Flag question
You buy halibut at $30 per
pound,
One portion of seared
halibut requires 6 ounces of
halibut.
How much does the halibut
for one portion cost? Round
to the nearest cent.​

Answer:

  54

Step-by-step explanation:

  [tex](\sqrt{6} + \sqrt{24})^2=(\sqrt{6}+2\sqrt{6})^2\\\\=(3\sqrt{6})^2=(3^2)(6)=\boxed{54}[/tex]

Answer:  initial cost 26956.00 USD

value after 6 years approx= 21100.00 USD

Step-by-step explanation:

The initial cost is the price of new car , it means t ( time)=0

Substitute t by 0 in our equation and get the initial car's value

v(0)= 26956*0.96^0=26956.00 USD

The value after 6 years:  substitute t by 6

v(6)=26956*0.96^6=21100.00 USD

Answer:

The probability that washing dishes tonight will take me between 12 and 14 minutes is 0.1333.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the random variable X represent the time it takes to wash the dishes.

The random variable X is uniformly distributed with parameters a = 10 minutes and b = 15 minutes.

The probability density function of X is as follows:

[tex]f_{X}(x)=\frac{1}{b-a};\ a<X<b,\ a<b[/tex]

Compute the probability that washing dishes will take between 12 and 14 minutes as follows:

[tex]P(12\leq X\leq 14)=\int\limits^{12}_{14} {\frac{1}{15-10} \, dx[/tex]

                           [tex]=\frac{1}{5}\int\limits^{12}_{14} {1} \, dx \\\\=\frac{1}{5}\times [x]^{14}_{12}\\\\=\frac{1}{15}\times [14-12]\\\\=\frac{2}{15}\\\\=0.1333[/tex]

Thus, the probability that washing dishes tonight will take me between 12 and 14 minutes is 0.1333.

Answer:

101

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that

r(t)=[tex]<t^2,1-t,4t>[/tex]

We have to find the derivative of r(t).a(t) at t=2

a(2)=<7,-3,7> and a'(2)=<3,2,4>

We know that

[tex]\frac{d(uv)}{dx}=u'v+v'u[/tex]

Using the formula

[tex]\frac{d(r(t)\cdot at(t))}{dt}=r'(t)\cdot a(t)+r(t)\cdot a'(t)[/tex]

[tex]\frac{d(r(t)\cdot at(t))}{dt}=<2t,-1,4>\cdot a(t)+<t^2,1-t,4t>\cdot a'(t)[/tex]

Substitute t=2

[tex]\frac{d(r(t)\cdot at(t))}{dt}_|t=2=<4,-1,4>\cdot a(2)+<4,-1,8>\cdot a'(2)[/tex]

[tex]\frac{d(r(t)\cdot at(t))}{dt}_|t=2=<4,-1,4>\cdot <7,-3,7>+<4,-1,8>\cdot <3,2,4>[/tex]

[tex]\frac{d(r(t)\cdot at(t))}{dt}_|t=2=28+3+28+12-2+32=101[/tex]

The derivation of the equation will be "101".

Given expression is:

r(t) = 〈t², 1 - t, 4t〉

Let,

a(2) = <7, -3, 7>

a'(2) = <3, 2, 4>

As we know,

→ [tex]\frac{d(uv)}{dx}[/tex] = u'v + v'u

By using the formula, the derivation will be:

→ [tex]\frac{d(r(t).at(t))}{dt}[/tex] = r'(t).a(t) + r(t).a'(t)

                  = <2t, -1, 4>.a(t) + <t², 1 - t, 4t>.a'(t)

By substituting "t = 2", we get

                  =  <4, -1, 4>.a(2) + <4, -1, 8>. a'(2)

                  = <4, -1, 4>.<7, -3, 7> + <4, -1, 8>.<3, 2, 4>

                  = 28 + 3 + 28 + 12 - 2 + 32

                  = 101

Thus the response above is appropriate.

Find out more information about derivatives here:

https://brainly.com/question/22068446

Answer: 0.00153

Step-by-step explanation:

Given: An experiment consists of dealing 7 cards from a standard deck of 52 playing cards.

Number of ways of dealing 7 cards from 52 cards = [tex]^{52}C_7[/tex]

Since there are 13 clubs and 13 spades.

Number of ways of getting exactly 4 clubs and 3 spades=[tex]^{13}C_4\times\ ^{13}C_3[/tex]

Now, the probability of being dealt exactly 4 clubs and 3 spades

[tex]=\dfrac{^{13}C_4\times\ ^{13}C_3}{^{52}C_7}\\\\\\=\dfrac{{\dfrac{13!}{4!(9!)}\times\dfrac{13!}{3!10!}}}{\dfrac{52!}{7!45!}}\\\\=\dfrac{715\times286}{133784560}\\\\=0.00152850224271\approx0.00153[/tex]

Hence,  the probability of being dealt exactly 4 clubs and 3 spades = 0.00153

Answer:

D.

