Therefore, T is not a linear mapping. A5: D: M2x2 (R)→ R defined by D(A) = det A
The mapping D is not linear. One of the properties that a linear mapping should satisfy is the preservation of scalar multiplication. However, in this case, D(A) = det A involves taking the determinant of a matrix, which does not preserve scalar multiplication.
A6: L: P(R)→ P(R) defined by L(a + bx + cx²) = (a - b) + (b + c)x²
The mapping L is linear. It satisfies the properties of linearity, such as preserving scalar multiplication and addition. For example, L(k(a + bx + cx²)) = L(ka + kbx + kcx²) = k(a - b) + k(b + c)x² = kL(a + bx + cx²).
A7: T: R2 → M2x2(R) defined by T(x, e) = [x1 1][1 x2]
The mapping T is not linear. To determine if a mapping is linear, we need to check if it satisfies the properties of linearity, including preserving scalar multiplication and addition. In this case, T(x, e) = [x1 1][1 x2] does not preserve scalar multiplication. For example, T(kx, e) = [kx1 1][1 x2] ≠ kT(x, e).
Therefore, T is not a linear mapping.
Learn more about scalar multiplication here-
https://brainly.com/question/30221358
#SPJ11
An airplane flies over a straight route connecting two radio beams located at 18 miles from each other. Given that the angles of depression [check the textbook, page 485 . for the definitionl are. respectivelv. 25 ∘
. and 34 ∘
. find the altitude. 22mi Hint. The altitude from the plane to the ground does not split the 22 miles distance between the beams in two equal parts. You may call the two pieces x, and y, with x+y=22. Note how they form, with the altitude, two right triangles. The relation between x and y, together with the
Given that the angles of depression from an airplane to two radio beams located 18 miles apart are 25° and 34°, the altitude of the airplane is approximately 6.63 miles.
Let's consider the two right triangles formed by the altitude of the airplane and the line connecting the beams. We can label the two segments of the distance between the beams as x and y, with x + y = 22 miles.
Using the concept of trigonometry, we can determine the relationships between the sides of the triangles and the given angles of depression. In each triangle, the tangent of the angle of depression is equal to the opposite side (altitude) divided by the adjacent side (x or y).
For the first triangle with an angle of depression of 25°, we have:
tan(25°) = altitude / x
Similarly, for the second triangle with an angle of depression of 34°, we have:
tan(34°) = altitude / y
Using the given values, we can rearrange the equations to solve for the altitude:
altitude = x * tan(25°) = y * tan(34°)
Substituting the relationship x + y = 22, we can solve for the altitude:
x * tan(25°) = (22 - x) * tan(34°)
Solving this equation algebraically, we find x ≈ 10.63 miles. Substituting this value into x + y = 22, we get y ≈ 11.37 miles.
Therefore, the altitude of the airplane is approximately 6.63 miles (10.63 miles - 4 miles) based on the difference between the height of the airplane and the height of the radio beams.
To learn more about trigonometry visit:
brainly.com/question/11016599
#SPJ11
Given the following homogeneous second order linear equation: 4d²y/dx² + 3dy/dx² - 10y = 0 a) Write down the Auxiliary Equation. b) Evaluate the Roots of Auxiliary Equation. c) Evaluate the Complementary Function.
The auxiliary equation is 4r² + 3r - 10 = 0. The roots of the auxiliary equation are r₁ = 5/4 and r₂ = -2. The complementary function is y_c = C₁e^(5/4x) + C₂e^(-2x).
a) The auxiliary equation can be obtained by replacing d²y/dx² with r² and dy/dx with r in the equation. Thus, the auxiliary equation is 4r² + 3r - 10 = 0.
b) To find the roots of the auxiliary equation, we can solve the quadratic equation 4r² + 3r - 10 = 0. We can use the quadratic formula: r = (-b ± √(b² - 4ac)) / (2a). Plugging in the values a = 4, b = 3, and c = -10, we get r = (-3 ± √(3² - 4(4)(-10))) / (2(4)). Simplifying further, we have r = (-3 ± √(9 + 160)) / 8, which becomes r = (-3 ± √169) / 8. This gives us two roots: r₁ = (-3 + 13) / 8 = 10 / 8 = 5/4, and r₂ = (-3 - 13) / 8 = -16 / 8 = -2.
c) The complementary function is given by y_c = C₁e^(r₁x) + C₂e^(r₂x), where C₁ and C₂ are constants. Plugging in the values of r₁ and r₂, the complementary function becomes y_c = C₁e^(5/4x) + C₂e^(-2x).
In summary, the auxiliary equation is 4r² + 3r - 10 = 0. The roots of the auxiliary equation are r₁ = 5/4 and r₂ = -2. The complementary function is y_c = C₁e^(5/4x) + C₂e^(-2x).
Learn more about quadratic formula here:
https://brainly.com/question/22364785
#SPJ11
Find all EXACT solutions of the equation given below in the interval \( [0,2 \pi) \). \[ \tan (x)=-\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}} \] Note: If there is more than one answer, enter them in a list separated by comma
The equation [tex]\(\tan(x) = -\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}\)[/tex] has two exact solutions in the interval [tex]\([0, 2\pi)\).[/tex] The solutions are [tex]\(x = \frac{5\pi}{6}\)[/tex] and [tex]\(x = \frac{11\pi}{6}\).[/tex]
To find the solutions to the equation [tex]\(\tan(x) = -\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}\)[/tex], we need to determine the values of (x) in the interval [tex]\([0, 2\pi)\)[/tex] that satisfies the equation.
The tangent function is negative in the second and fourth quadrants. We can find the reference angle by taking the inverse tangent of the absolute value of the given value [tex]\(\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}\)[/tex]. The inverse tangent of [tex]\(\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}\) is \(\frac{\pi}{6}\).[/tex]
In the second quadrant, the angle with a tangent of [tex]\(-\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}\) is \(\frac{\pi}{6} + \pi = \frac{7\pi}{6}\).[/tex]
In the fourth quadrant, the angle with a tangent of [tex]\(-\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}\) is \(\frac{\pi}{6} + 2\pi = \frac{13\pi}{6}\).[/tex]
However, we need to consider the interval [tex]\([0, 2\pi)\).[/tex] The angles [tex]\(\frac{7\pi}{6}\) and \(\frac{13\pi}{6}\)[/tex]are not within this interval. So, we need to find coterminal angles that fall within the interval.
