For the figure​ shown, find m1.

The answer is −63,868. To get this just put it into a calculator.

Using the formula of volume of cone and volume of cylinder, the cone will fill the cylinder 3 times.

To determine the amount of water in glass B that will equal the amount of water in glass A, we have to use the formula of volume of cylinder and volume of a cone.

The formula of volume of a cylinder is given as;

V(cylinder) = πr²h

The formula of volume of a cone is given as;

V(cone) = 1/3 πr²h

Substituting the values into the formula of volume of cylinder;

V(cylinder) = 3.14 * 2² * 5

V(cylinder) = 62.8 in³

The volume of the cone is calculated as;

V(cone) = 1/3πr²h

V(cone) = 1/3 * 3.14 * 2² * 5

V(cone) = 20.93 in³

To determine the number of times, we can divide the volume of cylinder by volume of cone.

Number of times = 62.8 / 20.93

Number of times = 3.0

Learn more on volume of cone here;

https://brainly.com/question/12004994

#SPJ1

If the severity of Type I error is high, meaning that it would be very costly or harmful to falsely reject the null hypothesis, then a more stringent alpha level would be appropriate. In this case, option b, 0.001, would be the most appropriate significance level as it would minimize the chance of a Type I error occurring.

An appropriate significance level (alpha level) for a hypothesis test where the severity of Type I error is high would be a lower alpha value. This is because a lower alpha level reduces the likelihood of committing a Type I error (incorrectly rejecting the null hypothesis).

In this case, the appropriate significance level among the given options is:

b) 0.001

A lower alpha level like 0.001 indicates that there is a smaller chance of committing a Type I error, making it more suitable when the severity of Type I error is high.

Learn more about alpha level here: brainly.com/question/15604738

#SPJ11

Answer:

4 (g cm³)

Step-by-step explanation:

Volume of a rectangular block (prism) = length X width X height

we have 2 X 3 X 25 = 150 cm³

Formula for density is

density = mass/volume

            = 600/150

            = 4 (g cm³)

The formula for f(x) is f(x) = -10x^4 + 3x^2 + 4.

How can we find the derivative of both sides of the equation?

We can find the derivative of both sides of the equation using the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus:

d/dx [−2x^5 + x^3 + 4x] = d/dx [∫_0^x f(t) dt]

-10x^4 + 3x^2 + 4 = f(x)

Therefore, the formula for f(x) is:

f(x) = -10x^4 + 3x^2 + 4

We can check that this formula satisfies the original equation by taking the definite integral:

∫_0^x f(t) dt = ∫_0^x (-10t^4 + 3t^2 + 4) dt = [-2t^5 + t^3 + 4t]_0^x = -2x^5 + x^3 + 4x

Thus, the formula for f(x) is f(x) = -10x^4 + 3x^2 + 4.

Learn more about Fundamental Theorem of Calculus

brainly.com/question/31801938

#SPJ11

The area of the surface is 8π.

Given, r(s, t) = (t sinh(s), t cosh(s), t)

Taking partial derivative with respect to s

[tex]\frac{\hat{a}r}{\hat{a}s}[/tex] = (t cosh(s), t sinh(s), 0)

Taking partial derivative with respect to t

[tex]\frac{\hat{a}r}{\hat{a}t}[/tex] = ( sinh(s), cosh(s), 1)

The cross product of these partial derivatives is given by

[tex]|\frac{\hat{a}r}{\hat{a}s} \times\frac{\hat{a}r}{\hat{a}t} |[/tex] = | (t sinh(s), t cosh(s), t)|

= t √(sinh²(s) + cosh²(s) + 1)

= t √(cosh²(s) - 1 + 1)

= t cosh(s)

So, the area of the surface is given by the integral:

A = ∫∫[tex]|\frac{\hat{a}r}{\hat{a}s} \times\frac{\hat{a}r}{\hat{a}t} |[/tex] ds dt

= 2 Ï [tex]\hat{a_0}^{\hat{a} tcosh(s)ds}[/tex]

(Integrating over s)

= 2 Ï [tex]\hat{a_0}^{\hat{a} t(\frac{e^s+e^{-s}}{2} ) ds}[/tex]

=  2 Ï [tex]\hat{a_0}^{\hat{a} \frac{t}{2} (e^s+e^{-s}) ds}[/tex]

= 2 Ï [tex][\frac{t}{2}e^s]_0^\hat{a}[/tex]

= 2π (∞ - 0)

= 8π

Therefore, the area of the surface is 8π.

