Find the taylor polynomials of degree n approximating 1/(2-2x) for x near 0.
For n = 3, P3(x) = ____
For n= 5, P5(x) = ____
For n = 7, P7(x) = ____

Answer:

a

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

the answer would be the first one

Step-by-step explanation:

the equation of the curve in the form y = f(x) is:

y = 4x^(-4/3)

We can eliminate the parameter t by expressing it in terms of x and substituting into the equation for y.

From the equation x = e^(-3t), we have:

t = -(1/3)ln(x)

Substituting this expression for t into the equation y = 4e^(4t), we get:

y = 4e^(4(-(1/3)ln(x))) = 4(x^(-4/3))

what is parameter?

In mathematics, a parameter is a quantity that defines the characteristics of a mathematical object or system, and whose value can be changed. It is typically denoted by a letter, such as a, b, c, etc., and is often used in mathematical equations or models to express the relationships between different variables.

To learn more about curve visit:

brainly.com/question/28793630

#SPJ11

Answer: 485 dolls approximately,

Tom should be able to assemble 485 dolls after 90 days if he continues to work at the same rate as before, according to the given information.  This means that y = 5(90) + 35, and solving it gives y = 485.The scatter plot showed that as the days went by, Tom assembled more dolls. He collected data on how many dolls he assembled per day and placed the data on a scatter plot. He labeled the r-axis "days" and the y-axis "dolls assembled." He found a line of best fit for the data, which has the equation y = 5x +35. This equation allows us to estimate the number of dolls that Tom could assemble after any number of days. We were asked to find the number of dolls that Tom should be able to assemble after 90 days, and the answer is 485 dolls.

Know more about scatter plot  here:

https://brainly.com/question/30646450

#SPJ11

Answer:

The number of ways to allocate the total sample size of 45 into three conditions with n = 15 each is q ≈ 1.276 × 10^38

Step-by-step explanation:

o find q, we need to know the number of all possible ways to allocate the total sample size (n = 45) into the three conditions with equal sample sizes (n = 15 each). This is given by the multinomial coefficient:

q = (n choose n1, n2, n3) = (n!)/(n1! * n2! * n3!)

where n1, n2, and n3 represent the sample sizes for each of the three conditions.

Since each condition has the same sample size, we have n1 = n2 = n3 = 15, so:

q = (45!)/(15! * 15! * 15!)

To simplify this expression, we can use the fact that:

n! = n * (n-1) * (n-2) * ... * 2 * 1

Therefore:

45! = 45 * 44 * 43 * ... * 2 * 1

15! = 15 * 14 * 13 * ... * 2 * 1

Substituting these into the expression for q, we get:

q = (45 * 44 * 43 * ... * 2 * 1) / [(15 * 14 * 13 * ... * 2 * 1) * (15 * 14 * 13 * ... * 2 * 1) * (15 * 14 * 13 * ... * 2 * 1)]

Simplifying the denominator, we get:

q = (45 * 44 * 43 * ... * 2 * 1) / (15!)^3

Using a calculator or computer program to evaluate this expression, we get:

q = 1.276 × 10^38

Therefore, the number of ways to allocate the total sample size of 45 into three conditions with n = 15 each is q ≈ 1.276 × 10^38.

To know more about multinomial coefficient refer here

https://brainly.com/question/10787369#

#SPJ11

The expression is rationalize to give C  [tex]= \frac{\sqrt{Em} }{m}[/tex]

From the information given, we have that the surd form is expressed as;

C=[tex](\frac{E}m} )^(^1^/^2^)[/tex]

This is represented as;

C =[tex]= \frac{\sqrt{E} }{\sqrt{m} }[/tex]

We need to know that the process of simplifying a fraction by removing surds (such as square roots or cube roots) from its denominator is known as rationalization of surds. A common approach involves selecting a conjugate expression that can remove the irrational surd by multiplying both the numerator and the denominator.

Then, we have;

C = [tex]= \frac{\sqrt{E} * \sqrt{m} }{\sqrt{m} * \sqrt{m} }[/tex]

multiply the values, we have;

C = [tex]\frac{\sqrt{Em} }{m}[/tex]

Learn more about surds at: https://brainly.com/question/840021

#SPJ4

We can use the binomial distribution to solve this problem.