Adding or subtracting multiples of [tex]\(2\pi\)[/tex] the angles, we have [tex]\(\frac{7\pi}{6} + 2\pi = \frac{19\pi}{6}\) and \(\frac{13\pi}{6} + 2\pi = \frac{25\pi}{6}\).[/tex]
Therefore, the exact solutions of the equation[tex]\(\tan(x) = -\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}\) in the interval \([0, 2\pi)\) are \(x = \frac{5\pi}{6}\) and \(x = \frac{11\pi}{6}\).[/tex]
To learn more about exact solutions visit:
brainly.com/question/17119033
#SPJ11
Prednisolone oral suspension 10mg every 8 hours. The child weighs 40l The safe dose range is 0.14−2mg/kg/d ay divided t.i.d ( 3x/ day) or q.i.d (4x/day) a) What is the child's weight in kilograms? b) Is this a safe dose? c) If yes, and the medication is available in 5mg/5ml, how much will the nurs administer per dose?
la) To convert the child's weight from pounds to kilograms, we can use the conversion factor [tex]\displaystyle 1 \text{ lb} = 0.4536 \text{ kg}[/tex].
Weight in kilograms = [tex]\displaystyle 40 \text{ lb} \times 0.4536 \text{ kg/lb} = 18.14 \text{ kg}[/tex]
b) To determine if the given dose is safe, we need to check if it falls within the safe dose range. The safe dose range is given as [tex]\displaystyle 0.14 - 2 \text{ mg/kg/day}[/tex] divided [tex]\displaystyle t.i.d[/tex] (3 times a day) or [tex]\displaystyle q.i.d[/tex] (4 times a day).
Safe dose range for the child = [tex]\displaystyle 0.14 \text{ mg/kg/day} \times 18.14 \text{ kg} - 2 \text{ mg/kg/day} \times 18.14 \text{ kg}[/tex]
Safe dose range for the child = [tex]\displaystyle 2.5376 \text{ mg/day} - 36.28 \text{ mg/day}[/tex]
The prescribed dose of prednisolone oral suspension 10 mg every 8 hours is within the safe dose range of [tex]\displaystyle 2.5376 \text{ mg/day} - 36.28 \text{ mg/day}[/tex] for the child.
c) If the medication is available in a concentration of 5 mg/5 ml, we can calculate the amount the nurse should administer per dose.
The prescribed dose is 10 mg every 8 hours, which means 3 times a day.
Amount of medication per dose = Total prescribed dose per day / Number of doses per day
Amount of medication per dose = [tex]\displaystyle (10 \text{ mg} \times 3) / 3[/tex]
Amount of medication per dose = [tex]\displaystyle 10 \text{ mg}[/tex]
Therefore, the nurse should administer 10 mg of prednisolone oral suspension per dose, which corresponds to 10 ml since the concentration is 5 mg/5 ml.
[tex]\huge{\mathfrak{\colorbox{black}{\textcolor{lime}{I\:hope\:this\:helps\:!\:\:}}}}[/tex]
♥️ [tex]\large{\underline{\textcolor{red}{\mathcal{SUMIT\:\:ROY\:\:(:\:\:}}}}[/tex]
9. On separate coordinate planes, sketch the graphs of the given functions over the interval -2 ≤ x ≤ 2. a) f(x) = sin r b) g(x) = |sin x| c) h(x) = sin |x|
a) We can plot these points and connect them to form a smooth curve. Here's the graph of f(x) = sin x:
b)The graph of g(x) = |sin x|:
The given functions over the interval -2 ≤ x ≤ 2 on separate coordinate planes.
a) f(x) = sin x:
To graph the function f(x) = sin x, we need to plot points on the coordinate plane. Let's calculate the values of sin x for various values of x within the given interval:
When x = -2, sin(-2) ≈ -0.909
When x = -1, sin(-1) ≈ -0.841
When x = 0, sin(0) = 0
When x = 1, sin(1) ≈ 0.841
When x = 2, sin(2) ≈ 0.909
Now, we can plot these points and connect them to form a smooth curve. Here's the graph of f(x) = sin x:
|
1 | .
| .
| .
---------|---------------------
|
-1 | .
| .
| .
---------|---------------------
|
|
0 |---------------------
-2 -1 1 2
b) g(x) = |sin x|:
To graph the function g(x) = |sin x|, we need to calculate the absolute value of sin x for various values of x within the given interval:
When x = -2, |sin(-2)| ≈ 0.909
When x = -1, |sin(-1)| ≈ 0.841
When x = 0, |sin(0)| = 0
When x = 1, |sin(1)| ≈ 0.841
When x = 2, |sin(2)| ≈ 0.909
Now, we can plot these points and connect them to form a smooth curve. Here's the graph of g(x) = |sin x|:
|
1 | .
| .
| .
---------|---------------------
|
-1 | .
| .
|.
---------|---------------------
|
|
0 |---------------------
-2 -1 1 2
c) h(x) = sin |x|:
To graph the function h(x) = sin |x|, we need to calculate the values of sin |x| for various values of x within the given interval:
When x = -2, sin |-2| = sin 2 ≈ 0.909
When x = -1, sin |-1| = sin 1 ≈ 0.841
When x = 0, sin |0| = sin 0 = 0
When x = 1, sin |1| = sin 1 ≈ 0.841
When x = 2, sin |2| = sin 2 ≈ 0.909
Now, we can plot these points and connect them to form a smooth curve. Here's the graph of h(x) = sin |x|:
|
1 | .
| .
| .
---------|---------------------
|
-1 | .
| .
|.
---------|---------------------
|
|
0 |---------------------
-2 -1 1 2
These are the graphs of the functions f(x) = sin x, g(x) = |sin x|, and h(x) = sin |x| over the interval
-2 ≤ x ≤ 2 on separate coordinate planes.
Learn more about graph here:
https://brainly.com/question/32634451
#SPJ11
Anders discovered an old pay statement from 14 years ago. His monthly salary at the time was $3,300 versus his current salary of $6,320 per month At what (equivalent) compound annual rate has his salary grown during the period? (Do not round intermediate calculations and round your final percentage answer to 2 decimal places.) His salary grew at a rate of % compounded annually
The required solution is as follows. The salary grew at a rate of 5.23% compounded annually.
Given that Anders discovered an old pay statement from 14 years ago. His monthly salary at the time was $3,300 versus his current salary of $6,320 per month.
We need to find what equivalent compound annual rate has his salary grown during the period?
We can solve this problem using the compound interest formula which is given by,A = P(1 + r/n)ntWhere, A = final amount, P = principal, r = annual interest rate, t = time in years, and n = number of compounding periods per year.Let us assume that the compound annual rate of his salary growth is "r".
Initial Salary, P = $3300Final Salary, A = $6320Time, t = 14 yearsn = 1 (as it is compounded annually) By substituting the given values in the formula we get,A = P(1 + r/n)nt6320 = 3300(1 + r/1)14r/1 = (6320/3300)^(1/14) - 1r = 5.23%
Therefore, Anders' salary grew at a rate of 5.23% compounded annually during the period.