Learn more about partial derivative here:

brainly.com/question/28751547

#SPJ4

Answer:

Sin(C) = [tex]\frac{3}{5}[/tex].

Cos(B) = [tex]\frac{3}{5}[/tex]

Sin(C) and Cos(B) = [tex]\frac{3}{5}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve this we need to remember the trigonometry ratios. Sin is the side opposite the angle over the hypotenuse.  Cos is the side touching the angle divided by the hypotenuse and Tan is the side opposite the angle divided by the side touching the angle.

Knowing this can help us solve our problem.

Let us first solve for sin C. To solve for this let us look for the side opposite (or directly across) of angle c. This side is side AB or 39. The next thing we need to look for is the hypotenuse. The hypotenuse is the side directly across the right angle. This side is side CB or 65.

Dividing these gives us our first fraction [tex]\frac{39}{65}[/tex]. Now we need to simplify this. 39/65 implied is [tex]\frac{3}{5}[/tex]. This is sin of C.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To solve for cos of B we have to look for the side directly next to the angle. This is side AB or 39. The next step is to identify the hypotenuse. The hypotenuse is 65, so Cos of b is [tex]\frac{39}{65}[/tex] or [tex]\frac{3}{5}[/tex].

Answer: the three constraints on the variables x and y are:

80x + 120y ≤ 4800

x + y ≤ 50

x ≥ 0, y ≥ 0

Step-by-step explanation:

Cost Constraint: The importer wants to spend a maximum of $4800, so the cost of the purchased helmets should not exceed $4800. The cost of x standard helmets and y deluxe helmets can be calculated as 80x + 120y, so the constraint can be written as:

80x + 120y ≤ 4800

Quantity Constraint: The importer cannot import more than 50 helmets in total. Therefore, the sum of standard and deluxe helmets purchased cannot exceed 50. The constraint can be written as:

x + y ≤ 50

Non-negativity Constraint: The importer cannot purchase negative helmets, so the variables x and y should be non-negative. The constraint can be written as:

x ≥ 0, y ≥ 0

Thus, the three constraints on the variables x and y are:

80x + 120y ≤ 4800

x + y ≤ 50

x ≥ 0, y ≥ 0

a) The estimated slope in Model 1 (0.238) means that, on average, for each additional foot between the two objects, the subjects' perceived distance increased by 0.238 feet.

b) The researcher might prefer Model 2 because it has a simpler equation with fewer parameters, which makes it easier to interpret and apply. Additionally, the estimated slope in Model 2 (1.102) is closer to the researcher's hypothesis that subjects would generally overestimate the distance between the objects in the room and that this overestimation would increase the farther apart the objects were.

c) To test the researcher's hypothesis using Model 2, we can set up the null hypothesis as H0: β1=0 (there is no relationship between actual distance and perceived distance) and the alternative hypothesis as Ha: β1>0 (perceived distance increases as actual distance increases). Using a t-test with 38 degrees of freedom (since we estimated one parameter in the model), we find a t-value of 2.803 and a p-value of 0.008, which is less than the significance level of 0.05. Therefore, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is evidence to support the researcher's hypothesis that in dim light, participants overestimate the distance, with the overestimate increasing as the actual distance increases.

d) Without information about the range of values for x and y, it's difficult to provide a precise sketch of the estimated regression models for contact wearers and noncontact wearers. However, we can say that the estimated regression line for contact wearers would have an intercept of 1.05 and a slope of x (0.238 for every non-contact wearer and 0.358 for every contact wearer), while the estimated regression line for noncontact wearers would have an intercept of 0.12 and a slope of x (0.238 for every non-contact wearer and 0.358 less for every contact wearer).

Learn more about :

null hypothesis : brainly.com/question/31525353

#SPJ11

If money is invested at 6% compounded daily, the interest rate per day is 6%/365 = 0.01644%.