Step-by-step explanation:

The graph of a function and its inverse are symmetric with respect with the line y = x.

On each graph you are given, plot the line y = x. If the two functions are symmetric with respect to the line y = x, then the graph does show a function and its inverse.

You will see this is true only for choice D.

It appears to be a parallelogram. But without actual numerical data, I don't think it's possible to prove this or not. I could be missing something though.

Answer:

1/6 hours

Step-by-step explanation:

It takes leo 15 minutes = 15/60 = 0.25 hours to circle to school with speed of

12km/hr .

Distance covered = speed*Time.

Distance covered = 12*0.25

Distance covered= 3 km

So the distance to be covered each time is 3km.

If speed increase to 18 km/he

Time taken = distance/speed

Time taken = 3/18

Time= 1/6 hour

Or 1/6 * 60 = 60/6 = 10 minutes

Step-by-step explanation:

4x + 0.2=0.9

transposing 0.2 to RHS

=> 4x =0.9-0.2 => 4x=0.7

transposing 4 to RHS

=> x=0.7÷4

=> x=0.175

if it helps plzz mark it as brainliest

Answer: add 0.2

Step-by-step-explanation:

Answer:

180 in²

Step-by-step explanation:

The area of a parallelogram is base times height.

b × h

18 × 10

= 180

The area of the rug is 180 in².

Answer:

Should be a 50/50 chance

Step-by-step explanation:

When you flip a coin there are 2 possible chances, heads or tails. That means that out of 100 there should a 50/50 chance to get both. By Tegan getting 63 heads it show how the mentailty that it should be a perfect 50/50 chnace to get heads is not real and therefore not fair.

(but in real life this is what happens. Its not fair).

Answer:

95% of confidence interval for the proportion of registered voters who are in favor of raising income taxes to pay down the national debt.

(0.414 ,0.474)

Step-by-step explanation:

Step(i):-

Given sample proportion

                                    p⁻ = 44.4 % = 0.444

Random sample size 'n' = 1049

Given margin of error for 95% confidence level = 3 % = 0.03

Step(ii):-

95% of confidence interval for the proportion is determined by

[tex](p^{-} - Z_{\alpha }\sqrt{\frac{p^{-} (1-p^{-} }{n} } , p^{-} + Z_{\alpha }\sqrt{\frac{p^{-} (1-p^{-} }{n} })[/tex]

we know that

Margin of error for 95% confidence level is determined by

[tex]M.E = Z_{\alpha }\sqrt{\frac{p^{-} (1-p^{-}) }{n} }[/tex]

Step(iii):-

Now

95% of confidence interval for the proportion is determined by

[tex](p^{-} - M.E, p^{-} + M.E)[/tex]

Given Margin of error

                              M.E = 0.03

Now 95% of confidence interval for the proportion

[tex](0.444 - 0.03, 0.444+ 0.03)[/tex]

(0.414 ,0.474)

Conclusion:-

95% of confidence interval for the proportion of registered voters who are in favor of raising income taxes to pay down the national debt.

(0.414 ,0.474)

yes

Step-by-step explanation:

parallelogram are quadrilaterals with two sets of parallel sides. since square must be quadrilaterals with two sets of parallel sides ,then all squares are parallelogram ,a trapezoid is quadrilateral.

Answer: -64

Step-by-step explanation: Since we know that -4 x -4 is a positive, it equals 16, then a positive plus a negative equals a negative, so 16 x -4 equals -64

Answer:

-64

Step-by-step explanation:

-4 • -4 • -4

-4*-4 = 16

16*-4

-64

Answer:

x < -4

Step-by-step explanation:

-3x > 12

Divide both parts with -3.

-3x/-3 > 12/-3

x < -12/3

x < -4

It would be any number bigger then the number 4, so try 5.

Answer:

5 + 52.25x

Step-by-step explanation:

flat rate plus cost per pound times number of pounds

5 + 52.25x

Answer:

Week 3

Step-by-step explanation:

Week one was 1,0

Week two was 2,1

Week three was 3,3 which is the same number the teams have won

Therefore the answer is week 3

Hope this helps

Answer:

The correct snswer is

There are three basic methods for solving quadratic equations:factoring, using the quadratic formula, completing the square.

Step-by-step explanation:

hope this works out!!!

Answer:

I feel like you are mistaken on the first question...

6 plus 27 equals 33.

33 equals 100 percent.

What is 6 over 33? 0,18.

What's 27 over 33? 0,82.

Therefore, 19 plus 12 equals 31.

19 divided by 31 equals 0,61.

