of inference systematically:

Premise 1: R ⊃ X (Given)

Premise 2: (R · X) ⊃ B (Given)

Premise 3: (Y · B) ⊃ K (Given)

By applying the implication introduction (→I) rule, we can derive the intermediate conclusion:

4) (R · X) ⊃ (Y ⊃ K) (Using premise 3 and the →I rule, assuming Y · B as the antecedent and K as the consequent)

Next, we can apply the hypothetical syllogism (HS) rule to combine premises 2 and 4:

5) R ⊃ (Y ⊃ K) (Using premises 2 and 4, with (R · X) as the antecedent and (Y ⊃ K) as the consequent)

Finally, by applying the transposition rule (Trans), we can rearrange the implication in conclusion 5:

6) R ⊃ (Y ⊃ K) (Using the Trans rule to convert (Y ⊃ K) to (~Y ∨ K))

Therefore, the conclusion of the given symbolized argument is "R ⊃ (Y ⊃ K)", which indicates that if R is true, then the implication of Y leading to K is also true.

Learn more about 18 rules of inference from the given link:

https://brainly.com/question/30558649

#SPJ11

The result of dividing (4x^3 − 2x^2 − 3x + 1) by (x + 3) is a quotient of 4x^2 - 14x + 37 with a remainder of -116.

When dividing polynomials, we use long division. Let's break down the steps:

Divide the first term of the dividend (4x^3) by the first term of the divisor (x) to get 4x^2.

Multiply the entire divisor (x + 3) by the quotient from step 1 (4x^2) to get 4x^3 + 12x^2.

Subtract this result from the original dividend: (4x^3 - 2x^2 - 3x + 1) - (4x^3 + 12x^2) = -14x^2 - 3x + 1.

Bring down the next term (-14x^2).

Divide this term (-14x^2) by the first term of the divisor (x) to get -14x.

Multiply the entire divisor (x + 3) by the new quotient (-14x) to get -14x^2 - 42x.

Subtract this result from the previous result: (-14x^2 - 3x + 1) - (-14x^2 - 42x) = 39x + 1.

Bring down the next term (39x).

Divide this term (39x) by the first term of the divisor (x) to get 39.

Multiply the entire divisor (x + 3) by the new quotient (39) to get 39x + 117.

Subtract this result from the previous result: (39x + 1) - (39x + 117) = -116.

The quotient is 4x^2 - 14x + 37, and the remainder is -116.

Therefore, the result of dividing (4x^3 − 2x^2 − 3x + 1) by (x + 3) is 4x^2 - 14x + 37 with a remainder of -116.

Learn more about quotient here: brainly.com/question/16134410

#SPJ11

The maximal rate of change is given by the magnitude of the gradient vector: ||∇f||. Here, F = [T, y³, 3] is the vector field, and dS is the outward-pointing vector normal to the surface S. Therefore, the answer for option b is Flux = ∬S F · dS

So, let's calculate the gradient vector (∇f) and evaluate it at the point [x₀, y₀, z₀].

∇f = [∂f/∂x, ∂f/∂y, ∂f/∂z]

The maximal rate of change is given by the magnitude of the gradient vector: ||∇f||.

(b) To calculate the flux of the vector field F(x, y, z) = [T, y³, 3] across the surface S, we can use the surface integral:

Flux = ∬S F · dS

Here, F = [T, y³, 3] is the vector field, and dS is the outward-pointing vector normal to the surface S.

(c) To evaluate the surface integral ∬S fyz dS over the surface S, we need the parametric equations of the surface S.

Therefore, the answer for option b is Flux = ∬S F · dS

Learn more about gradient vector from the given link.

https://brainly.com/question/31583861

#SPJ11

No, a quadratic function does not always exceed a square root function. Whether a quadratic function exceeds a square root function depends on the specific equations of the functions and their respective domains. To provide a mathematical explanation, let's consider a specific example. Suppose we have the quadratic function f(x) = x^2 and the square root function g(x) = √x. We will compare these functions over a specific domain.

Let's consider the interval from x = 0 to x = 1. We can evaluate both functions at the endpoints and see which one is larger:

For f(x) = x^2:

f(0) = (0)^2 = 0

f(1) = (1)^2 = 1

For g(x) = √x:

g(0) = √(0) = 0

g(1) = √(1) = 1

As we can see, in this specific interval, the quadratic function and the square root function have equal values at both endpoints. Therefore, the quadratic function does not exceed the square root function in this particular case.