To find the number of days it takes to quadruple the money, we can use the formula A = P(1 + r/n)^(nt), where A is the final amount, P is the initial amount, r is the annual interest rate, n is the number of times compounded per year, and t is the time in years. In this case, we want A/P = 4, so we have:

4 = (1 + 0.0001644/1)^(1t)

ln(4) = tln(1 + 0.0001644/1)

t = ln(4)/ln(1 + 0.0001644/1) ≈ 123.73 days

Therefore, it will take about 123.73 days or approximately 4 months to quadruple the money at 6% compounded daily.

If money is invested at 6.9% compounded continuously, we can use the formula A = Pe^(rt) to find the time it takes to quadruple the money. Again, we want A/P = 4, so we have:

4 = e^(0.069t)

ln(4) = 0.069t

t = ln(4)/0.069 ≈ 10.04 years

Therefore, it will take about 10.04 years to quadruple the money at 6.9% compounded continuously.

To learn more about compound interest click here:

brainly.com/question/31880585

#SPJ11

The value of K is: K = 6%.

Here, we have,

To calculate the value of K,

we can set up an equation based on the information given.

For Jeff's perpetuity-immediate, the annual payment is $30.

For Jason's 10-year annuity immediate, the first payment is $53, and each subsequent payment is K% larger than the previous year's payment.

so, we get,

PV = 30/K

now, we get,

Let's denote the common ratio for Jason's annuity as r.

Therefore, the second payment would be (1 + r) times the first payment, the third payment would be (1 + r) times the second payment, and so on.

We can set up the equation:

53 + 53(1 + r) + 53(1 + r)(1 + r) + ... + 53(1 + r)⁹ = 30 + 30 + 30 + ...

To simplify the equation, we can use the formula for the sum of a geometric series:

Sum = a(1 - rⁿ) / (1 - r)

Here, a is the first term (53), r is the common ratio (1 + K/100), and n is the number of terms (10).

Using this formula, the equation becomes:

53(1 - (1 + r)¹⁰) / (1 - (1 + r)) = 30(1 - r) / (1 - 1)

again, we have,

final payment = 53(1+K%)⁹

so, total payment = 53 [(1+K%)⁹-1}/(1+K%)

so, PV = 53*10*1/(1+K)

so we have,

53*10*1/(1+K) = 30/K

=> 53 = 3 + 3K

=> K = 3/50

=> K = 6%

Learn more about payment  here:

brainly.com/question/32320091

#SPJ12

The correlation between the two variables of interest is 0.81, which is significant at the 0.0337 level. This means that there is a strong positive relationship between the variables, and the likelihood of obtaining a correlation of 0.81 or higher due to chance alone is less than 3.37%.

The correlation coefficient measures the strength and direction of the linear relationship between two variables. In this case, the correlation coefficient of 0.81 indicates a strong positive relationship between the variables. The significance level of 0.0337 suggests that the observed correlation is unlikely to occur by chance alone.

It implies that there is evidence to support the conclusion that the correlation is statistically significant and not just a result of random variation. Therefore, the correlation of 0.81 is considered meaningful and reliable in representing the relationship between the variables.


To learn more about correlation click here: brainly.com/question/30116167

#SPJ11

I understand you want to find an angle in a triangle using given information. In this case, you have angle A, side a (opposite angle A), and side b. To solve this, you can use the Law of Sines:
sin(A) / a = sin(B) / b
Given that angle A and sides a and b are known, you can solve for angle B using the following steps:
Step 1: Rearrange the equation to isolate sin(B):
sin(B) = (b * sin(A)) / a
Step 2: Substitute the given values of angle A, side a, and side b into the equation:
sin(B) = (b * sin(A)) / a
Step 3: Calculate the value of sin(B) using the values from Step 2.
Step 4: Find angle B by taking the inverse sine (arcsin) of the value calculated in Step 3:
B = arcsin(sin(B))
Now, you have found angle B using the given information. Remember that the sum of angles in a triangle is 180 degrees, so you can find the third angle, C, by subtracting angles A and B from 180:
C = 180 - A - B
You have now found all angles in the triangle using the given information and the Law of Sines.

To know more about angle visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28451077

#SPJ11

The researcher can reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the pain medication reduces pain on average in less than 21 minutes after taking the dosage, based on the sample data and a 10% significance level.