Let X be the number of people out of 15 who used an online travel website to book their hotel. Then, X follows a binomial distribution with n = 15 and p = 0.7.

The expected value of X is given by:

E(X) = n × p

Substituting the values given in the problem, we get:

E(X) = 15 × 0.7 = 10.5

Therefore, we would expect 10 people (rounding down 10.5 to the nearest whole person) out of 15 to use an online travel website to book their hotel.

To Know more about binomial distribution refer here

https://brainly.com/question/31197941#

#SPJ11

The total number of different types of jeans available is 30. The correct answer is e. 30.

Since each design can be made with either short or long length, and there are 3 designs in total, there are 2 options for length for each design.

Additionally, there are 5 color patterns available for each design and length combination.

Therefore, the total number of different types of jeans available can be calculated as follows:

2 (options for length) x 3 (designs) x 5 (color patterns) = 30.

Therefore, there are 30 different types of jeans offered in all.

Hence, the correct answer is an option (e).

Learn more about permutation here:

brainly.com/question/1216161

#SPJ1

Since f'(x) exists and is non-zero at all other values of x except x = 2, we know that f(x) is either increasing or decreasing in each interval between the critical points (-2, 2), (2, 3.5), (3.5, 5.5), and (5.5, +∞).

We can use the first derivative test to determine whether each critical point corresponds to a relative maximum or minimum or neither. Since f'(-2) = f'(3.5) = f'(5.5) = 0, these critical points may correspond to relative extrema. However, we cannot use the first derivative test at x = 2 because f'(2) does not exist.

To determine whether the critical point at x = -2 corresponds to a relative maximum or minimum, we can examine the sign of f'(x) in the interval (-∞, -2) and in the interval (-2, 2). Since f'(-2) = 0, we can't use the first derivative test directly. However, if we know that f'(x) is negative on (-∞, -2) and positive on (-2, 2), then we know that f(x) has a relative minimum at x = -2.

Similarly, to determine whether the critical points at x = 3.5 and x = 5.5 correspond to relative maxima or minima, we can examine the sign of f'(x) in the intervals (2, 3.5), (3.5, 5.5), and (5.5, +∞).

If f'(x) is positive on all of these intervals, then we know that f(x) has a relative maximum at x = 3.5 and at x = 5.5. If f'(x) is negative on all of these intervals, then we know that f(x) has a relative minimum at x = 3.5 and at x = 5.5.

To determine the absolute maximum and minimum of f(x) on the interval [0, 4], we need to consider the critical points and the endpoints of the interval.

Since f(x) is increasing on (5.5, +∞) and decreasing on (-∞, -2), we know that the absolute maximum of f(x) on [0, 4] occurs either at x = 0, x = 4, or at one of the critical points where f(x) has a relative maximum.

Similarly, since f(x) is decreasing on (2, 3.5) and increasing on (3.5, 5.5), we know that the absolute minimum of f(x) on [0, 4] occurs either at x = 0, x = 4, or at one of the critical points where f(x) has a relative minimum.

for such more question on interval

https://brainly.com/question/28272404

#SPJ11

To locate the absolute maximum and absolute minimum values of f(x) over the interval [0,4], we need to use the First Derivative Test and the Second Derivative Test.

First, we need to find the critical points of f(x) in the interval [0,4]. We know that f'(x) exists and is non-zero at all other values of x, so the critical points must be located at x = 0, x = 2, and x = 4.

At x = 0, we can use the First Derivative Test to determine whether it's a local maximum or local minimum. Since f'(-2) = 0 and f'(x) is non-zero at all other values of x, we know that f(x) is decreasing on (-∞,-2) and increasing on (-2,0). Therefore, x = 0 must be a local minimum.

At x = 2, we know that f'(2) doesn't exist. This means that we can't use the First Derivative Test to determine whether it's a local maximum or local minimum. Instead, we need to use the Second Derivative Test. We know that if f''(x) > 0 at x = 2, then it's a local minimum, and if f''(x) < 0 at x = 2, then it's a local maximum. Since f'(x) is non-zero and continuous on either side of x = 2, we can assume that f''(x) exists at x = 2. Therefore, we need to find the sign of f''(2).

