Following the revolution, the nation’s founders discovered that they had differing notions about what would be best for the new republic. After reading and reflecting on the assigned reading, explain three to five items of what you see as the major differences of opinion that were emerging during this time.

Quakers indeed faced intense persecution in New England during the colonial period because their beliefs clashed sharply with the prevailing Puritanism. The Puritans in New England held strict religious doctrines and emphasized conformity to their established order. Quakers, on the other hand, challenged the authority of the Puritan clergy, rejected formal religious institutions, and emphasized a more individualistic and direct relationship with God.

This stark contrast threatened the social and religious order maintained by the Puritans, leading to harsh measures against Quakers. Quakers were often subjected to public whippings, fines, imprisonment, and even banishment. The Puritan leaders viewed Quaker practices as heretical and feared the potential disruption they could bring to the established religious and social order. The persecution of Quakers gradually diminished over time as religious tolerance grew in the American colonies.

To learn more about Puritanism, click here.

https://brainly.com/question/29773668

#SPJ4

The British Prime Minister who led the effort to repeal the Stamp Act in March 1766 was Charles Watson-Wentworth, also known as the Marquess of Rockingham.

He was a Whig politician and served as Prime Minister twice, with his first term running from July 1765 to July 1766. Rockingham sympathized with the American colonists' grievances and advocated for the repeal of the Stamp Act in an effort to ease tensions and restore harmony between Britain and its colonies. His government successfully passed the Stamp Act Repeal Act of 1766, which nullified the Stamp Act and helped alleviate some of the colonial discontent.

Charles Watson-Wentworth, the Marquess of Rockingham, played a significant role in the repeal of the Stamp Act in March 1766. When the Stamp Act was passed in 1765, it imposed direct taxes on a range of printed materials in the American colonies, leading to widespread protests and boycotts.

As Prime Minister, Rockingham inherited the challenging task of managing the growing discontent in the colonies. He sympathized with the American colonists' concerns and believed that the heavy-handed taxation measures were counterproductive. He recognized the potential for escalating tensions and sought a more conciliatory approach towards the colonies.

Rockingham's government viewed the Stamp Act as a mistake and sought to repeal it to ease the strained relationship between Britain and its American colonies. The repeal effort faced opposition from those who supported the Act, particularly in the British Parliament. However, Rockingham and his allies worked to build support for the repeal and managed to gain enough parliamentary backing.

In March 1766, the British Parliament passed the Declaratory Act, asserting its authority to legislate for the colonies, but more importantly, it also repealed the Stamp Act. This repeal was seen as a significant victory for the American colonists and a step towards alleviating the tensions between Britain and its colonies.

It is worth noting that while Rockingham led the effort to repeal the Stamp Act, he was not the sole figure involved in this process. Other influential figures, both within and outside of Parliament, contributed to the movement for repeal. Notable figures such as William Pitt the Elder, Edmund Burke, and Benjamin Franklin were also instrumental in advocating for the repeal and promoting a more conciliatory approach towards the American colonies.

To know more about stamp act ,click

brainly.com/question/29740449

People continued to participate in the civil rights movement despite facing violence and terror because of their beliefs in equality, collective empowerment, hope for a better future, inspiration from leaders, and a sense of duty.

People continued to participate in the civil rights movement despite facing violence and terror for several reasons.
1. Belief in equality: Many individuals were motivated by the strong belief in the fundamental rights and equality of all individuals. They were determined to fight against racial discrimination and segregation, even in the face of violent opposition.

2. Collective empowerment: The civil rights movement provided a platform for individuals to come together and collectively demand change. By participating, people felt empowered and believed that their actions could make a difference.

3. Hope for a better future: Participants in the civil rights movement had a vision of a more just and equal society. They were motivated by the hope that their efforts would lead to positive change and improve the lives of future generations.

4. Inspiration from leaders: The charismatic leadership of figures such as Martin Luther King Jr., Rosa Parks, and Malcolm X inspired many individuals to join the movement. Their message of nonviolent resistance and equality resonated with people, encouraging them to continue despite the risks.

5. Sense of duty: Some participants felt a strong sense of duty and obligation to fight for civil rights. They saw it as their responsibility to challenge injustice and create a better society for themselves and future generations.

In conclusion, because of their beliefs in equality, collective empowerment, hope for a better future, inspiration from leaders, and a sense of duty people continued to participate in the civil rights movement despite facing violence and terror.