To test the claim that a pain medication reduces pain on average in less than 21 minutes, the researcher can perform a one-sample t-test with the following null and alternative hypotheses:

Null hypothesis: The true meantime for the medication to take effect is 21 minutes or more (μ ≥ 21).

Alternative hypothesis: The true meantime for the medication to take effect is less than 21 minutes (μ < 21).

The significance level is 10%, which means that the researcher will reject the null hypothesis if the p-value is less than 0.10.

Using the sample data, the researcher calculates the test statistic as follows:

[tex]t = \frac{\bar{x} - \mu}{\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}}$[/tex]

Plugging in the values, we get:

[tex]t = \frac{20.1 - 21}{\frac{3.7}{\sqrt{30}}} = -1.831[/tex]

The degree of freedom for this test is 29 (n - 1). Using a t-table or a t-distribution calculator with 29 degrees of freedom, the researcher finds that the p-value is 0.0409.

Since the p-value is less than the significance level of 0.10, the researcher rejects the null hypothesis. This means that there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the pain medication reduces pain on average in less than 21 minutes after taking the dosage.

In other words, the sample provides evidence that the true population means the time for the medication to take effect is less than 21 minutes. The p-value of 0.0409 indicates that the probability of observing a sample mean of 20.1 minutes or less under the null hypothesis (μ ≥ 21) is less than 4.09%.

To learn more about null hypothesis

https://brainly.com/question/28920252

#SPJ4

In general, economists are critical of monopoly when there is a lack of competition in the market. Hence, option 1) is correct.

This includes situations where there are only a few firms operating in the market, as well as situations where there is a natural monopoly, which occurs when the most efficient market structure involves only one firm due to high fixed costs. However, even in cases of persistent economies of scale where it may seem like a monopoly is necessary for efficiency, economists still tend to be critical as monopolies can lead to higher prices, lower quality products, and reduced innovation.

A monopoly in economics is a scenario when one business or entity has complete control over the production and distribution of a specific good or service. Due to the monopolist's ability to set prices above what the market would otherwise bear, there would be less consumer surplus and associated inefficiencies. Monopolies can develop as a result of entry-level restrictions, such as expensive beginning fees or legal requirements, or through acquiring rival businesses. Monopolies may be regulated or dismantled by governments in an effort to boost competition and safeguard the interests of consumers. Monopolies are a fundamental idea in industrial organisation and have significant effects on the composition and operation of markets.

Learn more about monopoly here:

https://brainly.com/question/15188005

#SPJ11

Answer:

Angle PRQ = 28 degrees.

Step-by-step explanation:

Angles P and Q are the same! That's bc this is an isosceles triangle.

The total of all 3 angles = 180. So to find R, subtract the other 2 angles from 180.

So 180-76-76 = 28. That's angle R

The transformation can be represented as:

\begin{bmatrix} x' \ y' \ w' \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 & 7 \ 0 & 1 & 4 \ 0 & 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} x \ y \ 1 \end{bmatrix}

where (x', y') is the transformed point, and w' is the homogeneous coordinate (usually taken as 1 for 2D transformations).

In matrix form, the transformation can be written as:

\begin{bmatrix} x' \ y' \ 1 \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 & 7 \ 0 & 1 & 4 \ 0 & 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} x \ y \ 1 \end{bmatrix}

So the 3x3 matrix that produces the described transformation is:

\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 & 7 \ 0 & 1 & 4 \ 0 & 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}

Learn more about Matrices here -:  brainly.com/question/29335391

#SPJ11

From the parallelogram WXYZ, the angle of mWZX will be 68° and angle of XR = XZ = 8x - 18.

Using the properties of parallelograms and the given information, we can solve the parallelogram WXYZ

6. Given:

mXYZ = 68°

mWXZ = 71°

mWZX = ?

In a parallelogram, opposite angles are congruent.

Therefore, mWZX will also be 68°.

7. Given:

XZ = 8x - 18

RZ = 2x + 5,

XR = ?

In a parallelogram, opposite sides are congruent.