However, it's important to note that there may be other intervals or specific equations where the quadratic function does exceed the square root function. It ultimately depends on the specific equations and the range of values being considered.

Answer:

No, a quadratic function will not always exceed a square root function. There are certain values of x where the square root function will be greater than the quadratic function.

Step-by-step explanation:

The square root function is always increasing, while the quadratic function can be increasing, decreasing, or constant.

When the quadratic function is increasing, it will eventually exceed the square root function.

However, when the quadratic function is decreasing, it will eventually be less than the square root function.

Here is a mathematical example:

Quadratic function:[tex]f(x) = x^2[/tex]

Square root function: [tex]g(x) = \sqrt{x[/tex]

At x = 0, f(x) = 0 and g(x) = 0. Therefore, f(x) = g(x).

As x increases, f(x) increases faster than g(x). Therefore, f(x) will eventually exceed g(x).

At x = 4, f(x) = 16 and g(x) = 4. Therefore, f(x) > g(x).

As x continues to increase, f(x) will continue to increase, while g(x) will eventually decrease.

Therefore, there will be a point where f(x) will be greater than g(x).

In general, the quadratic function will exceed the square root function for sufficiently large values of x.

However, there will be a range of values of x where the square root function will be greater than the quadratic function.

The company can earn a maximum of $2760 if it sells 10 Tire X tires and 18 Tire Y tires.

A tire company sells two different tread patterns of tires. Tire X is priced at $75.00 and Tire Y is priced at $85.00. It is given that the three times the number of Tire Y sold must be less than or equal to twice the number of Tire X sold. The company has at most 300 tires to sell. Let the number of Tire X sold be x.

Then the number of Tire Y sold is 3y. The cost of the x Tire X and 3y Tire Y tires can be expressed as follows:

75x + 85(3y) ≤ 300 …(1)

75x + 255y ≤ 300

Divide both sides by 15. 5x + 17y ≤ 20

This is the required inequality that represents the number of tires sold.The given inequality 3y ≤ 2x can be re-written as follows: 2x - 3y ≥ 0 3y ≤ 2x ≤ 20, x ≤ 10, y ≤ 6

Therefore, the company can sell at most 10 Tire X tires and 18 Tire Y tires at the most.

Therefore, the maximum amount the company can earn is as follows:

Maximum earnings = (10 x $75) + (18 x $85) = $2760

Therefore, the company can earn a maximum of $2760 if it sells 10 Tire X tires and 18 Tire Y tires.

Know more about inequality here,

https://brainly.com/question/20383699

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Its rectangular prism trust me I did the quiz

The negations for each of the following statements are as follows:

a. None of the tests came back positive.

b. No tests came back positive.

c. All tests came back positive.

d. Some tests came back positive.

Statement a. All tests came back positive.The negation of the statement is: None of the tests came back positive.

Statement b. Some tests came back positive.The negation of the statement is: No tests came back positive.

Statement c. Some tests did not come back positive.The negation of the statement is: All tests came back positive.

Statement d. No tests came back positive.The negation of the statement is: Some tests came back positive.

Learn more about negation at

https://brainly.com/question/15354218

#SPJ11

The roots of the equation are;

a. (n +2)(n -8)

b. (x-5)(x-3)

From the information given, we have the expressions as;

f(x) = n² - 6n - 16

Using the factorization method, we have to find the pair factors of the product of the constant and x square, we have;

a. n² -8n + 2n - 16

Group in pairs, we have;

n(n -8) + 2(n -8)

Then, we get;

(n +2)(n -8)

b. y = x² - 8x + 15

Using the factorization method, we have;

x² - 5x - 3x + 15

group in pairs, we have;

x(x -5) - 3(x - 5)

(x-5)(x-3)

Learn more about factorization at: https://brainly.com/question/25829061

#SPJ1

A. Yes, someone can create a design on Desmos on the topic "zero hunger" using at least one of each of the listed functions.

B. To create a design on Desmos related to "zero hunger" using the specified functions, you can follow these steps:

1. Start by creating a set of points that form the outline of a plate or a food-related shape using a polynomial function of an even degree (greater than 2).

For example, you can use a quadratic function like y = ax^2 + bx + c to shape the plate.