Learn more about civil rights movement here https://brainly.com/question/31897973

#SPJ11

Both Chávez and Huerta showed dedication dedication to helping people through their actions, such as organizing unions, strikes, and boycotts, as well as advocating for better working conditions and promoting women's rights.
1. Chávez's dedication to helping people can be seen through his establishment of the United Farm Workers (UFW) union in 1962. Through the UFW, Chávez fought for the rights and better working conditions of farmworkers, advocating for fair wages, healthcare, and improved living conditions.
2. Chávez also organized numerous strikes and boycotts to raise awareness about the struggles faced by farmworkers. These actions aimed to bring about change and improve the lives of those working in the agricultural sector.
3. Similarly, Huerta also demonstrated dedication to helping people through her activism and advocacy work. She co-founded the National Farm Workers Association (NFWA) alongside Chávez and played a vital role in organizing and mobilizing farmworkers to fight for their rights.
4. Huerta's dedication can also be seen through her efforts in promoting women's rights. She advocated for gender equality and played a crucial role in empowering women within the farmworker community and beyond.

To know more about boycotts Visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14427673

#SPJ11

Elizabeth Freeman was an African American woman who played a pivotal role in the abolitionist movement. In 1781, she successfully sued for her freedom in a Massachusetts court, becoming one of the first enslaved individuals to do so under the state constitution.

Her case, known as Brom and Bett v. Ashley, set a precedent for the abolition of slavery in Massachusetts and laid the foundation for future legal challenges. Freeman's actions not only secured her own freedom but also inspired other enslaved individuals to seek liberation.

By asserting her rights and challenging the institution of slavery, Freeman contributed to the eventual eradication of slavery in Massachusetts and beyond.

Richard Allen was a prominent African American preacher and abolitionist. In 1816, he founded the African Methodist Episcopal (AME) Church, the first independent African American denomination in the United States.

Allen's establishment of the AME Church provided a platform for African Americans to exercise their religious freedom and organize for social and political change.

The church became a center for community empowerment, education, and activism. Through his leadership, Allen advocated for the rights of African Americans, fought against racial discrimination, and promoted the importance of education and self-sufficiency within his community.

To know more about state constitution refer:

https://brainly.com/question/2559937

#SPJ11

Life for the new immigrants was challenging and often filled with hardships.

When new immigrants arrived in the United States, they faced numerous challenges. They had to adapt to a new language, culture, and way of life. Many immigrants lived in overcrowded and unsanitary conditions in tenements. They often worked in low-paying jobs with long hours and dangerous working conditions. Discrimination and prejudice were also common, making it difficult for immigrants to fully integrate into American society. However, despite these challenges, many immigrants were able to establish a better life for themselves and their families through hard work and determination.

The answer is E. Townshend Acts.

Explanation: The Townshend Acts were passed by Parliament in 1767. These acts were intended to tighten control on the colonies and enforce British authority. They imposed new taxes on imported goods such as glass, paper, paint, and tea. These acts sparked resistance and protests from the colonists, ultimately leading to increased tensions between the American colonies and the British government.

The Townshend Acts were another example of how British policies and actions contributed to the growing discontent among the American colonists.

Parliament passed the Townshend Acts in 1767 to tighten control on the colonies. The Townshend Acts were a series of laws that imposed taxes on imported goods such as glass, lead, paper, and tea. These acts were named after Charles Townshend, the British Chancellor of the Exchequer. The purpose of the Townshend Acts was to raise revenue for Britain and assert its authority over the American colonies.

The Townshend Acts led to increased tensions between the colonists and the British government. The colonists viewed these acts as a violation of their rights and protested against them. They argued that they should not be taxed without representation in the British Parliament. The Townshend Acts also sparked a boycott of British goods in the colonies.

One of the most significant events associated with the Townshend Acts was the Boston Tea Party, which took place in 1773. This act of protest involved colonists, disguised as Native Americans, boarding British tea ships in Boston Harbor and dumping chests of tea into the water. The Boston Tea Party was a direct response to the Tea Act, which was part of the Townshend Acts.

Overall, the Townshend Acts were another example of how British policies and actions contributed to the growing discontent among the American colonists. These acts played a role in fueling the revolutionary sentiments that eventually led to the American Revolution.

Learn more about Townshend Acts from given link: https://brainly.com/question/20645644

#SPJ11

In 1963, the United States passed the Clean Air Act, which established limits on emissions of pollutants and their presence in the ambient air.

The Clean Air Act was passed by the United States Congress in 1963, and it has since undergone several amendments and updates. The primary objective of this legislation is to protect and improve the quality of air in the United States by regulating and reducing the emission of pollutants.

The Clean Air Act sets specific standards and limits for various pollutants, such as sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, particulate matter, carbon monoxide, lead, and volatile organic compounds.