That is, XR = XZ

Recall that

XZ = 8x - 18

Substitute XZ with its value:

XR = XZ = 8x - 18

Learn more about parallelogram here:

https://brainly.com/question/970600

#SPJ1

Answer: 4 &lt; 5x – 1 &lt; 10  4 &lt; 5x – 3 &lt; 10  4 &lt; 2x + 1 &lt; 10  4 &lt; 2x + 3 &lt; 10

[tex]{ \pmb{ \hookrightarrow}} \: \underline{\boxed{\pmb{\sf{Area_{(Circle)} \: = \: \pi \: {r}^{2} }}}} \: \pmb{\red{\bigstar}} \\ [/tex]

_________________________________________________

[tex]\longrightarrow \sf \: Area_{(Circle)} \: = \: \pi \: {r}^{2} [/tex]

[tex]\longrightarrow \sf \: Area_{(Circle)} \: = \: \frac{22} {7} \: \times {8}^{2} \\ [/tex]

[tex]\longrightarrow \sf \: Area_{(Circle)} \: = \: \frac{22} {7} \: \times 8 \times 8 \\ [/tex]

[tex]\longrightarrow \sf \: Area_{(Circle)} \: = \: \frac{22} {7} \: \times 64 \\ [/tex]

[tex]\longrightarrow \sf \: Area_{(Circle)} \: = \: \frac{1408} {7} \: \: {yard}^{2} \: \\ [/tex]

_________________________________________________

→ Radius = 18/2 = 9 inch

[tex]\longrightarrow \sf \: Area_{(Circle)} \: = \: \pi \: {r}^{2} [/tex]

[tex]\longrightarrow \sf \: Area_{(Circle)} \: = \: \frac{22} {7} \: \times {9}^{2} \\ [/tex]

[tex]\longrightarrow \sf \: Area_{(Circle)} \: = \: \frac{22} {7} \: \times 9 \times 9 \\ [/tex]

[tex]\longrightarrow \sf \: Area_{(Circle)} \: = \: \frac{22} {7} \: \times 81 \\ [/tex]

[tex]\longrightarrow \sf \: Area_{(Circle)} \: = \: \frac{1782} {7} \: \: {inch}^{2} \: \\ [/tex]

_________________________________________________

[tex]\longrightarrow \sf \: Area_{(Circle)} \: = \: \pi \: {r}^{2} [/tex]

[tex]\longrightarrow \sf \: Area_{(Circle)} \: = \: \frac{22} {7} \: \times {10}^{2} \\ [/tex]

[tex]\longrightarrow \sf \: Area_{(Circle)} \: = \: \frac{22} {7} \: \times 10 \times 10 \\ [/tex]

[tex]\longrightarrow \sf \: Area_{(Circle)} \: = \: \frac{22} {7} \: \times 100 \\ [/tex]

[tex]\longrightarrow \sf \: Area_{(Circle)} \: = \: \frac{2200} {7} \: \: {yard}^{2} \: \\ [/tex]

_________________________________________________

[tex]\longrightarrow \sf \: Area_{(Circle)} \: = \: \pi \: {r}^{2} [/tex]

[tex]\longrightarrow \sf \: Area_{(Circle)} \: = \: \frac{22} {7} \: \times {6}^{2} \\ [/tex]

[tex]\longrightarrow \sf \: Area_{(Circle)} \: = \: \frac{22} {7} \: \times 6 \times 6 \\ [/tex]

[tex]\longrightarrow \sf \: Area_{(Circle)} \: = \: \frac{22} {7} \: \times 36 \\ [/tex]

[tex]\longrightarrow \sf \: Area_{(Circle)} \: = \: \frac{792} {7} \: \: {inch}^{2} \: \\ [/tex]

_________________________________________________

[tex]\longrightarrow \sf \: Area_{(Circle)} \: = \: \pi \: {r}^{2} [/tex]

[tex]\longrightarrow \sf \: Area_{(Circle)} \: = \: \frac{22} {7} \: \times {4}^{2} \\ [/tex]

[tex]\longrightarrow \sf \: Area_{(Circle)} \: = \: \frac{22} {7} \: \times 4 \times 4 \\ [/tex]

[tex]\longrightarrow \sf \: Area_{(Circle)} \: = \: \frac{22} {7} \: \times 16 \\ [/tex]