12 over 31 equals 0,39.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Hello!

A regression model was determined in order to predict the number of earthquakes above magnitude 7.0 regarding the year.

^Y= 164.67 - 0.07Xi

Y: earthquake above magnitude 7.0

X: year

The researcher wants to test the claim that the regression is statistically significant, i.e. if the year is a good predictor of the number of earthquakes with magnitude above 7.0 If he is correct, you'd expect the slope to be different from zero: β ≠ 0, if the claim is not correct, then the slope will be equal to zero: β = 0

The hypotheses are:

H₀: β = 0

H₁: β ≠ 0

α: 0.05

The statistic for this test is a student's t: [tex]t= \frac{b - \beta }{Sb} ~~t_{n-2}[/tex]

The calculated value is in the regression output [tex]t_{H_0}= -3.82[/tex]

This test is two-tailed, meaning that the rejection region is divided in two and you'll reject the null hypothesis to small values of t or to high values of t, the p-value for this test will also be divided in two.

The p-value is the probability of obtaining a value as extreme as the one calculated under the null hypothesis:

p-value: [tex]P(t_{n-2}\leq -3.82) + P(t_{n-2}\geq 3.82)[/tex]

As you can see to calculate it you need the information of the sample size to determine the degrees of freedom of the distribution.

If you want to use the rejection region approach, the sample size is also needed to determine the critical values.

But since this test is two tailed at α: 0.05 and there was a confidence interval with confidence level 0.95 (which is complementary to the level of significance) you can use it to decide whether to reject the null hypothesis.

Using the CI, the decision rule is as follows:

If the CI includes the "zero", do not reject the null hypothesis.

If the CI doesn't include the "zero", reject the null hypothesis.

The calculated interval for the slope is: [-0.11; -0.04]

As you can see, both limits of the interval are negative and do not include the zero, so the decision is to reject the null hypothesis.

At a 5% significance level, you can conclude that the relationship between the year and the number of earthquakes above magnitude 7.0 is statistically significant.

I hope this helps!

(full output in attachment)

Answer:

x     y

8     -2

0     0

12    3

Step-by-step explanation:

The equation you are given is:

[tex] y = \dfrac{1}{4}x [/tex]

To find y, replace the given x-value in the table with x in the equation, and solve for y.

When x = -8, you get, replacing x with -8:

[tex] y = \dfrac{1}{4}(-8) [/tex]

Simplify:

[tex] y = -2 [/tex]

This gives you the line in the table:

-8     -2

When x = 0, you get, replacing x with 0:

[tex] y = \dfrac{1}{4}(0) [/tex]

Simplify:

[tex] y = 0 [/tex]

This gives you the line on the table:

0     0

To find x, replace the given y-value in the table with y in the equation, and solve for x.

When y = 3, you get, replacing y with 3:

[tex] 3 = \dfrac{1}{4}x [/tex]

Simplify:

[tex] 3 \times 4 = \dfrac{1}{4}x \times 4 [/tex]

[tex] 12 = x [/tex]

This gives you the line in the table:

12     3

Answer:

It's A

Step-by-step explanation:

Trust me i did it in geogebra

Answer:

The solutions are the roots of the quadratic. They are found where the graph crosses the x-axis.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The tree was 175 centimeters tall when Vlad moved into the house.

7 years passed from the time Vlad moved in until the tree was 357 centimeters tall.

Step-by-step explanation:

The height of the tree, in centimeters, in t years after Vlad moved into the house is given by an equation in the following format:

[tex]H(t) = H(0) + at[/tex]

In which H(0) is the height of the tree when Vlad moved into the house and a is the yearly increase.

He measured it once a year and found that it grew by 26 centimeters each year.

This means that [tex]a = 26[/tex]

So

[tex]H(t) = H(0) + 26t[/tex]

4.5 years after he moved into the house, the tree was 292 centimeters tall. How tall was the tree when Vlad moved into the house?

This means that when t = 4.5, H(t) = 292. We use this to find H(0).

[tex]H(t) = H(0) + 26t[/tex]

[tex]292 = H(0) + 26*4.5[/tex]

[tex]H(0) = 292 - 26*4.5[/tex]

[tex]H(0) = 175[/tex]

The tree was 175 centimeters tall when Vlad moved into the house.

How many years passed from the time Vlad moved in until the tree was 357 centimeters tall?

This is t for which H(t) = 357. So

[tex]H(t) = H(0) + 26t[/tex]

[tex]H(t) = 175 + 26t[/tex]

[tex]357 = 175 + 26t[/tex]

[tex]26t = 182[/tex]

[tex]t = \frac{182}{26}[/tex]

[tex]t = 7[/tex]

7 years passed from the time Vlad moved in until the tree was 357 centimeters tall.