Hence, the required solution is as follows.The salary grew at a rate of 5.23% compounded annually.
To know more about salary grew visit:
brainly.com/question/28828696
#SPJ11
Find two negative and three positive angles, expressed in radians, for which the point on the unit circle that corresponds to each angle is Choose the correct angles below. CO A. (O B. O C. O D. 14 3
Two negative angles on the unit circle that correspond to points are -π/3 radians and -π radians, while three positive angles are π/6 radians, π/3 radians, and 2π/3 radians.
On the unit circle, an angle is measured in radians. To find negative angles, we move in the clockwise direction, while positive angles are measured in the counterclockwise direction.
Negative angles:
1.-π/3 radians: Starting from the positive x-axis, we move clockwise by π/3 radians, resulting in a point on the unit circle. This angle corresponds to option B.
2.-π radians: Moving further clockwise from the positive x-axis by π radians, we reach the opposite side of the unit circle. This angle corresponds to option C.
Positive angles:
1.π/6 radians: Starting from the positive x-axis, we move counterclockwise by π/6 radians to find a point on the unit circle. This angle corresponds to option A.
2.π/3 radians: Moving further counterclockwise by π/3 radians, we reach another point on the unit circle. This angle corresponds to option D.
3.2π/3 radians: Continuing in the counterclockwise direction, we move by 2π/3 radians to find a third point on the unit circle. This angle corresponds to option E.
The two negative angles are -π/3 radians and -π radians, while the three positive angles are π/6 radians, π/3 radians, and 2π/3 radians.
Learn more about negative angles here:
https://brainly.com/question/29112334
#SPJ11
Solve the equation 4cos20 + 10cos 0 = -4 given that 0≤0 < 2T. Provide your answer below:
The equation 4cos(20°) + 10cos(0°) = -4 is satisfied when 0° ≤ θ < 2π. The equation simplifies to 4cos(20°) + 10 = -4.
To solve the equation, we first evaluate the cosine values. cos(20°) can be calculated using a calculator or trigonometric tables. Let's assume it is equal to a.
The equation then becomes:
4a + 10cos(0°) = -4
4a + 10 = -4
Simplifying the equation, we have:
4a = -14
a = -14/4
a = -7/2
Now we substitute the value of a back into the equation:
4cos(20°) + 10 = -4
4(-7/2) + 10 = -4
-14 + 10 = -4
Therefore, the equation is satisfied when 0° ≤ θ < 2π. The solution to the equation is not a specific angle, but a range of angles that satisfy the equation.
Learn more about cosine here:
https://brainly.com/question/11550090
#SPJ11
A study of fourteen nations revealed that personal gun ownership was high in nations with high homicide rates. The study concluded that gun owners are more likely to commit homicide. The conclusions of this study are an example of: A.Cohort effect B.Causal inference C.Selection bias D.Measurement bias E.Ecologic fallacy
A study of fourteen nations revealed that personal gun ownership was high in nations with high homicide rates. The study concluded that gun owners are more likely to commit homicide. The conclusions of this study are an example of: "Ecologic fallacy" (Option E).
The ecologic fallacy occurs when conclusions about individuals are drawn based on group-level data or associations. In this case, the study observed a correlation between personal gun ownership and high homicide rates at the national level. However, it does not provide direct evidence or establish a causal link between individual gun owners and their likelihood to commit homicide. It is possible that other factors, such as social, economic, or cultural differences among the nations, contribute to both high gun ownership and high homicide rates.
To make a causal inference about gun owners being more likely to commit homicide, individual-level data and a more rigorous study design would be needed to establish a direct relationship between personal gun ownership and individual behavior.
Learn more about rates from
https://brainly.com/question/119866
#SPJ11
What amount invested today would grow to $10,500 after 25 years, if the investment earns: (Do not round intermediate calculations and round your final answers to 2 decimal places.) Amount a. 8% compounded annually $ b. 8% compounded semiannually $ c. 8% compounded quarterly $ d. 8% compounded monthly $
Amount invested today to grow to $10,500 after 25 years is $2,261.68 for monthly compounding, $2,289.03 for quarterly compounding, $2,358.41 for semiannual compounding, and $2,500.00 for annual compounding.
The amount of money that needs to be invested today to grow to a certain amount in the future depends on the following factors:
The interest rateThe number of yearsThe frequency of compoundingIn this case, we are given that the interest rate is 8%, the number of years is 25, and the frequency of compounding can be annual, semiannual, quarterly, or monthly.
We can use the following formula to calculate the amount of money that needs to be invested today: A = P(1 + r/n)^nt
where:
A is the amount of money in the futureP is the amount of money invested todayr is the interest raten is the number of times per year that interest is compoundedt is the number of yearsFor annual compounding, we get:
A = P(1 + 0.08)^25 = $2,500.00
For semiannual compounding, we get:
A = P(1 + 0.08/2)^50 = $2,358.41
For quarterly compounding, we get:
A = P(1 + 0.08/4)^100 = $2,289.03
For monthly compounding, we get:
A = P(1 + 0.08/12)^300 = $2,261.68
As we can see, the amount of money that needs to be invested today increases as the frequency of compounding increases. This is because more interest is earned when interest is compounded more frequently.
To know more about rate click here
brainly.com/question/199664
#SPJ11
Elly invested RM2000 each into two accounts for her daughter. Account A pays 4% compounded quarterly while Account B pays 5% simple interest per annum. Determine the interest obtained in Account A if the investment period is 54 months
The interest obtained in Account A after 54 months is approximately RM393.43.
To calculate the interest obtained in Account A, we need to use the formula for compound interest:
A = P(1 + r/n)^(nt)
Where:
A = the final amount
P = the principal amount (initial investment)
r = annual interest rate (as a decimal)
n = number of times interest is compounded per year
t = time in years
In this case, Elly invested RM2000 into Account A, which pays 4% compounded quarterly. So we have:
P = RM2000
r = 4% = 0.04
n = 4 (compounded quarterly)
t = 54 months = 54/12 = 4.5 years
Plugging these values into the formula, we can calculate the interest obtained in Account A:
A = 2000(1 + 0.04/4)^(4 * 4.5)
Simplifying the equation:
A = 2000(1 + 0.01)^(18)
A = 2000(1.01)^(18)
A ≈ 2000(1.196716)
A ≈ 2393.43
To find the interest obtained in Account A, we subtract the initial investment from the final amount:
Interest = A - P = 2393.43 - 2000 = RM393.43
Therefore, the interest obtained in Account A after 54 months is approximately RM393.43.