Certainly! Here's an example design on Desmos related to the topic "zero hunger" using the given functions:

Polynomial function of even degree (greater than 2):

[tex]\(f(x) = x^4 - 2x^2 + 3\)[/tex]

Polynomial function of odd degree (greater than 1):

[tex]\(f(x) = x^3 - 4x\)[/tex]

Exponential function:

[tex]\(h(x) = e^{0.5x}\)[/tex]

Logarithmic function:

[tex]\(j(x) = \ln(x + 1)\)[/tex]

Trigonometric function:

[tex]\(k(x) = \sin(2x) + 1\)[/tex]

Rational function:

[tex]\(m(x) = \frac{x^2 + 2}{x - 1}\)[/tex]

Sum/difference/product/quotient of two functions:

[tex]\(n(x) = f(x) + g(x)\)[/tex]

These equations represent various functions related to zero hunger. You can plug these equations into Desmos and adjust the parameters as needed to create a design that visually represents the topic.

Learn more about Desmos:

brainly.com/question/32377626

#SPJ11

The probability of no tails is 20% which is option A.

in order to  calculate the probability of no tails in the question, al we have to do is  to add   the frequency of the outcome given which are the  "Heads, Heads" that is  two heads in a row:

Probability(No Tails) = Frequency of head, Head divide by / Total frequency

The Total frequency is 40 + 75 + 50 + 35 = 200

Therefore, we can say that P(No Tails) = 40/200 = 0.2 or 20%

Learn more about probability below.

brainly.com/question/23497705

The complete question is:

An experiment is conducted with a coin. The results of the coin being flipped twice 200 times is shown in the table. Outcome Frequency Heads, Heads 40 Heads, Tails 75 Tails, Tails 50 Tails, Heads 35 What is the P(No Tails)?

Outcome Frequency

Heads, Heads 40

Heads, Tails 75

Tails, Tails 50

Tails, Heads 35

What is the P(No Tails)?

A. 20%

B. 25%

C. 50%

D. 85%

The given sequence is monotone and is bounded below but is not bounded above. Therefore, the terms of the sequence are all strictly greater than zero but may continue to increase indefinitely.

For the sequence (a), the definition is given by: a1 = 1 and a+1 = 1 + an (n ≥ 1).

Therefore,a₂ = 1 + a₁= 1 + 1 = 2

a₃ = 1 + a₂ = 1 + 2 = 3

a₄ = 1 + a₃ = 1 + 3 = 4

a₅ = 1 + a₄ = 1 + 4 = 5 ...

The given sequence is called a recursive sequence since each term is described in terms of one or more previous terms.

For the given sequence (a),

each term of the sequence can be represented as:

a₁ < a₂ < a₃ < a₄ < ... < an

Therefore, the sequence (a) is monotone.

(b)The given sequence is given by: a₁ = 1 and a+1 = 1 + an (n ≥ 1).

Thus, a₂ = 1 + a₁ = 1 + 1 = 2

a₃ = 1 + a₂ = 1 + 2 = 3

a₄ = 1 + a₃ = 1 + 3 = 4...

From this, we observe that the sequence is strictly increasing and hence it is bounded from below. However, the sequence is not bounded from above, hence (2) is not bounded

This means that the terms of the sequence are all strictly greater than zero but may continue to increase indefinitely.

This can be shown graphically by plotting the terms of the sequence against the number of terms as shown below:

Graphical representation of sequence(a)The graph shows that the sequence is monotone since the terms of the sequence continue to increase but the sequence is not bounded from above as the terms of the sequence continue to increase indefinitely.

The given sequence (a) is monotone and (2) is bounded below but is not bounded above. Therefore, the terms of the sequence are all strictly greater than zero but may continue to increase indefinitely.

To know more about strictly increasing visit:

brainly.com/question/30098941

#SPJ11

The relative extrema of the function f(x) = x3 - 6x2 - 5 have x-values of 0 and 4, respectively. The relative extrema's equivalent values are -5 and -37, respectively.

To determine the x-values of the relative extrema of the function f(x) = x^3 - 6x^2 - 5, we need to find the critical points where the derivative of the function is equal to zero or does not exist. These critical points correspond to the relative extrema.

1. First, let's find the derivative of the function f(x):
  f'(x) = 3x^2 - 12x

2. Now, we set f'(x) equal to zero and solve for x:
  3x^2 - 12x = 0

3. Factoring out the common factor of 3x, we have:
  3x(x - 4) = 0

4. Applying the zero product property, we set each factor equal to zero:
  3x = 0    or    x - 4 = 0

5. Solving for x, we find two critical points:
  x = 0    or    x = 4

6. Now that we have the critical points, we can determine the values of the relative extrema by plugging these x-values back into the original function f(x).