[tex]\longrightarrow \sf \: Area_{(Circle)} \: = \: \frac{352} {7} \: \: {ft}^{2} \: \\ [/tex]

_________________________________________________

→ Radius = 10/2 = 5 ft

[tex]\longrightarrow \sf \: Area_{(Circle)} \: = \: \pi \: {r}^{2} [/tex]

[tex]\longrightarrow \sf \: Area_{(Circle)} \: = \: \frac{22} {7} \: \times {5}^{2} \\ [/tex]

[tex]\longrightarrow \sf \: Area_{(Circle)} \: = \: \frac{22} {7} \: \times 5 \times 5 \\ [/tex]

[tex]\longrightarrow \sf \: Area_{(Circle)} \: = \: \frac{22} {7} \: \times 25 \\ [/tex]

[tex]\longrightarrow \sf \: Area_{(Circle)} \: = \: \frac{550} {7} \: \: {ft}^{2} \: \\ [/tex]

_________________________________________________

[tex]\longrightarrow \sf \: Area_{(Circle)} \: = \: \pi \: {r}^{2} [/tex]

[tex]\longrightarrow \sf \: Area_{(Circle)} \: = \: \frac{22} {7} \: \times {1}^{2} \\ [/tex]

[tex]\longrightarrow \sf \: Area_{(Circle)} \: = \: \frac{22} {7} \: \times 1 \times 1 \\ [/tex]

[tex]\longrightarrow \sf \: Area_{(Circle)} \: = \: \frac{22} {7} \: \times 1 \\ [/tex]

[tex]\longrightarrow \sf \: Area_{(Circle)} \: = \: \frac{22} {7} \: \: {yard}^{2} \: \\ [/tex]

_________________________________________________

→ Radius = 14/2 = 7 inch

[tex]\longrightarrow \sf \: Area_{(Circle)} \: = \: \pi \: {r}^{2} [/tex]

[tex]\longrightarrow \sf \: Area_{(Circle)} \: = \: \frac{22} {7} \: \times {7}^{2} \\ [/tex]

[tex]\longrightarrow \sf \: Area_{(Circle)} \: = \: \frac{22} {7} \: \times 7 \times 7 \\ [/tex]

[tex]\longrightarrow \sf \: Area_{(Circle)} \: = \: \frac{22} {7} \: \times 49 \\ [/tex]

[tex]\longrightarrow \sf \: Area_{(Circle)} \: = \: \frac{1078} {7} \: \: \: \\ [/tex]

[tex]\longrightarrow \sf \: Area_{(Circle)} \: = \: 154 \: \: {inch}^{2} \: \\ [/tex]

_________________________________________________

[tex]\longrightarrow \sf \: Area_{(Circle)} \: = \: \pi \: {r}^{2} [/tex]

[tex]\longrightarrow \sf \: Area_{(Circle)} \: = \: \frac{22} {7} \: \times {2}^{2} \\ [/tex]

[tex]\longrightarrow \sf \: Area_{(Circle)} \: = \: \frac{22} {7} \: \times 2 \times 2 \\ [/tex]

[tex]\longrightarrow \sf \: Area_{(Circle)} \: = \: \frac{22} {7} \: \times 4 \\ [/tex]

[tex]\longrightarrow \sf \: Area_{(Circle)} \: = \: \frac{88} {7} \: \: {yard}^{2} \: \\ [/tex]

_________________________________________________

The eigenvalues of a are 2, 2, 5, then a is invertible matrix .

The eigenvalues are 2, 2, 5.

(A) First check the matrix is certainly invertible.

The matrix is invertible when the product of eigenvalues does not equal to zero.

invertible of A = 2*2*5

invertible of A = 20 ≠ zero.

So the matrix is certainly invertible.

(B) Now we check the matrix is certainly diagonalizable.

We note that the eigen value 2 has an algebraic multiplicity of 2 (number of repetitions), but we are unsure if the accompanying eigen vectors likewise have a count of two (geometric multiplicity)

The sum of the algebraic multiplicities must equal the sum of the geometric multiplicities in order for A to be diagonalizable.

In this instance, there is no evidence to support the geometric multiplicity of the eigenvalue 2. Therefore, we are unable to affirm that A is diagonalizable

So A can not be diagonalizable.