To know more about principal amount, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30163719
#SPJ11
A system has the following transfer function. Determine the time to peak, Tp, and the max point, Mp, for this system if it is exposed to a unit step input,
G(s) = 16/s^2+2s +16
(A) Mp = 1.22, Tp, = 0.62 (B) Mp = 1.44, Tp = 0.81 (C) Mp = 2.04, Tp = 1.05 (D) Mp = 2.56, Tp = 1.62
The time to peak, Tp, and the max point, Mp, for this system if it is exposed to a unit step input is: the closest match is (C) Mp = 2.04, Tp = 1.05. the correct option is (C) Mp = 2.04, Tp = 1.05.
Here, we have,
To determine the time to peak (Tp) and the maximum point (Mp) for the system's response to a unit step input, we can analyze the transfer function and apply the standard formulas for these parameters.
The transfer function is given as:
G(s) = 16 / (s² + 2s + 16)
To find Tp, we need to find the time at which the system's response reaches its peak.
For a second-order system with a transfer function in the form of
G(s) = K / (s² + 2ζω_ns + ω_n²), the time to peak can be calculated as
Tp = π / (ω_n√(1 - ζ^2)), where ω_n is the natural frequency and ζ is the damping ratio.
Comparing the given transfer function G(s) = 16 / (s² + 2s + 16) with the general form, we can identify ω_n = 4 and ζ = 0.5.
Substituting these values into the formula, we get:
Tp = π / (4√(1 - 0.5²))
= π / (4√(1 - 0.25))
= π / (4√(0.75))
≈ 1.05
So, the value of Tp is approximately 1.05.
To find Mp, we need to determine the maximum overshoot or the peak value of the system's response.
For a second-order system, the maximum overshoot can be calculated as Mp = e^((-ζπ) / √(1 - ζ²)).
Here, e represents the exponential constant.
Substituting the given ζ = 0.5 into the formula, we get:
Mp = e^((-0.5π) / √(1 - 0.5²))
≈ 0.296
So, the value of Mp is approximately 0.296.
Comparing these values with the given options, we find that the closest match is (C) Mp = 2.04, Tp = 1.05.
Therefore, the correct option is (C) Mp = 2.04, Tp = 1.05.
To know more about transfer visit:
brainly.com/question/31945253
#SPJ4
Approximately 40% of the 2017 live music audience are musical tourists. If from 2014 to 2017 the number of musical tourists increased by 75%, how many musical tourists were there in 2014 ? Recorded music comprises of 14.5% of the 2017 total national music revenue in the UK. How much money is recorded music projected to make in 2018 , assuming 7% industry growth? What percentage of the live music audience attended concerts?
The number of musical tourists in 2014 was 0.1 times the total live music audience in 2017.
To calculate the number of musical tourists in 2014, we need to work backward from the 2017 data. Let's assume the total live music audience in 2017 is represented by "X."
Given that approximately 40% of the 2017 live music audience are musical tourists, the number of musical tourists in 2017 can be calculated as 0.4 × X.
Now, we are told that from 2014 to 2017, the number of musical tourists increased by 75%. This means that the number of musical tourists in 2014 was 75% less than the number in 2017. Therefore, the number of musical tourists in 2014 can be calculated as (1 - 0.75) × 0.4 × X.
Simplifying the expression, we have:
Number of musical tourists in 2014 = 0.25 × 0.4 × X = 0.1 × X
So, the number of musical tourists in 2014 was 0.1 times the total live music audience in 2017.
Next, let's calculate the projected revenue from recorded music in 2018.
Given that recorded music comprises 14.5% of the 2017 total national music revenue in the UK, we can calculate the revenue from recorded music in 2017 as 0.145 × Total national music revenue in 2017.
Assuming a 7% industry growth from 2017 to 2018, the projected revenue from recorded music in 2018 can be calculated as follows:
Projected revenue from recorded music in 2018 = (1 + 0.07) × (0.145 × Total national music revenue in 2017)
= 1.07×0.145 × Total national music revenue in 2017
Finally, to determine the percentage of the live music audience that attended concerts, we need more information or assumptions. Without specific data, we cannot provide an accurate estimate.
Learn more about number here:
https://brainly.com/question/24908711
#SPJ11
Solve the system to find the points of intersection.
y=x2-3
y=x-3
I've tried both the substitution method and the addition method,
and I get x2-x, but I'm not sure where to go from
there.
The system has two points of intersection: (0, -3) and (1, -2).
To find the points of intersection between the two equations y=x²-3 and y=x−3, we need to set the equations equal to each other and solve for x.
By solving x²-3 for y n the second equation, we can write the equation as
x²-3=x−3.
Simplifying this equation, we get x²-x=0.
To solve this quadratic equation, we can factor out x to get x(x-1)=0.
From here, we can set each factor equal to zero and solve for x. So we have two possible solutions: x = 0 and x = 1.
To find the corresponding y-values for each x, we can substitute these
x-values back into one of the original equations.
Plugging x = 0 into y=x²-3 we get y=0²-3=-3.
Similarly, plugging x = 1 into y=x²-3 we get y=1²-3=-2.
Therefore, the system has two points of intersection: (0, -3) and (1, -2).
To learn more about quadratic equation visit:
brainly.com/question/29269455
#SPJ11
1. In a radical engine the moving parts have a total moment of inertia of 1 kg m 2
, and this is concentrated in the plane of the single crankpin. The engine is directly connected to an air-screw of moment of inertia 18 kg m 2
, by a hollow shaft having outer and inner diameters of 80 mm, and 35 mm, and a single effective length of 0.30 m. The stiffness of the crank-throw alone is 2.5×10 4
Nm/rad. Estimate the natural frequency of torsional vibration of the custen What percentage is involved if the air-screw mass is assumed to be infinite. G=83000 N/mm 2
HINT The stiffness of the crank-throw may be reduced to an equivalent length of shaft at the same diameter as the engine using q
1
= q 1
1
+ q 2
1
The percentage change in frequency is 0%.Hence, the natural frequency of torsional vibration of the custen is given by f = 25.7 / L₀^(1/2) and the percentage change in frequency is 0%.
We are given that:
Total moment of inertia of moving parts = I = 1 kgm²
Moment of inertia of air-screw = I = 18 kgm²
Outer diameter of hollow shaft = D₀ = 80 mm
Inner diameter of hollow shaft = Dᵢ = 35 mm
Length of hollow shaft = L = 0.30 m
Stiffness of the crank-throw = K = 2.5 × 10⁴ Nm/rad
Shear modulus of elasticity = G = 83000 N/mm²
We need to calculate the natural frequency of torsional vibration of the custen.