The Act empowers the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to establish and enforce national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS), which determine the maximum allowable concentrations of specific pollutants in the air.

These standards are periodically reviewed and revised based on scientific research and advancements. The Clean Air Act also grants the EPA authority to regulate emissions from stationary and mobile sources, such as power plants, factories, vehicles, and aircraft, through various control measures and technologies.

By implementing the Clean Air Act, the United States aims to protect human health, preserve natural resources, and prevent environmental damage caused by air pollution.

Learn more about pollution here:

https://brainly.com/question/11844236

#SPJ11

Athena rescues Odysseus and becomes his second mother by offering guidance, protection, and wisdom throughout his epic journey in the Odyssey. Her role as a maternal figure highlights her care and support for the hero in his quest to return home.

At one point, Odysseus is rescued by the goddess Athena, who becomes his second mother.

In Greek mythology, Odysseus is the legendary hero and protagonist of Homer's epic poem, the Odyssey. Throughout his long journey back home after the Trojan War, Odysseus faces numerous challenges and encounters various gods and goddesses.

Athena, the goddess of wisdom and strategic warfare, plays a significant role in Odysseus' story. She often assists him with her divine powers, guiding him towards his ultimate goal of returning to his homeland, Ithaca.

Athena becomes Odysseus' second mother because of her protective and nurturing nature towards him. She acts as a guardian and mentor, offering guidance, support, and advice. Athena also disguises herself as different individuals throughout the epic, including Odysseus' friend, Mentor, to help him in his journey.

By rescuing Odysseus from dangerous situations and providing him with wisdom, Athena ensures his survival and eventual triumph. She aids him in his battles against mythical creatures, such as the Cyclops and the suitors who have taken over his palace in Ithaca.

Athena's role as Odysseus' second mother symbolizes her maternal instincts and protective nature towards him. She becomes a maternal figure who watches over him and helps him navigate the challenges he faces during his long and arduous journey.

In summary, Athena rescues Odysseus and becomes his second mother by offering guidance, protection, and wisdom throughout his epic journey in the Odyssey. Her role as a maternal figure highlights her care and support for the hero in his quest to return home.

Learn more about goddess Athena from given link: https://brainly.com/question/903461

#SPJ11

One criticism of the executive order known as "Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States," commonly referred to as the "travel ban," was that it was seen as discriminatory and targeted towards individuals based on their religion or nationality.

The executive order, which was initially issued by President Donald Trump in January 2017 and underwent several revisions and legal challenges, imposed restrictions on travel to the United States from several predominantly Muslim-majority countries, including Iran, Libya, Somalia, Syria, and Yemen.

The travel ban faced legal challenges on the grounds that it violated the U.S. Constitution's Establishment Clause, which prohibits the government from favoring one religion over another. Critics argued that singling out predominantly Muslim countries for travel restrictions suggested religious discrimination and perpetuated negative stereotypes against Muslims.

Opponents of the travel ban also argued that it had negative consequences for families, educational opportunities, business travelers, and refugees fleeing from conflict and persecution. They claimed that the order undermined America's reputation as a welcoming and inclusive nation and could fuel anti-American sentiment abroad.

To learn more about travel ban follow:

https://brainly.com/question/21285710

#SPJ11

Achilleus' desire to seek revenge for the death of his friend Patroklus leads to significant consequences in the epic narrative.

In Homer's epic poem "The Iliad," Achilleus' desire for revenge upon the death of his close companion Patroklus has a profound impact on the story. The death of Patroklus, caused by the Trojan hero Hektor, ignites Achilleus' wrath and fuels his thirst for vengeance. As a result, Achilleus reenters the battle, displaying extraordinary ferocity and skill, seeking to avenge Patroklus' death.

His reemergence on the battlefield turns the tide of the Trojan War, as Achilleus' prowess is unmatched by any other warrior. He engages in direct combat with Hektor, eventually slaying him, which leads to the fall of Troy. Achilleus' relentless pursuit of revenge ultimately contributes to the fulfillment of fate and the ultimate downfall of the Trojan city.

However, it is worth noting that Achilleus' obsession with revenge also results in personal losses and tragedy. His quest for vengeance blinds him to the pleas for mercy from Priam, the king of Troy, and it ultimately leads to his own demise. Nevertheless, Achilleus' desire for revenge plays a central role in shaping the events of "The Iliad" and has far-reaching consequences for both the characters and the outcome of the Trojan War.