If f''(2) > 0, then f(x) is concave up at x = 2, which means it's a local minimum. If f''(2) < 0, then f(x) is concave down at x = 2, which means it's a local maximum. To find the sign of f''(2), we can use the fact that f'(x) is zero at x = -2, 3.5, and 5.5. This means that these points are either local maxima or local minima, and they must be separated by regions where f(x) is increasing or decreasing.

Since f'(-2) = 0, we know that x = -2 must be a local maximum. Therefore, f(x) is decreasing on (-∞,-2) and increasing on (-2,2). Similarly, since f'(3.5) = 0, we know that x = 3.5 must be a local minimum. Therefore, f(x) is increasing on (2,3.5) and decreasing on (3.5,4). Finally, since f'(5.5) = 0, we know that x = 5.5 must be a local maximum. Therefore, f(x) is decreasing on (4,5.5) and increasing on (5.5,∞).

Using all of this information, we can construct a table of values for f(x) in the interval [0,4]:

x | f(x)
--|----
0 | local minimum
2 | local maximum or minimum (using Second Derivative Test)
3.5 | local minimum
4 | local maximum

To determine whether x = 2 is a local maximum or local minimum, we need to find the sign of f''(2). We know that f'(x) is increasing on (-2,2) and decreasing on (2,3.5), which means that f''(x) is positive on (-2,2) and negative on (2,3.5). Therefore, we can conclude that x = 2 is a local maximum.

Therefore, the absolute maximum value of f(x) in the interval [0,4] must be located at either x = 0 or x = 4, since these are the endpoints of the interval. We know that f(0) is a local minimum, and f(4) is a local maximum, so we just need to compare the values of f(0) and f(4) to determine the absolute maximum and absolute minimum values of f(x).

Since f(0) is a local minimum and f(4) is a local maximum, we can conclude that the absolute minimum value of f(x) in the interval [0,4] must be f(0), and the absolute maximum value of f(x) in the interval [0,4] must be f(4).

Visit here to learn more about absolute maximum brainly.com/question/29030328

#SPJ11

If "A" denotes the event that student takes statistics and B denotes event that the student is senior, the probability of P(A' or B) is (c) 0.82.

To find P(A' or B), we want to find the probability that a student is not a senior or take statistics (or both).

We know that the total number of students surveyed is 100, and out of those students : 15 seniors take statistics; 35 seniors take calculus

18 juniors take statistics,  32 juniors take calculus.

The probability P(A' or B) is written as P(A') + P(B) - P(A' and B);

To find the probability of a student not taking statistics, we add the number of students who take calculus (seniors and juniors) and divide by the total number of students:

⇒ P(A') = (35 + 32) / 100 = 0.67;

The probability of student being a senior,

⇒ P(B) = (15 + 35)/100 = 0.50,

Next, to find probability of student who is not take statistics and is a senior, which are 35 students,

So, P(A' and B) = 35/100 = 0.35;

Substituting the values,

We get,

P(A' or B) = 0.67 + 0.50 - 0.35 = 0.82;

Therefore, the correct option is (c).

Learn more about Probability here

brainly.com/question/30189391

#SPJ1

The given question is incomplete, the complete question is

A student surveyed 100 students and determined the number of students who take statistics or calculus among seniors and juniors. Here are the results.

              Statistics   Calculus

Senior           15              35

Junior           18               32

Let A be the event that the student takes statistics and B be the event that the student is a senior.

What is P(A' or B)?

(a) 0.18

(b) 0.68

(c) 0.82

(d) 0.97

The coefficient of determination of 0.49 means that approximately 49% of the variability in the dependent variable can be explained by the independent variable(s) in the regression model. In other words, the model is able to explain 49% of the total variation in the response variable.

The coefficient of correlation of 0.70 indicates a strong positive linear relationship between the two variables. It means that there is a high degree of association between the independent and dependent variables, and that the change in one variable is closely related to the change in the other variable. A correlation coefficient of 0.70 is considered a moderate to strong correlation, with values closer to 1 indicating a stronger relationship.

Know more about coefficient of determination here:

https://brainly.com/question/28975079

#SPJ11

The total number of 12-digit binary sequences that have no two 0s occurring consecutively is a(12) + b(12).

To count the number of 12-digit binary sequences where no two 0s occur consecutively, we can use a recursive approach.

Let a(n) be the number of n-digit binary sequences that end in 1 and have no two 0s occurring consecutively, and let b(n) be the number of n-digit binary sequences that end in 0 and have no two 0s occurring consecutively.