The formula for natural frequency of torsional vibration is: f = (1/2π) [(K/L) (J/GD)]^(1/2)
Where, J = Polar moment of inertia
J = (π/32) (D₀⁴ - Dᵢ⁴)
The formula for equivalent length of hollow shaft is given by:
q₁ = q₁₁ + q₁₂
Where, q₁₁ = (π/32) (D₀⁴ - Dᵢ⁴) / L₁q₁₂ = (π/64) (D₀⁴ - Dᵢ⁴) / L₂
L₁ = length of outer diameter
L₂ = length of inner diameter
For the given shaft, L₁ + L₂ = L
Let L₁ = L₀D₀ = D = 80 mm
Dᵢ = d = 35 mm
So, L₂ = L - L₁= 0.3 - L₀...(1)
For the given crank-throw, q₁ = (π/32) (D⁴ - d⁴) / L, where D = 80 mm and d = 80 mm
Hence, q₁ = (π/32) (80⁴ - 35⁴) / L
Therefore, q₁ = (π/32) (80⁴ - 35⁴) / L₀...(2)
From the formula for natural frequency of torsional vibration, f = (1/2π) [(K/L) (J/GD)]^(1/2)
Substituting the values of K, J, G, D and L from above, f = (1/2π) [(2.5 × 10⁴ Nm/rad) / (L₀) ((π/32) (80⁴ - 35⁴) / (83000 N/mm² (80 mm)³))]^(1/2)f = (1/2π) [(2.5 × 10⁴ Nm/rad) / (L₀) (18.12)]^(1/2)f = 25.7 / L₀^(1/2)...(3)
Now, if we assume that the air-screw mass is infinite, then the moment of inertia of the air-screw is infinite.
Therefore, the formula for natural frequency of torsional vibration in this case is:
f = (1/2π) [(K/L) (J/GD)]^(1/2)Substituting I = ∞ in the above formula, we get:
f = (1/2π) [(K/L) (J/GD + J/∞)]^(1/2)f = (1/2π) [(K/L) (J/GD)]^(1/2)f = 25.7 / L₀^(1/2)
So, in this case also the frequency is the same.
Therefore, the percentage change in frequency is 0%.Hence, the natural frequency of torsional vibration of the custen is given by f = 25.7 / L₀^(1/2) and the percentage change in frequency is 0%.
Learn more about elasticity
brainly.com/question/30999432
#SPJ11
Unless every professor is friendly, no student is happy. (Px: x is a professor, Fx: x is friendly, Sx: x is a student, Hx : x is happy,)
There is a direct causal relationship between a professor's friendliness and a student's happiness, and that no other factors contribute to a student's happiness.
The given statement can be symbolically represented as:
∀x ((Px → Fx) → (¬Sx → ¬Hx))
Where:
Px: x is a professor
Fx: x is friendly
Sx: x is a student
Hx: x is happy
The statement can be interpreted as follows: If every professor is friendly, then no student is unhappy.
This statement implies that if a professor is not friendly (¬Fx), then it is possible for a student to be happy (Hx). In other words, the happiness of students is contingent on the friendliness of professors.
It's important to note that this interpretation assumes that there is a direct causal relationship between a professor's friendliness and a student's happiness, and that no other factors contribute to a student's happiness.
Learn more about symbol here:
https://brainly.com/question/30763784
#SPJ11
Given that sin(x)=− 2
1
, whar Provide your answer below: sin(−x)= Given that cos(x)=−0.27, Provide your answer below: cos(−x)= Evaluate the following expression. Give your answer in radians. Provide your answer below: arccsc(−1)=
The angle whose cosecant is -1. The angle lies in the fourth quadrant where cosecant is negative.
arccsc(-1) = -π/2
Given that sin(x) = -2/1, we can determine the value of x using inverse sine function:
x = arcsin(-2/1) = -π/2
Therefore, sin(-x) = sin(-(-π/2)) = sin(π/2) = 1
Given that cos(x) = -0.27, we can determine the value of x using inverse cosine function:
x = arccos(-0.27) ≈ 1.883
Therefore, cos(-x) = cos(-1.883) ≈ 0.401
To evaluate arccsc(-1), we need to find the angle whose cosecant is -1. The angle lies in the fourth quadrant where cosecant is negative.
arccsc(-1) = -π/2
Therefore, arccsc(-1) = -π/2.
Learn more about cosecant here
https://brainly.com/question/31708994
#SPJ11
Compare the doubling times found with the approximate and exact doubling time formulas. Then use the exact doubling time formula to answer the given question. Inflation is causing prices to rise at a rate of 10% per year. For an item that costs $400 today, what will the price be in 4 years? Calculate the doubling times found with the approximate and exact doubling time. The approximate doubling time is years and the exact doubling time is years. (Round to two decimal places as needed.) Compare the doubling times found with the approximate and exact doubling time. Choose the correct answer below. O A. The approximate doubling time is more than a year greater than the exact doubling time. O B. The approximate doubling time is less than the exact doubling time. OC. The approximate doubling time is more than a year less than the exact doubling time. OD. The approximate doubling time is greater than the exact doubling time. For an item that costs $400 today, what will the price be in 4 years? $ (Round to two decimal places as needed.)
The approximate doubling time is less than the exact doubling time. The price of the item in 4 years will be approximately $532.14.
The approximate doubling time formula is commonly used when the growth rate is constant over time. It is given by the formula t ≈ 70/r, where t is the doubling time in years and r is the growth rate expressed as a percentage. In this case, the approximate doubling time would be 70/10 = 7 years.
The exact doubling time formula, on the other hand, takes into account the compounding effect of growth. It is given by the formula t = ln(2)/ln(1 + r/100), where ln denotes the natural logarithm. Using this formula with a growth rate of 10%, we find the exact doubling time to be t ≈ 6.93 years.
Comparing the doubling times found with the approximate and exact doubling time formulas, we can see that the approximate doubling time is less than the exact doubling time. Therefore, the correct answer is B. The approximate doubling time is less than the exact doubling time.
To calculate the price of an item in 4 years, we can use the formula P = P0(1 + r/100)^t, where P0 is the initial price, r is the growth rate, and t is the time in years. Plugging in the given values, with P0 = $400, r = 10%, and t = 4, we get:
P = $400(1 + 10/100)^4 ≈ $532.14
Therefore, the price of the item in 4 years will be approximately $532.14.
Learn more about logarithm here: https://brainly.com/question/30226560
#SPJ11
A precast pretensioned rib 100 mm wide and 200 mm deep, is to be connected to an M-25 Grade cast in situ concrete slab 400 mm wide and 40 mm thick. Estimate the ultimate shearing force which will cause separation of the two elements for the following two cases conforming to BS EN: 1992-1-1 code specifications: (a) If the surface is rough tamped and without links to withstand a horizontal shear stress of 0.6 N/mm 2
, and
To estimate the ultimate shearing force that will cause separation between a precast pretensioned rib and an M-25 Grade cast in situ concrete slab.