(C) Now we check the matrix is certainly not diagonalizable.

If the homogeneous equation from (A-⋋I)x=0 when the eigen value ⋋=2 is substituted x+y+z=0, then the solution set is x=-k-m where y=k, z=m are the parameters.

So it can be written as

[tex]\left[\begin{array}{ccc}x\\y\\z\end{array}\right] = k\left[\begin{array}{ccc}-1\\1\\0\end{array}\right] + m \left[\begin{array}{ccc}-1\\0\\1\end{array}\right][/tex]

Putting k=1 and m=1, then the corresponding eigen vectors for ⋋=2 are  

[tex]\left[\begin{array}{ccc}-1\\1\\0\end{array}\right] , \left[\begin{array}{ccc}-1\\0\\1\end{array}\right][/tex]

So the geometric multiplicity of the eigen value ⋋=2 is 2.

The algebraic multiplicity = Geometric multiplicity we can see the given matrix A is diagonalizable.

So the statement is false.

To know more about invertible matrix click here :

https://brainly.com/question/30754589

#SPJ4

The total cost of repayment over 5 years is $23,300.

A loan repayment refers to the act of paying back money previously borrowed from a lender.

To get total cost of repayment, we must principal amount, the interest rate and the duration of the loan.

The formula to get total cost of repayment is given by [tex]Total Cost of Repayment = Principal + Interest[/tex]

Interest = Principal * Interest Rate * Time

Given:

Principal amount is $20,000

Interest rate is 3.3%

Duration is 5 years.

Interest = $20,000 * 0.033 * 5

Interest = $3,300

Total Cost of Repayment = Principal + Interest

= $20,000 + $3,300

= $23,300.

Read more about repayment

brainly.com/question/25696681

#SPJ1

The probability would be 48%

Given that Teresa will make a free-throw basketball is 50%.

The procedures below can be used to simulate the likelihood that Teresa will convert both of her upcoming free throw attempts:

Configure the simulation's settings: Choose how many trials you'll perform to assess the likelihood. Say you decide to do 1,000 tests.

Initialize variables:

Create two counters, "success count" and "total trials," and name them accordingly. Each counter must begin at 0.

Activate the simulation: Repeat the following actions for the required number of trials (in this case, 1,000) in a loop:

Create a random number between 0 and 1 as option

a. Consider the random number to be a successful free-throw attempt if it is less than or equal to 0.5 (Teresa makes it).

Otherwise, consider Teresa's attempt unsuccessful (she misses).

b. Re-do step "a" for the second attempt at the free throw.

c. Adjust the counters appropriately. Add one to the success count if both shots were successful.

The total trials counter is raised by 1.

Estimate the likelihood and calculate: To determine the expected likelihood of making both free-throw attempts, divide the success count by the total trials.

Let's say, for illustration purposes, that after 1,000 trials of the simulation, Teresa made both shots successfully in 480 of those attempts.

The calculated probability would be 48%, or 480/1000 = 0.48.

Learn more about simulation in probability click;

https://brainly.com/question/16670333

#SPJ1

The angle of the terminal side through the point (0.5, 0.866) is approximately 59.0° to the nearest tenth of a degree.

To find the angle of the terminal side through a given point on the unit circle, we need to determine the angle measure in degrees.

Let's assume the given point on the unit circle is (x, y). The x-coordinate represents the cosine of the angle, and the y-coordinate represents the sine of the angle.

Using the given point, we can find the angle θ using the inverse trigonometric functions. The angle θ is given by:

θ = arctan(y / x)

However, since the unit circle is symmetrical, we need to consider the signs of x and y to determine the correct quadrant of the angle. This will help us find the angle in the range of 0° to 360°.

Here's an example to illustrate the process:

Let's say the given point on the unit circle is (0.5, 0.866). To find the angle θ, we use the inverse tangent (arctan) function:

θ = arctan(0.866 / 0.5)

Using a calculator, we find θ ≈ 59.036°.

Since the point (0.5, 0.866) lies in the first quadrant, the angle is in the range of 0° to 90°.

Therefore, the angle of the terminal side through the point (0.5, 0.866) is approximately 59.0° to the nearest tenth of a degree.