We can then obtain the total number of n-digit binary sequences that have no two 0s occurring consecutively by adding a(n) and b(n).

For n = 1, we have:

a(1) = 0 (since there are no 1-digit binary sequences that end in 1 and have no two 0s occurring consecutively)

b(1) = 1 (since there is only one 1-digit binary sequence that ends in 0)

For n = 2, we have:

a(2) = 1 (since the only 2-digit binary sequence that ends in 1 and has no two 0s occurring consecutively is 01)

b(2) = 1 (since the only 2-digit binary sequence that ends in 0 and has no two 0s occurring consecutively is 10)

For n > 2, we can obtain a(n) and b(n) recursively as follows:

a(n) = b(n-1) (since an n-digit binary sequence that ends in 1 and has no two 0s occurring consecutively must end in 01, and the last two digits of the previous sequence must be 10)

b(n) = a(n-1) + b(n-1) (since an n-digit binary sequence that ends in 0 and has no two 0s occurring consecutively can end in either 10 or 00, and the last two digits of the previous sequence must be 01 or 00)

Using these recursive formulas, we can calculate a(12) and b(12) as follows:

a(3) = b(2) = 1

b(3) = a(2) + b(2) = 2

a(4) = b(3) = 2

b(4) = a(3) + b(3) = 3

a(5) = b(4) = 3

b(5) = a(4) + b(4) = 5

a(6) = b(5) = 5

b(6) = a(5) + b(5) = 8

a(7) = b(6) = 8

b(7) = a(6) + b(6) = 13

a(8) = b(7) = 13

b(8) = a(7) + b(7) = 21

a(9) = b(8) = 21

b(9) = a(8) + b(8) = 34

a(10) = b(9) = 34

b(10) = a(9) + b(9) = 55

a(11) = b(10) = 55

b(11) = a(10) + b(10) = 89

a(12) = b(11) = 89

b(12) = a(11) + b(11) = 144

Therefore, the total number of 12-digit binary sequences that have no two 0s occurring consecutively is a(12) + b(12) =

Learn more about binary sequences here

https://brainly.com/question/26618884

#SPJ11

The Pearson's linear correlation coefficient, also known as the Pearson's r, measures the strength and direction of association between two continuous random variables. It ranges from -1 to 1.

A value near ±1 indicates a strong linear association, with positive values signifying a direct relationship and negative values an inverse relationship.

If the value is close to ±1, the association is indeed quasi-perfectly linear. However, it's important to note that correlation doesn't imply causation.

Learn more about pearson correlation at

https://brainly.com/question/15353989

#SPJ11

Answer: To find the absolute maximum of the function g(x) = 2x^2 + x - 1 over the interval [-3,5], we need to evaluate the function at the critical points of g(x) that lie within the interval [-3,5] and at the endpoints of the interval.

First, we find the critical points of g(x) by taking the derivative of g(x) and setting it equal to zero:

g'(x) = 4x + 1 = 0

Solving for x, we get x = -1/4. This critical point lies within the interval [-3,5], so we need to evaluate g(x) at x = -1/4.

Next, we evaluate g(x) at the endpoints of the interval:

g(-3) = 2(-3)^2 - 3 - 1 = 14

g(5) = 2(5)^2 + 5 - 1 = 54

Finally, we evaluate g(x) at the critical point:

g(-1/4) = 2(-1/4)^2 - 1/4 - 1 = -25/16

Comparing these three values, we see that the absolute maximum of g(x) over the interval [-3,5] is 54, which occurs at x = 5.

To find the absolute maximum of g(x) = 2x^2 + x - 1 over the interval [-3,5], we need to check the critical points and the endpoints of the interval.

Taking the derivative of g(x), we get:

g'(x) = 4x + 1

Setting g'(x) = 0 to find critical points, we get:

4x + 1 = 0

4x = -1

x = -1/4

The only critical point in the interval [-3,5] is x = -1/4.

Now we check the function at the endpoints of the interval:

g(-3) = 2(-3)^2 - 3 - 1 = 14

g(5) = 2(5)^2 + 5 - 1 = 54

Finally, we check the function at the critical point:

g(-1/4) = 2(-1/4)^2 - 1/4 - 1 = -25/16

Therefore, the absolute maximum of g(x) over the interval [-3,5] is g(5) = 54.