We need to consider the specifications provided in the BS EN: 1992-1-1 code. In this case, we have two scenarios to analyze.
(a) If the surface is rough tamped and without links to withstand a horizontal shear stress of 0.6 N/mm², we can calculate the ultimate shearing force as follows:
First, we need to determine the area of contact between the rib and the slab. The width of the rib is given as 100 mm, and the length of contact can be assumed to be the same as the width of the slab, which is 400 mm. Therefore, the area of contact is 100 mm * 400 mm = 40,000 mm².
Next, we can calculate the ultimate shearing force using the formula:
Ultimate Shearing Force = Shear Stress * Area of Contact
Substituting the given shear stress of 0.6 N/mm² and the area of contact, we get:
Ultimate Shearing Force = 0.6 N/mm² * 40,000 mm² = 24,000 N
Therefore, the estimated ultimate shearing force for this scenario is 24,000 Newtons.
To know more about horizontal shear click here: brainly.com/question/28495799
#SPJ11
Question 21 10/24 answered A person standing close to the edge on top of a 64-foot building throws a ball vertically upward. The quadratic 16t² + 120t+ 64 models the ball's height about the ground, h, in feet, t seconds after it function h = was thrown. a) What is the maximum height of the ball? - > Submit Question feet b) How many seconds does it take until the ball hits the ground? seconds
a) The maximum height of the ball is 739 feet.
b) The ball hits the ground after approximately 2 seconds.
To find the maximum height of the ball, we need to determine the vertex of the quadratic function. The vertex of a quadratic function in the form of ax² + bx + c can be found using the formula x = -b / (2a).
In this case, the quadratic function is 16t² + 120t + 64, where a = 16, b = 120, and c = 64.
Using the formula, we can calculate the time at which the ball reaches its maximum height:
t = -120 / (2× 16) = -120 / 32 = -3.75
Since time cannot be negative in this context, we disregard the negative value. Therefore, the ball reaches its maximum height after approximately 3.75 seconds.
To find the maximum height, we substitute this value back into the quadratic function:
h = 16(3.75)² + 120(3.75) + 64
h = 225 + 450 + 64
h = 739 feet
Therefore, the maximum height of the ball is 739 feet.
To determine how long it takes for the ball to hit the ground, we need to find the value of t when h equals 0 (since the ball is on the ground at that point).
Setting the quadratic function equal to zero:
16t² + 120t + 64 = 0
We can solve this equation by factoring or using the quadratic formula. Factoring the equation, we get:
(4t + 8)(4t + 8) = 0
Setting each factor equal to zero:
4t + 8 = 0
4t = -8
t = -8 / 4
t = -2
Since time cannot be negative in this context, we disregard the negative value. Therefore, it takes approximately 2 seconds for the ball to hit the ground.
So, the ball hits the ground after approximately 2 seconds.
Learn more about quadratic function here:
https://brainly.com/question/18958913
#SPJ11
how do I provide a counter example to demonstrate the falsity of
the statement {∀xƎyR(x, y)} |= (ƎxR(x, x) <-> ∀xR(x, x))?
The implication in the conclusion is false in this counterexample, it demonstrates that the statement "{∀xƎyR(x, y)} |= (ƎxR(x, x) <-> ∀xR(x, x))" is false.
To provide a counterexample to demonstrate the falsity of the statement "{∀xƎyR(x, y)} |= (ƎxR(x, x) <-> ∀xR(x, x))," we need to find a situation where the premise "{∀xƎyR(x, y)}" is true, but the conclusion "(ƎxR(x, x) <-> ∀xR(x, x))" is false.
Let's assume that the universe of discourse is a set of people, and the relation R(x, y) represents the statement "x is taller than y."
The premise "{∀xƎyR(x, y)}" asserts that for every person x, there exists a person y who is taller than x. We can consider this premise to be true by assuming that for every person, there is always someone taller.
Now let's examine the conclusion "(ƎxR(x, x) <-> ∀xR(x, x))." This conclusion states that there exists a person x who is taller than themselves if and only if every person is taller than themselves.
To demonstrate the falsity of the conclusion, we can provide a counterexample where the implication in the conclusion is false.
Counterexample:
Let's consider a scenario where there is one person, John, in the universe of discourse. In this case, John cannot be taller than himself because there is no one else to compare his height with. Therefore, the statement "ƎxR(x, x)" (there exists a person x who is taller than themselves) is false in this scenario.
On the other hand, the statement "∀xR(x, x)" (every person is taller than themselves) is vacuously true since there is only one person, and the statement holds for that person.
To know more about implication:
https://brainly.com/question/32545908
#SPJ4
If R is the set of real numbers, Q is the set of rational numbers, I is the set of integers, W is the set of whole numbers, N is the set of natural numbers, and S is the set of irrational numbers, simplify or answer the following. Complete parts (a) through (e) below. a. Q∩I b. S−Q c. R∪S d. Which of the sets could be a universal set for the other sets? e. If the universal set is R, how would you describe S
ˉ
? a. Q∩I= b. S−Q= c. R∪S= d. Which of the sets could be a universal set for the other sets?
a. Q∩I is the set of rational integers[tex]{…,-3,-2,-1,0,1,2,3, …}[/tex]
b. S−Q is the set of irrational numbers. It is because a number that is not rational is irrational. The set of rational numbers is Q, which means that the set of numbers that are not rational, or the set of irrational numbers is S.
S-Q means that it contains all irrational numbers that are not rational.
c. R∪S is the set of real numbers because R is the set of all rational numbers and S is the set of all irrational numbers. Every real number is either rational or irrational.
The union of R and S is equal to the set of all real numbers. d. The set R is a universal set for all the other sets. This is because the set R consists of all real numbers, including all natural, whole, integers, rational, and irrational numbers. The other sets are subsets of R. e. If the universal set is R, then the complement of the set S is the set of rational numbers.
It is because R consists of all real numbers, which means that S′ is the set of all rational numbers.
To know more about rational visit:
https://brainly.com/question/15837135
#SPJ11
In 1940 the offective federal income tax for the middle-class was 4%. In 2000 the effective federal income tax for the middle-class was 10%. What is the relative change in effective federal income tax from 1940 to 2000?
In 1940 the offective federal income tax for the middle-class was 4%. In 2000 the effective federal income tax for the middle-class was 10%, the relative change in effective federal income tax from 1940 to 2000 is 150%.
In 1940, the effective federal income tax for the middle-class was 4% and in 2000 it was 10%. To find the relative change between these two periods, we will use the relative change formula which is; Change=Final value - Initial value / Initial value. The initial value is 4% and the final value is 10%.