  When x = 0:
  f(0) = (0)^3 - 6(0)^2 - 5
       = 0 - 0 - 5
       = -5

  When x = 4:
  f(4) = (4)^3 - 6(4)^2 - 5
       = 64 - 6(16) - 5
       = 64 - 96 - 5
       = -37

Therefore, the x-values of the relative extrema of the function f(x) = x^3 - 6x^2 - 5 are x = 0 and x = 4. The corresponding values of the relative extrema are -5 and -37 respectively.

To know more about "Relative Extrema":

https://brainly.com/question/1699599

#SPJ11

The correct option is:

c. y¹ = 3 + √(x - 7)

To find the inverse function of y = (x - 3)^2 + 7 for x > 3, we can follow these steps:

Step 1: Replace y with x and x with y in the given equation:

x = (y - 3)^2 + 7

Step 2: Solve the equation for y:

x - 7 = (y - 3)^2

√(x - 7) = y - 3

y - 3 = √(x - 7)

Step 3: Solve for y by adding 3 to both sides:

y = √(x - 7) + 3

So, the inverse function of y = (x - 3)^2 + 7 for x > 3 is y¹ = √(x - 7) + 3.

Therefore, the correct option is:

c. y¹ = 3 + √(x - 7)

Learn more about inverse function here

https://brainly.com/question/29141206

#SPJ11

The original equation has no real solutions. Therefore, the answer is "NO SOLUTION."

The given equation is a quadratic equation in the form of ax^2 + bx + c = 0, where a = -1/7, b = -6/7, and c = 1. To find the possible real solutions, we can use the quadratic formula. By substituting the given values into the quadratic formula, we can determine the solutions. After simplification, we obtain the solutions. In this case, the equation has two real solutions. To check the validity of the solutions, we can substitute them back into the original equation and verify if both sides are equal.

The quadratic formula states that for an equation of the form ax^2 + bx + c = 0, the solutions can be found using the formula x = (-b ± √(b^2 - 4ac)) / 2a.

By substituting the given values into the quadratic formula, we have:

x = (-(-6/7) ± √((-6/7)^2 - 4(-1/7)(1))) / (2(-1/7))

x = (6/7 ± √((36/49) + (4/7))) / (-2/7)

x = (6/7 ± √(36/49 + 28/49)) / (-2/7)

x = (6/7 ± √(64/49)) / (-2/7)

x = (6/7 ± 8/7) / (-2/7)

x = (14/7 ± 8/7) / (-2/7)

x = (22/7) / (-2/7) or (-6/7) / (-2/7)

x = -11 or 3/2

Thus, the possible real solutions to the equation − (1/7)x^2 − (6/7)x + 1 = 0 are x = -11 and x = 3/2.

To verify the solutions, we can substitute them back into the original equation:

For x = -11:

− (1/7)(-11)^2 − (6/7)(-11) + 1 = 0

121/7 + 66/7 + 1 = 0

(121 + 66 + 7)/7 = 0

194/7 ≠ 0

For x = 3/2:

− (1/7)(3/2)^2 − (6/7)(3/2) + 1 = 0

-9/28 - 9/2 + 1 = 0

(-9 - 126 + 28)/28 = 0

-107/28 ≠ 0

Both substitutions do not yield a valid solution, which means that the original equation has no real solutions. Therefore, the answer is "NO SOLUTION."

Learn more about Real Solution here:

brainly.com/question/33649707

#SPJ11

If a cyclist travels from city A to city B at a constant speed of 12 km/h and takes 2 hours, it would take 3 hours to complete the same trip at a speed of 8 km/h.

To determine the time it would take to make the same trip at 8 km/h, we can use the concept of speed and distance. The relationship between speed, distance, and time is given by the formula:

Time = Distance / Speed

In the given scenario, the cyclist travels from city A to city B at a constant speed of 12 km/h and takes 2 hours to complete the journey. This means the distance between city A and city B can be calculated by multiplying the speed (12 km/h) by the time (2 hours):

Distance = Speed * Time = 12 km/h * 2 hours = 24 km

Now, let's calculate the time it would take to make the same trip at 8 km/h. We can rearrange the formula to solve for time:

Time = Distance / Speed

Substituting the values, we have:

Time = 24 km / 8 km/h = 3 hours

Therefore, it would take 3 hours to make the same trip from city A to city B at a speed of 8 km/h.

For more such question on travels. visit :

https://brainly.com/question/31546710

#SPJ8

Note the translated question is A cyclist who goes at a constant speed of 12 km/h takes 2 hours to travel from city A to city B, how many hours would it take to make the same trip at 8 km/h?