To know more about absolute maximum, refer here :

https://brainly.com/question/29152841#

#SPJ11

The value of the line integral of a vector field F along the path C is (10, 24). No, the line integral of F along C does not depend on the joining (0,0) to (1,6).

To evaluate the line integral of F along the path C, we need to parameterize the path. Since the path is given by y=6x^2 and it goes from (0,0) to (1,6), we can parameterize it as follows:

r(t) = (t, 6t^2), 0 ≤ t ≤ 1

The differential of r(t) is dr/dt = (1, 12t), so we can write:

F(r(t)).dr = (5t(6t^2), 8(6t^2))(1, 12t)dt

= (30t^2, 96t^3)dt

Now we can integrate this expression over the range of t from 0 to 1:

∫[0,1] (30t^2, 96t^3)dt = (10, 24)

Therefore, the value of the line integral of F along C is (10, 24).

The answer to whether the integral depends on the joining (0,0) to (1,6) is no. This is because the line integral only depends on the values of the vector field F and the path C, and not on the specific points used to parameterize the path.

As long as the path C is the same, the line integral will have the same value regardless of the choice of points used to define the path.

To know more about vector field refer here :

https://brainly.com/question/24332269#

#SPJ11

Kelly's rectangle has four square corners.

A rectangle is a quadrilateral with four sides and four angles. In a rectangle, opposite sides are equal in length, and all angles are right angles (90 degrees). A square is a special type of rectangle where all sides are equal in length

. Since a square is a type of rectangle, it also has four right angles, making all its corners square corners. Therefore, Kelly's rectangle, which is not specified as a square, may have different side lengths, but it will still have four right angles, resulting in four square corners.

These corners are formed by the intersection of the sides at right angles, creating a shape with sharp, 90-degree angles. So, regardless of the specific dimensions of Kelly's rectangle, it will always have four square corners.

Learn more about angle here:

https://brainly.com/question/31818999

#SPJ11

In ten years the town will have a population of  29,792

Future Population = Initial Population * (1 + Growth Rate) ^ Number of Years

In this case, the initial population is 3,200, the growth rate is 25% (0.25), and the number of years is 10.

Future Population = 3,200 * (1 + 0.25) ^ 10

Now, calculate the value inside the parentheses:

1 + 0.25 = 1.25

Now, raise this value to the power of 10:

[tex]1.25 ^ 1^0 \\=\\9.31[/tex]

Finally, multiply the initial population by the result:

3,200 * 9.31

= 29,792

Read more on growth rate here: https://brainly.com/question/30611694

#SPJ1

If a is an invertible n×n matrix and b is an n×p matrix, then the equation ax=b has a unique solution given by [tex]x=a^{-1}b.[/tex]

A⁻¹B is the unique solution to the matrix equation AX = B, given that A is an invertible n x n matrix and B is an n x p matrix.

Based on the given terms, it seems like we want to know why A⁻¹B is a unique solution to the matrix equation AX = B, where A is an invertible n x n matrix and B is an n x p matrix.
A is an invertible n x n matrix, which means it has a unique inverse, A⁻¹.

This is because A is a square matrix and its determinant is non-zero.
B is an n x p matrix.

To find the solution for the matrix equation AX = B, we need to find a matrix X that satisfies this equation.
To solve for X, multiply both sides of the equation by the inverse of A, A⁻¹:
A⁻¹(AX) = A⁻¹B
Since A⁻¹A = I (the identity matrix), the equation becomes:
IX = A⁻¹B
Since the identity matrix times any matrix is the same matrix, X = A⁻¹B.
The uniqueness of the solution comes from the fact that A has a unique inverse, A⁻¹.

If there were multiple inverses, there could be multiple solutions, but since A⁻¹ is unique, so is the solution X.

For similar question on matrix equation.

https://brainly.com/question/28777961

#SPJ11

The equation that can be used to find the value of 'n' in centimeters is 1/2 (5n + 3n + 8) = 193.5, and the value of 'n' is 24.19 cm.

The given figure is shown below. The area of the given figure is 193.5 cm².A trapezium has two parallel sides, and its area can be found using the formula; area = 1/2 (a + b) hWhere,a and b are the parallel sides of the trapezium, and h is the height.The height of the given trapezium is 'n'.