Answer:

Odds of being a case = 1.90

Step-by-step explanation:

Relationship between artificial sweeteners and bladder cancer.

Amongst the cases, 1,293 had used artificial sweeteners in the past, while 1,707 had never used artificial sweeteners.

used AS = 1,293

Not used AS = 1,707

Among the controls, 855 had used sweeteners and 2,145 had not.

We can prepare a table from the above information,

                                 Cases              Controls

used AS                  a = 1,293            b = 855

Not used AS           c = 1,707            d = 2,145

The odds of being a case may be calculated as

[tex]$ odds = \frac{a \times d}{b \times c} $[/tex]

[tex]$ odds = \frac{1,293 \times 2,145}{855 \times 1,707} $[/tex]

[tex]odds = 1.90[/tex]

Therefore, we can conclude that a person having bladder cancer used artificial sweeteners was 1.90 times the odds that a person without bladder cancer used artificial sweeteners .

Answer:

Since RT = 12, TU = 6 and RS = 24, T and U are the midpoints of RS and TS respectively. This means that SU + UT = RT.

Answer:

su+ut=rt

Step-by-step explanation:

Hey there! I'm happy to help!

PART A

Let's break down each terms in the expression to find the factors that make it up and see the greatest thing they all have in common

To break up the numbers, we keep on dividing it until there are only prime numbers left.

TERM #1

Three is a prime number, so there is no need to split it up.

3pf²= 3·p·f·f              

TERM #2

We have a negative coefficient here. First, let's ignore the negative sign and find all of the factors, which are just 7 and 3. One of them has to be negative and one has to be positive for it to be negative. It could be either way, and when comparing to other, we might want one to be negative or positive to match another part of the expression to find the greatest common factor. So, we will use the plus or minus sign ±, knowing that one must be positive and one must be negative.

-21p²2f= ±7·±3 (must be opposite operations) ·p·p·f

TERM #3

6pf= 2·3·p·f

TERM #4

Since 42 is made up of 3 prime factors (2,3,7), one of them or all three must be negative, because two negatives would make it positive. We will use the plus-minus sign again on all three because it could be just one is negative or all three are, but we don't know. We can use these later to find the greatest common factor when matching.

-42p²= ±2·±3·±7·p·p

Now, let's pull out all of our factors and see the greatest thing all four terms have in common

TERM 1: 3·p·f·f  

TERM 2: ±7·±3·p·p·f     (7 and 3 must end up opposite signs)

TERM 3: 2·3·p·f

TERM 4: ±2·±3·±7·p·p   (one or three of the coefficients will be negative)

Let's first look at the numbers they share. All of them have a three. We will rewrite Term 2 as -7·3·p·p·f afterwards because 3 must be positive to match. With term four, the 3 has to positive so not all three can be negative, so that means that either the 2 or 7 has to be negative, but in the end we they will make a -14 so it does not matter which one because.

Now, with variables. All of them have one p, so we will keep this.

Almost all had an f except the fourth, so this cannot be part of the GCF.

So, all the terms have 3p in common. Let's take the 3p out of each term and see what we have left. In term 4 we will combine our ±7 and ±2 to be -14 because one has to be negative.

TERM 1: f·f

TERM 2: -7·p·f

TERM 3: 2·f

TERM 4: -14·p

The way we will write this is we will put 3p outside parentheses and put what is left of all of our terms on the inside of the parentheses.

3p(f·f+-7·p·f+2·f-14·p)

We simplify these new terms.

3p(f²-7pf+2f-14p)

Now we combine like terms.

3p(f²-7pf-14p)

If you used the distributive property to undo the parentheses you could end up with our original expression.

PART B

Completely factoring means the equation is factored enough that you cannot factor anymore. The only things we have left to factor more are the terms inside the parentheses. Although there won't be something common between all of them, one might have pairs with one and not another, and this can still be factored out, and this can be put into (a+b)(a+c). Let's find what we have in common with the three terms in the parentheses.

TERM 1: f·f

TERM 2: -7·p·f

TERM 3: 2· -7·p (I just put 7 as negative and 2 as positive already for matching)

Term 1 and 2 have an f in common.

Terms 2 and 3 have a -7p in common.

So, we see that the f and the -7p are what can be factored out among all of the terms, so let's take it out of all of them and see what is left.

Term 1: f

Term 2: nothing left here

Term 3: 2

So, this means that all we have left is f+2. If we multiply that by f-7p we will have what was in the parentheses in our answer from Part A, and we cannot simplify this any further. This means that our parentheses from Part A= (f-7p)(f+2). This shows that (f-7p) is multiplied by (f+2)

Don't forget the GCF 3p; that's still outside the parentheses!

Therefore, the answer here is 3p(f-7p)(f+2).

Have a wonderful day! :D