Learn more about Achilleus: https://brainly.com/question/19788607

#SPJ11

Slavery before the Trans-Atlantic Trade European Christianity and Slavery Freedom, Slavery, and Race in the New World New World Racism Plantations and the Trans-Atlantic

1. Expansion of territory: Through successful military campaigns, African kings could conquer and annex new territories. This expansion allowed them to increase their wealth, resources, and influence. 2. Tribute and taxation: Victorious African kings often demanded tribute or taxes from the conquered territories. This additional revenue helped them finance their courts, armies, and infrastructure projects. 3. Control over trade routes: Many African kingdoms were strategically located along important trade routes. By controlling these routes, kings could impose tolls or tariffs on merchants, further enhancing their wealth and power.

4. Capture of valuable resources: War provided African kings with the opportunity to capture valuable resources such as gold, ivory, slaves, and agricultural land. These resources could be used for trade, wealth accumulation, and strengthening their own kingdom. 5. Prestige and reputation: Successful military campaigns boosted the reputation and prestige of African kings. This could attract alliances, tribute, and trade partnerships, further enhancing their power and influence.

In conclusion, African kings benefited from warfare by expanding their territory, collecting tribute and taxes, controlling trade routes, capturing valuable resources, and gaining prestige and reputation.

To know more about Racism visit:

https://brainly.com/question/23754542

#SPJ11

King Charles I's action in 1629 that convinced many Puritans to consider emigration as their only hope of avoiding religious oppression in England is not specified in the given information.

The question states that King Charles I took a specific action in 1629 that led many Puritans to believe that their only option to escape religious oppression in England was to emigrate. However, the provided information does not mention the specific action undertaken by King Charles I during that time.

To accurately answer the question, it is necessary to identify the specific action taken by King Charles I in 1629 that had such a significant impact on the Puritans. Without that information, it is not possible to provide an explanation regarding the action and its implications on the Puritans' decision to emigrate.

In order to give a more precise response, it would be necessary to have knowledge of the historical events and actions undertaken by King Charles I during the mentioned time period.

Without that information, it is not possible to provide a detailed explanation regarding the action that led to the Puritans considering emigration as their only means to escape religious oppression in England.

Learn more about King Charles here:

https://brainly.com/question/30394602

#SPJ11

Native Americans resisted relocation through various methods. One of the main ways they resisted was through direct political and legal action.

Here's a step-by-step explanation:
Native American tribes challenged the relocation policies through lawsuits in the U.S. court system. They argued that the government's actions violated their treaty rights and sovereignty. Some tribes, such as the Cherokee Nation, utilized the legal system to their advantage. They took their case all the way to the Supreme Court in the landmark case of Worcester v. Georgia (1832). The court ruled in favor of the Cherokee, recognizing their right to self-governance and rejecting forced removal.

Native Americans also resisted relocation through diplomatic efforts. Tribal leaders engaged in negotiations with the government, seeking to protect their land and preserve their way of life. They aimed to secure agreements that would allow them to remain on their ancestral territories. In addition to legal and political tactics, Native Americans also employed nonviolent resistance. They organized protests, demonstrations, and boycotts to raise awareness about their situation and garner support from the general public. Some tribes, such as the Seminoles in Florida, resorted to armed resistance. They fought against relocation by engaging in guerrilla warfare, defending their lands, and resisting the encroachment of settlers.

Tagging:

To know more about sovereignty visit:

brainly.com/question/3135619

#SPJ11

The achievement of the National Convention was the abolition of slavery in France and the French colonies.

The National Convention, which was the governing body of France during the French Revolution, made the historic decision to abolish slavery on February 4, 1794. This landmark event was a significant step towards the liberation of countless individuals who were enslaved and marked a progressive shift in the values and principles of the French Republic.

By officially outlawing slavery, the Convention aligned itself with the ideals of liberty, equality, and fraternity that were at the core of the revolution.

This decision had far-reaching implications, not only within France but also in its colonies. Slavery was a deeply entrenched institution in the French colonies, particularly in places like Saint-Domingue (present-day Haiti), where the slave population greatly outnumbered the free population.

The abolition of slavery by the National Convention was met with both enthusiasm and resistance in the colonies, eventually leading to uprisings and the establishment of independent states.

The abolition of slavery by the National Convention reflected a significant turning point in the fight for human rights and equality. It set a precedent for other nations and inspired abolitionist movements around the world.

The decision underscored the Convention's commitment to creating a more just and egalitarian society, and it remains an important milestone in the history of human rights.

Learn more about the abolition of slavery in France and its impact on the French colonies in the following paragraphs.

Slavery was a deeply entrenched institution in France's colonies, especially in the sugar-producing regions of the Caribbean. The Convention's decision to abolish slavery had a profound impact on the social, economic, and political landscape of these colonies.