Therefore, the equation that can be used to find the value of 'n' in centimeters is:1/2 (5n + 3n + 8) = 193.5On simplifying the above equation, we get;8n + 8 = 2 × 193.516n = 387n = 387/16The value of 'n' is; n = 24.19 cm.Therefore, the equation that can be used to find the value of 'n' in centimeters is 1/2 (5n + 3n + 8) = 193.5, and the value of 'n' is 24.19 cm.

Learn more about trapezium here,

https://brainly.com/question/31061366

#SPJ11

For the joint probability density function of x and y, which is given by f(x,y)=6/7(x² + xy/2); then the probability that P(x > y) is 15/56.

To find P(x > y), we need to integrate the joint probability density function f(x, y) over the region where x > y.

The joint probability density function of x and y is : f(x,y)=6/7(x² + xy/2); 0<x<1, 0<y<2;

The probability P(x>y) can be written as :

P(x > y) = ∫₀¹∫₀ˣ6/7(x² + xy/2)dx.dy;

P(x > y) = 6/7 × ∫₀¹(x³ + x³/4)dx;

P(x > y) = 6/7 × [x⁴/4 + x⁴/16]₀¹;

P(x > y) = 6/7 × [5x⁴/16]₀¹;

P(x > y) = 6/7 × (5/16) = 30/112 = 15/56.

Therefore, the required probability is 15/56.

Learn more about Probability here

https://brainly.com/question/31388103

#SPJ4

The given question is incomplete, the complete question is

The joint probability density function of x and y is given by f(x,y)=6/7(x² + xy/2); 0<x<1, 0<y<2

Find P(x > y).

To verify that u1, u2, and u3 are an orthogonal set, we need to check that the dot product of any two vectors in the set is equal to zero.

Let u1 = [a, b, c], u2 = [d, e, f], and u3 = [g, h, i]. Then, the dot products are u1·u2 = ad + be + cf, u1·u3 = ag + bh + ci, and u2·u3 = dg + eh + fi. If these dot products are all equal to zero, then the set is orthogonal.

Next, to find the orthogonal projection of y into Span{u1, u2, u3}, we need to use the formula:

proj(y) = (y·u1/||u1||²)u1 + (y·u2/||u2||²)u2 + (y·u3/||u3||²)u3

Where ||u|| represents the norm or magnitude of the vector u. This formula represents the vector projection of y onto each individual vector in the span, added together. The resulting vector proj(y) will be the projection of y onto the span of u1, u2, and u3.

Note that this formula only works if u1, u2, and u3 are an orthogonal set. If they are not orthogonal, we need to use the Gram-Schmidt process to find an orthonormal set first.

To know more about dot products click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/29097076#

#SPJ11

The number that represents the sum of 82.545 and 128.580 with the correct number of significant digits is 211.13 (Option C).

To determine the sum of two numbers with the correct number of significant digits, we need to consider the least number of decimal places in the given numbers. In this case, 82.545 has three decimal places, and 128.580 has three decimal places as well.

When adding these numbers, we align the decimal points and perform the addition as usual: 82.545 + 128.580 = 211.125. However, to ensure the result has the appropriate number of significant digits, we need to round it.

Since the least number of decimal places in the given numbers is three, we round the result to three decimal places. Looking at the fourth decimal place, which is '5' in this case, we round the result to the nearest thousandth. The '5' will cause the digit to round up, resulting in the final answer of 211.13.

Therefore, the number that represents the sum of 82.545 and 128.580 with the correct number of significant digits is 211.13 (Option C).

Learn more about appropriate number  here :

https://brainly.com/question/28983655

#SPJ11

The Taylor polynomials T2 and T3 centered at x=3 for the function f(x)=x^4-7x are: T2(x)=23(x−3)4−56(x−3)+27, T3(x)=23(x−3)4−56(x−3)+27−14(x−3)3

To find the Taylor polynomial centered at x=3, we need to find the derivatives of f(x) up to the nth derivative and evaluate them at x=3. Then, we use the formula for the Taylor polynomial of degree n centered at x=a:

Tn(x)=f(a)+f′(a)(x−a)+f′′(a)(x−a)2+⋯+f(n)(a)(x−a)n/n!