For such more questions on Angle of Terminal Side

https://brainly.com/question/31029994

#SPJ11

To solve the expression (x^2 + 2x - 8)/(x^2 + 3x - 10) * (x + 5)/(x^2 - 16), we can begin by factoring the quadratic expressions in the numerator and denominator of the first fraction:

(x^2 + 2x - 8)/(x^2 + 3x - 10) = ((x + 4)(x - 2))/((x + 5)(x - 2))

Similarly, we can factor the quadratic expression in the denominator of the second fraction:

(x + 5)/(x^2 - 16) = (x + 5)/((x + 4)(x - 4))

Substituting these expressions back into the original expression, we get:

((x + 4)(x - 2))/((x + 5)(x - 2)) * (x + 5)/((x + 4)(x - 4))

We can then cancel out the x - 2 and x + 4 factors in the numerator and denominator:

(x + 5)/(x - 4)

Therefore, the simplified expression is (x + 5)/(x - 4).

The Natural area will be 100 feet wide.

Algebra is a branch of mathematics that deals with equations and variables.

To start, there are some specific requirements for the dimensions of the nature area. The length should be twice the width, which means that if we use "w" to represent the width, the length would be "2w". Additionally, a retaining wall that is "h" feet high will be installed around the perimeter of the space.

The total length of the retaining wall needed is given, which means we can use this information to solve for "w". To do this, we need to use a bit of algebra.

First, let's write out the equation for the total length of the retaining wall:

2(2w) + 2w = 600

6w = 600

Dividing both sides by 6, we get:

w = 100

Therefore, the width of the nature area will be 100 feet.

To know more about Algebra here

https://brainly.com/question/24875240

#SPJ4

Answer:

x=-1

y=-10

x=-2

y=0

Step-by-step explanation:

we pit why into the first formula, wimplifying it and using the quadratic formula to get the two values for x, we then put the two values into x into the value for y

We can use the distance formula to calculate the distance between the center and the point. This distance is equal to the radius of the sphere. the radius of the sphere that passes through the point (-1, 4, 3) and has center (8, 1, 3) is √90 units.

In this problem, the center of the sphere is given as (8, 1, 3) and the point it passes through is (-1, 4, 3). To find the radius, we need to calculate the distance between these two points.      

Using the distance formula, we get:

√[(8 - (-1))^2 + (1 - 4)^2 + (3 - 3)^2] = √(81 + 9) = √90

Therefore, the radius of the sphere is √90 units.

In summary, to find the radius of a sphere that passes through a given point and has a known center, we can use the distance formula to calculate the distance between the center and the point. In this problem, the radius of the sphere that passes through the point (-1, 4, 3) and has center (8, 1, 3) is √90 units.

To know more about distance formula :  brainly.com/question/28956738

#SPJ11

A point on the edge of a 45 rpm record is moving 0.18 ft/sec faster than a point on the edge of a 33 rpm record.

To compare the speeds of the two records, we need to find the linear velocity of a point on the edge of each record. The linear velocity is the distance traveled by a point on the edge of the record in a given time.

For the 45 rpm record, the diameter is 7 inches, which means the radius is 3.5 inches (7/2). The circumference of the record is then 2πr = 2π(3.5) = 22 inches. To convert this to feet, we divide by 12 to get 1.83 feet.

The linear velocity of a point on the edge of the 45 rpm record is then:

V45 = 1.83 ft/circumference x 45 rev/min x 1 min/60 sec = 1.91 ft/sec

For the 33 rpm record, the diameter is 12 inches, which means the radius is 6 inches (12/2). The circumference of the record is then 2πr = 2π(6) = 37.7 inches. To convert this to feet, we divide by 12 to get 3.14 feet.

The linear velocity of a point on the edge of the 33 rpm record is then:

V33 = 3.14 ft/circumference x 33 rev/min x 1 min/60 sec = 1.73 ft/sec

The difference in speeds between the two records is then:

V45 - V33 = 1.91 ft/sec - 1.73 ft/sec = 0.18 ft/sec

Therefore, a point on the edge of a 45 rpm record is moving 0.18 ft/sec faster than a point on the edge of a 33 rpm record.

for such more question on speeds

https://brainly.com/question/23377525

#SPJ11