In Saint-Domingue, for example, the largest slave colony in the Caribbean, the news of the abolition sparked hope and resistance among the enslaved population. This eventually led to the Haitian Revolution, a violent struggle for independence and the establishment of the first black republic in the world.

The decision to abolish slavery in France and its colonies was not without opposition. Some members of the Convention, particularly those representing the colonies, voiced concerns about the economic repercussions of freeing the enslaved population.

They argued that the plantations and industries heavily relied on slave labor and that their abolition would lead to economic collapse. However, the Convention ultimately prioritized the principles of liberty and equality over economic considerations.

The abolition of slavery by the National Convention was a transformative moment in history. It represented a significant step towards the recognition of universal human rights and challenged the prevailing notion of racial superiority.

While the struggle for equality and the complete eradication of slavery would continue for years to come, the Convention's decision laid the foundation for future abolitionist movements and contributed to the eventual dismantling of slavery worldwide.

Learn more about slavery

brainly.com/question/866336

#SPJ11

Investigative reporters in the late 1800s wrote sensationally yet factually, and they exposed corruption in the government, insurance industry, and railroads, earning them the nickname of muckrakers.

Muckrakers uncovered widespread fraud, bribery, and other misdeeds within public and corporate institutions, as well as creating an awareness of the injustices faced by vulnerable citizens. Investigative reporters in the late 1800s worked to uncover the truth and bring these injustices to light. They were brave and relentless in their pursuit of the truth, often working at the risk of their own safety.

Their articles exposed corporations such as Standard Oil for false advertising and greed, and public scandals like the Panic of 1893. During this era, investigative reporting gave way to numerous reforms, such as the Pure Food and Drug Act, the Meat Inspection Act, the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, and the Modernization of the Interstate Commerce Commission. Investigative reporters in the late 1800s paved the way for a society that puts more value on truth and justice. Through their work, corruption and injustice could no longer remain hidden, as the muckrakers brought dishonesty into the public spotlight.

To know more about Meat Inspection Act , click here:

https://brainly.com/question/30554924

#SPJ4

Conflict sometimes developed between English colonists and the other peoples of North America due to various factors.

The conflicts between English colonists and other peoples of North America can be attributed to a combination of cultural differences, land disputes, and competition for resources.
1. Cultural Differences: English colonists and the indigenous peoples of North America had different cultural practices, beliefs, and societal structures. These differences often led to misunderstandings and clashes, as each group had their own norms and values.
2. Land Disputes: The English colonists sought to expand their settlements and establish permanent colonies. This often resulted in conflicts with the indigenous peoples who had longstanding claims to the land. The colonists' encroachment on Native American territories led to tensions and hostilities.
3. Resource Competition: The English colonists were motivated by economic interests, such as finding valuable resources like fur, timber, and land suitable for agriculture. This pursuit of resources sometimes led to clashes with the Native American tribes, who relied on the same resources for their own survival.
Overall, the combination of cultural differences, land disputes, and competition for resources contributed to the development of conflicts between English colonists and the other peoples of North America.

To know more about the colonists, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28779360

#SPJ11

The rebirth of a city can take various forms, and the role of the arts can play a significant role in this transformation. Let's explore how the arts can contribute to the revitalization of a city using specific examples from my city.

1. Public Art Installations: One way the arts can contribute to the rebirth of a city is through the creation of public art installations. These installations can range from sculptures and murals to interactive exhibits. For instance, in my city, we have a large sculpture garden in the downtown area, featuring works from local and international artists. These installations not only beautify the city but also create a sense of identity and pride among the residents. 2. Cultural Festivals: The arts can also play a crucial role in organizing cultural festivals that celebrate the diverse heritage of a city. For example, my city hosts an annual music and dance festival that showcases various cultural traditions. This festival attracts both locals and tourists, providing an opportunity for artists to showcase their talents and promoting cultural exchange. Such events not only bring communities together but also contribute to the economic growth of the city through increased tourism.

3. Arts Districts: Creating designated arts districts within a city can provide a platform for artists and creative entrepreneurs to thrive. These districts can include galleries, performance spaces, and studios. In my city, we have a vibrant arts district that has transformed an old industrial area into a hub for creative expression. This district has attracted artists, designers, and creative professionals, revitalizing the neighborhood and fostering a vibrant cultural scene. 4. Arts Education Programs: Investing in arts education programs can nurture young talent and encourage creative expression. Schools and community organizations can offer classes in various art forms, including painting, theater, music, and dance. In my city, we have an after-school program that offers free art classes to children from underserved communities. These programs not only provide an avenue for self-expression but also develop critical thinking and problem-solving skills.