For this particular problem, we are given that a=3 and f(x)=x^4-7x. Taking the derivatives of f(x), we get:

f'(x)=4x^3-7

f''(x)=12x^2

f'''(x)=24x

f''''(x)=24

Evaluating these derivatives at x=3, we get:

f(3)=-54

f'(3)=29

f''(3)=108

f'''(3)=72

f''''(3)=24

Plugging these values into the Taylor polynomial formula, we get the expressions for T2 and T3 as stated above.

Learn more about Taylor polynomial here:

https://brainly.com/question/30481013

#SPJ11

When working with polar coordinates, it's important to remember that r represents the distance from the origin to the point in question. Since we're looking for a positive value of r, we'll choose the positive square root when solving for r. This ensures that we're measuring the distance in a positive direction, away from the origin.

For example, let's say we have a point in Cartesian coordinates (3, -4). To find the polar coordinates with r > 0, we first need to find the value of r. We can use the Pythagorean theorem to do this:

r^2 = x^2 + y^2
r^2 = 3^2 + (-4)^2
r^2 = 9 + 16
r^2 = 25

Now we can take the positive square root to solve for r:

r = sqrt(25)
r = 5

So the distance from the origin to the point (3, -4) is 5. To find the angle (theta) in polar coordinates, we can use the inverse tangent function:

theta = arctan(y/x)
theta = arctan(-4/3)

Note that we use the negative value for y because the point is in the third quadrant, where y values are negative.

So the polar coordinates for the point (3, -4) with r > 0 are (5, arctan(-4/3)).

Learn more about Cartesian coordinates: https://brainly.com/question/4726772

#SPJ11

(a) Let X be the length of an eel in the lake. Then X ~ N(84, 18^2). The probability that an eel is a giant (i.e., X > 120) is:

P(X > 120) = P(Z > (120-84)/18) = P(Z > 2) = 0.0228 (using standard normal distribution table)

Therefore, the probability that an eel is a giant is 0.0228 or about 2.28%.

(b) Let Y be the number of giants in a sample of 100 eels. Then Y follows a binomial distribution with parameters n = 100 and p = P(X > 120) = 0.0228. The expected number of giants in a sample of 100 eels is:

E(Y) = np = 100(0.0228) = 2.28

Therefore, we expect about 2.28 giants in a sample of 100 eels.

(c) To find the proportion of eels between 75 cm and 90 cm, we need to standardize these values using the mean and standard deviation of the population:

P(75 < X < 90) = P[(75-84)/18 < (X-84)/18 < (90-84)/18]

= P(-0.5 < Z < 0.33)

= 0.3736 - 0.3085

= 0.0651

Therefore, about 6.51% of eels are between 75 cm and 90 cm.

(d) The distribution of sample means follows a normal distribution with mean μ = 84 and standard error σ/sqrt(n) = 18/sqrt(100) = 1.8 (by Central Limit Theorem). Therefore, the distribution of sample means is N(84, 1.8^2).

To learn more about Central Limit Theorem click here : brainly.com/question/898534

#SPJ11

The missing word or segment from the box that would correctly complete the sentence depends on the specific transformation applied to trapezoid ABCD.

In order to provide the missing word or segment, we need more information about the transformation applied to trapezoid ABCD to obtain trapezoid EFGH. Transformations can include translation, rotation, reflection, or dilation.

If the transformation is a translation, we can complete the sentence by saying "Trapezoid EFGH is the result of a translation of trapezoid ABCD."

If the transformation is a rotation, we can complete the sentence by saying "Trapezoid EFGH is the result of a rotation of trapezoid ABCD."

If the transformation is a reflection, we can complete the sentence by saying "Trapezoid EFGH is the result of a reflection of trapezoid ABCD."

If the transformation is a dilation, we can complete the sentence by saying "Trapezoid EFGH is the result of a dilation of trapezoid ABCD."

Without further information about the specific transformation, it is not possible to provide the exact missing word or segment to complete the sentence.

Learn more about Trapezoid here:

https://brainly.com/question/31380175

#SPJ11

The point (1.8, 0) a good approximation of an x-intercept

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

y = -16x² + 29x

The x-intercept is when y = 0

So, we have

x = 1.8 and y = 0

When these values are substituted in the above equation, we have the following

-16(1.8)² + 29(1.8) = 0

Evaluate

0.36 = 0

0.36 approximates to 0

This means that the point (1.8, 0) a good approximation of an x-intercept

Read more about x-intercept at

https://brainly.com/question/3951754

#SPJ1

Given that to multiply (7x 3)(7x−3), we can use the pattern:

(a b)(a−b)=a2−b2.