Therefore,Change=10% - 4% / 4%Change= 0.06 / 0.04
Change = 1.5The relative change in effective federal income tax from 1940 to 2000 is 1.5. This means that there was a 150% increase in the effective federal income tax for the middle-class from 1940 to 2000.
The percentage increase is calculated by multiplying the relative change by 100%. In this case, 1.5 × 100% = 150%.
Learn more about income tax at:
https://brainly.com/question/30092521
#SPJ11
What sum of money will grow to
$6996.18
in
five
years at
6.9%
compounded semi-annually?
Question content area bottom
Part 1
The sum of money is
$enter your response here.
(Round to the nearest cent as needed. Round all intermediate values to six decimal places as needed.
The sum of money that will grow to $6996.18 in five years at a 6.9% interest rate compounded semi-annually is approximately $5039.50 (rounded to the nearest cent).
The compound interest formula is given by the equation A = P(1 + r/n)^(nt), where A is the future value, P is the present value, r is the interest rate, n is the number of compounding periods per year, and t is the number of years.
In this case, the future value (A) is $6996.18, the interest rate (r) is 6.9% (or 0.069), the compounding periods per year (n) is 2 (semi-annually), and the number of years (t) is 5.
To find the present value (P), we rearrange the formula: P = A / (1 + r/n)^(nt).
Substituting the given values into the formula, we have P = $6996.18 / (1 + 0.069/2)^(2*5).
Calculating the expression inside the parentheses, we have P = $6996.18 / (1.0345)^(10).
Evaluating the exponent, we have P = $6996.18 / 1.388742.
Therefore, the sum of money that will grow to $6996.18 in five years at a 6.9% interest rate compounded semi-annually is approximately $5039.50 (rounded to the nearest cent).
Learn more about expression here:
https://brainly.com/question/28170201
#SPJ11
For numbers a, b > 1, the expression loga(a²b5) + logb(a/b) can be simplified to A*loga(b) + B*logb(a) + C for some numbers A, B, C. What is A+B+C?
Substituting A in any of the above equations, we getB = 3So, the required value of A + B + C = 2 + 3 + 0 (as the value of C = 0) = 5Therefore, A + B + C = 5.
Given that, For numbers a, b > 1, the expression loga(a²b⁵) + logb(a/b) can be simplified to A*loga(b) + B*logb(a) + C for some numbers A, B, C. We have to find A+B+C.So, let's solve the expression loga(a²b⁵) + logb(a/b) first,loga(a²b⁵) + logb(a/b)loga(a²b⁵) = loga(a²) + loga(b⁵) {Using product rule of logarithms}loga(a²) + loga(b⁵) = 2loga(a) + 5loga(b)logb(a/b) = logb(a) - logb(b) {Using quotient rule of logarithms}logb(a/b) = logb(a) - logb(b) = logb(a) + logb(1/b) = logb(a) - logb(b⁻¹)Now, the given expression becomes, loga(a²b⁵) + logb(a/b) = 2loga(a) + 5loga(b) + logb(a) - logb(b⁻¹)= 2loga(a) + 5loga(b) + logb(a) + logb(b⁻¹)A*loga(b) + B*logb(a) + C = Aloga(a⁻¹) + Blogb(b⁻¹) + (A + B)loga(b) [Using logarithmic identity loga(x^y) = yloga(x)]= (-A)loga(a) + (-B)logb(b) + (A+B)loga(b) + (A+B)logb(a)= (A+B)loga(b) + (A-B)logb(a)So, comparing the coefficients of the like terms from both the expressions, we getA + B = 5A - B = -1Adding these two equations, we getA + B + A - B = 5 - 1 => 2A = 4 => A = 2Now, substituting A in any of the above equations, we getB = 3So, the required value of A + B + C = 2 + 3 + 0 (as the value of C = 0) = 5Therefore, A + B + C = 5.
Learn more about Equations here,What is equation? Define equation
https://brainly.com/question/29174899
#SPJ11
Please clear explaination
Let T₁ R² R² and T₂: R² : → the formulas T₁(x, y) = (x + y,x-y) and T₂(x, y) = (6x + y, x — 6y). Find formulas for T₁¹(x, y), T₁¹(x, y), and (T₂ 0 T₁)¯¹(x, y). T₁¹(x, y)
We have given the transformation matrices T₁ and T₂, and we need to find the transformation matrices [tex]T₁¹, T₁², and (T₂ 0 T₁)¯¹[/tex].The formulas for the given transformation matrices are [tex]T₁(x, y) = (x + y,x-y)[/tex] and
[tex]T₂(x, y) = (6x + y, x — 6y).[/tex]
the transformation matrix[tex](T₂ 0 T₁)¯¹[/tex] is given by[tex](T₂ 0 T₁)¯¹(x, y) = (5/2 -5/2; 7/2 5/2) (x y) = (5x - 5y, 7x + 5y)/2[/tex]
The matrix [tex]T₁(x, y) = (x + y,x-y)[/tex] can be represented as follows:
[tex]T₁(x, y) = (1 1; 1 -1) (x y)T₁(x, y) = A (x y)[/tex] where A is the transformation matrix for T₁.2. We need to find[tex]T₁¹(x, y),[/tex] which is the inverse transformation matrix of T₁. The inverse of a 2x2 matrix can be found as follows:
If the matrix A is given by [tex]A = (a b; c d),[/tex]
then the inverse matrix A⁻¹ is given by[tex]A⁻¹ = 1/det(A) (d -b; -c a),[/tex]
We need to find the inverse transformation matrix[tex]T⁻¹.If T(x, y) = (u, v), then T⁻¹(u, v) = (x, y).[/tex]
We have[tex]u = 7x - 5yv = 7y - 5x[/tex]
Solving for x and y, we get[tex]x = (5v - 5y)/24y = (5u + 7x)/24[/tex]
So,[tex]T⁻¹(u, v) = ((5v - 5y)/2, (5u + 7x)/2)= (5v/2 - 5y/2, 5u/2 + 7x/2)= (5/2 -5/2; 7/2 5/2) (x y)[/tex] Hence, we have found the formulas for [tex]T₁¹(x, y), T₁²(x, y), and (T₂ 0 T₁)¯¹(x, y).[/tex]
To know more about matrix visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28180105
#SPJ11
Use the method of undetermined coefficients to solve the second order ODE \[ y^{\prime \prime}-4 y^{\prime}-12 y=10 e^{-2 x}, \quad y(0)=3, y^{\prime}(0)=-14 \]
The complete solution to the given ordinary differential equation (ODE)is:
[tex]y(x) = y_h(x) + y_p(x) = 5e^{6x} - 2e^{-2x} + 10e^{-2x} = 5e^{6x} + 8e^{-2x}[/tex]
To solve the second-order ordinary differential equation (ODE) using the method of undetermined coefficients, we assume a particular solution of the form:
[tex]y_p(x) = A e^{-2x}[/tex]
where A is a constant to be determined.