Overall, the arts can have a transformative impact on a city's rebirth. Public art installations, cultural festivals, arts districts, and arts education programs all contribute to the revitalization and cultural enrichment of a community. By investing in the arts, cities can create vibrant and inclusive spaces that foster creativity, community engagement, and economic growth.

To know more about Arts visit: 

https://brainly.com/question/5566447

#SPJ11

The book "The Nerves of Government: Models of Political Communication and Control" by Karl W. Deutsch, published in 1963, explores various models of political communication and control within a government.

1. The author: Karl W. Deutsch is the author of the book. He was a political scientist and renowned scholar in the field of international relations.2. Publication details: The book was published in 1963 by the Free Press of Glencoe in London. 3. Topic: The book focuses on models of political communication and control. It delves into how governments function, communicate, and maintain control over their citizens.4. Political communication: The book likely discusses the ways in which governments communicate with their citizens, such as through media, propaganda, public speeches, and official announcements. It may explore how different communication strategies impact the relationship between the government and the governed.

5. Models of control: The book might discuss different models or theories of political control, examining how governments maintain their authority and regulate society. It may cover topics such as law enforcement, surveillance, political institutions, and public policy.6. Analytical approach: Karl W. Deutsch is known for his analytical and systematic approach to political science. In this book, he may present theoretical frameworks and empirical evidence to support his arguments and observations.

Overall, "The Nerves of Government: Models of Political Communication and Control" by Karl W. Deutsch offers insights into the dynamics of political systems and their communication strategies. It provides a framework for understanding how governments interact with their citizens and maintain control over their territories.

To know more about Communication visit:
https://brainly.com/question/22558440
#SPJ11  

The geographic advantage that Europeans had in their effort to found empires in the Americas was primarily due to their advanced technology and the power of their weapons.

As a result, the Europeans were able to establish themselves in America and assert their power over the native people who had been living there for thousands of years. Another significant geographic advantage that Europeans had in the Americas was their proximity to the western hemisphere. This proximity allowed the Europeans to maintain trade and commerce with their mother country, which helped to bolster their economic power and influence over the Americas.

Furthermore, Europeans also had the advantage of familiarity with the climate, terrain, and vegetation of the Americas. This familiarity allowed them to exploit the land and its resources, which helped to fuel their expansion and colonization efforts. Finally, Europeans had access to better navigation and shipbuilding technology, which allowed them to navigate the treacherous Atlantic Ocean and explore the Americas with relative ease.

In conclusion, the combination of advanced technology, proximity, familiarity, and navigation technology gave Europeans the geographic advantage they needed to establish empires in the Americas.

To know more about Europeans visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30493006

#SPJ11

The ban on alcohol was called Prohibition. So option A is correct.

Prohibition, known as Prohibition, was an important social and political movement in the United States. Enforced by the 18th Amendment, the ban is intended to eliminate the production, sale, and consumption of alcoholic beverages.

This had a profound impact on American society, leading to various consequences such as the emergence of organized crime, organized crime, and the underground alcohol market. The ban was eventually proven unenforceable and was repealed in 1933 with the ratification of the 21st Amendment, marking the end of this controversial era in American history. 

Learn more about Prohibition:

https://brainly.com/question/27862866

#SPJ4

Polygyny is a marital practice characterized by a man having multiple wives simultaneously. It is a form of polygamy, which refers to the practice of having multiple spouses.

In the case of polygyny, a man is allowed to marry and have legal and social relationships with multiple women at the same time. This practice was widespread in various African cultures before the era of the Transatlantic Slave Trade. Polygyny often served as a social and economic institution, allowing for the establishment of large and extended families, strengthening social ties, and facilitating the division of labor within households.

It was also influenced by cultural, religious, and traditional beliefs and norms prevalent in different African societies.

Learn  more about African societies

https://brainly.com/question/30377332

#SPJ11

The pamphlet that encompassed Enlightenment theories about the rights of man, denounced monarchy as incompatible with liberty, and galvanized the colonies against Britain in the 1770s was "Common Sense" by Thomas Paine.

"Common Sense" was published in January 1776, at a time when the American colonies were deeply divided on the issue of independence from Britain. Paine's pamphlet played a crucial role in shifting public opinion and inspiring the colonists to break free from British rule.

In "Common Sense," Paine articulated Enlightenment ideas about the rights of individuals and the inherent equality of all men. He argued that it was unreasonable for a small island like Britain to govern a vast continent like North America, and that it was only just and natural for the American colonies to pursue independence.

Paine forcefully denounced monarchy as incompatible with the principles of liberty and equality. He questioned the legitimacy of hereditary rule and argued that power should be derived from the consent of the governed.