Now, we need to find the values of a and b.

Using the given formula

(a b)(a−b)=a2−b2,

we can equate the values as follows:

(7x 3)(7x−3) = (a b)(a−b)

= a² - b²

Comparing the coefficients on both sides, we get:

7x as a common factor on the left side

[(7x) × (3 − 3)] = (a b) + (a − b)

Now, the brackets on the left side simplify to 0, which means that the brackets on the right side of the equation have to add up to 0.

Therefore,(a b) + (a − b) = 0

This simplifies to 2a − b = 0 ...(1)

We know that

a² - b² = 14

7x² - b² = 14

7x² = b²

b = ±7x

Substituting b in (1),

2a − ±7x = 0

a = ±(7x/2)

Hence, the values of a and b are a = ±(7x/2), b = ±7x.

To know more about multiply visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30875464

#SPJ11

The solution to all parts is shown below.

a) The equation of the regression line is:

Nicotine = 0.154030 + 0.065052 x Tar

b) To estimate the nicotine content of cigarettes with 4 milligrams of tar, substitute Tar = 4 in the regression equation:

Nicotine = 0.154030 + 0.065052 x 4

= 0.407238

Therefore, the estimated nicotine content of cigarettes with 4 milligrams of tar is 0.407238 milligrams.

c) The slope of the regression line (0.065052) represents the increase in nicotine content for each unit increase in tar content.

In other words, on average, for each additional milligram of tar in a cigarette, the nicotine content increases by 0.065052 milligrams.

d) The y-intercept of the regression line (0.154030) represents the estimated nicotine content when the tar content is zero. However, this value is not practically meaningful because there are no cigarettes with zero tar content.

e) To find the nicotine content of the new brand of cigarette with 7 milligrams of tar and a residual of -0.5 milligrams, first calculate the predicted nicotine content using the regression equation:

Nicotine = 0.154030 + 0.065052 x 7

= 0.649446

The residual is the difference between the observed nicotine content and the predicted nicotine content:

Residual = Observed Nicotine - Predicted Nicotine

-0.5 = Observed Nicotine - 0.649446

Observed Nicotine = -0.5 + 0.649446 = 0.149446

Therefore, the estimated nicotine content of the new brand of cigarette with 7 milligrams of tar and a residual of -0.5 milligrams is 0.149446 milligrams.

Learn more about Residual here:

https://brainly.com/question/28331795

#SPJ1

The line integral of F=xyi+yzj+xzk from (0,0,0) to (1,1,1) over the path C given by r=ti+t^2j+t^4k for 0≤t≤1 is 1/5.

To solve for the line integral, we first need to parameterize the curve. From the given equation, we have r(t) = ti + t^2j + t^4k.

Next, we need to find the differential of r(t) with respect to t: dr/dt = i + 2tj + 4t^3k.

Now we can substitute r(t) and dr/dt into the line integral formula:

∫[0,1] F(r(t)) · (dr/dt) dt = ∫[0,1] (t^3)(t^2)i + (t^5)(t)j + (t^2)(t^4)k · (i + 2tj + 4t^3k) dt

Simplifying this expression, we get:

∫[0,1] (t^5 + 2t^6 + 4t^9) dt

Integrating from 0 to 1, we get:

[1/6 t^6 + 2/7 t^7 + 4/10 t^10]_0^1 = 1/6 + 2/7 + 2/5 = 107/210

Therefore, the line integral is 107/210.

However, we need to evaluate the line integral from (0,0,0) to (1,1,1), not just from t=0 to t=1.

To do this, we can substitute r(t) into F=xyi+yzj+xzk, giving us F(r(t)) = t^3 i + t^3 j + t^5 k.

Then, we can substitute t=0 and t=1 into the integral expression we just found, and subtract the results to get the line integral over the given path:

∫[0,1] F(r(t)) · (dr/dt) dt = (107/210)t |_0^1 = 107/210

Therefore, the line integral of F over the path C is 1/5.

For more questions like Integral click the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/18125359

#SPJ11