Next, we find the first and second derivatives of [tex]y_p(x)[/tex]:
[tex]y_p'(x) = -2A e^{-2x}\\y_p''(x) = 4A e^{-2x}[/tex]
Substituting these derivatives into the original ODE, we get:
[tex]4A e^{-2x} - 4(-2A e^{-2x}) - 12(A e^{-2x}) = 10e^{-2x}[/tex]
Simplifying the equation:
[tex]4A e^{-2x} + 8A e^{-2x} - 12A e^{-2x} = 10e^{-2x}[/tex]
Combining like terms:
[tex](A e^{-2x}) = 10e^{-2x}[/tex]
Comparing the coefficients on both sides, we have:
A = 10
Therefore, the particular solution is:
[tex]y_p(x) = 10e^{-2x}[/tex]
To find the complete solution, we need to find the homogeneous solution. The characteristic equation for the homogeneous equation y'' - 4y' - 12y = 0 is:
r² - 4r - 12 = 0
Factoring the equation:
(r - 6)(r + 2) = 0
Solving for the roots:
r = 6, r = -2
The homogeneous solution is given by:
[tex]y_h(x) = C1 e^{6x} + C2 e^{-2x}[/tex]
where C1 and C2 are constants to be determined.
Using the initial conditions y(0) = 3 and y'(0) = -14, we can solve for C1 and C2:
y(0) = C1 + C2 = 3
y'(0) = 6C1 - 2C2 = -14
Solving these equations simultaneously, we find C1 = 5 and C2 = -2.
Therefore, the complete solution to the given ODE is:
[tex]y(x) = y_h(x) + y_p(x) = 5e^{6x} - 2e^{-2x} + 10e^{-2x} = 5e^{6x} + 8e^{-2x}[/tex]
The question is:
Use the method of undetermined coefficients to solve the second order ODE y'' - 4 y' - 12y = 10[tex]e ^{- 2x}[/tex], y(0) = 3, y' (0) = - 14
To know more about differential equation:
https://brainly.com/question/32645495
#SPJ4
Use Routh-Hurwitz criterion and tell how many roots of the following polynomial (Characteristic equations are in the right half-plane, in the left half-plane, and on the imaginary axis 1.1 s^5 +3s^5 +9s^3 +8s^2 +65 +4= 0 1.2 s^5 +6s^3 +5s^2 +8s +20=0
Number of roots in the RHP of the complex plane: 31.2. Number of roots in the RHP of the complex plane: 0
The Routh-Hurwitz stability criterion is a technique for deciding the stability of linear time-invariant systems.
The Routh-Hurwitz criteria are a collection of necessary and sufficient conditions for the stability of a polynomial whose coefficients are real numbers.
It can be used to calculate the location of the roots of a polynomial's characteristic equation. Below are the solutions to the given polynomial equations:
Solution 1: Using Routh-Hurwitz criterion for s⁵ + 3s⁴ + 9s³ + 8s² + 65 + 4= 0:
Routh table is given below: s⁵ = 1 3 4 0 0
s⁴ = 3 8 65 0
s³ = 2.36 16.6 0
s² = 8.9 65 0
s¹ = 68 0
s⁰ = 4
There are three poles in the right half plane (RHP) of the complex plane for the given equation.
Hence, the system is unstable.
Solution 2: Using Routh-Hurwitz criterion for s⁵ + 6s³ + 5s² + 8s + 20=0:
Routh table is given below:
s⁵ = 1 5
s⁴ = 6 8
s³ = 2 20
s² = 4 -20
s¹ = -10
s⁰ = 20
There are no poles in the RHP of the complex plane for the given equation.
Therefore, the system is stable.
Hence, the answer is:1.1
Note: When the roots of the characteristic equation are located on the imaginary axis, the Routh-Hurwitz criteria fail.
A little change in the equation coefficients leads to no information on stability.
Hence, we cannot conclude the stability of the system.
To know more about polynomial visit:
https://brainly.com/question/11536910
#SPJ11
For what values of \( a \) and \( b \) will make the two complex numbers equal? \[ 5-2 i=10 a+(3+b) i \]
For the values of a and b to make the two complex numbers equal are: a = 1/2 and b = -2.
Given equation is 5 - 2i = 10a + (3+b)i
In the equation, 5-2i is a complex number which is equal to 10a+(3+b)i.
Here, 10a and 3i both are real numbers.
Let's separate the real and imaginary parts of the equation: Real part of LHS = Real part of RHS5 = 10a -----(1)
Imaginary part of LHS = Imaginary part of RHS-2i = (3+b)i -----(2)
On solving equation (2), we get,-2i / i = (3+b)1 = (3+b)
Therefore, b = -2
After substituting the value of b in equation (1), we get,5 = 10aA = 1/2
Therefore, the values of a and b are 1/2 and -2 respectively.The solution is represented graphically in the following figure:
Answer:For the values of a and b to make the two complex numbers equal are: a = 1/2 and b = -2.
Know more about complex numbers here,
https://brainly.com/question/20566728
#SPJ11
You are buying a new home for $416 000. You have an agreement with the savings and loan company to borrow the needed money if you pay 20% in cash and monthly payments for 30 years at an interest rate of 6.8% compounded monthly. Answer the following questions.
What monthly payments will be required?
The monthly payment required is
The monthly payment required for the loan is approximately $2,083.46.
To calculate the monthly payment required for a loan, we can use the formula for calculating the monthly mortgage payment, which is based on the loan amount, interest rate, and loan term.
Let's calculate the monthly payment using the provided information:
Loan amount: $416,000
Down payment (20% of the loan amount): 20% * $416,000 = $83,200
Loan amount after down payment: $416,000 - $83,200 = $332,800
Loan term: 30 years = 30 * 12 = 360 months
Interest rate per month: 6.8% / 12 = 0.568%
Now, using the loan amount, loan term, and interest rate per month, we can calculate the monthly payment using the formula for a fixed-rate mortgage:
Monthly payment = (Loan amount * Monthly interest rate) / (1 - (1 + Monthly interest rate)^(-Loan term))
Monthly interest rate = 0.568% = 0.00568
Plugging in the values, we have:
Monthly payment = ($332,800 * 0.00568) / (1 - (1 + 0.00568)^(-360))
≈ $2,083.46.
To know more about monthly payment refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/26192602#
#SPJ11