To learn more about Enlightenment theories follow:

https://brainly.com/question/9871507

#SPJ11

The Mujahedeen turned on the US after the fall of the Soviet Union for a variety of reasons.

Firstly, many of the Mujahedeen had been known to ally with communist forces during the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan, so upon the collapse of the U.S.S.R., some of the group wanted to keep their alliance and continue to oppose the West. Secondly, the U.S. had attacked the capital city of Kabul without apparent cause, leading to strong anti-Western sentiment amongst many of the Mujahedeen.

Thirdly, Maoist allies had pushed for the Mujahedeen to take up a more confrontational stance towards the US in order to spread their revolutionary themes, further pushing the Mujahedeen away from the American government. Finally, the Mujahedeen viewed the US as the most powerful Western nation and saw their anti-Western sentiment as an opportunity for them to make a statement.

To know more about Mujahedeen , click here:

https://brainly.com/question/14053922

#SPJ4

Religion played a complex role in the system of slavery, as it was used both to justify and challenge the institution.

In the system of slavery, religion played a multifaceted role. On one hand, religious beliefs were manipulated and distorted by slaveholders to justify the practice of slavery.

They selectively interpreted biblical passages to argue that slavery was a natural and ordained social order, with slaves being depicted as inferior beings destined for servitude. This religious justification provided a moral cover for the enslavement of African peoples and helped maintain social control over enslaved individuals.

On the other hand, religion also provided enslaved individuals and abolitionists with a source of hope, resistance, and motivation to challenge the system. Many slaves embraced Christianity and found solace in its teachings of liberation and equality.

They saw parallels between their own oppression and the biblical narratives of liberation, such as the story of Moses leading the Israelites out of slavery in Egypt.

This religious fervor fueled slave rebellions, as well as the abolitionist movement, which drew upon religious principles to argue for the inherent dignity and rights of all humans.

In conclusion, religion played a contradictory role in the system of slavery. It served as a tool of oppression, enabling slaveholders to justify their actions, while also providing enslaved individuals and abolitionists with a moral framework and motivation to resist and challenge the institution of slavery.

Learn more about Religion here:

https://brainly.com/question/2763180

#SPJ11

The Chinese historical annals talk about a steppe nomadic people further west known as the Wu Sun who historians claim are the Yuèzhi of Roman historical sources.

The Wu Sun people are recorded in Chinese sources of the Later Han dynasty (25–220 CE), and were settled along the Ili river, which flows from the Tien Shan mountain range. They were a confederation of nomadic tribes who spoke Turkic languages, and were known to the Han Chinese as the Wu Sun, a name which can be translated as "Powerful People".

The Wu Sun people made incursions into Han China during the Later Han period, and were eventually defeated by the armies of the Han dynasty, who occupied the area around the Ili river. The Wu Sun people continued to exist as a distinct group, however, and some of them migrated further westwards, into the area around the Aral Sea

where they came into contact with the Yuèzhi, a people who had migrated westwards from the area around the Gansu corridor.The Wu Sun people and the Yuèzhi had a number of similarities, such as their nomadic lifestyle and their use of horses in warfare

Know more about nomadic here:

https://brainly.com/question/3739487

#SPJ11

The North Atlantic Current is a warm ocean current that flows from the Gulf of Mexico to the North Atlantic Ocean. It has several significant impacts on climate and ecosystems in the region.

The significance of the North Atlantic Current:
1. Climate regulation: The North Atlantic Current transports warm water from the tropics to higher latitudes, moderating the climate in regions like Western Europe. It helps to maintain a relatively mild climate, compared to other regions at similar latitudes.

2. Gulf Stream: The North Atlantic Current is an extension of the Gulf Stream, a powerful warm current. The Gulf Stream transports large amounts of heat energy, affecting weather patterns and providing energy for storms in the North Atlantic.

3. Marine biodiversity: The warm water brought by the North Atlantic Current supports diverse marine ecosystems. It provides favorable conditions for a variety of species, including fish, mammals, and marine plants.

4. Influence on sea ice: The North Atlantic Current plays a role in the melting of sea ice in the Arctic. It transports warm water towards the Arctic, contributing to the melting and retreat of sea ice.

5. Oceanic circulation: The North Atlantic Current is part of the global thermohaline circulation system, also known as the ocean conveyor belt. It helps to distribute heat and nutrients around the globe, impacting climate patterns on a global scale.

In summary, the North Atlantic Current has significant effects on climate, marine ecosystems, sea ice, and global oceanic circulation. Its warm waters influence weather, biodiversity, and the distribution of heat energy in the North Atlantic region.

To know more about North Atlantic Current:

https://brainly.com/question/33443717

#SPJ11

The political, cultural, economic, religious, military, and social characteristics of the Ancient Roman Empire and Ancient China during the Han Dynasty shared several similarities.

Politically, both empires had centralized governments with an emperor at the top of the hierarchy. Both empires had complex administrative systems and bureaucracies to govern their vast territories.

Culturally, both empires valued education and placed importance on the arts. Literature, philosophy, and the fine arts flourished in both Rome and China during this time. Additionally, both empires had a strong sense of cultural identity and were proud of their respective civilizations.

Economically, both empires had extensive trade networks. Rome had an expansive road system that facilitated trade, while China developed the Silk Road, which connected them to the West. Both empires relied on agriculture as their primary economic activity, and both had slave labor systems.

Religiously, both empires were polytheistic, believing in multiple gods and goddesses. However, in Ancient Rome, the emperors were often deified and worshipped as gods themselves, while in Ancient China, there was a reverence for ancestors and a belief in the Mandate of Heaven.

Military-wise, both empires had well-trained and disciplined armies. Rome had its powerful legions, while China had a well-organized and structured military known as the Terracotta Army. Both empires also sought to expand their territories through conquest and had established extensive border defenses.

Socially, both empires had rigid social hierarchies. In Rome, there were distinct classes such as the patricians, plebeians, and slaves, while in China, the society was organized into a strict Confucian-based social structure known as the "Four Occupations."

In summary, the Ancient Roman Empire and Ancient China during the Han Dynasty shared similarities in their political structures, cultural values, economic systems, religious beliefs, military organizations, and social hierarchies. Despite the geographical distance between them, these two empires displayed common characteristics that shaped their respective civilizations.

know more about  Roman Empire click here:

https://brainly.com/question/27985217

#SPJ11

Answer:

During President Washington's administration and into the 1790s, U.S. policy toward Native Americans followed a mixed approach:

• The US government initially pursued a policy of peaceful coexistence and negotiations with Native tribes. Secretary of War Henry Knox favored a conciliatory approach and respect for Native sovereignty.

• However, expansionist sentiments and the desire for more Native lands pushed the US government to pursue a more aggressive policy. Treaties were made that ceded large amounts of Native territory, often through questionable or unfair means.

• The US government began implementing policies of cultural assimilation, encouraging Native tribes to adopt European-American lifestyle and agriculture. This was seen as a way to reduce conflicts over lands.

• Military force was occasionally used against Native tribes who resisted US expansion or refused to cede their lands. The Northwest Indian War broke out in the 1790s between the US and a confederation of Native tribes in the Midwest.

• The 1790 Indian Trade and Intercourse Act placed tribes under federal protection but also restricted Native sovereignty by requiring government approval for land sales. This laid the groundwork for future federal control over Native affairs.

In summary, while the Washington administration pursued a moderately conciliatory approach at first, expansionist pressures and conflicts led to a mixture of negotiation, coercion, assimilation policies and occasional military force that undermined Native sovereignty. It set a pattern that would continue in the following decades.

The reader can infer that the man who interrogates young Elie is attempting to protect him and his father by making them appear older.

Based on the passage from Night by Elie Wiesel, the reader can infer that the man who interrogates young Elie is an inmate in the concentration camp. Despite being in a position of power within the camp hierarchy, the man shows compassion and concern for Elie and his father by instructing them to lie about their ages. By falsely claiming to be older (eighteen and forty instead of fifteen and fifty), the man is likely trying to ensure their survival.

In the harsh and brutal environment of the concentration camp, being younger or older may carry different risks, and by making Elie and his father appear older, the man may believe that they have a better chance of surviving or being assigned to less demanding labor. Hence, the reader can infer that the man interrogating young Elie is attempting to protect him and his father by making them appear older, potentially with the intention of increasing their chances of survival in the camp.

Learn more about reader here:

https://brainly.com/question/3579369

#SPJ11

Here is the complete question:

After arriving at Auschwitz, male and female prisoners are separated. The SS officers then instruct the group of men to form "ranks of five" to be interrogated.

"Hey, kid, how old are you?"

The man interrogating me was an inmate. I could not see his face, but his voice was weary and warm.

"Fifteen."

"No. You're eighteen."

"But I'm not," I said, "I'm fifteen."

"Fool. Listen to what I say."

Then he asked my father, who answered:

"I'm fifty."

"No." The man now sounded angry. "Not fifty. You're forty. Do you hear? Eighteen and forty."

-Night,Elie Wiesel

Which inference can a reader make about the man who interrogates young Elie?